IR 05000312/1993004
| ML20056F021 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 08/11/1993 |
| From: | Wong H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20056F002 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-312-93-04, 50-312-93-4, NUDOCS 9308250419 | |
| Download: ML20056F021 (22) | |
Text
i
-
.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION V
Report No.:
50-312/93-04 Docket No.:
50-312 License No.:
DPR-54 Licensee:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District 14440 Twin Cities Road Herald, California 95538-9799 Facility Name:
Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station Inspection and Meeting at:
Herald, California (Rancho Seco Site)
Inspection Conducted:
July 15,1993 Meeting Conducted:
July 27,1993 Inspector:
P. Qualls, Region V Inspector k// bf
'
Approved by:
H.'J.Wong, Chief (/'~
Date Signed Reactor ProjectsSection II Sumary:
!
A management meeting was conducted on July 27, 1993, to discuss the current i
status of activities at Rancho Seco. A copy of the slides presented during the meeting are attached. An announced inspection was conducted on July 15,
!
1993, to review plant operations.
'
Safety Issues Manacement System (SIMS) Items: None.
Results General Conclusions and Specific Findinas:
Through plant tours, discussions with various SMUD personnel, and review of plant logs, the inspector concluded that licensee personnel were maintaining i
plant equipment, including fire protection equipment, in a good condition and
!
that plant personnel morale continued to be good.
The inspector noted that reductions in personnel and capabilities of the plant fire brigade were planned. The inspector discussed the proposed staff manning
,
I with SMUD management related to this reduction and noted that this issue would l
be a topic of additional discussion in the upcoming NRC/SMUD management meeting on July 27, 1993.
!
9308250419 930811 Il PDR ADOCK 05000312 [g]
PDR G
-
_
.
_... _
_ _,
.
.
.
.
.
.
Sionificant Safety Matters: None.
-
Summary of Violations or Deviations: None.
Unresolved items: None.
j t
!
i
?
.
l
!
.-
.
_
.
.
.
..
_....
. _.
_ _ _.
. _ _.
-
-.
_ _ _
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
,
.
.
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Meetino Attendees j
Sacramento Municioal Utility District (SMUD)
J. Shetler, Deputy Assistant General Manager, Operations i
)
- S. Redeker, Manager, Plant Decomissioning D. Brock, Manager, Nuclear Maintenance D. Gardiner, Acting Superintendent, Radiation Protection / Chemistry
J. Field, Acting Manger, Technical Services
K. Miller, Project Manager, Decomissioning/ fuel Disposition j
- J. Delezinski, Super Mer, Quality Assurance, l.icensing, Administration i,
!
D. Tipton, Rancho Se. 3perations l
E. Nava, Rancho Seco Security Nuclear Reaulatory Comission (NRC)
S. Richards, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Safety and Projects F. Wenslawski, Deputy Director, Division of Radiation Safety
and Safeguards
!
,
H. Wong, Chief, Reactor ProjectsSection II J. Reese, Chief, Facilities ladiation Protection Branch
!
M. Cillis, Senior Radiation Specialist P. Qualls, Non-Power Reactor Inspector j
Denotes personnel in attendance at the Exit meeting held with i
P. Qualls on July 15, 1993.
'(
During the inspection conducted on July IS, and during the site tour by l
NRC managers on July 27, 1993, various plant personnel were interviewed i
l l
including plant management, shift supervisors, control roor. operators,
!
l and radiation protect 4. personnel.-
{
2.
Manaaement Meetina i
Openino Remarks On July 27, 1993, NRC and SMUD management representatives met at'the
!
Rancho Seco site to discuss the overall status of the licensee's programs i
and included: long range planning, organization and staffing, plant l
!
status, radwaste activities, and regulatory status.
Mr. Richards and Mr. Shetler provided introductions for the meeting and noted appreciation for the opportunity to routinely discuss the status of activities at Rancho Seco.
Lono Ranae Plan l
l Mr. Shetler sumarized the current status of the hearings related to the intervention by the Environmental Conservation Organization. Three areas l
l are being reviewed: (1) decomissioning funding, (2) loss of offsite power, and (3) adequacy of the NRC staff's environmental review of the L
i
!
..
-
~
.
,_
_
..~.,__ U
,
l
.
