IR 05000277/1989010

Exam Repts 50-277/89-10OL & 50-278/89-10OL on 890321.Exam Results:One Reactor Operator Applicant Passed Operating Test

ML20245C531
Person / Time
Site:	Peach Bottom
Issue date:	04/11/1989
From:	Florek D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20245C525	List: IR 05000277/1989010 ML20245C523
References
50-277-89-10OL, 50-278-89-10OL, NUDOCS 8904270196
Download: ML20245C531 (3)

Text

-:..

(_

~

.

'

-

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT EXAMINATION REPORT N (0L)

FACILITY DOCKET NO and 50-278 FACILITY LICENSE NO DPR-44 and DPR-56 LICENSEE: Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 FACILITY: Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station EXAMINATION DATE: March 21, 1989 CHIEF EXAMINER: b D.~FlorekT Senior Operations Engineer

'

i @ ate'

APPROVED BY: <du M Rf~ chard Conte, CMef, BWR Section 9 //

Date

'j Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY: One operating test was administered to one reactor operator applicant. The applicant passed the operating tes ;

[ h I ,

V

_ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ >

-

.

-

.

-

DETAILS )

l i

'

l l

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW The NRC examiner conducted this replacement examination for one Reactor Operator (RO). This was a retake examination in which the individual previously past the written portion of the examinatio The examination was administered in accordance with NUREG 1021, Rev. 5, dated January 1, 1989, Examiner Standards (ES). The results are summarized belo $ R0 5 SR0 E E Pass / Fail B Pass / Fail E E E E E E E E EWritten E N/A E N / A E E E I E E E E E E0perating I 1/0 E N / A E E E E E E I E E E0verall E 1/0 5 N / A E E E E E 2.0 EXAMINATION RELATED FINDINGS / CONCLUSIONS No general strengths and deficiencies were noted on the operating tes .0 ADDITIONAL FINDINGS The examiner noted during the operating test that the applicant needed a considerable time to find the appropriate system operating (S0) procedures in the control room due to the lack of appropriate identification or conflicting identification on the outside on the 50 procedure binder This did not reflect the applicants ability, only on the quality of the binders housing the new S0 procedure Licensee representatives indicated that the condition of the 50 procedure binders was temporary and was caused by the introduction of the new S0 procedures into the control room. The introduction of the new S0 procedures is continuing for restart. The licensee plans to have binders for the S0 procedures appropriately marked and arranged in the control room for restar L________-____________--___-_________-__-_____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .)

'

,

,

'

I t

.

'

-

-3-

!

l 4.0 EXIT MEETING l

l l 4.1 Attendees

~

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission D. Florek, Senior Operations Engineer T. Johnson, Senior Resident Inspector Philadelphia Electric Company R. Andrews, Operations Training Supervisor J. Cotton, Operations Superintendent J. Franz, Plant Manager 4.2 SUMMARY COMMENTS The Operations staff was cooperative in maintaining a control room environment which was conducive to the administration of the operating tes The results of the examinations were not discussed at the exit meetin Every effort would be made to provide the applicant's results in approximately one wee '

The Additional Findings, (Section 3) and the licensee's actions were discussed during the exit meeting.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _