ML15034A368

FEMA, Submittal of Final Report for Seabrook Hostile Action Based (HAB) Plume Exercise Evaluated on 11/05/2014

ML15034A368
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	01/29/2015
From:	Colman S L US Dept of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency
To:	Document Control Desk, NRC Region 1
References
Download: ML15034A368 (298)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityFE.MA Region I99 High St., 5"h Floor/ Boston, MA 02110-2320"' FEMAJanuary 29, 2015NRC HeadquartersDocument Control DeskUS Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001To Whom it May Concern:Enclosed is a copy of the final report for the Seabrook Station Hostile Action Based (HAB)plume exercise that was evaluated on November 5, 2014.The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the State of New Hampshire and local emergencyresponse organizations successfully demonstrated their capabilities to implement off-siteradiological emergency response plans and procedures. Based on the evaluation of this exerciseby federal evaluators, there were no deficiencies. There were no Areas Requiring CorrectiveAction (ARCA). There was one prior ARCA from the 2012 plume exercise that wassuccessfully re-demonstrated and closed. There were five planning issues identified andsubsequently closed.State and local preparedness remains adequate to protect the health and safety of the publicliving in the vicinity of the Seabrook Power Station and provides reasonable assurance thatappropriate measures can be taken off-site in the event of a radiological emergency.If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at 617-832-4731,John Rice at (617) 956-7509, or Barbara Thomas at (617) 832-4703.Sincerely,SIleve L. ColmanRegional Assistance Committee ChairEnclosureE-copy: NRC Region Iwww'fctntig-Seabrook StationAfter Action Report/Improvement PlanExercise Date -November 05, 2014Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) ProgramW- FEMAPublished January 29, 2014 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/lmprovement Plan Seabrook StationSeabrook StationAfter Action Report/ImprovementPlanPublished Januaty 29, 2014ContentsExecutive Summary 5Section 1: Exercise Overview 61.1 Exercise Details 61.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership 61.3 Participating Organizations 7Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 132.1 Exercise Purpose and Design 132.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities and Activities 132.3 Scenario Summary 13Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 143.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results 143.2 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation 143.3 Criteria Evaluation Summaries 253.3.1 Massachusetts Jurisdictions 253.3.1.1 Massachusetts State Emergency Operations Center 253.3.1.2 MA Region I EOC 253.3.1.3 MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-1 253.3.1.4 MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2 263.3.1.5 MA Media Center 263.3.2 Risk Jurisdictions 263.3.2.1 Amesbury Local EOC 263.3.2.2 Merrimac Local EOC 273.3.2.3 Newbury Local EOC 273.3.2.4 Newburyport Local EOC 283.3.2.5 Salisbury Local EOC 283.3.2.6 West Newbury Local EOC 291 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station3.3.3 Support Jurisdictions 293.3.3.1 MA State Police Assembly- Troop A 293.3.4 New Hampshire Jurisdictions 293.3.4.1 NH State Emergency Operations Center 293.3.4.2 NH (SS) Emergency Operations Facility 313.3.4.3 NH Incident Field Office (SS) 323.3.4.4 NH State Police Communications Center, NH State 32Warning Point3.3.4.5 Rockinghamý County Dispatch Center 333.3.4.6 NH (SS) Joint Infornation Center 333.3.4.7 NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-i 333.3.4.8 NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2 343.3.4.9 MA (SS) Joint Information Center 343.3.5 Risk Jurisdictions 343.3.5.1 Brentwood Local EOC 343.3.5.2 East Kingston Local EOC 353.3.5.3 Exeter Local EOC 353.3.5.4 Greenland Local EOC 363.3.5.5 Hampton Local EOC 363.3.5.6 Hampton Falls Local EOC 363.3.5.7 Kensington Local EOC 373.3.5.8 Kingston NH Local EOC 373.3.5.9 New Castle Local EOC 383.3.5.10 Newfields Local EOC 383.3.5.11 Newton Local EOC 393.3.5.12 North Hampton Local EOC 393.3.5.13 Portsmouth Local EOC 403.3.5.14 Rye Local EOC 413.3.5.15 Seabrook Local EOC 413.3.5.16 South Hampton Local EOC 423.3.5.17 Stratham Local EOC 423.3.5.18 Hampton: Fun After School Program 432 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station3.3.5.19 Seabrook Police Incident Command Post 433.3.5.20 Building Block School 443.3.5.21 Langdon Place of Exeter 453.3.5.22 Kingston Child Center 453.3.5.23 The Village Preschool 453.3.5.24 Hampton Falls Child Care Center 453.3.5.25 The Learning Tree 463.3.6 Support Jurisdictions 463.3.6.1 Rochester Local EOC 463.3.6.2 Dover Local EOC 473.3.6.3 Dover MS Reception Center Operations 483.3.6.4 Dover MS Reception Center Dosimetry 483.3.6.5 Dover MS Reception Center Portal & Secondary 48Monitoring3.3.6.6 Dover MS Reception Center Female Mon/Decon 493.3.6.7 Dover MS Reception Center Male Mon/Decon 493.3.6.8 Dover MS Reception Center KI Decision 493.3.6.9 Dover MS Reception Center Registration 503.3.6.10 Dover MS Reception Center Vehicle Mon/Decon 503.3.6.11 Manchester Local EOC 50Section 4: Conclusion 52Appendix A: Best Practices 53Appendix B: Exercise Timeline 60Appendix C: Exercise Evaluators and Team Leaders 66Appendix D: Exercise Plan 69Appendix E: Eop 2053 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationThis page is intentionally blank.4 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationEXECUTIVE SUMMARYOn November 5, 2014 the U.S Department of Homeland Security (DHS), PreparednessDirectorate, National Preparedness Division, Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP),Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Region I conducted a Hostile Action Basedexercise of the 10-mile plume exposure pathway zone around Seabrook Nuclear Power Station.Out-of-sequence demonstrations of schools, host community schools, daycares and nursinghomes were also conducted per the new 8-year exercise cycle. The purpose of the exercise andthe out-of-sequence demonstrations was to assess the level of State and local preparedness inresponding to a radiological emergency at Seabrook Nuclear Power Station. The exercise andout-of- sequence demonstrations were held in accordance with FEMA's policies and guidanceconcerning the exercise of State and local radiological emergency response plans (RERP) andprocedures.DHS wishes to acknowledge the efforts of the many individuals in The State of New Hampshire,The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, local communities and private and volunteerorganizations that participated in this exercise.Protecting the public health and safety is the full-time job of some of the exercise participantsand an additional assigned responsibility for others. Still others have willingly sought thisresponsibly by volunteering to provide vital emergency services to their communities.Cooperation and teamwork of all the participants were evident during this exercise.This report contains the final evaluation of the biennial exercise and the out of sequenceactivities.5 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/inprovement Plan Seabrook StationSECTION 1: EXERCISE OVERVIEW1.1 Exercise DetailsExercise NameSeabrook StationType of ExercisePlumeExercise DateNovember 05, 2014ProgramDepartment of Homeland Security/FEMA Radiological Emergency PreparednessProgramScenario TypeRadiological Emergency1.2 Exercise Planning Team LeadershipSteve ColmanRAC ChairFEMA -Region One -REP BranchREP Branch Chief99 High Street, Fifth FloorBoston, Massachusetts, 02110617-832-4731Steve. Colman@fema.dhs.govJohn RiceSenior Technological Hazards SpecialistFEMA -Region One -REP BranchSenior Technological Hazards Specialist99 High Street, Fifth Floor6 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationBoston, Massachusetts, 02110617-956-7509John.Rice@fema.dhs.govBarbara ThomasSite SpecialistFEMA -Region One -REP BranchTechnological Hazards Specialist99 High Street, Fifth FloorBoston, Massachusetts, 02110617-832-4703Barbara.Thomas@fema.dhs.gov1.3 Participating OrganizationsAgencies and organizations of the following jurisdictions participated in the SeabrookStation exercise:State JurisdictionsSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRENew Hampshire Amateur Radio Emergency ServiceNew Hampshire Bureau of Emergency Medical ServicesNew Hampshire Department of Administrative ServicesNew Hampshire Department of AgricultureNew Hampshire Department of EducationNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesNew Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, Emergency ServicesUnitNew Hampshire Department of Homeland Security and Emergency ManagementNew Hampshire Department of Information TechnologyNew Hampshire Department of Resources and Economic DevelopmentNew Hampshire Department of Safety, Commissioner's OfficeNew Hampshire Department of Safety, Division of Fire SafetyNew Hampshire Department of TransportationNew Hampshire Division of Public Health Services7 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationNew Hampshire Fish and Game DepartmentNew Hampshire Governor's OfficeNew Hampshire Homeland Security and Emergency ManagementNew Hampshire Joint Information Center Public Information OfficerNew Hampshire National GuardNew Hampshire Public Information OfficerNew Hampshire State PoliceNew Hampshire State Police Troop ANew Hamshire Department of Homeland Security and Emergency ManagementCOMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTSMassachusetts Field Monitoring Team 1 (MA DPH)Massachusetts 2-1 -1Massachusetts Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Department of TransportationMassachusetts Emergency Management AgencyMassachusetts Joint Information Center Public Information OfficerMassachusetts National GuardMassachusetts State PoliceRisk JurisdictionsSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE RISK JURISDICTIONSTown of Brentwood Department of Public WorksTown of Brentwood Board of SelectmenTown of Brentwood Fire DepartmentTown of Brentwood Police DepartmentCity of Portsmouth Emergency ManagementCity of Portsmouth Fire DepartmentCity of Portsmouth Health DeptCity of Portsmouth Human Resource DeptCity of Portsmouth IT DeptCity of Portsmouth Police DepartmentCity of Portsmouth Public Works DeptCity of Portsmouth School DepartmentCity of Portsmouth Welfare DeptTown of East Kingston Emergency Operations Center8 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationTown of East Kingston Fire DepartmentTown of East Kingston Highway DepartmentTown of East Kingston Police DepartmentTown of East Kingston Town SelectmanTown of Exeter Board of SelectmenTown of Exeter Department of Public WorksTown of Exeter Emergency Management AgencyTown of Exeter Fire DepartmentTown of Exeter HospitalTown of Exeter Parks and Recreation DepartmentTown of Exeter Police DepartmentTown of Exeter Public Health CordinatorTown of Exeter Public Safety Dispatch UnitTown of Exeter Public SchoolsTown of Exeter Town ManagerTown of Greenland Department of Public WorksTown of Greenland Police DepartmentTown of Greenland Town Office StaffTown of Hampton Falls Board of SelectmenTown of Hampton Falls Emergency ManagementTown of Hampton Falls Fire DepartmentTown of Hampton Falls Highway and Road AgentTown of Hampton Falls Police DepartmentTown of Hampton Town Department of BuildingsTown of Hampton Town Emergency ManagementTown of Hampton Town Emergency Medical ServicesTown of Hampton Town Fire DepartmentTown of Hampton Town Police DepartmentTown of Hampton Town Public Works DepartmentTown of Kingston Police DepartmentTown of Rye Department of Public WorksTown of Rye Fire Department.Town of Rye Municipal GovernmentTown of Rye Police Department9 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationTown of South Hampton Board of SelectmenTown of South Hampton ClerkTown of South Hampton Fire DepartmentTown of Kensington Elementary SchoolTown of Kensington Fire DepartmentTown of Kensington Police DepartmentTown of Kensington Road AgentTown of New CastleTown of North HamptonTown of NewfieldsTown of Newton Board of SelectmenTown of Newton Fire DepartmentTown of Newton Police DepartmentTown of Newton School SystemTown of Newton Town ClerkTown of Newton Transportation DepartmentTown of Seabrook Code EnforcementTown of Seabrook Emergency Management DirectorTown of Seabrook Emergency Management StaffTown of Seabrook Fire DepartmentTown of Seabrook Police DepartmentTown of Seabrook Public WorksTown of Seabrook Schools RepresentativeTown of Seabrook SelectmenTown of Seabrook Town ManagerTown of Seabrook Transportation OfficerTown of Seabrook Water DepartmentTown of StrathamCOMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS RISK JURISDICTIONSCity of Amesbury Department of Public WorksCity of Amesbury Emergency Managment AgencyCity of Amesbury Fire DepartmentCity of Amesbury HarbonnasterCity of Amesbury Mayor10 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCity of Amesbury Police DepartmentCity of Amesbury Public Health DepartmentCity of Amesbury RACES Sector 1 EasyCity of Amesbury Schools SuperintendentTown of Merrimac Emergency ManagementTown of Merrimac Fire DepartmentTown of Merrimac olice DepartmentTown of Merrimac Public WorksTown of Newbury Department of Public WorksTown of Newbury Fire DepartmentTown of Newbury Police DepartmentTown ofNewbury Town AdministrationTown of Newburyport Department of Public Safety Highway DivisionCity of Newburyport Emergency ManagementCity of Newburyport Fire DepartmentCity of Newburyport Harbor MasterCity of Newburyport Police DepartmentTown of Salisbury Department of Public WorksTown of Salisbury Emergency ManagementTown of Salisbury Fire/RescueTown of Salisbury Police DepartmentTown of Salisbury Town ManagerTown of West Newbury Board of HealthTown of West Newbury Council on AgingTown of West Newbury Department of Public WorksTown of West Newbury Emergency Management AgencyTown of West Newbury Fire DepartmentTown of West Newbury Police DepartmentTown of West Newbury Water DepartmentSupport JurisdictionsCity of Manchester Fire DepartmentCity of Manchester Health DepartmentCity of Manchester Housing and Redevelopment AuthorityCity of Manchester Information Services11 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCity of Manchester Public WorksCity of Manchester School DistrictCity of Manchester Security DepartmentCity of Manchester Transit AuthorityCity of Manchester Water AuthorityCity of Dover Fire DepartmentCity of Dover Police DepartmentCity of Rochester City Administration OfficeCity of Rochester Fire DepartmentCity of Rochester Police DepartmentCity of Rochester School DistrictRockingham County DispatchRockingham County Sheriffs DepartmentPrivate OrganizationsAmerican Medical ResponseNextEra EnergyFederal JurisdictionsFederal Bureau of InvestigationFederal Emergency Management AgencyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionUnited States Coast Guard12 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationSECTION 2: EXERCISE DESIGN SUMMARY2.1 Exercise Purpose and DesignThe FEMA Region I evaluated the Hostile Action Based exercise on November 5, 2014, toassess the capabilities of local emergency preparedness organizations in implementing theirRadiological Emergency Response Plans (RERPs) and procedures to protect the public healthand safety during a radiological emergency involving Seabrook Nuclear Power Station. Thepurpose of this report is to present the results and findings on the performance of the offsiteresponse organizations (OROs) during a simulated radiological emergency in HSEEP format.2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities and ActivitiesThe exercise objectives, capabilities, and activities are noted in the extent of play agreement,included in Appendix Section.2.3 Scenario SummaryThe exercise scenario was developed to evaluate the response of the exercise participants to aradiological emergency. The scenario is listed in Appendix: Exercise Plan13 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationSECTION 3: ANALYSIS OF CAPABILITIES3.1 Exercise Evaluation and ResultsThis section contains the results and findings of the evaluation of all jurisdictions and functionalentities that participated in the November 5, 2014 Hostile Action Based exercise, conducted totest the offsite emergency response capabilities of the State and local governments in theSeabrook Nuclear Power Station 10-Mile Emergency Planning Zone.Each jurisdiction and functional entity was evaluated on its demonstration of criteria contained inthe exercise evaluation areas as outlined in the Federal, Volume 67, No. 80 "FEMA -Radiological Emergency Preparedness: Exercise Evaluation Methodology" (April 25, 2002).Detailed information on the evaluation area criteria and the extent of play agreement for theexercise are included as appendices to this report.3.2 Summary Results of Exercise EvaluationThe matrix presented in the table on the following pages presents the status of all exerciseevaluations area criteria that were scheduled for demonstration during the drill by allparticipating jurisdictions and functional entities. Exercise criteria are listed by number anddemonstration statuses of those criteria are indicated by use of the following letters:M -Met (No Deficiency or ARCAs assessed and no unresolved ARCAs from prior exercise)A -ARCA assessed or unresolved ARCA from previous exercisesD -Deficiency assessedP -Plan IssuesN -Not Demonstrated14 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationTable 3.1 -Summary of Exercise Evaluation (5 pages)DATE: 2014-11-05 USITE: Seabrook Station, NH 0 r'l 0E t Q-..M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not W'Demonstrated VV Cn E- CA CA CA4Z Z ZI 0,* ý- Z 0 , jj m OlEmergency Operationis,,lanageuent.. ... .. ..Mobilization lal M M M M M M N N MIM M MFacilities IbN M M M M M M M M MDirection and Control lcl M M M M M M M MCommunications Equipment id] M M M M.M M M M M M M MEquipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M M M M M M M M M M MProtective ActionDecision lvlaking: : " " "':Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2al MDose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b1 P MDose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 MPADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional 2cl MneedsRadiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2dlPathwayRadiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2elRelocation. Reentry, and ReturnProtective ActgnImplemeni ttn .*ioi l ..* ... .. ..Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al M M M M M M M M MImplementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the 3bl M M M M MPublicImplementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3cl M M Mmaccess/functional needsImplementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 M M M Maccess/functional needs IImplementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d) M M M MImplementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 M M M M MImplementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e]Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return 3flDecisionsFVeld:Measurement" .... and Analis ." ..:RESERVED 4a IPlume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2 MPlume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3 M MPost Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4bILaboratory Operations 4c IEnmer ibyNotificationandPubhclnfoi.1 ..... Li.m.Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5al M MRESERVED 5a2Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a4Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media 5bl M M MSupMorig.Oerations/Facilitios, and Registration of Evacuee '.iMonitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 6al15 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanMonitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their 6b]Equipment and VehiclesTemporary Care of Evacuees 6c ITransoortation and Treatment of Contaminated Iniured Individuals 6d]Seabrook Station16 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationTable 3.1 -Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 2/5)U U0 UDATE: 2014-11-05 w U 0 U UCD W 0 0U uSITE: Seabrook Station, NH C 0 U 9 W C UM: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not 5 C U g U -Demonstrated .E E V t -U .0Ernei-gency Opeiraions ManagementMobilization lal M M M M M M M M M M M MFacilities lb] M M M M M M M M M M M MDirection and Control Icl M M M M M NM M M M P M MConmmunications Equipment Idl M M M M M M M M M MI MEquipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M M M M M M M M M M M MProtectiveAction Decision.Making ." ; ., " ' " ._: ___Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2alDose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2blDose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional 2clneedsRadiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2d1PathwayRadiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2elRelocation, Reentry, and Return.... " " ": ~............ ...... .. '" ' Protective Actn i entian tation ' ...Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al M M M M M M M M Im M MImplementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the 3b] M M M M M M M M M M MPublicImplementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3cl M M M M M M M M M M Maccess/functional needsImplementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 M M M M M M M M M M Maccess/functional needsImplementation of Traffic and Access Control 3dl M M M M M M M M M M M MImplementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 M M M M M M M M M M MImplementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3elImplementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return 31f1DecisionsF ie ld M ea su rinm e n t a n d A n a ly s is .. ' ., ..... .RESERVED 4alPlume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4blLaboratory Operations 4c IEmrgenc~voilicationand Public Info * *.Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5alRESERVED 5a2Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a4Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media 5blMonitoring. Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 6al17 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationMonitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and theirEquipment and VehiclesTemporary Care of EvacueesTransoortation and Treatment of Contaminated Iniured Individuals6b,, I I I I I I I I I6c]118 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationTable 3.1 -Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 3/5)0DATE: 2014-11-05 zSITE: Seabrook Station, NH -o -- -0. 0M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not 2 U U U U U U UC)UEWUDemonstrated 0 v) ) Uo0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Emergency Operatio ManagementMobilization tat M M MM MFacilities lbl M M M IDirection and Control Icl M M M MCommunications Equipment ldl M M M MEquipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M M M MProtectiActin.Dectsi.i Making .-Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2alDose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b1Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional 2clneedsRadiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2d]PathwayRadiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2elRelocation, Reentry, and ReturnProie6tive Action lmilerhentatio "Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al M M M M MImplementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3bl M M M _Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3cl M Maccess/functional needsImplementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 Maccess/functional needsInplementation of Traffic and Access Control 3dl M M M I_ I MImplementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 M MImplementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e]Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return 3flDecisionsRESERVED 4alPlume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4blLaboratory Operations 4c IEmergency Notiflicaion and Pumbiit ..io". .* .a s. / PActivation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5alRESERVED 5a2Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a4Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media 5bl19 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/inprovement PlanSeabrook StationMonitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 6al M M M M MMonitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6bl M Mand VehiclesTemporary Care of Evacuees 6c ITransportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 6d I20 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationTable 3.1 -Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 4/5)DATE:2014-11-05 -U WSITE: Seabrook Station, NH C- tM: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not z < ci ci c i .Demonstrated <E < < < }'Zer~nv eations Mariuternent *... .U .: ,...;Mobilization lal M M M M M M M M M M MFacilities IbI M M M M_ _ M MMMDirection and Control lcl M M MM M_ _ M MMMCommunications Equipment ldl M MM M M M MMEquipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M __M M M ____M M M MProectlvACti~n Decision Making, ,: .__.. ....J. ,, ..".:Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2a1 __ MDose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b1l _ MDose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 ____MPADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/futnctional 2clneedsM MRadiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2dlPathwayRadiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2elRelocation, Reentry., and ReturnUoni '?v" < ..."Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al M M M M MImplementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3bl M __M M M M MImplementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3cl M Maccess/functional needsMM M M MImplementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 M MM M M Maccess/functional needsM MM M M MImplementation of Traffic and Access Control 3dl P ____M M M M MvImplementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 M M M M :MImplementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e1Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return 3f"1DecisionsFi~eld~l Measumreunent and .......___ ". s.. i..RESERVED 4a IPlume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4bl _Laboratory Operations 4c I1_Emergency Notification and Public. 1ntb-fo."' ..i, ., .. .> Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5al __ M __M M M MRESERVED 5a2 _Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a4__Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media 5bl __ M M ___M M M MSuppdil Oper a~l e .ti:: ., .; "' ... , : ..* ,.. ,.... ... ... .*YMonitoring. Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 6al _Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6b1and Vehicles21 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationTemporary Care of EvacueesTransportation and Treatment of Contaminated Iniured Individuals6d I I I I I I I I I I I I22 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationTable 3.1 -Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 5/5)P<U[.-..DATE: 2014-11-05 -SITE: Seabrook Station, NH 0,0 0~ u:,M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not U =Demonstrated r_ ' -MV --Ernergency 6iaOpera ,o e et .. J:..,., .... : .Mobilization lal M M M M M MIM M MFacilities lb] M MDirection and Control lcl M M PCommunications Equipment Idl M M M MEquipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M M M MProtective Action Decisiontn laking ...." ....".Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2alDose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b]Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 MPADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional 2clneedsRadiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion Exposure 2dlPathwayRadiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume Phase 2elRelocation, Reentry, and ReturnProtective.Action lmplementation.:4 , ."" ",Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al M M_ M IImplementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the Public 3b1 M M M M M M M M MImplementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3cl Maccess/functional needsImplementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 M M M M M M M Maccess/functional needsImplementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d1 M MImplementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 M MImplementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3elImplementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return 3flDecisionsField M eaui'ei ht n Anal ."... .. .. .RESERVED 4a 1Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling 4b]Laboratory Operations 4c 1Emergency. Notification and Public tnfo. , ... ..... ... .Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5al M MRESERVED 5a2Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a323 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/lnIprovement PlanSeabrook StationActivation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a4Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media 5bl M M M.g ."Monitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees 6alMonitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment 6bland VehiclesTemporary Care of Evacuees 6cITransportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 6dI24 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/htnprovetnent Plan Seabrook Station3.3 Criteria Evaluation Summaries3.3.1 Massachusetts Jurisdictions3.3.1.1 Massachusetts State Emergency Operations CenterIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, .e.1, 2.a.1, 2.b.1, 2.b.2, 2.c.1, 5.a.1, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.1.2 MA Region I EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: L.a. 1, 1.b. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 2.c. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.1.3 MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-1In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: l.a.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: None25 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvenment Plan Seabrook Stationg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.1.4 MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 1.a.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.1.5 MA Media CenterIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: I.d.1, L.e. l, 5.b. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.2 Risk Jurisdictions3.3.2.1 Amesbury Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.b.1, I.c.1, 1.d.1, L.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.a.1, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: None26 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/lnprovement Plan Seabrook Stationg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.2.2 Merrimac Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: L.a.1, 1.b.1, l.c.1, 1.d.1, i.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.a.1, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.2.3 Newbury Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: l.a.1, 1.b.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, i.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.l, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.a.1, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: 1.e.1.ISSUE NO.: 57-14-1el-P-04CRITERION: Equipment, maps, displays, dosimetry, KI, and other supplies aresufficient to support emergency operations.CONDITION: The Town of Newbury Seabrook Emergency Response Plan positionbinders by job function contained outdated procedures (2011 instead of 2014).Additionally, outdated forms were in the forms file box and emergency workerdosimetry kit box (e.g. Emergency Worker Exposure Forms).POSSIBLE CAUSE: Available controlled copy binders with complete SeabrookStation Radiological Emergency Response Plan and the Massachusetts EmergencyManagement Agency Resource Manual contained up to date procedures and forms.They were labeled as controlled copies, the position binders were not labeled as such(e.g. binder for Radiological Officer, Communications Officer, etc). The individual27 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationor agency that issues and keeps the procedures up to date may not be aware thatprocedures and forms are in additional binders and files and should be updated whenthe large controlled binders are updated.

REFERENCE:

NUREG 0654, P.5EFFECT: Without appropriate document version control, emergency responderscannot be assured that they are taking appropriate actions in response to aradiological emergency.RECOMMENDATION: Update position binders and replace appropriate forms.Ensure the process for procedure version control is updated to include the positionbinders and forms.e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.2.4 Newburyport Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: l.a.1, 1.b.1, 1.c.1, L.d.1, L.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.a.1, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.2.5 Salisbury Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a.1, l.b.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, l.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.a.1, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: None28 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationd. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.2.6 West Newbury Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.b.1, l.c.1, l.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.a.l, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.3 Support Jurisdictions3.3.3.1 MA State Police Assembly- Troop AIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 3.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.4 New Hampshire Jurisdictions3.3.4.1 NH State Emergency Operations CenterIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a. 1, L.b. 1, l.c. 1, 1.d. 1, Le. 1, 2.a. 1, 2.b.2, 2.c. 1, 5.a. 1, 5.b. 1.29 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationb. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: 2.b.1.ISSUE NO.: 57-14-2bl-P-01CRITERION: Appropriate PARs are based on available information on plantcondition, field monitoring data, and licensee and ORO dose projections, as well asknowledge of onsite and offsite environmental conditions.CONDITION: The NH Implementing Procedures for State Agencies AccidentAssessment Team (AAT) procedure has not been properly updated to reflect recentchanges dictating performance of AAT functions at the Emergency OperationsFacility (EOF) in Newington rather than the State Emergency Operations Center(SEOC) in Concord. The current procedure, dated April 2011 still directs personnelto travel to the SEOC and report directly to the SEOC Radiological Health TechnicalAdvisor (RHTA) rather than to the EOF, and the EOF RHTA.POSSIBLE CAUSE: Failure to update plans and procedures when changingimplementation strategies and protocols

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654 1.8, 110 NH Implementing Procedures for StateAgencies, Attachment #A, Accident Assessment Team.EFFECT: If accident assessment personnel had followed the existing procedure, theywould have reported to the wrong location, resulting in delays and/or inability toperform assigned functions.RECOMMENDATION: Revise NH Implementing Procedures for State Agencies,Accident Assessment Team procedure to reflect current practices and correctinaccurate information and AAT interface references associated with the SEOC.e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: 1.c.1.30 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationISSUE NO.: 67-13-lcl-A-01ISSUE: The State of New Hampshire Emergency Operations Center (EOC) placedconflicting weather information in blocks 7 and 8 of their Form 301B EOC ReportNumbers 5-8, causing confusion for stakeholders who received them.For example, Form 301B #005 reported in Block #7 ("Present MeteorologicalConditions") a wind speed of 4.18 mph from a wind direction of 216.7 degrees.Form 301 B #006 reported in Block #7 a wind speed of 4.20 mph from a direction of148.6 degrees and in Block #8 ("Extended Weather Forecast"), reported theEmergency Classification Level rather than the extended weather forecast. Form301B #007 again reported in Block #7 a wind direction from 148.6 degrees, butBlock #8 reported the wind from the southwest.CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.4.2 NH (SS) Emergency Operations FacilityIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.b.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.b.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 4.a.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: 4.a.2.ISSUE NO.: 57-12-4a2-A-01ISSUE: The New Hampshire Field Monitoring Team 1 (FMT 1) did not receivesufficient direction to support characterization of the release. FMT1 never receiveddirection to find the leading edge of the plume. The sample locations of 3.2, 3.7 and3.8 provided by the Monitoring Team Coordinator (MTC) to the FMT 1 Team Leadnever allowed FMT 1 to encounter any reading above background. Both air samples31 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationtaken by FMT 1 were taken in background areas.CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: During the November 5, 2014Seabrook Station Hostile Action Based (HAB) exercise, the HAB exercise did nothave a radiological release, FEMA staff and New Hampshire staff developed aradiological plume inject for the Monitoring Team Coordinator (MTC) and the FieldMonitoring Teams (FMTs). The two injects were implemented at the termination ofthe HAB exercise. Both teams were instructed to find a the sample point that was tentimes background which indicated plume edge. The MTC in coordination with theAccident Assessment group identified locations for the field teams to traversenearbthat would enable them to characterize the plume and find an area that was tentimes background. This was satisfactorily accomplished by both FMTs finding theplume and taking air samples that had a low level of radioactivity on the samples.This was performed in accordance with plans and procedures.g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.4.3 NH Incident Field Office (SS)In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.b. 1, l.c. 1, l.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 5.b. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.4.4 NH State Police Communications Center, NH State Warning PointIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, L.e.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: None32 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Statione. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: None,. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.4.5 Rockingham County Dispatch CenterIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.b. 1, 1.d. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.d.2, 5.a. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.4.6 NH (SS) Joint Information CenterIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 1.a.1, l.b.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.l, 1.e.1, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.4.7 NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-1In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: l.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 4.a.3.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: L.a.1.f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: None33 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.4.8 NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 1.d.1, I.e.1, 3.a.1, 4.a.3.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: l.a. 1.f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.4.9 MA (SS) Joint Information CenterIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a.l, l.b.l, l.c.l, l.d.1, l.e.l, 5.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.5 Risk Jurisdictions3.3.5.1 Brentwood Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: l.a.l, l.b.1, l.c.1, 1.d.1, I.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES- RESOLVED: 3.a.1.34 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-P-03ISSUE: During the conduct of the Seabrook Station (SS) Exercise on April 17, 2012,the Brentwood New Hamphire Emergency Operations Center (EOC) assigned aRadiological Defense (RADEF) Officer who had never been in the position before.The RADEF Officer did not understand his role in providing a briefing on dosimetryand potassium iodide (KI)to emergency workers before dispatching them to the field.He issued the dosimetry and KI without a briefing.CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3a1-?-02ISSUE: (Not found in the database!)CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.5.2 East Kingston Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.b.l, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, L.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None35 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station3.3.5.3 Exeter Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.b.1, l.c.1, 1.d.1, L.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.5.4 Greenland Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a. 1, 1.b. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.5.5 Hampton Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: l.a.1, L.b.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None36 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station3.3.5.6 Hampton Falls Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.b.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.5.7 Kensington Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.b.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.5.8 Kingston NH Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.b.1, 1.c.l, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: 3.a.1.ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-P-05ISSUE: The RADEF Officer at the Kingston Emergency Operations Center (EOC)failed to supply potassium iodide (KI) tablets with a briefing to the entire facility37 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationstaff as per Kingston Plans and Procedures.CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.5.9 New Castle Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: l.a. l, 1.b. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.5.10 Newfields Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.b.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: 3.a.1.ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-A-07ISSUE: The primary RADEF Officer in the Town of Newfields was unavailable andthe alternate RADEF Officer substituted during the exercise. The alternate RADEFOfficer was not familiar with zeroing the dosimetry. The Alternate RADEF Officedid not brief the officer of the need to contact the officer's immediate supervisorwhen the 200mR reading was reached. The Alternate RADEF Officer did not briefthe side effects of Potassium Iodide during the breifing until prompted by anotherstaff member. The Alternate RADEF Officer did not understand the meaning of the38 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station5 R turn back value and did not emphasize the turn back value meaning to the officer.CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: During the exercise demonstration,the RADEF/Health Officer showed familiarity with zeroing the direct-readingdosimeters. He also demonstrated an understanding of the radiation dose reportingthresholds and briefed EOC personnel on the need to contact him if the dosereporting thresholds were reached. In addition, he provided the correct instructionsfor the use of KI, including possible side effects. These activities were carried out inaccordance with the Town of Newfields Radiological Emergency Response Plan andthe previous exercise issue 57-12-3al-A-07 was closed.ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3a1-?-06ISSUE: (Not found in the database!)CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED:g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.5.11 Newton Local EOCin summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: l.a.1, l.b.1, 1.c.1, l.d.1, L.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None39 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station3.3.5.12 North Hampton Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a.1, l.b.1, 1.c.1, l .d.1, .e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.5.13 Portsmouth Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: L.a.1, 1.b.1, 1.c.1, l.d.1, L.e.1, 3.a.l, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: 3.a. 1.ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-A-08ISSUE: Following RADEF Officer distribution of dosimetry kits to the EmergencyOperations Center (EOC) staff, his emergency worker briefing was inadequate.The Radiological Officer summarized the briefing using the Job Aid and gaveinadequate information to emergency workers. The Radiological Officer's Job Aidconflicted with the Briefing Form the State provided to the EOC, which contains allinformation needed for emergency worker exposure control. The RadiologicalOfficer also skipped important information that emergency workers needed to bebriefed on prior to being deployed to the field (the Radiological Officer did not readoff the Briefing Form that the State had provided to all EOCs)- the RadiologicalOfficer did not address the 175mR exposure limit; only stated to notify the EOCwhen the dosimeter reaches 1 R. Furthermore, the Radiological Officer providedinaccurate information pertaining to women and did not request that female workers40 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Inmprovemnent Plan Seabrook Stationwho may be occupationally exposed (i.e., those who work in the restricted area at anuclear power plant or at a hospital or other facility and whose occupation carrieswith it the potential for some radiation exposure) are counseled to make a declarationin writing if they are or think that they may be pregnant.The Radiological Officer also had a Job Aid that conflicted with the Briefing Formthat the State provided to the Emergency Operations Center.The Radiological Officer was also using Rev 13 for Fornm 305A, which is out of date.Rev 14 Forms are the most up to date and and FEMA approved forms for emergencyworkers.The Emergency Operations Center also had the wrong inventory form for theemergency worker kits. The one provided was out of date.CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: This ARCA was succesfullydemonstrated during the 2014 SS HAB exercise on November 5, 2014. All activitiesdescribed in the demonstration criterion were carried out in accordance with theplans, procedures, and extent-of-play agreement.g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.5.14 Rye Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a.l, 1.b.l, I.c.1, 1.d.1, L.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None41 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station3.3.5.15 Seabrook Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a.1, l.b.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, L.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.5.16 South Hampton Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: l.a.1, 1.b.1, 1.c.1, l.d.l, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.d.1, 3.d.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: 3.a.l.ISSUE NO.: 57-12-3al-P-09ISSUE: Revision 14 of form 350A contains incorrect informationCORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: In the current version of Town ofSouth Hampton's Radiological Emergency Plan dated 2014, the 350 A form has beenremoved as part of the plan revision.g. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None42 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station3.3.5.17 Stratham Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a. 1, 1.b. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.5.18 Hampton: Fun After School ProgramIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: NoneO. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.5.19 Seabrook Police Incident Command PostIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 1.a. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e.1, 2.b.2, 3.a. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: 1.c.1.ISSUE NO.: 57-14-icl-P-05CRITERION: Key personnel with leadership roles for the ORO provide direction andcontrol to that part of the overall response effort for which they are responsible.CONDITION: There was concern over the attention to worker safety in the Incident43 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCommand Post. The Incident Command Post personnel did not receive dosimetryuntil after a General Emergency was declared. Additionally, the security at thecommand post was not given direction on who should be allowed access, whichcould allow an adversary into their midst.POSSIBLE CAUSE: Seabrook Police Department should have been involved inplanning from the very beginning of the process.

REFERENCE:

K.3.a The organization shall make provisions for 24-hour-a-daycapability to detennine doses received by emergency personnel.EFFECT: Personnel could have received unecessary dose, or put in other unecessarydanger.RECOMMENDATION: With the Incident Command Post located so close to thereactor building, it is imperative that personnel receive dosimetry as soon as possible.Assure security of the ICP by having a credentialling process or specific roster ofknown personnel. IC should request clearing/closing of beaches and waterwaysASAP to prevent additional attacks on the plant. Alternative locations for the ICPshould be considered.e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.5.20 Building Block SchoolIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None44 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvxement Plan Seabrook Station3.3.5.21 Langdon Place of ExeterIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: l.a.1, 3.b. 1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.5.22 Kingston Child CenterIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.5.23 The Village PreschoolIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 1.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None45 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station3.3.5.24 Hampton Falls Child Care CenterIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: L.a.1, 3.b.l, 3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.5.25 The Learning TreeIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 1.a.1,3.b.1,3.c.2.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.6 Support Jurisdictions3.3.6.1 Rochester Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 1.a.1, l.b.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.d.l.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: 1.c.l.ISSUE NO.: 57-14-1cl-P-03CRITERION: Key personnel with leadership roles for the ORO provide direction andcontrol to that part of the overall response effort for which they are responsible.46 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCONDITION: A table on the top of page 22 of the Rochester Host Community Plan(2014 edition) is missing the x-axis labels. Thus, there is no indication of whichEOC/Community element is responsible for which of the listed Emergency ResponseFunctions.NOTE: This is a STATE of New Hampshire Planning Issue[RECOMMENDATION]POSSIBLE CAUSE: When the State-prepared/disseminated plan was reduced insize, it's very possible that the x-axis tables were accidentally deleted.

REFERENCE:

2.a.EFFECT: There was no effect on the exercise play by Rochester personnel -however, there could be issues/confusion when/if the city develops position-specificprocedures or plans.This table would also apply to non-REP planning efforts the city develops to ensurecontinuity of those planning efforts across all incident responses.RECOMMENDATION: The State of New Hampshire should review the subjecttable on page 22 and make necessary corrections, then republish the page as a changedocument.e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.6.2 Dover Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a.1, 1.b.1, 1.c.1, l.d.1, L.e.1, 3.d.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: None47 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/lnprovement Plan Seabrook Stationd. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.6.3 Dover MS Reception Center OperationsIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. M ET: 1.a.1, l.b.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.6.4 Dover MS Reception Center DosimetryIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 3.a.l,6.a.I.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.6.5 Dover MS Reception Center Portal & Secondary MonitoringIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 6.a.1, 6.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None48 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationf. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.6.6 Dover MS Reception Center Female Mon/DeconIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 3.a.1, 6.a.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.6.7 Dover MS Reception Center Male Mon/DeconIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 3.a.1, 6.a.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.6.8 Dover MS Reception Center KI DecisionIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 3.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None49 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Iinprovenient Plan Seabrook Station3.3.6.9 Dover MS Reception Center RegistrationIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 6.a.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.6.10 Dover MS Reception Center Vehicle Mon/DeconIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: 3.d.1, 6.b.1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: Nonee. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None3.3.6.11 Manchester Local EOCIn summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:a. MET: L.a.1, 1.b. 1, l.c.1, 1.e. 1.b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: Nonec. DEFICIENCY: Noned. PLAN ISSUES: 3.d.1.ISSUE NO.: 57-14-3dl-P-02CRITERION: Appropriate traffic and access control is established. Accurateinstructions are provided to traffic and access control personnel.CONDITION: The City of Manchester, New Hampshire (NH) procedure has the50 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationwritten descriptions for the Dover, NH traffic control points instead of theManchester, NH.POSSIBLE CAUSE: When updating the procedure the Dover information wasinadvertently used instead of the Manchester information.

REFERENCE:

NUREG -0654, J. 1O.gCity of Manchester, NH Radiological Emergency Response for Nuclear FacilitiesPlan Host Community, May 2014, Attachment AEFFECT: Although the maps are correct for the traffic control points the writtendescription of the traffic control points may cause some confusion when it isnecessary to dispatch police officers to the desired locations.RECOMMENDATION: 1. Verify the traffic control point locations and update theCity of Manchester, NH Radiological Emergency Response for Nuclear FacilitiesPlan Host Community procedure to reflect the actual verbal description of the trafficcontrol points.2. Train the appropriate staff on any procedure revisions made for the traffic controlpoint locations.e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: Nonef. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: Noneg. PRIOR ISSUES -UNRESOLVED: None51 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSECTION 4: CONCLUSION52 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationAPPENDIX A: BEST PRACTICES1. Demonstrated StrengthsSummary: Demonstrated StrengthsDescription: NH State Emergency Operations Center-The staff in the NH SEOC was knowledgeable and worked very well as a team. The Directorrelied on the expertise of the staff to assist her to make informed and appropriate decisions toprotect the people of New Hampshire. There was strong internal collaboration between the NHSEOC Director and the SEOC staff members, most notably, the dialogue between the UnifiedCommand, Operations and Planning staffs. Regular meetings between SEOC decision-makingpersonnel were held in a dedicated SEOC conference room, which minimized distractions whilefacilitating exchange of needed informnation and viewpoints, aiding in the ability to formulateprotective action recommendations in a timely manner. Additionally, the Public InformationOfficer and Communication Officer and their staff had great teamwork and collaboration. Bothteams were very efficient with their work; they were very proactive in preparation ofassignments and always timely with the completion of their tasks.NH (SS) Emergency Operations Facility" Excellent teamwork" Constant reference to plans and proceduresNH Incident Field Office (SS)-Local Liaisons demonstrated outstanding service to local communities by providing clearinstructions and assistance for a number of aspects of the emergency response, including:WebEOC navigation, making requests for assistance from state and/or neighboring communities,and general situational awareness. Many liaisons went above and beyond to track downinformation for local communities.-Local Liaisons had a genuine team mentality and were continually looking out for one anotherto insure that no liaison missed important activities.NH State Police Communications Center, NH State Warning Point-The New Hampshire State Police Dispatch Shift Supervisor demonstrated a commendable levelof knowledge and familiarity of plans and procedures while carrying out his notification53 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationresponsibilities. Emergency information was relayed clearly, accurately and in a timely manner.Rockingham County Dispatch Center0 No demonstrated strengthsNH (SS) Joint Information Center* No demonstrated strengthsNH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-1-The New Hampshire Rad Health Laboratory maintains supplies of older radiation surveyequipment, including Eberline RO-2s and Eberline E- 140Ns. These instruments were withincurrent calibration and provide backup instrumentation to replace malfunctioning orcontaminated primary equipment, to equip additional monitoring and survey teams, and tocompare performance and readings of primary instrumentation.NH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2-No demonstrated strengthsBrentwood Local EOC* The Brentwood Emergency Management Director provided outstanding leadership, includingproviding accurate, up to date materials for each staff position, sharing information as availableto create a common operating picture, and clearly inspiring confidence in the Selectmen presentas well as among his staff.East Kingston Local EOC-The East Kingston Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Emergency Management Director(EMD) showed excellent command and control. Several of the staff, including the EMD, wasnew to their positions; however, the entire EOC staff clearly demonstrated knowledge of theirpositions and responsibilities. They used their checklists and collaborated with each other onsimilar tasks.Exeter Local EOC-The Town of Exeter, New Hampshire did an outstanding job integrating real time public alertand notifications into their EOC operations by updating the towns cable access channel with adrill message that both informed the public that the EOC was activated as part of the drill and54 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationvalidated the ability to access, update and control this public access television station from theEOC in an actual emergency.-The Town of Exeter, New Hampshire should be commended for their integration of public andprivate sector stakeholders into their EOC in order to better foster a whole of conmmnityenvironment. Exeter had representatives from Exeter Hospital, a major city medical facility andemployer and Philips Exeter Academy, a large private boarding school with an extensiveinternational student presence, integrated into their EOC operations allowing for rapidcommunication and coordination between these non-government stakeholders and townleadership.Greenland Local EOC* No demonstrated strengthsHampton Local EOC-No demonstrated strengthsHampton Falls Local EOC* Hampton Falls Selectmen were present throughout the exercise in the EOC; their relationshipwith the EMD was one of obvious mutual trust and respect. All decisions were discussedthoroughly among this group and decisions were ultimately based on which actions resulted inthe highest level of safety for the public. The EMD demonstrated an extraordinary commandpresence while maintaining a calm and reserved demeanor. His leadership was laudable and hisoperational methods assured total cooperation from every responding agency.Kensington Local EOC-No demonstrated strengthsKingston NH Local EOC-The Kingston, NH Police Chief injected a situation whereby a passenger train was disabledwithin their community. This prompted lively discussion of what to do with the 80 passengers onboard. The pros and cons of responsibility and liability were debated.New Castle Local EOC-The New Castle EOC personnel functioned as a well-trained and well-experienced integrated55 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Inprovement Plan Seabrook Stationteam in all areas. Each individual displayed expertise in executing his/her responsibilities andduties.Newfields Local EOC-The persomnel in the Newfields EOC demonstrated adherence to procedures and goodteamwork.* The Emergency Management Director assisted by the Police Chief demonstrated effectiveleadership skills in the management of the EOC response.-The laminated poster-sized copies of the Dosimetry-KI Report Form utilized by theRADEF/Health Officer enhanced his dosimetry briefing and were effective tools to enable abetter understanding of his instructions by the EOC staff.Newton Local EOC-No demonstrated strengthsNorth Hampton Local EOC-The Emergency Management Director (EMD), at the North Hampton Emergency OperationsCenter (EOC), demonstrated a strong ability to resolve conflicts. Communications between theNorth Hampton EOC and the Local Liaison at the Incident Field Office (IFO) was lost. Toresolve this breakdown, the EMD used alternative phone numbers with no success. Then hedirected the Fire Chief to use the State WebEOC to notify them of the problem.Communications were re-established with the Liaison at the IFO and there was no loss ofinformation flow.Portsmouth Local EOC-The Portsmouth EOC Emergency Management Director demonstrated excellent leadershipleading up to and during the 2014 Seabrook Station Hostile Action Based Evaluated Exercise.He has continued to stress the importance of training and staff participation in drills andexercises. This was evident, as all positions were manned and staff was fully engagedthroughout the entire exercise.Rochester Local EOC* The EOC staff has worked together for a long time. They are familiar with each other's strengthsand fully understand the process.56 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationRye Local EOC-No demonstrated strengthsSeabrook Local EOC-The Town of Seabrook Emergency Management Director (EMD) provided consistent, accurate,and ongoing details through briefings to the EOC staff concerning the incident at SeabrookStation. The EMD continued to provide necessary information to his staff throughout theexercise, provided opportunities for feedback from each Emergency Support Function (ESF)position, and maintained excellent direction and control that contributed to a successful responseby the Town of Seabrook.-The Town of Seabrook Police Department demonstrated the capability to provided protectionand security to their staff and the public through an actual incident at the police dispatch center.At the beginning of the exercise an individual identified as a serious threat to the public wasobserved parked outside of the Town of Seabrook Police Station. While observing andidentifying the suspect on camera, the dispatcher notified back-up law enforcement officers as aprecaution to respond to the entrance of the police station. Unknown to law enforcement of theintentions of the individual, four law enforcement officers greeted the suspect outside of thepolice station and took him into custody without incident.South Hampton Local EOC* The South Hampton response organization used the HAB exercise to train some of the nextgeneration of responders. It's extremely heartening to see young people taking an active role inresponse organizations.Stratham Local EOC-Each of the distributed DRDS and TLDs has a unique identifying serial number and bar code.The Radiological Officer has provided a personal bar code reader to read and record the barcodes on each of the devices. The serial numbers are then automatically entered onto thespreadsheet. This innovative process assures that each device is expressly linked to particularindividuals and avoids potential errors.-For a community of approximately 7,500 residents, Stratham Town has an EOC worthy of amuch larger municipality. To its credit, several years ago the Town invested heavily inconstructing a modem facility to provide a location to manage any hazards that might occur in57 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationTown. The main EOC is a large room sufficient to readily handle all possible staff, withsophisticated electronics for both wired and wireless Internet connections, flat-screen displays onthe walls displaying WebEOC and other data, a well-equipment side communications room, fullyhandicapped accessible via an elevator to the second floor, convenient restrooms, and variousother conveniences. The facility was well designed to facilitate interaction among the staff toassure a coordinated community response.Dover Local EOC* No demonstrated strengthsManchester Local EOC* The Manchester EOC has purchased fifty (50) LED light signs which will be used to displayemergency messages in the Manchester city area on a real-time basis to advise of the emergencystatus or actions to be taken.Massachusetts State Emergency Operations Center-The Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) demonstrated its expertise inresponding to an incident at Seabrook Station. The leadership was insightful and efficient, andMEMA staff members at all levels were clearly highly skilled in their positions. The PublicAffairs Officer and his staff were proactive in modifying the sheltering in place News Releasetemplate to more accurately reflect a non-release situation. The dispatchers completed theirnotifications in record time. All players displayed their commitment to public safety and theirdedication to accomplishing the task at hand.MA Region I EOC* No demonstrated strengthsMA (SS) Joint Infornation Center-The Massachusetts Public Information Officer (PIO) and Assistant PIOs were successful,efficient, and flexible in fulfilling their duties and disseminating information to the media. Thestaff was very well organized, promptly dealt with communication complications, and providedthe most up-to-date information about events underway during media briefings to ensure theirconstituents were aware of all situations.MA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-158 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station-No demonstrated strengthsMA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2* No demonstrated strengthsAmesbury Local EOC-The City of Amesbury Emergency Operations Center staff commitment to safety of the publicis shown through dedication and knowledge of emergency response.Merrimac Local EOC-No demonstrated strengthsNewbury Local EOC-No demonstrated strengthsNewburyport Local EOC-No demonstrated strengthsSalisbury Local EOC-Briefings were conducted frequently and in a very professional manner with full participationby all.West Newbury Local EOC-No demonstrated strengthsMA Media Center* The staff and director of United Way MA 211 clearly demonstrated their knowledge of plansand procedures for handling the various types of telephone calls from citizens in the SeabrookPower Station Emergency Planning Zone.Seabrook Police Incident Command Post* No demonstrated strengths59 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationAPPENDIX B: EXERCISE TIMELINETable 1 -Exercise TimelineDATE: 2014-11-05, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH1 ,...1 .. .1 1,:, .'.. ., ... .. : f.: , ..Unusual Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AAlert N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASite Area Emergency 0756 0812 0804 0821 0807 0814 0811General Emergency 0921 0936 0923 0946 0947 0942 0945Simulated Rad. Release Started N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASimulated Rad. Release N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ATerminatedFacility Declared Operational 0815 0839 0736 0750 0840 0730Governor's Declaration of State of Emergency 0822 N/A 0822 N/A 0922 0841Declaration of Local Emergency N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AExercise Terminated 1035 1031 1035 1035 1030 1032Precautionary Actions: Close Parks & Beaches N/A 0837 0954 N/A 0853 0841Precautionary Actions: Restrict Water Traffic 0841 N/A 0954 N/A 1003 N/APrecautionary Actions: Restrict Rail Traffic 0937 N/A 0954 N/A 1003 0945Precautionary Actions: Restrict Airspace 0937 N/A 0954 N/A 1003 0954Precautionary Actions: Shelter Livestock, Stored 0841 N/A 0954 N/A 0853 0841Feed & WaterI st A & N Decision: 0837 N/A 0842 0841 0853 08411st Siren Activation 0849 N/A 0849 0849 0853 0849I st EAS Message 0852 N/A 0852 0852 0853 08522nd A & N Decision: 0948 0948 0955 0952 1003 09542nd Siren Activation 1000 1000 1000 1000 1003 10002nd EAS Message 1003 1003 1003 10003 1003 1003KI Administration Decision: Emergency N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AWorkers Advised to take KIKI Administration Decision: General Public N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AAdvised to take KIKI Administration Decision: Emergency N/A 0948 N/A N/A N/A N/AWorkers Advised NOT to take KIKI Administration Decision: General Public N/A 0948 N/A N/A N/A N/AAdvised NOT to take KI I I I60 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationTable 1 -DATE: 2014-11-05,Exercise TimelineSITE: Seabrook Station, NH0Emrgnc ClasstIfi cation Level or 2Event. .. .. ........ .Unusual Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AAlert N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASite Area Emergency 0756 0814 0814 0813 0814 0812 0810General Emergency 0921 0945 0949 0954 0945 0950 0945Simulated Rad. Release Started N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASimulated Rad. Release N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ATermninated______ ______Facility Declared Operational 0815 0830 0817 0823 0815 0810Governors Declaration of State of Emergency 0841 0822 0854 0841 0843 0842Declaration of Local Emergency N/A N/A N/A N/A 0852 N/AExercise Ten-ninated 1037 1035 1040 1039 1039 1038Precautionary Actions: Close Parks & Beaches 0841 0841 0854 0954 0958 0958Precautionary Actions: Restrict Water Traffic 0841 084] 0854 0954 0843 0842Precautionary Actions: Restrict Rail Traffic 0954 0954 1001 0954 0958 0958Precautionary Actions: Restrict Airspace 0954 0954 1001 0954 .0958 0958Precautionary Actions: Shelter Livestock, Stored 0841 0841 0854 0841 0843 0846Feed & WaterI st A & N Decision: N/A 0845 0854 0841 0843 08451 st Siren Activation 0842 0849 0849 0849 0849 0849I1st EAS Message 0842 0852 0852 0852 0852 08522nd A & NDecision: N/A 0954 1001 0954 N/A 09582nd Siren Activation 0954 1000 1000 1000 1000 10002nd EAS Message 0954 1003 1003 1003 1003 1003K, Administration Decision: Etnergency N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AWorkers Advised to take KIKI Administration Decision: General Putblic N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AAdvised to take KI____________KI Administration Decision: Emergency N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AWorkers Advised NOT to take NA N NKI Administration Decision: General Public N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AAdvised NOT to take RI I___N/A N/A N/INA_/A_/61 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationTable 1 -Exercise TimelineDATE: 2014-11-05, SITE: Seabrook Station, NHUnusual Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AAlert N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASite Area Emergency 0756 0812 0815 0819 0815 0814 0815General Emergzency 0921 0950 0945 0945 0935 0950 0948Simulated Rad. Release Started N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASimulated Rad. Release N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ATerminatedFacility Declared Operational 0814 0737 0738 0735 0815 0823Governor's Declaration of State of Emergency N/A 0841 0845 0841 0847 0908Declaration of Local Emergency N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AExercise Termninated 1037 1037 1035 1032 1040 1039Precautionary Actions: Close Parks & Beaches N/A N/A N/A 0954 0849 0843Precautionary Actions: Restrict Water Traffic 0841 N/A N/A 0841 0849 0843Precautionary Actions: Restrict Rail Traffic 0954 N/A N/A 0954 0950 0843Precautionary Actions: Restrict Airspace N/A N/A N/A 0954 0950 0843Precautionary Actions: Shelter Livestock, Stored 0841 N/A N/45 0141 0849 0843Feed & WaterImst A & N Decision: N/A N/A 0845 N/A N/A 08431Fst Siren Activation 0849 0849 0849 0841 0849 08491 st EAoS MessaSee N/A 0852 N/A 0914 0852 0908522nd A & N Decision: N/A N/A 0945 N/A N/A 09572nd Siren Activation 1000 1000 1000 0955 1000 10002nd EAS Message N/A 1003 1003 1017 1003 1003KI Administration Decision: Emergency N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AWorkers Advised to take KIKI Administration Decision: General Public N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AAdvised to take KIKI Administration Decision: Emergency N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AWorkers Advised NOT to take 0I9 N0KI Administration Decision: General Public N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AAdvised NOT to take KI62 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationTable 1 -Exercise TimelineDATE: 2014-11-05, SITE: Seabrook Station, NH0C.)000.0~s..5)c':t0~'C-)0Y5/2Unusual EventN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AAlert N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASite Area Emergency 0756 0836 0816 0821 0811 0811 0826General Emergency 0921 0950 0945 0931 0950 0945 0926Simulated Rad. Release Started N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASimulated Rad. Release N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ATerminatedFacility Declared Operational 0850 0821 0740 0814 0815 0845Governor's Declaration of State of Emergency 0844 0841 0822 0841 0822 0841Declaration of Local Emergency N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AExercise Terminated 1041 1038 1032 1040 1035 1038Precautionary Actions: Close Parks & Beaches 0957 0841 0840 0854 0811 0954Precautionary Actions: Restrict Water Traffic 0844 0841 0954 0954 0945 0841Precautionary Actions: Restrict Rail Traffic 0957 1000 0954 0954 0954 0954Precautionary Actions: Restrict Airspace 0957 1000 0954 0954 0954 0954Precautionary Actions: Shelter Livestock, Stored 0844 0841 0840 0954 0822 0841Feed & Water1st A & N Decision: 0844 0841 0840 0841 0822 08431 st Siren Activation 0844 0849 0849 0849 0849 08491 st EAS Message 0844 0852 0852 0852 0852 08522nd A & N Decision: 0957 0954 0954 0954 0954 09562nd Siren Activation 0957 1000 1000 1000 1000 10002nd EAS Message 0957 1003 1003 1003 1003 1003KI Administration Decision: Emergency N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AWorkers Advised to take KIKI Administration Decision: General Public N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AAdvised to take KIKI Administration Decision: Emergency N/A N/A 0954 N/A N/A N/AWorkers Advised NOT to take KIKI Administration Decision: General Public N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AAdvised NOT to take KI63 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationTable 1 -Exercise TimelineDATE: 2014-11-05, SITE: Seabrook Station, NHEmergen iv Classification Level orn .* -"... .- ., ...., ,II.I :. ..Unusual Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AAlert N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASite Area Emergency 0756 0814 0801 0815 0814 0807 0810General Emerzency 0921 0950 0929 0954 0942 0939 0935Simulated Rad. Release Started N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASimulated Rad. Release N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ATerninatedFacility Declared Operational 0855 0807 0811 0840 0811 0820Governor's Declaration of State of Emergency 0954 0925 0925 0925 0925 0925Declaration of Local Emergency N/A N/A 0851 N/A 0851 N/AExercise Terminated 1039 1055 1057 1030 1039 1058Precautionary Actions: Close Parks & Beaches N/A 0837 0844 0849 0849 N/APrecautionary Actions: Restrict Water Traffic N/A N/A 0844 0849 0849 N/APrecautionary Actions: Restrict Rail Traffic N/A N/A 0845 N/A N/A N/APrecautionary Actions: Restrict Airspace N/A N/A 0845 N/A N/A N/APrecautionary Actions: Shelter Livestock, Stored N/A 1025 N/A N/A 1013 N/AFeed & Water1st A & N Decision: N/A 0837 0843 N/A 0839 09071st Siren Activation N/A 0849 0849 0849 0849 08491 st EAS Message N/A 0852 0852 0852 0852 08522nd A & N Decision: 0954 0948 0954 N/A N/A N/A2nd Siren Activation 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 N/A2nd EAS Message 1003 1003 1003 1003 1003 N/AKI Administration Decision: Emergency N/A 1025 1025 N/A N/A 1048Workers Advised to take KIKI Administration Decision: General Public N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AAdvised to take KIKI Administration Decision: Emergency N/A 0948 N/A N/A 1013 N/AWorkers Advised NOT to take KIKI Administration Decision: General Public N/A 0948 1047 N/A N/A N/AAdvised NOT to take KI64 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationTable 1 -Exercise TimelineDATE: 2014-11-05, SITE: Seabrook Station, NHU UEmergency Lev!e o , 0 .'E~~ventUnusual Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AAlert N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASite Area Emergency 0756 0811 0809 0815 0808General Emergency 0921 0944 0942 0943 0944Simulated Rad. Release Started N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASimulated Rad. Release N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ATerminatedFacility Declared Operational 0811 0823 0815 0820Governor's Declaration of State of Emergency 0925 0945 0929 0937Declaration of Local Emergency 0926 0950 0930 0908Exercise Tenninated 1102 1058 1057 1058Precautionary Actions: Close Parks & Beaches 0846 0845 0845 0844Precautionary Actions: Restrict Water Traffic 0846 0845 0845 0844Precautionary Actions: Restrict Rail Traffic N/A N/A N/A 0844Precautionary Actions: Restrict Airspace N/A N/A N/A 0844Precautionary Actions: Shelter Livestock, Stored 1023 1051 1025 0844Feed & WaterI st A & N Decision: 0843 0837 0845 08441 st Siren Activation 0849 0849 0849 08491 st EAS Message 0852 0852 0852 08522nd A & N Decision: 0958 0953 0955 09442nd Siren Activation 1000 1000 1000 10002nd EAS Message 1003 1003 1003 1003KI Administration Decision: Emergency Workers 1055 1051 1025 1050Advised to take KIKI Administration Decision: General Public N/A N/A N/A N/AAdvised to take KIKI Administration Decision: Emergency Workers N/A N/A N/A N/AAdvised NOT to take KIKI Administration Decision: General Public N/A N/A N/A N/AAdvised NOT to take KI65 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/]mprovement Plan Seabrook StationAPPENDIX C: EXERCISE EVALUATORS ANDTEAM LEADERS66 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationDATE: 2014-11-05, SITE: Seabrook Station, NHLOCATION. :', EVALUATOR AGENCYNH State Emergency Operations Center Rosemary Samsel ICFIMario Vigliani ICFIMiriam Weston FEMA RIINH (SS) Emergency Operations Facility Timothy Harris III Department of*Martin Vyenielo HomelandKenneth Wierman SecurityFEMA RIIIFEMA HQNH Incident Field Office (SS) *Cara Christianson-Riley FEMA RVIINH State Police Communications Center, NH State Warning Point *James Greer ICFIRockingham County Dispatch Center *Laura Forrest FEMA RIIThomas Gahan ICFINH (SS) Joint Information Center *Patricia Gardner FEMA -HQNH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-i *Michael Howe FEMA HQNH (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2 *Michael Shuler FEMA RIIlMassachusetts State Emergency Operations Center Deborah Blunt ICFI*Ingrid Pierce FEMA RIBruce Swiren ICFIMA Region I EOC *Darren Bates FEMA HQRonald Bonmer ICFIRobert O'Sullivan FEMA -RIMA (SS) Joint Information Center *Rebecca Fontenot FEMA HQBruce Foreman FEMA HQMA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-I *Anthony Honnellio EPAMA (SS) Field Monitoring Team-2 *Johanma Berkey FEMA RIXMA Media Center *Robert Swartz FEMA RIBrentwood Local EOC William Palmer ICFI*Laurel Ryan FEMA RIXEast Kingston Local EOC Robert Lemeshka ICFI*Lee Torres FEMA RIIIExeter Local EOC Frank Cordaro ICFI*Ryan Jones FEMA -RIGreenland Local EOC Thomas Essig ICFI*David Petta ICFIHampton Local EOC *Brian Hasemann FEMA RIISamuel Nelson ICFIHampton Falls Local EOC *Mark Dalton ICFIJames Hickey ICFIKensington Local EOC *Paul Nied ICFIMichele Skiermont ICFIKingston NH Local EOC Sonia Eischen ICFI*Marynette Herndon ICFINew Castle Local EOC Michael Burriss ICFI*Daryl Thome ICFINewfields Local EOC *Reggie Rodgers ICFICheryl Weaver ICFINewton Local EOC *David Jacobson ICFIMeg Swearingen ICFINorth Hampton Local EOC Robert Duggleby ICFI*Kent Tosch ICFI67 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationPortsmouth Local EOC *Taneeka Hollins FEMA RIMatthew Wiedemer FEMA RIIlRye Local EOC *Gary Goldberg ICFIJohn Zeidler ICFISeabrook Local EOC Korkean Dulgerian FEMA RII*Joseph Suders FEMA RIlISouth Hampton Local EOC *Joseph Keller ICFIBrenda Rembert ICFIStratham Local EOC *Danny Loomis ICFIMichael Meshenberg ICFIHampton: Fun After School Program *Brian Kennedy FEMAAmesbury Local EOC Clark Duffy ICFI*Brian Kennedy FEMAMerrimac Local EOC David Kayen ICFI*Bill Webb FEMA RXNewbury Local EOC *Marcy Campbell ICFIRichard Fournier ICFINewburyport Local EOC *Jill Leatherman ICFIRebecca Thomson ICFISalisbury Local EOC *Terry Blackmon ICFIJohn Wiecjorek ICFIWest Newbury Local EOC *Gary Bolender ICFIMichael Henry ICFISeabrook Police Incident Command Post *Bridget Ahlgrim FEMA HQLarry Broockerd FEMA HQB.uilding Block School Brian Kennedy FEMALangdon Place of Exeter Brian Kennedy FEMAKingston Child Center Brian Kennedy FEMAThe Village Preschool Brian Kennedy FEMAHampton Falls Child Care Center Brian Kennedy FEMAThe Learning Tree Brian Kennedy FEMARochester Local EOC John McGough FEMA -RI*Clayton Spangenberg ICFIDover Local EOC *Robert Noecker ICFIRichard Watts ICFIDover MS Reception Center Operations Brian Kennedy FEMADover MS Reception Center Dosimetry Brian Kennedy FEMADover MS Reception Center Portal & Secondary Monitoring Brian Kennedy FEMADover MS Reception Center Female Mon/Decon Brian Kennedy FEMADover MS Reception Center Male Mon/Decon Brian Kennedy FEMADover MS Reception Center KI Decision Brian Kennedy FEMADover MS Reception Center Registration Brian Kennedy FEMADover MS Reception Center Vehicle Mon/Decon Brian Kennedy FEMAManchester Local EOC Alan Bevan ICFI___*Wes Ryals ICFIMA State Police Assembly- Troop A *Brian Kennedy FEMA.Team. Leader68 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvemnent PlanSeabrook StationAPPENDIX D: EXERCISE PLAN69 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/inprovement PlanSeabrook StationWITHHOLD FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURECFE 14-05CONFIDENTIAL (until 11/6/14)owember 520UIn the interest of assuring that the health and safety of the general publicis protected in the event of an accident at Seabrook Station, and to meetthe requirements of 1OCFR50, Appendix E, NextEra Energy plans andconducts training drills.CFE 14- 0570 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationWITHHOLD FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE CONFIDENTIAL (until 11/6/14)ContentsA. Objectives and Extent-of-Play .................................................................................................................S co p e ................................................................................................................................................. A -1Objectives ......................................................................................................................................... A-3R u le s .................................................................................................................................................. A -7VISITOR OBSERVATION RULES .......................................................................................................... A-9B. Participant Instructions ...........................................................................................................................B.1 Responder Briefings .................................................................................................................... B-3GENERAL ............................................................................................................................................ B-3Control Room (Sim ulator) .................................................................................................................. B-5Technical Support Center ................................................................................................................... B-6Em ergency Offsite Facility .................................................................................................................. B-6Operations Support Center ................................................................................................................ B-7Field M onitoring Teams ..................................................................................................................... B-7Assem bly Area .................................................................................................................................... B-8B.2 GENERAL CONTROLLER GUIDANCE ........................................................................................... B-9B.3 LEAD FACILITY CONTROLLER GENERAL GUIDANCE ............................................................... B-11B.3.1 CONTROL ROOM LEAD CONTROLLER (SIM ULATOR) ............................................................. B-12B.3.2. TSC -LEAD CONTROLLER ....................................................................................................... B-14B.3.3 OSC -LEAD CONTROLLER ....................................................................................................... B-16B.3.3 EOF -LEAD CONTROLLER ....................................................................................................... B-18B.3.4 JIC -LEAD CONTROLLER ........................................................................................................ B-21B.3.5 ASSEM BLY AREA -LEAD CONTROLLER .................................................................................. B-24B.3.6 GUARD ISLAND CONTROLLER ................................................................................................ B-25ATT B-1 ERO CONTROLLER ORGANIZATION .................................................................................... B-26ATT B-2 ERO TELEPHONE DIRECTORY ............................................................................................. B-27ATT B-3 TYPICAL DRILL / EXERCISE CONTROLLER LOG ..................................................................... B-28ATT B-4 Drill Participant Com m ent Form ......................................................................................... B-30B.4 FACILITY CRITIQUE PROCESS ..................................................................................................... B-32C. Scenario Description and Tim eline .........................................................................................................71NARRATIVE SUM M ARY ...................................................................................................................... C-1 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationSEQUENCE OF EVENTS ....................................................................................................................... C-4SHIFT TURNOVER INFORM ATION ...................................................................................................... C-4DRILL SIM ULATOR SCENARIO INSTRUCTIONS ................................................................................... C-7DRILL SIM ULATOR SCENARIO INSTRUCTIONS -CFE 14- 05 ............................................................... C-7CONTROLLER INFORM ATION ............................................................................................................. C-9D .M e ssa g e s .................................................................................................................................................M ESSAGE NO.: D.1 ............................................................................................................................ D-1M ESSAGE NO.: D.2 ............................................................................................................................ D-2M ESSAGE NO.: D.3 ............................................................................................................................ D-3M ESSAGE NO.: D.4 ............................................................................................................................ D-4M ESSAGE NO.: D.5 ............................................................................................................................ D-5M ESSAGE NO.: D.6 ............................................................................................................................ D-6M ESSAGE NO.: D.7 ............................................................................................................................ D-7M ESSAGE NO.: D.8 ............................................................................................................................ D-8M ESSAGE NO.: D.9 ............................................................................................................................ D-9M ESSAGE NO.: D.10 ........................................................................................................................ D-10M ESSAGE NO.: D.11 ........................................................................................................................ D-11M ESSAGE NO.: D.12 ........................................................................................................................ D-12M ESSAGE NO.: D.13 ........................................................................................................................ D-13M ESSAGE NO.: D.14 ........................................................................................................................ D-14M ESSAGE NO:D.15 .......................................................................................................................... D-17M ESSAGE NO: D.16 ......................................................................................................................... D-18M ESSAGE NO.: D.17 ........................................................................................................................ D-19M ESSAGE NO: D.18 ......................................................................................................................... D-21M ESSAGE NO: D.19 ......................................................................................................................... D-22M ESSAGE NO: D.20 ......................................................................................................................... D-23M ESSAGE NO: D.21 ......................................................................................................................... D-24M ESSAGE NO.: D.22 ........................................................................................................................ D-25E. M ini-Scenarios ........................................................................................................................................E.1 CONTROL CELL INSTRUCTIONS FOR EXTERNAL ERO INTERFACE SIMULATIONS ......................... E-1E.2 Service W ater Pum p House Repair Team Investigation .............................................................. E-5E.3 EOD Investigation .................. .............................. E-7E.4 M S-V-22 ....................................................................................................................................... E-1 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationF. Plant Parameter Data ......................................................................................................................... F-iG. Radiological Data .............................................................................................................................. G-1H. M eteorological Data ......................................................................................................................... H-1I. C h e m istry D ata ................................................................................................................................... I-173 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSCENARIO REVIEW AND APPROVALDrill / Exercise Title:CFE 14- 05(drill / exercise title)Date(s): November 5, 20141. The following Emergency Response Organization (ERO) facilities will be activated inthis drill / exercise:[] Simulator Control Room7x AlternativeOperational SupportCenter[] JIC / ENC[] Onsite Assembly AreaAlternativeTechnical Support0 Center[] Emergency Operations FacilityRemote Monitoring AreaOffsite Laboratory2. The following ERO objectives will be demonstrated in this drill / exercise.See attached drill package3. The following initiating events will be used in this drill / exercise.See attached drill package.4. To support scheduled implementation, please complete all reviewsby:I have reviewed the attached drill / exercise scenario material, and concur that thescenario:* is adequate to support demonstration of the intended objectives.* me ets the scenario r se crjter" of the Emergency Preparedness Drill andExercise Procedure.EP Manager/ Supervisor: _____________Date: .'I have reviewed the attached drill / exercise scenario material, and concur that theselected scenario events are acceptable for development and implementation.Plant General Manager IStation Director: Date:Date:Site Vice President:74 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Inprovement PlanSeabrook StationIA. Objectives and Extent-of-Play75 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationWithhold from Public DisclosureScopeOn November 5, 2014, an NRC-evaluated Hostile Action-Based (HAB) Exercise will be conducted atSeabrook Station, which is designed to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR Part 50,Appendix E, Section IV.F. The primary purpose of this Exercise is to demonstrate Seabrook Station'scapability to protect the health and safety of the public during a HAB event. This Drill will evaluate theintegrated capability of the Emergency Response Organization responding to a Hostile Action event. Aportion of the Radiation Emergency Plan's basic elements will also be evaluated. The expectedemergency classification and related notification will be evaluated for the Drill/Exercise PerformanceIndicator.The postulated HAB emergency will require mobilization and response of onsite and offsite personnel toevaluate their capability to respond in an actual HAB emergency. Since Seabrook Station has opted todemonstrate its Alternative Emergency Response Facilities for this Exercise (reference NEI 06-04 Rev. 2,Appendix A, Objective #10), the HAB event is simulated to occur on a Saturday morning.The Alternative Technical Support Center (ATSC), Alternative Operational Support Center (AOSC),Emergency Operations Facility (EOF), and Joint Information Center (JIC), all located at 108 CorporateDrive in Portsmouth, NH, will be operational to support activities. The Simulator Control Room, locatedat the Operations Training Center, will be used in place of the actual Control Room. A Drill-NRC ControlCell will be used to simulate the requisite Control Room and ENS Communicator communications. ADrill-CAS/SAS cell will be located in General Office Building (GOB), to be used in lieu of actual CAS/SASfor onsite Security-related communications and coordination, and for Drill injects as necessary toprogress the scenario. Associated phone numbers or extensions can be found in the "ParticipantInstructions" section of this Drill Book, and will be made available to Exercise participants.The simulated Hostile Action attack will require activation and operation of an Incident Command Post(ICP), from which resources from Offsite Response Organizations (OROs) will be coordinated. Thedesignated ICP in the GOB to be the ICP for this Exercise.ERDS will be activated and used to provide plant data during this Exercise.Given that the focus of a HAB response is communication and coordination between Control Room,Security, the ERO, and the ICP, it was not necessary to include actual resources of the offsite responseorganizations in the Exercise. Therefore, response by EMS, fire, law enforcement, etc. inside theprotected area will be simulated via Drill injects.Given that the scenario is to occur on a Saturday morning, Exercise participation on site will be limited towhat would be a normal shift staff:Operations in the Simulator Control Room5 Nuclear System Operators761 Shift Chemist UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationWithhold from Public Disclosure1 Health Physics TechnicianThe required Security complement.All Exercise-related public address announcements will begin with "this is a Drill Message" and end with"this is a Drill Message-- All personnel not involved in the Drill please disregard this message." This isbeing done to allow the balance of the plant contingent not involved in the Exercise to conduct normalplant business while the above-listed shift staff personnel carry out the onsite portion of the Exerciseneeded to support the Exercise objectives.There will be very limited Drill play within the Plant. However, personnel may be requested by theControl Room, and later the ERO, to respond to various locations or equipment for assessments,troubleshooting, and maintenance. Such activities are expected to be coordinated between Security andthe Control Room onsite, with law enforcement and the ICP, and later with the ERO to ensure adequateprotection of personnel from any remaining adversaries after such time as all known adversaries areneutralized. Such requests may come before the arrival of offsite repair teams onsite, in order toprovide the Control Room and the ERO an earlier assessment of repair needs and priorities, or the moretimely completion of a high-priority task. However, the scenario encourages the need for repair teamsto be dispatched from the ATSC/AOSC.It should be noted that weaponry, attack targets, numbers of adversaries, etc. included in this scenarioare not part of the Design Basis Threat.77 CFE 14- OS OBJECTIVESies!s are based upon Nuclear Regulatory Commission requirements provided in 10CFR50, Appendix E, Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and Utilization Facilities, and inspection criteria listed in the NRC Inspection Manual.i1 guidance provided in NUREG 0654, FEMA-REP-1, Rev 1, Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Rodiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants, was used in developing the objectives.specific drill objectives are described in the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Drill and Exercise Manual, Chapter 3. NexteraEnergy Nuclear Fleet Planning Standards are described in EP-AA-101-1000, NUCLEAR DIVISION DRILL ANDPROCEDURE.evaluation criterion for each objective is provided to event Controllers in section B.*AA-101-1000EP-AA-101-1000 EPDEJING STANDARD DECRIPTION FACILITYOBJECTIVE OBJECTIVEFR 50.47(b)(#)]Demonstrate the ability to provide overall command and control of theCommand and emergency response by initiating, coordinating and implementing timely andI Control effective decisions during the event. Additionally, demonstrate themanagement of the ERFs by providing command and control within eachfacility.;signment of Demonstrate the coordination of the implementation of emergency?sponsibility 2 Operational measures and the exchange of information between the utility and Federal,Agreements State and local agencies and other support organizations having anemergency response role within the EPZ.Continuous Demonstrate the capability to establish and maintain continuous (24 hour) A.7 Demonstrate the ability to mobilize the station emergency response organization and EOFOperations operations for a protracted period, activate station emergency response facilities in a timely manner. TSCsite Emergency 3 Line of Demonstrate the ability to transfer overall command and control of the AS. Demonstrate the ability of on-shift personnel to implement the station emergency plan CR'ganizate on E rnLesof and to transfer appropriate emergency-related functions to other emergency response TSCrganization Succession emergency response. organization personnel. EOFOffsite Demonstrate the ability to notify the offsite Emergency Response A7. Demonstrate the ability to mobilize the station emergency response organization CR1 Notifications* Organizations consistent with the classification scheme including the and activate station emergency response facilities in a timely manner. TSCotification Methods verification of messages in a timely manner. EOFid ProceduresA7. Demonstrate the ability to mobilize the station emergency response organization CR2 ERO Notification Demonstrate the ability to alert, notify and mobilize ERO personnel, and activate station emergency response facilities in a timely manner. Guard IslandA4. Demonstrate the ability to gather, assess, coordinate, and disseminate1 Primary Media Demonstrate the ability to provide points of contact and physical locations information regarding station emergency conditions and emergency response JICAccommodations for use by the news media at the Joint Information Center. activities.iblic Education Andformation2 Media Briefing Demonstrate the ability of the Corporate Spokespersons to brief the media A15 Demonstrate the ability to coordinate the preparation, review and release of JICin a clear, accurate and timely manner, public information, and to provide timely and accurate information to the mediaSIGNIFICANT PLANNING STANDARD'0;-t00'0A-3 CFE 14- 05 OBJECTIVES.AA-101-1000EP-AA-101-1000 EPDEJING STANDARD DECRIPTION FACILITYOBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE:FR 50.47(b)(#)]Exchange of and general public.3 Public Demonstrate timely exchange of public information among designated JICInformation agency spokespersons.iTSC Support Of1 Emergency Demonstrate the adequacy of the TSC to support emergency response A7. Demonstrate the ability to mobilize the station emergency response organizationOperations activities. and activate station emergency response facilities in a timely manner. TSCEOF Support Of2 Emergency Demonstrate the adequacy of the EOF to support emergency response A7. Demonstrate the ability to mobilize the station emergency response organizationnergency Facilities Operations activities. and activate station emergency response facilities in a timely manner.id EquipmentOSC Support Of Demonstrate the adequacy of the OSC to support emergency response A7. Demonstrate the ability to mobilize the station emergency response organization OSC3 Emergency SOperations activities, and activate station emergency response facilities in a timely manner.6 Meteorological Demonstrate the ability to obtain current and forecasted meteorological No Specific Correlation TSCData information from primary as well as back-up and alternate sources. EOFAccident Demonstrate the ability to provide initial values and continuing assessment Al, P11. Demonstrate the ability to recognize station conditions and parameter CR:cident Assessment 1 Recognition And throughout the course of an accident as well as the parameter values which trends as emergency plan initiating conditions, and to develop potential solutions TSCAssessment* correspond to the initiating conditions for EALs and PARs. for placing the station in a safe, stable condition. EOFEXERCISE/ DRILL Demonstrate the capability to prepare a scenario drill or exercise package toJNDUCT DRILLS PREPARATION allow for training and testing of stations Emergency Response Plan.VJD EXERCISE EXERCISE / DRILL Demonstrate the capability to conduct drill / exercise and evaluateEVALUATION performance.TSCEOFDemonstrate the ability to implement the emergency plan during a hostile OSCaction-based event. CRJSTILE ACTION ICP,SED EVENT (NEI CAS / SASi-04, APPENDIX A)2 Demonstrate the ability to classify an emergency during a hostile based drill TSCor exercise. CRDemonstrate the ability to notify offsite response agencies during a hostile EOFbased drill or exercise. CRC00m0)0o001SIGNIFICANT PLANNING STANDARDA-4 CFE 14- 05 OBJECTIVES.AA-101-1000EP-AA-101-1000 EPDE4IING STANDARD DECRIPTION FACILITYOBJECTIVE OBJECTIVEFR 50.47(b)(#)]TSCDemonstrate the ability to make a protective action recommendation offsiteduring a hostile based drill or exercise. EOFCRDemonstrate the ability to make initial notifications to law enforcement and CRother first-responder agencies during a hostile action-based event. CAS / SASTSCDemonstrate the ability to communicate threat-related information to the EOFNRC during a hostile action-based event.CRTSCDemonstrate the ability of on-shift Operations and Security personnel to CR7 coordinate response actions among themselves, and with the IncidentCommander and local law enforcement agency (LLEA) personnel. ICPCAS / SASTSCDemonstrate the ability of on-shift Operations and Security personnel to CR8 coordinate with the Incident Commander for deployment of on-site and00:: offsite first-responders in a post-attack environment.CAS / SASTSCDemonstrate the ability to coordinate implementation of on-site radiation EOFprotection measures for offsite first-responders with the ICP. OSCICPTSCEOFDemonstrate the ability of the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) to OSCsupport operation of an Incident Command Post (ICP).CRICPTSC11 Demonstrate the ability to coordinate mobilization of the Emergency OSCResponse Organization (ERO) with Security and the ICP. ICPCAS / SASDemonstrate the ability of the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) to12 coordinate in-plant and on-site response actions with Security and theIncident Command Post (ICP).TSC13 Demonstrate the ability of the ERO to activate alternative facilities TSCOSC-oC,"C,-oSIGNIFICANT PLANNING STANDARDA-5 S CFE 14- 05 OBJECTIVES*AA-101-1000EP-AA-101-1000 EPDEJIING STANDARD DECRIPTION FACILITYOBJECTIVE OBJECTIVEFR 50.47(b)(#)]TSC14 As appropriate to the scenario, coordinate deployment of fire and medical OSCresponse resources between the ICP, on-site ERO facilities, and Security. ICPCAS / SAS15 Demonstrate the ability to account for on-site personnel in a post-attack CAS SASenvironment.16 Demonstrate the ability to perform an assessment of offsite radiological EOFconsequences as appropriate to the scenario events.17 Demonstrate the ability of the ERO to coordinate the development andrelease of public information in a post-attack environment.(5000-o5,5,0-00an5,l~I1an~2.0-o0550m-oC'sSIGNIFICANT PLANNING STANDARDA-6FI UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationRulesThe following general rules have been established to delineate the extent of play for responders to meetdrill objectives.The exercise will be conducted on November 5, 2014. Responders will not be informed of the sequenceof events or any aspect of the scenario.The exercise will postulate conditions necessitating the declaration of emergency classifications inaccordance with the Seabrook Station Radiological Emergency Plan and Emergency ResponseProcedures.Scenario data will be available real time, provided from the simulator.Responder -An emergency responder who performs assigned functions during a drill and exercise.Controller -An individual responsible for facilitating the progress of a drill or exercise (e.g., by passing amessage), observing responder performance, and assessing whether objectives have beendemonstrated. They will also assure the continuity of the scenario by initiating actions through pre-scripted messages, or as directed by the Drill Manager.Evaluator -Individual assigned to a drill or exercise whose function is to assess the performance ofresponders against drill objectives. Controllers often perform this function.Observer! Visitor-Personnel who serve no control or participatory function related to the event. Thesepersonnel should not interface with responders. They shall direct all questions to a CONTROLLER.Some responders may insist that certain parts of the scenario are unrealistic. The controllers have theauthority with approval of the Drill Manager to clarify any questions regarding scenario content. In somecases, it may become necessary for a controller to countermand responder actions to preserve thecontinuity and objectives of the event. Responders must accept the controllers word as final andproceed as directed.Scenario events are hypothetical. Any portions of the scenario depicting plant system operationaltransients are simulated events. NO scenario actions involve the operation of plant systems orcomponents or affect generation capability. To help delineate such actions all scenario messages mustbe proceeded and followed by the words: "THIS IS A DRILL".Participation of personnel directly involved in responding to an emergency condition should be carriedout to the extent necessary to meet the scope and objectives, including the deployment of radiologicalmonitoring teams, emergency repair/damage control teams, and other emergency workers. All actionsare to be performed, as much as possible, as if it were an actual emergency. Actions should be identifiedto the controller for guidance as to whether to play them out or simulate them.82 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/lmprovement Plan Seabrook StationCoaches, when identified on the event roster, are not meant to be an adjunct to the designated positionresponder. Coaches should provide guidance when required, but should ensure the response position isnot a team of two.If an actual situation occurs that requires a group to terminate its participation in the exercise, DrillManager will be notified,All personnel shall comply with all Federal, State and local laws. More specifically, traffic laws, such asspeed limits, will be observed. Additionally, event participants will adhere to all station access, safetyand radiation protection requirements.All personnel will avoid endangering public or private property, members of the general public, or theenvironment. It is the responsibility of all players, controllers and evaluators to correct any unsafeconditions that arise during the exercise.All participants will take part in a critique session in their emergency response facility immediately upontermination of scenario activities.Termination Criteria:1. The exercise may be terminated under any of the following conditions:a. All objectives are satisfactorily demonstrated;b. An actual onsite or offsite emergency develops; and/orc. Available time has expired.2. The following personnel may request temporary suspension or termination of the onsite portionof the exercise:a. Shift Managerb. Plant General Managerc. Executive Management3. Decisions to temporary suspend or terminate a exercise should be coordinated through the DrillManager.83 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCFE 14- 05VISITOR OBSERVATION RULESVisitors should request access to a facility at least one week prior to the drill.Access requests for Seabrook Station ERO facilities should be directed to the Seabrook Station EPDepartment. Requests to visit New Hampshire, Massachusetts or Maine facilities should be addressed tothe appropriate State emergency management agency.The number of visitors to a facility may be limited, or in some cases visitors mah be prohibited.Visitors will not be allowed to travel in any event-related vehicle.Unless approved by the Drill Manager, no photography or taping of events by visitors will be permitted.Note-taking is acceptable. Visitors may not take any event-related documentation (or copies thereof))without authorization from the Drill Manager.The visitor shall comply with these instructions and any further verbal directions provided by escort, ifassigned, and from facility drill controllers. Violation of these instructions or directions may result in thevisitor's expulsion from the facility.Visitors shall comply with security requirements at the facility during the drill, including sign-in and sign-out requirements.Visitors will wear proper identification at all times. At the EOF, visitors will be required to obtain a"Visitor" ID badge and proximity card from Access Control to allow transit to the Joint InformationCenter. These items must be returned to Access Control at the end of the drill.Visitors shall not interact with or assist responders during the course of the event. They must take carenot to cause congestion or noise which distracts players and controllers from their tasks.Visitors shall not operate any equipment (including telephones) without permission.During the event, the Drill Manager has final authority regarding visitor access, conduct and expulsion.84 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationIB. Participant Instructions85 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook Station86 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationCFE 14- 05B.1 Responder BriefingsGENERALIf, for any reason you are unable to fill your assigned role on the day of the drill, notify your supervisoras soon as possible and remind him/her that you are a participant in the drill and to contact the drillmanager in the simulator x2609 to coordinate a replacement participant.Real-time responseERO personnel should proceed to their facilities only after being notified of theemergency; DO NOT pre-stage or report early. Proceed to your assigned facilityupon the first means of notification of the event.Drillsmanship:* All communications should be prefaced and concluded with "This is a drill"." Stay engaged in the drill.* Ensure Controllers understands the basis key decisions made by you or your team.Do Not Bring any uncontrolled material to the drill. You are expected to use the procedures that aremaintained in the facilities.The site siren will not be sounded to notify station personnel of the emergency.The LAN-based PC messaging system will be used to notify personnel of the commencement of theeventOperational, Radiological and Meteorological Data:* MUST BE OBTAINED FROM AN MPCS or PC TERMINAL CONNECTED TO THE SIMULATOR* CONTROLLERS WILL PROVIDE SPECIFIC RADIOLOGICAL OR METEOROLOGICAL DATA TORESPONDERS.In order to present opportunities for demonstration of some drill objectives, this scenario may containradiological data that is "disconnected" from operational parameters. For example, certain radiologicaldata may be artificially elevated or presented in a time-compressed fashion. While being aware of thiscondition, players are expected to assess, and respond to, the data as presented. Questions should bedirected to a controller.Drill related calls:Calls to the "Control Room" should be directed to the SimulatorShift ManagerUnit Supervisor (603) 474-9521(603) 474-9521 x2608(603) 474-9521 x2991(605A474-9521 x2911 or x2912Work Control Supervisor UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCFE 14- 05DO NOT call the Online/Outage Control Center (OCC) with drill-related information or requestsunless directed to do so by a drill controller.DO NOT call vendors with drill-related requests. Calls for vendor services or support should bedirected to 603-468-3859. Record the time of any requested action and projected completiontimes on ER 2.OE forms.All routine industrial and radiological safety requirements shall be followed. If any participant sees apotential or actual conflict between drill "realism" and safety, safety ALWAYS has priority.Players are expected to coach each other in regard to safety and human performance tool use. There isrecent drill OE of our HU tool use (specifically 3-way communication) not being up to our standards.Let's help each other keep our standards high.If additional personnel are needed, do NOT call these individuals directly. All callouts of additionalpersonnel must be coordinated through the Maintenance Coordinator and the Administrative ServicesCoordinator per established procedural guidance.Controllers may provide performance improvement coaching during this drill so long as it does notaffect the Classification, Notification or PAR assessment. Additionally, specific positions may haveassigned coaches for this event. These coaches should not directly answer questions from others fortheir player. This is not a team of two, but one individual mentoring the other.Simulator data will be available to LAN PC's (via SDS) and MPCS terminals.The Personal Computers (PC's) in the TSC, OSC and EOF can be connected to the Simulator SDSby performing the following actions:1.2.Locate the "Simulator SDSfor Windows" icon on the PC desktop. Double-click / open it.When connected, " e I "I ' will appear in the lower right-hand corner of the SDSdisplay.3. If you have questions, contact G. Spaide at x7865 BEFORE the drill. Please realize that thereare a limited number of "Simulator SDS for Window" links. Use only if required to supportyour facility action.4. Remember to close any drill/simulator SDS windows after the drill has ended.A post-drill critique will be conducted. The goal of the critique process is to self-identify any weaknessesor deficiencies, and opportunities for improvement. Be frank and self-critical during the critique. Duringthe 2012 graded exercise, an incorrect PAR was made which was not identified or critiqued, ultimatelyresulting in a white finding. All players are expected to attend their facility critique and provide input.Make your drill comments clear and specific, recommending solutions when possible. Drill commentsshould be identified as 'Enhancements' (nice to do) or 'Deficiencies' (need to do in order to maintain theeffectiveness of the facility).Each facility manager is expected to work with the facility lead controller to identify significant issues. Insome cases, additional ARs may be required for uni e issues or concerns identified during the critique.For these items, participants are expected to write Ns prior to the end of the day. Simplifying the drill UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Ihnprovement Plan Seabrook StationCFE 14- 05AR process is meant to streamline the review of critique issues and in no way is meant to discourage anyindividual from writing an AR.Emergency facilities must be returned to their original state of readiness.Control Room (Simulator)The NRC Emergency Response Data System (ERDS) will not be activated from the Simulator.Telephone notifications to the States will be made using the Nuclear Alert System (NAS) or designatedbackup methods. Callback from the Health Departments to the Simulator Control Room is not expected.NRC Drill/Exercise Performance Indicator (DEP) -Performance opportunities in this drill will counttowards the DEP Indicator for Seabrook. Performance in the following areas affects this indicator.* Emergency Classifications* State Notifications* Protective Action RecommendationsRemember wind shifts, stability class changes, and dose assessment changes can affect ProtectiveAction Recommendations (PARs). Multiple PAR notifications may be required after the declaration of aGeneral Emergency. Each counts as a DEP opportunity. CFD 12-01 OE-missed DEP-AR 1728341.After control board walkdowns, the WCS will be sequestered outside of the simulator to simulate theirnormal work location in the OCC.SIMULATOR CONTROL ROOM ER 1.2 A EXPECTATIONS:* Announce UPDATE for EAL declaration." Notify GI Security per checklist and direct pager activation. The specific phone to use willbe identified during the pre-job brief.* When plant announcement is made in the simulator, a controller will notify the US inactual Control Room and request notification of station personnel via Gaitronics of anydeclaration announcement." Complete State Notification and give to WCS to make the Nuclear Alert System (NAS)phone call.* The drill NAS phone has been placed on CP295 cabinet. This is a live phone to Statewarning points. Follow the appropriate checklist.* If NAS phone fails, the backup unit is available in the Simulator. If that also fails, proceedto use phone line 2911 or 2912 to notify each State separately per the checklist.* A Fire Brigade Leader has been scheduled to be a Control Room Communicator. Calls tothe NRC (control cell) should be made using phone line 2911 or 2912." Completed copies of the State Notification Fact sheet, ER2.0B, and the NRC form, ER 2.0D,must be given to the Simulator Controller ASAP to allow transmittal to the TSC.89 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCFE 14- 05Technical Support CenterNRC Drill/Exercise Performance Indicator (DEP) -Performance opportunities in this drill will counttowards the DEP Indicator for Seabrook. Performance in the following areas affects this indicator." Emergency Classifications* State Notifications* Protective Action RecommendationsTSC responders need NOT ask for Shift Manager permission to enter the Control Room. Respond as youwould in an actual emergency -quietly enter the Control Room and proceed directly to the TSC. Do notforget your dosimetry.Assembly Area simulation/interface -The Maintenance Coordinator should call the Assembly AreaCoordinator at the Assembly Area to request additional response personnel. As requested, the AssemblyArea Coordinator will call-out personnel and direct them to report to a specified emergency responsefacility.A control cell (staffed by a controller) has been established to take initial and follow-up notifications tothe NRC. When ready to make NRC notifications, the ENS Communicator should call 603-468-3859. Donot use the existing facility ENS FTS phones circuit.The ENS Communicator should use 603-468-3859 on the 2 line phone to simulate calls to NRC. TheController will direct the player to callback within a pre-designated time (e.g., 20 minutes).WebEOC software links have been installed on the Site Emergency Director's (SED) personnel computerin the TSC. It is imperative that the Site Emergency Director notify the Response Manager before anupdate is posted so that Response Manager can update the EOF and Joint Information Center staffbefore it is displayed on the facility monitors. A copy of Supplemental Material 11-04, Web EOCClassification Board Instructions, has been placed at the SED and RM work stations. Questions orconcerns, please contact P. Casey (X7221) before the drill.Color 11x17 Classification chart (i.e., ER 1.1A, B, and C) tear-away pads have been placed at theEmergency Operations Manager's work station in the TSC. This supplements the black and white copiesassigned to multiple player files in both facilities.Emergency Offsite FacilityNRC Drill/Exercise Performance Indicator (DEP) -Performance opportunities in this drill will counttowards the DEP Indicator for Seabrook. Performance in the following areas affects this indicator.* Emergency Classifications* State Notifications* Protective Action RecommendationsColor 11x17 Classification chart (i.e., ER 1.1A, B, and C) tear-away pads have been placed at the90Technical Assistant's work station in the EOF. This supplements the black and white copies assigned tomultiple player files in both facilities. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCFE 14- 05Remember wind shifts, stability class changes, and dose assessment changes can affect ProtectiveAction Recommendations (PARs). Multiple PAR notifications may be required after the declaration of aGeneral Emergency. Each counts as a DEP opportunity. CFD 12-01 OE-missed DEP-AR 1728341.The ERO Technical Liaison should document any actions driven by the scenario using ER 2.OE form. DoNOT actually call RCDC, MEMA, and Maine State Police, NHPUC, and the State Technical Liaisons for thisdrill as they are not participating.A control cell (staffed by a controller) has been established to take initial and follow-up notifications tothe NRC. When ready to make NRC notifications, the HPN Communicator should call 603-468-3859. Donot use the existing facility HPN FTS phones circuit.The HPN communicator should dial 603-468-3859 to simulate calls to NRC. The Controller will direct theplayer to callback within a pre-designated time (e.g., 25 minutes). The Controller can call this phone linedirectly.National Weather Service (NWS) -in order to test actual capabilities, EOF radiological assessmentpersonnel should contact the NWS when required by Procedure ER 3.3 to obtain a currentmeteorological forecast. When the call is completed, a controller will provide a forecast to be used fordrill purposes.Assembly Area simulation/interface -The Administrative Services Coordinator should call the AssemblyArea Coordinator at the Assembly Area to request additional response personnel. As requested, theAssembly Area Coordinator will call-out personnel and direct them to report to a specified emergencyresponse facility.Operations Support CenterThe dispatch of OSC teams should be performed to the maximum practical extent (i.e., simulation ofactivities should be minimized). This means:* Obtain needed tools, parts, equipment, etc. unless precluded by size or other considerations* Obtain needed documents" A team should travel along the specified route to the assigned destination.* A repair team should arrive at the assigned destination and visually locate the component to berepaired. Once the component is positively identified and access to it confirmed, the team mayreturn to the OSC.* DO NOT enter any PROTECTED TRAIN or GUARDED EQUIPMENT area or room; discuss simulatedentry with a controller. Protected Train on the day of this event Is 'B'.* DO NOT direct or allow any operation of plant equipment, unless specifically directed to do soby a drill controller.OSC personnel should use the 1B (RP) radio channel. Precede and end all communications with "This is adrill message"Field Monitoring Teams 91Upon logging into WebEOC, Field Monitoring Teams should select "Seabrook-Training 2014" from theIncident drop down menu. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCFE 14- 05Assembly AreaAssembly Area simulation/interface -The Maintenance Coordinator and Administrative ServicesCoordinator should call the Assembly Area Coordinator at the Assembly Area to request additionalresponse personnel. As requested, the Assembly Area Coordinator will call-out personnel and directthem to report to a specified emergency response facility.In order to minimize drill impacts on normal station work activities, it may be necessary for theAssembly Area Controller to dispatch simulated personnel to a facility, e.g., additional mechanicsreporting to the OSC. If this is done, the Assembly Area Coordinator will clearly indicate that thedispatched personnel are being simulated. The individual requesting the dispatch of the simulatedpersonnel should ensure each simulated person's name is entered on the appropriate accountabilityboard form, etc.92 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCFE 14- 05B.2 GENERAL CONTROLLER GUIDANCEEach controller will be provided a scenario package that corresponds to their respective assignments. Itis the responsibility of the controller to become familiar with the scenario, appropriate implementingprocedures, message and mini-scenario implementation responsibilities, exercise documentationrequirements and any assignment-specific information prior to the event. The controller package mustbe considered "CONFIDENTIAL" until the drill / exercise is completed.Each controller will be requested to attend appropriate training or briefing sessions before each drill.Any questions regarding the scenario or assignments should be discussed at this time. Each controllershould ensure they are familiar with location(s) required by their assignment.Controllers must wear appropriate badges, specifically identifying themselves as controllers.Direct players to inform controllers if any actions are going to deviate from plant procedures.Controllers must keep a detailed narrative of their observations throughout this event. The narrativeshould note the time, location, activity, and player responses. Additional data may be required by theevent scenario or the evaluation forms. A master copy of the narrative is provided as an attachment tothis section (ATT B-3 ) make additional copies as needed. Controllers should refrain from includingpersonal bias, unsupported opinions or conjecture in this narrative.With exception of classification, notification, and protective action recommendations (DEPopportunities), controllers may discuss the proper use of scenario data or expected responses withplayers (coaching is allowed). When significant coaching is required it must be noted on the controllerevent narrative log to ensure that gaps are evaluated during the critique process.Controllers should ensure that interaction between responders and observers (visitors) does not occur.This may include the establishment of visitor areas in the emergency response facilities.Controllers will capture comments from event responders relating to realism of scenario to be evaluatedin the critique. It is the responsibility of the Facility Lead Controllers to clarify any questions that mayarise during the exercise.Controllers will ensure that any inquiries originating from the general public or news media as a result ofexercise activities are immediately passed to the Drill Manager who will notify the appropriate publicinformation personnel.Controllers will comply with instructions from the Drill Manager and the Facility Lead Controllers. Unlessotherwise instructed by the Drill Manager or Facility Lead Controllers, all messages and data should beissued at their designated times and/or as described in the event scenario.Contingency Messages will be used if a responder fails to take a major expected action (e.g., make anemergency classification) as indicated in the scenario outline. The Controller will give the contingencymessage to the designated responder and explain in as much detail as necessary what actions theresponder is expected to perform. Contingency messages are used to keep the drill on schedule. Thenecessity to use a contingency message must be documented in the controller's observations.The Drill Manager is the only individual who may authorize deviations from the scenario.Controllers are expected to coach each other, and Iyers, specifically in regard to safety and humanperformance tool use. