Letter Sequence Other |
---|
|
|
MONTHYEARRBG-47278, Request for Exemption to 10 CFR 50 Appendix J2012-08-23023 August 2012 Request for Exemption to 10 CFR 50 Appendix J Project stage: Request ML12271A2592012-09-27027 September 2012 Acceptance Review E-mail, Request for Exemption to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors, Related to the Definition of Pa Project stage: Acceptance Review ML13203A1262013-08-0909 August 2013 FRN, Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact - Exemption to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors, Related to the Definition of Pa. Project stage: Other ML13203A1232013-08-0909 August 2013 Letter, Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Exemption to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors, Related to the Definition of Pa. Project stage: Other ML13203A1302013-08-20020 August 2013 FRN, Exemption to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors, Related to the Definition of Pa Project stage: Other NRC-2013-0190, FRN, Exemption to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors, Related to the Definition of Pa2013-08-20020 August 2013 FRN, Exemption to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors, Related to the Definition of Pa Project stage: Other ML13203A1282013-08-21021 August 2013 Letter, Exemption to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors, Related to the Definition of Pa Project stage: Other 2013-08-20
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:Federal Register Notice
MONTHYEARML24067A0372024-03-20020 March 2024 Federal Register Notice - Issuance of Multiple Exemptions Regarding 10 CFR Part 73 - February 2024 ML20335A0902020-12-21021 December 2020 Federal Register Notice - November 2020 COVID-19 Exemptions ML20129K0532020-05-21021 May 2020 FRN: Withdrawal of an Amendment Request to Extend Implementation Date for Amendment No. 197 Associated with the Revision to the Emergency Action Level Scheme ML20161A1092020-05-21021 May 2020 FRN: Withdrawal of an Amendment Request to Extend Implementation Date for Amendment No. 197 Associated with the Revision to the Emergency Action Level Scheme ML20084H3222020-03-30030 March 2020 FRN Individual Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Renewed Facility Operating License, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing ML20084H5822020-03-30030 March 2020 Cover Letter - Individual Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Renewed Facility Operating License, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing ML19140A4562019-05-28028 May 2019 Biweekly Federal Register Notice - Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations - Publication Date: 06/04/2019 ML19085A2172019-03-29029 March 2019 Biweekly Federal Register Notice - Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations - Publication Date: 04/09/2019 ML18277A2062018-12-20020 December 2018 Federal Register Notice (FRN) for Issuance of Renewal Facility Operating License for River Bend Station, Unit 1 ML18302A3382018-11-0808 November 2018 Federal Register Notice - Notice of Availability of the Final Plant-Specific Supplement 58 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding River Bend Station, Unit 1 ML18124A0632018-05-17017 May 2018 Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Considerations and Containing Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and Order for 6/5/18 Publication NRC-2018-0102, Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Considerations and Containing Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and Order for 6/5/18 Publication2018-05-17017 May 2018 Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Considerations and Containing Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and Order for 6/5/18 Publication ML18127B7232018-05-14014 May 2018 Biweekly Federal Register Notice - Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations - Publication Date: May 22, 2018 NRC-2018-0096, Biweekly Federal Register Notice - Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations - Publication Date: May 22, 20182018-05-14014 May 2018 Biweekly Federal Register Notice - Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations - Publication Date: May 22, 2018 NRC-2017-0239, Arkansas Units 1 & 2, Grand Gulf Unit 1, River Bend Unit 1, and Waterford Unit 3 - FRN - Consideration of Approval of Direct and Indirect Transfer of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (CAC Nos. MG0258-MG0262; EPID L-2017-LLM-0010)2017-12-26026 December 2017 Arkansas Units 1 & 2, Grand Gulf Unit 1, River Bend Unit 1, and Waterford Unit 3 - FRN - Consideration of Approval of Direct and Indirect Transfer of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (CAC Nos. MG0258-MG0262; EPID L-2017-LLM-0010) ML17340B1802017-12-26026 December 2017 Arkansas Units 1 & 2, Grand Gulf Unit 1, River Bend Unit 1, and Waterford Unit 3 - FRN - Consideration of Approval of Direct and Indirect Transfer of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (CAC Nos. MG0258-MG0262; EPID L-2017-LLM-0010) ML17340B2582017-12-21021 December 2017 Arkansas 1 & 2, Grand Gulf Unit 1, River Bend Unit 1, and Waterford Unit 3 - Letter - Consideration of Approval of Direct and Indirect Transfer of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (CACs MG0258, MG0259, MG0260, MG0261, MG0262; EPID L-2017- ML17223A1142017-09-14014 September 2017 FRN Scoping Period River Bend ML17228A7372017-08-30030 August 2017 FRN River Bend Station, Unit 1 - License Renewal Application Opportunity to Request a Hearing and to Petition for Leave to Intervene Docket Id NRC-2017-0141 - Correction ML17173A1332017-08-0909 August 2017 FRN River Bend Acceptability for Docketing and Opportunity to Request a Hearing and to Petition for Leave to Intervene ML17156A0982017-06-19019 June 2017 Receipt and Availability FRN - License Renewal Application for River Bend, Unit 1 ML15218A6252015-08-14014 August 2015 Biweekly FRN - Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations - Publication Date: August 14, 2015 ML15139A1012015-08-14014 August 2015 FRN Order Approving Direct and Indirect Transfers of License and Conforming Amendment ML14295A2522014-11-13013 November 2014 and Waterford, Unit 3, Letter, Notice of Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Licenses and Conforming Amendments ML14295A1932014-11-13013 November 2014 and Waterford, Unit 3 - FRN, Notice of Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Licenses and Conforming Amendments ML14303A3812014-10-31031 October 2014 Biweekly Sholly FRN - Application and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations - Publication Date: November 12, 2014 ML14177A6452014-06-27027 June 2014 Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations NRC-2014-0037, FRN: Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations: Publication Date: March 4, 20142014-03-0404 March 2014 FRN: Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations: Publication Date: March 4, 2014 ML14051A6712014-03-0404 March 2014 FRN: Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations: Publication Date: March 4, 2014 ML13203A1302013-08-20020 August 2013 FRN, Exemption to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors, Related to the Definition of Pa NRC-2013-0190, FRN, Exemption to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors, Related to the Definition of Pa2013-08-20020 August 2013 FRN, Exemption to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors, Related to the Definition of Pa ML13228A3992013-08-12012 August 2013 Letter to Holders of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Licenses Re Rescission of Certain Security Orders Concerning Spent Nuclear Fuel in Transit - Rin 3150-AI64 (NRC-2009-0163) EA-02-109 ML13225A5572013-08-12012 August 2013 Rescission of Certain Security Orders Concerning Spent Nuclear Fuel in Transit ML13203A1262013-08-0909 August 2013 FRN, Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact - Exemption to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors, Related to the Definition of Pa. ML13203A1232013-08-0909 August 2013 Letter, Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Exemption to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors, Related to the Definition of Pa. ML13078A2682013-05-0303 May 2013 Order Approving Direct and Indirect Transfer of Facility Operating No. NPF-47 NRC-2012-0318, Order Approving Direct and Indirect Transfer of Facility Operating No. NPF-472013-05-0303 May 2013 Order Approving Direct and Indirect Transfer of Facility Operating No. NPF-47 ML13025A3212013-03-14014 March 2013 ANO 1 & 2, Big Rock, FitzPatrick, GGNS, Indian Point 1, 2 & 3, Palisades, Pilgrim, RBS, Vermont Yankee, and Waterford - Correction FRN, Biweekly Notice of Issuance of Amendments Published on 1/22/13, Revise QA Program Manual and Staff Quali ML12325A3872012-12-21021 December 2012 Letter, Notice of Consideration of Approval of Indirect and Direct Transfer for Facility Operating License and Opportunity for a Hearing ML12325A3942012-12-21021 December 2012 FRN, Notice of Consideration of Approval