L-82-541, Submits Addl Response to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-389/82-43.Corrective Actions Cited in 821108 Final Response.Site Quality Instruction (Qi) 10.13 Requires Installation Insp for ASME Class 1,2 & 3 Tanks

From kanterella
(Redirected from L-82-541)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Addl Response to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-389/82-43.Corrective Actions Cited in 821108 Final Response.Site Quality Instruction (Qi) 10.13 Requires Installation Insp for ASME Class 1,2 & 3 Tanks
ML20070N593
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/13/1982
From: Robert E. Uhrig
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20070N573 List:
References
L-82-541, NUDOCS 8301250550
Download: ML20070N593 (1)


Text

g v

m i

e P. O. BOR 14C33, JUNO B E ACH, F L 33408 D

FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 9 ppp g-December 13, 1982 L-82-541 Mr. James P. O'Reilly Regional Administrator, Region 11 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 300 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Re:

Ril:BR C St. Lucie Unit 2 Docket No. 50-389/82-43

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

On November M,19R7 Floriela l'ower anel i Ight provieleel n final r espon=n in ihn vinintion, bidallule to 1%) low Pros estures for inspertion up! lo:nnves of 4 oinponent t nollog Water Surge l'a nk".

l'er teleron with your Mr. t :.untcl.lultan,1 for ola l'ov er.uul Light is providing a supplemental response to the above violation.

As required by Site Quality Instruction (Ql) 10.13, all ASME Section 111 Class I, 2, and 3 tanks are required and do receive installation inspections.

If the tank required a Construction Process Sheet (CPS) for installation, then the inspection would be performed during the process at the indicated Q.C. hold point. If the tank did not require a CPS for installation, then the inspection would be performed either during the process or sometime af ter. As part of Appendix "B" of Procedure SQP-64, if the installation inspection had not yet been performed at the time of turnover to Start-up, this would be noted as an exception on the punch list.

As noted in the final response, the turnover package for the component cooling water system erroneously indicated that an installation inspection for the subject tank had been performed and completed.

The corrective actions cited in the final response are intended to prevent the recurrence of this deficiency.

Very truly yours, P#

R'obert E. U rig Vice President Advanced Systems and Technology JO/au cc Harold F. Reis, Esquire 8301250550 821229 PDR ADOCK 05000389 O

PDR PEOPLE.. SERVING PEOPLE

,