DCL-06-007, License Amendment Request 06-03 Application for License Amendments to Delete Antitrust License Conditions

License Amendment Request 06-03 Application for License Amendments to Delete Antitrust License Conditions

ML060300299
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	01/19/2006
From:	Keenan J Pacific Gas & Electric Co
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
DCL-06-007, OL-DPR-80, OL-DPR-82
Download: ML060300299 (47)

Text

p I

Pacific Gas and Electric Company John S. Keenan 77 Beale Street, Mailcode B32 Senior Vice President San Francisco, CA 94105 Generation & Chief Nuclear Officer Mailing Address Mail Code B32, Room 3235 January 1, 2006 P.O0.

Box 770000 Jnay19,20 S'an Francisco, CA 94177 415.973.4684 PG&E Letter DCL-06-007 Internal: 223.4684 Fax: 415.973.2313 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Docket No. 50-275, OL-DPR-80 Docket No. 50-323, OL-DPR-82 Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 License Amendment Request 06-03 Application for License Amendments to Delete Antitrust License Conditions.

Dear Commissions and Staff:

In accordance with 10 CFR 50.90, enclosed is an application for amendment to Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-80 and DPR-82 for Units 1 and 2 of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant (DCPP), respectively. The enclosed License Amendment Request (LAR) proposes to delete Appendix C, "Antitrust Conditions," from the facility operating licenses.

The reasoning of a Commission decision in 2003 suggests that the NRC has no legal authority to continue to impose the DCPP antitrust conditions. Although that decision has been vacated as moot, the policy and analysis therein remain relevant.

Furthermore, in light of changes in the regulation of the electric industry since the antitrust conditions were first adopted, the conditions are no longer necessary to serve the original intended purpose.

Enclosure I contains a description of the proposed change, the supporting analyses, and the no significant hazards consideration determination. Enclosure 2 contains the marked-up facility operating license pages.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company (F'G&E) has determined that this LAR does not involve a significant hazards consideration as determined per 10 CFR 50.92.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment needs to be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment. The change proposed !in this LAR is not required to address an immediate safety concern. Approval is requested by January 27, 2007. PG&E requests the license amendment be mrnade effective upon NRC issuance, to be implemented within 90 days from the date of issuance.

A member of the STARS (Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing) Attliance Callaway

• Comanche Peak

• Diablo Canyon

• Palo Verde

• South Texas Project

• Wolf Creek 4001

Document Control Desk PG&E Letter DCL-06-007 January 19, 2006 Page 2 If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Stan Ketelsen at (805) 545-4720. Seiryice upon PG&E of comments, hearing requests, or other correspondence or pleadings should be made to the undersigned, and to Richard F. Locke, Esq., Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 77 Beale Street, B30A, San Francisco, California 94105; and to David A. Repka, Esq.,

Winston & Strawn LLP, 1700 K Streel, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006.

Sincerely, Vice President - Generation and Chief Nuclear Officer jerl/3664 Enclosures cc:

Edgar Bailey, DHS Terry W. Jackson Bruce S. Mallett Diablo Distribution cc/enc: Alan B. Wang A member of the STARS (Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing)

Alliance Callaway

• Comanche Peak

• Diablo Canyon

• PaloVerde

• South Texas Project

• Wolf Creek

PG&E Letter DCL-06-007 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of

)

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY)

Diablo Canyon Power Plant

)

Units 1 and2

)

Docket No. 50-275 Facility Operating License No. DPR-80 Docket No. 50-323 Facility Operating License No. DPR-82 AFFIDAVIT John S. Keenan, of lawful age, first being duly sworn upon oath says that he is Senior Vice President - Generation and Chief Nuclear Officer of Pacific Gas and Electric Company; that he has executed License Amendment Request 06-03 on behalf of said company with full power and authority to do so; that he is familiar with the content thereof; and that the facts; stated therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief.

&kS.

KeenK Vice President - Generation and Chief Nuclear Officer Subscribed and -sworn to before me on this 1 9th day of January, 2006, by John S. Keenan, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who appeared before me.

a-MK VJ-L tA. I I

\\

Notary

\\)

State of California County of San Francisco AMY EMIKO NONAKA Commbsson # 1393845 MVC Nohffy Pub k* C14.207 e-WWmm

-ntoo~

PG&E Letter DCL-06-007 EVALUATION

1.0 DESCRIPTION

This letter is a request to amend F:acility Operating Licenses DPR-80 and DPR-82 for Units 1 and 2 of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant (DCPP),

respectively.

This License Amendment Request (LAR) proposes to delete Appendix C, "Antitrust Conditions," from the facility operating licenses.

2.0 PROPOSED CHANGE

The proposed change would delete Section 2.F, "Antitrust," and Appendix C, "Antitrust Conditions," from the facility operating licenses. contains the marked-up facility operating license pages.

3.0 ANALYSIS 3.1 Introduction The Facility Operating Licenses for DCPP, Units 1 and 2, Nos. DPR-80 and DPR-82, presently include certain antitrust license conditions, which are set forth in Appendix C to the licenses. The antitrust license conditions impose what are known as the "Stanislaus Commitments," which, as is discussed further below, derived from the licensing process for the proposed, but never completed, Stanislaus Nuclear Plant. Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) in this application requests amendments to the DCPP facility operating licenses to delete these antitrust license conditions. As reflected in a 2003 Commission decision (which subsequently became moot), it appears to PG&E that there is no legal authority in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (AEA or Act), or in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) regulations, for the NRC to continue to impose these conditions absent PG&E's consent. Moreover, in light of changes in the electric industry,, NRC imposition of the conditions and the prospect of NRC enforcement of the conditions are no longer necessary to serve the original intended purpose.

3.2 Background on the DCPP Antitrust Conditions Both DCPP units were (and remain) licensed to operate under Section 104.b of the AEA. The Section 104 designation (or class of license) resulted from the fact that the DCPP construction permil:s were issued on April 23, 1968 (Unit 1), and December 9, 1970 (Unit 2), that is, prior to the December 1970 amendments to the AEA. Section 104.b licenses issued prior to enactment of the 1970 1

PG&E Letter DCL-06-007 amendments were generally exempt from antitrust review under Section 105 of the AEA and, therefore, generally did not include antitrust license conditions.

The 1970 amendments to the AEA resulted from Public Law 91-560, enacted on December 19, 1970. Congress al: that time specifically amended the licensing provisions of Section 102 of the Act and recast the antitrust review provisions of Section 105.c. The AEA, as amended, requires that licenses for commercial power reactors issued after the date of the amendment be issued under Section 103. See AEA § 102.a; 42 United States Code (U.S.C.) § 2132(a).

Further, the AEA, as amended, requires the NRC to conduct antitrust reviews of applications for construction permits and operating licenses issued under Section 103. See AEA § 105.c(2); 42 U.S.C. § 2135 (c)(2).1 Plants with Section 104.b construction permits as of December 19, 1970, such as DCPP, were "grandfathered" under the 1970 amendments from antitrust review. See AEA § 102.b; 42 U.S.C. § 2132(b).2 That is, the operating license applications for Section 104.b construction permit holders were not subject to antitrust review.

Notwithstanding the'Section 104.b status of the DCPP licenses, the DCPP operating licenses presently include the Stanislaus Commitments as antitrust license conditions in Appendix C. The Stanislaus Commitments were added to the DCPP construction permits by the NRC, with the consent of PG&E, by an amendment dated December 6,1978.3 (A copy of the NRC's amendment is provided as Exhibit 1 hereto.) These license conditions were carried forward into the DCPP operating licenses when those licenses were issued in November 1984 and August 1985. The Stanislaus Commitments derived from the Section 105 pre-licensing antitrust: review of PG&E's proposed (and later canceled) Stanislaus Nuclear Project, not from antitrust review of either the DCPP construction permit or operating license applications.

Prior to the 1970 amrendments, antitrust reviews were triggered only by a Commission finding of 'practical value" for a class of licenses under Section 102 of the Act. Had a practical value finding been made or commercial reactors, the Commission would have begun issuing Section 103 licenses to facilities within the class and then only after a pre-licensing antitrust review. The 1970 amendments deleted the Section 102 language which had provided for the "practical value finding," The amendments substituted the current language which states, in effect, that licenses Issued after the date of enactment (December 19,1970) shall be issued under Section 103.

2 Under Section 105.c(3), Section 104.b licenses could have been subject to a Section 105 antitrust review only f they were "reverse-grandfathered." This could have occurred if any person had interver ed or petitioned to intervene in the construction permit proceeding to address "antitrust cconsiderations." After the 1970 amendments, upon a timely written request to the Commission, such a person could have obtained a Section 105 antitrust review in connection with the operating license! for the "reverse-grandfathered" plant. It does not appear from a review of the records that DCPP fell into this category of Section 104.b licensees that were subjected to an operating license antitrust review.

3 See Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2);

Issuance of Amendment to Construction Permits, 43 Federal Register (Fed. Reg.) 59,934 (Dec. 22, 1978).

2 PG&E Letter DCL-06-007 The Stanislaus Commitments were originally made by PG&E to the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) in connection with DOJ's pre-licensing antitrust review of the Stanislaus project. The commitments were made in a letter from PG&E to DOJ of April 30, 1976. The commitments provided DOJ with the basis to recommend to the Commission that no antitrust hearing would be necessary in connection with a construction permit application for the Stanislaus project.

DOJ's recommendation was stated in an advice letter to the NRC dated May 5, 1976. On May 17, 1976, the NRC issued a notice of receipt of the DOJ advice letter.4 The NRC notice includes the full text of PG&E's commitment letter to DOJ, the commitments themselves, and DOJ's advice letter to the Commission. (A copy of the notice is provided as Exhibit 2 hereto.)

In connection with the Stanislaus Commitments, and as reflected in the letters included in the Commission's 1976 notice, PG&E also agreed that:

"In the event that PG&E's application for a construction permit for the Stanislaus Nuclear Project Unit I is withdrawn, or that a construction permit for such unit is not issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission prior to July 1, 1978, PG&E is willing to have its license(s) for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, amended to incorporate the commitments. '

No construction permit for the Stanislaus project was ever issued.6 However, long before that project was terminated, and consistent with the July 1, 1978, deadline set in the commitment above, on September 15, 1978, the NRC, apparently on its own initiative, sent a letter (a copy is provided as Exhibit 3 hereto) to PG&E advising as follows:

"To date a construction permit for the Stanislaus Nuclear Project Unit 1 has not been issued. Accordingly, in keeping with the above quoted 4

Pacific Gas and Electric Co.; Receipt of Attorney General's Advice and Time for Filing Petitions to Intervene on Antitrust Matters, 41 Fed. Reg. 20,225 (May 17, 1976).

5 41 Fed. Reg. at 2C,226, col. 2.

6 With respect to thf application for the Stanislaus Nuclear Project, several interested parties, including Norhe California Power Agency (NCPA), disagreed with the DOJ recommendation t hat ho NRC antitrust hearing was necessary and, accordingly, requested a hearing. A licensing board was appointed to preside. The licensing board granted the petitions to intervene and requests for hearing of NCPA and others. Pac. Gas & Elec. Co.

(Stanislaus Nucle r Project, Unit 1), LBP-77-26, 5 NRC 1017 (1977). Litigation was actively pursued for severlI years thereafter. The licensing proceeding was eventually terminated in 1983, after PG&E's decision not to pursue the project. See Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. (Stanislaus Nuclear Project, Upit 1), LBP-83-2, 17 NRC 45 (1983) (granting PG&E's motion to withdraw its construction permit application without prejudice). The agreement in 1976 to impose the conditions via the DCPP license pending the licensing of Stanislaus appears to have simply been a vehicle at the time to expedite imposing the commitments by license condition (that is, pending completion of Stanislaus licensing).

3 PG&E Letter DCL-06-007 Company commitment, this is to advise you that it is our present intention to amend Construction Permits CPPR-39 and CPPR-69 issued to the Company on April 23, 19683, and December 9, 1970, respectively, for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2 to incorporate as conditions the Statement of Commitments appended to the Company's letter of April 30, 1976. We expect these amendments to be issued pursuant to the Commission's regulations sometime in October. 'i PG&E replied on September 19, 1978, stating that it "has no objection to the amendment of the Construction Permits as proposed in your letter."8 (A copy of PG&E's letter is provided as Exhibit 4 hereto.) The construction permit amendment discussed above (Exhibit 1) ensued shortly thereafter. (Exhibit 5 hereto is a copy of the notice of the amendment.) Subsequently, when the NRC issued the Section 104.b operating licenses for DCPP Units 1 and 2, the agency simply incorporated the antitrust license conditions as they currently appear.

3.3 Authority to Impose the DCPP Antitrust Conditions The Commission discussed the history and legal status of the DCPP antitrust license conditions in Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2), CLI-03-2, 57 NRC 19, 30-36 (2003), vacated as moot, Northern California Power Agency v. NRC, 393 F.3d 223 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The context in that case was different than the present context; at the time, PG&E was considering a plan of reorganization for the company to emerge from bankruptcy that involved disaggregation of PG&E's various businesses and that required transfers of the NRC operating licenses for DCPP. The specific issue before the Commission was the treatment of the antitrust license conditions in the transferred licenses. The Commission in CLI-03-2 concluded that there would be "no legal underpinning for transferring the Stanislaus-triggered DCPP antitrust condition to new entities to be created under the proposed PG&E reorganization plan" (id. at 34) and declined to "reenact the DCPP antitrust conditions as part of the [proposed] DCPP license transfer" (id. at 35). The issue in that decision subsequently became moot, because PG&E reached a settlement agreement in its bankruptcy case, accepting and ultimately implementing an alternative plan of reorganization that did not involve disaggregation or NRC license transfers and, therefore, the decision was vacated by the Court of Appeals.9 Nonetheless, the legal analysis and policy 7

Letter, Jerome Saltzman, Chief, Antiitrust and Indemnity Group, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, to John C. Morrissey, Vice President and General Counsel, PG&E, dated September 15, 1978.

8 Letter, John C. Morrissey, Vice President and General Counsel, PG&E, to Jerome Saltzman, Chief, Antitrust and Indemnity Group, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, dated September 19, 1978.

9 The NRC approved the DCPP license transfers on May 27, 2003. However, following settlement of the bankruptcy case and implementation of the alternative reorganization plan, 4

PG&E Letter DCL-06-007 considerations in that Commission decision are useful and support the current LAR.

Presently, PG&E remains the licensee for the DCPP units. The licenses remain Section 104.b licenses, as discussed above. As the Commission observed in CLI-03-2:

"The AEA gives the NRC no separate authority, independent of the Stanislaus proceeding, to impose antitrust license conditions on PG&E with respect to DCPP. This is because DCPP was licensed pursuant to section 104 of the AEA -

a section excluding license applicants for "research and development" plants, such as DCPP, from antitrust review (except under circumstances not present here). The Commission's initial authority to impose antitrust conditions on PG&E came from the now-defunct Stanislaus proceeding (a license review based on an application submitted under section 103). Now that it is clear that the section 103 Stanislaus proceeding will not be reopened, we lack an antitrust "hold" on PG&E."

Id. at 34 (footnote omitted).10 This assessment confirms that DCPP was exempt from antitrust review during its licensing and strongly suggests that the Commission now lacks the authority to continue to impose these conditions on PG&E, at least absent PG&E's consent to maintain those conditions in the licenses. Quite simply, the Commission lacks an antitrust hold on PG&E. This conclusion applies regardless of the fact that the DCPP licenses are not now being transferred.

The Commission's sole antitrust authority derives from Section 105 of the AEA.

In CLI-03-2, the Commission noted its "obligation to respect our congressional grant of authority," citing precedent for the proposition that an agency's jurisdiction may not extend beyond the boundaries defined by Congress.

Id. at 34. The Commission also, previously, thoroughly analyzed its Section 105 on April 12, 2004, PG&E notified the NRC that it would not implement the license transfers and that the transfer consent would, by its terms, become null and void on May 31, 2004.

PG&E, on April 13, 2004, moved to Terminate the NRC adjudicatory proceeding that gave rise to CLI-03-02. The Commission granted that motion in CLI-04-18, dated July 7, 2004. The Commission decision in CLI-03-02 was the subject of a petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Docket No. 03-1038. That petition for review was dismissed as moot by an unpublished order of April 16, 2003. The Court of Appeals subsequently vacated CLI-03-02 in accordance with A.L. Mechling Barge Lines, Inc. v. United States, 368 U.S. 324 (1961)), because the Commission decision became moot pending judicial review.

'° See also Florida Power& Light Co. (St. Lucie Plant, Unit 1; Turkey Point Plant, Units 3 and 4), ALAB-428, 6 NRC 221, 224 (1977); Toledo Edison Co. (Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1), ALAB-323, 3 NRC 331 (1976) (reactors licensed as research and development facilities prior to the 1970 antitrust amendments are excluded from antitrust review).

5

0

)

A.

EXHIBIT 1

=---

UNI1E: STAT8C CLEARREGvU!ARY CO;..1'!iON

< ;S-^<wr *;,

WASHINTON*lY D;C.120S35

> -- 4

{

Er -i) S 51B

.~*

9

.E'SI~

Docket Nos. 50-'275 and: 50-23 Mr. John C. -Morrissey Vice'Presiedent :&

Genera' Counsel Pacific Gas &'ElectricCompany' 77 8ale Street San Francisco, 'Calfornia 94106

Dear:

Morrissey:'

SUBJECT:

AVIENDIENT NOS. 1 AND 4 TO CPPR-39 AND 'CPPR-69 (hiablo Canyon Nucl-ear Power Plant.'

In your letter:to the U. Si Departiment of Justice (DOJ) dated April 30, 1976, Zyou

'stated that,- inthe event a construction persiit for -the Stanis.'.-js Nuclear'Ptoject was not.i ssued by the NRC prior to July'l 1973, PG'- ;:as

-w'iingto.have its lifcenses), -for th.e Dablo -enyon Nuclear Power

r.

Unit~s

.:and 2:, ameded toincorporatw-e certain :an trust colm itments.

h's

'upbn th;.e ""D advis iiig' 'he lRC -that 'iono it heai-ingwas neces~salr~y h-connect:ion with licensing the Stani5laus Pro;e^-.

Tle' 0(!3 pro~vi~deds adni¢e in'a letter '>dfted Mlay 5:, 197.

Since no construction permit for the S-tanislaus Project had yet been isu;'d,

.the 'NRC statf a'divjised: PG&E, n a letter' dated September 15, 1978,o' i:cs intention: to inchude the antitrust com itments as conditions in tht 'i C'arPvon Construction Permits.

PG&E responded, in a letter dated Sepr.c;;=:r 1973, stdting that i.t fiad-no objection to such an amendment.

-Accordinly, the W6uc-ar Regulatory Commission has'issued Am-ndmen

Ios.

1 and 4:,.respc tvely;-!to the ProviCional Consrruct'on Permiit Nos. CPR-and CPf-69 to provide for the addition of certain antitrust conditicns to the 'Construct ion Permits.

We. have determined that the. a~rndments arc 2eaadministrative actions which do.not alter environmental impacts described.in the Final Environmentirl-Stateent or create new im.pacts not previously addressed in the-statement.

-Therefore, 'no environ ental-

-ipact apjraisa1 or negative declaration ned' be prepared..

.P 2is

-d e

• a a

.g.

.4, a

I I

-1

Mr. John C. Morrissey j.-. g, * " ;f-t; ;

IVS~

Copies of enclosed.

forwarded Amendment. No. l to CPPR-39. and Amendment to. 4 to CPR-69 e Also enclosed is a copy of a related notice which has been to the Office of the FEDERAL, RESISTER for publication.

Sincerely,.

Roger S. Bayd, D1'rector N' I Oivision of Project Man ement2.,

Office of Nuclear Reactor Feguiat.-

ToIe."a.

4~..I %J. US 6

1.

Anendment Nos. 1 and 4 io CP2R-39-a2nd CPPR-69

2.

FEDERAL REGISTER N1otice

3.

Evaluation Supporting Amendments ccs w/enclosures:

.1See -next page

, 1

S~~~~C

.'. '-"e.'T'

!.i-

.~;.:Mr. ;Jhr,~C. Morrissey:

.rn

-a--, De

' Cc Cal.fornia Dept. of Heah-ATTVi: ;.C-hief, tEnvirTn'mentzl Radiation.Contro' 1J.-f,-

Radiologic I.ieali ie SectcIn 714 P Street Room 4

.Sicsi-eent~o, Caifitorni a ChdirJnan, San.Luis.bisp Cuunty Board of Superv.,Sors

.Courtty-, Court-ou.se 4nnex.

RooM. 220 San Lufs -:Obbi spo,qCahi fornra 401

..,:'-1i'S.

EnvironP PrcGltidn Ag ReATT:ESCo Ofrd1.nator'.

f" Region 'IX. Office:-

in fA P..t_: 2

...... 2 i, O'S '1273 Dr. W. Reed JohnSon Atomic. Safety & Llcensing Appea.t Board U. S.,Yuclear Regulatory' Commission Washington, 3. C.

20555 n r.Y Al~an S. Rosenthal, Esq.

Atomnic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board

.U. S. Nuc~lear.Regulatory Cormission Washington, O. C. 20555 It;U-wa I ITor hid. S-.Feel.:

Svt Franc ico, C.-aIlforni

§411;-

Mr. John Marrs anaging. Edi..or SAn Luis.Obispo County.

Te~leram -: Tribune.

1321.Johnson Avenue; P. 0.

ox

.12..

San-Luis Obispo, Californi a G3406

Elizabeth S.B owers,: Chairman A

to.

Mic Safety &L-ice-nis~irSSard U. s,. N ucter Regu1Cdtor 20iss5iOt h'2shington', 0.. C..

20555 I-r.*G enn; 0. -Bri ght w-Atwmic. Safety S Licensinnn oard.;

ll. S.

Iuc-ear lSgSulatory 1Son Vashington:, 0. C. 20055.

Tolb ert Young Avila Beich, California 93424 4

a Old WJ~~ARREdJtA4TO RY.C0Mf61SSIfO N WSHtNGTON 0 DC.20555

'a'4 u...

%4c PAc' t,CII.~GAS VvID ELECTRIC Cw*:PA;Y

!)

VVY0'YtR NUCLEAR POWER PLA.NT; UNIT 1)

. DOCKET ;ro. 5o-275.

.D r.T T0 PRO'iISI.VO'AL CO'NSTRUCTION: PERMIT

.uAmendmnent

-no. 1

,,-^n A.

ConstructLion.

ermIt tio.*

• t'VX-5<

The

H r RegOui etI r Co ilm on (-NRC) havin9 found thet,

-i-.

T' fnen to Construc'ion Permit. No. CPPR-39, for t0e ppuirpcse oi 2uo5..-ding iwi the Constiruction Permit-the antitrust comitment.

in. P.G&E. 's letter of Apri I-30, 1.76 to the Departmnent o-

• s;S-1.

co:;,ill ec ith the standards and re uirem ents of the At ic.

EvL:

i'

. of- ;54 as amended, and. the Com,"mmission's regulations s.-. 6 inl 100CFiChapter 1;

• .2.. Ti

-st'ence o-'

t is amend!ment is in accordance with 10 CFR Per 5.;

.an

.P a'.

.r 3..

.b.h t<nce.of thAis aendment will not b.1inimical to the cor.imon:

d 3r cu..iy or to the health and safety of -the pubsic; an::

4,..Prir.

ifc.-notice-f this" amendment is not required since the me;-:i~Az.eit does not-involve a-significant hazards consideration.-

c.

Accdii¢'1y strucii Permi No:. CPPR-39 Is hereby amended -by adding

i paregraph 2.D. which reads as follows:

.C.. This Construction;:Petmit is subject to the-followina antitrust

-co -,d 't-4-ons: -

( I)'.

j ODe f 4:ii tt icns

(.a' "App,

.ant-meanrs PecJific Gas and Electric Comiany, anv succi.s "r-corporation, or anyy assitgneee of this.-Iicense.

(l)(b)

"ServIce Xrea" means.that area within the exterior

. geogranhic boudar ios of the several areas electricaly served.at retill,'nbw or in the future, by..Applicant, andt hose areas in Northern and.Central California adjacen"t thereto.

(1 )(c).."ehbcri ng Entity" means 2 f inanci Ily respoos 4 privae or -vub c enC ity ori 'lza fl:ssociation therec'

nincont-ractua-1 ]

cor.-oll-in-g-or aperal'i~ng cr ir good faith proposing to own, to contrattuaIly-ccr-or trw.

eperIte fciIii;e Sfor rth cenerat",n, or trea:s-1n.ssivn.3t 60 ki"'vol'ts or above, of electrric power 8I214e,

04 "C

hich In e es each o:'he fotllowinoj crit-eria.:

(1) its exi-sting. or voropo;ed Facilities are'or will beI tchni.

ca-l0Y feasi be of direc t interconnection wlth those o$'.Apphlio' (23 all or part of its existing or prcos

.ecilitic

'vre or willl,e. located.within the Service. Aen; (3:) its ppn rposy

e.

J for own;ning, contractually.con-

,trolling jr opsrz-nt;,generat'ion' facilities is tc se!l in the Se0.'-cc.:Ar,;a t;re power generate'd; and (4) it f;,

or upon c ev,%nceem an of operations will br, d Public:

uti i'ty rc ulad,nder applicable state lai.or the Federal..Pc;e Act6, or exempted from regul ation by.

.,virtue of-`thie' factt that it is a federal, state', munici;^;

or other

-pblic, ntty.-

• (-(d) *'e~ighbcring Oistr~ibutiscn Syst+m" Imeans a financially responsible privde cr public enti:ty-whicn eniaes, cr in

.ood faith proposes to engage, in the distribution tf

.electric power at retail and -which meets each of the criteriaruniumbered (1), (2), and (4) in subparagraph (c) above.

.(1)(e3 "Costs" means all capital expenditures, administrative, generalopera.tioi d.nd maintenance expenses, taxes, depreciation and costs of capital including a fafr and' reasonable return on Applicant's investment, iihich are properly allocab'le to the particular service or

.trnsaction as deter ined by the regulatory authority having.-j.urisdiction over the particular service or transaction.

(l)(f) "Good Utility PrcticeY means those,practices, methods

...and equipnent, rincdudiI level s of reserves and pr. :is :

f...for COntin enCieS, i

s

-atodiffed frOm time tO.titme, t.S_.

are. coronoV Aased in the Serv.ice Area to operate, re i&_

and safely. '.16Ctiic powJr facilities to.serve a Utl'4':7-Z own CUStO; ers:.de rndatlY economically, with due re':ar.

for the conservat on pf natural resources and-th; nrc'. c. n Of the ennvironaert Of ';he Service Area, provided SuCh

~:

PraCt;CeS, methOds arz. equipnent are not unreasonab-y restricti-e.

(.(1)(9)

"Fi.rm Po-orr" te:nS that power which is intended to be available to the tC ci

' er at all tires ank 'for ivh1.Ch, in order to aWh,.6ve that degres of av7ilabili.ty, ade!;-

installed.and spi;nninig reserves and SUffiCie'ttran_

.tO inove SuCh poCer cad eeserves to the load. center are provided.

- - w (2) n~e-connectl oib-Vi'ce-ns-,e -.

condi,t-ions. shall be s~b,'cc tto tL fi (2Jea Applcant,- shil Dot unreaschably -refuse ~

rtr~cc.-

and-prf nral inaa1e.wt Non i-'41'

• bto--y~eK uh*nerccn cAon~hl1e e

wj~h~b~d 2 Mt.ijt Prc.ce (2b necinc-ovh) e n~atAteoins a 1-~s

!;h'4-w en

.In~o1n c-lnYha1lse,,beeiitdboJ

~~

co-an

'li gveveg'ar drvso~ttaa*iihbrnEtt or neti b'thr b Aphfcntt-4n the same geo::~h t

ara nq ue c:':.

(26ciItrcnn.t'n gPret fthrll'jf

~

prvri o I-tw -.c.

({.)Th-C.st'G

'a"diioa fclii~ eqhdt sevieant eponcT.u-of5n~ronc~o~.*~lb

?l pon i~

h pbrojcedrvmr b"Net

.P

~arty~f~tt~rcNrefgctio,~t tftYe.r'.bs~ert-i faista~tci h wIche t'owe itr fc tncr,sso f~i~jti~s-ar'-to beused unAs t.Aie thra~pbti es (2Ve nintercnr.tiria.-ei.net hal y

i~poe.Mai, xchaged~Pndr KtiO acrheit-.--hs ex6jcta.ny be,.

re.

byG6Ut-t Patc

-7.

(2()AnitecolfeCtif,"il'e" t s ja not piroh-i bit

.)

ia r. y.rmftir11 firo oh I ;r

cunnect ~i grenn bt, inay.prvd thA P

APp receive ~-.3"Z e

• ter, 2,)-the p iatr jdi nt'

~'

sde-r and agrep, uvc'i.

~ dd J:onjV- 0lr~UPo~

reasures., Q~r ecqu i C vhjch.-mayn-iey-requ~ired.b DOJ*.

.jt*r a ti c eas a..rL rs:,.

`4h4 -Ai tvr c ohn ec ic-ar~et1~~ ~aI ity. 6f its

• t~env6r-or'I, tois.CUdtA!d d V.

u.dheodvers ery.

-~

- af~ct'ed~~b sich.dd~itnal n.~cn~~~l.arne~tt ean e

o h-pI.f

.. Dstrc

-,.tmay.Sil'ei.c

!anevnt 8tOhncQ"rdi em en

-rq ng-,J9 ~i

irrV, nt-yorN iib r gfut~ne ers lodi 3

eeVe OIdilt-l usat v-ortes ca -

• .~terPS a

'.t`wuy.

ch 4rordfl.

es."ecorin

-conall iedjon,:flacire

e. er'/nS d~Al1'buer ecsed h ~se

-I...

marentvcO Qfezt.

Imaf,

-"t oa n

h tr

-11 0seU'ctj E equl t P

lanne

-L reevsfrtntprino i g' r"Odseli, ito Afnat s c-'

3

.4

.fPP icahl' thragyP~

Naei of"Fbrri Po,,er.Aty%

W~i

-ie different Isre r peceittr geS

'j Ia n sp9fie 1nvroSil~r~i shl-breurdtopoie d

grea 6

r re.ee rcn

-a

.,Aqth

..t.e S rv S,..pi'tmt S,

prok todan.,~

system!

e 1eib'lt c.a to tae, 4s-1:ingbL e~ithor t

ofter newC 0rrange~isv rthm phe ote pah r et in th f~,l~amu~it f suh intitC

-.5-..

(31(b).Applic-ant end. leihcH, ntt~

f ~j*

t cornnets:. oahIu~joint'y. e~t a b Iis~ r~

th~

mfimu~

pi nn ind resere

.Ž

.'1

'agreed upon "s iri~

roserve

'a-

~ ecentol of

ck.cdai tK

,.tIA r C percent'Age s.hall be~ a t l.ea s't. Crvi

(

I~

'7K.

SS p;

reserepret~

wt'out th~ r.-i Enti ty sAl not1`

be ic-red so

"'v-'

An sr2n1 gre r:

4 for-:that' portion of i t sloed aaivi cf.L eeUthrouah,

.purchas'es:,of FrPor hl'vfe rent Sp".n~ni resIt

1. .pEdein C6:is miay be-sp-cf-i ie'd - i '

~i uus *n t e r

r~tn agqr.-eemen~tmS, no.party, q~-

1nt mec!'Imi C tai 0.I-v e ee nt

%hl

e.

reou.lred. to:,provldee -.4.-r a t erl~

.le sr"Ju s'r percentage,: t-ntat*-tip'

~..

roVi 'dS,-

excp if th t:otaI, pinnq-reserviej 4; dri t s; pro i dIA' maint&in hytn&laiiyer2 at f~xist~g' re ason.* of he newv rarngcrentp.ntinor prty.0 parti~~~~0es -may.'be. requi rc.dt rvecacfto;is~n rese-ves. intef4 ai;iuat, offSnJch incrcnz~.

'(3)(c plcn saVo e to' sell, on rea~s.orablt t e rms. r c -ndiUnsI nldo specffi-d pj~eHic ;--.;Pacaty t.6

• egboringh "Ent:;ity" fdr' us a

svsif utc' cpc.~

ne-te neeedfor.: Apl-fcnt'.sa~sscrnro~rc:~

cmitd toohf nd, If.t hcA 1 4i-bbricn, Ert:!-ty~ wE U offe At

'l, oh~ re., zoo Tbe Atrhm-nd-:c rd1fton~,V--

own' sch capcty. tc sAppI c a nt.

~3)(

A ppl icanhtm.ray includ in

.ry r:r6n.ct~'~ho1-Vsoviions.+/-requfinIrg a Alei tv ori.n4 y.

hpiietfrayrs-e:

pi-lchnr y

-,I i&;.

maintai al o-ri art. sKtI-Appjcel-v~

i' cs

,C

.~.the result- ~of t hel fall ir of!?

'I

• ~igr~~j Ct -1 t~o profvid eI in sa id i q Urc -n n e tctk i aar~eem (3(jAppI Ic dnt s.h.l affer t~.oordn;~mrtr~;

With T~e~ihb~oring. Enltit kes i.riterccnrnet t'd -wi 'i, Ac.P!

a id, to e~ychaiaep or scl ea~~enecpcy:r nt c-whnsuch: capOacitya rd onergv ara iavai1' In A, -1

'reasonabl

'to d o -v-i: a acr.3C-vit h..o ~it Prac Ice.

I

.4..

4

• i5y 4..*'<

... I:.: h.: I.-,.:

. i

.N a

.q m

. - (4)

Emergency'P'ower Applicant shall sell emergency po'ier to any interccr Neighboring Entity which maintains the level of mi ni reseirzvetgre ed-upon with App1icint, agrees to use'du-.

i lience t correc-t the emergency,`and agrees to se&'.

iemergency power to Appldcant.

Applictant shall enca^&

such.t'ransactions if and when capacity and energy f or such transactions are availabl.e' from other sources,.

-.on 0-y-tothe extent. that it can do so'without :impairi

• servicet 'Applic'ant's retail'or who-les'ale power.cust::.

or *lmp airng its.ability to discharge prior ccnmitre^.

(5)

Oeth erPower Exch nges

.-Sh:,uld Appl.icAnt.have on efi-le.,

or herreafter. fle,1wir.

• fF~derali.Pvotier Comnissin., agreemens or rate schedule:

• 'prvidiifor the sal.e and' purchase of.short-term cag.. i and energy, limiited-term capac.itfy and energy, long-te-,e capacity and energy.or economy energy Applicant.shi 1.

.on a.

fai.r and equitable ba's isenter'into like or.sl;:.

agre.ements. with 'any:Neighb'orng Entity, when-.such for:^.

of capacity.and"6ene-rgy are avail'abl'e re.cognizin-g the pa:st experience, dfferent economic condi'tions and Goo Utility :Practice may j-ust'fy dif fer'ent ra-tes, te rms a.

cond.itions.' Applig antshall resond promptly t-o inc,:.-

of$.eig hboring Enti tes'cnc"erning the availa"bility o'

such forms.of. capacity and energy from it's system.

(6)

Wholesa'le' Power' Sales Up.on request, Applicant.'shall offer to sell firr, fulo

• epartial.requirementsp ower for-a 'specified period tt..

interconnected zNei..ghborinfg Entity or 11Neighborin isn

-* 'butionSys temn under.a cotract wi.th' reasonale te's

• n

'conditions ic.udfing p'rovisions which -penrit App..plj.ca-'

.recover

'.its ' Costs...Suc. h'whollesa le power 'Sal es -mtsUt,

con~sistent..with Good Utility -.Practice.

Applicant. s.l not be reqir.'ed to.sell Firm Power at wholesale. if it

not haves'available suff.iciet.generation. or.transmssiw

'tosupply' the reuested service or'if the sale 'would.

service to 6i ts. retai l`_customers or its ability to disc prior oTnItments I

4.

I - - __ ___

-7 (7)

Transmiss~ion Services (7)(a) Applicant shall transmit Ipower pursu.nilt to agreements, with provisions which are appro,;rt.

requested-transacticin and which are ccnsist-- v.

license conditions.

Exccpt as lis'tc helow; e r-shall be provided.(l) between two or n;

o r'

a leighboring Entities. or sections of a :'Nelwo.

y n

system which are geographically separa.ted, now or in the future, Appl icant is.intercnn

(.

between a;Neighbbring Entity-with Whichi, now* or I 1 future, it is interconnected and one or nor Distribution Systems with which, now or in th

'ture.

it is-connected and (3) between any feightnoriin:;

nt I'eighboring-Distribution System(s) and the hr` '-'

point of direct interconnection with ary ot system engaging *in-bulk po;er supply 'ou:tside electrically-served at retail by Appicant.

f.I:u.-..: s:

not be required by this Section to trant pr t7.

a hydroelectric factility the: ownership bf whic:"

b.n involuntarily transferred froin Applicant or (2)

Neighbori.ng.Entity For sale to any electric sys'e:c; ei outside. the exterior geographic. boundaries of. t sev'-, I ireas then electrically served.at retail by Applic."t i.

other Neighboring Entityi Neighboring DistriftN.

c:: n orApplicant wishes to purchase such power at an.t c price for use within said areas. Any Nei hb rcnr I-Neighboring Distribution System(s) requesting tr nv-serviice shall -give reasonable advance nctice to of its schedule-and requirements.

Aprjticarit s',,711 St u

required by this Section to provide transnisscl:; servce if the proposed transaction would be inconsistent Oni:

Good Utlity Practice or if the necessdry trarcii; facilities are coinr itted at the time of the.r-fully-loaded during the period for whiih serv.c.

or have been previously reserved by AppltcaSts fc purposes, loop flow, or other uses contistent i; ;.

Utility Practice; providedi that with respect to M t C Northwest^Southw'est. Intertie, Applicant shall r ot te r--

r by this-Section to provide the requested trani-.ss-;r-se if it would impair Applicant's ow usc of this f ac i. t consistent with the Bonneville Project Act, (50 SCŽ*

August.O, 1937), Pacific Northwe.st Foruer "arkot; n;..c (78 Stit. 756, August 31, 1964) and the r'ublic ':oik-Appropriations Act, 1965 (78 Stat. 682, AugustO 1;.

urn

!IM rnml
-'M`Ivift

I j

.(7)(b) Applcdnt..siiall Inclode in its planning and constcuctlon program.; -s:h. increAsesin its transmission capacity or such:add4't:;o.'-:l trantlniision faclities as may be requCreS

-for the :-.r~siactions referred to in paragraph (a) of tvii

Sectiori, t

.ioted' frv ;ai ghboring Entity or' %ei-hboir.i

-D.istri itij s.tn a;ves App'ic'rit sufficient advance

'A oa vanc rom.:a-be necessary to Qacconrwiodate itS requireme:"ts fu-h-.

.fro m an7 t'chnical standpoint and providd-

.her e

n the;e.iy request-i'ng transmisssion servicc-s compensaf.se;:Atplicat for the.Cos ts incurred as a result.

oUf their&

s W.hi4rie transmission c-capacity will be cinreased iin;- :ddit-ional *transmission facilities will be.

nstal.l eri t provide or a~intai~n -thle-requested serv~ice to

-a Neigh~rro Entity o) ?4e ighbring Di stribution Syste-,

-ppiica n

y reui re in addi tion. toa -

ste se o-other fLcil ities; that payient~of Costs assomiated witti t lincreased aer pi

or cddit onal tc i lit tes shal Ib. e miade

• -::. by:the p?4s in a

ordane

i.ih d tn advance of th i-r respect.ve

'e o'f te new capacity br fa 1

iries.

(7)(c)

Flothi 1oh;'

einsha21 r"quire Applicant (). to construct if the constructio o A~dd t filna t ransm lis! icl 'fac'ilift ies if-the cotstrcino.-

such :fa-cilities is inconsistent with Good Utility Practice or if such facilities could be constructed without duplicat'na

-any porn of ApplIcent'-trantsmiss-ion

system, (2) to prev de.

r;

.f.-

t Sron islans se erv fct to0la-etretail Customer or (3) to ConSZcJ tr.dnsssicn.outside the-area then electrically served at retil by Appl icant.

(7 d)

Ra-te

'zuices and agreements for transmission services l

provided w

-r this Sectioh. shall-be filed:by Applicant.w%,n.

the regul tcry aget:y having jurisdiction over such rates an!. aregncinrts. a

.c..

.a.....

-e n<d

e r e x t (8) mcess oto Nicear Generation (8)(a) f a6i f

1tisor ing Entiity or -Neighboring Distribution Systui

.seks 2. t ime'y request to Applicant for an ownenr-shjip participation: in the Stanislaus Nuclear Projec.,

OUiiit ho

-oany future nuclear-generating uni t for n.n c Appljicant: applie:s for a const-ruction -pennit during thie:

20-ya0 r period im m

e tiIte:y folloiiina the date of the co6nstructioi,:rn-it for Stinislaus--Unit Ho. 1, Applicant

-shall offer t-herequesting party an opportunity to parti.

cipAte in such 'units, up to an. aount reasonable in li,'

C.

p ~moni'.eaioa

'.i

of the rel'at'iyve-' lods of the-.partic-ipajit.s-With esp.

to Stani'saus-.Unit.Io.

1 or any futtjre n-clee...

.unit,.a.

request for. parti-cip3tion shal -be-de-'!;' iI-'

'f receive'd ithn, 90a'd'y after the it;ailng I:

ri

.i;.

1-.'

to Ne6ighbor'i.ng Ehntities and :ibring Disrt on c

of an arnnoitcement of its intent to construct tVe and a-request $for an expression of in:Lrest in i

i-t, Participationfl..

shall be'on a d

Applicant for a reasonable shar.re of al. its Cots, i

and to be incurred, in.pi.anning,'se3ecting a sitei 'c constructing.-and' peratitng th-e'- facility..-

-(8)(b) Any -Neih oboring.E:,nEltiJy orri.r;:3 Sytein naking a.-timely request`? for p irt-i pt ri,

t i.

nu~c1l.ar,;n-ituS~t ui.:enlter 1-nto--a. legall.y bt.ndiny.sri eri.t'<!-

'.a'ble:'agte'eln'e~rt rto oassubme fi'n'en~c'ial '.,-Ie'DoinS ibihllv;,o-^t

-ci.

. shmara'.'.of,

-the4Costs;,issociated wfit/ith pa rtI1patioi in~ i "uit

,nd

.'ass-~i:te'.tra'nissiOil fdtl-es Uii a

s,-a.

n

' ~~~othIer~wise.'

agreed by,........ :Appli'c'an't',-,a'.'eighbori-ng Entity' rA.,

I leighyb r'ngDistributionSy-stem-desring' p rtwiCnic. C

-must have-sgned n

swh an agreement with'n ont'yr

. ' '-'Applicant, hs:ro3viledtto tha-Ne.igIbori-ngEnttyor

' ~Neig~hbori'ngD~is-tribu~tion, System 'pertine~nt findn~1cial'dd-

'technicel data bearing on the feasibil ity of tr'.

froe;1

'. - -.' which -are thea ava........

i'>abie-to.Appl~icant...Apphc.ent,sI~a'i..-

~prov'ideN'a-dd~iio'n'-VP'tIrti'ne~n~t-da~tE as t hey^beccr:a av* 1 z*c....

'duringthe ye'ar, Thereqtesting

>a&r-ty 'shall pa to

~~Appl icant fort~hwi~th the? add-i:tiona-l expenses v'cuired-a Applicant in niaking such financial and technic'l c fe

~~avail~ab'le....

