IR 015000004/1989001
| ML20247H597 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 015000004 |
| Issue date: | 05/24/1989 |
| From: | Lamastra M, Thomas R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20247H589 | List: |
| References | |
| 15000004-89-01, 15000004-89-1, NUDOCS 8905310271 | |
| Download: ML20247H597 (3) | |
Text
- _ _ _ _ - _ _.
._.
s
t
'
i..
.
.
.,
U.'S.
NUCLEAR REGUL% TORY COMMISSION
REGION V
Report No. 89,01 Docket No. 15000004 License No. 1836-80 (State of California)
Priority 1 Licensee: Decisive Testing, Inc.
4582 Federal Boulevard San Diego, California 92102
. Inspection at:
Hawaiian Airlines Maintenance Shop Inspection Conducted:
May 12, 1989 Inspector:
[8
R. D. Thomas, Chief Nuclear Date Signed Materials Safety Section Approved by:
- #S " --
-
d M
M. Lam 6stra, Acting Chief Date Signed Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Branch Summary:
NRC Inspection conducted on May 12,1989 (Reppr t No. 15000004/89-01)
This was an onsite inspection of a agreement state licensee working in Hawaii under the general licensed provisions of 10 CFR 150.20.
The Form NRC-241 was dated May 1, 1989.
Results:
No items of noncompliance were identified within the areas inspected.
8905310271 890524
~
PDR STPRQ ESCCA PNU
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _
. -.
-
- _ _--__- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
,
l
,
...
.
<
.
,
l DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Mr. Mark May, Radiographer-Ms. Gina Gonzales, Radiographer Helper
'2.
Background This radiographic operation was being conducted on a jet engine located in the Hawaiian Airlines maintenance shop of the Henolulu International Airport.
The work had been authorized on a Form NRC-241, dated May 1, 1989, in accordance with the general license provision of 10 CFR 150.20.
The Form NRC-241 was acknowledged on May 10, 1989 Ly R. D. Thomas of.the Region V office.
3.
Transportation Requirements
,
,
The Inspector examined the shipping papers and the source overpack in accordance with DOT /NRC requirements.
The shipping papers were complete i
and acceptable. _The source overpack was properly identified and was labeled with a yellow two D0T label.
No violations were identified.,
4.
Posting of Area
,
At the time of the inspection, the source was not exposed; therefore, signs and barrier ~were not in place.
A discussion with the radiographer indicated that the required signs and~ barriers were present, and had been used during the earlier exposure -of the source.
The utilization log
'
indicated the survey data and the posting of signs.
..
No violations were identified.
5.
Personnel Dosimetry The Inspector observed that the radiographer and the helper had been assigned personnel dosimetry.
Both individuals were wearing a film badge or TLD and pocket dosimeters.
,
No violations were identified.
6.
Survey Instrument The Inspector observed that tbe radiographer had a radiation survey for use.
The instrument was in current calibration and operable.
No violations were identified.
I
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _. _. _. _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _.. _ _
_ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _.
_._._.________m___._.
_ _.
__ _ _ _______ _ _.__._ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
_ - _ _, - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
-.
. _
_
.-_
_ _ _ -
-_
_ - _-__- - -___
_
' '.
..,.
...
,
7.
Surveys An examination of the utilization log indicated that the proper surveys had been conducted while the source was exposed.
The area was being
. cleared to the 2.0 mr/hr level.
No violations were identified.
.
' 8.
Operating Procedures
'
.
.
],
-The Inspector examined the operating procedures which were in the
. possession of~the radiographer.
The procedures appeared to be adequate.
)
When ' questioned by t.he inspector, the radiographer gave acceptable
'
answers which indicated that he had been trained in the procedures.
i
\\
No violations were' identified.
,
..c.: <
,
,
s
'
,
.,
.
'U, 49.
Utilization Log
'
-
<
< ' - u
'
,
iy
'
"The Ihspector examined'the utilization log for the proper entries and
"
r,
' completion.
Some basic.-'information was missing or had not been entered
.
at the time the utilization was examined.
The radiographer completed the
< *
-
.
utilization log da a in the Inspector's presence.
'
No violations were identified.
10.
Radiographic Exposure Device
..
J
-
The exposure device in use was a Gulf Nuclear Model 20V.
The device was properly identified and labeled to indicate the presence of an iridium-192 source of approximately 60 curies. The device appeared to be secured since the locking mechanism was engaged and the key had been removed from the lock box.
The guide tube was in place and positioned in the jet engine housing.
The drive cable was attached and positioned on the ground with approximately 25 to 30 feet between the exposure device and the cranking handle.
No violations were identified.
11.
Conclusion The Inspector reviewcd the findings with the radiographer.
He was told that no violations were identified and the operation was quite acceptable.
.
_ - - -
_