Rancho Seco Decommissioning Plan. Mr. Shetler stated that a pre-hearing conference was scheduled for the October / November 1993 timeframe.
,
,
Mr. Shetler stated that plant activities are generally oriented toward preparations for Custodial SAFSTOR, which should essentially be achieved in Fall 1993. Hardened SAFSTOR would follow Custodial SAFSTOR and would occur when all spent fuel is removed from the spent fuel pool and stored in dry storage assemblies [ Interim Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)], in approximately 1998.
Deferred DECON would follow in approximately 2008 with license termination around 2011.
Mr. Shetler stated that decommission funding contributions still continued at $12 million per year and that SMUD was conducting yearly reassessments of the estimated decommissioning costs to determine if Mr. Shetler also stated that certain funding changes were necessary.
expenses related to decommissioning had already been incurred although
.
there have been no withdrawals from tDe decommissioning fund.
!
Withdrawals would commence when the Decommissioning Order is issued by the NRC.
Orcanization and Staffino Mr. Shetler cescribed planned changes to the Rancho Seco organization in which day-to-day operations would be under the Plant Manager (S. Redeker), with supervisors and superintendents reporting to the Plant The Plant Manager would report to the Deputy Assistant General Manager.
The target date for implementation of Manager, Operations (J. Shetler). Current Rancho Seco staffing is at 154 this organization is Fall 1993.
Mr. Shetler employees with a target of 142 employees by the end of 1993.
indicated that this staffing level would be the approximate staff size to support Custodial SAFSTOR. Larger staff reductions were anticipated when all spent fuel is in dry storage.
Plant Status Mr. Redeker stated that system reports and punchlists had been completed for establishing plant SAFSTOR conditions and that plant equipment configuration control was being maintained. Mr. Redeker indicated that while no major components had been removed from the plant, SMUD was evaluating purchase bids for the diesel generators.
Mr. Redeker also described planned changes to the fire protection SMUD plans to reduce the current three-person fire brigade, j
program.
capable of fighting interior building fires, to a two-person " incipient"
!
fire team which would respond to minor fires not requiring fire fighting protection equipment (SCBA or thermal gear). The Herald Volunteer Fire Department would be relied on to perform primary fire fighting duties.
SMUD performed a 50.59 evaldation and concluded based on the reduced fire and radiological hazards at Rancho Seco, the reduction was not significant. SMUD considerations included: that the affects of a fire on the fuel assemblies in the spent fuel pool was minimal, all lube oil had been removed, the diesel fuel oil had been removed, transformers with
__.
!
'
,
PCBs were being removed, radiological waste was minimal, and that all fire protection equipment and systems (i.e., hose stations, fire extinguishers, and Cardox systems for diesel generator and electrical l
switchgear rooms) were being maintained.
SMUD intended to implement this
,
l change on August 6, 1993.
Mr. Redeker also described a proposed change for radiation protection (RP) coverage during backshift hours.
In place of a RP technician on the l
l backshift, SMUD proposes to use an "RP Responder" (operations personnel)
to take initial actions in response to an RP event on the backshift.
Additional personnel would be available, if required, on a call-in basis.
This change would require a change to the Emergency Plan and approval by l
the NRC. SMUD submitted a description of the proposed change in a letter
,
dated July 12, 1993. The SMUD target date for implementation of the change is mid-October 1993. With this change, minimum staffing was stated to be three in operations and four in security.
Radioactive Waste i
Mr. Redeker indicated that most low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) had
'
Projections are to process and store been removed from Rancho Seco.
approximately 2544 cubic feet of LLRW in 1993 and approximately 300 cubic feet in 1994, for a total stored volume of LLRW of approximately 2844 cubic feet. The building's storage capacity is over 50,000 cubic feet.
.
Reculatory Status Mr. Delezinski discussed the pending submittals awaiting NRC approval.
These submittals included: an exemption from Price-Anderson liability
,
'
insurance requirements; decommissioning funding plan; decommissioning plan; ISFSI license; Emergency Plan change; and an exemption from the training rule.
Closino Remarks In response to an NRC question, SMUD personnel stated that they were keeping current with the revision to 10 CFR Part 20 and had been to several utility meetings to discuss implementation of the revision.
SMUD management also indicated that additional significant personnel reductions were not planned until after the spent fuel had been removed from the spent fuel pool (dry storage).
