|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML15154A5052015-05-18018 May 2015
Comment (1) of Heinz J. Mueller on Behalf of Us EPA on Final Generic Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Fgseis)/ License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53 Regarding Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Ceq 20150079
ML13130A2442013-05-0101 May 2013
Comment (1) of Kristina Lambert, of the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, Opposing the Relicensing of the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant
ML13130A2382013-05-0101 May 2013
Comment (13) of Yolanda Moyer on License Renewal Application for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Tennessee Valley Authority
ML13130A2392013-04-30030 April 2013
Comment (14) of Judith Canepa of the New York Climate Action Group Opposing the License Renewal Application for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Tennessee Valley Authority
ML13144A8282013-04-26026 April 2013
Comment (2) of Tom Clements on Behalf of Friends of the Earth, on the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 2 License Renewal Application Review
ML13149A0082013-04-26026 April 2013
Comment (15) of Tom Clements on Behalf of Friends of the Earth on Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application Review
ML13119A2032013-04-25025 April 2013
Comment (11) of Sandra Kurtz on the Scoping Regarding the Re-licensing for Sequoyah Nuclear Reactors 1 and 2
ML13116A2962013-04-19019 April 2013
Comment (6) of Eric Blevins on the License Renewal Application for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Tennessee Valley Authority
ML13116A2942013-04-19019 April 2013
Comment (7) of Tara Pilkinton Opposing the License Renewal Application for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Tennessee Valley Authority
ML13116A2932013-04-17017 April 2013
Comment (4) of Jeannie Hacker-Cerulean Opposing the License Renewal Application for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Tennessee Valley Authority
ML13116A2952013-04-17017 April 2013
Comment (5) of Sylvia D. Aldrich Opposing the License Renewal Application for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Tennessee Valley Authority
ML13116A2922013-04-16016 April 2013
Comment (3) of Adelle Wood, Opposing the Application for Renewal of Sequoyah Nuclear Plant
ML13101A1172013-04-0404 April 2013
Comment (2) of David Lockbaum on Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Sequoyah Nuclear Plant
ML13091A0182013-03-16016 March 2013
Comment (1) of Jaak Saame Regarding Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Sequoyah Nuclear Plant
ML13119A1132013-03-0808 March 2013
Comment (10) of Gretel Johnston on the License Renewal Application for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Tennessee Valley Authority
ML13119A1112013-03-0808 March 2013
Comment (8) of Brian Paddok on Application for Renewal of Sequoyah Nuclear Plant
ML11308A0302011-11-0101 November 2011
Comment (2) of Tom Clements on Behalf of Friends of the Earth, on Draft Strategic Plan About Testing of Plutonium Fuel (MOX) Made from Weapons-Grade Plutonium Required for NRC to License MOX Use in Boiling Water Reactors
ML0927401602009-09-24024 September 2009
Comment (1) of Don C. Laster Opposing on Site Disposal of Contaminated Materials at the Sequoyah Fuels Site Located 2 Miles East of Gore Oklahoma
ML0720803462007-07-23023 July 2007
Comment (3) of Beth A. Wetzel on Behalf of Tennessee Valley Authority Regarding Proposed Generic Communication Concerning Managing Gas Intrusion
ML0636204352006-12-22022 December 2006
Comment (46) of Beth A. Wetzel, on Behalf of TVA Re Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1172, Application and Testing of Safety-Related Diesel Generators in Nuclear Power Plants, Enclosed Comments Should Be Considered ESI-EMD Owners Group and Tva'S C
ML0616001982006-06-20020 June 2006
Order EA-06-137, Attachment 1-E; List of Licensees
ML0604100502006-02-0202 February 2006
Comment (8) of Glenn W. Morris on Behalf of Tennessee Valley Authority Re Proposed Generic Communication; Post-Fire Safe-Shutdown Circuit Analysis Spurious Actuations.
ML0415403832004-05-28028 May 2004
Comment (3) of Mark J. Burzynski on Proposed Generic Letter (GL) 2004-XX; Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors (PWR)
ML0408302472004-03-17017 March 2004
Comment (2) of Mark J. Burzynski, TVA, Regarding Best Practices to Establish and Maintain a Safety-Conscious Work Environment
ML0402305282004-01-14014 January 2004
Comment (134) of Mary Mastin Opposing Easing of Fire Protection Regulations That Affect Fire Barriers Protecting Electrical Cables in Nuclear Reactors
ML0400807702003-12-0404 December 2003
Comment (4) of Scott Poteet Re Shell Life of GFE
ML0202500892002-01-16016 January 2002
General Notice Comment Letter on Request for Hearing by NRC & Petition for Leave to Intervene in Matter of TVA Re Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to License
2015-05-18
[Table view] |
Text
rage I As of: May 02, 2013 Received:
April 30, 2013 PUBLIC SUBMISSION
/Status: PendingPost PUBLC S BMISIONTracking No. ljx-852e-6088 Comments Due: May 03, 201 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0037 Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Comment On: NRC-2013-0037-0003 License Renewal Application for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Tennessee Valley Authority Document:
NRC-2013-0037-DRAFT-0009 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-05491 L OI 3 Submitter Information
- U3r Name: Judith Canepa -Address: -F1 716 East 11 th Street #2P =New York, NY, 10009 --, Organization:
New York Climate Action Group M-j -General Comment The New York Climate Action Group strongly opposes the application by the Tennessee Valley Authority to renew the license for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, in light of the following grave concerns: 1. The plant has aged ten years past its intended lifespan.
An alarming number of parts that were replaced are considered non-compliant under your own standards.
- 2. Your agency cited the company for failure to perform corrective actions for problems with their other reactors.
Indeed, TVA has flagrantly ignored NRC standards for safety for decades. We cannot trust this company to ensure the safety of the surrounding communities.
- 3. TVA has had to perform emergency shutdowns of other reactors a shockingly high number of times. We cannot assume that the Sequoyah plant is handled differently from their usual way of running operations.
However, we must have access to information related to how many SCRAMs have taken place at this facility before being able to comment knowledgeably about this concern.4. As has been seen in other nuclear power plants, cutting a massive hole in the containment structure, already subjected to the high stressors of SCRAMS and simple aging, endangers the integrity of the structure itself and thus the ability of the ice-condenser system to keep the radiation out of the surrounding environment.
Our recommendations are that the license renewal application be denied and that nuclear materials be interred,.-0-https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=09000064812adc5 f&for... 05/02/2013 Page 2 of 2 on site.We support the swift transfer to renewable energy technologies.
Such a transfer is not only possible, it is possible now, and absolutely essential for the sustainability of human life. If Germany, Denmark, and other countries can do it, so can the United States. See the work of Mark Z. Jacobson, professor at Stanford University:
Shifting the world to 100% clean, renewable energy by 2030 http ://news. stanford.edu/news/2009/october 19/j acobson-energy-study-102009.html https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=09000064812adc5 f&for... 05/02/2013
