IR 05000123/1985003
| ML19344C033 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | University of Missouri-Rolla |
| Issue date: | 06/12/1985 |
| From: | Creed J, Drouin B, Pirtle G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19344C031 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-123-85-03, 50-123-85-3, NUDOCS 8506140643 | |
| Preceding documents: |
|
| Download: ML19344C033 (2) | |
Text
-
_
. _.
_ _ _ _ _ _.
__
___
_
._.
I
,
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
Report No. 50-123/85003
+
.
l Deskst No. 50-123 License No. R-79 Safeguards Group II
!
,
Licensee:
University of Missouri - Rolla
!
School of Mines and Meta?lurgy Rolla, MO 65401
,
Facility Name:
Rolla Nuclear Reactor
Inspection At:
Nuclear Reactor Building, Rolla, MO
,
Date of Inspection:
May 28-30, 1985 l
Date of Previous Physical Security Inspection:
August'30-31, 1983 Type of Inspection:
Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspectors: 9' S. bM b b
G. L. Pirtle Date
'
Physical Security Inspector g R.L% b dMW B. Drouin Date
'
Physical Security Inspector Approved By: S4 M k^
414W i
J. R. Creed, Chtef Date Safeguards Section l
l Inspection Summary Inspection on May 28-30, 1985 (Report No. 50-123/85003(DR$$))
Areas Inspected:
Included a Review of Security Plan / Implementing Procedures; Security Organization; Records and Reports; Testing and Maintenance; Locks, Keys, and Ccmbinations; Physical Barriers; Lighting; Entry / Exit - Personnel; Entry / Exit Control - Packages /SNM; Detection Aids - CAA and Communications.
The inspection involved 22.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> direct-inspection effort by two NRC inspectors.- The inspection-began during the day shift.
Results:
The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requi}ements within the areas examined during the inspection, except for the following item:
Detection Aids - CAA:
There were two incidents where the Reactor Building was
,
,
!
unoccupied and the required level of security was not maintained.
,f
,p
.
-.
.
.
..
.
-
.
-
.
..
.
.
l
!
Two areas of concern were developed during the course of the 'nspection.
The i
first concern dealt with a lack of implementing procedures to insure that badge accountability, end of normal day security checks, and key control measures i
were being performed.
The second concern centered on the need for a critical
!
review of the Physical Security Plan to eliminate the numerous inaccuracies, ine.nsistencies and erroneous information.
-
-
,
(Details - 10 CFA 2.790(d) INFORMATION)
~~
)
'
s j
<
)
,
t
.
,
C
,
.
,
)
ATTI.::::::!T CC::LU:
10 CFit 2.7CJ(d) I;./0 l
l
.-