Staffing at that time would be approximately 30 people. Mr. Richards stated his appreciation for the discussion during the meeting which allowed the NRC to more fully understand the status of Rancho Seco.
3.
Plant Operations Observations (7]7021 a.
Plant Statug u
The plant remains in a defueled status with activities to support decommissioning continuing. The inspector toured the Control Room, Spent Fuel Building, Auxiliary Building, Technical Support Center,
_ _ _
i
'
.
and Spent Fuel Pooling Cooling areas.
The inspector noted that fire protection equipment appeared to be well-maintained and that plant housekeeping was being maintained.
b.
Fire Protection The licensee is currently maintaining a three-person fire brigade, but (as discussed in Paragraph 2 above) licensee management stated that they planed to delete this requirement from the fire protection program.
Licensee management also stated that the operations staff was being trained to provide both backshift radiation protection support and to operate the security monitors in the control room.
Licensee management indicated that their current plan was to maintain as a minimum three operations personnel in addition to
,
security personnel. SMUD management concluded that three operations personnel were adequate to respond to any possible plant emergency.
c.
Scent Fuel Pool Leakaae The inspector discussed the licensee's Spent Fuel Pool leakage l
monitoring program with licensee management.
Licensee management l
stated that the program was still in use. Leakage remained low with
!
no discernable increase noted.
I d.
Station Mannino The inspector reviewed the site manning with licensee management and noted that the number of personnel was consistent with numbers
previously provided to NRC management. The staffing appeared adequate to comply with current NRC requirements and commitments.
e.
Control Room The inspector observed that the control room staff conducted operations in formal professional manner. The inspector reviewed station logs for the period May 9 through July 14, 1993. The l
inspector noted that the logs were neat and provided an adequate record of licensee activities, f.
Plant Tour The inspector completed a tour of the site on July 15, 1993. The areas inspected included the Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System, Spent Fuel Pool Building, Diesel Driven Fire Pump, Control Room, Tank Farm, Switch pear Rooms, the Battery Rooms, and radiologically
.
controlled area of the Auxiliary Building. The inspector noted that, in general, housekeeping was good and that the equipment material condition appeared to be good. The fire protection equipment appeared to have been maintained.
,
The inspector noted that the morale of the plant workers appeared to be good and that they appeared to be doing their work using written
,
.
v
-
-v
.
.
'
procedures.
The inspector observed the licensee conducing impact tests of a one-quarter scale model of a spent fuel storage cask. The tests were conducted in a controlled and professional manner.
g.
Exit Meetino An exit meeting was conducted on July 15, 1993 with members of the SMUD staff to discuss the findings of the inspection as summarized above.
,
.
RANCHO SECO NUCLEAR STATION
!
REGION V
NRC BRIEFING
-
v.,
,
rs-q g(,, -
y(
AGENDA
,,
)
>
-
/
,f--
l.
/,u
<
,
--
c,,-
h,&g/* T'
-
,./~
p
- LONG RANGE PLAN s /' '
t
- ^3 IN,
- ORGANIZATION & STAFFING
,
-.J
,..
....'......, k
- PLANT STATUS
,e" ~fY q
'*
'
'
- gE."2 ) m---- 3]
- RADIOACI'IVE WASTE
,i
\\4
... ~.~.
g,( /p'
e.
pf'
-
oo
- REGULATORY STATUS
'
'
"" 2_ '
f,
_
.,, +
..,
k
,v
, m.
c,)
y/
x s C{
a - - -.
p
--
%
.
r=
-
=m
_-
..
........
.
- ")
i % /f' K Ng:f/
JULY 27,1993 y,x.1 4 %
n,
=r-
,
,
'
v'
A
'
y-t,
\\. s,
- _( L'
s i
-
s.
-
'g
-
>:/1N m r,.
.
/
A
-
-
.
$SMUD SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
-
-
-
- - -
-
_
-
._.
.-
.__ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- - _ _.
. - - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _
. - - _ - _
-.
_ - _ - -
_
.
!
-
7 _. _..
.
-
-
.
..
j 91 f)fl41C RANCHO SECO LONG RANGE PLAN
.
.
l
.
l
!,
]
l
.
'
l 1991 g1992 j l993 jl994 l1995 l1996 j 1397 jl998 jl999 j2000l 2001 j
, [2007l 2008j 2009[ 2010l 2011 l 2012 l 2013l 2014 l
!
