IR 05000466/1979002

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-466/79-02 on 790508-11.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Procurement,Vendor Surveillance, Audits,Development of Site Procedures & Preparation for Site Civil Activities
ML19242A048
Person / Time
Site: Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png
Issue date: 05/16/1979
From: Beach A, Randy Hall, Hubacek W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML19242A042 List:
References
50-466-79-02, 50-466-79-2, NUDOCS 7907310126
Download: ML19242A048 (4)


Text

.

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION C.UICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION IV

Report No. 50-466/79-02 Docket No. 50-466 Category Al Licensee:

Hous*.on Lighting & Power Company

Post Office Box 1700 Houston, Texas 77001 Facility Name:

Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Station Inspection at: Houston, Texas Inspection conducted: May 8-11, 1979 Inspectors:

F J A 7#

,

'

.m

. Hubacek, Reactor Inspector, Projects Section pati (Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 7)

Af1 1J Y$(C Y0

,

a A. B. Beach, Reactor Inspector, Engineering Support Section Date (Paragraphs 2 & 6)

,

Approved:

Mr /

- -

jc

/

d. A. Crossman, Chief, Projects Section Da te /

l <W ah R. E. Hall, Chief, Engineering Support Section Ifa te/

'

Inspection Summarv:

Inspection on May 8-11, 1979 (Report No. 50-466/79-02)

Areas Inspected:

Special announced inspection of procurement, vendor surveillance,

'udits, development of site procedures, and preparation for site civil activities.

.e inspection involved forty-eight inspector-hours by two NRC inspectors.

Results: No deviations were identified.

790731012c

.

.

DETAILS

-

1.

Persons Contacted Principal Applicant Employees R. A. Frazar, Manager, Quality Assurance

  • P. A. Horn, Project Manager
  • W. N. Phillips, Projects QA Manager

S. A. Viaclovsky, Supervisor, Support Division

  • F. W. Stoerkel, Project QA Supervisor
  • T.

K. Logan, Site QA Supervisor

  • P. A. Swearingen, General Supervisor, Records Management System M. Mouser, Supervising Project Engineer H. G. Overstreet, Lead QA Specialist L. Richards, Licensing Engineur D. Varner, Project Purchasing Manager V. Perret, Lead Electrical Engineer D. L. Carathers, Nuclear Engineering
  • denotes those attending the exit intcrview.

The IE inspectorr also interviewed other licensee and contractor employees during the course of the inspection.

2.

Procurement

>

The IE inspectors reviewed the procurement files for the following equipment:

Class IE 480 Volt Power Center - Inouiry HOU 5237 Pipe Hangers and Supports - Inquiry HOU 5226 Mechanical Piping Penetrations - Inquiry HOU 5204 The documents reviewed included:

Ccatract Specifications Bidders List of Potential Suppliers Inquiries Proposals from the Potenti.l Suppliers Records of Reviews and Comments The documents reviewed were observed to be in accordance with the Purchasing Department's "Pewer Plant Procurement Procedures."

No deviations were identified.

-2-

.

,,

I f\\

4U'

~

.

3.

@ dits The IE inspector reviewed relected ext 2rnal audits performed by the applicant to ascertain whether they were prepared acd performed in accordance with re-quirements contained in procedure QAP-5, " Audit Procedure."

The following audit reports were reviewed:

CBI-3, audit of Chicago Bridge & Iron QA program and program implementa-tion, performed March 29, 1979, and April 11, 1979 GE-4, audit of General Electric Engineering, performed February 20-23, 1?79 The IE inspector also reviewed corrective actions related to the above reports.

No deviations were identified.

4.

Vendor Surveillance The IE inspector reviewed a Vendor Surveillance Report which documented surveil-lance of the Anchor Darling Valve Co. on April 2-3, 1979, by Houston Lighting and Power Co. (HL&P) and General Electric Co. (GE) quality assurance representa-tives. No substantive problems were identified in the surveillance report. The report was observed to be prepared in accordance with HL&P Procedure QAP-3,

" Surveillance Procedure."

The IE inspector was informed that negotiatious with GE for wituess points on NSSS components is nearing completion.

HL&P plans to establish an annual audit program supplemented by final inspection / records review prior to shipment of GE items manufactured at San Jose, California, and Wilmington, North Carolina.

Witness points for vendor supplied items vill be established using a modified previous notification list and the master parts list.

No deviations were identified.

5.

, Review of Quality Control Procedures The IE inspector reviewco tha following Ebasco Quality Control Procedures to ascertain whether PSAR commitments were met:

QCP-1.1, " Quality Control Organization and Respoasibilites," Rev. 0; January 2,1979 QCP-2.1, " Indoctrination, Training and Qualification of Quality Control Personnel," Rev. O, Janua ry 2, 1979 QCP-3.1, " Verification of Design Change," Rev. O, Janaury 2, 1979 QCP-6.1, " Preparation, Review and Approval of Quality Control Precedures, Rev. O, Janua ry 2, 1979 QCP-6.2, " Document Control," Rev. J, Janua ry 2,1979-3-7E9

, p,.

L-

_

_.

_

_ _ _ _

.

..

,,

QCP-7.1, " Materials Receiving and Inspection," Rev. O, January 2, 1979

-

QCP-10.1, " Soils Inspection," Rev. O, January 2, 1979 QCP-10.3, "Cadweld Inspection," Rev. O, January 2, 1979 No deviations were identified.

6.

Preparation for Site Civil Activities The IE inspector reviewed the following procedures to ascettain whether or.not the requirements of Section 3.8 of the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report were being met.

The procedures reviewed included:

a.

Ebasco Specification 602, " Concrete Masonry" b.

Ebasco Construction Site Procedure CSP-4, " Concrete Placement" c.

Ebasco Quality Control Procedures QCP-10.4, " Batch Plant Inspection" QCP-10 ', "Preplacement Concrete Inspection" QCP-10.6, " Concrete Placement Inspection" QCP-10.7, " Post Placement Concrete Inspection" QCP-10.25, " Concrete Materials Testing" d.

Ebasco Site QA Procedure QAS-12, " Civil Activities Audit" e.

Civil Discipline Manual No deviations were identified.

7.

Exit Intetview The IE inspectors met with applicant representatives (denoted in paragraph 1)

at the conclusion of the inspection on May 11, 1979.

The IE inspectors summarized the purpose and scope of the inspection and the findings.

-4-E!//

?% 7 ci u s a