I n' any..par-t'icipa~ti'on agreer!ent suDiect tr'.t,

'thisSection 1 AppliCant may require provisions ie payrnt by each participant of its

.share of nl'

.incurar ed up..to thdate of.tfe-a-ree,.nt; rqh i-

~--,

a~rt-icipaint ther.eaft~er to pay it's pr& rata shar:o'--^

s.they

.iare.:expec'ded.f or th.e panntg nd Cei¢',;c, of' units and related f

-cilities,-and requiring,eac

~~~~part ici pant.to. mak~e sl~ch.fi nanci21.arrangemnentcs esna

" " necessary --to bnsure the.abity of th-pa'rtiiit tc

contine to make such puym ents.

.(9) plementation y

(9j(a)

All rates, chdrcesA terms6and practices are an-Chsi P.be subject :to the-ceptace and approval of, g

-' rt I

Om' tory agencies Or:COulrtS ha~ving jurisdcticn over tre~.i.

M -

'I

• ..*..

r o' 10..

• (9)tb) : Nothing. contained herein shal l enlargei any rights of a Neighboring Entity or Neichboring Dist'ribution System to provide services to retail custoiners of Applicant beyond the rights-they have under state or federal l';...

I.

(9)!c) tNothing in these license conditions shall be construed as a waiver by Applicant of: its rights to.contest the.

application of any commitment herein to a particular fctuda 1situation.

(9)(d)

These license-conditions do not preclude Applicant frcm applying. to any::appropriate forum to seek such changes in these conditions as may at the -tin be. appropriateInA accordance withv the-then-existirig law and Good Utility (9)(e).Thes~e1censecondoitons do.,not requiire Applicant to.

-becote a common carrier.

'C. This amendment iseffective as of the da'e ;'..issuance.

FORITHE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

.-.r S. Byd Director to fivicsi of Projecit anagemenrt-Ofice-oNuclear Reactor Regulation 0C 61 B.

Date of Issuance:

V

u.---STAES

~.

W.NU cR REGULATORIVCOMissON

.WASHINGTON, Ci. C. 20555

',*'°'>.'

.PACIFIC.

GAS AtiD ELECTRIC Ct'CPANY NI S

'.(DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR P.OWER PLANT, UNIT 2)

-DOCKET. NO. 50-323' ANENtNOENT TO PROVISIOilAL CONSTRUCTIO, PER.'IPUT Ain-endaient No. 4 :

Construct'ionPermit 1 o. CRPP.-6 A. The Nucleai Regul:atory.Co Mission ('NRC) hav.ing found that:

'1.

The.aniendmen't tb,-Cnstruction.-Permit No... CPPR-69, fc t he' purpose Aof inluding.iithe Cnst.ruction-Perm.tt the2 antirtrustt commit.ec!s

..stat&d 'n PG&E.'s 30

-ltei f'Ap~ri1 30,1976 to the Department.-

'o Just-i..complies with.t'he.

9statida.rds a'nd 'requirement-sof t-es.Atc;ric Energy Actf-,of t954,-sSarended,, and the Commission's regul'ation.'s set forth in 10{ CFR Chapter: 1;-

• 2. The issuance of this amendment. is in accordance with 10 C;R Part 51;

3. The issuance of.this amendment will not be-inimical to. the corzaccn defense and se'curity.or to the health eand sa:fety of the public; and

.'. '-4.

.PrEori

r.

publ-Iicnothfci'of :this amendmentis not-required since the anendment does not ivol.ve a-s igniflicat hazards -considerati on.

-a.

MO by.

B. Accordingly, Co..nstrduction Pe-rmit No. CPPR-69'ishereby hiended by adding.. anew, paragraph 2.D. --w.ich:'eads' as, f611ows:

2.D.

This Const.ruct'on P'ermit is fsubject to the following antltros conditions';,

().

efinif tons

-'..(l)(a) -

'.Apicnt." means Pacific.Gas and El'ectri Company,' ny successor cor'porati'on, or,any assi gnee.o this lic'ents.".

4.

If iI F.

r.I C

1 I

.(l)(b "Service Area2"..

means thatarea within teexterior.

-geographic bourndlries of the several areas electr-icel'ly

.Ser-ved -atretail, nola-or in the future, by Aplqicant,

.andthoseareasi-inNorthern and-Central,.California.c adjacent thereto.

f I) (C)"Neighboring:Entity" means a fi nancially responsible private orp.'ub.lic entityc-or l*awful association tIherec

ownsihn, contractuall~y controlling or operoting, or i.l

-good fdith proposing to own, to contractually cor;tro.

or 'to operate facilities for the generato'n, or tran.i-missionat 60 kilovolts or-above, of el-ecrric pc;i' 7 8t 2 1 4c-Z A7 -

~in ni m-2-~.

which m.eets eoi.i, oI the followIino criteria:

(1) its existing or pr oosed facilities are or will be techni-cally feasible of direct interconnection with those of Applicant;.' a.l or pa:rt of its existing or prorpsed fac.iltties, ae r will be iocated.within the Service Lrea; (3) its prima'.ry purpose for ovining, contractually con-trolling., or opieratinn generdtion facilities is.-to sell in the. Servic.2 Area the po>.er.generated; and (4) it is, or upon com*:imvce-ent of operations will be, a public utility regulatcd under applicable state l.aw or the Federal.Power Ac'.", or'-exe:ited.from regulation by virtue -of the fact that it is a federal, state, municipal or other pub-ic entity.

(l)(d)

"neighboring Distribution System" means a financially responsible. private. or publi c entity which engages, or.

in good faith proposes to engage, in the distribution of electric.power. at reteil and which meets eac.h of tne criterid numberedi(t) (7) and (4) in subparagraph (c) above.

(l (e) "Costs" means all capitaJ expenditures, administrative, general, opeiation and maintenance expenses, tayes, depreciation and costs of capital including *a fair and reasonible return on Applicant's investment, which are properly ialociltve to the particular servfco or transactfon as deternined bj the regulatory authority havilng jurisdiction over the particular service or.

transaction.

• ()(f) "Good Utility Practice" nmeans those practices, methods I i l

and equipment:, including levels of reserve.s and provisions..

for contingencies, as modified from thie to time, theat are co:Ruon1; used-in the.S'Urvice Area to operate, reflaoly.

and safely, electric oei factilitie.s to serve a utflity's oWin custoniers.dependably arhd economically, with due recard fdor the conservatioon cf natural resources and the prote o

of thc.environmnt of the Service Area, provided such practices, niethcIds and equipment are not unreasonably restrictive.

(l)(g)

"firn1 Po~wer"means that power which is.intended to be.

availIa4le to the customer at all times and 'or which, in ord'er to achieve that degree of availability, adcequ,-e installed and spinn.ing reserves ind sufficient trannpss on to move such power. and reserves to the load center are provided.

¢

-tL~r>

S

',a, X _.*-.

...
..... - I.
.

.,.
....

(2)

Interconnect-ion Interconnection -agreements negotiated pursuant to 4these

.icense conditions shall be sub-ect-to the followi:)

pdarasrahs (a) throush

'a):

(2)(a)' Applicant sha ll.not unreasonably refuse to interconn; c.

and. opera tenormally in parallel with any Neighborir; j Ehntity,:'or to interconnect with.any.NWeighboring Dittri-

'butibn System.

Such interconlec-tions" shall be consistent

.with

'Good Utility. Practice.

(2)(b) nt rc~on~nect~on shall be at.one point..unless otherwise:

aree by: the-parties to an interconnection agreerni'.n interconnectionshall not be limited to loier voltags.

-when higher vltages -re preferable from the standport

., 'of,;Go;od. tfitlity fract ice. 2nd:ar~e av~allablei from' Applis-ri-.

oApplicnt may include in.any interconnection agreernet'

'. - prov'isio.'ns tha.t *a.-leig~hbcring Enti~ty, or Neighborlng'

'D~is~tribution :System mainta~in 'thie power factor asscciated with its l:oa at,a corparable -lev'el-to tha t iaintaindpI

- 'by App

-icant.,the same geographic area i nd use ca:p.rable control method to achieve this objective.

(2);(c:) Interconrnection-agrerentsqshall not provide for mo.c extensive; fclitis "

or

-control eqpuent at th e poi..

f ntarconnectiona then arerequired by Good Utility:

Practice unless

.the pagrties mutually agree that parue cimpar

'.ci~rcum~s-tances -warr'ant special 'facil'ities.or.equi pmeznt.

• (2).(d3 The::Costs o,f..

.additional facilities required to pro'.iit service' tthe. poit of,i nterconnecti on shall be alolr o"

on the' b1is oftheptronecbted economic benetfats fter pi party from'the itntericnnectionrrafter-consiGdertion of.1 various transactiions for IwhIch the interconnection

-2 ) f eCoists.e

-adretiobeil. unfaciltes areqreds to-o p

bvi -

the parties.

used, unlss otherwi.se agreed.b 7

(Z).(r4 An interconnection agreement: shall not impose liimfta;iois upon the use or resale of cipacity-and energy sold er exchan ed under the aagreement exce-pt as I'may be requi'~d by Good:Uti-lity Practice.

4

-n a -,

'.,-n.

(2)(f) Aiu interconnaection

-arit shal not prohibit any party from e-ntering i other.. interccnnection agreemeants, but mhay provide that sI! A.,plicatn receioe adequate

-not:ice of any.dltiu Inrrriinec~ldn arrangement witih others, (2) pc part k

t; oi ntly -consider and agree upcn additional cn-racru s.o-:v; o, s

,on d

asures, or equiprmenr, which may be riequire4 41 Good 't i ity, PractIce dS resu!t of the,new arrargoee.ren', a, (3) d

.p. icant.m ay te rminate the i':nte~rccuan,ec-n z>;,r.-oent 1', the -reliability Of its system or service to iLs custcmers %vould be ddversely af f ec.'t by such dd-itioial intcrconnection arrangemlent.

Applicant mi.y include:. provisions in an finterconnection:

agreement requiriing,a Nel ghboring Entity or I~ighboring Distribution:.Sstem to tvelop:with Applicant a ccordi-nated progra:n.or unere-vency 1oa-shedding and tie separat:ion.

Under sici programs the parties: s-h.ll equitably share the irr'erruption or c-urtailment of customer l oad.

(3)

Reserve Coordination Interconnection agree-l.e!ts *negotiated pursuant to these

-license condit'ons,shall be' subject to tihe following:

paragraphsie) through (e) reogarding reserve coordir.ation:

(3j(a) Applicant rand any N4ei.hboring Entity.with which it inter-connectsishafl jointly establish arid, separately m Maintai.

the mi-nimunm reserves tb be' instailled or-otherwisf e rovidoJ under an interconnecticen 'agrecment.

Unless otherwise.

nittalfy tagreed upon. -reser.es

-hall-be-expressed a-s percentae o f estimated 41frrm peak load and the xinim'cri reserve percentage shil.e eat least dqua1 to Ap)plicdnr' planned reserve. percenll'-e'.without the. interconnectont.i:.

A Neighboring Entiy-s`h Ey S not he required to provide

- reserves for that pct~ion-of its lcead which it

%nee'.s

.throuch purchasJ s oN Firri Power.

• hi~e dif.'erent reserve percentages inhy be specified in various interconnection agreements, no pdrty tc an.:intercorect ion a.greement tshall be requi rd to. provide a greater reserve percentage

-than.Applicant's pliined -reserve..'percr~ntage, except tha ifthe total reseryves A1pIlcant'l;iust p-ovide to iieintotn system rel:iability equal Lo that exist;.ig Wit';otut a given interconnection arranuemtent are increased by reason of the new arrangement, thtcn the 'other party or parties may be required'.to ins.tall or *pravide Odditional reserves In the full znotunt ff such increase.-

(3j(b) Applicant and Neighboring Entities. with w'hch i; ht r-connects shal l jointly establ ish and..szopeat.ely mw.'

the mlnimui spinning reserves to b. pncc ;:

urt';:

interconnection agreement.

Unless. oti.

MU r......a'

-.agreediupon, spinnin reserves.shal be re'..resse..

a percentage of.peak. oad. and the mtindii:'.::.i spIn nr.:

s percentage shall be at.l-east.7Kqal Lo A,~'icont reserve.percentage viithfout thie intercori

- 01 E

ntity shall not'be required to prov.ide 1srnnir.l ?

for that--portion oits.1oad trhhich L' tht-irc..-.

uptrchasts of -FirmPovier.

While. dif ferer snni

-.re percentage.s:-.ay be speclfied in var`ious:intercni.:

agreements,-

F o;party t an i

-sha.ll -brequired -..

to _phrov-ide:.2;.greater spinnir.-i re.;-.

-perceintage ;than'that ifhich)Vppl1cant'provi'es, c; t"

.:-if.the t otaf.spinn reserves ApplicahI

ust prov ;.'

.naptamsy~steni reliability eqalto", t h'.t exiscI -

-a gi.venInterconnect.ion rrngerne-nt.are,--Icreos' c ;v.

reason.of the. new-arrarigeinenit,then the-oth'ier. par.

.parties may. berequiredd. to provide addit onal s;.-:

.reserves in.-the ful,' adiount of sush increase.

A3)().- App A can t sha..

l offerto sell. on.reason.ble ter.n;s.:

.c tonditions,, includingd.a specified peri~oi.,capaci y

...ghb-9.

-hring.vEntfty.

for,:.ie'as'res erves.i such ae...Ll ~ S

.neither 'needed' f-or A~ppilcnt' s o systAem n0ror4,l gtcn-ovr oritted 'to oU.ers and if. the faeiohbor.inq Enti*-

offer..to-ssell, on reastnableo erms and-Con it.f 1t.S

.own such capacity t' A kplicant.

-. )(-) -pplicant may incl ud e:-nn anY ihter'on

.p0oi.on-e

lirinh

-NOeich6bHonq. Enti.octe:s;

-Ap plicant' for.

any.eserves AppfifTant m,!.s avai -.

.-the r.slt f firre of'such.fIighbr-in Ent.

• laintain al o'r-any'pe-ar.tsof h e eseirve sis to-provi-de' I ai interconne ction'aarecr:t-nt.

-(3(e) Applicant shal-l oafl er to oord fnsate mB1i:ie!P:1Ce sc's'...

,with-,Neighboring -Entities-interccnnected-r i-t"",p!"',-

and to-exchangenor'wsell :ma n.en nce'carfecity afd c"-

whensuch capicity and energy-arev aiilai'ba dnd i

reasonable to dovso in-daccor

-t1e-te:ith tSood Ul'iiJ..

Practice.

z.

-PI E~

(4 )

fergency. Power Appllicant shall sell, emerEgency pouer t~o any i 'erCOn eighboring Entity which maintains the level.o.f-i:w.

.reer.e a:greed.upon with Applicant, agrees to.ie dl di lfence:.-to-correct the e'-ergenciy, and-agrees to se.'

e ergency power to Apolicant.

Applicant'shall an}:do-'

such transactions if and when caiacity. and eG;ey such.transactions.are ava-lable.frca; other SrourCES I

-'-"only-to the exten't that it can do so wathout i:,.ir'r;'

seriice..

to.-

Appli-c1ant':s retail.or wholesale pO' i

CU imrpiair,.ing'.eits.b1U.-y to discharge prior, cb..tz'.r (tS) zOthe-r,`Power Exchanges or:

.f.

ShoudApplicant.have on fil-e,, orhereafter fi ie,: w; drao.rPo.z'crm;ujsAon; agreements or rate' ci.edule-

'psovdingfor'.liedsa~l,.ad p~urchase of short-e:i

.n ca

.and'energy,li.mited-term capacity'and energy, h.:'--t capacityand energy.oreconomy energy, App.Vican.

5.;

a-fair and e'4uiteble basivs, enter into lik r

Or 5 -. '

-agr-eeents with-eany eigliboring Entity, wh'en. such fb.

-f '.,c1ty.and energ, y -a ravai lable, recognizing t.

pastiexperiencedifferer,t econodiic.conditions and Ge-j

-,.,r

e. may -Jstib

.y-diffeir-nt rates," ter.s con-dle't wbnsos. - kpplicahnt,.Kshtlh' respond 'promptly to in

-ti~etqhboring

£ntit'es concerning the Yai 1 ai1 itY c such Torms f c-apac.:ty

.andenergy. fro i-ts.. s astem...

.(6).

hiolesale Power Sales Upon request, Api caft-sha 1 offer to.sell rv-i;, ful,,

' pa~r.tLl.al,

~requirements,:.power for a speCifiedp~riXd.ZC.

-..-;ition:

~S~ystK unde~r a dnt~ract witvh reasoniablO aens Ž.

S

con~ditionsi-nc~ifng-provisions which permit A;icAkn.-

recover-i ts Cos sV Such wo lese1e spaleer s; i.:5.

.ctn~sstenttWit Good'tility Practice.

Appliczi.n sb'o n-t be r-equired to sell Firm Power at whoies:le ixf i not have ailable. sufficient:'generation cr trar:riis

-to.sup, y.ther-equest ed service o.-: i f the selh aue

'e.

se rvi ce. itsretai 1ustomers or i ts ability to L

i s-:.:

.pr.o -.

.n.itentt

c

!o 't

t thes INu z

.~.

(I) cransmission Services b

-' (t)

A4c-plickent shallt~trans~mit pow~er pursuant to lnterconnectl1cn'."

a.gree:.ents,,.with provisi~ons ichich are appropriate to the-reqluvst-ed t'ransaction a'nd.-'hich are..consistent with ;';ese

' i~c'ese condit~ions.

Except as l~isted belowY, such service

shelall be Provided (1I between tyso or.6monag more than.o beig hboring Entities. or sections of a tReighboring En~i:y'

.'sys te wh'ich re geographicall-y sepa-rated, with which,-

'.. now or in the futurej, Applicant is interconnected, (2) t:beten aNeihboring Entity w'ith which, nw or in the future;, t i..s' f'interconnected and onv or-more Nefighboring D

istributio'n.Sys-tems wiith'ih-ich-, now';;or'in the future,-

, i.s:connected.and i(3) between any Neighboring Entity or

-ihboring Di

.4stribut;ion Sys.te(s)-

'rnd the

.pplicant's poirlt'o-direct interconnecti' ith any ther electr.

sytmegg ng,-in buk p'o~er -su`PplJy out9'idP t-he aree athn.

'eectrically served -at' etail by-Ap'licant, Appitcant shal-not be, required by this Section to transmit.powerO) fr~i,

. -a:hydrodeect ricfac-'li.Ity.th e ownership cf which hasbeen inioi'untiril'y tras'erred-rofi Applicaint or (2) from a Neighboring Entity fov-sale to any electric..system located

-.outside.the exterior-.'~ogrephic '-boundaries.of the., several

'reas then ejlectrica'l'y

,served a'tret'ai Iby,Appli c ant ff arv.:

othe.rIeirghb6ng EMiioity, eighbor.

Distribution S.ste,,

A:or ppica'nt.,`wi.,she s-::o purchase such power.et an equivient p ri-ce--foruse-4i;t ini said areas.

Any3 leighborfngEnztY or

. -Neighboring';istribution System s) requesting trauAr.ssic'n serv'icesh

_l.give reasona e advance notice to Applican' of it;s 'chrdlielnd requireineint-s.-'.

Applicant shall not:

.e

'oeqired by-this Sec:on to'provide transmission serIce if the proposed tranisactiod n uld be itnconsistent.iith

,;e

-Good U-lity, ra~c.t-ce or if.'the-ne c

s'ser,;y trt.nis'icn, fafi:ities -:are tco.1 t

at; the. -tftrie -.of the recuest: to. te-.

I3e1gperL.i.U cd-fI' L

wIr, wi-ch serv ice is',..r eu t-s-o have, been previously reserved by Appl icant for emergerci'@-

j loop flow~ or thr uses consistent witi *cc-.9 Ut i`+ty-: Fractfcl p

vildcd.;that idtli respect. to the

' ruhwest-:SouthweSt! Intertie, Applicant shall not be rei by t~his Section to prov,.de 'the r~equested trensrissicn. sc-r-.;.cei^

if, it-would.,

patr-Appl:cant's.

rnuse of thics fity -

c-ns-tstent with the -8ornevi ieo P-ojecr Act, (:G Stz. 7a,

-hieeust 20, l937) Pac-ific urtwe*.-Po~er'arKeting s&

AT

28. S-,-Sa 756, Agust 31,

964) and the Public-orks Appropriations Act, 1965 (18 Stat. 682, August 30, 1 5'i6.

-m___ *(7 )(b) ) Ap i

int hail i t ncludIe in its planninfgand cfnstructioC profr-as such lncreases in its transimis$-on capacitY r suctI additional transm..ssionfl -acilities as 0iay be re'utr-

.for the transactions referred to in par graph (a) of :Htsi Section prov-ded -any Neighbbrifng -Entity or. Neighboring-

.ist'r utiol Systecn gives Appli~cant sufrficiept.8adVa.rl e not I.ce dS may be necess-ry to accoriodate it requrre

-tS frc:A a re;ulatory and technic-al standporifnt ~ad provi-dea furi^.w thit the nttity req-ueSttnig tr e rntflS iQlservicesr

¢- cowensates Appli.nt-for the Costs incurred as a reslt of thpye

'uest.'

Where transs.missicnf capcitty will

-be ioncr eised :orq ddi loal transe.i ssion if ti t will-.5e-instal led. to provhid~e ors rmaint2aifp t~ei Sreq~uested servi1ce: to -

.a KN.e i-gsb.hin9.'gEfltitY o.r-Nihoig0f~r.~to 5 ystpm,;..,

.Appl i~cantrny -reqbIi~re,..ej::n~ddjtiOfl to a rate-fior us-e of

.oth-er ~fic'li~ti es.,&that.:pay'menht of Cos~ts..ass2&c iated;. iiit hth:

d' dde C.:2Cil j OJ ba.*Sinlifi~ite~t5d t

ae -.

.by the par.,i.es..in accordan~e with and i e&a-r~ece of their.:.

respective use of the new capacity

-or facilitieS.

. L,..

-;,t..

.6

'et a

.;6

).

No~thinc here~in.sha lsl.re.quire *Appl i~cant,- (It)

.to co-nst~ruct additio~nat trahsmisiS~of faci-li.^ies: i-f thte cphistructiofl of

-. sutsch Jfhilities is inc'nsistent iith Goiod 't'I ity. PractiiC

• '.-orf s uch'ac1i.i.tyis o

.be constrI.,ced iwth; t i:Cd; ic tg

. any '-pr~'n-of*A.,o'ie.

(;anmsslonAsX

{)i.-to pro~v;de~,

' tran's;niis~sioI s,',.'c~t'oa:'reta iglcusZeme o'r.(3;) tocnz~s-traopmiSsion ouside.he area then e'luectricblly j-toco

-r ne"tdi lby-'Ayp Aicart d

Ii i

p)

Rateschedules and agreements for tr.nsnia.ion ser iCeS.'

• provbidd nder tils Secion shaif belfiled' Sv Applica.it w:t+

the regulse tvrY agf-eny hiaviig jurisdictipl ver Such.r' s

annd

-cos u

Accessto Nuclear Gerration

). If a !:eighboriisg Entits y or

-1ei ghbortn9. pitquticI' Sy~stem;i:-,erakes; a tili e; reque-st 1 o 'Appli iVcabt 1for an Owrner-~ *:-

shif partSicipatin in the Stin islaus e

9cies tFro ct

-U~nt-I-o. t or any fut~itlre-nuc1ei r-gereeratifl iu ni~t-lforvi~lc^ r A_-upOTa`cat appi-es fts a ncons sten cth-o dm rig.f ft ath-e.

~:20-&fear-period firnn.edi ate-ly. Jol owin Il e iPh t~e...

con.4stuction era i

bortali astrucr A~

opu 1cm ifg shalpl ofer the-requesting par :y a y a npar o

-cipate nsuch unitS, up to an au l:

itot.:

(7)(4

.(

.4..

(. ).;

(8)Ia

'.---*x

-1(1-

-(9.) (b) '.o thi.rg contained..herein shAll enl arge a iy il lh!.p f '

Neighbori.ng.Ent4i..y or Neighboring -Distribution SySt-;

.to provide services to retail custoirers-of Applc-t

-beyorhd the rich.s they have under $tdte or fedeer.

,n;.

i-othing in these Iicense conditions

.sn1i be'con tr.

as a waiver by Appliicant of its rihtse to contes.-,

a pi'catioin 'of -:Any. 0 ;M itmr~ettherein to a i-r-ticu- !

factual s ituation.

.::(d)

These iicense.,condi.tions do not.preclu.de.Applicant fion; applying' to any.akpIropri-ate forum to see'( such ch:t--

-n theSe:Condi.tionm,-s 2may at the time be appropr'b-r

.-atcrfdlAnce with. hiZ then-existing law anvd G.Od:tit.y (9)(e) "These. i Icense. ditions do not requi re Appl icant.,c

.becorne. a conv;on 6arrier..

This ztirendnent is e fective as o-l the date of issuance.

1

• 1 C.

NDOt.e:o6f. -Is:'Uance' :.0

9

,c

~_F TkE:

JCLEAR REGULATORY CCti S'i S.er Bd, Director 1-Division o' Project 4anaaemaetit:.

Offfice of. Nuclear Reactor Regula rio

4

-II 1

,j4 7,

II I I

UItED STATES NUCLEAR aEGULAtir C¶s' ::;

-DOCKET NOS. 5t)-275 AND.C -323 P;ACIFIC GAS AUD ELECTRIC CO".A-Y (Diablo Caijyon Nuclear Power Plan', Units 1 Ad 2)

-NOTICEt 4lISS. UANCE OF AMENEi IT OV cr.5 RtCTIO: ::4UT The U. S. Huclear Regulatory Cor.inl5sfl ('n-F:C) has isu Aed;:-

• nd' 4 respectively., to Construction Permit hos. CPPR-3'9 an d CPPR-4n

etsue, to the--Pacific Gas.and-EleCtr c Cbr.qatny for Qiablo CaIaycic Nu.

Plant, Uni-ts 1 an 2, locatied nSan.uis ObispoConty, I

. The.

nments.pro'e for te di.ion of irtain. at trust. cor~d:tg' The-Diablo,Canyon.Nuclear Power Ilant.is. not subjeC-tG n 2nt tfui s r-.: ' i munder Section lOSC of the Atoiaic Energy Act, as a'rended. -cre rec-power-plants -are subjectO such review.

Iio ever, in~ccr.nec t iO? t.e

N.N s prooedi

-Afthe i:Stan1sIA lS",uear-P oect;R fic-G s a1?

r

-d Coepany ag eed to n lve-t t

coiitmesnt as condi ons in.

the

-Caqyon licenses in certa n-clrcum nces which hare occurred.

In a letter to -t-e U. S. Dteent >of Justice d(),

aec A

^;,

197, PG&E-. fte4 ta t, in thevent caconstruction per'.i tor tne Nuclar e

rRCct was not sed e

b R prir to July 1, 13Th P:

willing to have its l-icense~s) fo tfre Diablo Canyn.'ucl: r ?ol.fr ? -s,

• hits'.1-and 2, ams dd to-i7tcrpoiate -certain antitrus o 4 ~l.

-wThis illiSS was consin ent cthe D: ayisina.'-

'2 i-;

trust hearing was nece5sary ib orne;iofl wi~h. licensinG t>'e S an s' s

Project. ;The DO} provided.$uch 2 vc in a letter dated ~:y 5, 1975.

...no

,J J

r.-.t lu

I ha e

'-t'A

~

i i

,-b

'I f!9es--w~

cntn tI OW.AVZat, o:

• ~12toZ33

0m

' I f;

Since no construct/ioa penit for the Stantslaus ProJe t had yet been:

Sic.-n con s

.t.u t-I1 on p:i i2.

ro er.

eter d

S'r i) m I---

issued, the t2RC staff advised PG&E, iJn a.

letterI d aed Septeber 15, i97.3,

• vi* 6 J 0,1 *.*i

• of its intention to inciude the. antitrust commitients as conditio

's in

.theDiablo Canyon Construction Peimits. PG.E responded, -in a letter d-atedc September 1.9, 1978, stat.ing that it had no objection 'to such an a enrdment.

The amendments comply wV.h the standards and. requuiremrent s.

of the Ato rIic Energy'Act of:

94,.as amended (,the Act), and the -Co' ission's regulations.

The staff s made appropriate findings as required b2.the Act and the

• CComissions:sh reguaions

-l n10 CFR':h h,

re set for i

the amendment.

-Inaccordance with 1O.CF. 50.91, prior-public notice of these an;etnidmnts.

wras not required since the amendments do not involve 'significant hazards a

i -n..

d-...ctnrdmfIdt,-!t

-,he,,,

T staff has deternined that theissuance of thes eamendmen'ts will not res.ultin anyJsignificant...e'nvi.ronm.ental impact and that pursuant to 10 CFR Section 51.5nevirongatenttal impact.statem ent, or negative declaration and en6virodinent.Tl' impact appraisal need not 'be prepared.in c.onnection w th issuance df -thtsei e

endments.

l For.furfher detaiils wi.th^.respect.to lthis. at, see (1) 1etters.

re-l-ated to the amendm'ents.dated.April 20I 96,2, Y,;t 11976, Septernber Is 1978,and Sepftember.

19, 18978, (2) Amendment Nos-1

-d 4to CPPR-39 ane,

,.CPPR-64, respetively, Iei'a'id 3) t se staf fs Iel4?d of an r.e

'::+t toIncludeAntitrust Conditions in' the Diablo tCnypn Construct'on Pe1..:s.

to -c"

.un I

.cin 3

A

-Y~

7*

' All of these Itemns and. other related material a;re avii.1a.le `o,,ublc.

inspection-at the Comnission's Public Vocuwent RcPc':,

iU17 H Street, N. W.,

Washington, 0. C. and at the Local Publlic. Document Reei locat2. in San 'uis Obispo County Free Library, P. 0. Box X, Sari -Luis CI spo, Calificria 934C.'.

A copy of items (1),

(2), and (3) 1maye obtakned uponi

• r tten request to the U..

Nuclear Regulatory.- Commilsioh.,>Wash inrn, D. C. 20555, AT-T:

Di.rector,. Division of ProJect Man gemrent, Off ice of NucI ear Reac*cr

-Regua.tion.

Y('K

-Dated at Bethesda,

.Marylzand,':thfi- "day of 197p.

FOR THE I UCLEAR I'CtULATORY C0.'MISSIC:

-h

.:~ -tih itr.idr eactors Eranch to DS

S1ohn o -Proj ec t:,aa!1el i.i..;

1:

ii S

z, I

q,

S hi

'EVAToLUAION Q' A: h' 7 TO Ift, UDE

.ANTITRUST..CONtD~tf;S:a t.1. :-' JTIi P'REITS FOR THE DIABLO CANYC':

rt FAR

--!a 7?IP-L t11TI32 U

V S -1 A IND 2 The Paci:fic Gas anid Electric..

Cb

c.

O t

. :t c...tcon permts C.?5-39 and CPPR-9'for Units Il and re.,

respec&-

o4 c

!hieblo.Ccnyon

-Ce r'

Power.: P ant'.

The connstrut.-ton:.per.,it or It:1,

• t

..;-'o, w issed. on Apri1 23,

.1968.

No enendmeurs.to CPPR..39<haq

.ish' neon issued.

It was last

.di f i-ed by+an der on Octo.er 13 i

Sx exndz11 tei -latest date for

..cMpletion:.of.consryct-ion.

..The costr.*cto pXeu t.for tri.t 2..';t. ¢,"t>d on rC~eciberO g, 190.iO..The

-. l~astxrnendi~ent.:to:cPPa.^69ghas..!~t^.n, :-n.v.er 3de~td: August l4t...l9*4.

3 1:as;1asxdif'ed 1-3,E 1

extendisng tl 1e lte t date+ for c6~etin 'of~const Uitisn.1'R :...

t n

, or -.

. ;..The Di 2b.o. Canyvtn-........xu.ciear P&i:el..Piarin i~ t'o-t s~ub jec to an ant itrust.

revi~ewi underZ Section W5CS oif the: Atc!'.t Cnc rav> Act as ~e-ende.

,',ore' recent mniiklear pv

<r:lants.

e asUbzct X srrh tevie;.

HveCe er,. i n.

..connec.t~ion.wi th.the

IRSSi.procac-d~ing~ s~ t

-e -Sta ri sltaus Nucl ear *Project, Pacific Gas a~nd Elec~tric Conpny..yegce~i-to 1 ncl de antitrust co.-;ni~t::ents

... as~z..

l.-Cb........

>~icn~.

infcirr+an circ ~star.ces-which ha,

'Ilie Y.;.

Ina-letter to.te

.U..;S.: Depa>:tient o

ice (t3' dated Aprilin 30, 1isi, -

.P.G&E.s~tate'd..t~hat,, i~ntIite event,.a~ccn;.r',-;~ion pern~i-t for the Stanlsl1aus

- U>ucl~ear'-Pr'd

~ias nio.t issured b5.yti'i-.' ::c Di er. -Xo tJuy t, 1978;:..:PG!E.:as

"...wi l-ling 'to,hale i t l'i cens~e(. '-.fcr-l tht ;. rhij c:.ycn 'Nucl~ear-Povwer-:P1ant s

.Units'1:.and 2,. aInde'd to inci o'-~s7 c~"~n nttisurbst.cot :;n' nts.t

This-illngness rI s ccn tingen' ucn i

advising.the tlRC that. 'o an.

trust hearing was necessar.

ir: C

,rti-1,censinc the Stfanis1les Project. The.DOJ prosvided such *vr:--' -

1 et^.r dated ?eay 5, 19-76.-.-

.Snce.,not no-construction permi 1r Lhe.

.;.j

.isct had yot been

.,.i~ssued the aNC-afadvise--.,E, ir.

2 i.-t..er d0 c.d S-etenber 1

i

,.. 1978 of its s:intent-ion 'to incluade.:.te ;antitr'-

ct!fIitt7Ints -dS-conditiocns.n

, - :tlie Di ablo 'Canyci 'Const~ruCtiuu~iPer'ini ts.

P3

'_:'respo'nded, in...........................

a2.1etter date;!.

S ep'eber 19, 1978, st~tingttit i

n cvjection to such an r'ienene.

.. n e

~

.:rde

.rg

.,, i..

. -S.-:.t..r}

• .1

.is.U Nula Pr

.ect

'P:f-i

.r

hd El tr ezo-ic de n&ies

~l-mitivt

-w, n

a.,

co-ir-Ontn

.U

.t~

.h' I

w

.~,

. 'X,r' F.

)..... %

Based on these:,factors-, the.T:RC.sta 1 ff is a I" I request frcr.P G&E'to amend the ir S

. l N.

Nuclear: Poer P1-ant t indclude the antflltr-co5irZ

t. ad An ir, lE S

',letter ofApr.:1 30, 1975 s.ccnditions.

N..

s rev e tt4s

,matter.nd conclgdes tha't the

.ents mP. :.

From an.antitrust..sttandpontnj OJ has revi.'

t; e co iem and provided:its advice in. 4-lettfer dec;d d. id a

'tS' nt c-the constrcto-n

,erm s simply ef.ect -as

t.

.Zte Th a has been reached between P G&E and J: - For these so~ne:.i cc c

i*

tha these a-mendments should bi~ssued A

crust p

-roce ding. is ret 1S+ n p} :;ess ther enSl aasl e

.-Pr~oect :. -TheBord;i n hat.p-ceeding.vjfl'ete:.e.

ahtr tC-re is.

a need to add otitrust n

dfic to th-

-a r-. I li onse..:

As a-result ;-of' the

-JRCst'rfereview of wA Fi t

ty Anai-vy i s eor to. date, and consider'ingt:;-

e nature!- of tP--,'.rend hae i.' rled no area.of. significant.saf.ety cons ideratri 3 in cS

• ih J amendment.

The assessment of poteri ia1 *'ztr'ri~'e

-r

• ct m

c'c'*da*

-ith site pteparatt nan dthe canstructihon ct

'nd

. 2. of tn^i Dai o Canyon fNucletr Powe-r&P1anit wereO-addressed n I."

ti qrsn;intal Statement XFES) issa-inIy n

197-3.

The qtpFf ha- ;n !i-ined tiac. con-sfderfng;-tihe riatur.of the endoiheret, tfhtl its-an

.:.:.~strath'e 2:.-^

-.si-e.i t dp'TAot alteimpacts des-cribed in'the

• create.nc,-,csc not jiOuly'adddresse-d Sthta etennt, h 8-v i.:

"T

'is d eti.

r3-2

-the: statff has.cbnct i'ded',, pu'i nt". to 1-0 C',:'- a rt.c._- '

envirotnmental s tate'ntnegatd4 ve alede,

',`

o'r e:

Y, I.,rnt,7 i; -e appraisal nced not.be prepared 'in conn-ec o with tt::v isuace OT tn4s

.arendmne:

,-..z

-i

.it.:

Accordirngly, issuance of anmend.inls

'i-nsuv.ra

-i c.'1"trust.co.

ments Wtat PGZE has agreed to,as cond;iti'i is Q

r'...--'

be authorized.

i r~s I J 1

. j'l

- l1) 1 , ~ ;.

0 ~

(. i'~cr

.rt-cC Ma na3r Qe'trs Branch Dvi s i cl -of Prj9t*r g!rt

-Date.d:-..' uated:

C.0 691

I; i

I:

lo l

1XB

-t

-~

I.

NOTICES NUCLEAR REGULATORY Ioce I~.543 COMMISSION IM0WER AUThO1RIii OI

)ESAEO IDCK o ato NW YORK!JDI)AAAMOHAWK

.R e c NIEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER ITlisineomc~e

'acf r

issuance of Ae-ndnment to1cI1, cmr~

OpeUnogr Lcernse n

'NotIce Is hereby giventhat the ZIB~

otice is kh4;, %

ri'I*lt the 'U.S. szt I cldear Regulatory Camh@'34 gl t1 Owisan(h c

missio). hasm IssuedeAoendment. li.J Oommisslow baa liaised 4 dmntNo vice t6 PacMty Operating licenfte No.

toM=31YQ~~

is NO-U7nit l6 suted to the lNebraska Puli P Ig R-8i issuea to'ti P z riyof

• Distrit (the licenisee). whch*eld Csute CC vew ork akd, ~ Nisagara

]

Tecinicisl Spedflc*Alons lo teoa~

ha'Rk Voter. Coipoms1 which re- £ectt the Cooper Nuclea Stto te aflr lsed th1e Technical. ftecitcaticmi for to a located In' opik ont.Nb~eration of thke Ijaies A4 Wlrtzftaklk V-Tho amenmetis effectl'res Of Its tlclear Power PMaztt located In Om-ngo -a pe,

• of IssualiilmNe Yrk 12it 51efldrenet I-S ques' This amendment revises th ehncl ec dinWiof!nIts date of of tk

,elatoafor the facility to' prntuac.*K Inter the calibration of intermediate xie The flli:l hsnges_ the Ttehnil-be -A neutron monitora lon &any. Inendme U#

cfci2 t apecitj lowe llim-dcliv range Inonitor Indicator ag aeit tsfrhereactor ccolant'water conduc-ice r, Mien of tadlcatb& rnmge sofelOaI.J10T~yi Shoidde Ion cipi~etmlon.

I~t

.~..Te amplcation for

the am Ii~

Th opplicatlon f7crAhie mendment -

ddr

• omples withx the utn*d rdreum-~z~

Iswt the stimdards 8nd requirez niatc Inenta of the Aoi egyAto19.!pltofthe Atoul -Ebergy Act of 1954. 20551 an amended MteAt) n he Cn~

nieridd tthe' 0e.4'sadhe Commnis-ioni.

mission boa Uiade aprvlt inig abs "ade Appropriate findig a

.requied. -by. the.Ack~axd tt*:.

w the Aa-a I

th io'ulsadrgktpsIn It, cA lo"iue sd Melatkltm~a IC 1 CPR amptr wicaar st-a j~e~2sperLwhich'A te~et %o tai the amen-`Vmeniciotc ~czieamnmet.P r uI~

-tc stnce the lus~endnient 'does pot trwdnal o~

Th ~mh~o~ ~as dOrniied that resut f-

agniIezi, e

01 slgnwlcs inyloumenta Impact and: that pursuanttto 10IO'ltI~iu~Io1 CFR ye

• m~t, egaivedeclarakoto Itrf.sg mental Impact Arpriaaisl ee not OM~tagasipedntb i

preard.'Inconecio

$lh.th ha prse~~dRnconecion'!giIssuance of iets" detaft m with oetsn wit to 5Mj I45 Ih I~J1 1

iI aclc' ae.4)teapiat~

5 se Itl Mppikato womend-donnietaed3ac 0,17.

)Rei UmeI~~tc ae Jari211tiry has m 4mndnntl..6 OLkSNo

'-p 17,2) Amnmn N.l~to-LI- "al%

and 3) the Ctiaishuankla cory, o.LE't$.;!& andt)teCr-Cf ze,,wbnti

&bue aftyEAtulo.

41 f5hln tae 0~e*

aOsweg Allor h,

~ejItena reaialabtorpulic

~

bee *e~i~i~o strpblct an sit weto.a0 li a

ssPb~

Ylt eta antUIta HC~ ft-AW)NDA,. *oT 11.

os.

I S

.90" -

• jXcetlo P-44-4!

AICIFIC.GAS AND EkCMIC CO.

Ipt of Attorney G el's Adie a me, for FIing of Petiticns Tq Interne t rnust Matters ikcCotzqwon has recilved: pursu-to section 105o of the Atonge Energy of 194. as mendda. a letter of ad-

!c-the Attorney Gtneral of the e4 Stat\\.dated May 5, 1978. a copy U at ed as Appendix "A".

ky person whoe interest may be af-by fh edlnv may. pursuant eco

.1II 'Of the CommLssion's

.ei of Practice," 10 CPR Part 2. file i tion for lsihe to Intervene arid re-t a hearing On thfe antitrust aspects Le application. Petitions for leave to vene and req46ts for hearing Shall led bs June 6, 1976. edther 1) by ery to the NRCDocktlng and Serv.

Section at 1717R ULreet. N.W., Wash-D.C. ow 12) by maow telegram sed to the Secretary, Nudesa Reg-or7 Com on. Washington. D.C.

5, &FN: Docketng snd Service Se-r The NHelear RPwasory ComrnmisA Jaoxx SALTICAW.

ChiEl. Antittust and indemnity GrouP. Nuclear Reactor Reg-statton.

-APez3DJ A

NWAA-11VS Wt'AL3 p5Otc. V59U1t NOl I P~w t"- AND ftasel CoM,i

' 'tDoCtket

14. r-' 4A) h1 b&Ve Mqfted our advice purutant tU rotUons of ftcUon 10*c of the Atenak y Act at 1NK. *A amended. iij eonnec-htIU the Up*licatan.ot Pacific OaA and

,U toCpany to construct the stanIslaius ar Pritr et. Unit No. I..

Deprmnt ba prnw"ouuly Kendened ioen lItsle appikatona for sevraS m-faciltuttt witt respect to whic<r te.a an applicant. The A~ret. ct theac 0510 971 applIcation tor a l tense to ac Shet t2hen ptmpced Uendocttno Pow-at. Unlt1 a end a. On Augustt 2, S172.

epinent tnfonmd your "edee

.1ig th~a Ut e*rtat deecitbed 9onductt A.t4 fodooe the lbpmene nt alive bulk power supply sources in KM and Orntrnl Caltfornla had created atlon IeConsiatent witm the anutrupt rnd that co% Ntrution and operition ef tehdoctmo I'lant by V0W1 appeared 0o In tain such slitieompeuuie situ.

1 ting liWe recommend that an Mt t t

ld with rewpet o the duo e cation.

llubequent to the Ingt tht aUhle, I'&

ithdrew"- the oduo app~lcaton becaus ot environ-I and afty pibemt. Therefer, the ent e mnced a eomnpr el In.

a tper be antitrust las with a Io antitrust acuon In the dl.

Inetigaion Ws nerin eomoipetor u rquted our adice on o

f blion to par"~pt In th San.Tqulia rPag ct wxp.'O oemnbe S4 ftn Uithat, hn tbe perod dineo our

`f

NOTICES

• Iiii advice letter. It 'appeared that PO&Z licen.%ltagc of the uuie.

Xn thes event that of th~oI WCn criterls.: (1) its existing may havt onodifted certalq of Its antlcom-

?Odal~ applesiatofc%.ostcon n er6C 5ops4iaentie are or will be tech-petitiaw practice which were the bUsk for mWI e

h BnaViaucerPrjctUi picll Esew:*lto

- 4irt

£nterconnecuion our earzier recomznendatlfn thAt a hearing be 5 4s Viihdnawn. nr IS eatutope-whIthscEAJpUCplLtt (2) gall or pert of old. As we stated In, thM letter. 'Wbpiher init 1b ~or I lth unW~ Ss',~o mdb'te~aeI~gdroposed factilties ane or will the Se atiOns by VP&Z hIAm bee;p auel that -X~ej'ear :ItVguator]r

Miiao ro o

eRctd i te Service 'Area: (3) Its situtioa Inconssbtent with the antitrust

.ut II 01i' PM :,IMl~t ae~aP T

zef OwniuI. contractually

• lawa VLO longer existi and/qr fthther.'a =

a ti c~nse isi fr Diablo Cp~ ~cerlwrCatclfg

?oeaiggnrto ail trtnt ocee

-an# Unlted State cistic 1PlAnt. tvnu~ tsIt ie~dt o-'isi om nteSrieAe h power

• court ahou1d be iftitited are matters which pot th get nmae4s I an 4)i i.c upon. coin.-

anreur~rently. being. voisldered and which I A result Of It ft~

~Mw SaUv-Mencexnex% t.~*peeoaw

.apb will kbortl* te reeolved. we indicated that ~t~tes.' te Department bittdicatid that n. ~utility erepCted under applical tta because the Department would ihortty render-cc00213 oi :W Siassu or the rode"e Poer Act. or &aStdfw

• defnnItive antinjtrtuadv1k. 6n E'G2&2 In M s cmr to **etne y mn ati-comn.

ttegilatioh by Tit~ue at thefcthaItI nectlon with -the also~ptfldlag 1O&Z aplkgtneis necesarby wbi~ S belive tlouot cation for a jicente Po constrizct the

_WtIasil-'"ts

• laremns tocleartPyoj Umtd to Iwe L

ondO& his benc ilh #Konsclsentt with the Selphbotingvl=xtrbution "ytem.

ageeen t erai lmte ImfM 0d1

• ~~-tlan fodIr that lesson It Ss our.

WW VUIV epnil pxivste 0r Uocns pertaining, to

-TI.no hearing wouild An~'uleett hc eggo ngo at be nUcssarT;In ecbZpectiOm1with the Ilceu-NI' O C uonitos to the atnsaz!~

ett

'~eSS ngo at Ricnsear ilcesaz.

owever. to older to VZOPOMe to, IOXTSM In th* distributio et ingfSJP.

~.

~

eniproq~ced agaionwe angreftbte e~lectric power at Vetal Uad which meets each

.lloown het5 l~

fth~e SM. advice ofng the' clt~ehia rnMUzerd It). (2). and (43 in Into dlscuszIon4 auatung nt t concersuslbelcn.Wen tadht the ve-Z Cescn l aia xedtr

-which we belleved wpwposed by WO&Ehv SC:pm*i dmtintstratlye. kene]W. VPeMatto and main-tivities afteda abatv bl eiheo ha*bce0n.

enueoues jazes.. deptecatlon. &ad

• , ply mourcet In~ Kortbern'and'.Central CM' h~

cn igtaed

~teAteDp.t ot fcptlm~dn a

n a

On FvbsZt2,`U arch the aituaWion Abl $vtue on Appucnt% ih~getlnet. which

• 0 and April 30.3978. PO=' 14th au conur "esna nirs asWIch ~la vroprt llcal to th. particular serv-re ce..thee tepartu4aennt en~j*

ad tO 4i13tsca Or Li~~

determ.Insd by the tegil-aeneci loe econie tht i Pi Atorny On- )i ator7 t "yhvn urdcln sr the the iciit tgliutensOd apIcula ericortastin t ender advicse n,UWAS UtnSan ces

.ZlI~f 0

i'Coedt ptliation gn -ordei.that 411seonssiu btuen ticowitetaae P.00 ty ractice' means those

'PoaN anid the Deiparmn ih tS le C~dtih frth

.P We-are zowiabl toifrfteCti-

~*r~

ect. su~ch liie ojdx I.nanqtlst ncu-Departmen blee se tooeae labyadafy.electric Tower

.Wllonnte.

whichn the't problems Vows 4

t ~eCuiAet

~

fcite o~euiuy own ewuxtmerm w

stovae" Ivte jnwhhwill reme oy on so Par Pd 1 Cofneten nd~ur 0OMIcauy. vith due re-th~iUIncodsistent..with -Ahe an t Tow er ov O ~~

1Mo&

kP ~ Ot tn ton of natural resource.

trIMIawa~whih webeleve

• n~~a~

'a5.

and the priotection of the envuironnt of the tef~r n cnric fonaX

'-~

to'lOoo'Service An,& prvided such practseme meth-

"fCrmttis

-c Mljd~to.thewould he reqgmred 4tictlre.

attahm4 ettr it-.th.

pmeht-fr~

~

LYE.

0.7IW *Ower" means that p~wer which-to rsdn ohWonrFl3ar.

s neddt eavallable to the %u<tomer at PORietmtat n6Wt o1111 pc1nPesincrc il And tStrWhidh, In nrear-% achieve slam~

th

~

.3h1IISthat @egre at avalsablIlty, Adequate instAlled "have'thes Comt tildfd*

zdd' eenelglacinI ad0oiUWU9 teserve and auMetent tratL%-

'um~t Itslicece t

onaruct~

5tla~~mis=on to =ftve uc0pwer and reaerves to

-cau'w.

la

~ti~ltoZnttccn~tonagreemets negotiated

~ purumatI. teet Ome. conditonS &ha be

~

~~

Jubjeot 10, thb `ftZlqwJM paragraphs A

~

s~ata~n4 ii Pplies

• afl# Mt Unttaolmably refuse tmeI'~W~~al 1 peafst NWt Negbrng lity. M to tuzt~a..~

~~

~

Sale ld agreed bythe parties a

~

lion agreeMeU nt ltemennection, Max apile lower woltaliva when bseta~eararetr ha~tm the atand-poAn Of0o1'yraotlos fad ane avail-aitttnenInttconieeton greernent provisions

£re&

~*4 llaorWng it tehi.

14 ~ea an N

ese mparabla

~

tel ~ti.ifrO ee~ne~aetagremet.

ball not

~ She fac lrilea or con-

~w~m, ~

ies ple~pertee atlttactift a

ree.ta pseU~ar Warrant scilf an-toalctdon the bast I.

,fr tw

.1 "S

• 

'.'b

- a

w-a-~

'a 2*.

• 120227.

• p51 1 7 from the 1AterconnlctUo itvCOnshi-021ng a

yv ith be pmldsd erstiofl of the Vaious Usatogfor.

which sodgunent re lSsted eloh. euc the intereofnnlctlOli facilities Are to be used.

De*

wr~*~nent.

then febt~n w

or Secu~mesofa than t

,nless otherWIe agreed bythe partie.

erlc be required to

• al*Iad-betl~6 OUIflI an

&Ne liht tmm aball mat rem.snte iOt Ztte

'tmylh x

ep4b X.A uUronBto=

in fl5 fosi nrebe wt hc. now or la the gil-j* =Poepe t eaautio Upo, A oreC m oIr oxdlea ? 1 8 v len ~ 1 ft a e ture. 4 p)at bterOi n O.

til) be-the city and xcep ama efqnZdb abId orp6 en tbes.

A S~pec te-~

1~~b~o *nUt with which. no-Go dU ibtlr~

tC..

i ed peIo.c ia t 110 a l orz.

~or~

h Iuhi

t. o intir oo ect edi a nid an e epemaeouetm gvi tsal zt At or$ whih.'o I te tuturea. It Is eOcI interconnelction ag.eements, but may prid o

.iutrtBy7

.ttd-t t

on tei) end i

its ownetve adequattee Appli If po1y Of direct

=e=% with others. (2) the partie JOGnU7 eon-pait Aiphen W

~t~

ii te eoutricdey

.eldder eid Agree upo= Sm~itcaml contractual ilatyhnld nan heCfl en Oare n ukpwr upyotsideb Fpr~sovslol.

Smeasures, CE equllilmnet. which nictn eeetpriaoSiquit ateesthnlctCll agred s reai by maiy be required by Good UtIlity, Practiee.585 atltbru neyt ops Net&

W AWmt4IPlC~shl powe be) reurOd ba result of th neW Arrangement. and (2) -A.A-Ia' 0n3 Tert pieri ~ks~ub IhsP~i~ttramth power o1)fr ab pilcan t masy wr~ginot the inteco~nnection as lb*

mmsl o

h glr of Muhteglbr idoeeti aclt h orei Ap-h~c egreement. If the rel1atity of Itssse rtt~~t omiti el tor41ietc th1 bee Irel)nZLY t abbrW9e Efrom fo-service to VtA CUBICmf-would he wavemhely reefShs gett poieI si rtr 2o IyatiU borned Eutsityeo afece

-y*uhFMUv&uterconnectlof I'trq lam th=

09 eorphic' boulndarles of the, A<

,nge=Uicaflt aU of toa then elecuuicaly served at re-

.0. Agptlicant mazy include prOvWIsInS In en If anC s.0dii*S ewaxRI Wtinl tatavowemeton igeaem.3

reurn, necoxetd ihapiatr yi4Pie3ti n

othor leygbhe or Ne~bbarin Entfty 0?f Jieghbbrin Distei-bU cheue el msn~IrCS apaiysae-~~1 t~h~l phurc~im" n

Pyower or

-o it to deWVelo with AMUlcat-s 01 o-rgy: lhauccaacity an nryse a

planihst nurhe vduch MOm &""

ISCO. By~ pqa f'drlial O

.aaiae idi srsobetoo*aginn Ie v

rc ccr U*uwthin mid Zile-sbedding end tio sepWIatio Undir such Pro-mcodnewt Good Umvlt (a)tc.

viltue Of lilgbrtflsDie-interruptidnor Ctiliii"~o`

custome lceid.

ST

?Its geceduis end require-lSt hall SeL

&ugnyPwe ft.Aplcn hll aot be requiredi by puruat to these n egase eooodlitca shall. be upo with' gn shis ih uiuyPatc or It the sPMc t

h fufllqgju paragrapihs. A 1

h2eCZ7! imueinmlon ggilt LTG eaear-tbrop&tted at thedtg emotYt$e1an uin to be fulLY A. ApplIcant A d aVy Sll.

Id~

G~img t swanc eseraic twa~c nj~

oee drig pridfotwic sWmc anta o

ea uymsaait itl rnations erg 0

v n~hI~

IMPe wi =th' wi oh it a b tn 60~ntal shor ont go m re c otsos.

co d oen m

e A4lefikWi a

ta ct Cbe required by hsDc equal ctio*

A oll c.(QSa.11 August 20.

MpUo Itba seere Ice tha 111AW (to St~

pru at.~n Act.106 Ih~~~

et hog ucae of lUS is or rat 6ceue citgg~'At~

5.AI~

l

04) &ad the prowl" Wire 8lfrft eev p1etge 6

pdprheso htlr Si...

Im Augu 22 paepua shl b reue oPeob Apurahs cc Strazh 5

• . aty-W6 ~piwamc5Dom opfectartyI rs pi3o such adItna g m w M

tbJjAiS~n thir ett.

e e ui maymaca ib'7

!c~onin~ate le re1-tem+/-.~l~t or additechnial gu~le~bbe qih~SO nitllutpreide

~

~q,*i of~wbe~

1thatted en-usat" or th ~ei winhurreda do..

i ssv e11!ftl i

l nstlle t

wies is~uZ~l I~d pes.

innig

.5t L1gayrequire.A tn w itAddittionalr pet VC mix be equliwd toroei5 qif~lD#

esume I t raw ~

o~rtIcoft bes. =

luatWi"i atr¶'~~IO1 f-1eat V*jj&

nO~tl aa mfnb AO".A ImM dS*SU %,L

41. 310. 9~

ONWOT MAT 1.i975

1.

I 20228';;

NOTICIES D. 'Rate acedules and p

greementt Ior In Uordaee wth Wwe the Ung law teitioDirector. Division ot Openting mlprlon.

k tded Under thi 0 11 ond~tlt W Way at the 1IUle be appropriate ctors 1

gectioo sball be Aled by Applicant With the I Ad 0ood Uity Practice,,.d xegulatOL7 agency having jurisdiction oMerIX 1Tbese icene eondis do no t rz Dted u

B e

theda Maryland. this suCl rates and agreements.

A Applicant to become a common carrer..

29th day of Apl m976.

. LCCICS 1 2inC~gAz cN=Anojt hR Dqc.6-142O lied &-14-7628:43 a=I r he Nuclear Regulatory Conrmms-A. 2S a* elghboring Entity or Welgubrint 1,

si-On Distrlbution tstem. makes a timely requ 1est

[Docet No. 50S711 Roaua: W. Rzo.

to Applicant for ane ershp pcket U

ou 504711 i

gOperati Reactors Branch No.

In the Stanislaui RuclearProject nit o.2 VERMOT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER E DltDlon d Operating Re-or any future nuclear genertg CORP.

on.

which Applicant appties fore ORP.

to Faiiy RO.

I-43 permit duri*

the ao-r p

i

• I suane of Amendmentto Fac l0ty IFR Doc.72ililed S-14-76;8:43. amI ately tollowing the dete of thec cioa I

Operating Ucr4es*

permit for Stan'sus Unite No. 1. Applcant '

ce. Is hereby givn that the U.S.

P shall offer the requeattg party aIcopor N

Commesrioc (theCTOF

• 974 tuhy ot~s part aun reslucpr DP-8~sidt

~rtYne U

n

'PRIV~YAT.F17 amount reasonable In ligt the relative o

s Issued Amendment No.

No

$v°tems of ReoUs:

loa~ds of the Pmutcipents. WVIth respect to *2 to, Facmlty Operating License No.

Amendmns.

otn ie atanislaus Unit No 1 Oor bny Srutze auclear D 2ssued to Ven~ent Ykee NU-On Oer 1 1975. the Nuclear Reku-generating unit, a request tor participation elear Pwer e vsed latr published In the fto-shall be deemedtimely-If.eved withiu fotal pecti r bperaton of n

0o day after the mailing by 1ppucant

-teo M

Y332ce e

those ti o tec notices of Nelghborlfgi En~tltes an Negbrn JDU-tiollcatdFnarwerno.VCS~ta the R sy hich onti pesoitalne byo tribution systems of an announcement of lc.

ZerVro.Vrot hNCwaproilIfr its intent to tpntrut.

unit~ and 4, rs- ~*s~e tis effec Uve as of Its date.

i-aui.mbut in lldasand from which quest for an erpresdallno interest 1lb par-shbiomton can be retrieted by an tinplauon. Participation sabil be on ~ ait 6088

'Te~oe etModifies TechnIcal Ienifed TeotesWere which compensates Applicant for isnrofon-':

Iicion Lble

.3.l to daih and pllbshd s

• Ocument subject to pub-able abare of all its o065i. incurred and to refe the reQuirement governig CPe* r icat'In the annuh cmplaton of be incurred. inpa

g. selecting a utte for. I rI a faed tnsthn t

cmli of constructing aud opatng the faciity.

ePtalso ci doesents.

B. Any rerigtboring detity or any eg-e aiendments of the KRC Sys-boring Distribution System aking ua timely Ib-t T

tehnica l

ords

' p d

rvquest for partieipation'In manurceat ttre ellaret thea iebruar

6. 1976 must enter into a legally:.binding and ;~n-I repoC Itins from that the foitii fow-formbceab agreement to S

lc e

stentIth the F

sn thath laow-aponsIbiUty far Its harft...he Cosasso-eo.1 Issued No-I-

I r

st h

aone ue for all dae with pato lpt zInte 'nitend a* e; ouetoe ffCarstends:zu a&W with err2felghborla DSr i1973.' 2icEbse changels to the asduoetU frequWeIALY wer e nsreu Iare a Congrdesdonal otherwis.eagreed by Applicant.. a c

Nejighbori.

Ul aeithns In1m Amendment OC:

R te oln Ivdual In re-inS lntIty or Neighb rin Distbution. fys-.

i E'

o:

nur7fo h

ogesoa toin desiinlg participatiOn, inust hal saigned "u*otereue tainvda.

such an agreement.' wthin; Cone y'afe

'TeRplSo.fo Lle aaendrnent' JDD.

id atpplcant' ha provided to Vhai2tfelghbor o

e le t

oan kame na nt Is Intended to assure Ctmty or ffeiglhboring,0stribio ystcco petnntinnca ndtcnia it et-spiedd tbAct). aw the AIDins de no ae Wha unintended effect of meg on the feasibiliy f te ro ule regnulatrionsal uI.O C depink-d uaIc tt&o beneft of Con-al hnaalbe oApiatApicn

'sImde atipic4riate fidnsgreslialasit w*uhich they request.

habal provide. pdditionai etnit*t*aa rlhab'lteCmi-hsaind~twudovaetewi-they become avaliable dtiringtha' idx be h ~.

the O~ CFR aolnenl Would IndbVidatete r bcb l 'dn-a' avhiabe.;n.

z p2i

. SJon mIendm4ent w nde rtdsce od entail a didcosute of Ino thon tion aement'.ub~et tc'is.tbc~otlO

., ;lte lW rerndrent 4ocs hIOL Invole a~ *1g pertauning,tO pie: lndhtIal *Ithn as plcant qrequire provisionsrebquiin P7bJflc6hah bfi e onsldermtkn.

sytem of rbecor 1

ent -byench ppat tl s h p

lay foetswincurreddtoe U te agndevidulet e that t

n agreetm etillot it writt ou ts t

he prpos i.ant.

requiri each paricnt' ttei n or Wr rat-bechpt~ashr-ds.5Csgifcn nirne I~

I27.Nbcmet for

..retuuwW.4"t:a p

1ftlint Wil 300 Womme oW the proposed.

atcon of unit.

NO.3 AY to the N e

requIrifg emPac ruettipautito3a

____4 an or ontd-h nanclalarrangment. s in~A.

-j Jec=tty ol. tI bep

~

h ahoin 9ned eotiu t

acp~mm

~wth to thu are and a

1 ia.

g et he -

7 0 I

.. be 1.

bOSIS'

~p

~Act docu-thi~righs thy M'

'orslotRecords are bseow 1

fal Allenandat heen.-,es

1UaT, S.tree at

-C Hem MIN Or N119AL fi.il App~l icant ds..

oR.US.Iuia eg~tr

~o fromJeppjig utInp se's" aply to ruf

-fiim Id t D.C. IOS#. Aid esc sytmof reodsaotioe set forthl A;.

ItL

~

.*.N.

4.~I.MY1.17 41

-O"T t

3 EXHIBIT 3

ti I" -)

Docket lbs. W275A P-564A MUCLUARt lEGUT"OY:Sw0Uox uuctweuP.cbhsiO f

,,P.e3a N;

Pacific gas and lectric Compny ATTNI Kr. John C. Horrlssey Vice President and Lmnrml Counsetl Sa scals Street Sau Francisco. CA 94108 eZ 0Diajo Canyon Nuclear Plant.

Units I and 2 Gentlemen:

unital l

ta a letter dated i 1076 ad sed tte Assistant Atto8. y genrarl. Antitrust livision. V.

De Cpartnont of.ustice. the

-ai of the Pacific Gas nnd lectric Cony stated as follows:

Pacific Gas and flectric 5oaattl$

heratb su iting to U. S. Department of dustico the ottache4 atteent of caru1tts.

PGendE is Willing to have h pnimnsjcua scnitn in the consuction peracn s

Regulatory Cniso o osrcinadoea1n tegooe stanislauR ula rjc.Ui sifteAtre eeaai advise the uclear Reuto slon tt no ntitrust haring Is neoessary ln cnnection it a licenstog af the unit. _n th etethat PGndE' applicaton wor a constructon pemit r tbe Stanislaus Nulear Projec¶ Is withdraim. or cptuto peimt fr sch nit s fot ssu byh the Nuclear Regulaoyculso touy

1. 17 IIIsd have Its ics C

n uclear Po Plant. Unies endt. mende to r

porate the tn$st rani Go X&y 5, 1976. the Assistant Attory Leneral advised the luclar IfClator a

Conission that. I' licenses 1ssue by the l to the C r W for the Stanislaus Project wr condtioned 1nclude tbe Cc s

Statenent of Comeitaepta, an ntirust hearing Muld not be necessar.

To date a construction permit for the lansial~us NucIerPoetUi has not bean issued. Accordingly. in Icueping wth the ear "Otuoited Casppycau t-et this Is tU advise ywu thatlit is ou esent int, tion to aend onsructon Prmis CPA.'g an CpPt tefonta 4

cC: Donald A. Kaplan, DOJ 51ncerely!j j

JIerene Sait~ian, ief Antitrust and ![ndennrty Group Office g' Nulear wdactr Reultion I

.1 1tt a,

4

(

• i B

4 EXHIBIT 4

i fAG 2002 13:34 P. 02/02 PAC XCD GA.$; iXW 3L 13~C T ;RX C

-C~ 0lI9 PAN BIDcMr4 77 2EALI STREIt.. SAN FItACISGO. CALIrORNIA 9410t * (4135 781.4211 JOHM C. MORNIiEV September 19, 1978 Mr. Jerome Saltzman, Chief Antitrust and Indemnitv Group Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Dear Mr. Saltzman:

Docket Noso 50-2j75h, 50-323A, P-564A Diablo Canyon Nucloar_ PlantUnits I. and 2 In accordance,with the spirit of our letter of April 30, 1976 quoted in your letter of September 15, 1978, Pacific Gas and Electric Compa~ny has no objection to the amendment of the Construction.Permits as proposed in your letter.

Sincerely, cc:

0onald A.

Kaplan, DOJ Ene.

TnTg P. -

i

<E X

I 5

EXHIBIT 5

59934 OnTICES

'(T5D-Ol.J

'. (7S900-M]

i.;

uhe staff has determhned that the Is-4

,siaance of these amendihents will not (Docket No. 50-3201

[Docket NiDs 50-275 sn' 40-3t3

' result in any significant environmen-tal Impact and that pursuant to 10

• METROPOUTAN EDISON CO. ET AL PACIfIC GAS dI' tLECTRIC CO.

(DIABLO CFRR Section 51.5(dX4) an environ-i c.- Anm CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT,_UNITS I mental Impact statement, or pegaUve acenfte FeiltK Orerotlme AND 2)

A

• declaration and environmental Impact lsiuance of Amendment Io Construction ne ed notbe prepared In con Thc U.S. Nudest' Regulatory Corn-Pr it nection-with Issuance of these smend-mission (the.Commisslon) has Issued.

I r ments.

Ajnendment 8 to l'acilit~y Operating The U.S. ?jiclcar 1tcgolltory Corn-For further details with respect to License No. DPR-73. Islued to. the mission (Nk ) hab IssiCd Amend-' this action. see (1) letters rated to Metropolitan-Edison Company. Jeracy ments 1 and f4,: respectlvely. to Coin.

the amendments dated April 20r-1976.

Mekntroit PoEr.&-ig ComPanY, and struction Perinit-Nos. CPPR-39 and May S. 1978. September 15. 1978. and Cenntsyl Poi Er&-LeCti Company. for CPPR-69 Issutd to the.Paelic Oas.and September 19, 1978. (2) Amendment oPerationlof theThree Comiand.

Jor Electric Compthy for-Diablo Canyon *Nos. 1 and 4 to CPiR-39 and CPPR-operatSon -aof the Thre e f Island Nuclear Power Plant, Untits' 1 and 2. 1o-

69. respectively. and (3) the staff's re-Nuciear Station, Unit 2 (the facility).

cated In San y15ls Obidpo County. Cali-lated Evaluatlon of an Amendment to

• located In Dauphin County,.Pennsyl-fornia.

q i Include Antitruf t Conditions ln the vanla. The amendment Is effective as

. The amendnimenti provide: for the ad-Diablo Canyon

'struction Prinits.

of ltsdatp'of Issuance.

dition of certjIln antitrust i conditions.

All of these Items and other related.

The' license: s.aTnendcm by' revising The Dilablo Canyon Nuclear Power material are available for public in-certain.eciibical-'

Specificaions to:. Plant Is not sutbject ;oa4 antittuLt spection at the'Commnission's Public p~ernit.opebrkiati&(reduced pcs~er reviCW iunder S0$ectin d0#C of :the Document. Room, 1717 H Street. N.W.,

levels-vwith ti~uc^'-treactor coolant Atomic Energfi' ct, *s,fimehded.

More Washington, D.C. and at the Local

' ' *tehilo ';

>4 '4

recent nuclear poWer jlfnts are.sub-Public Documento6im located In San Te. appliatI6'i>fo lfme dmen"t' ject to Ouch revlew.' Howcyer. In con-Luis Obispo'County Free Librar, P.O.

donip.ies and re-nection withi the NRC's Proccedidigs Box X. sn.Lus ObIspo; Callfornia,

.t.tptherstnda=

re on can tanIsl ausNuclearProJect, Pa

.34p6

4u rme ntsthe t

Mmfc Efiergy Act: cific as and XNctrlc Cpiliany agreed A copy of 'Items (1). (2), a&ud (3) may I 9S..

I fil(d/.tthej eat anidthe i to Include antitrust comrlitments as be obtained upon written -reqyest to.

conditions In" the V)ablo Canyon I1-the UcrA Nuclear Regulatory Comiml§-

In

-eokimI1Propt 6ses Itz"certain circumstances which sion, Washinton. D.C. 2Q55S ATTKN:

lan hVe Uzr4

~

Diredtor* ptyvision. of -'PrbJeet Manage-a to the U.S. artment of mert.Offceof Nuclear Reactor Regu-

• CnDOJ)

'(ated Apil-'.0,. 1978, l1tton..

'siucin

~hat~in-the e~vent a con.

etl

~iin d

rntr-h~

tnsas Dated..'t -Bdthesda. Msai-yland. this 5 -'tt lje~t~bs ot sse~y te th day of Decemler. 1978;

. ~ ~

NR~rnrt~Tl 517. '&~ws FORV TIRE "NUCLEAR REGULA.

ti s) for he TORY COMMISSION.

A t

u D,

li.abilo 'an~

r C

nsuclar ?owerm PlanEJOHN F. Satorz.

7t- !<b; tate

~

r~it s

responde l lentdaedEcorpoatem i

Ch Light Water Rheactors

• taln' eni;jF;tE9t loir eths.1 This n

'ora fch-Noc.

Division of Proj.

f

{s.ac

n.

a

.t t hengn thendmeribt... ~8....tIn eR D

a vsnecesar lzi'cooic (FR 735565 Filed 12-21-71 4?AinJ;

.- ~ tbe~det~

W1~~

tO'~tt~w.ith micensing' thm wtithaus

s-

.Xfl.I i2

.t~ - '.: -

ctana 'Th iD OJ arqieets!

ovie tuhe. [7590t-O1--MJ icd peinat

-W lf~~prt~ini" l etter datbed'Uk

,1976.

od ostrouctiov permIt for the sket No.

d0-3 12]

&sft-

-e-N

!stff advised 2O$.'ika SACRAMENTO MUNICIFAL UTILITY DISTRICT

• ~

~

~

-~~

dated Se~~~~ptember ~'P8 fIs.hvne, mnmn

-~

tention tIssuanceh oftAmendmtentmtd~adflity Operat ing

-C

• D C Cos e

Perit The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Corn.

~4oni11 E-See res~oned,1z~

. ltterdatd Setemer ission (the Commission) has issued

~ 191918 sttlng tha i~had o obee--Amendment No6, '6 to Facility Qperat-Pezslilk'irmne~h~

tIon to uh i amendmenft;...

.Ing License No. DPR-54, issued tg._Sac-

.e' Wint H i

l ir6

.rEnyDEyWih the ramentoE Municipal HUtility Di.u2i*

f ndas audirrequjiremeftts' of the., 'which revised Technicav Specificitio'n this'AtoN gand-for operation of the Rancho Seco' u-tDas"d Isions cloa.Oenerating Station (the facility) teuo j~

• ~o lAocted-'tin Sacramento, ti#4y. Call-

-~

ra~dn~-

~tit4Iythe Act

'*fornia.

The mnd IerseP ctve as i

O osf#

~~-x n't~a~i~sQ4~iaits)

' of Its date ofr issuance.

.AA 0 wl ce st frth The 'amenidmentV ievises the -Techni-A ~ -- ~

I~cacfo

~

~

e~1t I

1 c

lfSiEcifctions to reflect plant oper-FEEA EI~R~(L42 NO. 24? FRIDlAY, DICEME~ 22.iP

.r-'

~--,'..

'~A~-'

'~V