<
,
F DECOMMISSIONING:;
-
.._.
..
.-...
'
i
. Decommissioning Plan f
t Preparation I
(+J--C
.
. Custodial SAFSTOR
,
.
I O-- c( '
'm I!
)
i License Terrm..neted.
i
. liardened SAFSTOH
..
.
)y
.
^,
Deterred DECON l
C
,
c l
i
+
r e
. site Restoration
,
g i
o o 'ite j
-
l Restored
>
j Funding Period [
,
f f-J e
i
FUEL DISPOSAL:
.
i
-
.
O I
i e Design \\ Construct ISFSI [
P I
'
. Site Specific iSFSI Licencef O
l
.
. 1 l
l
. DOE Demo Project C
'
.
Load Remaining Canisters C
b Fuel Transferred To DOd Fuel Storage /
C fJ
>
.
Monitoring i
\\
f i
k
a
!
!h
'
a I
i
-
.. _ _
__- -
-
. i;,
i I_
.
._
-
..__._.:-=
_.
. _ _.... _.
.
i n:.,
l
.
.
..
..
-. -.
---
-- - -
-..
-
. -..
.. -
,
--
p 4.-
+
J-m ae a
.
u
- _ _ -
4-_.
g
--a
..
M
. w,v
<.. <
e a
..,v.,,
M oe i
Q
,
s I
'
Q i
A
'
I
.
!
i 0O
D
i, U)
~,..
.
e
0 i
.
n
it
'
i U
l h
C
,l I
i
!
E N
t i
N i
P t
%
h a
s
!!
U i
a
.>
IAi
.
$
.b k,jJ i
,
'
!
h
'
"
w i
!
$
t
l
n
.i N
L I
i
2L i
l
<44 l
!
i s
i
i!
0 mi
.
a (
h
<
.
if
l
!,
O
!,
,
$
<
i
!
s
.
s y,
i s
!
i
!
e I
k
,
u
st i
}c y
kj
!
%
5
)
,
s p
u
'
h I
h n
,- - - - =n=,==w
_. _.
., _ _ _ _ _ _. _.,.
_
, _.
,.r_
_ _,._..-... _.,...,.,,., _....,... _,..,,. _ _. _,.. _ _.,. _ _ _.... _.. _
..
.
-
-
.
.
_.
.u
. -. -....
. _...... - _....
... -
..
.
.
ono:
Rf CURRENT NUCLEAR ORGANIZATION
.
GENERAI, MANAGER S. David Freeman I
<
,
AGM & CIIIEF OPS.
'
-]
omCER Nuclear Quality Concerns g
y,, g
>
'
MSRC l
l DEPUTY l
AGM, NUCI, EAR l
Jim Shetler l
l
>
'
I r
I l
STAFF
'- PRC'
l I
l
.,
SUPPORT l
I
'
g
- Fuel Disposition g
- Decommissioning i
i l
I i
I I
I
!
MANAGER, MANAGER, RP/EM/EP/CIIEM OPERATIONS /
MANAGER,
_!
TECIINICAL MAINTENANCE MANAGER SECURITY QA/ LICENSING /
.
SERVICES MANAGER ADMIN
- Mechanical -
- Radiation Protection
- Operations
- Quality
- Mechanical Systems.
- Electrical
- Chemistry
- Security
- 1.icensing
- Electrical / I AC Systems
'
'
- Instruments & Controls
- Fmergency Planning
- Training
- Administrative
- Document Control
- Emuents t
- Scheduling
- Recorils
- General Employee Training.
'
Environmental Monitoring
.
'
I Page 4
.
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _. -.. -..,
... -. -. -. -.. -. -..
-...
- -... - -
.
-. -., -. -, _
- - -
_
.
-
rgo PA-186 NUCLEAR ORGANIZATION GENERAL, MANAGER S. Desid Frecusan I
AGM & ClllEF OPS.
OFFICER leo Fassler I
DEPUTY AGM, OPERATIONS
Qu it 15 e l MSRC lll
PIANT MANAGER g
Steve Redeker g
'
I
,
l
>
l!
