05000346/FIN-2016001-05
From kanterella
(Redirected from 5000346/FIN-2016001-05)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Finding | |
---|---|
Title | Lack of Software Change Controls and Inadequate Corrective Action for an Operator Workaround Contributes to Complications Experienced During a Reactor Trip |
Description | A self-revealed finding of very low safety significance (Green) was identified for the licensees failure to implement a technically correct software change associated with the SG / Reactor Demand ICS control station. Specifically, a known logic error within the plants ICS would cause the SG / Reactor Demand control station to trip to manual from automatic coincident with a reactor trip. The licensee had instituted compensatory operator actions for this condition, but removed these actions in December 2015 when they implemented a software change to rectify the problem. However, the corrective actions were inadequate and the SG / Reactor Demand ICS control station unexpectedly tripped to manual from automatic when the unit tripped on January 29, 2016. The unexpected control station mode of operation change, combined with the absence of any compensatory operator actions, contributed to the SG No. 1 high level condition and the resultant SFRCS actuation. This issue was entered into the licensees CAP. Corrective actions taken by the licensee included initiating work on a new software change to rectify the issue of the SG / Reactor Demand ICS control station tripping from automatic to manual coincident with a reactor trip; reestablishing the operator workaround and associated compensatory actions for control room operators; and revising applicable procedures to incorporate current industry standards for controlling software life cycle changes to certain categories of software that interface with plant systems. This finding was of more than minor safety significance because it affected the design control and procedure quality attributes of the Mitigating Systems cornerstone of reactor safety and adversely impacted the cornerstone objective of ensuring the availability, reliability, and capability of the units MFW system and main condenser for decay heat removal. The finding was determined to be of very low safety significance because it did not represent a deficiency affecting the design or qualification of a mitigating SSC; it did not, in and of itself, represent a loss of system and/or function; it did not represent an actual loss of function of at least a single train for greater than its TS allowed outage time, or two separate safety systems being out-of-service for greater than their TS allowed outage times; and it did not represent an actual loss of function of one or more non-TS trains of equipment designated as high safety significant in accordance with the licensees maintenance rule program. The inspectors determined that the finding had a cross-cutting aspect in the area of problem identification and resolution. The inspectors assigned the cross-cutting aspect of Evaluation to the finding because the licensee had failed to thoroughly evaluate the issue of the SG / Reactor Demand ICS control station unexpectedly tripping from automatic to manual to ensure that the software change intended to resolve the issue actually addressed its cause. |
Site: | Davis Besse ![]() |
---|---|
Report | IR 05000346/2016001 Section 4OA3 |
Date counted | Mar 31, 2016 (2016Q1) |
Type: | Finding: Green |
cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
Identified by: | Self-revealing |
Inspection Procedure: | IP 71153 |
Inspectors (proximate) | D Kimble J Cameron T Briley L Alvaredo |
Violation of: | License Condition |
CCA | P.2, Evaluation |
INPO aspect | PI.2 |
' | |
Finding - Davis Besse - IR 05000346/2016001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Davis Besse) @ 2016Q1
Self-Identified List (Davis Besse)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||