3F0288-22, Forwards Final Test Results Demonstrating Conservatism in Analysis Supporting Worst Case Diesel Generator Loading & & Engineered Safeguards Loads
| ML20196F567 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 02/29/1988 |
| From: | Ken Wilson FLORIDA POWER CORP. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM) |
| References | |
| 3F0288-22, 3F288-22, NUDOCS 8803040118 | |
| Download: ML20196F567 (47) | |
Text
---
t e
rl Of*,
'9?... e,5 hb?
i Florida Power COR PO R ATIO N February 29, 1988 3F0288-22 Document Control Desk U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Subject:
Crystal River Unit 3 Docket No. 50-302 Operating License No. DPR-72 Diesel Generator Loading
Dear Sir:
On December 16, 1987 and January 7, 1988 Florida Power Corporation (FPC) responded to the NRC Confirmation of Action Letter dated November 17, 1987 with. regard to diesel generator loading issues.
In these submittals, a testing program was described which would demonstrate the conservatism in the analysis supporting the worst case diesel generator loadin4 This testing was completed during the restart from Refuel VI.
The final test results (including any adjustments necessary) are attached in
,ucordance with previous commitments.
The final test results demonstrate that the total "A"
train diesel generator load is approximately 3113 Kw when aligned as described in letter 3F0288-02 dated February 1,
1988.
It should be noted this value retains conservatism with regard to adjustments using calibration data and assumed flow rates (as discussed in the attachment).
The diesel generators were tested satisfactorily during Refuel VI to a load of 1 3248 Kw.
Therefore, this testing program demonstrates the diesel generator's capability to supply the worst case engineered safeguards loads.
8803040110 880229 p)b DR ADOCK 05000 2
Post Office Box 219
- Crystal River, Florida 32629
- Telephone (904) 795-3802 A Florida Progress Company
f f(
~ February' 29, 1988 3F0288-22:
Page 2 Subsequent' to the completion of the testing, one' configuration change has been made that affects this.
Reactor Building Fan (AHF-1A) failed 'during start up.
Reactor. Building Fan (AHF-1C) is powered from MCC 3AB.
This MCC was realigned back to the
'A' EDG to maintain separation of emergency power supplies for the two required
~
fans.
This resulted in a
30 Kw interim adjustment.
Further changes have been and will be considered as long as the 3248 Kw limit is not exceeded.
In order to assure the limit is not exceeded
'the diesel generator load configuration management program described in letter 3F0288-02 dated February 1, 1988 4.11 be utilized.
Should'you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office.
SAncerely, K.R.
- dilson, Manager Nuclear Licensing DGG/dhd Attachment xc:
Dr.
J.
Nelson Grace Regional Administrator, Region II Mr.
T.F.
Stetka Senior Resident Inspector..
r DTN. N IDAD N
'IEST IEXRIPI' ICE The objective of the "A" train emergency diesel generator (EDG) testirq was to gather data for verification of the calculated loads for larger Engineered Safeguards (EQ pmps and to verify the calculated voltacje drops during ES block loadirg of the EDG. Tests were performed on the following eight punps in addition to data gathering during the integrated ES test with a loss of offsite power
- Makeup Punp 1A (MJP-1A)
Makeup Punp 1B (MJP-1B)
Building Spray Punp 1A (BSP-1A)
Decay Heat Punp 1A (EHP-1A)
Motor Driven Emergency Feedwater Rmp (EFP-1)
Nuclear Service Closed Cycle Cooling Pung 1A (SWP-1A)
Emergency Nuclear Services Seawater Punp 2A (WP-2A)
Decay Heat Service Seawater Rmp 3A (WP-3A)
The punps tested were selected due to their large size and the method in which their electrical load was calculated, (e.g., derived frun their brake horse power curve).
The power (W) of the pmp notors was me'sured as close to the accident flows ' ' med in the EDG loading calculations as possible.
If the assumed acciden.
- x was not obtainable, additional data points were taken to enable extrapolat.sA of punp power to the accident flow rate.
Plant or test instnmentation was used to obtain data for pung flow, discharge and suction pressure, and fluid taperature.
If plant instrumentation was not within its calibration interval, it was calibrated prior to the test.
A power demand analyzer was used to measure the punp motor volts, anps, power (W), ard power factor at specific flows.
Typically pre and post calibrations were performed on the power demand analyzer prior to each test.
During surveillance testing, SP-417, "Refueling Integrated Plant Response to Engineered Safeguards Actuation," the "A" EDG ES load was measured to verify that the total ES load was 5 3248.
Also major punp flows or power readings were taken to allow for axpensation for punps operating at lower flows then assumed in the EDG calculations.
The "A" EDG voltage drops were also recorded during this test.
Visicorders (high speed x-y recorders) were used to record the EDG voltages and currents during the ES block loading.
Each visicorder channel was calibrated prior to the test.
Data gathered frcxn the testa described above was then evaluated for the verification / adjustments of the EDG loading calculations.
DRR ANAIXSIS MEDODOIIXN The methodology used in the treatment of adjustments (hereinafter referrtd to as errors) associated with electrical load measurement (W) and flow measurement (gpu) for the tested load values is presentcd below.
The analysis results were utilized to adjust the testcd load values.
a W Maamtriruz Instnanes1taticm Error TW-d.
%e testing provided observed W raadings at various flow points. Sin it was not always possible to attain the exact flow point anetmaa in the accident analysis, regression analysis was used to determine what the observed W reading would have been at the accident flow.
First order regression analysis was performed where three or less than three test points were taken.
Second order regression analysis was done where more than three test points were taken.
%e next step was to correct this observed W value at accident flow for the accuracy of the W measuring Instrument (Trade name Dranetz).
In most cases, the nultipoint calibration was performed prior to and after each test.
Each calibration point represents input at a certain voltage, current and power factor.
Enough calibration points were obtained to cover the W range of interest. Second order regression analysis was done to correct the observed W at power factors of unity, 0.866 and 0.5.
Finally, a first order regression was done to further correct this W value for the power factor observed at or near accident flow.
The more conservative corrected W value obtained frcan regression analysis performed on pre test or post test calibration data was selected as the correct W value.
It should be noted that the conservatism afforded by this approach is approximately 15 W of the total EDG load.
Flow Manarriruz Instranentaticm Error Treatmarit The treatment of accuracies associated with the flow measuring instruments during the testing is presented here for each of the punps tested since the rationale for treat e nt varied based on the system being tested.
j LEP-2A (Emergemy Nuclear Services Seawater Punp) - %e systen flow required for acronplishment of the safety function is 13,400 gpn. The system hydraulics and supplemental throttle valve setting has system flow adjusted to 14,600 gpn to account for worst case conditions of tide level, system fouling, and instrument error.
The system flow was adjusted to a recently calibrated portable Annubar which has a range of 0-20,000 gpn and a accuracy of 200 gyn.
l This inaccuracy is considered in the throttling setpoint as identified above.
The EDG load verification test used the same flow instrument for referen however, no correction for flow inaccuracy is required because real or absolute flow during the test will be the same or less during the accident, (i.e., W will be the same).
WP-3A (Decay Heat Service Seawater Punp) - The system flow required for l
acccuplishment of the safety function is 9,700 gpn.
The system hydraulics limits the ficw at 10,500 gpm which is acceptable when worst case conditions of tide, level, system fouling, and instrument error are considered.
We systen flow was verified with a recently calibmted portable Annubar which has a range of 0-20,000 gpn and a accuracy of 200 gpn.
This inaccuracy is considered in the flow verification test as identified above. The EDG load verification test used the same flow instrument for reference, hcwever, no correction for flow inaccuracy is required because the real or absolute flow during the test will be the same or less during the accident, (i.e., W will he the same).
SWP-1A (Nuclear Servims Closed Cycle Cooling Punp) - The total systs flow l
required for accx2tplishment of the safety function during the initial phase of the accident (i.e.,
no manually applied loads) is 7,535 gpn.
