L-77-206, Advising FPLs Health Physics Should Not Require Modification Re NRCs 3/2/1977 Letter Which Concerning Radiation Protection Criteria

From kanterella
(Redirected from L-77-206)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advising FPLs Health Physics Should Not Require Modification Re NRCs 3/2/1977 Letter Which Concerning Radiation Protection Criteria
ML18227D480
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  
Issue date: 07/05/1977
From: Robert E. Uhrig
Florida Power & Light Co
To: Lear G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-77-206
Download: ML18227D480 (5)


Text

I NR~~~)96 U.S. NUCI EAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

> (2.782'RC DISTR ISUTION FoR PART 50 DOCKET iVIATERIAL t

OOCItIET NUMBER 50 FILE NUMBER Mr. George Lear t

FROM:FPL Miami",. FL.

33101 Robert E. Uhrig DATE OF OOCUMENT 07-05-77 oAJE Rfc)IvEo t Z4.ETTER

@ORIGINAL SCOPY QNOTORIZEO

%fUNCLASSIF I E 0 PROP INPUT FORM NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIYEO MltmllltLBIIN

'30 MOTRm~)

2 pages

,'ESCRIPTION Advising that FPL's health physics should not require modification regarding.

NRC's 03-02-77 ltr. concerning Radiation grotec Criteria....

g!

ENCt.OSU RE ion

~ I I'

~I

~

lm lA<

It URKFY POINT UN Jcm'07-11-77 FOR ACTION/INFORMATION ENVIRHNMENTAL ASSIGNED AD:

V~ MOORE LTR BRANCH CHIEF:

0 ECT iiNAGER:

CENSING ASSISTANT:

rr

~

~

PROJECT

~WI VAGER:

LICENSING ASSISTANT:

B~ HARLESS INTERNALDISTRIBUTION S

SAFETY OEDER PLAÃF SY STEMS TEDESCO BENAROYA SITE SAFETY &

ENVIRON ANALYSIS DENTON & MULLER ENGINEERING IPPOLETO OPERATING REACTORS ENVIRO TECH ERNST BALLARD 0

G BLOOD O

4 VA CHECK ALT~

TBERG EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION BAER BUTL"R GRIMES GAHMILL 2

SE'ZZ ANALYSIS VOLL'KR BUNCH J ~ COLLiNS CONTROL NUiVISER TIC BEG IV J

HAiICHETT 16 CYS ACRS SENT CA GO Y NSIC 77 1 '0",)OS 7t-

r"'al') ~- ">qf,,

~ fr\\

'I 4 ~

C

~

~

P. O. BOX 013100, MIAMI, FL 33101 (Ci FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHTCOMPANY

~ii&

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:

Mr. George Lear, Chief Operating Reactors Branch I3 Division of Operating Reactors U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.

C.

20555 July 5, 1977 L-77-206

~

l

Dear Mr. Lear:

Re:

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4

Docket Nos.

50-250 and 50-251 Radiation Protection Criteria Your letter of March 2, 1977 listed six criteria regarding the activities "individuals qualified in radiation protection pro-cedures" should be able to perform.

We have considered the six criteria in a review of the health physics qualifications of Turkey Point plant personnel, FPL health physics practices, and current Turkey Point Technical Specification requirements in the health physics area.

Technical Specification 6.2.2.d requires that "an individual qualified in radiation protection procedures shall be on site when fuel is in the reactor".

We do not interpret this specification as requiring the continuous presence of health physics personnel on site.

We can meet the specification by requiring the continuous presence of personnel qualified to judge whether an abnormal situation constitutes a health physics hazard needing the attention of someone from the Health Physics Depart-ment.

The training and requalification programs associated with the Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) license include sufficient classroom and field training in health physics and radiation protection practices and procedures to allow an SRO to satisfy the Technical Specification.

An SRO is qualified by his training to perform approximately 90% of the criteria in your March 2

letter.

The remaining 10% are considered routine health physics or radiation protection activities and are performed by health physics personnel during normal working hours.

The Health Physics Department provides personnel trained and qualified in health physics and radiation protection procedures for 15 of the 21 shifts in each week.

All routine health physics activities are performed during these 15 shifts.

ln addition,

+> ~

'DOg w PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE

~ '~e-l c<<r lA 1

'-'oui,r,

~

" +' ( b + pfq Fg 4 $

-Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Page Two health physics personnel are called to the site if they are not already on site whenever operating or maintenance activities require health physics coverage.

Our review has shown that the practices described above meet the intent of Technical Specification 6.2.2.d.

They also meet the intent of 10 CFR 20 to maintain personnel exposure to ionizing radiation "as low as reasonably achievable".

Since receipt of the Operating Licenses for Units 3 and 4, our health physics experience has been satisfactory, thus our health physics practices should not require modification.

Very truly yours, 4g(-('ice President REU/MAS/cpc cc:

Mr. Norman C. Moseley, Region II Robert Lowenstein, Esquire