Semantic search

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 Start dateTitleDescriptionTopic
ENS 546934 May 2020 21:40:00Diesel Generator Cooling Water System Declared Inoperable

This report is being made pursuant to 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Event or Condition that could have prevented fulfillment of a Safety Function needed to mitigate the Consequences of an Accident. A through wall leak was found on piping connected to the Division 3 Diesel Generator (DG) Cooling Water Strainer. This condition has been evaluated and the Division 3 DG Cooling Water System has been declared inoperable. The Division 3 DG Cooling Water System is a support system for the Division 3 Emergency DG and the High Pressure Core Spray System (HPCS). The NRC Resident Inspector has been notified.

  • * * RETRACTION ON MAY 8, 2020 AT 1709 EDT FROM JOE MESSINA TO BRIAN LIN * * *

This update retracts Event Notification #54693, which reported a condition that could have potentially prevented fulfillment of a safety function needed to mitigate the consequences of an accident. An evaluation of the flaw on the piping connected to the Unit 2 Division 3 Diesel Generator (DG) Cooling Water strainer concluded that the system would have remained operable. The High Pressure Core Spray system, supported by the operable DG Cooling Water system, remained operable and capable of performing its safety function. The NRC Resident Inspector has been notified. Notified R3DO (Stone).

Through Wall Leak
ENS 491671 July 2013 22:05:00High Pressure Core Spray Minimum Flow Valve Pressure Switch Setpoint Found Outside of Tolerance

This report is being made pursuant to 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Event or Condition that could have prevented fulfillment of a Safety Function needed to Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident. During routine Instrument Maintenance Surveillance Testing (LIS-HP-205), the High Pressure Core Spray System (HPCS) minimum flow valve pressure switch set point was found outside the Technical Specification allowable value. This could have prevented the High Pressure Core Spray System (HPCS), a single train safety system, from performing its design function. This is reportable as an 8 hour ENS notification. The required actions of Technical Specification (TS) 3.5.1 were entered on 7/01/13 at 1646 (CDT) when the system was made inoperable for surveillance testing. At 1705, maintenance personnel reported minimum flow valve pressure switch set point was found at 112.6 psig, which is outside of the TS Allowable Value of greater than or equal to 113.2 psig (0.6 psig below the Allowable Value). The minimum flow valve pressure switch set point has been calibrated and was left within Technical Specification allowable values, HPCS was declared OPERABLE at 1815 on 7/01/13." The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * RETRACTION FROM STEVE CHURCHILL TO JOHN SHOEMAKER AT 1346 EDT ON 8/5/2013 * * *

The event notification was reported by LaSalle Generating Station on 7/01/2013 at 2147 EDT. This update is being provided for the purposes of retracting that notification. On July 1, 2013, during surveillance testing, the Unit 2 High Pressure Core Spray System (HPCS) minimum flow valve pressure switch setpoint was found below the Technical Specification (TS) 3.3.5.1 allowable value. HPCS was declared inoperable, and TS Required Actions (RA) were entered on July 1, 2013, at 1646 hours (CDT). Because HPCS is a single train system, an ENS report was made pursuant to 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), as an event or condition that could have prevented fulfillment of a safety function needed to mitigate the consequences of an accident. The minimum flow valve pressure switch setpoint was calibrated to within TS allowable values, and HPCS was declared operable on July 1, 2013, at 1815 hours. A post-event review determined that declaring HPCS inoperable was not required. The inoperability of the pressure switch would not have impacted the function of the HPCS minimum flow valve to automatically open as required to prevent overheating of the HPCS pump. The as-found setpoint was 0.6 psig below the TS allowable value, which would have resulted in the minimum flow valve opening slightly sooner. The inoperability would also not have prevented or delayed the automatic closing of the valve at the required system flow to assure that adequate ECCS flow is available. It should be noted that the LaSalle ECCS (Emergency Core Cooling System) LOCA (Loss Of Coolant Accident) analysis assumes that the HPCS minimum flow valve is open during an injection. TS 3.3.5.1 RA D.4 requires that the minimum flow valve pressure switch be restored to operable status within 7 days. If it cannot be restored within that time, RA G.1 requires that the supported system (HPCS) be declared inoperable, precluding extended operation with the minimum flow pressure switch inoperable. The pressure switch was re-calibrated to within TS allowable values within approximately 1 hour and 29 minutes of being declared inoperable. Therefore, the HPCS system was operable with the minimum flow pressure switch 0.6 psig out of calibration for 1 hour and 29 minutes. This event did not constitute a loss of safety function of the HPCS system, and the event was not reportable under 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D). The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R3DO (Lara).

ENS 475097 December 2011 20:58:00Reactor Building Ventilation Differential Pressure Above Technical Specifications

This report is being made pursuant to 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(v)(C) and (D), event or condition that could have prevented fulfillment of a safety function needed to control the release of radioactive material and mitigate the consequences of an accident. Following initial troubleshooting of the reactor building ventilation (VR) differential pressure (DP) control loop, the Unit 1 VR DP controller was left in manual per the troubleshooting steps. It was noted at 1458 CST, on 12/7/11, that building DP was above the TS SR 3.6.4.1.1 required value of -0.25" H20. This rendered the secondary containment inoperable. Reactor building DP was returned to within the TS requirements within 14 minutes, and following system walkdowns, secondary containment was declared operable at 1615 (CST, on) 12/7/11. Troubleshooting will continue with other excursions above -0.25" H2O possible until repairs are complete (anticipated being complete week of 12/12/11). This condition requires the licensee to comply with technical specifications values within 4 hours or be in Mode 3 within 12 hours. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

* * * RETRACTION FROM R. DRAPER TO P. SNYDER ON 12/22/11 AT 1440 EST * * * 

On December 7, 2011, following initial troubleshooting of the reactor building ventilation (VR) differential pressure (DP) control loop, the building DP was above the TS SR 3.6.4.1.1 value of -0.25 inch of vacuum water gauge. The secondary containment was declared inoperable and determined to be a loss of safety function. During the investigation it was determined that the event occurred due to a failure in the non-safety reactor building ventilation differential pressure control loop. The safety related function of the secondary containment and the non-safely reactor building ventilation differential pressure control loop are completely independent from one another. It is recognized that reactor building DP may exceed the TS SR (Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement) 3.6.4.1.1 value due to non-safety related component failures such as system fan trips, pressure controller malfunctions, rapid air temperature changes due to blast heater trips, or station heat recovery coil issues. A failure of a non-safety component does not result in a loss of safety function. The safely function of the secondary containment is maintained by adequate leak tightness and the operable ventilation equipment required to maintain the negative pressure requirements of TS SR 3.6.4.1.1. The safety related Stand-By Gas Treatment (SGT) ventilation system performs the negative pressure safety function. The secondary containment isolation safety function, isolation dampers and SGT systems remained operable throughout the event. Therefore this event did not constitute a loss of safety function of secondary containment and this event is not reportable. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R3DO (Pelke).

ENS 4184414 July 2005 21:10:00Station Blackout Temperature Analysis Higher than Rcic Governor Documentation

During fact gathering in response to an NRC inspection inquiry, it was determined that documentation does not exist that demonstrates that the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) Electronic Governor Module (EGM) would be able to operate during the required Station Blackout (SBO) coping mission time at the postulated post SBO RCIC room temperature of 206.4F. Current documentation supports operation up to 150F. The EGM is a skid-mounted module that provides speed control signals for the RCIC Woodward Governor. Failure of the EGM would result in a loss of speed control for the RCIC turbine. This could result in an overspeed, underspeed or no change condition. Overspeed of the turbine would result in a mechanical overspeed trip. This device is not in the EQ program but is Augmented Quality. RCIC continues to perform its Technical Specification required functions as defined in the Bases of Technical Specification (TS) 3.5.3. The TS function is to respond to transient events by providing makeup coolant to the reactor. The RCIC Room temperatures for the postulated TS transient events is less than the currently documented component qualification temperature. The RCIC is not an ESF system and no credit is taken in the safety analysis for RCIC system operation but is retained in the TS based on its contribution to the reduction of overall plant risk per Criterion 4 of 10 CFR 50.36. The RCIC system design requirements ensure that the criteria of 10CFR50 Appendix A, GDC 33, are satisfied. Due to the lack of supporting documentation for the EGM, the beyond design basis regulatory SBO rule requirements of 10 CFR 50.63 may not be met. This condition could potentially result in an unanalyzed condition that could significantly degrade plant safety and is therefore reportable under 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii). An analysis of the RCIC Room Heat Up Rate calculation is being performed as there are conservatisms built into the calculation that when removed will result in a lower temperature than 206.4F. Additional actions in progress include, establishing appropriate protected pathways to minimize the potential for a Loss Of Off-Site Power which could result in a SBO, performance of temperature qualification testing at SBO temperatures for the EGM, and performance of an extent of condition review for remaining RCIC components to ensure temperature qualification is met for the SBO rule. In parallel with temperature qualification testing, a modification to relocate the EGM to an area outside the RCIC room that has a lower SBO profile temperature is being pursued in the event that temperature qualification is not successful. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * RETRACTION FROM D. COVEYOU TO W. GOTT AT 1427 EDT ON 8/16/05 * * *

