L-82-469, Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-250/82-29 & 50-251/82-29.Corrective Actions: Procedure Revised to Clarify Policy for Tagging Motor Operated Valves
| ML20070B294 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 10/29/1982 |
| From: | Robert E. Uhrig FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20070B236 | List: |
| References | |
| L-82-469, NUDOCS 8212090503 | |
| Download: ML20070B294 (2) | |
Text
e-P. O. BOX 14000, JUNO B E ACH, F L 33406 s
.:o c:
dTE'~.2.u,A E
4 FLORIDA POWER & l.lGHT COMPANY p}
q October 29, 1982 L-82-469 Mr. James P. O'Reilly Regional Administrator, Regicn II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
Re: Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 Docket Nos. 50-250, 50-251 IE Inspection Report 82-29 Florida Power & Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection report and a response is attached.
There is no proprietary information in the report.
Very truly yours, F.voert E. Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems & Technology REU/PLP/js Attachment cc: Harold F. Reis, Esquire r
8212090503 821116 PDR ADOCK 05000250 G
PDR PEOPLE.. SERVING PEOPLE
ATTACHMENT RE:
TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 AND 4 DOCKET NOS. 50-250, 50-251 IE INSPECTION REPORT 82-29 FINDING:
Technical Speci fication 6.8.1 requi res, i n pa rt, that written procedures be impl emented.
Procedure A. P. 0103.4 speci fies the method fo r placing and remo vi ng tags for administrative control of equipment.
Cont ra ry to t he above, s teps 4.5, 8.5.2 a nd 8.6 of Admi ni strative Procedure 0103.4, "In Plant Equipment Clearance Orders" were not f ully impl emented for equipment clearance order (EC0) 7-155 in effect from 7/19/82 to 7/23/82.
A danger tag was improperly pl aced, the EC0 form wa s not completed, and the clearance wa s not properly removed f rom val ve MOV-878B i n the sa fety i njection s ys t em.
RESPO NS E :
(1-1)
FPL concurs with the finding.
(1-2)
The reason for this finding was that the procedure fo r i n-pl ant clearances did not clearly define where' tags were to be placed nor did the procedure include a wo rka ble mechani sm fo r tempo rary rel eases of clea rances.
(1-3)
As corrective action, the danger tag was removed from MOV-8788 and the operator wa s counselled on the need fo r
[.
proper completion of the EC0 form.
l (1-4)
In order to prevent recurrence, Admi nistrative Procedure l
0103.4, In-Plant Equipment Clearance Orders has been revi sed to clarify the policy fo r tagging M0V's and also to include provisions for temporary clearance releases, j
(1-5)
Full compli ance wa s achieved on September 30, 1982.
l