05000348/FIN-2013005-01
From kanterella
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Finding | |
|---|---|
| Title | Calculation Error Results in Significantly non-Conservative EAL Threshold Values |
| Description | A finding and associated violation of 10 CFR 50.54(q)(2) was identified by the licensee for the failure to follow and maintain the effectiveness of emergency plans which use a standard emergency classification and action level scheme. Specifically, the licensee's emergency plan emergency action level (EAL) Category R Abnormal Radiological RG1 (General Emergency) and RS1(Site Area Emergency) specified threshold values which were sixty times too high due to a calculation error. As immediate corrective action, the licensee provided the corrected threshold values to appropriate management and decision-makers (shift managers/emergency directors). The licensee entered this issue into the corrective action program as condition report (CR) 648187. The performance deficiency was determined to be more than minor because it was associated with the emergency preparedness cornerstone attribute of procedure quality. It impacted the cornerstone objective because it was associated with inappropriate EAL and emergency plan changes and their adequacy to protect the health and safety of the public in the event of a radiological emergency. Specifically, the licensees ability to declare a Site Area and General Emergency would be delayed based on effluent radiation monitor values was degraded in that event classification using these radiation monitors. The finding was assessed for significance in accordance with NRC Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix B, Emergency Preparedness Significance Determination Process, which states, FAILURE TO COMPLY means that a program is noncompliant with a REGULATORY REQUIREMENT. The inspector determined that the situation constituted a degraded standard rather than failed risk-significant planning standard (RSPS). The issue of concern was similar to the example in Table 5.4.1 (Degraded RSPS) and was determined to be of low to moderate safety significance (White). The violation was determined to meet the IMC 0305 criteria for enforcement discretion as an old design issue. A cross-cutting aspect was not assigned based on the elapsed time since the performance deficiency occurred and because the inspectors determined it was not reflective of current licensee performance. |
| Site: | Farley  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000348/2013005 Section 4OA2 |
| Date counted | Dec 31, 2013 (2013Q4) |
| Type: | Violation: White |
| cornerstone | Emergency Prep |
| Identified by: | Licensee-identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71152 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | B Bonser M Speck S Sanchezb Caballeroc Dykes F Ehrhardt J Laughlin J Sowa L Lake M Speck P Niebaum |
| Violation of: | 10 CFR 50.54 10 CFR 50.54(q) |
| INPO aspect | |
| ' | |
Finding - Farley - IR 05000348/2013005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Farley) @ 2013Q4
Self-Identified List (Farley)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||