JAFP-99-0279, Correction to 980226 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising Ref 19 to Assume 90% SBGT Sys Charcoal Efficiency,Instead of 99%.Ref 19 on TS Page 285 Needs to Be Changed from Rev 0 to Rev 1,based on Revised Calculation
| ML20217G496 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | FitzPatrick  |
| Issue date: | 10/14/1999 |
| From: | Michael Colomb POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20217G500 | List: |
| References | |
| JAFP-99-0279, TAC-MA1136, NUDOCS 9910210305 | |
| Download: ML20217G496 (2) | |
Text
-
h e'
James A. Fit: Patrick
. Ne*: lear Power Plant,
" 068 Laks Road j
j 3
- 0. Box 41 -
y' j
f ycorning, New York 13093 J
315-342 3840 E
Michael J. Colomb 4# Authon.ty sne sec.e mee, 4
October 14,1999 JAFP-99-0279 -
U.S. Naclear Rcgulatory_ Commission
- Attn: Document Control Desk -
Mail Station P1-137
.Wasbngon, DC 20555
SUBJECT:
James' A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-333 Correction to Proposed Technical Specification Amendment Reaardina Allowed Containment Leakane Rate (JPTS-97 007) (TAC MA1136)
Reference:
NYPA Letter, James Knubel to the NRC (JPN-98-007), "Lhanges to the Technical Specifications Regarding the Allowed Containment Leakage Rate (L.) (JPTS-97-OO7), dated February 26,1998, h.
Dear Sir:
I This letter provides a coerection to the referenced Technical Specification umendment
. request. The proposed amendment stated that References 19,20, and 21 of the TS
- assumed a Standtiy Gas Treatment (SBGT) system charcoal filter efficiency of 90% for halogens.} 11 vo discovered that reference 19 (Technical Support Center post-accident radiological habitability study) did not assume a 90% SBGT system charcoal efficiency, but rather assumed an efficiency of 99%..The calculation has been revised to assume a 90%
charcoal filter efficiency and is forwarded to the NRC as part of this letter. Based on the revised calculation, Reference 19 on TS page 285 needs to be ahanged frem Revision 0 to
. Revision 1. The revision does not effect the No Significant Vazards conclusion reached in the referenced TS submittal nor the Basis of the Technical Specification Amendment.
Attachments I and ll contain the revised and m+rked-up TS page 285, respectively. These pages replace those submitted as part of the h..erenced submittal. Attachment lli contains the revised calculation, if you have any questions, please conte :t Mr. Robert Steigerwald at (315) 349-6209.
<There'are no' commitments made in this letter.
~
Very truly yours,-
t i
CyQ I
(
MICHAEL J. COLOMB -
Site Executive Officer MJC:RFS:las >
Cc:
'next page' O 0610 3 3 9910210305 991014
- i ppR ADOCK 05000333 PDR g
p m
p, J
~cc:
- Regional Administrator (w/o Att. Ill)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission I
475 Allendale Road King'of Prussia, PA 19406 Office of the Resident inspector (w/o Att.111)
- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box.136 i
Lycoming,' New York 13093 '
Mr.~ G. Vissing, Project Manager (w/all att.)
. Project Directorate i Division of Licensing Project Management U. S. Maclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 8C2 Washington, DC 20555 Mr. F. William Valentino, President (w/o Att. lil)
New York State Energy, Research, and Development Authority Corporate Plaza West 286 Washington Avenue Extension Albainy, NY 12203-6399 y
$.