IR 05000518/1982003

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-518/82-03,50-519/82-03,50-520/82-03 & 50-521/82-03 on 820201-19.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas inspected:safety-related Pipe Support & Restraint Sys & Open Items
ML20050N485
Person / Time
Site: Hartsville  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 03/16/1982
From: Hardin A, Schapker J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20050N142 List:
References
50-518-82-03, 50-518-82-3, 50-519-82-03, 50-519-82-3, 50-519-8203, 50-520-82-03, 50-520-82-3, 50-521-82-03, 50-521-82-3, NUDOCS 8204140357
Download: ML20050N485 (7)


Text

trg

"

UNITED STATES

o%

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

r REGION 11 f[

101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 o,

ATLANTA,3EORGIA 30303

Report lios. 50-518/82-03, 50-519/82-03, 50-520/82-03, and 50-521/82-03 Licensee: Tennessee Valley Authority 500A Chestnut Street Chattanooga, Th 37401 Facility flame:

Hartsville fluclear Plant Docket tios. 50-518, 50-519, 50-520, and 50-521 License flos. CPPR-150, CPPR-151, CPPR-152, and CPPR-153 Inspection at Hartsville site near liartsville, Tennessee Inspector:

M uAJI 7//6 fL d. F. Scha ker

[

Da'te Signed Approved by:

[ ur 3//bN L A~.' K. Ilardin, Acting Section Chief, Division of Date Signed Project and Resident Programs SullMARY Inspection on February 1-19, 1982 Areas Inspected This routine, announced inspection involved 71 inspector-hours on site in the areas of safety-related pipe support and restraint systems (Unit A-1 and A-2),

open items (all units), and independent inspection effort (A-1 and A-2).

Results Of the three areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.

i

!

e204140357 020319 PDR ADOCK 05000518 G

PDR lC

-

.

DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

  • R. T. Hathcote, Eite Project !!anager R. E. McClure, Unit Supervisor, Mechanical QC. STRIDE T. O. Wilkenson, Unit Supervisor, flaterial Services J. W. Henry, Unit Supervisor, QC Welding T. L. Carden, Assistant Unit Supervisor, QC Welding H. S. Sheppard, Assistant Construction Engineer, Quality Control F. E. Laurent, Unit Supervisor, STRIDE Mechnical Project Engineering G. A. Gonsalves, QA Unit Supervisor 11. U. Rudolphi, Unit Supervisor, Project Engineering, Hangers and Supports

,

J. R. Inger, Unit Supervisor, Project Engineering, Hangers and Supports J. T. McGehee, Engineering flanagement Assistant A. J. Everitt, Welding Engineer D. H. Mickler, Welding Engineer E. D. Loope, Unit Supervisor, QC Hangers Other licensee employees contacted included document control personnel, construction craftsmen, QC technicians, and project engineers.

  • Attended exit interview 2.

Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized with the Site Project Manager on February 12 and 19,1982.

3.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Violation 518/81-18-02:

Failure to Provide Preventive Maintenance to Safety-Related Components.

The inspector reviewed the licensee's response and corrective action to the referenced deficiency, and consider them adequate for the preservation of the equipment involved.

The inspector will follow up on implementation of revised procedure requirements in future inspections of this area.

4.

Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to determine whether they are acceptable or may involve violations or devia-tions. New unresolved items identified during this inspection are discussed in paragraph.

5.

Independent Inspection Effort

,

The inspector made four surveillance tours during which the status of project work was noted, and construction activities were inspected on nuclear safety-related structures, systems and components.

The inspections included:

a.

Storage and periodic maintenance of safety-related equipment stored within construction areas.

The inspector observed safety-related equipment such as: motor operated gate and globe valves, electrical switch gear and transformers.

Inspections were made to assure heater elements where required were energized, equipment was properly protected from water, dust, and damage from on going construction activities such as welding, arc gouging, flame cutting, etc.