STAFF l
PRC SUPPORT I
Fuel Disposition g
-
Decommissioning
-
Training
,
-
i l
i QUAI.lTY/
TECilNICAl, SECUR11Y g
MAINTENANCE RP/EM/EP/CilEM OPERATIONS LICENSING /ADMIM - g SERVICES SUPERVISOR
'
SUPERINTENDENT SUPERINTENDENT SUPERINTENDENT SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR
t Radiation Protection
- Oper1stions
- Quality
- Mechanical Systems
- Security
- Mechemical
-
Chemistry-lJcensing
- Electrical /I&C
- Electrkel
-
Emergency Planning
- Administralise Systems
- Instruments &
Document Control Controls
- Emuents
'
General Eniployee
- Reamis
- Scheduling
-
Training
,
- Environmental Monitoring
_ _ _ _ _ _.
_ _ _.
__
_
-e.-,
m.%.
m-
%emism.,.e.-
-en-=wsw.-
J.
N g.
I
.--
-
-
-
r cr,
.
., -..
- -..., _, -
.
_ _ _ _ - -
-
.
.
.
._
-
.. -..
F1ancho Seca - 7/27/93 aaaaa i;ws pm:nmawammatszemsaxsemmumm.:2wranza we anetcuamammamsraasaansammrammmeasww.s n 2
-
D
n Pi PROJECTED STAFFING i
li-
!i AREAS CURRENT 12/31/93 (DECOM)
-
a
o
I DAGM, NUCLEAR
4 a
,
y
,
n il QA/LIC/ ADMIN
19
,
i
!
$
MAINTENANCE
35 h
a
'
^
d OPERATIONS
26
-
,
!!
l u
y SECURITY
29
,
8yt i
RP/EM/EP/ CHEM
19 i
,,
if
!
M TECH SERVICES
10 u
-
n
a
'
i TOTAL 154 142
o k
<
$p_..~.
i
.
-mmm,-
-- - - -,,.,4-m.,,.m.,-
~...,__
.--,--,-m--~-
- -, -
.,, ~..
- -,--
-
i Pogo 6
1 a
I
+ - * -
-
e..--e
-.
_, _. -
._
,. _, _ _ _ _ _,,
aa.a-a,_,k
- _,
.
IN
'
M e
.
D l
f\\
s.
a
,
S OO
.m
R W
O
4 o
b
$b
{
c n
.
h h
'
D2
.
N I
l m
i.
_
hk l
?
m
!!$
. l b
l ll
!
t
.
i F
i
-
,
l 1,
m
!.
)
-s
,
j Z
i (
!
!
1 t
m.
B.
!
>
s
..
y a
f h,
I e
,:
h
!
I p!
t ih I
e r
N I
u 1:
I s
Nm ss
$1'".:'JEN~tm2:?>r'.50E3%"W a '
.
-. -
...-..
_ _
.. _ -.... _...... _.... _., _.,. _., _ _ _...... -..... -.
- -.. _,... -
_ _
._m
...
-._
_
._.___.-..____._..._____.._...._.._____._...._.._._..m._
_. _. _. _ _... _.. _ _. _ _ _. _. -
,
-
Rancho Seco - 7/27/93 r %mn.
ai=m;mmrxwwwmsemwMusnummm snwwwtun%**xsutuvuw;u 3.nmstuu~
- "
,
a hk
'
l{
PLANT STATUS Il
!!
O SAFSTOR PROGRAM - PREPARING FOR CUSTODIAL u
)j AND H ARDENED SAFSTOR ii SYSTEM SAFSTOR REPORTS -- COMPLETE
!i
-
ri li SYSTEM PUNCHLISTS -- NEAR COMPLETE
-
N ll
ASSET RECOVERY PROGR AM a
.
f
DECOMMISSIONING FIRE PROTECTION PLAN
N 2-M AN INCIPIENT FIRE TEAM D
-
is
,
'
h EXPANDED HAND HELD FIRE EXTINGUISHER TRAINING
-
e Q
O RADIOACTIVE WATER PROCESSING
'
ujf
.
O MODIFICATIONS l4
,
!j!
O RP RESPONDER PROGRAM
,
.. - -
,
. _ - -
.. -
.
-
~
n
,
..;
l Page 8
-
...
.
-
-
- -
-.
- -
, _ - -. - _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _
-
._,_.
_
Rancho Seco - 7/27/93 m :/c vem annamwnneu;mwamrawn senwmewwmmcas ra v;; z
..,
ga m m a h sersw ma w m ll RP RESPONDER PROGRAM
,
i li
!