of Indirect and Direct Transfer for Facility Operating License and Opportunity for a Hearing ML12056A0442012-03-12012 March 2012 Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Effective Immediately) - to All Power Reactor Licensees and Holders of Construction Permits in Active or Deferred Status NRC-2012-0067, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Effective Immediately) - to All Power Reactor Licensees and Holders of Construction Permits in Active or Deferred Status2012-03-12012 March 2012 Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Effective Immediately) - to All Power Reactor Licensees and Holders of Construction Permits in Active or Deferred Status NRC-2011-0290, Biweekly Report - Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations: Fr Publication Date December 27, 20112011-12-15015 December 2011 Biweekly Report - Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations: Fr Publication Date December 27, 2011 ML11349A0052011-12-15015 December 2011 Biweekly Report - Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations: Fr Publication Date December 27, 2011 NRC-2009-0572, G20090487/EDATS: OEDO-2009-0517 - Notice of Issuance of Directors Decision Under 10 CFR 2.2062011-11-0808 November 2011 G20090487/EDATS: OEDO-2009-0517 - Notice of Issuance of Directors Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206 ML1128705662011-11-0808 November 2011 G20090487/EDATS: OEDO-2009-0517 - Notice of Issuance of Directors Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206 ML1128705332011-11-0808 November 2011 G20090487/EDATS: OEDO-2009-0517 - Letter to Sherwood Martinelli Entergy Decommissioning Funding ML1128705422011-11-0808 November 2011 G20090487/EDATS: OEDO-2009-0517 - FRN: General Notice, Final Director'S Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206 to Sherwood Martinelli NRC-2011-0187, Biweekly Sholly Report - Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations; Fr Publication Date: 8/23/20112011-08-11011 August 2011 Biweekly Sholly Report - Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations; Fr Publication Date: 8/23/2011 ML1122302752011-08-11011 August 2011 Biweekly Sholly Report - Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations; Fr Publication Date: 8/23/2011 2024-03-20
[Table view] |
Text
[7590-01-P]
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-458; NRC-2013-0190]
Entergy Operations, Inc., River Bend Station, Unit 1; Exemption
1.0 BACKGROUND
Entergy Operations Inc. (Entergy, the licensee) is the holder of Facility Operating License No. NPF-47, which authorizes operation of the River Bend Station, Unit 1 (RBS). The license provides, among other things, that the facility is subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of a boiling-water reactor located in West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana.
2.0 REQUEST/ACTION Part 50 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), appendix J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors, requires that components which penetrate containment be periodically leak tested at the Pa, defined as the calculated peak containment internal pressure related to the design basis accident specified either in the technical specification or associated bases. In October 2011, Entergy was contacted by the NRC concerning the stations use of the appendix J definition of Pa. The NRC noted a conflict between Entergys interpretation of that definition of Pa and the literal reading of the definition of Pa in the regulations. Entergy stated it was defining Pa based on the long-term calculated pressure peak for the containment as a whole and not on the short-term localized pressure spike in wetwell.
By letter dated August 23, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12241A250), Entergy submitted a request for an exemption from the definition of the Pa as stated in 10 CFR part 50, appendix J, and substitute an alternate definition. The value of Pa is determined by calculating the pressure response in containment over time after a main steam line break. The original containment analysis for RBS had determined Pa to be 7.6 pounds per square inch gauge (psig). In July 1999, RBS submitted a license amendment request to increase the licensed thermal power of the station by 5 percent from 2,894 megawatts thermal (MWth) to 3,039 MWth. As part of the extended power uprate review, new calculations were performed and determined that a localized pressure spike in the wetwell occurs within a few seconds of the accident and with a pressure peak at 9.3 psig.
