L-82-436, Advises That Util Review of Current Nuclear Plant Staff Working Hours Indicates That Overtime Restrictions Meet Intent of Revised NRC Policy.Requirements Incorporated in Administrative Procedures & Need Not Be Added to Tech Specs

From kanterella
(Redirected from L-82-436)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Util Review of Current Nuclear Plant Staff Working Hours Indicates That Overtime Restrictions Meet Intent of Revised NRC Policy.Requirements Incorporated in Administrative Procedures & Need Not Be Added to Tech Specs
ML17341B425
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/12/1982
From: Robert E. Uhrig
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737 GL-82-12, IEB-80-02, IEB-80-2, L-82-436, NUDOCS 8210190351
Download: ML17341B425 (4)


Text

f8' 5p I DOCKET 05000250 0500025.1 NOTES:

REGULATORY FORMATION DISTRIBUTION 'S M 0RIDS)

AOCBSSION NBR 8210190351 DOC ~ OATEN2/10/1'2 NOTARI'ZED:

NO FACIL:.50-250 Turkey Point Pl anti "Uni't 3i Florida Power and Light C

50 '251'Turkey Point.Plant~ 'Uni,t 4~ Florida Power and Light C

AUTH BYNAME AUTHOR A F F ILI'ATI ON UHRI6 i R ~ E ~

F)oneida Power 8 Liight Co,

'RECIP ~ NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION EISENHUT~.DE G, Division of Licensiqg

SUBJECT:

Advises ~that util'eview of current nuclear plant >staff working hours indicates, that. overtime restrictions meet intent of revised NRC policy,Requiremenbs incorporated in

~administr ative procedures 8

need not be -added tto Tech

'Specs'I'STRIBUTION "CODE A046S

'COP IES "RECEI VED LTR 8

ENCL g SIZE ~.

TITLE:

OR Submi'ttal': 'TMI Action Plan Rgmt NUREG 0'737 8

NUREG"0660

-RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NRR ORB 1 BC 01 INT>ERNAL ~

'EL D/HDS l IE/DEP EPDS NRR/DE DIR 21 NRR/DE/ADMQE 23 NRR/DHFS/DEPY29 NRR/DL/ADL 16 NRR/DL/ADSA 17 NRR/DSI DIR 20 NRR/DSI/ADRP 26 NRR/DSI/AEB NRR/DSI/RAB NRR/

ADGP 31 F IL 04 EXTERNALS ACRS 3Q INPO J ~ STARNE'S NRC:PDR 02 NTI'

<COPIES LTTR ENCL 7

b7 1

i0, 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

10 10 1

l 1

1 1

1 RFCIPIENT ID CODE/NAME IE/DEP D IR 33 IE/DEP/EPLB

'NRR/DE/ADCSE 22 NRR/DHFS DIR 28 NRR/DL D'IR 14 NRR/DL'/ADOR 1'5 NRR/DL/ORAB 18 NRR/DSI/ADCPS25 NRR/DSI/ADRS 27 NRR/DS I/ETS8 NRR/DST DIR 30 NRR/DST/ADT 32 RGN2 FEMA.REP DIV LPDR 03 NSIC 0.5 COPIES LTiTR ENCL 1

1

'3 3

1 1

1 1

1 1'

3 3

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 TOTAL NUMBER OF 'COPIES REQUIRED e L~TTR 53 ENCL,52

h t th) if~

t)r,rh f

, h'g

'ff PW

jhow fr II ig>. fr g 'I jj,f.jh jhh f Ifg If ]4'4 'l I, I

('I'

>~ If I

lf'I'l 1 l<<.

>>I f "',

I ifVlf'4f II I jg ha;hT

'.'l.t h

.'hj]Ig

,',f., hjf hl r

~

h )j'j 41

~h~-;fI t ~.~ii >>.jf~ >~>>~f>> 'fh, ~f.,~ <r>>

4rjhg I ~II<<,gf ff'Q fsi 4'si

'h ff t hf 1" I

hfj'",If 0

~ 3W

+Ih 'f f

f hfdf'<<IA 'f g i,lff 4"4 jilg, Iri hj f SII '+I t ~ hi h f ')

" l'l I

f3 'i<< f 4, r>1

~,4 j~

hj

~

Q jl 4 il jg

'I I'4 )~

Q I 't' 4

I III 4

'I

~'> P...'+ ll,)

i;jj.h g fj)3 p

'llh f 1

f i f 1444 ljl S

Ijl fI<<S '"Sl tl g

j t f 'll "SS 111'I, LA SI

'If "I

I I I "Ii h~

'll,jiI jj Pelf +<<hj-j fh tr

<<(i's I > f "~ gj'.ll rt-I Ifl SI )

J[

r1 I 7 g

4

. BOX 14000, JUNO BEACH, FL 33408 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY October 12, 1982 L-82-436 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Atgention:

Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Mr. Eisenhut:

Re:

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4

Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 Generic Letter 82-12 Nuclear Power Plant Staff Workin Hours Your Generic Letter 82-12, Nuclear Power Plant Staff Working Hours, transmitted your revised policy on overtime and requested that FPL review our past actions to assure that they are consistent with it.

This Generic Letter was the latest in a series of clarifications on the subject of overtime restrictions that began in February 1,

1980 with 18E Bulletin 80-02.

t We have reviewed our current status regarding overtime restrictions and conclude that they meet the spirit and intent of your policy statement.

The current policy is the same which was in place and was reviewed against NUREG-0737 and found acceptable by Steven Varga in his October 20, 1981 letter.

While there are several differences between NUREG-0737 and 82-12, the major difference appears to be the request to amend the admini-strativee section of the Technical Specifications to assure the procedures and documentation required are followed. It is our position that these requirements, are adequately enforced by incorporation in the Administrative Procedures and amending the Technical Specifications is unnecessary at this time.

Very truly yours, p~ A Robert E.

rig Vice President Advanced Systems and Technology REU/JEM/cab cc:

Mr. James P. O'Rei lly, Region II Harold F. Reis, Esquire

- 82loi9035f 82i012 8 ADOCK 05000250PDR'EOPI.E...

SERVING PEOPLE

4i I~

I

~i'