L-82-415, Forwards Response to Findings Identified in 820831-0901 Audit of Electrical Area
| ML17213A518 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 09/24/1982 |
| From: | Robert E. Uhrig FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| L-82-415, NUDOCS 8210010017 | |
| Download: ML17213A518 (6) | |
Text
REGULATORY
'0 TION DISTRIBUTION SY.
M IDS)
ACCESSION NBR:8210010017 DOC,DATE: 82/09/24 NOTARIZED:
NO FACIL:50"389 St, Lucie Planti Unit 2< Florida Power 8 Light Co>
AUTH,NAME AUTHOR Af FILIATION UHRIG p R,E ~
Florida Power L Light Co, REC IP ~ NAME REC IPIENT AFFILIATION EISENHUT~D,G, Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
Forwards response to findings identified in 820831-0901 audit of electr ical area.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
B001S COPIES RECEIVED:LTR
~
ENCL
~
SIZE:
TITLE: Licensing Submi t tal:
PSAR/FSAR Amdts L Rel ated Cor respondence NOTES:
DOCKET 05000389 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME A/D LICENSNG LIC BR ¹3 LA INTERNAL: E,LD/HDS2 IE/DEP EPDS 35 NRR/DE/AEAB NRR/DE/EQB 15 NRR/DE/HGEB 30 NRR/DE/MTEB 17 NRR/DE/SAB 24 NRR/DHFS/HFEB40 NRR/DHFS/OLB 34 NRR/DSI/AEB 26 NRR/DSI/CPB 10 NRR/DSI/ETSB 12 NRR/DS I/PSB 19 8
23 REG 04 RM/DDAMI/MI8 EXTERNAL: ACRS 41 DMB/DSS (AMDTS)
LPDR 03 NSIC 05 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
0 0
1 0
1 1
1 0
3 3
2 2
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
0 6
6 1
1 1
1 1
1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME LIC BR ¹3 BC NERSES g V ~
0 1 IE F ILE IE/DEP/EPLB 36
.NRR/DE/CEB 11 NRR/DE/GB 28 NRR/DE/MEB 18 NRR/DE/QAB 21 NRR/DE/SEB 25 NRR/DHFS/LQB 32 NRR/DHFS/PTRB20 NRR/DS I/ASB 27 NRR/DS I/CSB 09 NRR/DS I/ICSB 16 NRR/DSI/RAB 22 NRR/DST/LGB 33 RGN2 BNL(AMDTS ONLY)
FEMA-REP DIV 39 NRC PDR 0?
NTIS COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
0 1
1 1
1 3
3 1
1 2,
2 1
1 1
1 1
1.
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 1
1 1
1 1,
1 1
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 55 ENCL 49
h WW>>J~
II
~
>> Wgfj W
~
1 J ),
P I
T
!a >>,
Clj>>
') w>>f g
'i " iiil >>'",
) gWV I,WV lj Wl f
.jfl'j jf.h r
Il l >>j!f~ lj l
'V f 'lh f, jj i f ~'$ 'j jj I >>>> Ijj,) >,
) Wp Vj>>>>jh I >>v jf'VW jf ii; o r',jj.,jj, W If ~
W II fjJA I >>tj,)
fj lf' V,S>> g jV y ),jjC1h> p,+
W% g VV h j g
gals
'D>>,jWjjjhw't,w)
i 'f,
5>>w W'IV' t
If j'w'>> )f-
'~"l<
)ivy>7 h~
jj jf" lfrj W'r' ea hi hj&
jhj QEVW 4 '1
>>vj Lf.,.j 'j,>>I >>'l V
~
>>If f'jj,>>
",gW
',",", 3'1
'jl jl jj i Y>> v'I fj Vjj;II>>>,
~ 0,
-,,".A,', I~ j>>,F",>>
. f>>,jf fj r <<hj
~ e>>r,,f it jj;,
h ) ji l t lh
- .!jl f I
i
.jf I
W ih W'
jj)
I
~
VW y,
~h 'l i!.
w" I lf h jj,j>>
I W fjih.p If
',) T
)
fi ff II I'
>>VN h
I hW' 1
j Vh v>>j'hjh
,'1 Ij 1w lV 1,
ry1,,
aq>>,,
1 hi Wh i!
'VW'h V
i V
e>>
h' Vj ij '<'>>
jjW lI jhj Vj h
hh
'e'V, (lf 3 h
jf
'W I "h,4 fj I
<'C VI I W 'I hi!!~ha "
~
'1 jI,P>>JIXj t ~ 'X Vj
P BO 00, JUNO BEACH, FL 30408 FLORIDAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY September 24, 1982 L-82-415 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations
'Attention:
Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.
C.
20555
Dear Mr. Eisenhut:
Re:
St. Lucie Unit No.
2 Docket No. 50-389 Responses to Electrical Audit Findings Attached are our responses to the audit findings that were identified by your staff during the August 31 through September 1 audit conducted in the electrical area.
These responses complete our reporting on these audit findings.
Very truly yours,.
Robert E. Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems and Technology f
REU/RJS/JES/jea Attachment cc:
J.
P.
O'Rei lly, Region II Harold F. Reis, Esquire 8210010017 820924 PDR ADOCK 05000389 A
PDR PEOPLE..: SERVING PEOPLE
NRC ELECTRICAL SITE AUDIT Au ust 31 1982 Item No. 1:
The construction status of individual systems did not appear to be as complete as expected to perform an indepth audit.
P I
ss
~Res onse:
The electrical systems in St. Lucis Unit 2 are at least 90% complete which is the target level requested by the NRC prior to a site audit.
The remaining 10% precludes all systems from being fully operational at the time of review.
but does provide a clear indication of the methods used dur-ing engineering and construction to comply with the specified design criteria.
Item No. 2:
The electrical cable tray covers were. not in place for the site audit.
This was an observation, not a finding.
~Res onse:
The electrical cable tray covers will be placed on the cable trays when all construction work is complete and prior to core load.
Se tember 1
1982 Item No. 1:
One electrical cable tray did not have any identification.
What method is used to verify that cable trays are proper'ly.
marked or identified?
~Res onse:
In addition to the ongoing quality control review during construction, 'a final walk-down of all cable trays will be performed by the inspection personnel at the completion of construction.
This final walk-down has not yet been per-formed.
Any missing or erroneous labels would be identified on this final inspection and corrected.
Item No. 2:
The backfit items require/ by Regulatory Guides 1.63 and 1.75 were not available for'review.
This was an observation and not a finding.
~Res onse:
The modifications to St. Lucis Unit 2 that are re- ':
quired to comply with Regulatory Guides 1.63 and 1.75 will be completed by the startup following the first refueling outage.
This schedule was reviewed and accepted by the NRC staff in their safety evaluation report.
Item No.
3:
There did not appear to be a commitment to test the capability of the fast-dead bus transfer feature.
The NRC will review this item inhouse.
No FPL response is required.
~ ~
NRC ELECTRICAL SITE A September 1,
1982 Pa e
2 OO Item No. 4:
There is high voltage electrical equipment located in the same room as the cable spreading area although this equip-ment is not in the same area as the cable raceways.
This results in an apparent disagreement between the NRC and FPL about the definition of cable spreading area as defined in IEEE-384.
The NRC will review this item inhouse.
No FPL response is required.
Item No. 5:
FPL described their "First Out Protective Trip" indication.
The NRC will review this inhouse against the existing criteria to determine compliance.
No FPL response is required.