ML18120A072
| ML18120A072 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 04/26/2018 |
| From: | Zoia C D Operations Branch III |
| To: | NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| Zoia C D | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17164A402 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML18120A072 (1) | |
Text
ES-201Examination Outline Quality ChecklistForm ES-201-2Facility: Fermi 2Date of Examination: 212612018ItemTask Descriptionlnitialsab*c**RITTENa. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N.atr*?b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance withSection D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all l(A categories are appropriately sampled.*VØ/1c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics4-Volr4d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected l(/A statements are appropriate.olll-q2.SIMULAToRUsing Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number ofnormal evolutions, nstrument and component failures, technical specifications, and majortransients.drvvb. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number andmix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedulewithout compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested uslng atleast one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from theapplicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.ff(brc-tlc.To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative andquantitatve criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and inSection D.5, "Specific lnstructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"'of ES-301 (includingoverlap).$0r"ry3.WALKTHRoUGHa. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributedamong the safety functions as specified on the form.(2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.(3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).(4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.(5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled areatasks meets the criteria on the form.0/P-errTb. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1 :(1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.(2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.(3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinationsû-vvryc. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix ofapplicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.rP$.-ry4.GENERALAssess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individualplant examlnation insiqhts) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.blu-/b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 samplinq is appropriate.^er..^Ø7c. Ensure that l(A importance ratings (except for plantspecific priorities) are at least 2.5.haro/d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC examsfr'az^ae. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.rIfr-e7f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate iob level (RO or SRO)1-l--"ryPrintedDate/-t1)-únto/tolt7-i;iua. Authorb. Facility Reviewer (.)c, NRC Chief Examiner (#)d. NRC Supervisor [.s, -ro\rdrf'l^)A.ktí,nll. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.# The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required