However, the localized pressure in the wetwell quickly drops by several psig as the pressure equalizes throughout containment. This calculation also determined that the long-term peak containment pressure is 3.6 psig. To avoid a large number of procedure changes, which would be required if the value was changed, RBS elected to maintain Pa at the original (pre-extended power uprate) value of 7.6 psig, which is conservative to the calculated long-term peak value of 3.6 psig. The exemption would allow Entergy to continue to use the previously calculated value of 7.6 psig for Pa for RBS instead of the localized pressure spike in the wetwell calculated value of 9.3 psig.
The NRC staff has concluded that the use of the alternate definition for Pa meets the intent of 10 CFR part 50, appendix J because it provides testing of the primary containment parameters at a pressure that would exist throughout containment over the long term following a design basis accident.
3.0 DISCUSSION Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the Commission may, upon application by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR part 50 when 1) the exemptions are authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to public health or safety, and are consistent with the common defense and security; and 2) when special circumstances are present. The staff accepts the licensees determination that an exemption would be required to continue to use the alternate definition of Pa from that defined in 10 CFR part 50, appendix J.
The NRC staff examined the licensees rationale to support the exemption request and concluded that the use the value of 7.6 psig for Pa would meet the underlying purpose of 10 CFR part 50, appendix J. Supporting the use of this alternate value is:
- 1) the time for the pressure spike to occur and fall to equilibrium is 6 seconds, which is not sufficient time to release source terms from the core,
- 2) the pressure spike is also localized to the wetwell area which makes up roughly 10 percent of containment,
- 3) the number of containment penetrations in this area is limited. Therefore, the current Pa value of 7.6 psig meets the intent of 10 CFR part 50, appendix J by bounding the peak bulk containment pressure (3.6 psig) and assuring that leakage through the primary containment does not exceed allowable leakage rate values,
- 4) the calculated peak bulk containment pressure is 3.6 psig so the Technical Specification (TS) value of 7.6 is conservative for the use of determining containment leakage, and
- 5) this request is consistent with the determination that the NRC staff has reached for other licensees under similar conditions based on the same considerations.
The application for exemption may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRCs Public Document Room, located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland 20852. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically from the ADAMS Public Library component on the NRCs Web site, http://www.nrc.gov (the Electronic Reading Room).
Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that requesting exemption under the special circumstances of 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii) is appropriate and that the alternate definition of Pa may be used for the appendix J testing.
Authorized by Law This exemption would allow Entergy to use a Pa value of 7.6 psig for appendix J testing at the RBS as discussed above. As stated above, 10 CFR 50.12 allows the NRC to grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR part 50, appendix J. The NRC staff has determined that granting of the licensees proposed exemption is in accordance with the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or the Commissions regulations. Therefore, the exemption is authorized by law.
No Undue Risk to Public Health and Safety The underlying purposes of 10 CFR part 50, appendix J are stated in section (I)
Introduction. The purpose is to conduct tests to assure that a) leakage through the primary
reactor containment does not exceed allowable leakage rate values and b) to conduct periodic surveillance of reactor containment penetrations to support proper maintenance. No new accident precursors are created because the testing is conducted at a Pa value calculated to be representative of peak conditions throughout containment during a design basis accident. No new accident precursors are created by use of a Pa of 7.6 psig instead of 9.3 psig, thus, the probability of postulated accidents is not increased. Therefore, there is no undue risk to public health and safety.
Consistent with Common Defense and Security The exemption would permit exclusion of the short duration spike in wetwell pressure as Pa for Appendix J testing purposes. This change to the interpretation of Pa as defined in Appendix J has no relation to security issues. Therefore, the common defense and security is not impacted by this exemption.
4.0 CONCLUSION
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a), the exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to the public health and safety, and is consistent with the common defense and security. Also, special circumstances are present. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants Entergy Operations, Inc., an exemption from the definition for Pa in 10 CFR part 50, appendix J for River Bend Station, Unit 1 and alternatively to continue to use a Pa value of 7.6 psig.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the granting of this exemption will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment (78 FR 50454; August 19, 2013).
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day of August 2013.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
/ra/
Michele G. Evans, Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.