The inspectors identified a non-cited violation of
10 CFR 50.54(q)(2) for failure to maintain the
emergency plan in accordance with the approved safety evaluation report. Specifically, the licensee failed to meet
10 CFR 50.47(b)(2) requirements for timely augmentation of response capabilities, in accordance with the approved safety evaluation report. Following an update to the safety evaluation report in 1993, the licensee failed to update the emergency response organization staff augmentation time requirements to commence at the time of an emergency declaration vice from the time of an emergency notification. To restore compliance, the licensee updated the
emergency plan in accordance with the current safety evaluation report. Failure to maintain the site
emergency plan in accordance with the approved safety evaluation report, dated May 20, 1993, was a performance deficiency. Specifically, the licensee failed to update the
ERO staff augmentation time requirements to commence at the time of an emergency declaration, as required by the NRC safety evaluation report. This performance deficiency is more than minor because it is associated with the procedure quality attribute of the
Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone and adversely affected the cornerstone objective to ensure that the licensee is capable of implementing adequate measures to protect the health and safety of the public in the event of a radiological emergency. This finding was evaluated using
Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix B,
Emergency Preparedness Significance Determination Process (
SDP), dated September 22, 2015, and was determined to be of very low safety significance (Green) per Table 5.2-1, Significance Examples 50.47(b)(2), because the staffing processes do not meet the threshold of routinely not capable of ensuring timely augmentation of the on shift emergency response staff to the extent that more than one required
ERO functional area (in accordance with
E-plan commitments) would not be filled. No cross-cutting aspect is assigned because the performance deficiency is not indicative of present performance.