On March 19, 2001, at 0803 hours0.00929 days <br />0.223 hours <br />0.00133 weeks <br />3.055415e-4 months <br />, with Unit 2 in Condition 5 (Refueling) at 0 percent power, it was determined that the as-found minimum pathway Secondary Containment Bypass Leakage ( SCBL) Technical Specification limit had been exceeded during regularly scheduled Local Leakage Rate Testing.
The Technical Specification SCBL limit is 9 scfh and the measured bypass leakage was 9.14 SCFH. At that time, additional SCBL pathways remained to be leak rate tested. After completion of all leak rate testing, the total SCBL was determined to be 11.13 scfh. The major contributor to the SCBL was the RHR Loop B Drywell Spray outboard isolation valve. This event was determined to be reportable in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii) in that the total as-found minimum pathway SCBL leakage rate limit exceeded the Technical Specification limit. The cause of the high leakage through the RHR Loop B Drywell Spray outboard isolation valve (HV251F016B) was due to the gland follower and stem being in contact. In addition, a small area of pitting on the disc contributed to the high leakage. The valve was reworked and successfully passed its leak rate test.
There were no safety consequences or compromise to the public health or safety as a result of the additional SCBL leakage since the dose consequences from the additional leakage would not have exceeded 10CFR100 or 10CFR50 Appendix A, GDC 19 limits. |
EVENT DESCRIPTION
On March 19, 2001, at 0803 hours0.00929 days <br />0.223 hours <br />0.00133 weeks <br />3.055415e-4 months <br />, with Unit 2 in Condition 5 (Refueling) at 0 percent power, it was determined that the as-found minimum pathway Secondary Containment Bypass Leakage (SCBL) Technical Specification limit had been exceeded during regularly scheduled Local Leakage Rate Testing.
The Technical Specification SCBL limit is 9 scfh and the measured leakage was 9.14 SCFH. At that time, additional SCBL pathways remained to be leak rate tested. After completion of all leak rate testing, the total SCBL was determined to be 11.13 scfh. The major contributor to the SCBL was the RHR (EIIS Code: BO) Loop B Drywell Spray outboard isolation valve (EIIS Code: BD) with approximately 73% of the total minimum pathway SCBL leakage.
CAUSE OF EVENT
The cause of the high leakage through the RHR Loop B Drywell Spray outboard isolation valve (HV251F016B) was due to the gland follower and stem being in contact. During valve movement, the gland follower and the stem were rubbing against each other. This rubbing caused increased friction, which reduced the force that would normally be applied to the valve disc to seat interface. In addition, a small area of pitting on the disc contributed to the high leakage.
There are no generic implications due to this failure. The high leakage experienced on HV251F016B has not been experienced on the other similar valves. In addition, the RHR Loop A Drywell Spray outboard isolation valve (HV251F016A) was repacked during this outage with no evidence of stem and gland follower contact.
REPORTABILITY/SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE
This event was determined to be reportable in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii) in that the total as- found minimum pathway leakage rate exceeded the Technical Specification limit. If a Design Basis Accident-Loss of Coolant (DBA-LOCA) with fuel failure had occurred in Unit 2, the leakage of 11.13 scfh (8.13 scfh from the RHR Loop B Drywell Spray penetration) would have bypassed secondary containment. This would have resulted in an increase in offsite dose. However, the increase in dose would not have exceeded either 10CFR100 or 10CFR50, Appendix A, GDC 19 dose limits. Therefore, there were no safety consequences or compromise to the public health or safety as a result of the increased Secondary Containment Bypass Leakage.
In accordance with the guidelines provided in NUREG-1022, Revision 2, Section 5.1.1, the required submission date for this report was determined to be May 18, 2001.
CORRECTIVE ACTION
The following corrective actions were completed on the RHR Loop B Drywell Spray outboard isolation valve:
- The gland follower was lined.
- The disc and seat were cleaned.
- The valve was satisfactorily retested.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Failed Component: � 12 inch globe valve: HV251F016B Manufacturer: � Anchor Darling Valve Co.
|
---|
|
|
| | Reporting criterion |
---|
05000263/LER-2001-010 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000529/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | 05000250/LER-2001-001 | | | 05000251/LER-2001-001 | | | 05000255/LER-2001-001 | | | 05000261/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000263/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | 05000266/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000272/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | 05000277/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vi) | 05000278/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | 05000286/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vi) | 05000287/LER-2001-001 | Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Leakage Due to Stress Corrosion Cracks Found in Nine Control Rod Drive Nozzle Penetrations | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded | 05000289/LER-2001-001 | | | 05000298/LER-2001-001 | | | 05000301/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000302/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000305/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | 05000306/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000313/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | 05000315/LER-2001-001 | | | 05000316/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown | 05000317/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000318/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor | 05000324/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000334/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | 05000338/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000339/LER-2001-001 | | | 05000341/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000352/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000353/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown | 05000354/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown | 05000361/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | 05000362/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(Iv)(A) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(Iv)(B) | 05000364/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000368/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000369/LER-2001-001 | | | 05000370/LER-2001-001 | | | 05000440/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000412/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | 05000400/LER-2001-001 | | | 05000413/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | 05000528/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | 05000483/LER-2001-001 | | | 05000397/LER-2001-001 | | | 05000395/LER-2001-001 | | | 05000443/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000388/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | 05000387/LER-2001-001 | | | 05000458/LER-2001-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation |
|