Periodic maintenance records for the items inspected were reviewed for current inspection reports in accordance with the licensee's procedure CEP 13.02, Revision 4.

b.

The inspector reviewed qualification and certifications records and applicable procedure for inspection, examination, and testing personnel. The records reviewed were in compliance to licensee procedure identified as CEP 2.10, Revision 5, dated 9/30/81.

The inspector reviewed this procedure and questioned its adequacy in complying with ANSI 45.2.6 and Regulatory Guide 1.58.

This item is currently being pursued by the inspector at NRC Region II and licensing divisions. Pending further investigation in this area, this item is considered unresolved and identified as unresolved item 518, 519, 520, 521/82-03-01. Qualification of inspection personnel to ANSI 45.2.6.

c.

Open Item Control: Newly issued Nonconformance Reports (NCRs),

significant Quality Control Inspection Reports (QCIRs) and QA Unit audit findings were reviewed for pertinence to the inspection program and for adequacy of corrective actions.

Review of QCIR's and NCR's did not disclose any violations or unresolved items.

Within the areas inspected no violations or deviations were identified.

6.

Licensee Identified 50.55(e) Items a.

Previously Identified Items (Closed) 518/81-025, 520/81-024:

Unacceptable Welds Documented as Acceptable by One Individual.

-

--

. _ - -

-. -

.

-

.

-

_ _ __

.--

-

.

The inspector reviewed the final report and supportive documentation.

In addition the inspector visually examined five welds picked at random which had been inspected by the licensee inspector and found them to be acceptable to applicable code requirements.

Defective welds discovered by the licensee have been dispositioned in accordance with code and specification requirements, repaired and re-inspected.

i (Closed) 518, 519, 520 and 521/81-01:

Incorrect Root Face on Skewed

]

Cadweld Sleeves.

Revised Final Report.

l The inspector reviewed the report, and discussed the same with the

cognizant regional specialist.

Questions to licensee by the regional

'

specialist of the previous final report were addressed by the revised final report, and are considered adequate by the inspectors.

The following interim reports were received from the licensee on i

previously identified items. The inspector reviewed these reports and found that none contained information which would permit closure.

Follow on reports are scheduled at later dates.

(0 pen) 518, 519, 520, and 521/81-07-03 Deficiencies in TVA's Pro-curement Control Activity.

i flext scheduled report June 30, 1982.

(0 pen) 518/81-28, 520/81-27 Deficiency in Bethlehem Steel Co.,

t Galvanized A325 Bolts.

flext scheduled report flarch 31, 1982.

(0 pen) 518/81-26, 519/81-20, 520/81-25, and 521/81-21 fio Division of Engineered Design (Eli DES) System to Ensure QA Procedures are Issued Prior to Work Beginning.

flext scheduled report liarch 29, 1982.

(0 pen) 518/81-15, 519/81-11, 520/81-13, 521/81-11 RCIC Steam Line Break.

flext scheduled report May 18, 1982.

(0 pen) 518/81-14, 520/81-12 fio Review of Purchase Request Forms Initiated by Construction.

flext scheduled report April 2, 1982.

(0 pen) 518, 519, 520, and 521/81-03 Standby Gas Treatment System Design Deficiency.

>

flext scheduled report July 30, 1982.

1

-

, -_.

.

. -

.... -

- -, - _ - - - - -..

- - -,

_

_

.,,

.

-

-.

.

.

(0 pen) 518, 520/82-04 Acceptance of Unacceptable Welds on Containment Shell Stiffeners.

Next scheduled report June 30, 1982.

(0 pen) 518/81-13, 520/81-11 QA Documentation for Drywell Framed Dnbedments.

Next scheduled report June 18, 1982.

7.

Safety-Related Pipe Support and Restraint System a.

Observation of Work and Work Activities The inspector observed the following hangers / support assemblies in process of inspection in various stages of completion:

Hanger / Support Drawing Observation *

AI-ST-310875 SN-310875 Revision 1 MV & F.U.