N
'
$
ALLOWED BY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
!
!!
!!
!!
O OPERATORS AS RP RESPONDERS uf FORMALLY TRAINED & QUALIFIED IN ALL TASKS BY
}
-
'
lh ANSI TECHS / RP SUPERVISION H
RESPONSIBILITIES, AUTHORITIES AND TASKS CLEARLY
^
H
-
!!.
DEFINED
Li PLANT CONDITIONS DURING B ACK SHIFT
STATIC I!
-
I!
INITI AL RESPONSE TO ABNORMAL RADIOLOGICAL
^,
-
si CONDITIONS i
i il R AC / ANSI QUALIFIED RP PERSONNEL ON-CALL WITH 2
?l
-
}
HOUR ON-SITE RESPONSE TIME
.'
1,
!!
il O
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE te
NRC APPROVAL REQUIRED
-
U'I 3 CHEM /RP DECOM TECHNICIANS AVAILABLE FOR l
-
CALL-IN u
,-
s.
<
g- _ _ _,_ _ m - _ _,- - -..-~
- - m.- -
~,m _ --
i Page 9 l
..
.
..
-
. -
-
-
-
-
.
,
. _-
.
-.
-
-
.
....
..
.
4 J
'
{
~
~-
g l.
n
,
-
m
>
x o
<
N D
k
s
,
i I
I
'
O i
O
,
Q
<
b
,
c4
- <
4 C
y
'
u
o t
- )
!
e u
e
,
Q g
y
)
-.
..
3 a'i
r
)
f x
h f-
W E
'
!
N
$
a
b.:5 I
e I
J O
l 0mg
.
A
'
i
>
st
.
M i
.
t
.
h
i N
i a$
f p
,
-
h I
.
.
,
.
.
.
$
k..
.
.
t
Y y
,
I Sl
y$
e t
.
h a
,
]
I3
.
a
- ,
,
h
-
w
.
5,
,
?
t m
e N
N
?b Y
s s
.
a y
M l-
a
i i
I d,
i e
a
.
%::,,e==mk a
..
. -.
..... -..
. -....
.
..
...
..
.
_,.. _,, _,.. - _.... _.. _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _..
.
.
.
.
.
..m..
_..
. _...
Rancho Seco - 7/27/93
.n;x -
gwzuwimaanauem nwwnswnswwma:mmmvmaamawnte,mamuracunstmum sa 'w
.>
.,..
eliU i
li 1992 LLRW TOTALS
!
>
i g
h
[j O
VOLUME REDUCTION 3,183 FT SHIPPED
,
n
,
SHIPPED TO VOLUMEREDUCTION CONTRACTOR p
-
!!
!
'
!!
O DIRECT DISPOSAL 1,234 FT SHIPPED
i
!s,
!
a BLENDER /DR YER DRUMS 125 DRUMS SHIPPED
- Q
-
fi3 i
$
1992 LLRW TOTAL 4,4.17 FT3
.
u
,
uM 55 GALLON DRUM = 7.5 Ff, l
}l
'
i
.
U
'.
si l
ll WHICH REPLACES ONE200 Ff LINER.
B.,
~24,000 Ff OVER DISTRICT LIQUID SOLIDIFICA TION $
i VOLUMEREDUCTION IS
!
$
%=.aa==.xum mxma<exue:orma.wawwwmm<v<+=*w+=mmsexuww. paw;--
e me+wawa-u.m m -w,<.myou
..y.,m
-
-
x
!
!
Page 11
!
,
!
-
-
- -
-
-
.__
-..
..
-
- -..
-
-
-
-
..
.
.
.
__ _
__...
.
...
~ _.. _ _.. - _. _. _.
_.._.___...m.
.
Rancho Seco - 7/27/93 nsnammamwomstsausstassammam aremmeaumwam. mna====wam1rammeswawamunum anamn:wswi;sm; u
1993 LLRW TOTALS / PROJECTIONS
]
y!!
I.
c
-
VOLUME REDUCTION O FT SHIPPED
~
h@j
~
127 FT TO SHIP i
,
b Q
DIRECT DISPOSAL NONE y!!