This flow increases by 840 gpn to 8,375 gpn when the control ocarplex chillers are manually started.
This total systs flow is based on a total of the individual certponent requirements.
The system has been flow balanced with the control conplex chillers on line to provide each cartponent with its design value plus 3% for instrument error of the various individual flow measurements at each ccarponent.
The EDG load verification test used a cmmon flow instrument with a range of 0-16,889 gpu and accuracy of i200 gpn for reference and the system was setup in the ES alignment with a control ccanplex chiller operating as described above. This load test does not require a correction for flow measurement inaccuracy because the real or absolute flow durity the test will be the same during the accident.
In addition, for conservatism the accident W was interpolated frcan the 8,400 gpm test reference to 8,500 gpn using the test data.
BSP-1A (Reactor Buildirg Spray Punp) - The normal system ficM is 1500 gpu. The systr ' has autmatic flow control which is set at 1550 gpn to cnservatively incorpo, ate instrument inaccracy. The flow instrumentation striry nas a range of 0-1800 gpn with a calib c. don tolerance of 36 gpn.
The punp load (W) determination for the accident ondition relied upon the same instrument string as the autanatic control 1 90 to monitor the system flow at 1600 gpn.
Accident flow will be controlhd to the setpoint with the same error as existed in test, which is within allowd tnlerances.
W P-1A (Iow Pressure Injection Punp) - The mini;un required system flow for core coolirq is 2700 gpn.
The system has autcmtic f1cw control with a setpoint which is adjustable frcxn the Main Control Bcani (MCB).
Procedurally, this control is set at 3000 gpu for the IPI stan'by mode in order to conservatively incorporate instrument inacruracy.
This flow control instrumentation string has a range of 0-5000 gpn with a calibration tolerance of 100 gpn which is also the range and tolerance on the MCB indicator.
The punp load (W) determination for accident conditions used the autcatutic setpoint control on the MCB indicator.
Accident flcw will not change because the autcanatic flcw control will maintain the rate with the same accuracy as used in the test, which is within the allowed tolerance.
Additionally, the analysis results used a flow of 3250 gpn.
MJP-1A (High Pressure Injection Pump) - The total required flow for the system is 500 gpn delivered to the Reactor Cbolant System (RCS) at a pressure of 600 psig.
This capability is denonstrated by system tests which take into account pressure ard flcw instrument inaccuracy (+25 psi and actual calibration data of ficw strings).
The ficw is also balanced between the four injection legs and each punp is throttled to naintain flow between 500 and 545 gpn.
The ficw instrumentation ranges are 0-500 gpn for each of four injection legs and 0-200 gpn for the normal makeup path with calibration tolerances of 10 gpn and +4 gpn, respectively.
The load (W) test used these same instruments to monitor the flow, therefore, accident flow is not affected by instrument error.
The effect of RCS pressure lcwer than 600 psig is conservatively accounted for by an extrapolation of the punp flow vs. W curve cut to a runout flcs of 600 gpn.
1
1 l
FEP-1 (Emergency Feedwater Punp) - Emergency Feedwater is not required for a j
large break IDCA because of primary to secondary uncoupling.
However, the autmatic control of EFIC will continue its designated logic of filling both steam generators (SG) to the natural cirullation level at a rate of 8 to 2 inches per minute until terminated by the operator.
'Ihis fill rate is dependent on SG pmssure which varies frcan 1050 to 800 psig, respectively. 'Ihe systs flow of mergency feedwater will vary fram 330 gpn to 82.5 gpn to each SG and aamuning shared flow with the turbine driven punp is 330 gpn to 82.5 gpn plus a recirullation flow of 100 gpn for a total of 430 gpu to 182.5 gpn. For conservatism the higher value was used for W calculations. 'Ihe load (W) test flow measurments were corrected for an offset in calibration of +8 gpn at the 25% of span (0-1000 gpo) because the EFIC control will call for a real flow to satisfy its programed fill rate.
'ITSI' RESUIIPS Puno Testirn Simmmry
'Ibe seven major punps loaded on the "A"
EDG were tested at or as near as practicable to each punp's conditions durirq a postulated large break IDCA.
'Ibe correction of these values to account for instrument error is presented below.
All other auto-connected loads (calculated values) on the "A" ED3 are presented hem for ccmpleteness.
'Ibe su; porting regression analysis is provided in Attachment 1.
MEASURED UNwHxEuw ERROR RJMP FIfW (GIM)
W CORRECI'ED W BSP-1A 1600 179.2 185.7 EEP-1A 3250 259.3 273.6 SWP-1A 8500 461.0 485.5 WP-2A 15500 521.5 537.8 W P-3A 10500 186.1 194.5 EFP-1 430 509.1 527.9 IUP-1A 600 586.6 615.5 Total Punp loads 2820.5 "OIHER" Ifam (INCIIJDING 10CM Decay Heat CL Cycle Cbolirg Water Punp DCP-1A..
74.0 control cceplex Lightiry................
32.6 Inverters 58.9 Misc AC Distribution Panels 14.7
- Misc Punps ard Small Motor Ioads............ 34.3 Reactor Bldg Fan AHF-1A 61.0 Decay Heat Closed Cycle Cooling Fan AHF-15A 2.8
- Flush Water Punp DOP-2A 8.9
- Transformer and Cable Iosses..............
5.1 *
'Ibtal "Other" Loads 292.3
'Ibtal load on "A" EDG (Punp + "Other" Loads) 3112.8 l
- Ioads not previously identified in the FSAR 1
1
MOC IDAD VERTFICATICN SIM9M (USDK; SP-417 DNIA)
In order to take into account any Motor Control Center (MCC) loads that may not have been in the fully loaded condition during 5 actuation testing, the punp loads were subtracted frcan the running EDG load identifial during the testing.
The resultant measured "other" loads (includirg MTs) were ocarpared to the calculated "other" loads arri the more conservative value was used during the load verification. The correction of the test values to account for instrument error is presented below.
The supportirg regression analysis is provided in.
MEASURED EXIFAIOLATED COKKtLTW RMP FILM W (UN00RRECTED)
W GPM BSP-1A 1570 178.1 184.6 WP-1A 2980 247.1 260.7 SWP-1A 6093 402.8 424.9 RWP-2A 14000 499.5 515.4 WP-3A 10000 183.9 192.3 EFP-1A 396.2 411.4
- MJP-1A 332.4 348.3
CAILUIATED MCC LOAM 292.3 292.3
- Did not measure flow but measured W
- Measured MCC loads during SP-417 were less than the conservatively calculated "Other" loads of 292.3 NOIIIAGE DIP ANAINSIS Upon loss of offsite power coincident with 5 actuation the auto-connected loads are applied to the Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) in load blocks at five second intervals.
At the instant each load block is applied the EDG voltage dips because of the starting inrush hVA demand of the aIplied load block.
The resulting EDG voltage profile on 4000V bue was calculated.
A&litionally, testirg was performed to validate the calculatal voltage dips.
t I
Figure 1 provides a graph of Time vs. Voltage at the EDG during Block load Tu ting.
A cxrparison of the calculated arri tested values is presented as follows:
Mininum Voltace (% of 4000V)
Calculated Testcd Load Block 1 71.1 70.6 Ioad Block 2 83.0 79.6 Icad Block 3 83.8 85.8 Load Block 4 84.8 83.1
(
Icad Block 5 85.2 80.5 l
The effect of these voltage dips was analyzed as follows:
1.
It was recognized that the Block 1 voltage dip would cause a pick up delay at the Motor Control Center ocntactor level.
This delay was conservatively a=W to be 2 6 which is the time it takes for the EDG voltage to recover to 100% level frce the 71.1% level.
The Second Isvel Undervoltage Relaying response time now takes the assumed delay into consideration and allows CR-3 to meet Technical Specification response time requirments.
2.
For Blocks 2 through 5, the worst case is the Block 2 voltage dip.
An analysis was performed and it was determined that the corresponding voltages at the Motor Control Center contactor level are 74.3% of 120VAC on a calculated values basis and 71.3% of 120VAC on a tested values basis.
Both of these values are above the contactor drop-cut level of 65%.
Therefore it was concluded that tle contactors will not drop cut during block loading.
8 FIGURE 1
EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR-1 A BLOCK LOADING VOLTAGE PROFILE 7
6 I
l l
5 VOLTAGE (Thousands)
T
\\, l D
4
\\/
n
(
V V
\\/
v v
I I
2 i
2 0
4 8
12 16 20 24 28.
TIME (SECONDS)
l-E e
M'DODENT 1 REGRESSICM ANMESIS RR RBIP 'IESIS l
1
MAKE UP PUMP 1A Pago No. 1 MAKE UP PUMP 1A TEST RESULTS FLOW FLOW MEASURED REGRESSION GPM GPM KW LINE SQUARED MEASURED KW 115 13225 372.2 372.1591 205 42025 441.2 443.1392 255 65025 477.7 476.4315 297 88209 503.9 501.0071 402 161604 545.5 548.9048 507 257049 578.6 577.4580 600 360000 N/A 586.5932 MUP-1A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING POST TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 119.5487 14291.91 126 125.4077 179.5544 32239.79 189 189.1967 240.0122 57605.87 252 253.2433 476.7566 227296.8 504 501.8863 715.8122 512387.1 756 749.4736 734.5484 539561.4 756 768.7306 956.1161 914158.1 1008 994.8265 1103.328 1217333.
1134 1143.384 1473.269 2170522.
1512 1510,850 586.5932 344091.5 N/A 616.0775 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 103.8358 10781.88 109.116 107.6791 155.9418 24317,86 163.674 163.6192 208.4412 43447.77 218.232 219.6882 414.2138 171573.1 436.464 436.6128 l
621.9556 386828.8 654.696 651.0241 633.3380 401117.0 654.696 662.6386 831.2295 690942.5 872.928 862.3544 982.044 988.5349 958.4468 918620.3 1280.273 1639099.
1300.32 1300.018 586.5932 344091.5 N/A 614.8519 i
l t
l l
l t
MAKE UP PUMP 1A Paga_No. 2 AT POWER FACTOR ~=.5 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 58.37265 3407.366-63 62.35592 88.87964 7899.590 94.5 95.57244 118.6909 14087.54 126 127.8700 231.1717 53440.38 252 248.2951 354.2445 125489.2 378 377.4578 356.1652 126853.6 378 379.4519 473.4840 224187.1 504 500.0036 545.8948 298001.1 567 573.1764 729.3174 531903.9 756 754.3165 586.5932 344091.5 N/A 613.8897 POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1
616.0775 615.7864 0.866 614.8519 615.2496 0.5 613.8897 613.7832 0.93 N/A 615.5060 CORRECT KW READING FOR MUP 1A AT RUN OUT (600 GPM) AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.93 615.5060 KW.
NOTE: THE HIGHEST FLOW MEASURED WAS 507 GPM. THE PUMP i
WAS NOT TAKEN TO RUN OUT. THE P.F. WAS 0.93 AT 507 GPM.
l l
l l
EMERGENCY FEEDWATER PUMP-1 PAGE NO. 1 EFP-1 RECORDER READINGS TEST DATA FLOWPATH FLOWPATH FLOW RECIRC TOTAL RUN POINT ONE TWO ONE+TWO GPM FLOW 2
5 0
0 0
191 191 TAKEN FROM PUMP CURVE.SEE CALC BELOW FOR KW 300 1
4 100 190 290 197 487 TAKEN FROM PUMP CURVE.SEE CALC BELOW FOR KW 600 TAKEN FROM PUMP CURVE.SEE CALC BELOW FOR KW 800 l
2 2
200 670 870 151 1021 2
1 480 440 920 117 1037 1
1 480 440 920 127 1047 1
2 870 0
870 179 1049 EFP-1 RECORDER READINGS ERR. CORR. ERR. CORR. Q 3'vRED REGR 8GPM FLOW KW LINE SQUARED 183 33489 414.9 410.3544 300 90000 471.5 459.1357 479 229441 479.4 526.7401 600 360000 585.32 567.6249 800 640000 650.36 626.6890 1013 1026169 678.1 677.9255 1029 1058841 685 681.2884 1039 1079521 676.1 683.3557 1041 1083681 676.2 683.7659 430 184900 N/A 509.0786 0300 GPM BHP =
580 INPUT TO GEAR DRIVE =
591.6 KW INPUT 993.6% EFF.=
471.5102 0600 GPM BHP =
720 INPUT TO GEAR DRIVE =
734.4 KW INPUT 093.6% EFF.=
585.3230
@800 GPM BHP =
800 INPUT TO GEAR DRIVE =
816 KW INPUT 993.6% EFF.=
650.3589 EFP-1 DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING PRE TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1,
OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW l
KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 120.7563 14582.09 126 125.8947 181.2564 32853.91 189 189.3971 241.1216 58139.65 252 252.1094 481.2792 231629.7 504 502.4531
EMERGENCY FEEDWATER PUMP-1 PAGE NO. 2 722.5086 522018.7 756 751.9229 735.3269 540705.7 756 765.1232 961.2965 924091.1 1008 996.9021 1103.870 1218529.
1134 1142.240 1468.688 2157044.
1512 1510.957 509.0786 259161.1 N/A 531.3039 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 106.1014 11257.52 109.116 108.4456 158.6360 25165.38 163.674 163.3S03 211.1430 44581.40 218.232 218.0595 423.1438 179050.7 436.464 437.2549 632.3611 399880.6 654.696 650.9064 646.5946 418084.5 654.696 665.3452 841.6529 708379.7 872.928 861.9839 965.6171 932416.4 982.044 985.7559 1285.725 1653090.
1300.32 1301.067 509.0786 259161.1 N/A 525.3316 AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 60.99855 3720.824 63 62.96261 91.51651 8375.271 94.5 94.66812 121.8335 14843.40 126 126.1032 243.1154 59105.11 252 251.2435 364.8373 133106.2 378 375.8491 371.3577 137906.5 378 382.4961 485.6079 235815.0 504 498.5021 557.7006 311029.9 567 571.2538 741.7614 550210.0 756 755.4212 509.0786 259161.1 N/A 522.2255 POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1
531.3039 529.6924 i
0.866 525.3316 527.5331 0.5 522.2255 521.6355 0.89 N/A 527.9199 CORRECT KW READING FOR EFP-1 AT 430 GPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.89 527.9199 KW
EMERGENCY FEEDWATER PUMP-1 PAGE NO. 3 EFP-1 DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING POST TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW
~KW REGRESSION VALUES 141.3971 147 149.6619 563.5934 588 581.5589 860.9807 882 885.7791 509.0786 N/A 525.7915 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 122.7548 127.302 129.6284 489.2309 509.208 503.5804 747.4952 763.812 767.1131 509.0786 523.8330 AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 68.52610 73.5 74.25983 275.1224 294 292.1362 417.3258 441 442.1039 509.0786 538.8664 POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1
525.7915 523.3043 0.866 523.8330 527.2309 0.5 538.8664 537.9557 O.89 N/A 526.5276 CORRECT KW READING FOR EFP-1 AT 430 GPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.89 526.5276 KW 4
DECAY HEAT PUMP 1A
_Pago No. 1 DECAY HEAT PUMP 1A TEST RESULTS FLOW MEASURED REGRESSION GPM KW LINE MEASURED KW 2900 243.3 243.4833 3100 252.9 252.5333 3300 261.4 261.5833 3250 N/A 259.3208 DHP-1A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING PRE TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1.
OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 119.5487 14291.91 126 125.4077 179.5544 32239.79 189 189.1967 240.0122 57605.87 252 253.2433 476.7566 227296.8 504 501.8863 715.8122 512387.1 756 749.4736 734.5484 539561.4 756 768.7306 956.1161 914158.1 1008 994.8265 1103.328 1217333.
1134 1143.384 1473.269 2170522.
1512 1510.850 259.3208 67247.29 N/A 273.6509 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 103.8358 10781.88 109.116 107.6791 155.9418 24317.86 163.674 163.6192 208.4412 43447.77 218.232 219.6882 414.2138 171573.1 436.464 436.6128 621.9556 386828.8 654.696 651.0241 633.3380 401117.0 654.696 662.6386 831.2295 690942.5 872.928 862.3544 958.4468 918620.3 982.044 988.5349 1280.273 1639099.
1300.32 1300.018 259.3208 67247.29 N/A 273.7462 AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW l
KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 58.37265 3407.366 63 62.35592 L
DECAY HEAT PUMP 1A Pago No. 2 e
88.87964 7899.590 94.5 95.57244 118.6909 14087.54 126 127.8700 231.1717 53440.38 252 248.2951 354.2445 125489.2 378 377.4578 356.1652 126853.6 378 379.4519 473.4840 224187.1 504 500.0036 545.8948 298001.1 567 573.1764 729.3174 531903.9 756 754.3165 259.3208 67247.29 N/A 278.0769 POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1
273.6509 273.1542 0.866 273.7462 274.4248 0.5 278.0769 277.8951 0.95 N/A 273.6283 CORRECT KW READING FOR DHP 1A AT 3250 GPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.95 273.6283 KW' NOTE: THE HIGHEST FLOW MEASURED WAS 3300 GPM.
THE P.F. WAS 0.95 AT 3300 GPM.
DHP-1A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING POST TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 119.6648 14319.67 126 125.3952 179.7620 32314.40 189 189.2866 239.8828 57543.78 252 252.9800 476.9049 227438.2 504 501.9151 l
716.3540 513163.1 756 749.8808 734.6307 539682.3 756 768.6623 957.0468 915938.6 1008 995.5703 1102.306 1215079.
1134 1142.116 1
1474.016 2172725.
1512 1511.192 i
259.3208 67247.29 N/A 273.5254 AT POWER FACTOR =.8,66 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES l
106.7130 11387.67 109.116 109.6080 159.1672 25334.22 163.674 163.7469 210.9378 44494.75 218.232 217.0183 424.0548 179822.5 436.464 434.6199
DECAY HEAT PUMP 1A Pago No. 3 636.7158 405407.1 654.696 649.0388 660.5383 436310.8 654.696 672.8891 843.8736 712122.8 872.928 855.2995 980.1991 960790.3 982.044 989.6295 1299.944 1689856.
1300.32 1300.319 259.3208 67247.29 N/A 266.6586 AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 61.71225 3808.402 63 64.24025 90.76085 8237.532 94.5 94.15348 120.4619 14511.07 126 124.6901 245.6265 60332.38 252 252.8371 361.8287 130920.0 378 371.0286 378.3828 143173.5 378 387.8051 483.3278 233605.7 504 493.8050 564.5784 318748.8 567 575.4520 744.0394 553594.7 756 754.4880 259.3208 67247.29 N/A 266.8049 POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1
273.5254 271.2189 0.866 266.6586 269.8096 0.5 266.8049 265.9604 0.95 N/A 270.6930 CORRECT KW READING FOR DHP 1A AT 3250 GPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.95 270.6930 KW NOTE: THE HIGHEST FLOW MEASURED WAS 3300 GPM.
THE P.F. WAS 0.95 AT 3300 GPM.
S
BUILDING SPRAY PUMP 1A Pago No. 1 a
BLDG SPRAY PUMP 1A TEST RESULTS FLOW MEASURED GPM KW 1390 172.3 1470 175.5 1550 177 1600 179.2 BSP-1A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING PRE TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 121.0001 14641.03 126 125.7067 181.7871 33046.57 189 189.4017 241.9629 58546.06 252 252.3078 482.6734 232973.6 504 502.4614 724.2380 524520.7 756 751.1250 739.1758 546380.9 756 766.4235 964.3829 930034.4 1008 995.9662 1109.355 1230669.
1134 1142.634 1477.241 2182243.
1512 1510.973 179.2 32112.64 N/A 186.6939 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 106.3224 11304.47 109.116 108.3139 158.9900 25277.84 163.674 163.4036 211.8283 44871.23 218.232 218.4473 423.9638 179745.3 436.464 437.1749 634.1252 402114.8 654.696 650.2946 649.3989 421718.9 654.696 665.6447 844.5795 713314.6 872.928 860.1481 974.8985 950427.2 982.044 988.3074 1298.292 1685562.
1300.32 1300.435 179.2 32112.64 N/A 184.4836 AT POWER FACTOR =
.5, OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 61.52895 3785.812 63 62.99828 91.75091 8418.230 94.5 94.36879 122.1720 14926.01 126 125.8517 245.3031 60173.62 252 252.3135
BUILDING SPRAY PUMP 1A Pags No. 2 a
365.6819 133723.3 378 374.4497 375.7858 141214.9 378
.384.6337 486.864 237036.5 504 495.9039 564.1346 318247.8 567 572.5639 750.9872,563981.8 756 755.4162 179.2 32112.64 N/A-184.6150 POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1
186.6939 185.9412 0.866 184.4836 185.5119 0.5 184.6150 184.3394 0.91 N/A 185.6528 CORRECT KW READING FOR BSP 1A AT 1600 GPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.91 185.6528 KW BSP-1A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING POST TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW r
KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 121.1395 14674.79 126 125.7403 181.9755 33115.10 189 189.4369 242.2035 58662.53 252 252.3555 482.9322 233223.5 504 502.4339 724.5817 525018.6 756 751.2083 738.7422 545740.0 756 765.7161 L
964.9886 931203.0 1008 996.4563 1109.537 1231072.
1134 1142.836 1476.505 2180069.
1512 1510.815 179.2 32112.64 N/A 186.5340 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 r
l OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW L
KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES i
l 106.0474 11246.05 109.116 107.5884 159.1904 25341.60 163.674 163.7010 212.0286 44956.12 218.232 219.2238
~
421.0685 177298.6 436.464 436.2665 631.9252 399329.5 654.696 650.9607 L
647.0671 418695.8 654.696 666.2144 i
l 841.4817 708091.5 872.928 860.1169 971.0316 942902.5 982.044 987.3180 i
1297.535 1683598.
1300.32 1300.779 179.2 32112.64 N/A 184.7587 l
l
BUILDING SPRAY PUMP 1A Paga No
'3 1
i AT POWER FACTOR =.5 i
OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW-SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 61.18768 3743.933 63 61.85477 92.59719 8574.241 94.5 94.93718 123.0763 15147.79 126 126.9256 242.2779 58698.61 252 250.9504 363.5277 132152.4 378 375.3427 373.2691 139329.8 378 385.2594 484,1015 234354.3 504 497.2777 556.6070 309811.4 567 569.7549 746.1270.556705.5 756 756.1970 179.2 32112.64 N/A 185.5343 POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1
186.5340 185.8476 0.866 184.7587 185.6963 0.5 185.5343 185.2830 0.91 N/A 185.7460 CORRECT KW READING FOR BSP 1A AT 1600 GPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.91 185.7460 e
O
I SWP 1A Pagn No. 1 SW PUMP 1A TEST RESULTS FLOW MEASURED GPM KW 11300 528.7 8400 458.6 8500 461.0172
- INTERPOLATED VALUE SWP-1A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING PRE TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED Kh REGRESSION VALUES 119.5487 14291.91 126 125.4077 179.5544 32239.79 189 189.1967 240.0122 57605.87 252 253.2433 476.7566 227296.8 504 501.8863 715.8122 512387.1 756 749.4736 734.5484 539561.4 756 768.7306 956.1161 914158.1 1008 994.8265 1103.328 1217333.
1134 1143.384 1473.269 2170522.
1512 1510.850 461.0172 212536.8 N/A 485.4624 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 103.8358 10781.88 109.116 107.6791 155.9418 24317.86 163.674 163.6192 208.4412 43447.77 218.232 219.6882 414.2138 171573.1 436.464 436.6128 621.9556 386828.8 654.696 651.0241 633.3380 401117.0 654.696 662.6386 831.2295 690942.5 872.928 862.3544 958.4468 918620.3 982.044 988.5349 1280.273 1639099.
1300.32 1300.018 461.0172 212536.8 N/A 485.3212 AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED-KW REGRESSION VALUES 58.37265 3407.366 63 62.35592 88.87964 7899.590 94.5 95.57244 118.6909 14087.54 126 127.8700 231.1717 53440.38 252 248.2951 354.2445 125489.2 378 377.4578 356.1652 126853.6 378 379.4519
SWP 1A Paga No. 2 473.4840 224187.1' 504 500.0036 545.8948 298001.1 567 573.1764 729.3174 531903.9 756 754.3165 461.0172 212536.8 N/A 487.3106 POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1
485.4624 485.1725 0.866 485.3212 485.7171 0.5 487.3106 487.2045 0.91 N/A 485.5383 CORRECT KW READING FOR SWP 1A AT 8500 GPM AND A. POWER FACTOR OF 0.91 485.5383 KW SWP-1A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING POST TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 119.6648 14319.67 126 125.3952 179.7620 32314.40 189 189.2866 239.8828 57543.78 252 252.9800 476.9049 227438.2 504 501.9151
- 716.3540 513163.1 756 749.8808 734.6307 539682.3 756 768.6623 957.0468 915938.6 1008 995.5703 1102.306 1215079.
1134 1142.116 1474.016 2172725.
1512 1511.192 461.0172 212536.8 N/A 485.3373 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW j
KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 106.7130 11387.67 109.116 109.6080 159.1672 25334.22 163.674 163.7469 210.9378 44494.75 218.232 217.0183 424.0548 179822.5 436.464 434.6199 t
636.7158 405407.1 654.696 649.0388 l
660.5383 436310.8 654.696 672.8891 843.8736 712122.8 872.928 855.2995 L
980.1991 960790.3 982.044 989.6295 1299.944 1689856.
1300.32 1300.319 461.0172 212536.8 N/A 472.0826
\\
l
~,,,,
,, -. ~,,
_ _. _ _ _ ~.,
SWP 1A Pcgo No. 3 4
AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT'KW KW 104 SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES j
61.71225 3808.402 63 64.24025 90.76085 8237.532 94.5 94.15348 i
120.4619 14511.07 126 124.6901 l
245.6265 60332.38 252 252.8371 l
361.8287 130920.0 378 371.0286 i
378.3828 143173.5 378 387.8051 l
483.3278 233605.7 504 493.8050 564.5784 318748.8 567 575.4520 744.0394 553594.7 756 754.4880 461.0172 212536.8 N/A 471.3214 POWER CORRECT KW CORRSCT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1
485.3373 481.0124 0.866 472.0826 477.9909 0.5 471.3214 469.7380 0.91 N/A 478.9830 CORRECT KW READING FOR SWP 1A AT 8500 uPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.91 478.9830 KW l
RWP 3A PAGE No. 1 4
RWP3A TEST DATA FLOW MEAS KW
-10500 186.1 11000 188.3 RWP-3A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING PRE TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 141.2442 147 150.0199 562.8658 588 580.7230 861.9576 882 886.2570 186.1 N/A 195.8417 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW RW REGRESSION VALUES 123.1273 127.302 130.3843 491.1563 509.208 501.8260 754.9953 763.812 768.1115 186.1 193.9409 AT POWER FACTOR =.5 l
l OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW l
KW KW REGRESSION VALUES l
71.31278 73.5 75.53951 282.4956 294 289.1439 435.4149 441 443.8165 186.1 191.6429 f
POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION
~
1 195.8417 195.4886 0.866 193.9409 194,;233 0.5 191.6429 191.5136 0.77 N/A 19'J. 6 6 01
?-ORRECT KW READING FOR RWP 3A AT 10500 GPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.77 193.660)
%W
-__...s l
- - -.., =... - -
.J
RWP 3A PAGE NO. 2 RWP-3A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING POST TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 141.2551 147 150.0051 563.3012 588 580.7573 862.6072 882 886.2375 186.1 N/A 195.7750 AT POWER FACTC R =. 3 c 6 OBSERVET' CODSFt (NFUT)
CORRECT KW P:
KW REGRESSION VALUES 1T',.0733 127.302 129.8836 445.8242 509.208 502.9842 "i49.7931 763.812 767.4540 186.1 N/A 194.0015 AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 70.19403 73.5 75.47508 279 1301 294 289.2905 430.0495 441 443.7343 186.1 N/A 194.0878 POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW l
FACTOR REGRESSION 1
195.7750 195.1734 0.866 194.0015 194.8234 0.5 194.0878 193.8675 0.77 N/A 194.5727 i
CORRECT KW READING FOR RWP 3A AT 10500 GPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.77 194.5727 KW k
RWP 2A Paga No. 1 s
RW PUMP 2A TEST RESULTS FLOW MEASURED GPM KW-17500 550.9 14600 508.3 15500 521.5206
- INTERPOLATED VALUE RWP-2A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING PRE TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 121.8516 14847.81 126 125.6482 182.8436 33431.81 189 189.2449 243.5289 59306.34 252 252.3664 485.8648 236064.6 504 502.8870 728.2035 530280.4 756 750.9407 743.1932 552336.1 756 766.2027 970.5784 942022.5 1008 996.5610 1115.256 1243818.
1134 1142.008 1486.475 2209608.
1512 1511.140 521.5206 271983.8 N/A 539.5386 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 106.2335 11285.56 109.116 108.0093 159.3721 25399.48 163.674 163.7540 211.5142 44738.27 218.232 218.2273 423.5356 179382.4 436.464 437.4218 632.6325 400223.9 654.696 649.9674 648.8432 420997.5 654.696 666.2950 842.9480 710561.3 872.928 860.1197 972.4352 945630.2 982.044 987.6948 1296.245 1680253.
1300.32 1300.680 521.5206 271983.8 N/A 537.4712 AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED,
KW REGRESSION VALUES 60.67638 3681.624 63 62.82439 91.66075 8401.693 94.5 95.11598 121.2440 14700.12 126 125.8640 242.0026 58565.27 252 250.5325 362.8901 131689.2 378 373.9751 375.7060 141155.0 378 386.9822 483.4739 233747.0 504 495.7529
=.
- q
'RWP 2A Paga No. 2 559.6166 313170.7 567 571.9528 745.2858 555450.9 756 755.4998-
.521.5206 271983.8 N/A 533.8957
. POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1
539.5386 53 9. 2 C F>
0.866 537.4712 537.6AoS 0.5 533.8957 533.8031 0.87 N/A 537.8604 CORRECT KW READING FOR RWP 2A AT 15500 GPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.87 537.860A KW RWP-2A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING POST TEST CAL DATA' AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 142.1635 147 149.8359 566.9396 588 581.1518 867.1775 882 886.0122
-521.5206 N/A 535.0336 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 123.6010 127.302 129.9957 492.3103 509.208 502.7237 754.3332 763.812 767.6025 521.5206 N/A 532.2524 AT POWER FACTOR =.5 l
OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 70.43387 73.5 75.01190 280.5371 294 290.3569 429.5925 441 443.1311 521.5206 N/A 537.3527 i
J-2 a
RWP 2A Paga No. 3
' POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1
535.0336 533.4843 0.866 532.2524 534.3690 0.5 537.3527 536.7854
~0.87 N/A 534.3426 CORRECT KW READING FOR RWP 2A AT 15500 GPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.87 534.3426 KW 9
r s
O h
r i
i I
I
4 m
RITROMNT 2 PSHSSICN MRIASIS R21)CC M mum
)
/
MCC LOADS DURING ES-ACTUATION TESTING (SP 417)
PAGE NO. 1 CXTRAPOLATION FOR SP-417 (SECOND RUN DATA)
MEASURED EXTRAPOLATED CORRECTED PUMP FLOW KW(UNCORRECTED)
KW GPM BSP 1A 1570 178.11 184.6042 DHP 1A 2980 247.10 260.6987 SWP 1A 6093 402.83 424.8864 RWP 2A 14000 499.48 515.3882 RWP 3A 10000 183.9 192.3274 EFP 1A 396.2 411.4022 MUP 1A 332.4 348.2656 TOTAL 2240.0 2337.572 EDG MEASURED KW 2418.5 2472.329 MCC LOADS DURING SP-427 178.46 134.7567 CALCULATED MCC LOADS 292.3 292.3 DID NOT MEASURE FLOW BUT MEASURED KW MEASURED MCC LOADS DURING SP-417 WERE LESS THAN THE CONSERVATIVELY CALCULATED MCC LOADS OF 292.3 KW READING USING 1 DRANETZ w/ cts AROUND 2/C PER PH.=
2386.9 KW READING USING 2 DRANETZ w/ cts AROUND 1/C PER PH.=
2418.5 DRANETZ No. ST 395 READING =
1204.4 KW DRANETZ NO.-ST 390 READING =
1214.1 KW TOTAL OF ST 390 + ST 395 READINGS =
2418.5 KW DRANETZ ST-395 ERROR CALCULATION USING POST TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQ.
KW REGRESSION VALUES l
140.2874 19680.5778 147 151.2726 562.0993 315955.727 588 579.3721 860.8979 741145.239 882 883.1767 1441.746 2078632.61 1470 1475.067 2153.890 4639242.79 2205 2203.111 1204.4 1450579.36 N/A 1232.999 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQ.
KW REGRESSIOd VALUES 121.8509 14847.6619 127.302 133.4983 488.4890 238621.552 509.208 498.8658 750.6156 563423.896 763.812 761.6213 l
1266.778 1604728.29 1273.02 1282.769 1877.800 3526133.21 1909.53 1906.116 1204.4 1450579.36 N/A 1219.524 I
1
MCC LOADS DURING ES ACTUATION TESTING (SP 417)
PAGE NO. 2
~.
AT. POWER FACTOR =.5 03 SERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQ.
KW
-REGRESSION VALUES 69.50097 4830.38508 73.5 75.91795 280.3852 78615.8973 294 288.8751 431.8713 186512.888 441 442.1521 723.1087 522886.302 735 737.5415 1080.706 1167926.55 1102.5 1101.513 1204.4 1450579.36 N/A 1227.738 POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1 1232.99987 1227.5 0.866 1219.52449 1227.0 0.5 1227.73860 1225.7 0.85 N/A 1226.9 CORRECT KW READING FOR EDG 3A ON ST-395 AT A POWER FACTOR OF 0.85 1226.972 KW DRANETZ ST-390 ERROR CALCULATION USING POST TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 i
OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQ.
KW REGRESSION VALUES 139.4151 19436.5758 147 151.02t'i 559.3776 312903.335 588 579.6068 856.8122 734127.275 882 883.6113 1433.820 2055842.51 1470 1474.458 1
2143.661 4595282.73 2205 2203.302 1214.1 1474038.81 N/A-1249.297 AT P0WER FACTOR =.566 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQ.
KW REGRESSION VALUES 121.0144 14644.4860 127.302 130.3188 487.2854 237447.134* 509.208 502.1767 746.8028 557714.506 763.812 766.3700 1245.332 1550853.20 1273.02 1275.551 1862.021 3467124.02 1909.53 1908.454 1214.1 1474038.81 N/A 1243.587 AT POWER FACTOR =,5 l
i
l MCC LOADS DURING ES ACTUATION TESTING (SP 417)
PAGE NO. 3 i
OBSERVED OBSERVED CORR 3CT(INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQ.
KW REGRESSION N' LUES 68.98392 4758.78153 73.5 75.84637 278.5839 77609.0403 294 288.8398 429.7467 184682.248 441 442.4842 719.6424 517885.192 735 737.2198 1077.904 1161878.46 1102.5 1101.609 1214.1 1474038.81 N/A 1240.176 POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1 1249.29795 1247.8 0.866 1243.58713 1245.6 0.5 1240.17693 1239.6 0.85 N/A 1245.3
\\
CORRECT KW READING FOR EDG 3A ON ST-390 l
AT A POWER FACTOR OF 0.85 1245.357 KW EFP-1 VRANETZ(ST-406) ERROR CALCS USING POST TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 141.3971 147 149.66 563.5934 588 581.55 860.9807 882 885.77 396.2 N/A 410.31 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 122.7548 127.302 129.62 489.2309 509.208 503.58 i
747.4952 763.812 767.11 l
396.2 N/A 408.65 AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED CORRECT (IN5UT)
CJRRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 68.52610
'/3.5 74.259 275.1224 294 292.13 417.3258 441 442.10 396.2 N/A 419.82
-MCC LOADS DURING ES ACTUATION TESTING (SP 417)
PAGE NO.-4 a
POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1
410.31 408.4001 0.866 408.65 411.2735 0.5 419.82 419.1219 0.86 N/A 411.4022 CORRECT KW READING FOR EFP-1 LURING SP 417 AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.86 411.4022 KW MUP-1A DRANETZ(TI-1552) ERROR CALCS USING POST TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORhECT KW KW KW REGR1'SSION VALUES 139.5615 147 150.91 556.4671 588 578.63 637.45: 0 882 887.43 332.4 N/A 348.76 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 121.2968 127.302 130.68 483.3265 509.208 501.14 744.5840 763.812 768.49 332.4 N/A 346.70 AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES I
1 l
67.70580 73.5 75.428 269.8374 294 289.39 415.5818 441 443.67 332.4 N/A 355.62
(
POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 4
MCC LOADS DURING ES ACTUATION TESTING (SP 417)
PAGE NO. 5 1
348.76 346.9881 0.866 346.70 349.1279 0.5 355.62 354.9725 0.92 N/A 348.2656 CORRECT KW READING FOR MUP-1 DURING SP 417 AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.92 348.2656 KW BLDG SPRAY PUMP 1A TEST RESULTS FLOW FLOW MEASURED REGR GPM GPM KW LINE SQUARED 1390 1932100 172.3 172.42 1470 2160900 175.5 175.08 1550 2402500 177 177.53 1600 2560000 179.2 178.94 1570 2464900 N/A 178.11 BSP-1A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING PRE TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
COXRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REG ESSION VALUES 121.0001 14641.0*15 126 125.706' 181.7871 33046.57"*
189 189.4017 241.9629 58546.0(38 252 252.3078 482.6734 232973.656 504 502.4614 724.2380 524520.721 75C 751.1250 739.1758 546380.908 756 766.4235 964.3829 930034.422 1008 993.9662 1109.355 1230669.37 1134 1142.634 1477.241 2'.82243.84 1512 1510.973 178.1102 31723.2774 N/A 1ES.5533 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES' 106.3224 11304.4727 109.11 108.3139 158.9900 25277.8496 163.67 163.4036 211.8283 44871.2366*
218.23 218.4473 423.9638 179745.311 436.46 437.1749 634.1252 402114.842 654.69 650.2946 649.3989 421718.932 654.69 665.6447 844.5795 713314.615 872.92 860,1481 974.8995 950427.227 982.04 968.3074 1298.292 1685562.25 1300.3 1300.435 178.1102 31723.2774 N/A 183.3478
. MCC LOADS DURING ES ACTUATION TES'. :NG (SP 417)
PAGE NO.'6 l
AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW 3QUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 61.52895 3785.81263 63 62.99828 91.75001 8418.23071 94.5 94.36879 122.'.120 14926.0174 126 125.8517 245.3031 60173.6280 252 252.3135 365.6819 133723.312 378 374.4497 375.7858 141214.998 378 384.6337 486.864 237036.554 504 495.9039 564.1346 318247.868 567 572.5639 750.9872 563981.830 756 755.4162 178.1102 31723.2774 N/A 183.4953 POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1
185.55 184.8002 0.866 183.34 184.3766 0.5 183.49 183.2196 0.91 N/A 184.5157 CORRECT KW READING FOR BSP 1A AT 1570 GPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.91 184.5157 KW BSP-1A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING POST TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 121.1395 14674.7955 126 125.7403 181.9755 33115.1080 189 189.4369 242.2035 58662.5354 252 252.3555 482.9322 233223.589 504 502.4339 724.5817 525018.681 756 751.2083 738.7422 545740.078 756 765.7161 964.9886 931203.075 1008 996.4563 1109.537 1231072.90 1134 1142.836 1476.505 2180069.37 1512 1510.815 178.1102'31723.2774*
N/A 185.3942 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 106.0474 11246.0555 109.11 107.5884
MCC LOADS DURING ES ACTUATION TESTING (SP 417)
PAGF NOo 7 4
159.1904 25341.6005 163.67 163.7010 212.0286 44956.1272 218.23 219.2238 421.0685 177298.687 436.46 436.2665 631.9252 399329.562 654.69 650.9607 647.0671 418695.847 654.69 666.2144 841.4817 708091.552 872.92 860.1169 971.0316 942902.556 982.04 987.3180 1297.535-1683598.11 1300.3 1300.779 178.1102 31723.2774 N/A 183.6129 AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 61.18768 3743.93300 63 61.85477 92.59719 8574.24113 94.5 94.93718 123.0763 15147.7953 126 126.9256 242.2779 58698.6131 252 250.9501 363.5277 132152.441 378 375.3427 373.2691 139329.875 378 385.2594 484.1015 234354.349 504 497.2777 556.6070 309811.432 567 569.7549 746.1270 556705.537 756 756.1970 178.1102 31723.2774 N/A 184.3999 l
l POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW i
FACTOR REGRESSION l
1 185.39 184.7044 0.866 183.61 184.5551 0.5 184.39 184.1474 0.91 N/A 184.6042 CORRECT KW READING FOR BSP 1A AT 1570 GPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.91 184.6042 DECAY HEAT PUMP 1A TEST RESULTS FLOW MEASURED REGRESSION GPM KW LINE MEASURED KW j
2900 243.3 243.4833 3100 252.9 252.5333 3300 261.4 261.5833 l
2980 N/A 247.1033
MCC LOADS DURING ES ACTUATION TESTING (SP 417)
PAGE NO. 8 i'
DHP-1A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING PRE TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 119.5487 14291.9154~
126 125.4077 179.5544 32239.7991 189 189.1967 240.0122 57605.8724 252 253.2433 476.7566 227296.887 504 501.8863 715.8122 512387.142 756 749.4736 734.5484 539561.432 756 768.7306' l
956.1161 914158.179 1008 994.8265 1103.328 1217333.73 1134 1143.384 1473.269 2170522.78 1512 1510.850 247.1033 61060.0573 N/A 260.7406 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 103.8358 10781.8810 109.11 107.6791 155.9418 24317.8685 163.67 163.6192 208.4412 43447.7738 218.23 219.6882 414.2138 171573.104 436.46 436.6128 621.9556 386828.879 654.69 651.0241 633.3380 401117.081 654.69 662.6386 831.2295 690942.581 872.92 862.3544 958.4468 918620.321 982.04 988.5349 1280.273 1639099.97 1300.3 1300.018 247.1033 61060.0573 N/A 260.7907.
AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 58.37265 3407.36677 63 62.35592 88.87964 7899.59047 94.5 95.57244 l
118.6909 14087.5407 126 127.8700 231.1717 53440.3856 252 248.2951 354.2445 125489.229 378 377.4578 356.1652 126853.658 378 379.4519 473.4840 224187.155 504 500.0036 545.8948 298001.189*
567 573.1764 729.3174 531903.922 756 754.3165 247.1033 61060.0573 N/A 265.1683 l
i POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW
)
FACTOR REGRESSION I
MCC LOADS DURING ES ACTUATION TESTING (SP 417)
PAGE NO. 9 i
1 260.74 260.2232 0.866 260.79 261.4977 0.5 265.16 264.9788 0.95 N/A 260.6987 CORRECT KW READING FOR DHP 1A AT 2980 GPM i
AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.95 260.6987 KW DHP-1A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING POST TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 119.6648 14319.6728 126 125.3952 179.7620 32314.4089 189 189.2866 239.8828 57543.7821 252 252.9800 476.9049 227438.294 504 501.9151 716.3540 513163.181 756 749.8808 734.6307 539682.356 756 768.6623 957.0468 915938.692 1008 995.5703 1102.306 1215079.81 1134 1142.116 1474.016 2172725.79 1512 1511.192 247.1033 61060.0573 N/A 260.6146 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 106.7130 11387.6786 109.11 109.6080 159.1672 25334.2271 163.67 163.7469 210.9378 44494.7586 218.23 217.0183 424.0548 179822.541 436.46 434.6199 636.7158 405407.135 654.69 649.0388 660.5383 436310.892 654.69 672.8891 843.8736 712122.801 872.92 855.2995 980.1991 960790.390 982.04 989.6295 1299.944 1689856.82 1300.3 1300.319 247.1033 61060.0573 N/A 254.1369 AT POWER FACTOR =.5
~
OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 61.71225 3808.40288 63 64.24025 90.76085 8237.53225 94.5 94.15348 120.4619 14511.0794 126 124.6901 245.6265 60332.3807 252 252.8371 l
361.8287 130920.044 378 371.0286
MCC LOADS DURING ES' ACTUATION TESTING (SP 417)
PAGE NO. 10 378.3828 143173.597 378 387.8051 483.3278 233605.771 504 493.8050 564.5784 318748.815 567 575.4520
-744.0394 55.3594.703 756 754.4880 247.1033 61060.0573 N/A 254.3439 i
POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1
260.61 258.4303 0.866 254.13 257.1208 0.5 254.34 253.5442 0.95 N/A 257.9417 CORRECT KW READING FOR DKP 1A AT 2980 GPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.95 257.9417 KW SW PUMP 1A TEST RESULTS FLOW MEASURED GPM KW 11300 528.7 8400 458.6 6093 402.834241
- STRAIGHT LINE EXTRAPOLATED VALUE SWP-1A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING PRE TEST CAL ??.!A AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 119.5487 14291.9154 126 125.4077 179.5544 32239.7991 189 189.1967 240.0122 57605.8724 252 253.2433 476.7566 227296.887 504 501.8863 715.8122 512387.142 756 749.4736 734.5484 539561.432 756 768.7306 956.1161 914158.179 1008 994.8265 1103.328 1217333.73 1134 1143.384 1473.269 2170522.78*
1512 1510.850 402.8342 162275.426 N/A 424.6172 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES
MCC LOADS DURING ES ACTUATION TESTING (SP 417)
PAGE NO. 11 103.8358 10781.8810 109.11 107.6791 155.9418 24317.8685 163.67 163.6192 208.4412 43447.7738 218.23 219.6882 414.2138 171573.104 436.46 436.6128 621.9556 386828.879 654.69 651.0241 633.3380 401117.081 654.69 662.6386 831.2295 690942.581 872.92 862.3544 958.4468 918620.321 982.04 988.5349 1280.273 1639099.97 1300.3 1300.018 402.8342 162275.426 N/A 424.7346 AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 58.37265 3407.36677 63 62.35592 88.87964 7899.59047 94.5 95.57244 118.6909 14087.5407 126 127.8700 231.1717 53440.3856 252 248.2951 354.2445 125489.229 378 377.4578 356.1652 126853.658 378 379.4519 473.4840 224187.155 504 500.0036 545.8948 298001.189 567 573.1764 729.3174 531903.922 756 754.3165 402.8342 162275.426 N/A 427.7029 POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1
424.61 424.2941 0.866 424.73 425.1760 0.5 427.70 427.5846 0.91 N/A 424.8864 l
CORRECT KW READING FOR SWP 1A AT 6093 GPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.91 424.8864 KW SWP-1A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING POST TEST CAL DATA 1
AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 119.6648 14319.6728 126 125.3952 179.7620 32314.4089 189 189.2866 239.5828 57543.7821 252 252.9800 476.9049 227438.294 504 501.9151 716.3540 513163.181 756 749.8808
MCC LOADS DURING ES ACTUATION TESTING (SP 417)
PAGE NO. 12 4
734.6307 539682.356 756 768.6623 957.0468 915938.692 1008 995.5703 1102.306 1215079.81 1134 1142.116 1474.016 2172725.79 1512 1511.192 402.8342 162275.426 N/A 424.4938 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 106.7130 11387.6786 109.11 109.6080 159.1672 25334.2271 163.67 163.7469 210.9378 44494.7586 218.23 217.0183 424.0548 179822.541 436.46 434.6199 636.7158 405407.135 654.69 649.0388 660.5383 436310.892 654.69 672.8891 843.8736 712122.801 872.92 855.2995 980.1991 960790.390 982.04 989.6295 1299.944 1689856.82 1300.3 1300.319 402.8342 162275.426 N/A 413.0749 AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 61.71225 3808.40288 63 64.24025 90.76085 8237.53225 94.5 94.15348 120.4619 14511.0794 126 124.6901 245.6265 60332.3807 252 252.8371 361.8287 130920.044 378 371.0286 378.3828 143173.597 378 387.8051 483.3278 233605.771 304 493.8050 564.5784 318748.815 567 575.4520 744.0394 553594.703 756 754.4880 402.8342 162275.426 N/A 412.5570 POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1
424.49 420.7511 0.866 413.07 418.1878 l
0.5 412.55 411.1867 O.91 N/A 419.0295
~
CORRECT KW READING FOR SWP 1A AT 6093 GPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.91 419.0295 KW RW PUMP 2A TEST RESULTS
MCC LOADS DURING ES ACTUATION TESTING (SP 417)
PAGE NO. 13 i
FLOW MEASURED GPM KW 17500 550.9 14600 508.3 14000 499.486206
- STRAIGHT LINE EXTRAPOLATED VALUE RWP-2A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING PRE TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 121.8516 14847.8167 126 125.6482 182.8436 33431.8140 189 189.2449 243.5289 59306.3406 252 252.3664 485.8648 236064.686 504 502.8870 728.2035 530280.477 756 750.9407 743.1932 552336.173 756 766.2027 970.5784 942022.589 1008 996.5610 1115.266 1243818.48 1134 1142.008 1486.475 2209608.81 1512 1511.140 499.4862 249486.470 N/A 516.8951 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPtJT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 106.2335 11285.5683 109.11 108.0093 159.3721 25399.4803 163.67 163.7540 211.5142 44738.2716 218.23 218.2273 423.5356 179382.423 436.46 437.4218 632.6325 400223.943 654.69 649.9674 648.8432 420997.505 654.69 666.2950 842.9480 710561.384 872.92 860,1197 972.4352 945630.222 982.04 987.6948 1296.245 1680253.44 1300.3 1300.680 499.4862 249486.470 N/A 515.0414 AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW SQUARED KW REGRESSION VALUES 60.67638 3681.62425 63 62.82439 91.66075 8401.69388 94.5 95.11598 121.2440 14700,1251 126 125.8640 242.0026 58565.2772 252 250.5325 362.8901 131689.254 378 373.9751 375.7060 141155.060 378 386.9822 483.4739 233747.025 504 495.7529 559.6166 313170.789 567 571.9528 745.2858 555450.923 756 755.4998
MCC LOADS DURING ES ACTUATION TESTING (SP 417)
PAGE NO. 14 a.-.
499.4862 249486.470 N/A 511.8220 POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION 1
516.89 516.6701 i
0.866 515.04 515.3487 O.5 511.82 511.7397 O.87 N/A 515.3882 CORRECT KW READING FOR RWP 2A AT 14000 GPM i
AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0,87 515.3882 KW t
t RWP-2A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING POST TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 142.1635 147 149.83 566.9396 588 581.15 867.1775 882 886.01 499.4862 N/A 512.65 J
AT POWER FACTOR =.866
.i OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 4
123.6010-127.302 129.99 492.3103 509.208 502.72 754.3332 763.812 767.60 499.4862 N/A 509.97 AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW l
KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 70.43387 73.5 75.011 l
280.5371 294 290.35 429.5925 441 443.13 499.4862 N/A 514.76 i
POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION
.MCC LOADS DURING-ES ACTUATION TESTING (SP 417)
PAGE NO. 15
-l 4.-,
I 1
512.65 511.1813 0.866 509.97 511.9976 0.5 514.76 514.2271 0.87 N/A 511.9732 CORRECT KW READING FOR RWP 2A AT 14000 GPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.87 511.9732 KW.
RWP3A TEST DATA i
FLOW MEAS KW 10500 186.1 11000 188.3 10000 183.9
- STRAIGHT LINE INTERPOLATED VALUE RWP-3A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING PRE TEST CAL DATA f
AT POWER FACTOR = 1
[
i OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 141.2442 147 150.01 562.8658 588 580.72 861.9576 882 886.25 183.9 N/A 193.59 AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 123.1273 127.302 130.38 491.1563 509.208 501.82 754.9953 763.812 768.11 183.9 191.72 AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KM KW KW REGRESSIOW VALUES 71.31278 73.5" 75.539 282.4956 294 289.14 435.4149 441 443.81 183.9 189.41
(--
I
-MCC LOADS DURING ES ACTUATION TESTING (SP 417)
PAGE No. 16 l
POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW
' FACTOR REGRESSION 1
193.59 193.2508
'0.866 191.72 192.1898 0.5 189.41 189.2919 0.77.
N/A 191.4297 CORRECT KW READING FOR RWP 3A AT 10000 GPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.77 191.4297 KW RWP-3A DRANETZ ERROR CALCULATION USING POST TEST CAL DATA AT POWER FACTOR = 1 1
OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW l
KW KW REGRESSION VALUES l
141.2551 147 150.00 563.3012 588 580.75 862.6072 882 886.23 183.9 N/A 193.52 l
AT POWER FACTOR =.866 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 123.0733 127.302 129.88 489.8242 509.208 502.98 749.7931 763.812 767.45 183.9 N/A 191.76 AT POWER FACTOR =.5 OBSERVED CORRECT (INPUT)
CORRECT KW KW KW REGRESSION VALUES 70.19403 73.5 75.475 279.1301 294 289.29 430.0495 441 443.73 183.9 N/A 191.83 POWER CORRECT KW CORRECT KW FACTOR REGRESSION
en6 MCC LOADS DURING ES ACTUATION TESTING (SP 417)
PAGE NO. 17 1
193.52 192.9320 0.866 191.76 192.5798 0.5 191.83 191.6176
~
0.77 N/A 192.3274 CORRECT KW READING FOR RWP 3A AT 10000 GPM AND A POWER FACTOR OF 0.77 192.3274 KW 4
e 4
i i
i
-.,-