ML14107A130

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:40, 9 July 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (8) of Unknown Individual, Opposing License Renewal Application for Callaway Plant, Unit 1; Correction
ML14107A130
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 04/07/2014
From:
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
79FR10200 00008, NRC-2012-0001
Download: ML14107A130 (1)


Text

yi 2 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Page 1 of 1 As of: April 08, 2014 Received:

April 07, 2014 Status: Pending-Post Tracking No. ljy-8bej-15qg Comments Due: April 07, 2014 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2012-0001 Receipt and Availability of Application for License Renewal Comment On: NRC-2012-0001-0010 License Revewal Application for Callaway Plant, Unit 1; Correction Document:

NRC-2012-0001-DRAFT-0010 Comment on FR Doc # 2014-04582 F7 7m cc I PU rn U -1 '~5 rfl C~)m (11 Submitter Information Name: Anonymous Anonymous General Comment Please do not renew Callaway Nuclear plant license. Plants get more dangerous as they age. Nuclear power is too expensive.

The Callaway plant has not moved it's spent fuel rods into hard cask storage, and the wasted fuel rods are getting more crowded and more dangerous in the pool. No renewal should even be considered without proper on site storage of nuclear waste. It is time to spend our energy money on what is safer and more economical, and is quick to build--solar and wind.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 hAdd1 https://www~fdms~gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=09000064816a5d8d&for...

04/08/2014