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCFE 14- 05Controllers should be at their assigned locations as follows:Simulator: 0700 All Other Facilities: 0730Controllers should synchronize their watches with the SDS/Main Plant Computer System (MPCS) timedisplay AFTER the PC SDS display or MPCS terminal has been "swapped" to the Simulator. This willtypically be completed 30 minutes prior to the exercise start time.The NRC is not participating in this drill. Calls to the NRC should be made over the simulatedEmergency Notification System (ENS) and the Health Physics Network (HPN).94 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCFE 14- 05B.3 LEAD FACILITY CONTROLLER GENERAL GUIDANCEThe Lead Facility Controller is the controller responsible for a group of controllers at a specific facility orlocation.Their responsibilities include:Direction and coordination of drill / exercise activities within the facility in accordance with theevent scenario.Keeping the Drill / Exercise Manager informed of significant or unexpected events occurringwithin the facility.Capturing the significant comments during the facility critique following the drill / exercise.Distributing and collecting attendance sheets and responder comment forms.Collecting drill / exercise related records generated within the facility.Preparing the evaluation results using the input of assigned controller /evaluators.Initiating a Facility Critique following the conclusion of a drill or exercise.Ensuring that drill / exercise events are conducted safely, specified objectives are adequatelyevaluated prior to drill / exercise termination and conduct of the drill / exercise does notcompromise the operation of the station.Assisting the Lead Controller in development of the drill / exercise report, including therecommendation of corrective actions needed to address deficiencies.Ensuring corrective action program documents are written as appropriate.Clarifying any questions that may arise during the exercise from controllers or responders.During the period preceding the arrival of the players, the Lead Controller should lead a Job Site Huddlewith the other facility controllers to review roles, responsibilities, expectations, handoffs, etc.Lead Facility Controllers should ensure that players remain engaged in the event activities during anydistractions, specifically when lunch is served.Some exercise players may insist that certain parts of the scenario are unrealistic. Facility LeadControllers will clarify any questions that may arise during the exercise.Any inquiries originating from the general public or news media as a result of exercise activities shouldbe immediately passed to the Drill Manager who will notify the appropriate public informationpersonnel.Lead Facility Controllers should contact the Drill Manager at x2609 within 30 minutes of the exercisestart time to verify communications links and exercise readiness.95 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCFE 14- 05B.3.1 CONTROL ROOM LEAD CONTROLLER (SIMULATOR)1. Complete position checklist2. Following the critique, provide a performance assessment of the facility's objectives bycompleting the appropriate objective matrix.When determining whether, and to what degree, an objective was met, controllers shouldcompare observed performance against the listed performance attributes.3. Lead Facility Controllers should provide the following materials to the Drill / ExerciseManager.A. Responder-generated documentsB. Drill / Exercise Controller Logs (EP-AA-101-1000-F04)C. Critique results, including easel paper or white board transcription notes (if used)D. ERO Comment Forms (EP-AA-101-1000-F03)E. Completed objective performance assessment matrixF. A brief verbal or written summary of drill highlights and key issues96 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationCFE 14- 05 SIMULATOR LEAD CONTROLLER CHECKLISTBefore Drill/ExerciseD] Copy messages and data sheets asneededED Obtain controller identification(armbands, badges, etc)El Make copies of Drill/ExerciseController LogsEl Make copies of ERO CommentForms & Critique Review PointsEl Ensure spare battery for 4-way linkis obtained and charged.Day of Drill/ExerciseEl Conduct Job Site Huddle with other facility controllers,and distribute controller badgesEl Review simulator setup with simulator operator* Correct Protected Train is specified on MCB andMPCS displays* Station portable radio available on USS desk" Verify that ERF SDS/MPCS terminals are receivingsimulator data* Turn on ERDS modem if needed* Phones installed; SM -2608, USS -2991, 4-waylink, Lead Controller -2609* MPCS clock set to real time* Speaker phone in booth using extension 2608* Forms/packets have been checked* Simulator Gai-Tronics volume is turned up" Tags are hung per scenario* Shift turnover sheets prepared* Simulator annunciator alarms are on and RDMSAfter Drill/Exercise is TerminatedEl Make announcement per drillmessageEl Pass out copies of ERO CommentForm and Critique Review Points.El Conduct Drill/Exercise Critique persection 2 of controller package.El Collect all Seabrook Station EROComment FormsEl Collect all Drill/Exercise ControllerLogsEl Collect all player logs anddocumentationEl Inspect facility to determine if ithas been restored to the degreepractical.El Remind Operations controller toreturn station portable radioEl Verify that Computer Engineeringhas swapped ERF MPCS displaysback to the real plant computerEl Remind simulator operator toverify "island" status, i.e., no activecommunication links to outsideworld.ElElalarms are off* Op check the NAS line* Use different NSO names -on-shift crew vs. thoseresponding to OSC* Drill Primary Responders listed on duty boardConduct a briefing with the Operations crew.Brief the Control Room on the following items.* Conduct a walk-thru of the phonecommunications for the exercise* Actions required by ER 1.2-including:" Security -* Control Room to make PA announcements* Faxing of ER 2.0B and ER 2.OD* Drill-related radio traffic* Drill-related calls to the Control Room should bere-directed to the SimulatorReview expected actions with each controller.Periodically check in with Drill Manager on status ofobjective demonstrationsElEl97 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCFE 14- 05Controller InstructionsB.3.2. TSC -LEAD CONTROLLER1. Complete position checklist2. Ensure that a Gaitronics announcement is made when event is terminated to ensure all sitepersonnel are notified.3. Following the critique, Facility Lead Controllers should provide a performanceassessment of their facility's objectives by completing the appropriate objective matrix.When determining whether, and to what degree, an objective was met, controllers shouldcompare observed performance against the listed performance attributes.4. Lead Facility Controllers should provide the following materials to the Drill / ExerciseManager.A. Responder-generated documentsB. Drill / Exercise Controller Logs (EP-AA-101-1000-F04)C. Critique results, including easel paper or white board transcription notes (if used)D. ERO Comment Forms (EP-AA-101-1000-F03)E. Completed objective performance assessment matrixF. A brief verbal or written summary of drill highlights and key issues98 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationCFE 14- 05 TSC LEAD CONTROLLER CHECKLISTBefore Drill/ExerciseD] Copy Initial Conditions Message andPlayer Telephone Directory.D] Obtain controller identification(armbands, badges, etc).D] Make copies of Drill/Exercise ControllerLogs.U Make copies of ERO Comment Forms &Critique Review Points.After Drill/Exercise is TerminatedL Make announcement regarding thefollowing:-Workstation restoration/facility cleanup-Assembly and collection ofdocumentation-Facility critiqueL1 Request the Control Room to announcethat the drill/exercise has beenterminated.ED Pass out copies of ERO Comment Formand Critique Review Points.L Conduct Drill/Exercise Critique per section2 of controller package.IZ Collect all Seabrook Station ERO CommentForms11 Collect all Drill/Exercise Controller Logs11 Collect all player logs and documentationD1 Inspect facility to determine if it has beenrestored to the degree practical.L Ensure that all simulator-driven SDSwindows are closed (i.e., no SDS running).Ei Request the Health Physics controller toreturn the drill electronic dosimeters tothe HP Control Point.L1 Provide verbal or written summary of drillresults to the Drill Manager.L1 Provide all drill documentation to the DrillManager.Day of Drill/ExerciseIZ Establish communications with Drill/DrillManager.L Conduct Job Site Huddle with other facilitycontrollers, and distribute controller badgesED Review expected actions with eachcontroller.D Review messages and mini-scenarios forTSC-based personnel. Assign messagesto controllers. Instruct controllers tonotify you before messages are passed.L] Review objective assignments withcontrollers -who will watch for what.11 Distribute Initial Conditions Message and PlayerTelephone Directory to all positionworkstations.F1 Verify that MPCS terminal is receiving simulatordata and has correct time.DI Review expected actions with each controller.LI Remind SED and EOM not to talk with realControl Room staff -call the Simulator-Shift Manager x2608-Unit Supervisor x2991LI Ensure that the TSC Work Control Supervisorhas the drill instruction set for establishing the4-way link with the simulator.LI Inform the ENS Communicator to use the ENScommercial telephone line for calls to the NRCControl Cell. The communicator is NOT to usethe ENS telephone on the FTS circuit.LI Periodically check in with controllers on statusof objective demonstrationsLI Notify Drill/Drill Manager when all objectiveshave been met.LI When directed by the Drill Manager, terminateTSC drill/exercise play by informing the SiteEmergency Director.99 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCFE 14- 05Controller InstructionsB.3.3 OSC -LEAD CONTROLLER1. Complete position checklist2. Clearly identify the OSC "play" area within the Health Physics Access Control Point3. Following the critique, Facility Lead Controllers should provide a performanceassessment of their facility's objectives by completing the appropriate objective matrix.When determining whether, and to what degree, an objective was met, controllers shouldcompare observed performance against the listed performance attributes.4. Lead Facility Controllers should provide the following materials to the Drill / ExerciseManager.A. Responder-generated documentsB. Drill / Exercise Controller Logs (EP-AA-1O1-1000-F04)C. Critique results, including easel paper or white board transcription notes (if used)D. ERO Comment Forms (EP-AA-101-1000-F03)E. Completed objective performance assessment matrixF. A brief verbal or written summary of drill highlights and key issues100 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationCFE 14- 05 OSC LEAD CONTROLLER CHECKLISTBefore Drill/ExerciseEl Copy Initial Conditions Message.El Obtain controller identification (armbands,badges, etc).El Make copies of Drill/Exercise Controller Logs.El Make copies of ERO Comment Forms & CritiqueReview Points.El Review objective assignments with controllers -who will watch for whatAfter Drill/Exercise is TerminatedEl Make announcement regarding thefollowing:-Workstation restoration/facility cleanup-Assembly and collection of documentation-Facility critiqueDay of Drill/ExerciseEl Establish communications with Drill/DrillManager.El Conduct Job Site Huddle with other facilitycontrollers, and distribute controller badgesEl Review expected actions with eachcontroller.El Review messages and mini-scenariosfor OSC-based personnel. Assignmessages to controllers. Instructcontrollers to notify you beforemessages are passed.El Review objective assignments withcontrollers -who will watch for what.El Distribute Initial Conditions Message andPlayer Telephone Directory to all positionworkstations.El Clearly identify the OSC "play" area withinthe RP Access Control Point.El Verify that MPCS terminal is receivingsimulator data and has correct time.El Periodically check in with controllers onstatus of objective demonstrationsEl Notify Drill/Drill Manager when all objectiveshave been met.El When directed by the Drill Manager,terminate OSC drill/exercise play byinforming the OSC Coordinator.El Pass out copies of ERO Comment Form andCritique Review Points.El Conduct Drill/Exercise Critique per section 2of controller package.El Collect all Seabrook Station ERO CommentFormsEl Collect all Drill/Exercise Controller LogsEl Collect all player logs and documentationEl Inspect facility to determine if it has beenrestored to the degree practical.El Ensure that all simulator-driven SDSwindows are closed (i.e., no SDS running).El Provide verbal or written summary of drillresults to the Drill Manager.El Provide all drill documentation to the DrillManager.101 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCFE 14- 05Controller InstructionsB.3.3 EOF -LEAD CONTROLLER1. Complete position checklist2. Ensure the PA system is used for all briefings and the facility critique.3. Following the critique, Facility Lead Controllers should provide a performanceassessment of their facility's objectives by completing the appropriate objective matrix.When determining whether, and to what degree, an objective was met, controllers shouldcompare observed performance against the listed performance attributes.4. Lead Facility Controllers should provide the following materials to the Drill / ExerciseManager.* Responder-generated documents* Drill / Exercise Controller Logs (EP-AA-101-1000-F04)* Critique results, including easel paper or white board transcription notes (if used)* ERO Comment Forms (EP-AA-1O1-1000-F03)* Completed objective performance assessment matrix* A brief verbal or written summary of drill highlights and key issues102 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationCFE 14- 05 EOF LEAD CONTROLLER CHECKLISTBefore Drill/ExerciseU1 Copy Initial Conditions Message and PlayerTelephone Directory.U1 Obtain visitor list, badges and visitor rules.U Make copies of Drill/Exercise ControllerLogs.U1 Make copies of ERO Comment Forms &Critique Review Points.After Drill/Exercise is TerminatedDay of Drill/ExerciseU Establish communications with DrillManager.U Obtain controller identification (armbands,badges, etc). Located at AA/FFD workstation.U Place "drill in progress" signs in front of EOFso public can see. Located in garage.U1 Conduct Job Site Huddle with other facilitycontrollers, and distribute controller badgesU1Review expected actions with eachcontroller.U Make announcement regarding thefollowing:-Workstation restoration/facility cleanup-Assembly and collection of documentation-Facility critiqueUl Pass out copies of ERO Comment Form andCritique Review Points.Ul Conduct Drill/Exercise Critique per section 2of controller package.U] Collect all Seabrook Station ERO CommentFormsU Collect all Drill/Exercise Controller LogsU1 Collect all player logs and documentationU1 Inspect facility to determine if it has beenrestored to the degree practical.U1 Ensure that all simulator-driven SDSwindows are closed (i.e., no SDS running).U Turn off MPCS local printer.U1 Ensure all appliances are turned off in boththe EOF and IFO (e.g., coffee makers, PCs,copy machines, space heaters, etc.).U1 Turn off lights.U Secure all exterior doors.U Provide verbal or written summary of drillresults to the Drill Manager.Ul Provide all drill documentation to the DrillManager.U] Review messages and mini-scenariosfor EOF-based personnel. Assignmessages to controllers. Instructcontrollers to notify you beforemessages are passed.Ul Review objective assignments withcontrollers -who will watch for what.U Distribute Initial Conditions Message andplayer telephone directory to all positionworkstations.U Verify that MPCS terminal is receivingsimulator data and has correct time.U Have the Radiological Assessment Controllerinform the HPN Communicator to use theHPN commercial telephone line for drill-related notifications. The communicator isNOT to use the HPN telephone on the FTScircuit.Ul Brief the Security Coordinator onexpectations for arriving visitors.U Periodically check in with controllers onstatus of objective demonstrations.U Notify Drill/Drill Manager when all objectiveshave been met.U When directed by the Drill/Drill Manager,terminate EOF drill/exercise play byinforming the Response Manager.103 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook Station104 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCFE 14- 05Controller InstructionsB.3.4 JIC -LEAD CONTROLLER1. Complete position checklist2. Following the critique, Facility Lead Controllers should provide a performanceassessment of their facility's objectives by completing the appropriate objective matrix.When determining whether, and to what degree, an objective was met, controllers shouldcompare observed performance against the listed performance attributes.3. Lead Facility Controllers should provide the following materials to the Drill / ExerciseManager.A. Responder-generated documentsB. Drill / Exercise Controller Logs (EP-AA-101-1000-F04)C. Critique results, including easel paper or white board transcription notes (if used)D. ERO Comment Forms (EP-AA-101-1000-F03)E. Completed objective performance assessment matrixF. A brief verbal or written summary of drill highlights and key issues105 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationCFE 14- 05Controller InstructionsJOINT INFORMATION CENTER CONTROLLER EXPECTATIONS1. There are two types of controllers: facility operation controllers and mock news media.2. Documentation of assignments as described below must be maintained by all controllers.FACILITY OPERATION CONTROLLERS:Lead Controller Responsibilities -* Activation* Command & Control* Key Message Development* NextEra Seabrook Station Interface with Offsite PlOs" Evaluator/Observer ManagementController # 2 -* Intra-facility information flow from operations roomthroughout Joint Information Center* Monitor all MRC room activities* Information flow between MC & EOF* Media Relations/Rumor Control processes" Document distribution (bulletins, news statements,press releases)* Back-up to lead controllerControllers #3 & 4* Media Briefing Room activation & maintenance* Ensuring mock media continue to make calls tothe Media Relations Room (incl. Duringconferences)* Log news conferences:* Start/finish" Open commitments/unaddressedissues/rumors addressed* Organization and Control* Mock Media Management* "Media" are facilitating player performance;while being moderately challenging* "Media" stay within the boundsMOCK NEWS MEDIAAs reporters, you will be expected to"recreate" the scenario based on yourexperience at the Joint Information Center.Restructure the event in your log bydocumenting the info that you receive at theJoint Information Center:Stagger arrival timesCall the Information Line throughout drillUpon entry to Joint Information Center,ask questions about the facilityAsk when the next news conference willbe held; can you get interviewsDon't be satisfied with long gaps of timeLeave the building and come back; re-register as someone elseKeep the Media Relations phones going;even during press conferences ({Alwaysprecede calls with "THIS IS A DRILL"}Plant misinformation based on other newssourcesUse THIS IS A DRILL throughout theexercise prior to engaging in questionsAlways ask for explanation of acronyms orother "nukespeak"."Media" are facilitating playerperformance; while being moderatelychallengingRepeat the questions; ask them in adifferent manner; ask for recap of eventsDon't be satisfied with unansweredquestions; follow-upPlay off of information presented; makeup questionsGenerate misinformation to be asked ofthe Media Relations personnel anddetermine if it is addressed in subsequentnews conference.106 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationCFE 14- 05 JOINT INFORMATION CENTER LEAD CONTROLLER CHECKLISTBefore Drill/ExerciseU Copy Initial Conditions Message and PlayerTelephone Directory.U Obtain visitor list, badges and visitor rules.U1 Obtain controller identification (armbands,badges, etc).U Make copies of Drill/Exercise ControllerLogs.U Make copies of ERO Comment Forms &Critique Review Points.After Drill/Exercise is TerminatedU Make announcement regarding thefollowing:-Workstation restoration/facility cleanup-Assembly and collection of documentation-Facility critiqueU Pass out copies of ERO Comment Form andCritique Review Points.U Conduct Drill/Exercise Critique per section 2of controller package.U Collect all Seabrook Station ERO CommentFormsU Collect all Drill/Exercise Controller LogsU Collect all player logs and documentationU1 Ensure that no drill messages are recordedon the Seabrook Information Line.U Inspect facility to determine if it has beenrestored to the degree practical.U Ensure all appliances are turned off (e.g.,coffee makers, PCs, copy machines, spaceheaters, etc.).Ul Turn off lights.U Secure all exterior doors.U Provide verbal or written summary of drillresults to the Drill Manager.U Provide all drill documentation to the DrillManager.Day of Drill/ExerciseU Establish communications with Drill/DrillManager.U Conduct Job Site Huddle with other facilitycontrollers, and distribute controller badgesU Review expected actions with eachcontroller.U Review messages and mini-scenariosfor JIC-based personnel. Assignmessages to controllers. Instructcontrollers to notify you beforemessages are passed.U1 Review objective assignments withcontrollers -who will watch for what.U Distribute Initial Conditions Message andplayer telephone directory to all positionworkstations.U Periodically check in with controllers onstatus of objective demonstrations.U Notify Drill/Drill Manager when all objectiveshave been met.U1 When directed by the Drill/Drill Manager,terminate Joint Information Centerdrill/exercise play by informing theEmergency News Manager.107 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationCFE 14- 05Controller InstructionsB.3.5 ASSEMBLY AREA -LEAD CONTROLLERYou will call out personnel and direct them to facilities, as requestedCallout of craft/shift/bargaining unit workers is to be simulatedCall Operations Department if licensed operators are requestedDo not call the Help Desk for computer-related assistanceNo actual reporting if remaining drill play time is less than 60 minutes (for onsite responders) or 90minutes (for offsite responders).Phone numbers: Maintenance Coordinator x3961Admin Services Coordinator x4561Others -Emergency Response Telephone DirectoryIn order to minimize exercise impacts on normal station work activities, it may be necessary for theAssembly Area Coordinator to dispatch simulated personnel to a facility, e.g., additional mechanicsreporting to the OSC. If this is done, the Assembly Area Coordinator should clearly indicate that thedispatched personnel are being simulated. The individual requesting the dispatch of the simulatedpersonnel should ensure each simulated person's name is entered on the appropriate accountabilityboard, form, etc.108 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP.)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCFE 14- 05Controller InstructionsB.3.6 GUARD ISLAND CONTROLLERThe Guard Island Controller shall ensure that:* The site siren is not sounded." Drill emergency pager messages (text or numeric) are sent by the Security Officer activating the EROpagers. The numeric drill-use pager codes are listed below. [Critical peer check -see OperatingExperience in CR #04-08167]Unusual Event 712Alert 713Site Area Emergency 714General Emergency 715" "This is a drill" messages are sent by the Security Officer activating the LAN messaging system -see EMSmenu for drill-related messages." Following the critique, Facility Lead Controllers should provide a performance assessment of theirfacility's objectives by completing the appropriate objective matrix.When determining whether, and to what degree, an objective was met, controllers shouldcompare observed performance against the listed performance attributes." Lead Facility Controllers should provide the following materials to the Drill / Exercise Manager.A. Responder-generated documentsB. Drill / Exercise Controller Logs (EP-AA-1O1-1000-F04)C. Critique results, including easel paper or white board transcription notes (if used)D. ERO Comment Forms (EP-AA-1O1-1000-F03)E. Completed objective performance assessment matrixF. A brief verbal or written summary of drill highlights and key issues109 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationATT B-i ERO CONTROLLER ORGANIZATIONSimulator Control RoomDrill ManagerOperationsSimulator OperatorE. Spaide x2609B. Bryantx2993x2993Technical Support CenterCommand and ControlOperations SupportTechnical AssessmentTechnical AssessmentRadiological AssessmentOperational Support CenterCommand and ControlRadiological ControllerEmergency Repair Team (IC)Emergency Repair Team (IC)Emergency Repair Team (MM)Emergency Repair Team (MM)Chem Lab/WRGM TeamChem Lab/WRGM TeamR. DuarteB. BradburryP. TutinasR. NobleD. FlahardyJ. KennishC. EllisE. GreggR. EvansK. SchoffD. J. AntonellisTBDTBDx3956/3957 (Fax x7990)x3965Assembly Area CoordinatorN/Ax2400 or 603-773-7692603-773-7655 faxSecurityCommand and ControlCASSASSecurity Command CenterEmergency Operations Facility/Control CellCommand and ControlTechnical AssessmentTechnical LiaisonRadiological Assessment -EOF CoordinatorRadiological Assessment -Dose AssessmentField Team No. 1Field Team No. 2Industry ContactsM. Hambrookx8053X TBDX TBDJ. SobatkaS. SamstagM. TooleP. CaseyD. RobinsonM. NadeauR. JonesP. Willoughby603-468-3885x4571TBDJoint Information CenterCommand and ControlMediaN. Durand 603-468-3854110 R.McCabeM. MitchellTBD UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationCFE 14- 05Controller InstructionsATT B-2 ERO TELEPHONE DIRECTORYEXTERNAL ORGANIZATIONSRemember toAmerican Nuclear InsurersAssembly Area Coordinator -INPONational Weather ServiceNuclear Energy InstituteNRC Emergency NotificationSystem (ENS)NRC Health Physics Network (HPN)Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited/Nuclear Mutual LimitedPSNH DispatcherRSCSState NotificationsWestinghouseOther Vendor ContactsCONTROL ROOM POSITIONS1. Shift Manager2. Unit Supervisoruse "This is a Drill..."Actual contacts should be made to ANI.x2400(603)-773-7692Actual contacts should be made to the INPOemergency operations center.Actual contacts should be made to the NWS.Actual contacts should be made to NEI.Control cell number 603-468-3857Control cell number 603-468-3857Actual contacts should be made toNEIL/NML.Control cell number 603-468-3859Control cell number 603-468-3859Use actual numbers.Control cell number 603-468-3859Control cell number 603-468-3859(603) 474-9521 x 2608(603) 474-9521 x 2991111 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationATT B-3 TYPICAL DRILL / EXERCISE CONTROLLER LOG112 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationTYPICAL DRILL / EXERCISE CONTROLLER LOGDrill / Exercise:CFE 14- 05Drill / Exercise Date: November 5. 2014Controller's Name (print):Controller's Location / Assignment:Observations should include the proper and effective use of procedures, equipment andpersonnel. Comments concerning drill performance should document: the time of observation,personnel or equipment involved, procedures involved, and the impact that the condition hadon the ability of the player organization to meet its objectives.TIME OBSERVATIONiiii113EP-AA-101-1000-F04Page __ of UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationATT B-4 Drill Participant Comment Form114 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationDrill Participant FeedbackDid the procedures provide adequate guidance and direction for you to perform thetasks assigned to your function? ED YES D NOIf NO, please provide comments:Was the necessary equipment available and operable to support your assignedactivities? If NO, please provide comments:ED YES El NODid this drill illustrate your need for additional training for the position you have beenassigned? ED YES ED NOIf YES, please provide comments:Did this drill enhance your proficiency in your assigned position and as an emergencyresponder? ED YES ED NOIf NO, please provide comments:Please provide any additional comments regarding the drill or your training that were notaddressed above:115Name (Optional): Date: November 5, 2014I Facility:I Position:I1 B-31 'I UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationB.4 FACILITY CRITIQUE PROCESSControllers should avoid any commitments that are beyond the authority of the controllerorganization. Solutions are not the focus of the critique.1. Following termination of the drill, Facility Lead Controllers should perform the followingactions:A. ALWAYS use microphone, when available.B. Make announcement per message D.23C. Distribute Drill Participant Feedback Form, B-4, and Drill / Exercise Critique ReviewPoints (located in this section) or equivalent, to all responders.D. Direct responders to take the following actions.(1) Save all materials for review(2) Restore their facilities / areas to the original state of readiness.(2) Conduct a self-critique, by functional area, during the period before the facilitycritique. Drill / Exercise Critique Review Points should be used to stimulatediscussion.(3) Designate a spokesperson, as appropriate for each functional area to present theself-critique results in the combined facility critique.E. Assign a scribe to ensure comments are captured.2. While responders are self-critiquing, controllers should caucus in a separate area andsummarize their observations. Keep this meeting brief and focus on the more significantissues.The formal facility critique cannot begin until controllers have rejoined the responders.3. Each Facility Manager (or lead controller in their absence) will facilitate a critique of drillactivities at his/her assigned emergency response facility. This should be done in thefollowing manner.A. As appropriate, set up a display of the items for discussion.B. Announce that the critique has started, and briefly explain the process and goal.(1) We want to self-identify all weaknesses and deficiencies. Discuss importance ofbeing self critical.(2) Provide the ERO examples of a Risk Significant Planning Standard and what itmeans from a regulatory standpoint, critique process and overall importance asit relates to the protection of the health and welfare of the public.(3) Identify Strengths as approff te. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station(4) Every responder should feel comfortable sharing successes and challenges as itrelates to their team's performance. Discuss importance of everyone beinginvolved by providing written or verbal critique comments.(5) Discuss that all written material from the facility (checklists, logs, faxes, etc.)will be collected at the end of the critique.C. Review the scenario with the responders.D. Solicit feedback and comments from each functional area in the facility (e.g.,command and control, technical assessment / support, radiological assessment /support, repair and corrective actions, administrative support, etc.).E. Closely monitor the conduct and progress of the critique, and provide direction asneeded to ensure a self-critical / thorough review. Additional focus should beprovided on areas associated with RSPS.F. Resist rationalizing actual performance vs. expected performance, ensure thetimeframes for events are captured and compared between actual and expected.(1) Ensure that all deviations from the scenario expected performance areportrayed to the Drill / Exercise Manager for evaluation.G. At the critique conclusion, summarize the preliminary results:(1) Status of Major Objectiveso Command and Controlo Facility Activationo Onsite Protective Measureso Augmentationo Inter and Intra facility communicationso Adequacy and Use of Procedureso Equipmento Human Performance Toolso Effectiveness of Critiqueo Other(2) NEI 99-02 Performance Indicator opportunities: emergency classification, Statenotifications, and PARs. State that these results are preliminary and subject tofurther review by the EP Department. If there is any doubt / question about theresults of an opportunity, state that the result is Indeterminate and that the EPDepartment will determine the opportunity outcome.(3) Accident AssessmentH. Ensure that all critique comments are captured (e.g., scribe, easel, ERO CommentForms, etc.). All individuals should have the opportunity to provide comments duringthe critique.117 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationResponders should generate ARs prior to the end of business that day for any critiqueitems deemed needed during the critique.4. Following the critique, Facility Lead Controllers should provide a performance assessmentof their facility's objectives by completing the appropriate objective matrix.A. When determining whether, and to what degree, an objective was met, controllersshould compare observed performance against the listed performance attributes.5. Lead Facility Controllers should provide the following materials to the Drill / ExerciseManager. This meeting may take place following the drill or exercise (same day or nextday).A. Responder-generated documentsB. Drill / Exercise Controller Logs (EP-AA-101-1000-F04)C. Critique results, including easel paper or white board transcription notes (if used)D. Drill Participant Feedback FormsE. Completed objective performance assessment matrixF. A brief verbal or written summary of drill highlights and key issues6. The Drill / Exercise Manager will review the expected results from the scenario (state /local notification forms) against the actual forms and determine if the drill or exercise DEPopportunities (notification forms) were appropriately completed. Use guidance providedin NEI 99-02 and EP-AA-101-1000118 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationREVISION NO.: PROCEDURE TITLE: PAGE.'NUCLEAR DIVISION DRILL AND EXERCISE PROCEDURE 56 Of 101PROCEDURE NO.:EP-AA-101-1000 NUCLEAR FLEET ADMINISTRATIVEATTACHMENT 2TYPICAL FACILITY DRILL CRITIQUE PROCESS(Page 1 of 3)Facility Critique Process AgendaReview with the Facility lead by Facility Manager (or designee)* Importance for returning the facility to a state of readiness* Overview of the Critique Process* Importance of being Self Critical and Identify Issues* Importance of everyone being involved by providing written or verbalcritique comments* Assign a scribe to make sure comments are captured* Capture copies of all written material from facility (checklists, logs, faxes,etc.)* Review the Scenario with the Responders (may be performed by LeadController)Status of Risk Significant Planning Standards* Classification of Emergencies* Notification* Protective Action Recommendations* Accident AssessmentReview Performance for Strengths I Opportunities* Facility Leader / responder comments* Controller commentsStatus of Objectives* Command and Control* Facility activation* Onsite Protective Measures* Augmentation* Inter and Intra facility communications* Adequacy and Use of Procedures* Equipment* Human Performance Tools* Effectiveness of Critique* OtherSummary of Preliminary DEP (as appropriate)Management Observer and Oversight Commentslip UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationREVISION NO.: PROCEDURE TITLE: PAGE:9NUCLEAR DMSION DRILL AND EXERCISE PROCEDURE 57 of 101PROCEDURE NO-EP-AA-1101-1000 NUCLEAR FLEET ADMINISTRATIVEATTACHMENT 2TYPICAL FACIUTY DRILL CRmQUE PROCESS(Page 2 of 3)Critique Tool1 II 11 1I11 1i 1I11 11I1 IIIII1 II 1120 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationIC. Scenario Description and Timeline121 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationNARRATIVE SUMMARYThe plant is operating at 100% power, Middle of Life, equilibrium Xenon and Samarium.It is a Saturday morning. For Drill/Exercise purposes, it is Saturday, 11/05/14. Crew turnover is justcompleting in the Control Room. [RATIONALE: Seabrook Station has elected to establish off-shift hoursfor this Evaluated Exercise]METEOROLOGICAL DATA: It is a sunny day, with no rain or severe weather in the forecast. Windsdirection is from 225° at 7 mph, with ocassional gusts to 10 mph with an "D" Stability Class. Winddirection, speed, and stability class will remain constant throught the Exercise window.The Barometric Pressure is 30.2 and steady, with a Probability of Precipitation of <10%. Todays hightemperature will be 40' F, with a Low Temp of 23° F.Spent Fuel Pool time to reach 2000 F is 27.6 hours. (IER 11-2)EQUIPMENT OUT OF SERVICE: The Newington Line (369) is out of service for breaker replacement atNewington. Estimated time to completion is 3 days.EXPECTED ACTION: The Operational Plan is to maintain 100% Power.Scenario:Prior to T=O, Adversary Team #1 puts in at the Farm Lane boat launch in Seabrook. This is witnessed bya fisherman who is unable to report it until he gets back. The team meanders through the salt marshavoiding security detection.A van is observed parked on the North Access Road, when Security arrives to investigate the van isdriven to the 'A' parking lot, parked under the tower for the SCOBIE line and detonates an explosivedevice. This explosion damages the tower and removes this line from service leaving the WARD HILLline as the only offsite power supply.The explosion also injured the owner controlled area patrol that had followed the van, his exact statuswill remain unknown. This attack in the Owner Controlled Area will require Security to declare a CODERED condition and the declaration of an ALERT by the Control Room. The CODE RED declaration willresult in immediate notification of LLEAs.During this period adversary teams one and two are approaching the protected area. Commensuratewith the explosion in the parking lot, the adversary teams storm the protected area. Team oneapproaching from the southeast using hand carried bulk charges to explosively breach PA Gate 2 andgain entrance to the Protected Area.Team two initiates suppressive fire on the Defensive Positions in the SW corner of the PA whileexplosively breaching the SOCA & PA fence near thl2oling Tower. This team reaches the SEPS DieselGenerators and plants explosive devices on both SEPS-Diesel Generator Enclosures. The device on SEPS-UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationDG-2B does not activate during this scenario and the generator reamains functional. SEPS- DG-2A isdestroyed. Adversary Team 2 is neutralized by SFMs while attempting to make movement into theWaste Process Building.This attack on the protected area will require the declaration of a Site Area Emergency, since the attackin the Owner Controlled Area and the Protected area happen concurrently, the Site Area Emergencyshould be declared.The Control Room will implement OS1290.03, Response to a Security Event requiring a reactor trip andentry in E-0, Reactor Trip / Safety Injection.Team 1 proceeds to the Service Water Pump house (SWPH). While en route surrounding defensivepositions are targeted by rocket propelled grenade launchers (RPG). The CAS Operator receives reportof Security Force Member (SFMs) engagements from the SWPH prior to losing contact with the SFMs.The status of these Security Force Members is not immediately known. The adversary team gains accessto the SWPH through the East door.The ERO is activated per OS1290.03, Response to a Security Event. The ERO is directed to report toALTERNATIVE facilities.The adversaries in the SWPH detonate a large satchel charge in the SWPH, damaging SW piping. Theblast damage results in Service Water transferring to the cooling tower. When this transfer occurs theControl Room operators will note a lowering Cooling Tower level requiring them to secure the CoolingTower Pumps.A General Emergency will be declared.If Service Water Pumps are secured Primary Component Cooling Water temperature will slowly increaserequiring alternative cooling to components. The Control Room will consider aligning alternate coolingto the Coolant Charging Pump in order to maintain charging to the Reactor Coolant Pump Seals. Thiswill require Control Room-Security coordination for safe travel for an NSO to travel to the PrimaryAuxiliary Building.The damage to the B Train Service Water Piping is repairable, but this will not be known until teaminvestigates damage.The status of the adversaries in the SWPH will not be known until investigated.Law enforcement will form an Incident Command Post, with the Chief of Police for Seabrook, NH or hisdesignee as Incident Commander, from which to allocate the necessary resources and support tomitigate the Hostile Action event. As resources become available (EMS, fire, law enforcement teams,EOD, etc.), they will be simulated staged at a designated offsite staging area, in accordance with ICPdirection. They will be briefed on the physical and radiological hazards that may be present. ImmediatePlant needs of the ICP will be a perimeter sweep, e1alishment of perimeter control and access UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationrestrictions, EMS for the injured Security Force Members, and Explosives and Ordinates Disposal forundetonated explosives.After the adversaries are contained in the SWPH, Security will be able to support NSO alignment ofalternate cooling to the charging pump and other tasks the Control Room may require. At this point theICP should be coordinating sweeps of affected areas.It is at this time that explosion debris induced insulator damage results in the loss of the Ward Hill Line.This will result in a loss of offsite power. Prior to the loss of power SFM reports unusual arcing in the'high yard'. Both Diesel Generators will start, as will the 'B' SEPS Diesel Generator. The Control Room willfollow the guidance in E-O and recognize the lack of cooling water to the Diesel Generators. They willconsult with Engineering on a course of action, it is anticipated that the Diesel Generators will besecured. The '13' SEPs Diesel Generator is available to power bus 6.This loss of offsite power will require a General Emergency Declaration, but will not be declared as aGeneral Emergency is currently in effect.Security reports to the Control Room that all known adversaries have been neutralized. Security and theControl Room discuss the attack with law enforcement, including immediate needs and any radiationprotection requirements. Security will report that 3 SFMs are wounded. Control Room coordinates withSecurity and ICP to establish safe or protected route(s) of travel within and out of the PA for responseand support organizations such as EMS. Since all known adversaries are neutralized, the Control Roomwill also be coordinating with Security and LLEA for safe travel of Nuclear System Operators andavailable discipline personnel to investigate damage.The STED will turn over to the Site Emergency Director (SED), and the Alternative TSC, Alternative OSC,and EOF will be activated in accordance with Emergency Response procedure. For purposes of thisExercise, only designated personnel will respond. If this were an actual emergency, all ERO memberswould respond, and ongoing 24-hour ERO coverage would be established along with current facilityactivation. The Joint Information Center at the EOF will also be activated within this approximatetimeframe, though various PlOs may arrive sooner. The ERO will initiate coordination of repair teams tobe sent to site for assessment and eventual restoration of Service Water. Repair teams will be briefed,and their escorted/protected travel discussed and coordinated. However, repair teams will not actuallybe transported on site for this Exercise, only simulated.Repair teams will be briefed at the Alternative OSC, and their safe/protected travel to the plant will besimulated. Repair teams will be simulated to have arrived on site. Simulated assessments and successpaths will be communicated to the ERO via Drill Messages.Just prior to Exercise termination, it will be reported by repair teams that the B-Train Service Waterpiping has been repaired, and will be restored shortly. The Exercise will be terminated when theobjectives are satisfied or have had the opportunity to be satisfied.124 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEQUENCE OF EVENTS1.Van explodes in 'A' Lot, removing SCOBIE line from service2. Adversaries in Protected Area, plant explosives on SEPS Diesel Generators and Enter SWPH3. Explosion in SWPH, Service Water swaps to Cooling Tower, but unavailable4. Loss of offsite power, SEPS-DG-2B availableSHIFT TURNOVER INFORMATION125 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook Station11/5/14 0700-OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT TURNOVER9 Plant Status* Plant Is In Mode 1 At 100 % Power Protected Train* The Security Threat Level Is Yellow Current PRA Risk is GreenA Aggregate Risk is 6 LowReactivity* RCS Boron Concentration is 1058 ppm." Performing A 300 Gal Dilution Every 3 Hours." Rod Control Is In Auto With Control Bank "D" at 230 steps." RCS Tave Band (Deg. F): 589-589.3* Dilution Amount Required To Raise Tave By 1 Deg. F (Gal): 218* Boration Amount Required To Lower Tave By 1 Deg F (Gal): 38" SG Blowdown Lineup: Hotwells At 60 GPM/SG* Cation Run (Minutes): Mids-6 Days- 6 Cation Flowrate: Full Flow* Turbine Controls: Make adjustments as required to maintain the 8 Hour thermal power between 3646.0 MW and3647.9 MW. The 1 Hour thermal power average will be maintained below 3648 MW." Control Rods will be manipulated per Reactor Engineering recommendations and will normally be left in automaticcontrol. Utilize OS1000.10 Fig. 11, Rod Motion Checklist.* ODI 56 Values For NEPEX Contingency Downpower" Amount Of Boration Needed To Reduce Output To 1200 MWE Net (C6123) Is 124 Gal.* Amount Of Boration Needed To Reduce Output To 800 MWE Net (C6123) Is 694 Gal.11/5/14 0:00 *TURNOVER INFORMATION*By: rsm0m53 1. Discuss the expected amount and frequency of routine reactivity manipulations tomaintain steady state power operations.2. Discuss the attached Shift Reactivity Plan126 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationToday 06:35By:Today 06:35 *TURNOVER INFORMATION*By:Today 06:35 *TURNOVER INFORMATION*By:Today 06:35 *TURNOVER INFORMATION*By:Today 06:35 *TURNOVER INFORMATION*By:Today 06:35 *TURNOVER INFORMATION*By:Today 06:35 *TURNOVER INFORMATION*By:Today 06:35 *TURNOVER INFORMATION*By:Today 06:35 *TURNOVER INFORMATION*By:Today 06:35 *TURNOVER INFORMATION*By:.Comments, problems, operator workarounds, etc.127 DRILL SIMULATOR SCENARIO INSTRUCTIONS -CFE 14- 05IZ RESET Simulator to IC 30Ii SELECT: ScenarioD SELECT: EPSimulator Setup 11 SELECT: 1405 SetupE SELECT: RunLi Place Tag on MOD-3J-69 Newington line out of serviceD SELECT: ScenarioE SELECT: EPEl SELECT: 1405 Met DataD SELECT: RunVERIFY Simulator clock is synchronized with real time.OO [ SELECT: Scenario0741 D SELECT: EP Loss of Scobie line After explosionT=11 D SELECT: 1405 Loss of Scobie Control Room enters OS1210.05, Dropped Rod_ _ SELECT: RunD SELECT: Scenario0747 L SELECT: EPT=17 E SELECT: 1405 Loss of Ward HillE SELECT: Run0CmC*0C0CC0CCC-7J DRILL SIMULATOR SCENARIO INSTRUCTIONS -CFE 14- 05When required by Control Room Actions, swap CS-P-2B toalternate cooling:0904 0 SELECT:RF ListT4 SELECT:Primary Component Cooling Swaps CS-P-2B to Fire Protection.T4 SELECT: rfCC020, CS-P-2B ALTERNATE COOLING SOURCEE SELECT a Final Value of FP_ _ SELECT: InsertN)CoILIrC-8i UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationTimeline: CFE 14- 05INITIAL The plant is operating at 100% power, Middle of Life, equilibrium Xenon and Samarium.CONDITIONS:It is a Saturday morning. For Drill/Exercise purposes, it is Saturday, 11/05/14.Crew turnover has just completed in the Control Room.METEOROLOGICAL DATA: It is a sunny day, with no rain or severe weather in the forecast. Windsdirection is from 225' at 7 mph, with ocassional gusts tO 10 mph with an "D" Stability Class. Winddirection, speed, and stability class will remain constant throught the Exercise window.The Barometric Pressure is 30.2 and steady, with a Probability of Precipitation of <10%. Todays hightemperature will be 409 F, with a Low Temp of 23- F.Spent Fuel Pool time to reach 2000 F is 27.6 hours. (IER 11-2)EQUIPMENT OUT OF SERVICE: Newington Line (369) is out of service for breaker replacement atNewington. Estimated time to completion is 3 days.Risk is YELLOW.EXPECTED ACTION: The Operational Plan is to maintain 100% Power.Phone communications will be per ATT B-2 and mini scenario E.1.Security escorts will not be available for operations activitiies until directed by the Scenario (@T=36)CR LEAD Controller: Verify Simulator Initial Conditions Established.Message D.1 for ControlControllers provide Initial conditions personnel as they respond M, D.2 for ControlUponto theirassigned facilities Room, D.2 for Non-Controlto teir ssiged fciliiesRoom Personnel.130 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationT= Prior to DrillWindowAdversary Team #1 puts in at the Farm Lane boat launch in Seabrook. This is witnessed by afisherman who is unable to report it until he gets back. The team meanders through the salt marshavoiding security detection.ATTAC Phs 1 -30 misCR LEAD Controller:After board walkdown, the sequester the WCSoutside of the simulator.Sequester WCS outside ofsimulator for 3 mins afterany event is initiated whichwould require his return tothe control room.Ensure adequate delay onhis return.0730 TSC LEAD Controller: Ensure US announces drill start Message D.3Operations Crew takes the Shift in the Simulator Control Room. TheT=0 Security oncoming shift begins their morning briefing.-0730EXPECTED ACTION: None131 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationEVENT DESCRIPTION: Message D.4EVENT DESCRIPTION:Message D.4" Guard Island observes (via CCTV) a white van driving downthe North Access road and parking on the north side of theroad, east of the checkpoint.* Adversary Team 1 consisting of six individuals, has traversedthe marsh and is staged in the scaffold storage facility on thesoutheast side of the site near Gate 2." Adversary Team 2 consisting of three individuals, approachesthe protected area fence from the nature trail on the SW sideof the site using the marsh as cover.~0737DRILL MSG D.4: (This is a Drill Message.)CAS:"We picked up a white van speeding down the North Access roadbefore parking on the north side of the road, east of thecheckpoint."(This is a Drill Message.)EXPECTED ACTION(s):* Adversary team has not been detected by anyone -no action* Security Owner Controlled Area (OCA) Patrol dispatched toinvestigate van.132 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationT-10-0740EVENT DESCRIPTION:* As the OCA Patrol nears the van on the North Access Road,the van departs at a high rate of speed, heading east on thenorth access road. The OCA patrol gives chase and the vancomes stops in the east side of the "A" parking lot, north ofthe towers for the WARD HILL and SCOBIE lines.DRILL MSG D.5: (This is a Drill Message.)OCA: "CODE GRAY, the white van took off heading toward Alpha Lot.No license plates visible. Standby for further information."(This is a Drill Message.)DRILL MSG D.6: (This is a Drill Message.)OCA: "I have visual on white van. He's stopped by the VBS under thehighlines."(This is a Drill Message.)EXPECTED ACTION(s):* Adversary Team threat unkown -no action* Security declares a CODE Gray condition.Message D.5Message D.6133 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationTimeline: CFE 14- 05EVENT DESCRIPTION: Message D.7" As the OCA patrol arrives, the driver of the van detonates anexplosive device. The detonation is focused upwards,damaging the tower for the SCOBIE line,causing it to fall tothe north. The lines on this tower were severed in theexplosion. The explosion distributes a large amount of debristhroughout the parking lot and the HIGH YARD. There is alarge black cloud of smoke rising from the parking lot." The OCA patrol was severely injured in the explosion, unableT-11 to respond on the radio.~0741 DRILL MSG D.7: (This is a Drill Message.)Controller: "You hear/see a large explosion. OCA patrol appearsdamaged on camera and is non-responsive on radio."(This is a Drill Message.)EXPECTED ACTION(s):* Adversary Team has not been detected -no action" Security declares a CODE RED condition. CR/LLEA notified ofcode declaration as a result of a large explosion in the OCAnear the switchyard/VBS with the OCA patrol believed to bedisabled/neutralized.EVENT DESCRIPTION: LLEA Notificationa Notifies LLEA of AttackExpected Message: (This is a Drill Message.)CAS: "This is SGT Smith at Seabrook Station. A CODE RED hasbeen declared. We have a large vehicle explosion in theT~12 OCA near the switchyard. One of our OCA Patrols appears~0742 down."(This is a Drill Message.)EXPECTED ACTION(s):* LLEA NotificationObjective: Demonstrate the ability to make initial notifications to law enforcementand other first-responder agencies during a hostile action-based event.134 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationTimeline: CFE 14- 05EVENT DESCRIPTION: Control Room Notification CAS Controller:* Notifies the Control Room of Attack Ensure that X 2991 is used" CAS controller ensures that X2991 is used to reach the Unit for Unit Supervisor.SupervisorExpected Message: (This is a Drill Message.)T~13 CAS to CR: "Control Room, this is SGT Smith. A CODE RED has-0743 been declared. We have a large vehicle explosion inthe OCA near the switchyard. One of our OCA Patrolsappears down. LLEA has been notified." (This is aDrill Message.)EXPECTED ACTION(s):* Control Room NotificationEVENT DESCRIPTION: Control Room Response0 The Control Room implements OS1290.03 (Response to aSecurity Event), Trips the Reactor, Implements E -0 (ReactorTrip/Safety Injection).EXPECTED ACTION(s): The Control Room will:T~13 0 WCS will perform O51290.03 ATTACHMENT B, EMERGENCY~0743 PLAN ACTIVATION DURING CODE RED.* Stop RC-P-1D and 1B" Implement applicable emergency operating procedures(EOPs)* Notify Town of Seabrook Fire Dispatch that an attack isimminent or underway, and to be -ON STANDBY135 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationEVENT DESCRIPTION:Message D.8" Using the explosion as a diversion, Adversary teams 1 and 2initiate their assault on the Protected Area (PA).* Team 1 uses hand carried bulk charges to explosively breachPA Gate 2." Team 2 initiates suppressive fire on the Defensive Positionsin the S/SW corner of the PA while explosively breaching theSOCA & PA fence in the SW corner (Zones 801 & 16) near theT~14 Cooling Tower.~0744 DRILL MSG D.8: (This is a Drill Message.)Controller: "You simultaneously receive Intrusion alarms on Zones801, 16 and Gate 2". (This is a Drill Message.)EXPECTED ACTION(s):* Security maintains a CODE RED condition. SAS operatorprovides SALE report (size, activity, location, equipment)informing the Control Room of attacks." Control Room or Security notifies ICP of hostile actionoccurring at the SWPH.136 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationT-15-0745" Team 2 reaches the SEPS Diesel Generators and plantsexplosive devices on the SEPS DG fuel tanks.* Team 1 proceeds to the Service Water Pump house (SWPH).While en route the adversaries target surrounding defensivepositions utilizing rocket propelled grenade launchers (RPG).CAS Operator receives report of Security Force Member(SFMs) engagements from the SWPH prior to losing contactwith the SFMs. Shortly after, the CAS Operator receives anIntrusion alarm on SW100.DRILL MSG D.9: (This is a Drill Message.)SFM to CAS: "Multiple Adversaries in the area of Gate 2 and theCooling Tower. I'm receiving suppressive fire on myEast and West ports". Followed shortly by "RPGsimpacting the roof'. (This is a Drill Message.)DRILL MSG D.10: (This is a Drill Message.)Controller to CAS/SAS: "You receive Intrusion alarm on SWi100.".(This is a Drill Message.)EXPECTED ACTION(s):* Security maintains a CODE RED condition. SAS operatorprovides SALE report (size, activity, location, equipment)informing the Control Room of attacks and entry into SWPH.* Control Room or Security notifies ICP of hostile actionoccurring at the SWPH.Message D.9Message D.10137 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationDEP OpportunitySAECLASSIFICATIONHS4T 0745EVENT DESCRIPTION: Declaration of General Emergency" The Shift Manager may declare a SITE AREA EMERGENCY atthis time, based on HS4, Notification of HOSTILE ACTIONwithin the PROTECTED AREA as directed by 0S1290.03ATTACHMENT D, SITE AREA EMERGENCY ACTIONS DURINGCODE RED." The conditions are met for the ALERT and SAE ECLs at thesame time, only the SAE should be declared.Time RecognizedTime DeclaredEXPECTED ACTION: Site Area Emergency is Declared and actions ofOS1290.03 ATTACHMENT D, SITE AREAEMERGENCY ACTIONS DURING CODE RED areimplemented.Objective: Demonstrate the ability to implement the emergency plan during a HABevent.Objective: Demonstrate the ability to classify an emergency during a hostile baseddrill or exerciseObjective: Demonstrate the ability to recognize station conditions and parametertrends as emergency plan initiating conditions, and to developpotential solutions for placing the station in a safe, stable condition.138 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationEVENT DESCRIPTION: Unit Supervisor:EVENT DESCRIPTION:Unit Supervisor:The WCS makes the following announcement over the PA System, Message D.11and sounds the SPARE alarm: "This is a Drill Message. ATTENTIONALL PERSONNEL. A SECURITY EVENT IS IN PROGRESS. CLEAR ALLHALLWAYS AND STOP ALL MOVEMENT UNTIL ADVISED OTHERWISE.TURN OFF ALL RADIOS AND PLACE PAGERS TO VIBRATE MODE.TRESPASSERS MUST HALT IMMEDIATELY OR DEADL Y FORCE MAY BET-16 USED." This is a Drill Message (Announcement/alarm repeated.)~0746 EXPECTED ACTION(s):* The Control Room repeats the announcement over the publicaddress system.* All personnel on site clear hallways and stop movement andremain there until directed otherwise by Operations orSecurity.Objective: Demonstrate the ability to mobilize the station emergency responseorganization and activate station emergency response facilities in atimely manner.EVENT DESCRIPTION:* The WCS activates the ERO per OS1290.03 ATTACHMENT B,T-16 EMERGENCY PLAN ACTIVATION DURING CODE RED.-0746 Objective: Demonstrate the ability to mobilize the station emergency responseorganization and activate station emergency response facilities in atimely manner.139 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationEVENT DESCRIPTION: Message D.12EVENT DESCRIPTION:Message D.12" SFMs report explosions occurring at SEPS Diesel Generators,sending a large cloud of black smoke into the air. (SEPS-DG-2A is destroyed, SEPS-DG-2B remains undamaged)* Adversary Team 2 is neutralized by SFMs while attempting tomake movement into the Waste Process Building.T~17 DRILL MSG D.12: (This is a Drill Message.)~0747 SFM: "Multiple Adversaries in the area of the Cooling Towerneutralized crossing the 50 yard line. There was an explosionnear the SEPS and I see black smoke & fire. ". (This is a DrillMessage.)EXPECTED ACTION(s):Alarm Station Operator expected to report explosions in thearea of the Cooling Tower before reporting adversaryneutralization in the area of WPB..140 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Inprovement PlanSeabrook StationTimeline: CFE 14- 05EVENT DESCRIPTION:Message D.13* SFMs report a large explosion in SWPH with light smokecoming out of the building." Adversary team I detonates a large satchel charge in theSWPH, damaging SW piping.DRILL MSG D.13: (This is a Drill Message.)SFM: "We have explosions occurring inside the SWPH. ". (This is aDrill Message.)* Both Trains of SW swap to the cooling tower due to lowservice water pump discharge pressure. This results in thecooling tower being pumped to the service water pumphouse. This condition will result in rising PCCW temperaturesand lowering cooling tower level. This will drive the ControlRoom to secure all service water pumps to maintain coolingT-17tower inventory.'0747* A Train SW piping is severely damaged and will requireextensive repair. B Train SW piping has a large hole, that canbe repaired." The loss of service water will necessitate shutting downequipment as Service Water and PCCW Temperatures rise.EXPECTED ACTION(s):* SAS notifies Control Room of explosion.* Control Room Implements OS1216.01, Degraded UltimateHeat Sink and OS1212.01, PCCW SYSTEM MALFUNCTION." Drive actions to align alternate cooling to charging pump lubeoil cooler per OS1002.02, OPERATION OF LETDOWN,CHARGING AND SEAL INJECTION.* Control Room will secure all Service Water and CoolingTower Pumps resulting in loss of cooling to PCCW.141 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationEVENT DESCRIPTION: Message D.14a SFMs monitor SWPH.DRILL MSG D.14: (This is a Drill Message.)T-18SFM: "We have observation of SW. No activity.". (This is a DrillMessage.)EXPECTED ACTION(s):0 SFMs maintain observation of SWPH.EVENT DESCRIPTION: Message D.15* The WCS performs an accelerated notification to the NRCT-18 Operations Center, per OS1290.03 ATTACHMENT B~0748Objective: Demonstrate the ability to communicate threat-related information tothe NRC during a hostile action-based event.Perf Crit.: Perform accelerated notification to the NRC in accordance withappropriate proceduresEVENT DESCRIPTION: LLEA arriving on site reports arcing in the high Message D.16yard on the Southern line.DRILL MSG D.16: (This is a Drill Message.)T~18 SFM to CAS: "There is a large amount of arcing on the insulators in-0748 the high yard for the Southern line". (This is a Drill Message.)EXPECTED ACTION:* Security reports to Control Room arcing on the northern 345 kvline.142 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationTimeline- CFE 14- 05DEP OpportunityGECLASSIFICATIONHG1 (HG2)T ~18~0748EVENT DESCRIPTION: Declaration of General Emergency* The Shift Manager may declare a General Emergency at thistime, based on HG1, Security Event Resulting In Loss ofPhysical Control as directed by OS1290.03 ATTACHMENT E,GENERAL EMERGENCY ACTIONS DURING CODE RED." This classification is based upon loss of physical control of thefacility, which may not be recongized at this time." This classification may also be based on the Judgement of theSTED/SED.Time RecognizedTime DeclaredEXPECTED ACTION: General Emergency is Declared and actions of0S1290.03 ATTACHMENT E, GENERALEMERGENCY ACTIONS DURING CODE RED areimplemented.Objective: Demonstrate the ability to implement the emergency plan during a HABevent.Objective: Demonstrate the ability to classify an emergency during a hostile baseddrill or exerciseObjective: Demonstrate the ability to recognize station conditions and parametertrends as emergency plan initiating conditions, and to developpotential solutions for placing the station in a safe, stable condition.+T 0758CR Lead Controller: If no emergency declaration has been made ANDis not pending, the Shift Manager will be directed to declare aGeneral Emergency based on HG1.Contingency time is based on 15 minutes from the notification ofHOSTILE ACTION within the protected area.Message D.17I INTIA SWEP PASE(3060 in)EVENT DESCRIPTION: PAR Identification0 Control Room identifies PARs for EPZ.T ~30EXPECTED ACTION(s):"0800* Control Room correctly identifies PAR Group A, winddirection from 168 -281.4.143 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationEVENT DESCRIPTION: Recommendation to Implement KI plans forthe general public (and emergency workers)T -30EXPECTED ACTION(s):"08000 Control Room correctly identifies the recommendation toImplement KI plans for the general public.EVENT DESCRIPTION:T -30 a Security Officers surround SWPH.~0800 EXPECTED ACTION(s):* Security officers maintain perimeter on SWPH.EVENT DESCRIPTION: Data ValidationVerify Notification was made within 15 minutesE-Yes El NoDeclaration Time:Notification Time:EVENT DESCRIPTION: Security reports that all known adversaries Message D.18have been neutralized or contained in Service Water Pumphouse.DRILL MSG D.18: (This is a Drill Message.)Controller: "Seven total adversaries confirmed neutralized two arecontained in the SWPH at this time. Status unknown. We have 2T ~35 wounded Security Force Member in need of immediate medicalattention on the roof. ". (This is a Drill Message.)"0805EXPECTED ACTION:* Security reports to Control Room and ICP that all knownadversaries neutralized or contained in the SWPH." SFMs maintain a 360'watch from their firing positions.* Security coordinates with Control Room and ICP to preservethe crime scene to the extent possible.144 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationTimeline: CFE 14- 05EVENT DESCRIPTION: A SBK resident makes report to Seabrook PD, Message D.19noted that when he was leaving for fishing this morning a group ofmen were leaving from the Farm Lane Boat launch in two boats.They had guns and packs with them.DRILL MSG D.19: (This is a Drill Message.)Controller: "Person called Seabrook Police, reported that when heT-35 was leaving for fishing this morning a group of men were leaving0805 from the Farm Lane Boat launch in two boats. They had guns andpacks with them. One of their vehicles is still there. ". (This is a DrillMessage.)EXPECTED ACTIONS:o Incident Commander:o Incident Commander coordinates the necessary support toinvestigate this report.EVENT DESCRIPTION: Security, with input from the Control Room,discusses the attack with ICP. Immediate needs and radiationprotection requirements are reviewed with Incident Commander.EXPECTED ACTIONS:* Security:o Maintains onsite protective measures (cover).o Requests LLEA sweep of Owner Controlled Area.o Requests medical care for 3 wounded SFMs, 2 of whichT-36 require immediate medical attention.-0806 o Coordinates perimeter control and site access restrictions withLLEA.o Requests Explosives and Ordinates Disposal (EOD) Team tomitigate undetonated explosives that may have been leftbehind in areas traversed by adversaries.* Control Room:o Requests EMS for injured personnel.o Requests Fire Response for SEPS DGo Requests Security support to enable safe limited movementfor assessments of plant damal4prznd with associated HealthPhysics support. UnclassifiedRadiologica] Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook Stationo May discuss possible establishment of fire service watercooling to charging pump lube oil cooler.* Incident Commander:o Incident Commander and Security coordinate the necessarysupport.Objective: Demonstrate the ability of on-shift Operations and Security personnelto coordinate response actions among themselves, and with theIncident Commander and local law enforcement agency (LLEA)personnel.Objective: Demonstrate the ability of on-shift Operations and Security personnelto coordinate with the Incident Commander for deployment of on-siteand offsite first-responders in a post-attack environmentEVENT DESCRIPTION: Security Support of NSO movement to PAB* At this time Security can support movement of NSO to PAB toT-36 align cooling for CS-P-2B.EXPECTED ACTION:* SFM escort or safe travel path provided to NSO by Security.EVENT DESCRIPTION: Security reports arcing in the high yard on the Message D.20Southern line.DRILL MSG D.20: (This is a Drill Message.)T~40 SFM to CAS: " There is a large amount of arcing on the insulators in-0810 the high yard". (This is a Drill Message.)EXPECTED ACTION:9 Security reports to Control Room arcing on the northern 345 kvline.146 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationEVENT DESCRIPTION: ERDS will be activated as directed byOS1290.03.EXPECTED ACTION: The Control Room activates ERDS using aT -40 computer monitor in accordance withOS1290.03."0810Time ERDS is activated:Objective: Demonstrate the ability to perform timely and accurateNRC notification.EVENT DESCRIPTION: State NotificationEXPECTED ACTION:0 The WCS develops notifies the states within 15 minutes ofDECLARATION per OS1290.03.DEP OpportunityGE / SAE 0 This notification is based upon T=O for the SAE.NOTIFICATION (Per ER 1.2, Notification should be made of the higher level ECL)HG1 / HS4 (NEI) Record time of contact with first state:T-43 (NRC) Record time both states have been notified:-0805Objective: Demonstrate the ability to notify offsite response agencies during ahostile based drill or exercise.Objective: Demonstrate the ability to make a protective action recommendationoffsite during a hostile based drill or exerciseEVENT DESCRIPTION: NRC Notification.EXPECTED ACTION: NRC headquarters operations center is notifiedT -45 per OS1290.03.-0815 Time NRC is notified:Objective: Demonstrate the ability to communicate threat-related information tothe NRC during a hostile action-based event.147 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationT-50-0820EVENT DESCRIPTION: Loss of Offsite Power* Due to debris from prior explosion damaging insulator in highyard, the Ward Hill line (394) trips on line faults. Resulting inloss of offsite power.* Both Diesel Generator Start and load Buses 5 & 6* SEPS 2A is unavailable, SEPS DG-2B starts.EXPECTED ACTION(s):Control Room Implements actions in E.0 to restore power toemergency busses from an offsite source.T-51-0821EVENT DESCRIPTION: Control Room Considerations* Diesel Generators will be running without cooling water. Thiscondition is not described by station procedures and willrequire Engineering input in order to plan Diesel Generatoruse.* High Temperature alarms will be actuated if running withoutfull cooling.EXPECTED ACTION(s):* Control Room Requests guidance on use of DieselGenerators.EVENT DESCRIPTION: Align Alternate Cooling to Charging Pump 2B* Diesel Generators will be running without cooling water. Thiscondition is not described by station procedures and willWhen requested require Engineering input in order to plan Diesel Generatorand support ueuse.available.EXPECTED ACTION(s):* Control Room Requests guidance on use of DieselGenerators.148 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationTimeline: CFE 14- 05T-55-0825EVENT DESCRIPTION: Offsite first responders continue staging (atStaging Area), awaiting additional response direction from ICP.EXPECTED ACTION:" ICP continues discussion and decision-making necessary to supportdeployment of offsite response assets and ERO movement andmobilization." LLEA continues initial sweep of Owner Controlled Area." Security continues initial sweep of PA and OCA, and coordination oflimited movement within PA.ER MOIIZTO PHS (36 min)DEP OpportunityGECLASSIFICATIONSG1T ~58(when applicable)~0828EVENT DESCRIPTION: Declaration of General Emergency" IF diesel generators are secured with a loss of offsite power,the Shift Manager will declare a General Emergency, basedon SG1, Prolonged loss of both AC emergency buses.* This classification will not be made if GE declared under HG1.Time RecognizedTime DeclaredEXPECTED ACTION: General Emergency is Declared and actions ofOS1290.03 ATTACHMENT E, GENERALEMERGENCY ACTIONS DURING CODE RED areimplemented.Objective: Demonstrate the ability to implement the emergency plan during a HABevent.Objective: Demonstrate the ability to classify an emergency during a hostile baseddrill or exerciseObjective: Demonstrate the ability to recognize station conditions and parametertrends as emergency plan initiating conditions, and to developpotential solutions for placing the station in a safe, stable condition.149 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationTimeline: CFE 14- 05EVENT DESCRIPTION: State NotificationEXPECTED ACTION:* The WCS develops notifies the states within 15 minutes ofDECLARATION per OS1290.03.DEP Opportunity 0 This notification is based upon T=0 for the Loss of AC power.GEN Notification not required if GE not declared.NOTIFICATIONSG1 / HS4 (NEI) Record time of contact with first state:T -15 min afterdeclaration (NRC) Record time both states have been notified:Objective: Demonstrate the ability to notify offsite response agencies during ahostile based drill or exercise.Objective: Demonstrate the ability to make a protective action recommendationoffsite during a hostile based drill or exerciseEVENT DESCRIPTION: LLEA coordinates with Security on safetravel paths to/from the PA. LLEA Coordinates with Security ontacking back SWPH.EXPECTED ACTION:* Security maintains onsite protective measures (cover)." Security coordinates with LLEA Tactical Units on course of action todeal with barricaded adversaries (2) in SWPH." LLEA investigative branch works on developing leads in reference tothe SBK resident report of suspicious activities observed earlier inthe day.T~60 9 Security establishes safe and/or protected areas and routes to/from-0830 PA for necessary troubleshooting and repair activities." Safe and/or protected routes of travel have been established out ofthe PA and OCA by Security and LLEA to enable PA evacuation andaccountability." Coordination of EMS for wounded SFMs, FBI/crime sceneinvestigation, and EOD for undetonated explosives.Objective: Demonstrate the ability of the Emergency Response Organization (ERO)to coordinate in-plant and on-site response actions with Security andthe Incident Command Post (ICP).Objective: As appropriate to the scenario, coordinate deployment of fire andmedical response resources between the ICP, on-site ERO facilities, andSecurity. 150 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationEVENT DESCRIPTION: The SED (ERO still forming at EOF), in concertwith the STED, Security, and the ICP, will likely be coordinating withOperations and Maintenance personnel to conduct an initialinvestigation of damaged plant equipment and render opinions on itsT~70 repair. But it is anticipated that the ERO will coordinate repair teams~0840 from the Alternative OSC for the major equipment repair operations.EXPECTED ACTION:Onsite Operations and Maintenance personnel should communicate theneed for REPAIR TEAMS to Control Room, who relays the need to availableERO facilities and ICP.151 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationEVENT DESCRIPTION: The STED turns over to the SED, and the ATSC,AOSC, and EOF are fully staffed and activated, lAW ER 3.1, ER 3.2, ERand 3.3. (NOTE: For purposes of this Exercise, designated personnelwill respond. If this were an actual emergency, all available EROpersonnel would respond, and ongoing 24-hour ERO coverage wouldbe established along with current facility activation.)Alternative TSC activated:Alternative OSC activated:EOF activated:EXPECTED ACTION:T~71

• Communication established between EOF, TSC, ICP, and CR.-0841 a ERO members initiate applicable portions of applicable ERprocedures:o The SED is in charge of overall emergency response.o SED contacts Control Room and receive report onplant and personnel conditions.o EOF assumes communications from Control Room assoon as possible.o TSC will designate a Site Emergency Director as theOperations Liaison to the SCC and the OSC willdesignate an available RP tech as the SCC Liaison.After being briefed, they will be dispatched to theICP.Objective: Demonstrate the ability of the Emergency Response Organization (ERO)to support operation of an Incident Command Post (ICP).Objective: Demonstrate the ability of the ERO to activate alternative facilities152 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improverment PlanSeabrook StationEVENT DESCRIPTION: The JIC is staffed and activated at the EOF,lAW ER 3.5.JIC activated:EXPECTED ACTION:T-71-0O841" State, federal, and company PIOs arrive and integrate into JICoperations." Press releases are accurate, and are vetted for sensitive andsafeguards information prior issuance.* Media line updated appropriate to available information.* Joint Information Center will designate an SCC Liaison. Afterbeing briefed, they will be dispatched to the ICP.Objective: Demonstrate the ability of the ERO to coordinate the development andrelease of public information in a post-attack environment.EVENT DESCRIPTION: Radiation Protection measures determinedbetween ERO, HP, and ICP, with assistance of state agencies.T-90
• Dosimetry provided by the State of New Hampshire to ORO at~0900 staging area.* Dosimetry provided by Seabrook Station to ICP.Objective: Demonstrate the ability to coordinate implementation of on-siteradiation protection measures for offsite first-responders with the ICP.EVENT DESCRIPTION: Security completes PA accountability, andpresents it to Control Room.EXPECTED ACTION:" Personnel Search and Rescue will be initiated when possible of anymissing PA personnel. Scenario does not include any missing personnel.T~9S* Security is maintaining safe cordons for personnel to exit and travel within~0905 the PA." LLEA is ensuring safe passage on the South Access Road and via trafficcontrol points to the staging area." Non-essentials will remain at the Offsite Holding Area until released byFBI/LLEA.Objective: Demonstrate the ability to account for on-site personnel in a post-attack environment. 1 53 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Inmprovement PlanSeabrook StationEVENT DESCRIPTION: ICP executes plan to extract barricadedsubjects in SWPH.T-95 EXPECTED ACTION:~0905 ICP will coordinate with LLEA to extract / neutralize adversaries inSWPH. The Control Room should impress upon the ICP the need toevaluate the status of Service Water in order to restore ServiceT~100 EVENT DESCRIPTION: First New Briefing Message D.22-0910 During first News Briefing, ask questions in MessageT-100 EVENT DESCRIPTION: Requested offsite first responders (EMS, EOD,etc.) enter PA and commence operations under the direction ofSecurity and the ICP.EVENT DESCRIPTION: REPAIR TEAMS are briefed at AOSC, and beginT~130 escorted/protected travel to plant.-0940 Objective: Demonstrate the ability to coordinate mobilization of the EmergencyResponse Organization (ERO) with Security and the ICP.T-150 EVENT DESCRIPTION: EOD completes initial sweep of the PA near-1000 gate 2 through SWPH to detect explosive ordinance.EVENT DESCRIPTION: Crime scene team(s) continue to coordinateT,160 with EMS, Fire, and Security to gain access to the crime scene. Crimescene investigators conduct investigation in the PA. This consists ofcollecting evidence prior to allowing repair team activity at theSWPH.EVENT DESCRIPTION: Repair Teams arrive on site, where safe travelhas been coordinated to SEPS and SWPH (if/when verified no hazarddue to undetonated explosives). They make their assessments, andT~160 begin to formulate success paths to respective equipment~1010 restoration.EXPECTED ACTION:* Maintenance welding of eventual B Train Service Water piping repair willgoverned by work order.EVENT DESCRIPTION: Service Water Pump House Repair TeamT~195 reports that repair to the A Train Serv-Water piping will take at-1035 least a week, and B-Service Water train can be restored with within12 hrs.

UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationTimeline. CFE 14- 05EVENT DESCRIPTION: Exercise is terminated when objectives are Message D.23T~200 satisfied. Message D.24~1040 EXPECTED ACTION: Termination message is sent to the State andcounties.155 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationTimeline: CFE 14- 05I UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook Station157 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSeabrook Station State Notification Fact SheetTime Notification Initiated: NH 0744 -0813 MA 0744 -0813Block 1: This is:NameWCSTitleat Seabrook Station.NameBlock 2: Time Declared: I I Unusual Eventf I Alert0743 -0758 IX] Site Area Emergency:[ ] General EmergencyORITime Terminated:1 DP E.B SAE-Block 3: The emergency initiating condition is HS4Block 4: We recommend the following protective actions:[ I None[X] As followsNew HampshireERPA TownMassachusettsERPA TownShelter EvacuateShelter EvacuateA. SeabrookHampton FallsIIIl1]B. AmesburySalisbury[I I1[ l IC. Kensington I l I 1S. Hampton I ID. Hampton [ I I IN. Hampton [ ] [ IF. Brentwood I IE. Kingston I IExeter [ [Newfields [ ]Newton [ [Kingston [ [E. Merrimac [ lNewburyport [ I [ INewbury I ] [ lWest Newbury [ I lBeachesEvacuateI I Seabrook Beach[ ] Hampton BeachCloseII11Parker River National Wildlife RefugePlum Island BeachSalisbury BeachG. GreenlandStrathamRyeNew CastlePortsmouth[IIll]l1ll[1IIII IIII1[XJIIIIPotassium Iodide (General Emergency only)[ I Implement KI plans for the general publicBlock 5: A radiological releaseHas not occurredHas occurred and is continuingOccurred but has been terminatedBlock 6: Authorized by:,..Nameq VSED / RM11/5/14Date0743-0800TimeBlock 7: Acknowledge receipt of this message with your name.New Hampshire: New HarName of DisTime Notification Initiated: NHrpshire Massachusetts: Massachusetts)atcher Name of Dispatcher0744-o08118 MA 0744-0813ER 2.OBRev. 31Pane 1 of 1 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSeabrook Station State Notification Fact SheetBlock 1: This is:NameNameWCsTitleat Seabrook Station.Block 2: Time Declared: [ ] Unusual Event[ ] Alert OR0743 -0758 1 Site Area Emergency:IX] General EmergencyBlock 3: The emergency initiating condition is HG1 (HG2)Time Terminated:=DE E2.B GEBlock 4: We recommend the following protective actions:II NoneIX] As followsNew HampshireERPA TownMassachusettsERPA TownShelter EvacuateShelter EvacuateA. SeabrookHampton FallsII[IIXlIXB. AmesburySalisburyIXl[xI[!IIC. Kensington [XJ I IS. Hampton IX] I ID. Hampton I I [XIN. Hampton I I IX]F. Brentwood IX] I IE. Kingston IX] IExeter [X I[Newfields IX] I INewton [X] I IKingston [X] IE. Merrimac [X] I INewburyport [X] I INewbury [X] I IWest Newbury IX] IBeachesEvacuateIX] Seabrook Beach[X] Hampton BeachCloseIX]IX][XIParker River National Wildlife RefugePlum Island BeachSalisbury BeachG. GreenlandStrathamRyeNew CastlePortsmouthIX]lXI[XlIX]IlX[[I[!1111IPotassium Iodide (General Emergency only)[X] Implement KI plans for the general publicBlock 5: A radiological releaseIX]I II]Has not occurredHas occurred and is continuingOccurred but has been terminatedBlock 6: Authorized by:,NameDSED / R11/5/14Date0743-0800TimeBlock 7: Acknowledge receipt of this message with your name.New Hampshire:New HampshireName of DispatcherMassachusetts:MassachusettsName of Dispatcher159ER 2.OBRev. 31Pane 1 of 1 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationD. Messages160 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/lmprovement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: Control Room PersonnelFROM: Drill ManagerMESSAGE NO.: D.1TIME: ~0730LOCATION: Simulator Control RoomTHIS IS A DRILLThe drill date is simulated as Saturday, November 5, 2014.On-site personnel are limited to the normal weekday compliment. Current reactor power is 100%.Reactor core power history since the completion of OR-15 is Average Burnup = 10,000 MWD/MTUand Effective Full Power Days = 257. All plant parameters are normal except for those identifiedbelow.THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION161D-1I UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: Non-Control Room PersonnelMESSAGE NO.: D.2TIME: Upon ArrivalFROM: Drill ManagerLOCATION: Emergency Response FacilitiesTHIS IS A DRILLThe drill date is simulated as Saturda, November 5, 2014.On-site personnel are limited to the normal weekday compliment. Current reactor power is 100%.Reactor core power history since the completion of OR-15 is Average Burnup = 10,000 MWD/MTUand Effective Full Power Days = 257. All plant parameters are normal except for those identifiedbelow.THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION162D-2I UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: Plant Unit Supervisor (CR)FROM: CR Lead ControllerLOCATION: CRMESSAGE NO.: D.3TIME: 0730THIS IS A DRILLMESSAGE:Notify Site personnel as follows:a. Ensure Gaitronics night muting is off.b. Using the Gaitronics override, make the following announcement:"ATTENTION ALL PERSONNEL. AN EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATIONDRILL HAS COMMENCED. NON-PARTICIPANT PERSONNEL DISREGARD ALLDRILL RELATED ALARMS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS."c. Using the Gaitronics override, repeat the announcement.THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATIONI163D-3 J UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014MESSAGE NO.: D.4TO: CASFROM: Guard IslandTIME: -0737LOCATION: CAS___THIS IS A DRILLMESSAGE:We picked up a white van speeding down the North Access road before parking on the north side ofthe road, east of the checkpoint.THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION164D-4I UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: Central Alarm StationMESSAGE NO.: D.5FROM: OCA PatrolLOCATION: CASTIME: --0740THIS IS A DRILLMESSAGE:CODE GRAY, the white van took off heading toward Alpha Lot. No licenseplates visible. Standby for further information.THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION165D-5I UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: Central Alarm StationFROM: OCA PatrolLOCATION: CASMESSAGE NO.: D.6TIME: -0740THIS IS A DRILLMESSAGE:I have visual on white van. He's stopped by the VBS under the highlines.THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION166D-6 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: CAS OperatorFROM: CAS ControllerLOCATION: CASMESSAGE NO.: D.7TIME: -0741THIS IS A DRILLMESSAGE:You hear/see a large explosion. OCA patrol appears damaged on camera andis non-responsive on radioTHIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION167D-7I UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014MESSAGE NO.: D.8TIME: -0744TO: CAS / SASFROM: CAS ControllerLOCATION: SimulatorTHIS IS A DRILLMESSAGE:You simultaneously receive Intrusion alarms on Zones 801, 16 and Gate 2.THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATIONf168D-81 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14-05 November 5, 2014TO: CAS / SASMESSAGE NO.: D.9FROM: SFMLOCATION: CAS/SASTIME:-0745THIS IS A DRILLMESSAGE:"Multiple Adversaries in the area of Gate 2 and the Cooling Tower. I'm receivingsuppressive fire on my East and West ports."after a few seconds report the following:"RPGs impacting the roof."THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION169D-9 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: CAS/SASMESSAGE NO.: D.10TIME: -0745FROM: CAS ControllerLOCATION: CASTHIS IS A DRILLMESSAGE:You receive Intrusion alarm on SW100.THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION170D-10I UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: Plant Unit Supervisor (CR)FROM: Drill ManagerLOCATION: CR (Sim)MESSAGE NO.: D.11TIME:-0746L ITHIS IS A DRILLLNotify Site personnel as follows:a.b.C.d.Ensure Gaitronics night muting is off.Place telephone page lockout to ONSound the Plant Security Alarm by pressing the button for the Spare Alarm.Using the Gaitronics override, make the following announcement:THIS IS A DRILL MESSAGE"ATTENTION ALL PERSONNEL. A SECURITY EVENT IS IN PROGRESS. CLEAR ALL HALLWAYSAND STOP ALL MOVEMENT UNTIL ADVISED OTHERWISE. TURN OFF ALL RADIOS ANDPLACE PAGERS TO VIBRATE MODE. TRESPASSERS MUST HALT IMMEDIATELY OR DEADLYFORCE MAY BE USED."THIS IS A DRILL MESSAGEe. Repeat the Plant Security Alarm.f. Repeat the Gaitronics announcement.THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION171D-11J. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014MESSAGE NO.: D.12TO: CAS / SASFROM: SFMLOCATION: CASTIME: -0747THIS IS A DRILLMESSAGE:Multiple Adversaries in the area of the Cooling Tower neutralized crossing the 50yard line. There was an explosion near the SEPS generators and I see blacksmoke & fire.THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION172D-12I UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: CAS/SASMESSAGE NO.: D.13TIME: -0747FROM: CAS ControllerLOCATION: CASTHIS IS A DRILL"We have explosions occurring inside the SWPH."THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION173D-13I UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: CAS / SASFROM: SFMLOCATION: CASMESSAGE NO.: D.14TIME: -0O748THIS IS A DRILLMESSAGE:We have observation of SW. No activity.THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION174D°-14 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvernent Plan Seabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: WCS MESSAGE NO: D.1SFROM: CR Controller TIME: ~0748LOCATION: SimulatorTHIS IS A DRILLMESSAGE:Perform accelerated NRC Notification using the FTS handset phone. IF thisphone is not operable, THEN use a commercial line. The numbers below can beused for either phone* 1-(301) 816-5100 (Primary)-OR-.1-(301) 951-0550 (Back-Up)1) When the NRC Headquarters Operations Officer (HOO) answers the phone,announce the following:-This is (name) calling from Seabrook Station notifyingthe NRC of an onsite security threat.* The authentication code is (daily code).2) Upon NRC confirmation of the authentication code, provide the followinginformation:" If determined, state the emergency classification,* Brief description of the nature of the threat,ED Type of threat/attackEl Threat/attack status (i.e., himinent, in progress, repelled)THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION175D-15J UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: CAS/SASMESSAGE NO: D.16TIME: ~0810FROM: LLEALOCATION: CAS/SASTHIS IS A DRILLMESSAGE:There is a large amount of arcing on the insulators in the high yard for theSouthern line.THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION176D-16I UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: Control Room and TSCFROM: CR Controller / TSC controllerLOCATION: Control Room / TSCMESSAGE NO:D.17TIME:~0758THIS IS A DRILLInform the Facility Lead Controller and Drill Manager if this message is passed.Deliver the following message if a General Emergency has not been declared by this time.T-0 time starts when explosions reported in SWPH.MESSAGE:Declare a General Emergency at this time in accordance with OS1290.03, Response To Security Event.Initiating Condition is HG1, Security Event Resulting In Loss Of Physical Control Of The Facility.THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION177D-17 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: Control Room / SCCFROM: SCC Security LeadLOCATION: SCCMESSAGE NO: D.18TIME: -0805MTHIS IS A DRILLMESSAGE:Seven total adversaries confirmed neutralized two are contained in the SWPH at thistime. Status unknown. We have 2 wounded Security Force Member in need immediatemedical attention on the roof.THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION178D-18I UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/linprovement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: Seabrook Police Rep at ICPMESSAGE NO.: D.19FROM: ICP ControllerLOCATION: ICPTIME: '0805THIS IS A DRILLMESSAGE:Person called Seabrook Police, reported that when he was leaving for fishing thismorning a group of men were leaving from the Farm Lane Boat launch in two boats.They had guns and packs with them. One of their vehicles is still there.rigure u-i -rarmers Lane aoaz LauncnTHIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION179D-19 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION180D-20I UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: CAS/SASMESSAGE NO: D.20TIME: -0810FROM: SFMLOCATION: CAS/SASTHIS IS A DRILLMESSAGE:There is a large amount of arcing on the insulators in the high yard for theSouthern line.THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION181D-211 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: Shift Manager MESSAGE NO: D.21FROM: Control Room Lead Controller TIME: "0748LOCATION: Simulator Control RoomTHIS IS A DRILLWhen notified that a General Emergency has been declared, notify the Unit Supervisor to deliver thefollowing message.MESSAGE:Notify Site personnel as follows:a. Ensure Gaitronics night muting is off.b. Sound the plant emergency alarm.c. Using the Gaitronics override, make the following announcement:THIS IS A DRILL MESSAGE"ATTENTION ALL PERSONNEL. A GENERAL EMERGENCY HAS BEEN DECLARED.ALL PERSONNEL WITH GENERAL EMERGENCY DUTIES REPORT TO YOURASSIGNED LOCATIONS. ALL NON-ASSIGNED PERSONNEL EVACUATE THE SITETO YOUR HOME."THIS IS A DRILL MESSAGEd. Repeat the plant emergency alarm.e. Using the Gaitronics override, repeat the announcement.THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION182D-22) UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: Shift ManagerFROM: Control Room Lead ControllerLOCATION: Simulator Control RoomMESSAGE NO: D.22TIME: ~0910THIS IS A DRILLAs News Media, ask the following questions during the briefing;The black smoke that is blowing thoroughout the area, is that burning radioactive material?What is FEMA's role in the response to these events?If PARs have been issued by this time ask why it was recommended to issue KI?THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION183D-23 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: All Drill ParticipantsFROM: Drill ControllersLOCATION: All FacilitiesMESSAGE NO: D.23TIME: When DirectedTHIS IS A DRILLMESSAGE:DRILL ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN TERMINATEDA post-drill critique of facility performance will begin in approximately 20 minutes. This critique will be facilitated by theFacility Lead Controller. You should complete the following actions prior to the start of the critique.1. Restore your work area to the original state of readiness.2. Save ALL materials for review.3. Conduct a self-critique with the other players in your functional/work area. Refer to the Drill/Exercise CritiqueReview Points handout for topics to consider.4. Each functional area should designate a spokesperson to present the self-critique results during the facility critique.5. Controllers will caucus in a separate area and summarize their observations. Keep this meeting brief and focus onthe more significant issues.As directed by the Lead Controller, the designated spokespersons will present the self-critique comments for eachfunctional/work area. Other players may offer comments after the spokesperson is done.Controllers will give their comments following the players.Document drill comments on EP-AA-101-1000-F03, Typical Drill / Exercise Comment Form, and provide the completedform to a controller.THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION184D-24 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONCONTROLLER MESSAGECFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014TO: Plant Unit Supervisor (CR)FROM: TSC Lead ControllerLOCATION: CRMESSAGE NO.: D.24TIME:: -1430THIS IS A DRILLMESSAGE:Notify Site personnel as follows:a. Ensure Gaitronics night muting is off.b. Using the Gaitronics override, make the following announcement:"ATTENTION ALL PERSONNEL. THE EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION DRILL HAS BEENTERMINATED. REGARD ALL FURTHER ALARMS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS."c. Using the Gaitronics override, repeat the announcement.THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION185D-25 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationE. Mini-Scenarios186 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONMINI-SCENARIOCFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014MINI-SCENARIO E.1 Page 1 of 4CONTROL CELL INSTRUCTIONS FOR EXTERNAL ERO INTERFACE SIMULATIONSI. General Instructions and CommentsA. The following information should be used as a basis for simulating responses.B. Controllers may add to, delete from or otherwise modify any of the following information inresponse to player actions as deemed appropriate.C. Controllers should thorough hly acquaint themselves with any referenced documents andforms prior to the drill.II. NRC Emergency Notification System (ENS)A. Start Time: Approximately 0830 -0900B. ERO Contact: STED/WCS and Operations Technician/ENS CommunicatorC. Contact Location: Control Room and TSCD. Form Used to Record Data: ER 2.0DE. Topic(s) Discussed:1. Information/entries on Form ER 2.0D2. Is there any change to the classification of the event? If so, what is the reason?3. What is the ongoing/imminent damage to the facility, including affected equipmentand safety features?4. Have toxic or radiological releases occurred or been projected, including changes inthe release rate? If so, what is the projected onsite and offsite releases, and what isthe basis of assessment?5. What are the health effect/consequences to onsite/offsite people? How manyonsite/offsite people are/will be affected and to what extent?6. Is the event under control? When was control established, or what is the plannedaction to bring the event under control? What is the mitigative action underway orplanned?7. What onsite protective been taken or planned?8. What offsite protective actions have been recommended to State/local officials? UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONMINI-SCENARIOCFE 14- 0S November 5, 2014MINI-SCENARIO E.1 Page 2 of 4CONTROL CELL INSTRUCTIONS FOR EXTERNAL ERO INTERFACE SIMULATIONS9. What is the status of State/local/other Federal agencies' responses, if known?10. If applicable, what is the status of public information activities, such as alarm,broadcast, or press releases? Has a Joint Information Center been activated?When asked, confirm that the NRC is receiving plant data from ERDS. Request a call backevery 30 minutes with an update until the event is terminated. DO NOT provide anyguidance, recommendations or directions.E. Information to Provide:1. When notified of the Site Area Emergency declaration, inform your ENS contact thatan NRC Site Team has been dispatched to the EOF.a. Estimated arrival time at the EOF is 1400 todayb. Team members:* Site Team Leader* Deputy Site Team Leader* Technical Assessment Branch Leader* Deputy Technical Assessment Branch Leader* Technical Assessment Communicator* Technical Assessment Specialist" Protective Measures Branch Leader" Deputy Protective Measures Branch Leader" Radiation Safety Coordinator* Dose Assessor.* Protective Measures Specialist* Protective Measures Communicator* Safeguards/Security Branch Leader* Chronology/Documentation Branch Leader* Response Coordination Leader" Liaison Leader* State Emergency Operatiof0&enter Liaison* Public Information Leader* Public Information Technical Briefer(s) UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONMINI-SCENARIOCFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014MINI-SCENARIO E.1 Page 3 of 4CONTROL CELL INSTRUCTIONS FOR EXTERNAL ERO INTERFACE SIMULATIONSc. Team will fly to Pease International Tradeport.d. Ground transportation to the EOF has been arranged.2. When notified of the Site Area Emergency declaration, inform your ENS contact thatthe NRC wants the Health Physics Line (HPN) line established by Seabrook Station assoon as possible. Provide your number as the HPN contact number and ask that theHPN Communicator be directed to contact you.Ill. NRC Health Physics NetworkB. Start Time: Sometime after Site Area Emergency declaration. If contact has not beeninitiated by 1045, call the HPN Communicator at 468-3950 and identify yourself as theNRC HPN Communicator.C. ERO Contact: HPN CommunicatorD. Contact Location: EOFE. Form Used to Record Data: ER 2.OGF. Topic(s) Discussed:1. Information/entries on Form ER 2.OG2. Is there any change to the classification of the event? If so, what is the reason?3. Have toxic or radiological releases occurred or been projected (including changes in therelease rate)? If so, what are the actual or currently projected on-site and off-sitereleases, and what is the basis for this assessment?4. What are the health effects or consequences to on-site and off-site people? How manyonsite or offsite people are being or will be affected and to what extent?5. Is the event under control? When was control established, or what is the planned actionto bring the event under control? What mitigative actions are currently underway orplanned?6. What on-site protective measures have been taken or are planned?7. What off-site protective actions are being considered or have been recommended tostate and local officials?8. What are the current meteorological conditions?9. What are the dose and dose rate readings on-site and off-site?Request a call back every 30 minutes \4fan update until the event is terminated. DO NOTprovide any guidance, recommendations or directions. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/inprovement Plan Seabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONMINI-SCENARIOCFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014MINI-SCENARIO E.1 Page 4 of 4CONTROL CELL INSTRUCTIONS FOR EXTERNAL ERO INTERFACE SIMULATIONSF. Information to Provide:1. Telecopy number for HPN formsV. WestinghouseA. Start Time: As initiated by playersB. ERO Contact: Industry LiaisonC. Contact Location: EOFD. Topic(s) Discussed:a. Availability of Westinghouse resourcesi. Accident and transient analysisii. Fuel damage assessmentiii. Replacement fuel and parts to support recovery operationsb. DO NOT provide any response guidance or recommendations.E. Information to provide:1. If a Westinghouse response team is requested by the EOF, provide thefollowing information.a. Estimated arrival time at the EOF: 5 hours after the request, but not earlier than1500.b. Team composition as requested by EOF playersc. Team will fly to Logan Airportd. Request assistance with ground transportation, lodging arrangements,directions to the EOF and required passes.V. PSNH Load DispatcherA. Start Time: As initiated by playersB. ERO Contact: VariousC. Contact Location: VariousD. Topic(s) Discussed: Status of offsite power sources1. The grid is stable. No problems are expected with offsite power sources.190 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONMINI-SCENARIOCFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014MINI-SCENARIO E.2 2 PagesService Water Pump House Repair Team InvestigationUpon entry into the Service Water Pump House the water level in the lower level is approximately 3 feet andslowly lowering. (Figure E-i). This willnecessitate the need to bring in a pump torapidly initiate repairs.Train "A" Service Water Piping is completelysplit and will require 4 days to repair. (FigureE-2)Train 'B" Service Water Piping has areapairable hole (Figure E-3). Sufficent repairscan be made to make this train functional andrestore cooling to PCCW/ Diesel Generator.Yigure E-itigure i,-zFigure E-.ý UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONMINI-SCENARIOCFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014MINI-SCENARIO E.2 2 PagesService Water Pump House Repair Team InvestigationFor the purposes of this drill the line numbers for the leak locations are:A Train Pipe: SW-1801-32, 24" pipe in SWPHB Train Pipe: SW-1802-38, 24" pipe in SWPHTemporary Repairs will be made under a work order developed for this purpose.192 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONMINI-SCENARIOCFE 14- 05 November 5, 2014MINI-SCENARIO E.3EOD Investigation1 PageThere are no unexploded devicesexcept for the device attached tothe 'B" SEPS Diesel Generator.(Figure E-4)tigure L,-4 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationF. Plant Parameter Data194 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook Station4-,V~)0u-IUL-UCU0z195 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationG. Radiological Data196 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationCFE 14- 05 Drill DataRadiological DataUnless otherwise specified in Mini-Scenarios on-site and off-site radiological data will remain "as found"throughout the event. There are no events associated with this scenario that impact radiological conditions.There is no radiological release associated with this scenario.Radiological data will be provided from the simulator.197 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationH. Meteorological Data198 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationCFE 14- 05Drill DataMeteorological DataWind and Stability Class Info, for 11/5/14 ERO HAB Evaluated Exercise:Wind speed, stability class, and wind direction will be relatively constant throughout the Exercise window. Thefollowing times indicate stability class, wind speed, and wind direction at discrete points:Wind WindWind Direction Direction Delta T Delta T StabilityTime LangleySpeed Upper Lower Upper Lower Class(from) (from)Prior to0800 8 225 222 1.20 1.00 1 E08000900 7 222 220 1.10 1.20 1 E1000To end of 7 225' 223 1.10 1.10 1 DExercise199 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationI. Chemistry Data200 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook Station201 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvemnent PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS MESSAGE FORMCH-L121Seabrook StationPRIMARY CHEMISTRY REPORTModes 1 and 2ReactorParameter(1) AL 1 AL 2 AL 3 Coolant Sample Date /System TimeChloride (ppm) (2) >0.050 0.150 >1.50 <0.001 11/4/2014 08:45Fluoride (ppm) (2) >0.050 >0.150 >1.50 <0.001 11/4/2014 08:45Sulfate (ppm) >0.025 >0.150 >1.50 <0.0002 11/4/2014 08:45Dissolved 02 (ppm) (2) >0.005 >0.100 >1.00 <0.0001 11/4/2014 08:45Hydrogen cc/Kg (STP) <25 or >50 <15 <5 34.75 11/4/2014 08:45Boron (ppm) Per COLR N/A N/A 1058 11/4/2014 08:45Lithium (ppm) N/A N/A N/A 2.14 11/4/2014 08:45Dose Equivalent Iodine (pCi/gm) (3) >1.0 3.26e-05 10/29/2014 08:45Gross Activity (pCi/gm)(3) LIMIT -DATE : 77.5 >100/E 1.18e01 11/4/201408:4501/14/2014 08:30Parameter Pressurizer Sam e Date/Boron (ppm) 1055 11/4/2014 08:51Borated Water SourceSource Boron (ppm) Date/TimeBAST A (5) 7221 10/28/2014 12:22BAST B (5) 7287 10/28/2014 00:22RWST (4) 2528 10/28/2014 12:34SFPP (4) 2489 10/17/2014 10:23THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS MESSAGE FORMRM-6505 Correlation Values For S/G Tube Leak1 gpd 25 cpm30 gpd 760 cpm75 gpd 1899 cpmNote: Values used until 'st chemistry grab sample results.(1) Circle all parameters exceeding action level specifications and refer to procedure CP3.1, Section4.2.6.3 for recommended action.(2) Refer to Technical Requirement 30-3.4.7.(3) Refer to Technical Specification 3.4.8 and Table 4.4-3.(4) Refer to COLR for Action Initiation Value.(5) Refer to Technical Specification 29-3.1.2.6 and COLRCation Bed Runs -Normally performed at full flow Minutes:Midshift (-2400): 0Dayshift(-1200): TBDCation Bed Preservice Rinse Required: NORemarks:Technician Signature:11/4/2014 14:45THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationSEABROOK STATIONEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS MESSAGE FORMCHL-088SEABROOK STATION SECONDARY SAMPLE REPORTAbove 50% PowerACTION VALUE SAMPLEPARAMETERS LEVEL (1) (1) DATE/TIMECONDENSATE/FEEDWATERCPD, Oxygen ppb >10 2.9 11/4/2014 08:40FW Hydrazine ppb (3) <8xCPD02or 81 11/4/2014 08:41______________________ <20FW MPA ppb <8,000or> 10332 11/4/201408:42____________________ 12,000FW Oxygen ppb >5 0.71 11/4/201408:43STEAM GENERATORSACTION LEVEL A S/G B S/G C S/G D S/G_________________________________ (1)11/4/2014 00:45 11/4/2014 00:45 11/4/2014 00:45 11/4/2014 00:45Sodium ppb >5 0.37 0.32 0.28 0.29Chloride ppb >10 0.2 <0.2 0.22 <0.2Sulfate ppb >10 0.31 0.32 0.28 0.33rotal Cation Cond. pS/cm >1.2 0.198 0.202 0.202 0.201Secondary (DEI-131), pCi/g (2) 08/05/2014 00:40 NDRECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTION LEVELSTechnician: 11/4/14NOTES: (1) Circled values have exceeded action levels (CPD Oxygen is an Action Initiation Value only)(2) per CX0901.20, limits are 1.OE-3 pCi/g and 1.0E-01 pCi/g. Notify supervision if > 1.OE-6 pCi/g(3) If the ratio of feedwater hoursr hydrazine to feedwater oxygen decreases to a value < 2 and is not restored to a value of > 2 within 8commence shutdo returned to fulwn as quickly as safe plant operation permits. If this ratio is restored to a value > 2, the plant may bepower.Original: Chemistry Department fileCopies: Control Room (FAX #7087)THIS IS A DRILLDO NOT INITIATE ACTIONS AFFECTING STATION OPERATION UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationAPPENDIX E: EOP2014 -2015 SEABROOK STATION EXERCISE CYCLEHOSTILE ACTION BASED (HAB)STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIREEXTENT Q9F PLAY UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationThis page left intentionally blank206 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationTABLE OF CONTENTSContentsBA CKG RO UN D : ............................................................................................................................ 6CA LEN D A R A N D PLA YERS ................................................................................................ 6FA C ILITIES: ................................................................................................................................... 7In Sequence: .............................................................................................................................. 7Equipm ent checklist -O O5 day before ........................................................................... 7O ut of Sequence: ............................................................................................................... 8Evaluation Criteria ........................................................................................................................... 8Special N ote: A LL facilities w ill be evaluated (1.b.1) ................................................... 8EVALUATION AREA 1: Emergency Operations Management ............................................ 10Sub-elem ent L.a -M obilization ............................................................................................ 10Extent of Play ............................................................................................................................ 10N ew H am pshire Extent of Play ............................................................................................. 11Sub-elem ent L .b -Facilities ...................................................................................................... 11N ew H am pshire Extent of Play .......................................................................................... 12Sub-elem ent 1.c -D irection and Control ............................................................................. 12N ew H am pshire Extent of Play .......................................................................................... 12Sub-elem ent 1 .d -Com m unications Equipm ent ................................................................. 13N ew H am pshire Extent of Play .......................................................................................... 13Sub-element I.e -Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations ..................................... 14N ew H am pshire Extent of Play .......................................................................................... 15EVALUATION AREA 2: Protective Action Decision-Making .............................................. 16Sub-elem ent 2.a -Em ergency W orker Exposure Control ................................................... 16N ew H am pshire Extent of Play ............................................................................................ 16Sub-element 2.b. -Radiological Assessment and Protective Action Recommendations andD ecisions for the Plum e Phase of the Em ergency ............................................................... 17Criterion 2.b.1 ........................................................................................................................... 17N ew H am pshire Extent of Play .......................................................................................... 18Criterion 2.b.2: .......................................................................................................................... 18N ew H am pshire Extent of Play .......................................................................................... 19Sub-element 2.c -Protective Action DecisiobFonsideration for the Protection of Personsw ith D isabilities and A ccess/Functional N eeds .................................................................... 19N ew Ham pshire Extent of Play .......................................................................................... 20 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationSub-element 2.d. -Radiological Assessment and Decision-Making for the Ingestion ExposureP a th w ay ..................................................................................................................................... 2 0New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 21Sub-element 2.e. -Radiological Assessment and Decision-Making Concerning Relocation,R e-entry, and R eturn ........................................................................................................... ..2 1New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 22EVALUATION AREA 3: Protective Action Implementation ............................................... 23Sub-element 3.a -Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control ..................... 23New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 24Sub-element 3.b -Implementation of KI Decision ............................................................. 24New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 25Sub-element 3.c -Implementation of Protective Actions for Persons with Disabilities andAccess/Functional Needs ...................................................................................................... 26C riterio n 3 .c.1 ........................................................................................................................... 2 6New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 26C riterio n 3 .c.2 ........................................................................................................................... 2 7New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 27Sub-element 3.d. -Implementation of Traffic and Access Control ..................................... 28C riterio n 3 .d ............................................................................................................................ 2 8New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 28C riterio n 3 .d 2 .......................................................................................................................... 2 9New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 29Sub-element 3.e -Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions .................................. 29C riterio n 3 .e.1 : .......................................................................................................................... 3 0New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 30C riterio n 3 .e.2 : .......................................................................................................................... 3 0New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 30Sub-element 3.f- Implementation of Relocation, Re-entry, and Return Decisions ............. 31New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 32EVALUATION AREA 4: Field Measurement And Analysis ................................................. 32Sub-element 4.a -Plume Phase Field Measurements and Analyses ................................... 32C riterio n 4 .a .2 : .......................................................................................................................... 3 2New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 33C riterio n 4 .a ,3 : .......................................................................................................................... 3 3New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 34Sub-element 4.b -Post Plume Phase Field Il" urements and Sampling ........................... 34New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 35Sub-element 4.c -Laboratory Operations ............................................................................ 35 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationNew Hampshire Extent of Play ................................................................................................. 36EVALUATION AREA 5: Emergency Notification and Public Information ........................... 36Sub-element 5.a -Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System ....................... 36C riterio n 5 .a .1 : .......................................................................................................................... 3 6New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 37C riterio n 5 .a .3 : .......................................................................................................................... 3 8New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 38C riterio n 5 .a .4 : .......................................................................................................................... 3 8New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 39Sub-element 5.b -Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media ..... 39New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 41EVALUATION AREA 6: Support Operation/Facilities ......................................................... 41Sub-element 6.a -Monitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees ................ 41New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 43Sub-element 6.b -Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Worker Equipment ....... 43New Hampshire Extent of Play ............................................................................................... 44Sub-element 6.c -Temporary Care of Evacuees .................................................................. 45New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 46Sub-element 6.d -Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals .......... 46New Hampshire Extent of Play ........................................................................................ 47209 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationNEW HAMPSHIREEXTENT OF PLAYSEABROOK STATION NUCLEAR POWER STATIONHOSTILE ACTION BASED EXERCISEEvaluated Exercise -November 5, 2014BACKGROUND:This is the proposed 2014-2015 Extent of Play (EOP) Criteria for the New Hampshire (N.H.) Off-SiteResponse Organization (ORO) involved in the Hostile Action Based (HAB) Exercise Cycle for SeabrookStation. No changes have been made to any criterion except as noted in the document.This EOP covers all components and activities of the exercise cycle starting with a one day workshop onJune 18, 2014. Several Out-of-Sequence (OOS) activities have been or will be conducted prior to theTabletop Exercise (TTX) scheduled for July 22, 2014. The Exercise Cycle will culminate with the "gradedexercise" on November 5, 2014. Various "out-of-sequence" activities and exercises will be scheduled, butthe criteria utilized will be incorporated within this EOP and noted throughout the document, asappropriate.This document does NOT identify all exercise areas to be discussed/exercised by the State and other off-site response organizations/agencies. The scenarios developed for and utilized in the drills and exerciseswill incorporate sufficient injects to provide opportunities for all players to participate in response andrecovery activities mindful of an all-hazard approach. Items identified in this EOP only will be subject toevaluation.This is a NEW HAMPSHIRE ONLY document. The EOPs for Maine and Massachusetts will be combinedwith this document by FEMA to form a comprehensive EOP for this exercise cycle.CALENDAR AND PLAYERS:Wed. June 18, 2014Registration: 8 a.m.Program 8:30-12:30p.m.Tues,July 22, 2014Exercise 8:30 -4p.m.DESPease TradeportPortsmouth,N.H.DES PeaseTradeportPortsmouth, N.HState EOCsLocal EOCsEOF, JIC,ICP,Monitoring Teamlocations(appropriateother locations)Invited: N.H. and Mass. Local EPZ/Host EOC, ICP,personnel; SEOC Command & General Staff; ESF1,2,3,6,7,8,10, 11,12,13; LL; JIC; RIMC;DPHS/Rad Health Unified Command; RHTA; AA;Lab; EOF Personnel (both DPHS/HSEM); FEMASeabrook StationInvited: SEOC (N.H., Maine, Mass.);Command & General Staff ICP, ESF1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13; LL; JIC; RIMC;DPHS/Rad Health Unified Command; RHTA; AA;Lab; EOF Personnel (both DPHS/HSEM); FEMARegion I; I-MAT Team; RRCC; Seabrook StationMonitoring/Sampling TeamsN.H. and Mass. Local/Host EPZ EOC personnel;ICP, SEOC Command & General Staff; ESF1,2,3,6,7,8,10, 11,12,13; LL; JIC; RIMC;DPHS/Rad24Qth Unified Command; RHTA; AA;Lab; EOF Personnel (both DPHS/HSEM); FEMARegion I; Seabrook StationWorkshopPresentationDiscussion-basedNon-evaluatedTTXDiscussion-basedNon-evaluatedWed., Aug.20, 2014CFE #1ExerciseNon-evaluated UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Inprovement Plan Seabrook StationState EO~s SEOC (N.H., Mass.) Command & General Staff;Local EO~s ESF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13; LL; JIC; RIMC;EOF, JIGIGP, ICP, Staging Area personnel (selected) CFE#2Wed., OctCP 8DPHS/Rad Health Unified Command; RHTA; AA;; Exercise1 ontitorng EOF Personnel (both DPHS/HSEM); FEMA Regionlocations(appropriate I; FRMAC; Seabrook Station; Non-evaluatedother locations) Sampling TeamsState EOC N.H. and Mass. Local/Host EPZ EOC personnel;Local EOCs SEOC Command & General Staff; ICP, ESFLocalo. 1 FO 1,2,3,6,7,8,10, 11,12,13; LL; JIC; RIMC;Wed., Nov. 5, 2014 FEo, JIC,IgP DPHS/Rad Health Unified Command; RHTA; AA;;Monitoring Team EOF Personnel (both DPHS/HSEM); SeabrooklocationsStioStationFACILITIES:The following organizations/locations will be involved in the Seabrook Station HAB ExercisesCycle in FY2014/2015:In Sequence:Local EPZ Community EOCs: Brentwood, E. Kingston, Exeter, Greenland, Hampton,Hampton Falls, Kensington, Kingston, New Castle, Newfields, Newton, North Hampton,Portsmouth, Rye, Seabrook, South Hampton, Stratham.Local Host Communities: Dover, Manchester, Rochester (EOCs only -in sequence)State Emergency Operations CenterN.H. Homeland Security & Emergency Management*** State Local Liaisons may be located at the IFO Bldg. on Pease Tradeport for part or all of theExercise CycleEmergency Operations FacilityNew Hampshire Homeland Security & Emergency Management Agency (HSEM)New Hampshire Department of Public Health/Radiological HealthRadiological Field Monitoring TeamsState Police Dispatch -State Warning PointState Police Troop ARockingham County DispatchRumor Control -E-911 PSAPjoint Information CenterIncident Command Post-General Statement: Town of Seabrook Police, N.H. State Police and other members of the IncidentCommand Post will demonstrate the ability to provide command and coordination of the incident, as wellas radiological protection of personnel. No tactical actions or manning of control points will bedemonstrated. Only those assets or personnel necessary to demonstrate the command, communication, andradiological protection components will be deployed. The Incident Command Post may be placed at analternate location to protect operational security.Field Monitoring Teams -Monitorin~l1eams (MT1 & MT2)Equipment checklist -OOS day beforeDose Assessment Personnel -Will be located at the EOF on Pease Tradeport UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationOut of Sequence:Risk Special Facilities: Tuesday, May 27, 2014Kingston Children's CenterBuilding Block School (Kingston)The Learning Tree (Exeter)Hampton Falls Child Care CenterFun After School (Hampton)The Village Preschool (Hampton)Langdon Place of ExeterWednesday, May 28,2014Sportsmouth Nature School (Greenland)Place for Friends and Fun (Portsmouth)Greenland Central SchoolPortsmouth High SchoolMark Wentworth HomeThursday, May 29, 2014Kid Logic (E. Kingston)Daniel J. Bakie Elementary School (Kingston)Seabrook Middle SchoolMain St. School (Exeter)Hampton Centre SchoolReception Center(s):MS-1 Hospital:NH State Police:Manchester Memorial High School (CFEs Feb.19, March 3;Graded: May 5,2014Dover Middle School (CFEs -May 8, June 5, TBD; Graded :Sept. 18,2014Elliot Hospital, Manchester (Date TBD)Troop A -Epping, N.H.Tactical Staging Area- SimulatedEvaluation CriteriaNote: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates sub-element 1.d.1, L.e.1, 3.a, 3.a.1,3.b. 1, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 4.a.3, 4.b. 1 or 5.b. 1, 6.a. I and 6.b. 1 unsatisfactorily, the FEMA Evaluator willinform the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or localorganization, the FEMA Evaluator will provide the participant another opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day.Special Note: ALL facilities will be evaluated (1.b.1), except ICP.Incident Command Post Evaluation CriteriaL.a.11.c. 11.d.11.e.12.b.23.a.1212 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook Station213 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationEVALUATION AREA 1: Emergency Operations ManagementSub-element L.a -MobilizationIntentThis Sub-element is derived fiom NUREG-0654/FEMA -REP-I, which requires that OROs havethe capability to alert, noti ji, and mobilize emergency personnel, and activate and staffemergency facilities.Criterion 1.a.1: OROs use effective procedures to alert, notify, and mobilize emergencypersonnel and activate facilities in a timely manner. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1,A.L.a, A.l.e, A.3, A.4; C.1, C.4, C.6; D.3, D.4; E.1, E.2; H.3, H.4)Extent of PlayResponsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to receive notification of an incident from thelicensee; verify the notification; and contact, alert, and mobilize key emergency personnel in a timelymaruner and demonstrate the ability to maintain and staff 24-hour operations. Twenty-four-houroperations can be demonstrated during the exercise via rosters or shift changes or otherwise in an actualactivation. Local responders must demonstrate the ability to receive and/or initiate notification to thelicensees or other respective emergency management organizations of an incident in a timely manner,when they receive information from the licensee or alternate sources. Responsible OROs mustdemonstrate the activation of facilities for immediate use by mobilized persormel upon their arrival.Activation of facilities and staff, including those associated with the Incident Command System, must becompleted in accordance with ORO plans/procedures. The location and contact information for facilitiesincluded in the incident comumand must be available to all appropriate responding agencies and the NPPafter these facilities have been activated.Pre-staging of emergency personnel is appropriate, in accordance with the Extent-of-Play Agreement, atthose facilities located beyond a normal conunuting distance from the individual's duty location orresidence. This could include the staggered release of resources from an assembly area. Additionally, pre-staging of staff for out-of-sequence demonstrations may be used in accordance with the Extent-of-PlayAgreement.The REP program does not evaluate Incident Command Post tactical operations (e.g., Law Enforcementhostile action suppression techniques), only coordination among the incident command, the utility, andall appropriate OROs, pursuant to plans/procedures.Initial law enforcement, fire service, HAZMAT, and emergency medical response to the NPP site mayimpact the ability to staff REP functions. The ability to identify and request additional resources oridentify compensatory measures must be demonstrated. Exercises must also address the role of mutualaid in the incident, as appropriate. An integral part of the response to an HAB scenario at an NPP mayalso be within the auspices of the Federal Government (e.g., FBI, NRC, or DHS). Protocols for requestingFederal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement support must be demonstrated, as appropriate. Anyresources must be on the ORO's mobilization list so they can be contacted during an incident, if needed.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actualemergency, unless noted above or otherwise specifkI4n the Extent-of-Play Agreement. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/ImproveExent PlanSeabrook StationNew Hampshire Extent of PlaySub-element 1.b -FacilitiesIntentThis sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which provides that OJfsiteResponse Organizations (ORO) have facilities to support the emergency response.Criterion 1.b.1: Facilities are sufficient to support the emergency response. (NUREG-0654/ FEMA-REP-1, H.3; G.3.a; J.1O.h; J.12; K.5.b)Extent of Play215Responsible OROs must demonstrate, no less than once every eight years, the availability of facilities tosupport accomplishment of emergency operations (this includes all alternate and backup facilities).Evaluations are typically performed for EOCs and JICs, as well as other facilities such asreception/relocation centers. Some of the areas evaluated within the facilities are adequate space, UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationfurnishings, lighting, restrooms, ventilation, backup power, and/or alternate facility, if required tosupport operations. Radio stations, laboratories, initial warning points and hospitals are not evaluatedunder 1.b.1.In addition, facilities will be evaluated for this criterion during the first biennial exercise after any new orsubstantial changes in structure, equipment, or mission that affect key capabilities, as outlined inespective emergency plans/procedures. A substantial change is one that has a direct effect or impact onemergency response operations performed in those facilities. Examples of substantial changes include:modifying the size or configuration of an emergency operations center, adding more function to a center,or changing the equipment available for use in a center. All activities must be based on the ORO'splans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above orotherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of PlaySub-element 1.c -Direction and ControlIntentThis sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEM -REP-], which provides that OffsiteResponse Organizations (ORO) have the capability to control their overall response to anemergency.Criterion 1.c.1: Key personnel with leadership roles for the ORO provide direction andcontrol to that part of the overall response effort for which they are responsible.(NUREG-0654, A.l.d; A.2.a, b; A.3; C.4, 6)Extent of PlayLeadership personnel must demonstrate the ability to carry out the essential management functions ofthe response effort (e.g., keeping staff informed through periodic briefings and/or other means,coordinating with other OROs, and ensuring completion of requirements and requests.) Leadership mustdemonstratethe ability to prioritize resource tasking and replace/supplement resources (e.g., throughMOUs or otheragreements) when faced with competing demands for finite resources. Any resourcesidentified through LOA/MOUs must be on the ORO's mobilization list so they may be contacted duringan incident, if needed.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actualemergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationSub-element 1.d -Communications EquipmentIntentThis Sub-element is derived firom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs establish andoperate reliable primary and backup communication systems to ensure coinnunications with keyemergency personnel at locations such as contiguous governments within the EPZ, Federal emergencyresponse organizations, the licensee and its.facilities, EOCs, Incident Command Posts, and FMTs.Criterion 1.d. 1: At least two communication systems are available, at least one operatesproperly, and communication links are established and maintained with appropriatelocations. Communications capabilities are managed in support of emergencyoperations. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, F.1, 2)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterioni is accomplished initially in a baseline evaluation andsubsequently in periodic testing and drills. System familiarity and use must be demonstrated as applicablein biennial or tabletop exercise, or if their use would be required, during an actual eventOROs must demonstrate that a primary system, and at least one backup system for fixed facilities, is fullyfunctional at all times. Communications systems are maintained and tested on a recurring basisthroughout the assessment period and system status is available to all operators. Periodic test results andcorrective actions are maintained on a real time basis. If a communications system or systems are notfunctional, but exercise performance is not affected, no exercise issue will be assessed.Communications equipment and procedures for facilities and field units are used as needed fortransmission and receipt of exercise messages. All facilities, FMTs, and incident conmand must have thecapability to access at least one conununication system that is independent of the commercial telephonesystem. Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to manage the communication systems andensure that all message traffic is handled without delays that might disrupt emergency operations. OROsmust ensure that a coordinated communication link for fixed and mobile medical support facilities exists.Exercise scenarios may require the failure of a conurnunication system and use of an alternate system, asnegotiated in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actualemergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of PlayNote: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates this sub-element unsatisfactorily, theFEMA Evaluator will inform the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or local organization, the FEMA Evaluator will provide the participantanother opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day.217 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationSub-element i.e -Equipment and Supplies to Support OperationsIntentThis sub-element is derived fiom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-], which provides that OffsiteResponse Organizations (ORO) have emergency equipment and supplies adequate to support theemergency response.Criterion 1.e.l: Equipment, maps, displays, dosimetiy, potassium iodide (KI), andother supplies are sufficient to support emergency operations. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, H. 7, 10; L 7, 8, 9; J.10.a, b, e; J.11, 12; K.3.a; K.5.b)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion is accomplished primarily through a baseline evaluation andsubsequent periodic inspections.A particular facility's equipment and supplies must be sufficient and consistent with that facility'sassigned role in the ORO's emergency operations plans. Use of maps and other displays is encouraged.For non-facility-based operations, the equipment and supplies must be sufficient and consistent with theassigned operational role. At locations where traffic and access control personnel are deployed,appropriate equipment (e.g., vehicles, barriers, traffic cones, and signs) must be available, or theiravailability described.Specific equipment and supplies that must be demonstrated under this criterion include KI inventories,dosinetry, and monitoring equipment, as follows:KI: Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to maintain inventories of KI sufficient for useby: (1) emergency workers; (2) institutionalized individuals, as indicated in capacity lists for facilities;and (3) where stipulated by the plans / procedures, members of the general public (including transients)within the plume pathway EPZ. In addition, OROs must demonstrate provisions to make KI available tospecialized response teams (e.g., civil support team, Special Weapons and Tactics Teams, urban searchand rescue, bomb squads, HAZMAT, or other ancillary groups) as identified in plans / procedures). Theplans / procedures must include the forms to be used for documenting emergency worker ingestion ofKI, as well as a mechanism for identifying emergency workers that have declined KI in advance.Consider carefully the placement of emergency workers that have declined KI in advance.ORO quantities of dosimnetry and KI available and storage locations(s) will be confirmed by physicalinspection at the storage location(s) or through documentation of current inventory submitted during theexercise, provided in the ALC submission, and/or verified during an SAV. Available supplies of KI mustbe within the expiration date indicated on KI bottles or blister packs. As an alternative, the ORO mayproduce a letter from a certified private or state laboratory indicating that the KI supply remains potent,in accordance with U.S. Pharmacopoeia standards.Dosimetry: Sufficient quantities of appropriate direct-reading and permanent record dosimetry anddosimeter chargers must be available for issuance to all emergency workers who will be dispatched toperform an ORO mission. In addition, OROs must demonstrate provisions to make dosinetry availableto specialized response teams (e.g., civil support team, Special Weapons and Tactics Teams, urbansearch and rescue, bomb squads, HAZMAT, or other ancillary groups) as identified in plans /procedures).218Appropriate direct-reading dosimetry must allow an individual(s) to read the administrative reportinglimits and maximum exposure limits contained in the ORO's plans / procedures. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationDirect-reading dosimeters must be zeroed or operationally checked prior to issuance. The dosimetersmust be inspected for electrical leakage at least arnually and replaced when necessary. Civil DefenseVictoreen Model 138s (CD V-138s) (0-200 mR), due to their documented history of electrical leakageproblems, must be inspected for electrical leakage at least quarterly and replaced when necessary. Thisleakage testing will be verified during the exercise, through documentation submitted in the ALC and/orthrough an SAV.Operational checks and testing of electronic dosimeters must be in accordance with the manufacturer'sinstructions and be verified during the exercise, through documentation submitted in the ALC and/orthrough an SAV.Monitoring Instruments: All instruments must be inspected, inventoried, and operationally checkedbefore each use. Instruments must be calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer'srecommendations. Unmodified CDV-700 series instruments and other instruments without amanufacturer's recommendation must be calibrated annually. Modified CDV-700 instruments must becalibrated in accordance with the recommendation of the modification manufacturer. A label indicatingsuch calibration must be on each instrument or calibrated frequency can be verified by other means. Inaddition, instruments being used to measure activity must have a sticker-affixed to their sides indicatingthe effective range of the readings. The range of readings documentation specifies the acceptable range ofreadings that the meter should indicate when it is response-checked using a standard test source.For FMTs, the instruments must be capable of measuring gamma exposure rates and detecting betaradiation. These instruments must be capable of measuring a range of activity and exposure, includingradiological protection/exposure control of team members and detection of activity on air samplecollection media, consistent with the intended use of the instrument and the ORO's plans / procedures.An appropriate radioactive check source must be used to verify proper operational response for eachlow-range radiation measurement instrument (less than 1R/hr) and for high-range instruments whenavailable. If a source is not available for a high-range instrument, a procedure must exist to operationallytest the instrument before entering an area where only a high-range instrument can make useful readings.In areas where portal monitors are used, the OROs must set up and operationally check the monitor(s).The monitor(s) must conform to the standards set forth in the Contamination Monitoring Standard for aPortal Monitor Used for Emergency Response, FEMA-REP-21 (March 1995) or in accordance with themanufacturer's reconmmendations.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of PlayNote: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates this sub-element unsatisfactorily, theFEMA Evaluator will inform the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or local organization, the IIIA Evaluator will provide the participantanother opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationEVALUATION AREA 2: Protective Action Decision-MakingSub-element 2.a -Emergency Worker Exposure ControlIntentThis Sub-element is derived firom NUREG-0654/FEMA -REP-1, which requires that OROshave the capabilih, to assess and control the radiation exposure received by emergencyworkers and have a decision chain in place, as specified in the ORO's plans/procedures, toauthorize emergency worker exposure limits to be exceededfor specific missions.Radiation exposure limits for emergency workers are the recommended accumulated doselimits or exposure rates that emergency workers may be permitted to incur during anemergency. These limits include any pre-established administrative reporting limits (that takeinto consideration TEDE or organ- specific limits) identified in the ORO's plans/procedures.Criterion 2.a.l: OROs use a decision-making process, considering relevant factors andappropriate coordination, to ensure that an exposure control system, including the useof KI, is in place for emergency workers including provisions to authorize radiationexposure in excess of administrative limits or protective action guides. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, C.6; J.lO. e,f; K.4)Extent of PlayOROs authorized to send emergency workers into the plume exposure pathway EPZ should demonstratea capability to meet the criterion based on their emergency plans and procedures.Responsible OROs should demonstrate the capability to make decisions concerning the authorization ofexposure levels in excess of pre-authorized levels and to the number of emergency workers receivingradiation dose above pre-authorized levels. As appropriate, OROs should demonstrate the capability tomake decisions on the distribution and administration of KI as a protective measure, based on the ORO'splan and/or procedures or projected thyroid dose compared with the established Protective Action Guides(PAGs) for KI administration. All activities must be based on the ORO's plans and procedures andcompleted, as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise indicated in theextent of play agreement.New Hampshire Extent of Play UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/improvement Plan Seabrook StationSub-element 2.b. -Radiological Assessment and Protective Action Recommendations andDecisions for the Plume Phase of the EmergencyIntentThis Sub-element is derivedfrom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to independently project integrated dose fiom projected or actual dose rates andcompare these estimates to the PA Gs.OROs must have the capability to choose, among a range ofprotective actions, those mostappropriate in a given emergency. OROs base these choices on PA Gs from theirplans/procedures or EPA 's Manual of Protective Action Guides and Protective Actions forNuclear hIcidents and other criteria, such as plant conditions, licensee PARs, coordination ofPADs with other politicaljurisdictions (e.g., other affected OROs and incident command),availability of in-place shelter, weather conditions, and situations, to include HAB incidents.,the threat posed by the specific hostile action, the affiliated response, and the effect of anevacuation on the threat response effort, that create higher than normal risk fiom generalpopulation evacuation.Criterion 2.b.1: Appropriate protective action recommendations are based onavailable information on plant conditions, field monitoring data, and licensee andORO dose projections, as well as knowledge of onsite and offsite environmentalconditions. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, 1.10 and Supplement 3)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion must be accomplished concurrently with a licenseeexercise and may be demonstrated in a biennial or tabletop exercise.During the initial stage of the emergency response, following notification of plant conditions that maywarrant offsite protective actions, the ORO must demonstrate the capability to use appropriate means,described in the plans/procedures, to develop PARs for decision-makers based on availableinformation and recommendations provided by the licensee as well as field monitoring data, ifavailable. The ORO must also consider any release and meteorological data provided by the licensee.The ORO must demonstrate a reliable capability to independently validate dose projections. The typesof calculations to be demonstrated depend on the data available and the need for assessments to supportthe PARs must be appropriate to the scenario. In all cases, calculation of projected dose must bedemonstrated. Projected doses must be related to quantities and units of the PAG to which they will becompared. PARs must be promptly transmitted to decision-makers in a pre-arranged format.When the licensee and ORO projected doses differ by more than a factor of 10, the ORO and licenseemust determine the source of the difference by discussing input data and assumptions, using differentmodels, or exploring possible reasons. Resolution of these differences must be incorporated into thePARs if timely and appropriate. The ORO must demonstrate the capability to use any additional datato refine projected doses and exposure rates and revise the associated PARs.221All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationNew Hampshire Extent of PlayCriterion 2.b.2: A decision-making process involving consideration of appropriatefactors and necessary coordination is used to make protective action decisions (PAD)for the general public (including the recommendation for the use of KI, if ORO policy).(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, A.3; C.4, 6; D.4; J.9; J.lO.f, n)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion mtiust be accomplished concurrently with a licensee exercise andmay be demonstrated in a biennial or tabletop exercise.OROs must have the capability to make both initial and subsequent PADs. OROs must demonstrate thecapability to make initial PADs in a timely manner appropriate to the incident, based on informationfrom the licensee, assessment of plant status and potential or actual releases, other available informationrelated to the incident, input from appropriate ORO authorities (e.g., incident command), and PARsfrom the utility and ORO staff. In addition, a subsequent or alternate PAD may be appropriate ifvarious conditions (e.g., an HAB incident, weather, release timing and magnitude) pose undue risk toan evacuation, or if evacuation may disrupt the efforts to respond to a hostile action.OROs must demonstrate the ability to obtain supplemental resources (e.g., mutual aid) necessary toimplement a PAD if local law enforcement, fire service, HAZMAT, and emergency medical resourcesare utilized to augment response to the NPP site or other key infrastructure.Dose assessment personnel may provide additional PARs based on the subsequent dose projections,field monitoring data, or information on plant conditions. In addition, incident command must provideinput regarding considerations for subsequent PARs based on the magnitude of the ongoing threat, theresponse, and/or site conditions. The decision-makers must demonstrate the capability to changeprotective actions based on the combination of all these factors.If the ORO has determined that KI will be used as a protective measure for the general public underoffsite plans/procedures, then it must demonstrate the capability to make decisions on the distributionand administration of KI to supplement sheltering and evacuation. This decision must be based on theORO's plans/procedures or projected thyroid dose compared with the established PAG for KIadministration. The KI decision-making process must involve close coordination with appropriateassessment and decision- making staff.If more than one ORO is involved in decision making, all appropriate OROs must communicate andcoordinate PADs with each other. In addition, decisions must be coordinated/communicated withincident command. OROs must demonstrate the capability to communicate the results of decisions toall the affected locations. 222All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationNew Hampshire Extent of PlaySub-element 2.c -Protective Action Decisions Consideration for the Protection of Personswith Disabilities and Access/Functional NeedsIntentThis Sub-element is derivedfrom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to determine PADs, including evacuation, sheltering, and use of KI, if applicable,for groups ofpersons with disabilities and access/functional needs (e.g., hospitals, nursinghomes, correctional facilities, schools, licensed daycare centers, mobility-impaired individuals,and transportation-dependent individuals). The focus is on those groups of persons withdisabilities and access/functional needs that are, or potentially will be, affected by aradiological release fiom an NPP.Criterion 2.c. 1: Protective action decisions are made, as appropriate, for groups ofpersons with disabilities and access/functional needs. (NUREG-0654/FEMA -REP-1,D.4; J.9; J.1O.d, e)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion must be accomplished concurrently with a licenseeexercise and may be demonstrated in a biennial or tabletop exercise that would include the useofplant conditions transmittedfrom the licensee.Usually it is appropriate to implement evacuation in areas where doses are projected to exceed thelower end of the range of PAGs, except for incidents where there is a high-risk environmentalcondition or where high-risk groups (e.g., the immobile or infirm) are involved. In these cases, factorsthat must be considered include weather conditions, shelter availability, availability of transportationassets, risk of evacuation versus risk from the avoided dose, and precautionary school evacuations. Inaddition, decisions must be coordinated/communicated with the incident command. In situationswhere an institutionalized population cannot be evacuated, the ORO must consider use of KI.Applicable OROs must demonstrate the capability to alert and notify all public school systems/districtsof emergency conditions that are expected to or may necessitate protective actions for students.Demonstration requires that the OROs actually contact public school systems/districts during theexercise.In accordance with plans/procedures, OROs and/or officials of public school systems/districts mustdemonstrate the capability to make prompt decisions on protective actions for students. The decision-making process, including any preplanned strategies for protective actions for that ECL, must considerthe location of students at the time (e.g., whether the students are still at home, en route to school, or atschool).223All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationNew Hampshire Extent of PlaySub-element 2.d. -Radiological Assessment and Decision-Making for the IngestionExposure PathwayIntentThis Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA -REP-i, which requires that OROshave the means to assess the radiological consequences for the ingestion exposure pathway,relate them to the appropriate PAGs, and make timely, appropriate PADs to mitigateexposure from the pathway.During an incident at an NPP, a release of radioactive material may contaminate watersupplies and agricultural products in the surrounding areas. Any such contamination wouldlikely occur during the plume phase of the incident and, depending on the nature of therelease, could impact the ingestion pathway for weeks or years.Criterion 2.d.l: Radiological consequences for the ingestion pathway areassessed and appropriate protective action decisions are made based on theORO's planning criteria. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, A.3; C.1, 4; D.4; J.9,11)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion must be accomplished concurrently with a licensee exercise and mtlay bedemonstrated in a biennial or tabletop exercise that would include the use of plant conditions transmitted from thelicensee.OROs are expected to take precautionary actions to protect food and water supplies, or to mininmizeexposure to potentially contaminated water and food, in accordance with their respectiveplans/procedures. Often OROs initiate such actions based on criteria related to the facility's ECLs. Suchactions may include recommendations to place milk animals on stored feed and use protected watersupplies.The ORO must use its procedures to assess the radiological consequences of a release on the food andwater supplies, such as the development of a sampling plan. The ORO's assessment must includeevaluation of the radiological analyses of representative samples of water, food, and other ingestiblesubstances of local interest from potentially impacted areas; characterization of the releases from thefacility; and the extent of areas potentially impacted by the release. During this assessment, OROs mustconsider use of agricultural and watershed data vdARtn the 50-mile EPZ. The radiological impacts onthe food and water must then be compared to the appropriate ingestion PAGs contained in the ORO'splans/procedures. The plans/procedures contain PAGs based on specific dose commitment criteria oron criteria as recommended by current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance. Timely and UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationappropriate recommnendations must be provided to the ORO decision-makers group forimplementation decisions. OROs may also include a comparison of taking or not taking a given actionon the resultant ingestion pathway dose commitments.The ORO must demonstrate timely decisions to minimize radiological impacts from theingestion pathway, based on the given assessments and other information. Any such decisionsmust be communicated and, to the extent practical, coordinated with neighboring OROs.OROs will use Federal resources, as identified in the Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex of the NRF andother resources (e.g., compacts or nuclear insurers), as necessary. Evaluation of this criterion will take intoconsideration the level of Federal and other participating resources.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of PlaySub-element 2.e. -Radiological Assessment and Decision-Making Concerning Relocation,Re-entry, and ReturnIntentThis Sub-element is derived friom NUREG-0654/FEMA4-REP-1, which requires that OROshave the capability to make decisions on post-plume phase relocation, reentry, and return ofthe general public. These decisions are essential for protection of the public fiom direct long-term exposure to deposited radioactive materials fiom a severe incident at an NPP.Criterion 2.e.l: Timely relocation, re-entry, and return decisions are made andcoordinated as appropriate, based on assessments of the radiological conditions andcriteria in the ORO's plan and/or procedures. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, .10;J.9; K.3.a; M.1)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion must be accomplished concurrently with a licensee exercise and may bedemonstrated in a .fill-scale, functional or tabletop exercise that would include the use of plant conditionstransmitted fromt the licensee.Relocation: OROs must demonstrate the capability to estimate integrated dose in contaminated areas andcompare these estimates with PAGs; apply decision criteria for relocation of those individuals in thegeneral public who have not been evacuated, but where actual or projected doses are in excess ofrelocation PAGs; and control access to evacuated and restricted areas.OROs will make decisions for relocating members of the evacuated public who lived in areas that nowhave residual radiation levels in excess of the PAGs. Determination of areas to be restricted must bebased on factors such as the mix of radionuclides in deposited materials, calculated exposure rates versusthe PAGs, and analyses of vegetation and soil field samples.225Reentry: Decisions must be made on location of control points and policies regarding access andexposure control for emergency workers and members of the general public who need to temporarilyenter the evacuated area to perform specific tasks or missions. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationExamples of control procedures are the assignment of, or checking for, direct-reading and permanentrecord dosimetry for emergency workers; questions regarding an individual's objectives, locationsexpected to be visited, and associated timeframes; availability of maps and plots of radiation exposurerates; and advice on areas to avoid. Control procedures also include monitoring of individuals, vehicles,and equipment; the implementation of decision criteria regarding decontamination; and properdisposition of emergency worker dosimetry and maintenance of emergency worker radiation exposurerecords.Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to develop a strategy for authorized reentry ofindividuals into the restricted zone(s), based on established decision criteria. OROs must demonstratethe capability to modify those policies for security purposes (e.g., police patrols), maintenance of essentialservices (e.g., fire protection and utilities), and other critical functions. They must demonstrate thecapability to use decision-making criteria in allowing access to the restricted zone by the public forvarious reasons, such as to maintain property (e.g., to care for farm animnals or secure machinery forstorage) or retrieve important possessions. Coordinated policies for access and exposure control must bedeveloped among all agencies with roles to perform in the restricted zone(s). OROs must demonstratethe capability to establish policies for provision of dosimetry to all individuals allowed to reenter therestricted zone(s). The extent to which OROs need to develop policies on reentry will be determined byscenario events.Return: OROs must demonstrate the capability to implement policies concerning return of members ofthe public to areas that were evacuated during the plume phase (i.e., permitting populations that werepreviously evacuated to reoccupy their homes and businesses on an unrestricted basis). OROs must basedecisions on environmental data and political boundaries or physical/ geological features, which allowidentification of the boundaries of areas to which members of the general public may return. Return ispermitted to the boundary of the restricted area(s) that is based on the relocation PAG.Other factors that the ORO must consider in decision-making include conditions that permit cancellationof the ECL and relaxation of associated restrictive measures. OROs must base return reconmmendationson measurements of radiation from ground deposition. OROs must have the capability to identifyservices and facilities that require restoration within a few days and to identify the procedures andresources for their restoration. Examples of these services and facilities are medical and social services,utilities, roads, schools, and intermediate-term housing for relocated persons.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of Play226 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationEVALUATION AREA 3: Protective Action ImplementationSub-element 3.a -Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure ControlIntentThis Sub-element is derived f!om NUREG-0654/FEAIL4-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to provide for the following: distribution, use, collection., and processing ofdirect-reading dosimetry and permanent record dosimety; reading of direct-reading dosimetryby emergency workers at appropriate frequencies; maintaining a radiation dose record for eachemergency worker; establishing a decision chain or authorization procedure for emergencyworkers to incur radiation exposures in excess of the PA Gs, and the capability to provide Klforemergency workers, always applying the as low as is reasonably achievable principle asappropriate.Criterion 3.a.l: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry and procedures, and manageradiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans andprocedures. Emnergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read theirdosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart.(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, J. 1O.e; K.3.a, b; K.4)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during afill-scale, fiunctional or tabletop exercise.Other means mtay include drills, seniinars or training activities that would filly demtonstrate technical proficiency.OROs must demonstrate the capability to provide emergency workers (including supplementalresources) with the appropriate direct-reading and permanent record dosimetry, dosimeter chargers, KI,and instructions on the use of these items. For evaluation purposes, appropriate direct-reading dosimetryis defined as dosimetry that allows an individual(s) to read the administrative reporting linmits that arepre-established at a level low enough to consider subsequent calculation of TEDE and maximumexposure limits, for those emergency workers involved in lifesaving activities, contained in the ORO'splans / procedures.Each emergency worker must have basic knowledge of radiation exposure limits as specified in theORO's plans / procedures. If supplemental resources are used, they must be provided with just-in-timetraining to ensure basic knowledge of radiation exposure control. Emergency workers must demonstrateprocedures to monitor and record dosimeter readings and manage radiological exposure control.During a plume phase exercise, emergency workers must demonstrate the procedures to be followedwhen administrative exposure limits and turn-back values are reached. The emergency worker mustreport accumulated exposures during the exercise as indicated in the plans / procedures. OROs mustdemonstrate the actions described in the plans / procedures by determining whether to replace theworker, authorize the worker to incur additional exposures, or take other actions. If exercise play doesnot require emergency workers to seek authorizations for additional exposure, evaluators must interviewat least two workers to determine their knowledge of whom to contact in case authorization is needed,and at what exposure levels. Workers may use any available resources (e.g., written procedures and/orcoworkers) in providing responses. 227Although it is desirable for all emergency workers to each have a direct-reading dosimeter, there may besituations where team members will be in close proximity to each other during the entire mission. In UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationsuch cases, adequate control of exposure can be achieved for all team members using one direct-readingdosimeter worn by the team leader. Emergency workers assigned to low-exposure rate fixed facilities(e.g., EOCs and conmmunications center within the EPZ, reception centers, and counting laboratories) mayhave individual direct-reading dosimeters or they may be monitored using group dosimetry (i.e., direct-reading dosimeters strategically placed in the work area). Each team member must still have his or herown permanent record dosimetry. Individuals authorized by the ORO to reenter an evacuated areaduring the plume (emergency) phase, must be limited to the lowest radiological exposure conmmensuratewith completing their missions.OROs may have administrative limits lower than EPA-400-R-92-001 dose limits for emergency workersperforming various services (e.g., life-saving, protection of valuable property, all activities). OROs mustensure that the process used to seek authorization for exceeding dose limits does not negatively impactthe capability to respond to an incident where life-saving and/or protection of valuable property mayrequire an urgent response.OROs must demonstrate the capability to accomplish distribution of KI to emergency workers consistentwith decisions made. OROs must have the capability to develop and maintain lists of emergencyworkers who have ingested KI, including documentation of the date(s) and time(s) they did so. Ingestionof KI recommended by the designated ORO health official is voluntary. For evaluation purposes, theactual ingestion of KI shall not be performed. OROs must demonstrate the capability to formulate anddisseminate instructions on using KI for those advised to take it. Emergency workers must demonstratebasic knowledge of procedures for using KI whether or not the scenario drives the implementation of KIuse. This can be accomplished by an interview with the evaluator.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of PlayNote: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates this sub-element unsatisfactorily, theFEMA Evaluator will inforn the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or local organization, the FEMA Evaluator will provide the participantanother opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day.Sub-element 3.b -Implementation of KI DecisionIntentThis Sub-element is derived fiom NUREG-O647*EMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to provide Kifor institutionalized individuals, and, if in the plans / procedures, tothe general public for whom immediate evacuation may not be feasible, veiy difficult, orsignificantly delayed. While it is necessary for OROs to have the capabiliot to provide KI to UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Inprovement Plan Seabrook Stationinstitutionalized individuals, providing KI to the general public is an ORO option and must bereflected as such in ORO plans / procedures. Provisions nmust include the availability ofadequate quantities, storage, and means of distributing KI.Criterion 3.b.1: KI and appropriate instructions are available should a decision torecommend use of K! be made. Appropriate record keeping of the administrationof KI for emergency workers and institutionalized individuals is maintained.(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, J. 10.e, f)Extent of PlayAssessmenit of this Denionstration Criterion may be accomplished during a full-scale, finctional or tabletop exercise.Other means may include drills, seminars or training activities that zoodd fully demonstrate technical proficiency.OROs must demonstrate the capability to make KI available to institutionalized individuals, and, whereprovided for in their plans / procedures, to members of the general public. OROs must demonstrate thecapability to accomplish distribution of KI consistent with decisions made.OROs must have the capability to develop and maintain lists of institutionalized individuals who haveingested KI, including documentation of the date(s) and time(s) they were instructed to ingest KI.Ingestion of KI recommended by the designated ORO health official is voluntary. For evaluationpurposes, the actual ingestion of KI shall not be performed. OROs must demonstrate the capability toformulate and disseminate instructions on using KI for those advised to take it.If a recommendation is made for the general public to take KI, appropriate information must be providedto the public by the means of notification specified in the ORO's plans / procedures.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of PlayNote: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates this sub-element unsatisfactorily, theFEMA Evaluator will inforn the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or local organization, the FEMA Evaluator will provide the participantanother opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day.229 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationSub-element 3.c -Implementation of Protective Actions for Persons with Disabilities andAccess/Functional NeedsIntentThis Sub-element is derived firom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-], which requires that OROs havethe capability to implement PADs, including evacuation and/or sheltering, for all persons withdisabilities and access /fiunctional needs. The focus is on those persons with disabilities andaccess/functional needs that are (or potentially will be) qffected by a radiological release froinan NPP.Criterion 3.c.1: Protective action decisions are implemented for persons withdisabilities and access/functional needs other than schools within areas subject toprotective actions. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, J.1O.c, d, e, g)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Denionstration Criterion may be accomplished dnring a fill-scale or functional exercise, anactual event, or by ummeans of drills conducted at any time.Applicable OROs must demonstrate the capability to alert and notify (i.e., provide PARs and emergencyinformation and instructions to) persons with disabilities and access/functional needs, includinghospitals / medical facilities, nursing homes, correctional facilities, and mobility-inpaired andtransportation-dependent individuals. OROs must demonstrate the capability to provide for persons withdisabilities and access / functional needs in accordance with plans / procedures.Contact with persons with disabilities and access / functional needs and reception facilities may be actualor simulated, as agreed to in the extent of play. Some contacts with transportation providers must beactual, as negotiated in the extent of play. All actual and simulated contacts must be logged.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of Play UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCriterion 3.c.2: OROs/School officials implement protective actions for schools.(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, J.1O.c, d, e, g)Extent of PlayAssessnient of this Denmonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a fidl-scale, fiunctional, or tabletopexercise, an actual event, or by means of drills conducted at any time.Public school systems / districts must demonstrate the ability to implement PADs for students. Thedemonstration must be made as follows: each school system / district within the 10 mile EPZ mustdemonstrate implementation of protective actions. At least one school per affected system / district mustparticipate in the demonstration. Canceling the school day, dismissing early, or sheltering in place mustbe simulated by describing to evaluators the procedures that would be followed. If evacuation is theimplemented protective action, all activities to coordinate and complete the evacuation of students toreception centers, congregate care centers, or host schools may actually be demonstrated or accomplishedthrough an interview process.If accomplished through an interview, appropriate school personnel including decision-making officials(e.g., schools' superintendent/principals and transportation director/bus dispatchers), and at least onebus driver (and the bus driver's escort, if applicable) must be available to demonstrate knowledge of theirrole(s) in the evacuation of school children. Corm-nunications capabilities between school officials and thebuses, if required by the plans / procedures, must be verified.Officials of the school system(s) must demonstrate the capability to develop and provide timelyinformation to OROs for use in messages to parents, the general public, and the media on the status ofprotective actions for schools.The provisions of this criterion also apply to any private schools, private kindergartens, and licenseddaycare centers that participate in REP exercises pursuant to the ORO's plans / procedures as negotiatedin the Extent-of-Play Agreement.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of Play231 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/mnprovement Plan Seabrook StationSub-element 3.d. -Implementation of Traffic and Access ControlIntentThis Sub-element is derived firom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to implement protective action plans / procedures, including relocation andrestriction of access to evacuated/sheltered areas. This Sub-element focuses on selecting,establishing, and staffing of traffic and access control points, and removal of impediments to theflow of evacuation traffic.Criterion 3.d.1: Appropriate traffic and access control is established. Accurateinstructions are provided to traffic and access control personnel.(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, A.3; C1, 4; J.1O.gj)E.xtent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a full-scale or functional exercise, anactual event, or byi means of drills conducted at anly time.OROs must demonstrate the capability to select, establish, and staff appropriate traffic and access controlpoints consistent with current conditions and PADs (e.g., evacuating, sheltering, and relocation) in atimely manner. OROs must demonstrate the capability to provide instructions to traffic and accesscontrol staff on actions to take when modifications in protective action strategies necessitate changes inevacuation patterns or in the area(s) where access is controlled.Traffic and access control staff must demonstrate accurate knowledge of their roles and responsibilities,including verifying emergency worker identification and access authorization to the affected areas, as perthe Extent-of-Play Agreement. These capabilities may be demonstrated by actual deployment or byinterview, in accordance with the Extent-of-Play Agreement.In instances where OROs lack authority necessary to control access by certain types of traffic (e.g., rail,water, and air traffic), they must demonstrate the capability to contact the state or Federal agencies thathave the needed authority, as agreed upon in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of Play UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationNote: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates this sub-element unsatisfactorily, theFEMA Evaluator will inform the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or local organization, the FEMA Evaluator will provide the participantanother opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day.Criterion 3.d.2: Impediments to evacuation are identified and resolved.(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, J. 10.k)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a fidl-scale orfunctional exercise, an actual event, or by means of drills conducted at any time.OROs must demonstrate the capability, as required by the scenario, to identify and take appropriateactions concerning impediments to evacuation. Actual dispatch of resources to deal with impediments,such as wreckers, need not be demonstrated; however, all contacts, actual or simulated, must be logged.The impediment must occur during the evacuation and be on an evacuation route such that re-routing oftraffic is required, triggering decision-making and coordination with the JIC to communicate the alternateroute to evacuees leaving the area.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of PlayNote: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates this sub-element unsatisfactorily, theFEMA Evaluator will inform the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or local organization, the FEMA Evaluator will provide the participantanother opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day.Sub-element 3.e -Implementation of Ingestion Pathway DecisionsIntentThis Sub-element is derived fiom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-], which requires that OROs havethe capability to implement protective actions, based on criteria recommended by current FDAguidance, for the ingestion exposure pathway 2 (i.e., the area within an approximate 50-mileradius of the NPP). This Sub-element focuses on those actions required for implementation ofprotective actions. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCriterion 3.e.1: The ORO demonstrates the availability and appropriate use ofadequate information regarding water, food supplies, milk, and agriculturalproduction within the ingestion exposure pathway emergency planning zone forimnplementation of protective actions. NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, A.3; C. 1, 4; J. 11)Extent of PlayAssessmtent of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a fill-scale or finctional exercise, anactual evtent, or by means of drills conducted at any time.Applicable OROs must demonstrate the capability to secure and use current information on the locationsof dairy farms, meat and poultry producers, fisheries, fruit growers, vegetable growers, grain producers,food processing plants, and water supply intake points to implement protective actions within the EPZ.OROs use Federal resources as identified in the NRF Nuclear / Radiological Incident Amnex, and otherresources (e.g., compacts, nuclear insurers), if available. Evaluation of this criterion will take intoconsideration the level of Federal and other resources participating in the exercise.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of PlayCriterion 3.e.2: Appropriate measures, strategies, and pre-printed instructionalmaterial are developed for implementing protective action decisions for contaminatedwater, food products, milk, and agricultural production. ('NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1,G.1, J.9, 11)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a fidl-scale or finctional exercise, anactual event, or by means of drills conducted at aniy time.OROs must demonstrate the development of measures and strategies for implementation of ingestionexposure pathway EPZ protective actions by formulating protective action information for the generalpublic and food producers and processors. Demonstration of this criterion includes either pre-distributedpublic information material in the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ or the capability for rapidreproduction and distribution of appropriate reproduction-ready information and instructions to pre-determined individuals and businesses.OROs must also demonstrate the capability to control, restrict, or prevent distribution of contaminatedfood by conmmercial sectors. Exercise play must include demonstration of communications andcoordination among organizations to implement protective actions. Field play of implementationactivities may be simulated. For example, communications and coordination with agencies responsiblefor enforcing food controls within the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ must be demonstrated, but actualcommunications with food producers and processors may be simulated.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.234New Hamnshire Extent of Plav UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationSub-element 3.f- Implementation of Relocation, Re-entry, and Return DecisionsIntentThis Sub-element is derived firom NUREG-0654/FEA'I-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to implement plans, procedures, and decisions fir post-plume phase relocation,reentry, and return. Inplementation of these decisions is essential for protecting the public fromdirect long-term exposure to deposited radioactive materials firom a severe incident at acommercial NPP.Criterion 3.fh1: Decisions regarding controlled reentry of emergency workers andrelocation and return of the public during the post-plume phase are coordinated withappropriate organizations and implemented. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, E. 7;J.IO.j; J.12; K.5.b; M.1, 3)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a fidl-scale, firnctional, or tabletopexercise, an actual event, or by means of drills conducted at any time.Relocation: OROs must demonstrate the capability to coordinate and implement decisions concerningrelocation of individuals located in radiologically contaminated areas who were not previouslyevacuated. Such individuals must be relocated to an area(s) where radiological contamination will notexpose the general public to doses that exceed the relocation PAGs. OROs must also demonstrate thecapability to provide for short- or long-term relocation of evacuees who lived in an area(s) that hasresidual radiation levels above the (first-, second-, and 50-year) PAGs.Areas of consideration must include the capability of OROs to communicate with other OROs regardingtiming of actions, notification of the population of procedures for relocation, and notification of, andadvice for, evacuated individuals who will be converted to relocation status in situations where they willnot be able to return to their homes due to high levels of contamination. OROs must also demonstratethe capability to communicate instructions to the public regarding relocation decisions and intermediate-term housing for relocated persons.Reentry: OROs must demonstrate the capability to control reentry and exit of individuals who areauthorized by the ORO to temporarily reenter the restricted area during the post-plume (i.e.,intermediate or late) phase to protect them from unnecessary radiation exposure. OROs must alsodemonstrate the capability to control exit of vehicles and other equipment to control the spread ofcontamination outside the restricted area(s). Individuals without specific radiological response missions,such as farmers for animal care, essential utility service personnel, or other members of the public whomust reenter an evacuated area during the post-emergency phase must be limited to the lowestradiological exposure commensurate with completing their missions. Monitoring and decontaminationfacilities will be established as appropriate.Examples of control procedures are: (1) assignmnent of, or checking for, direct-reading and permanentrecord dosimetry for emergency workers; (2) questions regarding the individuals' objective(s), location(s)expected to be visited, and associated timeframes; (3) maps and plots of radiation exposure rates; (4)advice on areas to avoid; (5) procedures for exit, including monitoring of individuals, vehicles, andequipment; (6) decision criteria regarding contamination; (7) proper disposition of emergency workerdosimetry, and (8) maintenance of emergency worl3adiation exposure records.Return: OROs must demonstrate the capability to implement policies concerning return of members ofthe public to areas that were evacuated during the plume phase. OROs must demonstrate the capability UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/improvement Plan Seabrook Stationto identify and prioritize services and facilities that require restoration within a few days, and to identifyprocedures and resources for their restoration. Examples of these services and facilities are medical andsocial services, utilities, roads, and schools.Communication among OROs for relocation, reentry, and return may be simulated. All simulated oractual contacts must be documented. These discussions may be accomplished in a group setting.OROs must use Federal resources as identified in the NRF Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex, andother resources (e.g., compacts or nuclear insurers), if available. Evaluation of this criterion will take intoconsideration the level of Federal and other resources participating in the exercise.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of PlayEVALUATION AREA 4: Field Measurement and AnalysisSub-element 4.a -Plume Phase Field Measurements and AnalysesIntentThis Sub-element is derived firom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-], which requires that OROs havethe capability to deploy FMTs with the equipment, methods, and expertise necessary todetermine the location of airborne radiation and particulate deposition on the ground fiom anairborne plume. hI addition, NUREG-0654/FEMA -REP-] indicates that OROs must have thecapability to use FMTs within the plumne exposure pathway EPZ to detect airborne radioiodinein the presence of noble gases and radioactive particulate material in the airborne plume. In anincident at an NPP, the possible release of radioactive material may pose a risk to the nearbypopulation and environment. Although incident assessment methods are available to project theextent and magnitude of a release, these methods are subject to large uncertainties. During anincident, it is important to collect field radiological data to help characterize aniy radiologicalrelease. Adequate equipment and procedures are essential to such field measurement efforts.Criterion 4.a. 1: [RESERVED]Criterion 4.a.2: Field teams (2 or more) are managed to obtain sufficient informationto help characterize the release and to control radiation exposure.(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, C.1; H.12; L 7, 8, 11; J.1O.a)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a full-scale, functional,or tabletop exercise. Other means may include drills, seminars or training activities that wouldfidly demonstrate technical proficiency. 236 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/lmprovemnent PlanSeabrook StationResponsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to brief FMTs on predicted plume location anddirection, plume travel speed, and exposure control procedures before deployment. During an HABincident, the Field Team management must keep the incident command informed of field monitoringteams' activities and location. Coordination with FMTs and field monitoring may be demonstrated asout-of-sequence demonstrations, as negotiated in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Field measurements are needed to help characterize the release and support the adequacy ofimplemented protective actions, or to be a factor in modifying protective actions. Teams must be directedto take measurements at such locations and thnes as necessary to provide sufficient information tocharacterize the plume and its impacts.If the responsibility for obtaining peak measurements in the plume has been accepted by licensee fieldmonitoring teams, with concurrence from OROs, there is no requirement for these measurements to berepeated by ORO monitoring teams. If the licensee FMTs do not obtain peak measurements in the plume,it is the ORO's decision as to whether peak measurements are necessary to sufficiently characterize theplume. The sharing and coordination of plume measurement information among all FMTs (licensee,Federal, and ORO) is essential. Coordination concerning transfer of samples, including a chain-of-custodyform(s), to a radiological laboratory(ies) must be demonstrated.OROs must use Federal resources as identified in the NRF Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex andother resources (e.g., compacts or the licensee). Evaluation of this criterion will take into considerationthe level of Federal and other resources participating in the exercise.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of PlayCriterion 4.a.3: Ambient radiation measurements are made and recorded atappropriate locations, and radioiodine and particulate samples are collected. Teamswill move to an appropriate low background location to determine whether anysignificant (as specified in the plan and/or procedures) amount of radioactivity hasbeen collected on the sampling media. (NUREG-O654/FEMA-REP-1, C.1; H.12: L8,9; J.1O.a)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion mio~e accomplished during a full-scale, functional,or tabletop exercise. Other means may include drills, semnhars or training activities that wouldfilly demonstrate technical proficiency. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationTwo or more FMTs must demonstrate the capability to make and report measurements of ambientradiation to the field team coordinator, dose assessment team, or other appropriate authority. FMTs mustalso demonstrate the capability to obtain an air sample for measurement of airborne radioiodine andparticulates, and to provide the appropriate authority with field data pertaining to measurement. Ifsamples have radioactivity significantly above background, the authority must consider the need forexpedited laboratory analyses of these samples.OROs must share data in a timely manrner with all other appropriate OROs. All methodology, includingcontamination control, instrumentation, preparation of samples, and a chain-of-custody form(s) fortransfer to a laboratory(ies), will be in accordance with the ORO's plans / procedures.OROs must use Federal resources as identified in the NRF Nuclear/Radiological Incident Arnex andother resources (e.g., compacts or the licensee). Evaluation of this criterion will take into considerationthe level of Federal and other resources participating in the exercise.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of PlayNote: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates this sub-element unsatisfactorily, theFEMA Evaluator will inform the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or local organization, the FEMA Evaluator will provide the participantanother opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day.Sub-element 4.b -Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and SamplingIntentThis Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to assess the actual or potential magnitude and locations of radiological hazardsto determine the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ and to support relocation, reentty, and returndecisions. This Sub-element focuses on collecting environmental samples for laboratolyanalyses that are essential for decisions on protecting the public from contaminated food andwater and direct radiation from deposited materials.Criterion 4.b.1: The field teams (22g8 more) demonstrate the capability to makeappropriate measurements and to collect appropriate samples (e.g., food crops, milk,water, vegetation, and soil) to support adequate assessments and protective actiondecision making. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, C.1; 1.8; J.11) UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationExtent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion miiay be accomplished during a fidl-scale, fianctional, or tabletopexercise. Other means may include drills, seminars or training activities that would filly demonstrate technicalproficiency.The ORO's FMTs must demonstrate the capability to take measurements and samples, at such times andlocations as directed, to enable an adequate assessment of the ingestion pathway and to support reentry,relocation, and return decisions. When resources are available, use of aerial surveys and in-situ gammameasurement is appropriate. All methodology, including contamination control, instrumentation,preparation of samples, and chain-of-custody form(s) for transfer to a laboratory(ies), will be inaccordance with the ORO's plans / procedures.The FMTs and/or other sampling personnel must secure ingestion pathway samples from agriculturalproducts and water. Samples in support of relocation and return must be secured from soil, vegetation,and other surfaces in areas that received radioactive ground deposition.OROs must use Federal resources as identified in the NRF Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex andother resources (e.g., compacts, the licensee, or nuclear insurers). Evaluation of this criterion will takeinto consideration the level of Federal and other resources participating in the exercise.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of PlaySub-element 4.c -Laboratory OperationsIntentThis Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA4-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to perform laboratory analyses of radioactivity in air, liquid, and environmentalsamples to support protective action decision making.Criterion 4.c.1: The laboratory is capable of performing required radiologicalanalyses to support protective action decisions. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, C.1,3; J.11)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a full-scale, fitnctional, or tabletopexercise. Other means may include drills, seminars or training activities that would fidly demonstrate technicalproficiency.The laboratory staff must demonstrate the capability to follow appropriate procedures for receivingsamples, including logging information, preventing contamination of the laboratory(ies), preventingbuildup of background radiation due to stored arles, preventing cross contamination of samples,preserving samples that may spoil (e.g., milk), al-eeping track of sample identity. In addition, thelaboratory staff must demonstrate the capability to prepare samples for conducting measurements. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationThe laboratory(ies) must be appropriately equipped to provide, upon request, timely analyses of media ofsufficient quality and sensitivity to support assessments and decisions anticipated in the ORO's plans /procedures. The laboratory instrument calibrations must be traceable to standards provided by theNational Institute of Standards and Technology. Laboratory methods used to analyze typicalradionuclides released in a reactor incident must be as described in the plans / procedures. New orrevised methods may be used to analyze atypical radionuclide releases (e.g., transuranics or as a result ofa terrorist incident) or if warranted by incident circumstances. Analysis may require resources beyondthose of the ORO.The laboratory staff must be qualified in radio-analytical techniques and contamination controlprocedures.OROs must use Federal resources as identified in the NRF Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex andother resources (e.g., compacts, the licensee, or nuclear insurers). Evaluation of this criterion will takeinto consideration the level of Federal and other resources participating in the exercise.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of PlayEVALUATION AREA 5: Emergency Notification and Public InformationSub-element 5.a -Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification SystemIntentThis Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to provide prompt instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathwayEPZ. Specific provisions addressed in this Sub-element are derived from the Guide for theEvaluation of Alert and Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, FEMA-REP-IO(November 1985).Criterion 5.a.1: Activities associated with primary alerting and notification of thepublic are completed in a timely manner following the initial decision by authorizedoffsite emergency officials to notify the public of an emergency situation. The initialinstructional message to the public must include as a mininium the elements requiredby current REP guidance. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, E.5, 6, 7)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demtonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a-fidl-scale or fiuctional exercise, drills,or operational testing qf equipment that would fidly demonstrate capabilijy.Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capabilit214sequentially provide an alert signal followed by aninitial instructional message to populated areas (permanent resident and transient) throughout the 10-mile plume EPZ. Following the decision to activate the alert and notification system, OROs mustcomplete system activation for primary alert / notification and disseminate the information / instructionsin a timely manner. For exercise purposes, timely is defined as with a sense of urgency and without UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationundue delay. If message dissemination is identified as not having been accomplished in a timely manner,the evaluator(s) will document a specific delay or cause as to why a message was not considered timely.Procedures to broadcast the message must be fully demonstrated as they would in an actual emergencyup to the point of transmission. Broadcast of the message(s) or test message(s) is not required. Theprocedures must be demonstrated up to the point of actual activation. The alert signal activation shouldbe simulated, not performed. Evaluations of EAS broadcast stations may also be accomplished throughSAVs.The capability of the primary notification system to broadcast an instructional message on a 24-hourbasis must be verified during an interview with appropriate personnel from the primary notificationsystem, including verification of provisions for backup power or an alternate station.The initial message must include at a minimum the following elements:* Identification of the ORO responsible and the official with authority for providing the alert signaland instructional message;" Identification of the commercial NPP and a statement that an emergency exists there;" Reference to REP-specific emergency information (e.g., brochures, calendars, and/or informationin telephone books) for use by the general public during an emergency;* A closing statement asking that the affected and potentially affected population stay tuned foradditional information, or that the population tune to another station for additional information.If route alerting is demonstrated as a primary method of alert and notification, it must be done inaccordance with the ORO's plans / procedures and the Extent-of-Play Agreement. OROs mustdemonstrate the capability to accomplish the primary route alerting in a timely manner (not subject tospecific time requirements). At least one route needs to be demonstrated and evaluated. The selectedroute(s) must vary from exercise to exercise. However, the most difficult route(s) must be demonstratedno less than once every 8 years. All alert and notification activities along the route(s) must be simulated(that is, the message that would actually be used is read for the evaluator, but not actually broadcast) asnegotiated in the extent of play. Actual testing of the mobile public address system will be conducted atan agreed-upon location.OROs may demonstrate any means of primary alert and notification included in their plans / proceduresas negotiated in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of Play UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCriterion 5. a. 2: [RESER VED]Criterion 5.a.3: Backup alert and notification of the public is completed within areasonable time following the detection by the ORO of a failure of the primary alertand notification system. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, E. 6, Appendix 3.B.2.c)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a full-scale orfunctional exercise, drills, or operational testing qf equipment that would fully demonstratecapability.If the exercise scenario calls for failure of any portion of the primary system(s) or if any portion of theprimary system(s) actually fails to function during the exercise, OROs must demonstrate backup meansof alert and notification. Backup means of alert and notification will differ from facility to facility.Backup alert and notification procedures that would be implemented in multiple stages must bestructured such that the population closest to the plant (e.g., within 2 miles) is alerted and notified first.The populations farther away and downwind of any potential radiological release would be coveredsequentially (e.g., 2 to 5 miles, followed by downwind 5 to 10 miles, and finally the remaining populationas directed by authorities). Topography, population density, existing ORO resources, and timing will beconsidered in judging the acceptability of backup means of alert and notification.Although circumstances may not allow this for all situations, FEMA and the NRC recommend that OROsand operators attempt to establish backup means that will reach those hi the plume exposure EPZ withina reasonable time of failure of the primary alert and notification system, with a reconmmended goal of 45minutes. The backup alert message must, at a minimum, include (1) a statement that an emergency existsat the plant and (2) instructions regarding where to obtain additional information.If backup route alerting is demonstrated, only one route needs to be selected and demonstrated. All alertand notification activities along the route(s) must be simulated (that is, the message that would actuallybe used is read for the evaluator, but not actually broadcast), as negotiated in the extent of play. Actualtesting of the mobile public address system will be conducted at an agreed-upon location.OROs may demonstrate any means of backup alert and notification included in their plans / proceduresas negotiated in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of PlayCriterion 5.a.4: Activities associated with FEMA-approved exception areas (whereapplicable) are completed in a timely manner following the initial decision byauthorized offsite emergency officials 4-eotify the public of an emergency situation.(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, E. 6; Appendix 3.B.2.c) UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationExtent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a fill-scale orfinctional exercise, drills, or operational testing of equipmnent that would fully demonstratecapability.OROs with FEMA-approved exception areas (identified in the approved Alert and Notification SystemDesign Report), 5 to 10 miles from the NPP, must demonstrate the capability to accomplish primaryalerting and notification of the exception area(s). FEMA and the NRC recommend that OROs andoperators establish means that will reach those in approved exception areas in a timely manner, with arecommended goal of 45 minutes, once the initial decision is made by authorized offsite emergencyofficials to notify the public of an incident. The exception area alert message must, at a minimum, include(1) a statement that an emergency exists at the plant and (2) instructions regarding where to obtainadditional information.For exception area alerting, at least one route must be demonstrated and evaluated. The selected route(s)must vary from exercise to exercise. However, the most difficult route(s) must be demonstrated no lessthan once every 8 years. All alert and notification activities along the route(s) must be simulated (that is,the message that would actually be used is read for the evaluator, but not actually broadcasted) asnegotiated in the extent of play. Actual testing of the mobile public address system will be conducted atan agreed-upon location. For exception areas alerted by aircraft, actual flights will be negotiated in theextent of play, but must be demonstrated no less than once every 8 years.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of PlaySub-element 5.b -Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the MediaIntentThis Sub-element is derived fiom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to disseminate appropriate emergency information and instructions, including anyrecommended protective actions, to the public. In addition, NUREG-0654/FEAA -REP-Irequires OROs to ensure that the capability exists for providing information to the media. Thisincludes the availability qf a physical location for use by the media during an emergency.NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 also provides that a system must be available for dealing withrumors. This system will hereafter be known as the "public inquily hotline.Criterion 5.b.1: OROs provide accurate subsequent entergency information andinstructions to the public and the news media in a timely manner.(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, E.5, 7; G.3.a, G.4.a, c)Extent of Play243Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a full-scale orfinctional exercise, or drills. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationThe responsible ORO personnel / representatives must demonstrate actions to provide emergencyinformation and instructions to the public and media in a timely manner following the initial alert andnotification (not subject to specific time requirements). For exercise purposes, timely is defined as with asense of urgency and without undue delay. If message dissemination is identified as not having beenaccomplished in a timely manner, the evaluator(s) will document a specific delay or cause as to why amessage was not considered timely.Message elements: The ORO must ensure that emergency information and instructions are consistentwith PADs made by appropriate officials. The emergency information must contain all necessary andapplicable instructions (e.g., evacuation instructions, evacuation routes, reception center locations, whatto take when evacuating, shelter-in-place instructions, information concerning protective actions forschools and persons with disabilities and access / functional needs, and public inquiry hotlinetelephone number) to assist the public in carrying out the PADs provided. The ORO must also beprepared to disclose and explain the ECL of the incident. At a minimum, this information must beincluded in media briefings and/or media releases. OROs must demonstrate the capability to uselanguage that is clear and understandable to the public within both the plume and ingestion exposurepathway EPZs. This includes demonstration of the capability to use familiar landmarks and boundariesto describe protective action areas.The emergency information must be all-inclusive by including the four items specified under exerciseDemonstration Criterion 5.a.1 and previously identified protective action areas that are still valid, as wellas new areas. The OROs must demonstrate the capability to ensure that emergency information that is nolonger valid is rescinded and not repeated by broadcast media.In addition, the OROs must demonstrate the capability to ensure that current emergency information isrepeated at pre-established intervals in accordance with the plans / procedures. OROs must demonstratethe capability to develop emergency information in a non-English language when required by the plans /procedures.If ingestion pathway measures are exercised, OROs must demonstrate that a system exists for rapiddissemination of ingestion pathway information to pre-determined individuals and businesses inaccordance with the ORO's plans / procedures.Media information: OROs must demonstrate the capability to provide timely, accurate, concise, andcoordinated information to the news media for subsequent dissemination to the public. This wouldinclude demonstration of the capability to conduct timely and pertinent media briefings and distributemedia releases as the incident warrants. The OROs must demonstrate the capability to respondappropriately to inquiries from the news media. All information presented in media briefings andreleases must be consistent with PADs and other emergency information provided to the public. Copiesof pertinent emergency information (e.g., EAS messages and media releases) and media information kitsmust be available for dissemination to the media.Public inquiry: OROs must demonstrate that an effective system is in place for dealing with callsreceived via the public inquiry hotline. Hotline staff must demonstrate the capability to provide or obtainaccurate information for callers or refer them to appropriate information source. Information from thehotline staff, including information that corrects false or inaccurate information when trends are noted,must be included, as appropriate, in emergency information provided to the public, media briefings,and/or media releases.HAB considerations: The dissemination of information dealing with specific aspects of NPP securitycapabilities, actual or perceived adversarial (terrorist) force or threat, and tactical law enforcementresponse must be coordinated / communicated with appropriate security authorities, e.g., lawenforcement and NPP security agencies, in accordA44with ORO plans / procedures.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationNew Hampshire Extent of PlayNote: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates this sub-element unsatisfactorily, theFEMA Evaluator will inform the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or local organization, the FEMA Evaluator will provide the participantanother opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day.EVALUATION AREA 6: Support Operation/FacilitiesSub-element 6.a -Monitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of EvacueesIntentThis Sub-element is derived firom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-], which requires that OROs havethe capability to implement radiological mo24kting and decontamination of evacuees, whileminimizing contamination of the facility. OROs must also have the capability to identify andregister evacuees at reception centers. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCriterion 6.a.1: The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequateresources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, andregistration of evacuees. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, A.3; C.4; J.1O.h; J.12)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be acconiplished dnring a finl-scale or finctional exercise, drills,or SAV.Radiological monitoring, decontamination, and registration facilities for evacuees must be set up anddemonstrated as they would be in an actual emergency or as indicated in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.OROs conducting this demonstration must have one-third of the resources (e.g., monitoring teams /instrumentation / portal monitors) available at the facility(ies) as necessary to monitor 20 percent of thepopulation within a 12-hour period. This would include adequate space for evacuees' vehicles.Availability of resources can be demonstrated with valid documentation (e.g., MOU/LOA, etc.) reflectinghow necessary equipment would be procured for the location. Plans / procedures must indicateprovisions for service animals.Before using monitoring instrument(s), the monitor(s) must demonstrate the process of checking theinstrument(s) for proper operation. Staff responsible for the radiological monitoring of evacuees mustdemonstrate the capability to attain and sustain, within about 12 hours, a monitoring productivity rateper hour needed to monitor the 20 percent EPZ population planning base. The monitoring productivityrate per hour is the number of evacuees that can be monitored, per hour, by the total complement ofmonitors using an appropriate procedure. For demonstration of monitoring, decontamination, andregistration capabilities, a minimum of six evacuees must be monitored per station using equipment andprocedures specified in the plans / procedures. The monitoring sequences for the first six simulatedevacuees per monitoring team will be timed by the evaluators to determine whether the 12-hourrequirement can be met.OROs must demonstrate the capability to register evacuees upon completion of the monitoring anddecontamination activities. The activities for recording radiological monitoring and, if necessary,decontamination must include establishing a registration record consisting of the evacuee's name,address, results of monitoring, and time of decontamination (if any), or as otherwise designated in theplan and/or procedures. Audio recorders, camcorders, or written records are all acceptable means forregistration.Monitoring activities shall not be simulated. