IR 05000456/2013006

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Mid-Cycle Assessment Letter (IR 05000456-13-006 & 05000457-13-006)
ML13246A189
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/03/2013
From: Eric Duncan
Region 3 Branch 3
To: Pacilio M
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
References
IR-13-006
Download: ML13246A189 (6)


Text

ber 3, 2013

SUBJECT:

MID-CYCLE ASSESSMENT LETTER FOR BRAIDWOOD STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 (REPORT 05000456/2013006 AND 05000457/2013006)

Dear Mr. Pacilio:

On August 14, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff completed its mid-cycle performance review of Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2. The NRC reviewed the most recent quarterly performance indicators (PIs) in addition to inspection results and enforcement actions from July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013. This letter informs you of the NRCs assessment of your facility during this period and its plans for future inspections at your facility.

The NRC determined that the performance at Braidwood Station, Unit 1 during the most recent quarter, as well as the previous three quarters of the assessment period, was within the Licensee Response column of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) Action Matrix, because all inspection findings had very low safety significance (i.e., Green) and all PIs indicated your performance was within the normal, expected range (i.e., Green).

The NRC determined that the performance at Braidwood Station, Unit 2 for the first two quarters of the assessment period was within the Regulatory Response column of the NRCs Action Matrix, because although all inspection findings had very low (i.e., Green) safety significance, one performance indicator was White and therefore required additional NRC oversight.

Specifically, the Mitigating Systems Performance Index for the Cooling Water Systems crossed the Green-White threshold and caused Braidwood Unit 2 to transition from the Licensee Response column to the Regulatory Response column of the ROP Action Matrix in the second quarter of 2012.

This White performance indicator issue was closed on November 30, 2012, as documented in our letter to you dated December 27, 2012 [ML12362A257]. As a result, Braidwood Unit 2 returned to the Licensee Response column of the ROP Action Matrix as of the date of that letter.

Braidwood Unit 2 remained in the Licensee Response column for the remainder of the assessment period. Therefore, the NRC plans to conduct ROP baseline inspections at your facility. The NRC also plans to conduct infrequently performed inspection activities related to the operation of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation using Inspection Procedure 60855.1, Operation of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation at Operating Plants.

The NRC identifies substantive cross-cutting issues (SCCIs) to communicate a concern with the licensees performance in a cross-cutting area and to encourage the licensee to take appropriate actions before more significant performance issues emerge. The NRC identified a cross-cutting theme in the Corrective Action Program component of the Problem Identification and Resolution cross-cutting area. Specifically, there were four findings identified to have a cross-cutting aspect in the area of problem evaluation and resolution, P.1(c), during the assessment period. The NRC determined that a SCCI associated with P.1(c) does not exist because, at this time, the NRC does not have a concern with your staffs planned scope of effort and initial progress in addressing the cross-cutting theme. In reviewing your efforts to date, the NRC noted that you recently performed a comprehensive apparent cause evaluation that identified a number of areas for improvement for which you prescribed corrective actions to address. These corrective actions should be implemented in a timely manner and be maintained for a sufficient time to demonstrate that they have been effective in addressing the causes for the cross-cutting theme. The NRC will continue to closely monitor your staffs progress in implementing these corrective actions until the theme criteria are no longer met.

The enclosed inspection plan lists the inspections scheduled through December 31, 2014.

Routine inspections performed by resident inspectors are not included in the inspection plan.

The inspections listed during the last nine months of the inspection plan are tentative and may be revised at the end-of-cycle performance review. The NRC provides the inspection plan to allow for the resolution of any scheduling conflicts and personnel availability issues. The NRC will contact you as soon as possible to discuss changes to the inspection plan should circumstances warrant any changes. This inspection plan does not include security-related inspections, which will be sent via separate, non-publicly available correspondence.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). Please contact me at 630-829-9620 with any questions you may have regarding this letter or the inspection plan.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Eric R. Duncan, Chief, Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-456; 50-457 License Nos. NPF-72; NPF-77 Enclosure: Braidwood Station Inspection/Activity Plan cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ'