IR 05000246/1973001

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-246/73-01 on 730220-22.No Noncompliance Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Reactor Vessel QA Program & QC Sys for Piping
ML19319B554
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse, 05000246 Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 02/22/1973
From: Erb C, Hayes D, Cale Young
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML19319B551 List:
References
50-346-73-01, 50-346-73-1, NUDOCS 8001270086
Download: ML19319B554 (10)


Text

.-.

._

-

-

-.

. -

. -..

--

. _ _ - - _ _ - _ _

.

O i

i

.

I l

e

\\.

'

I t

'

h,s g.7.,., e c). r- * p../.I

+

y, t v... l.

p s.

,,

c.

. - r ; 7.A.,,

.v.

.

.l..

.<

J...

,L Ue

+s e

g+n e-r>

..1,y t L.e v',3

. [ 3 3 'i..'.r q * + C'

I) 51. ** [ mfs' t v

v, t -t

,

m s.

.

..

,

i l

e

' I '1 p..r,1 U"..'

-

L

a.

l

!

C. D.'.." ~x.."u T I O' '. r. ". q,c".C.'.. t.

,'

~

p -..n o..7..

0.5 '

o

.

.

l

'

r i

!'O Ensp.e: tion Report ::o. 030-346/73-01 l'

i..

..

, 1. e : n c.' e toledo L uson r.,or 7aa)

Edi;on Placa l

300 'kdison Avenue Toledo, C'a lo 43h32 Dreis-B<mae ':uclear Po ear Station I.icense !!o. CPPR-00 0 2h I! arbor, Citio Ca tar,ory *

A Eype of Licensee:

P '. 1 (!W!) - S72 :'we

i l

T,pe of Inspection:

Routine l

,

('

Dat:; of Inspection:

Februarf 20 - 22, 1973

'

i i

D.ites of Previous Inspection: Nover.ber 29 - 30 and j

f Decenber 12 - 13, 1012 l

.

.; 7.*

,

'T.-

-,&.

,s

~..

sz.

"

Youn gl, Leitd Project Inspector

'

/

~,..'. ' '>

,

'

Principal Inspector:

C.

>

(Date)

- ~...,,, '

.'

I

-,,

/.,

,./ *

s..

-..s ?,-

.,, L,

<

.c

.-

,

,

J.ccoinpanying, Inspector :

C. :I. Eri>,' Engineerin;- Inspactor

',' -?Z75 (Date)

0;har 1.ccompanying Peraennal: ::cne

.l

.~

,f'

{, e

'd,.4 -

-.a

-,.S enio:~,/ Project Inspector (Acting)

-,.,.,.,.,

n n';e.ced Jy :

D. U.

dayas,

/. - e..(

-

Reactor Conatruction Branch (Date)

,

i i

N

,

U001270 Og

,

,

'

_

.

-

..

.

__ ____..

.-

_____ _.-

_ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ - _ -

_ -.. _ _ _ - -. _ _ _ _ _ _.

__

_

_

l

t

-

l l

ginSunY_OF FIMDIM M

\\

i i

Enforcauant.iction A.

Violations No violations vere identified.

i B.

Safety Matters t

Uo cafety natters trare identified.

i

!

I.icensae Action on Previously Identified Enforcem.nt.iction Failure to Issue a Nonconformnca Report.

_

It'enti_fy_. or Seerc pi3 Manconforcina Pinina at the_ luvis -Sesse Site (RO INuection ;teoort No. 050-346//2-06)

,

During the previous inapection Class I piping spool pieces t

!

to be tack velded by unqualified unidera, vere not identified

, known segregated i:o prevent nar i

inadvertant use.

Furthernare, prompt notifi-cc. tion was not given concerning this natter nor uns a report uritten puruuant

,

to the requirenants of 10 CFR Part 50.55(c).

'

" hold" tags.tha nonconforming piping spools ucre identificd and narhed zichSu

.-

,

!

}

During the current inspection it was deternined that

.i the non-

,:

conforma'nce had been properly resolved and the " hold" tags renoved

-

and that a final report tteeting the requiremants of 10 CFrt Part

'

'

,

had bean issued.

Following the inspection, 50.55(e)

letter of March 2, 1973, was received in responsethe Toledo Edisen Company

letter of January 10, 1973, to the !to:III matter is closed.

and una considered adentnte.

This t

l Desien Changes

-

-

!

!

No neu design changes ucre identified.

a

i Unusual Occurrences No unusual occurrences were identified.

Of*%

bo1 l

1LUL

,

I i-2-

,

!

i

- -.

.

- - - -. - -

. - -

, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _. _

__

_

i

'

_

I i

!

I Other Sisnif icar. Findinca

i

{

A.

Current FinCings l

i

'

'

l 1.

Status of Construction s

i i

The enginaering effort ras estimated to be 88% complete and construction 40% complete at the end of December 19 72.

l 2.

Personnel t

$

i!

t Mr. J. W. Marshall has been appointed Field Quality Control t

i Supervisor for Babcock and Ullcon Company (00U).

,

i I

!

S.

!

Unresolved Matters

!

