IR 05000156/1998201
| ML20203H762 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | University of Wisconsin |
| Issue date: | 02/18/1998 |
| From: | NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20203H747 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-156-98-201, NUDOCS 9803030321 | |
| Download: ML20203H762 (7) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ _
.
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Docket No: 50-156 License No: R 74 Report No: 50150/98201 (DRPM)
.
Licensee: University of Wisconsin Facility Name: TRIGA Rosearen Reactor Location: Madison, Wisconsin Dates: February 3-4,1998 inspector: T. M. Burdick, Reactor inspector Approved by: Marvin M. Mendonca, Acting Director Non-Power Reactor and Decommissioning Project Directorate
,
9803030321 980218 PDR ADOCK 05000156 G PDR
. . . .
, .
.
_ .
.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - - - - _ - _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ - - _ - - -
,
.
.
Executive Summary TRIGA Research Reactor Report No. 50-156/98201(DRPM)
This routine, announced inspection included aspects of plans, procedures, and reviews (81401); protection of safeguards information (81810); material control and accounting of special nu:: lear matcrial (SNM) (85102); fixed site physical protection of SNM of Moderate strategic significance (81421);.
Plans, Procedures, and Reviews (81401) Protection of Safeguards information (81810);
Material Control and Accounting (85102); and Physical Protection (81421)
e The licensee's program had been acceptably implemented as require _ m-wsm-n.immim==ma- i :
___ _ . _ _
.
.
-
-.
REPORT DETAILS Plant Summary The TRIGA Research Reactor at the University of Wisconsin had continued to support teaching in the undergraduate program and various neutron activation and irradiation service .0 Plans, Procedures, and Reviews a. Inspection Scope (81401)
The inspector reviewed the licensee's physical security plan to assure that .
changes, if any, had not reduced the overall effectiveness of the plan and that the implementation procedures were sufficient to meet regulations.
l- b. Findings and Observations The license's security plan was approved in 1991. The level of effectiveness had been maintained as described in the plan. Licensee procedures to implement the j security plan were in effect. Both had been reviewed as require c. Conclusion The licensee had implemented their approved security plan and procedures ed penocical < reviewed them as require .0 - Protection of Safeguards Information a. Inspection Scope (81810)
To verify that safeguards information was protected as required against unauthoriied disclosur b. Observations and Findings The licensee kept ail safeguards informat!:n properly secured and restricted access to only authorized person c. Conclusions Acceptable measures were taken by the licensee to protect information regarding the security plan.
) m
_ _ _ - _ .__-____ - _-__ - -- - -
--
.
.
<
)
3.0 Material Control and Accounting a. Inspection Scope (85102)
] Determine whether the licensee had limited possession and use of Special Nuclear Material (SNM) to the locations and purposes authorized under the license and whether an ader,uate and effective program existed to account for and control the SNM in the licensee's possession, b. Observations and Findings Selected records of inventory and receipt were reviewed and verified to be accurate. No SNM has been received or transferred since the last inspection. The inspector made a detailed accounting of all SNM in the licensee's possession and found it to be consistent with licensee record c. Conclusion
) Licensee records and r . O for SNM possession and receipt were complete and accurat .0 Fixed Physical Protection of SNM of Moderate Strategic Significance a. Inspection Scope (81421)
To assure that the licensee's physical protection system wou!d have minimized the potential for unauthorized removal of SNM and would have facilitated the location and recovery of missing SN b. Observations and Findings By direct observation of intrusiv alarm system testing and alarm monitoring, and discussion of response actions with police and security personnel, the inspector verified that acceptable measures and procedures were in place to meet requirement c. Conclusions The licensee had an operable intrusion monitoring system and used acceptable testing to confirm the system operability. Reactor personnel and police and security personncl were aware of their responsibilitie . . . .
.
.
.
