IR 07100101/2012005
| ML17221A612 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie, 07100101  |
| Issue date: | 01/14/1988 |
| From: | Wilson B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17221A611 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-335-87-25, NUDOCS 8802100303 | |
| Download: ML17221A612 (1) | |
Text
ENCLOSURE
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Florida Power and Light Company St.
Lucie 1 and
Docket Nos.
50-335 and 50-389 License Nos.
DPR-67 and NPF-16 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
inspection conducted on November
December 5,
1987, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
The violation involved entering an operational mode without the necessary limiting conditions for operation being met.
In accordance with the
"General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"
CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the violation is listed below:
Unit 1 Technical Specification (TS) 3.0.4 'requi,res that entry into an operational mode shall not be made unless the conditions of the limiting condition for operation (LCO) are met without reliance on provisions contained in the action statement, unless otherwise excepted.
Contrary to the above, on October 14,'987, Unit 1 entered Mode.4 from Mode 5 without the conditions of LCO 3.6.6.2 being met.
Shield building integrity was not being maintained due to a door that was left open and unattended.
r This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Florida Power and Light Company is hereby required to submit to this Office within 30 days of the date 'of the letter transmitting this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply including (for each violation):
(1) admission or denial of the violation, (2)
the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further viol;"!on, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION s
~ e~J~~
8802i00303 8801 ih PDR ADOCK 0500033>
G Bruce A; Wilson, Chief Reactor Projects Branch
Division of Reactor Projects Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this (IJcii dap of+>><Z<<>
1987