{!

4'

!

"o new, unresolved natters ware identified.

!

I'.

,

i C.

t Status of Previcusly Reported Unresolved Matters i 1 I

i

.

i

!

1.

_ Reactor Coolant Piping (RO Inspection Report No. 050-346/72-06)

j A canufacturer's data report for the reactor coolant piping has not been received from the USS supplier.

Steps have been taken to expedite delivery of quality documentation for this piping and for "SS supplied components at

the site which lack

quality docanantation.

This natter remains open.

,

}

2.

Tagr,ing and Dasiccant Indicators on Cocoonents from the tlSS

'

{

Contractor O '.') (R0 Inspection Report No. 050-346/72-06)

!

l

.

i Inspection of tags on piping and components stored outdoors, s

!

established that new tags, covered with plastic as protection i

j against the weather, had replaced the old tags, also, desiccant

i

'

indicators had been replaced and the new indicators clearly showed the range of humidity being neasured.

These matters are considered closed.

,

3.

Gas Decay Tanks: Helding Procedures and Oualification t

Records Not Available at the Site i

!

050-346/72-05)

("O Inspection Report No.

l

.

i l

.

Review of documentation estchlished that velding procedures used in fabricating the gas decay tanks had been properly i

l qualified.

Copies of the procedures were available for l

ravieu.

This matter is closed.

-3-D

) ED<

O

>

l l

l l

-

l l

control inspection signoff and by coupletion of an ir.spection report by Bechtel quality control inspectors.

b.

neview of OC Systen Records v.ero reviewed for the receipt inspection, handlint;,

and storage of the renctor vecsel.

These records consisted of procedures developed by DEW and approved by Bechtel.

These records indicated that inspection and handling were acconplished as planned.

I f

c.

Follow-Un Record Review Periodic inspections of the reactor vessel are made by EEW j

quality control inspectors.

Records of these inspections indicate the reactor vessel to be in satisfactory condition.

d.

Follow-Up Observations of Cork Inspection of the reactor vessel stored in a lifting rig at

,

I the site established that the vessel is properly protected and under surveillance.

I

'

\\

\\

I ltill>

'

<

d l

l t

l

'

D 9%

-6-VWI e

1yaIL

- - - -

_ - - -. _. -

_ - -.---.-. -

. _ - - _. _ _ _ - -

. -. - - - - - - -_

.

i

!

'

'l

'

'}ll APPE:! DIX A i

<

-

, ;

I )lJ -/

p - (f.,

-

'

.,,

Prepared By.

C :I. Erb

~

.5

! ? -

i

!

,

-

,

,

l Engineering Inspector (Date)

,

f r

[ [h..,,,

Reviewed For

',

,,,

Information:

C. *iound

> ' - ' ',

Lead Project Inspector (Date)-

,

r O

,

'

Reviewed By: [7 d_.I9<,m - ~ -

'22-H

,

' Senior Proj ect (Date)

Inspector i

i

Persons Contacted The following persons, in addition to individuals listed under the Managemant Intervieu Section of this report, were contacted during the inspaction.

s

Crinnell Connany (Crinnell)

,

E. A. Wilson, Supervisor - Welder Qualifications l

D. R. Giguere,I!anager - Quality Assurance

H. E. Kindt, Piping Superintendent - Containment and i

Auxiliary Building l

R. D. De Carlo, Radiographer

!

_Results of Inspection

'

i 1.

Other Class I Pipina (Containment Suray and Conconent Cooling : Tater)

I a.

QA Systect - Welding and Piping A satisfactory quality assurance plart, which conforms to the

!

application, is being implemented by the Toledo Edison Campany

!

(TECO) for the containment spray and conponent cooling water systen.

The Class I piping is being installed by Grinnell.

Grinnell has a contract with TECO, which includes fabrication of piping spools in the Grinnell plant in I:ernersville,

,

!

North Carolina, and installation of the spools at the i

Davis-Besse site.

Although Grinnell does not presently have a "NA" stamp for site fabrication, an evaluation by the AS::E connittee, for issuance of the stang, will be made when 20%

of the piping installation is conplete.

Dechtel, acting as architect-engineer, construction manager, and quality as.surance agent for TECO, issues purchase ordern, which include the goveriting specifications, to the contractors.

Dachtel naintains

@O'

bd T" N u

- S klirLa

.

.

-

--

________ _ - _ _- _ _ _ - _.__---. _ _ _ _ - _ _ _

_

_ _ _ _ _

l ll

,

,

-

,

resident quality assurance inspectors in the Grinnell plant and also furnishes receiving inspection service at the cite.

TECO quality assurance performs audits of Grinnell at the

j fabrication plant in Kernersville ar.d of Grinnell and Dechtel j

QC activities at the site.

Grinnell maintains separate, special

{

areas for both indoor and outdoor receiving and storage.

i j

b.

Quality Control Systen - Welding

'

!

-

l The same velding procedures are used by Grinnell for spool

fabrication and for site system construction.

The veld procedures and the welders are properly qualified, and

'

documentation of this fact is on file. The nondestructive test procedures and personnel are also qualified, with lists available of the personnel qualified to parform the various NDT tests.