5.0 Exit Meeting Summary The inspector presented the inspection results to members of the licensee '
management at an exit meeting on February 4,1998. The !icensee acknowledged the findings presented. The inspector asked the licensee whether any material examined during the inspection should be considered proprietary. The licensee identified the details of the physical security plan as proprietary information.
l
,
-
-
-
- - - ~ - - - - - - - - ~ - ~
,
.
.
Persons Contacted University of Wisconsin
'R. Cashwell Director, TRIGA Research Reactor S. Matusowie Reactor Supervisor
-
T. Foley Dispatcher, Police and Security The inspector also contacted othe technical and administrative staff personnel during the inspectio * Denotes those attending the exit meeting on February 4,1998, inspection Procedures Used IP 81421 Fixed Site Physical Protection of SNM of Moderate Strategic Significance IP 81401 Plans, Procedures, and Reviews IP 81810 Protection of Safeguards information IP 85102 Material Control and Accounting items Opened and Closed None List of Documents Reviewed Administrative Procedures Physical Security Plan Reactor Operating License Technical Specifications List of Acronyms Used CFR Code of Federal Regulations DRPM Division of Reactor Project Management NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission PDR Public Document Room SNM Special Nuclear Material TS Technical Specifications
_ _ _ . . .. ____
,I ll L_
F O e o )
n n a L_ a c M E
G O
.
_ sr e
A N t c
P E
A _ a r
a e h T
h _ C 8 4 9 6
6 m
.
_ (
e
/
2 it
" _ _
l
- I E _
E E
T
'
n
_ _
A a
_
D _
_
E ) g :
T y n ls A
l n - n - ei a D O p e _ _
et i yn R o _ lpS oI E
)
l s L ( i S)
f
.C
_ _ mT I E e OI _
_ ER E N E _
_
t t a u g
n D
t Am E or _ o e&
i n _ _
s d e ef _ _ l oe u v hd _ ' m l
E
. t e _ a c O nn n N i ia _ N
-
)
S Mi A l
l t
_
_
_
t s
_ F R , i b F a
_
_
I ( F te Od E ( o _ _
L M :
e
_
E Y a lf
_
_
l
T Rla d e
_
_
_
_
_
S T c Y Ns S E e K
C l
C o
g
.
m l
_
_
_
_
_ _
d C
o l
- pan D R _ O r
_ g
.
U A T o Q S _ O r
B S le l
W O
D (n I E b _ t u
is
.
LR -
LOYL W n _ c e
T S o s l OT FC p n
_
_ o RA N Y
s e u u
_ _
l C
OEO TR B Y B
R m
u _
D _
l l l
CRS E D s EEM T T
E Bus u l
_
_ :
e _
PWE S I M
W E u _ d o
NOT I PI B I
V
s mu
_
_ C _
la _
_
U E ri 1m e S R ot u _ s W
E t in cI u
_
u a
l e m _ _
C N 6 pS sT Tsuu _ -
_
_ _
N inI R _
-
.
E le
_
-
a P . 5 b 1 e
r
-
O is
A O N n _ l o a T 1 p l
- n E
K - - -
s e _ -
it o
N C R l l - c O n
_
I I S d u D a: :
N ee 3
-
F io n O C
0 L ma C K sl it n _
P L
s S N I D U A is I W 5 t R - S 7 m
F s
a U B :
_ 9 1/
-
m I 2 r o O T I S
_
e C Y N 1 2 3 i t
n b C y T U
e l M m S r ! t U E _ u l E o S a T N N t R D I O
la E N _
e N u V 1 la 1
E r
u N g I t P I e N
.
it _ d E R O l l it n O _ e P U N 0 m s
.
- c O r
a :
n o
.
U O o r ;
E T a S e R 2 N N_ _ P I F
lc M O T r
. I _ n I
A
u q S o i
P e _ O N N E t
r S MU : it F
.
E R 8 o p E T e _
c e
NI T I e m TA I
l t p l
C S
U S R e T i _
.
s !
9 i t
S T _
_
I n M t
l ' f l I l S 3 l