A 8-hour notification was made on July 14, 2005, in accordance with 10 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed condition. The report was made because documentation did not support the continued operation of Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) Electronic Governor Module (EGM) during the required Station Blackout (SBO) coping mission. Since the initial report, the post SBO room heatup calculation was evaluated and determined that the decay heat removal function during the SBO coping mission was met. The decay heat removal function during SBO coping period is achieved by either High Pressure Core Spray (HPCS) or RCIC systems. In addition, the other RCIC functions (i.e., Remote Shutdown, and Safe Shutdown Fire) were evaluated and determined to be met. Since the RCIC functions and the decay heat removal and vessel inventory functions during the SBO coping mission were maintained, the plant was not in an unanalyzed condition and this issue is not reportable. Since the condition is not reportable EN 41844 is retracted. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Notified R3DO (K. O'Brien)

Safe Shutdown
Unanalyzed Condition
Mission time
ENS 4047625 January 2004 17:10:00Inoperable Refueling Interlock

This report is being made pursuant to 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(v)(A) and 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Event or Condition that could have prevented fulfillment of a Safety Function needed to Maintain Safe Shutdown and Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident. During Unit 1 refueling operations, it was discovered at 1110 hours 1/25/04 CST that the Refuel Position One-Rod-Out Interlock was inoperable. Because this interlock is credited for mitigating the 'Control Rod Removal Error During Refueling' event evaluated in the UFSAR, this is reportable as an 8 hour ENS notification. With the Unit 1 Mode Switch in REFUEL, the one-rod-out interlock function was tested per LaSalle Operating Surveillance LOS-RD-SR4. Since the acceptance criterion of this surveillance was not met, the interlock was declared inoperable and the required actions of Technical Specification 3.9.2 entered. Currently all control rod withdrawals are suspended and all control rods are fully inserted in core cells containing fuel assemblies. The Unit 1 Mode Switch is in Shutdown. Actions are in progress to restore the One-Rod-Out Interlock to an operable status. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * RETRACTION FROM BAILEY TO GOTT AT 1617 EST ON 1/26/04 * * *

During further investigation, it was determined that the system design is such that whenever the Mode Switch is placed in the REFUEL position with a rod withdrawn, no select block is received but a rod withdrawal block is generated. This design feature allows control rods to be inserted should the Mode Switch be placed in REFUEL with any rod out. The LaSalle Operating Surveillance (LOS-RD-SR4) used to demonstrate operability of the Refuel Position One-Rod-Out Block does not currently recognize this design feature and its acceptance criteria is based solely on receipt of the select block. The subject procedure will be revised to ensure all rods are fully inserted prior to performing the surveillance thereby ensuring the logic initial conditions are met to satisfactorily demonstrate the select block function. With these initial conditions satisfied, the Refuel Position One-Rod-Out Interlock was satisfactorily tested on 1/25/04 at 1935 hours CST. Therefore, the Refuel Position One-Rod-Out interlock performed as designed and was capable of performing its safety function. Thus, this occurrence was not reportable under 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(v)(A) and 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(v)(D)." The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R3DO (Louden).

Safe Shutdown