.

Identification of weld location, procedures used, and welders is maintained by use of isometric drawings and a

!

weld data report, Forn No. FF-106A.

This form is a check-I off type, traveler sheet (initiated by the inspector and f

approved by QC) which renains with the veld and covers all phases, including visual examination of joint preparation, i

root gap, purge, aligneent, root pass, and conpleted weld.

!

The NDT required and results at various stages of the weld

O are also shown, together with identification of the NDT

!

inspector and checking QC representatives.

Preheat and post heat treatment requirenents are also shcwn and checked off on Form No. FF-10GA.

Autographic records of the required stress relief tenperature are included in the j

documentation package for each completed weld.

!

,

!

i l

Radiograph, magnetic particle, and penetrant testing require-l ments are shown on the veld data sheet, together uith a check-l

!

off form for the results.

!

i

!

i i

Uhen weld defects nust be removed, they are either ground out

!

or arc air gauged and rewelded to the original procedure.

l l

The original radiographic films, showing the defect, are i

included in the film package with proper identification of l

records to the weld.

Verification and acceptance of the

!

repair is contained on Form No. FF-106A.

I

!

'

l The certifications for velding rods, electrodes, and inserts j

were on file, and documentation existed chich verified that the various tests (analysis, ferrite, pl;ysicals) were

!

,

l

!

'

19 g-2-

9 W

w u> d l

g rp n M T g "

5.M J] s b i

a

-

,

!

,

~w,-

,-,--w-www.w-.

w--,

m w-w w, m.m v _ _

_--.r-----mm,

.,__,.._,_w--mm--

-a,_,-,. __

-

--

_ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ - -. - _ -. _ - -

- -

. _. _ - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

_

.

'

,

.-

'

i satisfactory.

Preissue storage condition.1

heated, locked room, while the carbon steel m

,

a v

issued to the welders in heated oven containers e

is controllod by a storeroor requisition

.

All issuu that the proper naterials were issued for the welds bein, uith verificatio

.

{

nade.

Partially burned electrode stubs are returned for g

scrapping to the storeroom.

.

returned and stored la a large, central oven, uhile unusedUn i

stainless steel is returned and stored in a separate roon

.

.

c.

P.ecord Review - Welding A record review was made of a carbon steel weld joining spool No. 36 HEC-2.4 to No. 36 HEC-2-5 in tha component cooli piping water system.

This ucid, FW No. 3, required magnetic particle ng Inspection only.

Tha weld data report, identifying the

!

completed and signed off. procedure, ualder, and inspection po i

the inspector's checkoff at various hold points had bMaterial y

recorded.

The records for a veld on pipe spool No.

een properly in the containment spray system were also c::amined and fo 34HCE-9 to be satisfactory.

und Furthermore it was found that, were included in the documentation package.were n where repairs

r,

{

of qualified welders onsite for Grinnell was reviewed and The current list

!

appeared to be acceptable, d.

Observation of Uork Performance - Welding Several in-process welds were examined onsite and fo

meet quality requirements.

!

und to in the immediate area and properly filled out.The weld data sheet w i

welder, and inspector were identified and the weld locati The veld, shown on an isometric drauing.

{

on was The identification, handling, and control of welding materials was considered satisfactor y.

Review of QC Systen - Piping e.

The QC systca for piping uses procedures initiated b However, the licensee, y Grinnell.

through Bechtel audits the system to quality procedures. ascertain that it conforms to the overall Bechtel-licens personnel and review of records indicated thatDiscussion with G l

items uere adequately implemented by the quality contr lthe following

l o systen.

(1)

Chenical and physical certifications and NDT of materi l a s.

\\

-3-q r ~}f lb lii f st

,,

,

cza

,7

-

_ S A-

-Q

.

. -

. _

- - _ _ _ _ _. _ _ -. _.. - _. _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ -

- -.

-

i i

l t

.

.

!

i t

'

i (2) Marking and identification, cleaaliness, protective i

closures, quarantine of noncot. forming rater al, storage

'

identification, control, and protection.

i I

.

i f.

Follou-Up Record % view - Pipin~

I Records were revieued for two installation welds; one in the

I component cooling systen desi;;nated !!o. 36, and tha other in the containment spray systen, desigr.ated No. 34.

The racords

'

indicated that the spools met caterial specifications, uere j

given a receipt inspection oncite, and w2re properly installed.

j I

,

g.

_ Follow-Up Observations of I!ork - Pipinq j

11 elds in process in the component cooling system and con-tainment spray were examined.

,

}

QC inspections were being made at the specified hold points, with confirming inspectors' signatures.

The observations l

.

of the hardware and procedures used appear to indicate satis-

'

factory controls.

I'

j The installation of hangers and snubbers was not checked, j

i since the installation was just beginning.

[!

!

i I

!'

r

'

i

!

! i i

j

.

I

l t

O

!-

i

!

!

l.

l t

!

I i

D 'PD l

bbJ

'

i e

l i

l l

..

--.....

..

.

-....

.

..

..

--.