AI-RS-310875 X17-RS-310875 R-0 MV & F.U.

AI-UA-410571 SN-410571 R-0 V.W. Torque, Dimn.

AI-VA-410057 SH-410057 R-0 V.W. Torque, Dimn.

A2-439-AP2-C A25-321439 Ap2R-2 Dimn.,L.G.,V.M.,W.Q.

AI-47-FPI-A MK1 AIS-514A47FPI-R1 V.W & W.Q.

AI-447-AP2-B AIS-321-447-AP2-1 R0 Dimn. L&G XI7-RS-310790 SN-310790 R-0 V.W. & W.Q.

XI7-171-FPI-B AISS15-171FPI R-0 F.U.

XI7-RS-310893 SN-310893 R-1 V.W. & W.Q.

XI7-SP-310678 SH-310678 R-0 V.W. & W.Q.

XI7-VS-310765 SN-310765 R-0 M.V. & V.W.

XI7-VS-310765-R-1 XI7-VS-310786 XN-310786-R-0 M.V. & V.W.

XI 7-VS-310786-R-1 XI7-317-FEI-A & C A15-516-317FEI R-2 Pull Test of Concrete Anchors

._.

=-

.

. _.

._

- -

._.

.

i

.

.

.

  • Torus = fluts/ Bolts Torque Verified; fi.V. = flaterial Verification; F.U.

= Fit-up For Welding; Dimn. = Dimensional Inspection; L.G.

= Line and Grade Location; V.W. = Visual Weld Inspection; W.Q.

= Welder's Qualifications Verified.

The above hanger / support members were also verified to comply with the type and classification of pipe supports specified on approved drawings. Location and spacing were in accordance with requirements as

.'

shown on the drawings and do not exceed the maximum span as shown in 1974 Edition of AS!!E Code Section III, Division 1, Table f4F-3271.4.1.

Bolts, nuts and washers are inspected for material type and torque values by turn of nut method as specified in approved procedures which comply with AISC, Eight Edition " Specifications for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or A490 Bolts."

Spring hangers were observed to indicate cold position for installed hangers.

fio deformation or forced bending was evident. fio deteri-oration or detrimental corrosion was observed.

The latest issue revision of applicable drawings and procedures including Design Change flotices and Field Change Request was utilized by installers and inspection personnel.

flo jacking or rigged pulling of piping for hanger installation was observed.

Piping and equipment adjacent to hanger installation was inspected for evidence of arc strikes, gouging, chaffing, etc., caused by support installation.

fio violations or deviations within the areas inspected were observed.

b.

Review of Records i

QA records of the above hanger / support members were reviewed for the type and classification of pipe support systems, which comply with referenced drawings and specifications.

,

The records confirm that the specification and installation procedures were met or dispositioned accordingly.

The scope of the QC inspections were adequate. Weld identification / location, weld material, corre-sponds to respective weld card and drawings, and were verified by the

'

inspectors.

Welders were verified to be qualified for the welding procedures utilized. The examination records were complete with the exception of designation of the flDE inspector level for visual exami-nation. This is contrary to TVA Procedure "Fitup and Visual Inspection of ASitE Welds" QCI-f1501 Revision 6, Paragraph 7.1(k), which specifies

" Inspector and Level", is to be recorded.

l This deficiency was discussed with the licensee's cognizant supervisory

'

personnel who agreed to take corrective measures by instructing inspectors to indicate level of qualification adjacent to their signature as required by referenced procedure, and verify that past examinations were performed by qualified inspection personnel. This item will be reviewed by the inspector on a future inspection.

IFI

.- -

_ -

- -

-. - _ - -.

-

.

..

- - -

....

,

518, 520/82-03-02, Visual Examination inspectors to record level of certification on applicable inspection records.

Within the areas inspected no violations or deviations were identified.

-

-