L-87-283, Forwards Markup of Tqr 2.0,Rev 6,Page 3 of 7 & Tqr 2.0,Rev 7,Page 3 of 8 Re Annual Update of Topical QA Rept for Clarification Requested by Nrc,Per 870701 Telcon
| ML17342A747 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 07/07/1987 |
| From: | Woody C FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM) |
| References | |
| L-87-283, NUDOCS 8707150645 | |
| Download: ML17342A747 (6) | |
Text
REGULATORY I.
RMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSl..
(R IDS)
ACCESSION NOR: 87071 50645 DOC. DATE: 87/07/07 NOTARIZED:
NO DOCKET FACIL: 50-250 Tur keg Point Plant Unit 3, Florida Poaer and Light C
05000250 50-251 Turkey Point Plante Unit 4i Florida Power and Light C
05000251 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION WOODY> C. O.
Florida Power 8c Light Co.
RECIP. NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)
SUBJECT:
Forwards markup of TGR 2. Ok Rev bd page 3 of-7 5 TGR 2. Qi Rev'e page 3 of 8 re annual update of Topical GA rept for clarification requested bg NRCe per 870701 telcon.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
IE43D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR ENCL SIZE:
TITLE:
- 50. 54. a. 3 S.
- 50. 55.f. 3 Change to SAR GA Program NOTES:
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-2 LA COP IES LTTR ENCL 1
0 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME McDONALDiD COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 INTERNAL: ARM/DAF/LFMB 02 EXTERNAL" DMB/DSS NRC PDR 1
0 1
1 1
1 1
1 NRR/DLPG/GAB RGN2 FILE 01 LPDR 1
1 1
1 1
1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COP lES REGUIRED:
LTTR 9
ENCL '
P. 0, BOX 1400 NO BEACH, FL 3340B 0420 JUL'Y 7 1987 L-87-283 IO CFR 50.54(a)
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Gent lemen:
Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-25l St. Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 To ical Qualit Assurance Re ort (FPL TQAR I-76A)
By letter dated June l0, l987, (L-87-24I) Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) submitted Revision IO of the subject report.
ln response to a telephone discussion on July I, l987 between FPL and NRC Region ll staff regarding our annual update of the subject report, attached please find (I) a pen and ink mark-up of TQR 2.0, Rev. 6, page 3 of 7, and (2) TQR 2.0, Rev. 7, page 3 of 8.
These replacement pages provide the clarification requested by the NRC staff.
Should there be any further questions, please contact us.
Very truly yours,
~
~
C. 0.
oody Group Vice President Nuclear Energy COW/GRM/cn Attachments cc:
Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator, Region ll, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St. Lucie Plant Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant 8707550645 870707 PDR ADDCK 05000250 p
PDR M5 059 I
PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE
ICALQUALITYASSURANCE RE T
I TQR 2.0.
FLORIDA POWER 4 LIGHTCOMPANY QUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAM Rev.
6 Date 3une 10, 1986 Page 3
of 7
2.2.2 Program Documentation The Topical Quality Assurance Report, which defines the policy, goals, and objectives regarding the Quality Assurance Program, shall be contained in the FPL Quality Assurance Manual, and used as guidance for the development of corporate level Quality Procedures which are also contained in the Quality Assurance Manual.
Revisions to the Topical Quality Assurance Report will be made, as needed, to reflect current FPL program requirements and descriptions of activities.
These revisions shall be made in accordance with a Quality
~dCdi on og +h~ Cornmittmiot" Procedure.
If a program revision reflects a 4e+44ea from the baseline rc.eiS ow giicE caPPQ;gyes 4.I documents contained in Appendix C, shall be submitted to<the NRC t
In all other
- cases, amendments to the Topical QA Report will be submitted to the NRC to reflect implemented program revisions on an annual or more frequent basis.
Quality Procedures shall be written by the department with major responsibilities for an activity or by the Quality Assurance Department when requested.
These procedures shall be reviewed by all the departments with responsibility for some portion of that procedure, and shall be approved by the major implementing departments with co-approval by the Director of Quality Assurance.
A listing of corporate level Quality Procedures is contained in Appendix E.
Each Quality'rocedure shall be written to further address criteria contained in the Topical Quality Requirements and to further define the FPL QA policies, plans, and program where action is required by more than one department.
Each department head shall have the responsibility for implementation of the Quality Assurance
- Program, which includes compliance with procedure requirements applicable to his department.
In addition, he shall be responsible
ICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT TQR
- 2. 0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Rev.
Date June 10 19S7 I
Page 3
of S
'2.2.1 Goals and Objectives (Cont'd) d.
e.
Apprise management of unresolved problems and trends which could have a significant effect on nuclear power plant safety; and Prevent schedule delays and high cost due to poor quality.
2.2. 2 Program Documentation The Topical Quality Assurance
- Report, which defines the policy,
- goals, and objectives regarding the Quality Assurance. Program, shall be contained in the FPL Quality Assurance
- Manual, and used as guidance for the development of corporate level Quality Procedures which are also contained in the Quality Assurance Manual.
Revisions to the Topical Quality Assurance Report will be made, as
- needed, to reflect current FPL program requirements and descriptions of activities.
These revisions shall be made in accordance with a Quality Procedure.
If a program revision reflects a reduction of the commitments from the baseline documents contained in Appendix C, the revision shall be submitted to and approved by the NRC prior to implementation.
In all other cases, amendments to the Topical QA Report will be submitted to the NRC to reflect implemented program revisions on an annual or more frequent basis.
IO CO CV 0'
l7O 0
lA C0Z Ol
~4 CV 0
U.
Quality Procedures shall be written by the department with major responsibilities for an
- activity, or by the Quality Assurance Department when requested.
These procedures shall be reviewed by all the departments with responsibility for some portion of that procedure, and shall be approved by the major implementing departments with co-approval by the Director of Quality Assurance.
A listing of corporate level Quality Procedures is contained in Appendix E.
1 I