I n
0 BLENDER / DRYER DRUMS 96 DRUMS MADE/ STORED I
E1 135 DRUMS TO MAKE i
i a
g e
nl 1993 PROJECTED TOTAL 231 DRUMS l
u N
l
PROJECTED 1993 LLRW
~ 2,544 FT l
N v
bl O
PROJECTED 1994 LLRW.
~ 300 FT
.
i
'
n mne werwwwmmw = ~ nw~
-
fw wwmww-mnwwwmn~wwwme memmmmm-mwomemn.=, --,
Page 12
_
-
.
.
.
-.._...
.
4 Rancho Seca - 7/27/93 tomm agamarwns aumen wee #~;c me mnwin,cosmeuA:#uuams sm
.w+
z su n
,
x e
i
li LLRW STORAGE
-.
Isu
$
NOT CURRENTLY SHIPPING LLRW n
.
CURRENTL Y ~ 1,026 FT STOREDINIOSB
-
!!"
,
1994 LLRWSTORAGEPROJECTION -
~2844 FT (MAXIMUM)
ii
-
Il b
IOSB CAPA CITY IS GREA TER THAN 50,000 FT
-
U n
$
SHIPPING TO BARNWELL NOT FEASIBLE
R b
TRITIUM LEAK /SUPERFUND LIA BILITY CONCERN
'
-
+
!!
MAJOR CHANGE TO RADWASTEPROGRAM/ PROCEDURES
$
-
Il
.
h{
SO. WEST COMPACT COSTPER Ff BASED ON VOLUME
'
>
~
Y N
ACCESS TO BARNWELL MA Y BEBLOCKED DUE TO
-
LACK OFSO. WEST COMPACTPROGRESS a
- p.~,-~~ ~ w w,m m.-e u-- - ~ w ~~m --.,w _
. =r-we- - _,..
we -- umm4 - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~.
-
,
Page 13
,
t
..
.
.
.
.
.
_ _. _ _ _ _. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _ _,.. _ _ _..
1.
.s
_
m,,
,,
n--
..,nn.
-an
-
.}
i n
-
e k
$
I
-
.
4
n
i Q
i
\\
m N
m
.
e i
W h
^
i I
O e
!
Oe@
s
>
c
,
.'
C3
i Q
m
<
,
.
!.?
I.
,
<
o v
I ek N
k
-
.
,
,
M
i f
$
j n
t J'
$a i
,
!
1
,
.
,y
I If f.
,
,
w
,
!
i
!
I
i I
a
m
-
,
t I
w
z:
y
.
.
.$
5 i
W p
I$
?
e s
L3
eb
$
'y
'
$
y f,
R i
!
(#
~
E I
.
$$
g i
'
a4 e
'
f.2
}
i
,
Ec?'
C?$",T?NTs."?N?2
T-$k
,
i i
,
,
,
..,.,,-
--,,....,,---,-,,-.---,..-,-r---,....,,,--...,----,-
c.,,-_w
,,, -.. -... -
_ - -,, ~. -..,..,, - -..,. - - - - - -. - - - - -
- - --
-.
..
_
.._
..
. _ _ = - _. - -.. - _... -. -
... -. ~ _ -.. _.. _ _ -
_
-
L
..
,
.
F7ancho Seco - 7/27/93
-
r, >.
rpsawameanwnm wscamn + Anuaw wwnuwwxcemanwnwsizzam :iw n
.
F
j!
AWA! TING NRC APPROVAL il k
y ACTION INITI AL SUBMITT AL n
if PRICE ANDERSON EXEMPTION 11/14/90
'
sa tj t;
l}
DECOMMISSIONING FINANCIAL PLAN &
07/24/90 g;
FUNDING PERIOD
,.
isu
DECOMMISSIONING PLAN 05/20/91
,
u
!
it l
6i i
y PA - 186, NUCLEAR ORGANIZA TION O1/19/93
ilij 1O/04/91
'
y ISFSILICENSE
.
n
.
H
'
$
E-PLAN CHANGE /RP RESPONDER 07/12/93 u
,
e
'
L
{l TRAINING RULE EXEMPTION 07/19/93
}
i (n-mm.- ---,c
-
,
w -,m
_
..w,- -,,.r -,e ~ - ren,mor- - = - : m - rem ~
I B
l Page 15
!
!
!
.
.
-
-
-
-
-
.
. -
-. - -
. ~.
..
. -.
- -
-
-