IR 05000525/2006025

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 850525-0625
ML20133F394
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River, 05000525 Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/16/1985
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20133F386 List:
References
50-302-85-26, NUDOCS 8508080268
Download: ML20133F394 (2)


Text

_

_ _ -

es .

JUL 16 1985 ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Florida Power Corporation Docket No. 50-302 Crystal River Unit 3 License No. OPR-72 The following violations were identified during an inspection conducted on May 25 - June 25,1985. The Severity Levels were assigned in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (.10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C). Technical . Specification 6.8.1 requires adherence to the Administrative and Surveillance procedtre Administrative Instr;ction (AI) 600, Conduct of Maintenance, specifies that equipment clearances be" obtained in accordance with Compliance Procedure (CP) 115, In-Plant Equiament Clearance and Switching Orders, and that Work Requests (WRs) be issud 'in accordance with CP-113, Procedure for Handling

. and Controlling Work Requests and Work Package CP-113, paragraph 5.3 requires the W/R be signed by the Nuclear Shift-Supervisor (NSS) before work is begu *

CP-115, paragraph 5.8.2 requires a copy of the accepted clearance to be at the job sit Surveillance Procedure (SP) 210, ASME Class 2 and 3 Hydrostatic testing,

,

requires the following:

-

No valves shall be installed in any lines going to temporarily l installed relief valves and pressure gauges (paragraph 4.2) and,

-

Hydrostatic test boundary valves shall be established as listed on' data j sheet Enclosure 2 (paragraph 7.4).

Contrary to the above, on June 13, 1985, while performing a hydrostatic test of the Nuclear Services Seawater (RW) System, the following items were identified:

The WR used to authorize the performance of the hydrostatic test was

'

-

i signed by the NSS on June 12, 1985, even though work was begun on the l system on June 11, 198 The equipment clearance under order #6-10 was amended and a copy of the amended order was not at the job sit The test was conducted with isolation valves installed in the lines leading to each pressure gauge and the relief valv ,

, O

e, , .

Florida Power Corporation 2 Docket No. 50-302 Crystal River Unit 3 License No. OPR-72

-

Hydrostatic test boundary valve RWV-14, that was listed on Enclosure 2 as a boundary for the test volume, was not the actual boundary valve since upstream valve RWV-6 was left shu This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I). CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criteria V and X, as implemented by the approved

. Florida Power Corporation (FPC) Operational Quality Program, requires the following:

-

Paragraph 1.7.1.5 of the _ FPC Quality Program implements the require-ments of Criteria V and requires written procedures for the performance of work affecting quality and requires adherence to these procedure Paragraph 1.7.1.10 of the FPC Quality Program implements the require-ments of Criteria Y and requires an adequate inspection of the activities being inspecte Contrary to the above, on June 20, 1985, plant modification procedure (MAR)85-03-13-01 was not adhered to in that eight concrete anchor bolts, which were required to be tightened to a torque of 40 to 45 foot pounds, were only torqued to 25 foot pounds. In addition, the inspection of this modifi-cation was inadequate since the inspector failed to identify the incorrect torque value This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged violations; (2) the reasons for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieve Security or safeguards information should be submitted as an enclosure to facilitate withholding it from public disclosure as required by 10 CFR 2.790(d)

or 10 CFR 73.2 Date: JUL 161985  !