IR 05000485/1978001

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Inspec Rept 50-485/78-01 on 781023-25 During Which No Items of Noncompliance Were Noted.Major Areas Inspected Incl:Quality Assurance Prog Re Control of Design & Procurement
ML20062G568
Person / Time
Site: Sterling
Issue date: 11/15/1978
From: Mattia J, Mcgaughy R, Oberg C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20062G562 List:
References
50-485-78-01, 50-485-78-1, NUDOCS 7812290253
Download: ML20062G568 (5)


Text

  • .

'

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region I Report N /78-01 Docket N License No. CPPR-156 Priority -

Category A Licensee: Rochester Gas ard Electric Cor Ea'st Avenue Rochester, Facility Name: Sterling Power Project Nuclear Unit N Inspection at: RG & E Corporate Offices and Sterling Power Project Site Inspection conducted: October 23-25, 1978 Inspectors: ,( % //[ s2 f W r C. Mattia, Reactor Inspector, Region I cate signed (.%~ Ilf t 3 lJE

' Oberg, Reactor Inspector, Region IV cate signed cate signed Approved by: / /7//h">. AN>/ e 'v/ V c rY R.' McGadgriy, Chfeff Projects Section, cate signed Reactor Constructton & Engineering Support Branch, RI Insoection Summary:

Inscection on October 23-25, 1978 (Recort No. 50 485/78-01)

Areas Ins::ected: Routine, unannounceo inspection by regional based inspectors of aspects of tne Quality Assurance Program relating to the control of design & procurement,;

documents and audits. An inspection was also conducted of the plant site. The ,

_'

inspection involved 28 on-site inspection-hours by two NRC regional based inspector .

Results: Of the three areas inspected, no items of nonconpliance were identifie Region I Form 12 ,

(Rev. A::ril 77)

781229 oAS.3 l

!

,-

_ _ . _ . _ ..

.

.

.

DETAILS Individuals Contacted Rocnester Gas & Electric Corooration (RG & E)

  • C. Anderson, QA Manager
  • R. Davis, Project QA Engineer
  • G. Goetz, Project Construction Engineer H. Mack, Document Control Supervisor
  • McCoy, Nuclear Project Manager

-

T. Weis, Site Project Engineer Project Status Engineering design is approximately 65% ccmplete and precurement 85% complete. The licensee has reviewed the constructor's (Bechtel)

QA program for site construction and comments are presently being incorporated or resolved. There is no change in the previously reported fuel load date (December, 1978) Evaluation of Audit program (Annual Review)

The IE inspector reviewed applicable records and held discussions with responsible personnel regarding the annual review and evaluaticn of the audit program. This is recuired by QA 1806GS, " Review of Audit Program," Rev. 2 (March 31,1978).

No items of r onccmpliance were identifie Review of Internal and External Audit program The IE inspector reviewed the Rochester Gas & Electric Company's audit program which pertains to the Sterling Project. The documents listed below were examined as part of this review:

QA 103GS " Management Review of the Quality Assurance 3/31/78 Program," Rev. 4 QA 20 LGS " Quality Assurance Group Organization and 6/1/77 '

Responsibilities," Rev. 7 QA lE0 LGS "Gualification of Auditing Personnel," 1/1/77 Rev. 5

.

k

. .

.

QA1802GS " Audit Scheduling and Planning," Rev. 6 3/31/78 QA 1803GS " Performance of Quality Assurance Audits 1/1/77 Rev. 3 QA 1804GS " Reporting and Follow Up of RG&E Audit 3/31/78 Findings," Rev. 5 Audit Serial Number Control Log (includes Ginna and Sterling Project audits) Audits 77 40:RD (October 25,1977) to present Internal Audit Schedule, Jan - Dec 1978, Rev. 2 (September, 13, 1978) (7 pages)

Qualification Certificates (and supporting dccuments) for four (4) qualified auditor Six (6) bi-monthly Audit Status Reports from November 1977 to September 1978 Audit Reports: 77-40:RD; 78-17:KE; 78-18:KE; 78-19:TM; & 78-34:KE (planonly)

The requirements of ANSI N45.2.12, the SNUPPS standard QA manual and 10 CFR 50, Appendix B were used to evaluate the RG&E QA procedure The IE inspector determined the following: Internal ano external audits are being conducted by qualified personne Audits are scheduled, planned, conducted and reported as required by approved procedure Audit results are reported and res;.onded to in a timely fashio Appropriate evaluations of QA programs are being made as require Status reports on audit results and audit foll's up are made to upper managemen Records of audits conducted are availabl No items of noncompliance were identifie i l

l

_ ______ ____ _ __

-

.

5. Desion Control The inspector reviewed the following licensee's procedures to determine compliance with PSAR cormittments and regulatory requirements:

QE 3085, Revision 5, Titled " Review of SNUPPS Design Documents, Including Standard Plant PSAR Revisions and Lead A/E sidders List."

QE 3125, Revision 1, Titled " Review of Site A/E Design Cocuments, Including Bidders Lists and Bid Evaluations."

No items of noncompliance were identifie The inspector randomly selected the following documents that have been reviewed by the licensee to determine compliance with the above established criteria:

PSARChange(PC)

or Techincal Specification (TS)

or RG&E Transmittal Bidders Evaluation (BE) Letter Date -

(BE) For 2" & Smaller Pipe supports 7/26/77 (TS) E-035 3/3/76 & 4/29/76 (TS) C-ll5 8/10/77 & 8/12/77 (TS)C-103 8/12/77 (TS)J-359 8/30/77 (TS)M-206A 7/8/77 (BE) For Preassembled Pipe Formations 9/28/77 (BE) For 2" & Smaller Pipe Supports 7/26/77 (PC) Change Notice 28-77 2/17/78 (TS) C-419 /20/77 No items of noncompliance were identifie . Facility Site Tour The inspectors toured the site for the Sterling Power Plant and noted essentially no site activity was occurring. No clearing of wooded areas had taken place with the exception of a :w trees along access roads which were removed sometime ago te permit drilling equipment to be brought on site (note: all soil boring activities have been completed).

No items of noncomoliance were identified.

"-

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

,. . . . .-

.

.- 5 . .

5 Exit Interview

'

The inspector met with licensee representatives denoted in paragraph i, on October 24 & 25, 1978. The inspector discussed the scope &

findings of this inspection. Attendees at these meetings included personnel whose names are indicated by notation (*) in paragraph 1.,

.

!

t l

.

I l

i

- _