IR 05000329/1978018
| ML19261B574 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 01/08/1979 |
| From: | Barrett P, Maxwell G, Spessard R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19261B571 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-329-78-18, 50-330-78-18, NUDOCS 7902280224 | |
| Download: ML19261B574 (4) | |
Text
.
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY CO:01ISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
U Report No. 50-329]78-18; 50-330/78-18-r
-
Docket No. 50-329; 50-330 License No. CPPR-81; CPPR-82 Licensee:
Consumers Power Company 1945 West Parnall Road Jackson, MI 49201 Facility Name: Midland Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Inspection At:
Bechtel, Ann Arbor, MI Inspection Conducted:
November 30 - December 1, 1978
..
b) ict Inspectors:
G. F. Ma ell
/' 8 ' 7 '/
f"Y,21u~~TI
/' c~7
'
P. A. Barrett
'
' k j, q'h <,2 7 4rM
/!' j '7 9 Approved By.
R. '.. Spessard, Chief
/
Engineering Support Section 1 Inspection Summary Inspection on November 30 - December 1, 1978 (Report No. 50-329/78-18; 50-330/78-18)
Areas Inspected: Quality records review for electrical cables and components. This inspection involved a total of 24 inspector-hours at the Bechtel Ann Arbor, Michigan office by two NRC inspectors.
Results:
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
790228022f
.
DETAILS Persons Contacted Principal Licensdb Emplo2.-'
.-
_
.
B. W. Marguglio, $1 rector QA 4f W. R. Bird, Section Head QE M. J. Schaeffer, QAE P. W. Jacobsen, QAE Becttel Personnel J. Milandin, QA Manager E. Rumbaugh, Manager of Engineering W. Moring, LQAE A. E. Bice, QAE R. Baltazar, Project Quality Engineer J. R. McBride, Quality Engineer P. Gray, Project SQR G. Richardson, Staf f QAE C. Dart, QE W. Keysers Manager M&QS R. L. Castleberry, Project Engineer R. C. Ash, Project Purchasing Agent C. J. Buhl, Supplier Quality Manager All of the above personnel were present at the exit interview.
Licensee Actions Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55(e)
The Rill inspector discussed and reviewed the program established by the licensee, to evaluate the potentially inadequate qualifica-tion testing of safety related equipment. The potential inadequacy was reported on November 13, 1978, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55(e).
The licensee documented the objective to implement the program on the Position Objective Program dated January 30, 1978 (Position Objective No. 4).
The licensee stated that the scope of the program will consist of a re-review of the seismic and environmental qualifications of all applicable safety related equipment (electrical, mechanical, structural, and civil) for the Midland plants.
The program,
-2-
documented as the Components qualification Review dated November 10, 1978, specified the administrative and quality control mechanisms which would be followed to assure complete Pertinent training for all personnel and adequate reviews.
involved was documented to have been conducted on November 16, The re-revjeu performed by Bechtel Engineering - Ann Arbor 1976.
At that time, all inadequa-should be complete,by January, 1979.
identified and controlled in accordance with the
_
cies will be
'
Consumers Power Company
,
Midland site Quality Assurance program.
the activities to assure the accuracy, completeness,
-.
will audit This matter will be reviewed during subsequent and effectiveness.
inspections in accordance with the routine inspection program-No items of noncompliance were identified.
Functional or Program Areas Inspected Quality Records for Electrical Cables and Components On November 30 - December 1, 1978, the RIII inspectors visited the Bechtel Ann Arbor, Michigan of fice to review quality documentation which could not be readily reviewed during routine site inspections. Most of the records, which were reviewed, were those documents related to Class 1E electrical of RIII Inspection equipment discussed in the Details ser ~
'r Reports 50-329/73-04 and 78-02 and 50 78-04 and 78-02.
The inspector reviewed the documentation supplied by 1.
Burndy-Husky, relative to cable tray supplied by them for installation at Midland Units 1 and 2.
The documents were found to indicate compliance with the applicable Bechtel 1,
Specification requirements; Spec. 7220-E-55, Rev.
7.3.2, 7.3.4, 7.4.1 and 8.2.
The inspector Paragraphs cable trays for Midland Units 1 and 2 were/are noted that purchased as safety-related Class lE equipment.
not 50-329/78-04 and Further, RIII Inspection Reports No.
50-330/78-04 have identified raceway and grounding systems of the Midland Project Q-List (the as not being a part architect-engineer's euphemism for safety related systems).
IE headquarters was notified of the nonsafety related and categorization of the raceway and grounding system;,
IE has requested that the Office of Nuclear Reactor of this categorization.
Regulation (hRR) review the i= pact RIII inspector has no furtner questions pending com-ii.a pletion of NRR's review.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
-3-
,
.
2.
The inspectors reviewed the documentation supplied by the manufacturers for the following:
a.
Station Power Transformers IX-17, 1X-18, 2X-17 and 2X-18.
R b.
480 voli load centers 1B-17, IB-18, 2B-17 and 2B-18.
e-
E7 c.
480 volt motor control centers 1B43, 1B44, 2B43 and 2B44.
The documents were compared with the applicable Bechtel Specification requirements:
Spec. 7220-E-6(Q), Rev. 7, Paragraphs 8.1.5 and 8.1.6.a; Spec. 7220-E-7, Rev. 5; Spec. 7220-C-7, Rev. 4; and material requisition No. 7220-E-7-AC, Rev. 7.
The documents were in the form of certifications, drawings (i.e., ITE Imperial drawings #84-56122-20 through #84-56122-23 sheet 1 of 1, Rev. 3), and Gould Seismic Report #SC-140, Rev. 4 (for the above motor control centers only).
The Rill inspector review excluded the concerns identified in the 10 CFR 50.55(e) item addressed above, (i.e.,
seismic and environmental documentation was not reviewed).
The seismic and environmental documentation for the above equipment, and other equipment will be reviewed at the completion of licensee's re-review program.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
Exit Interview The inspectors met with corporate and site staff representatives (denoted under Persons Contacted) at the conclusion of the inspection on December 1, 1978. The inspectors summarized the purpose and findings of the inspection.
The licensee acknowledged the findings reported herein.
_4_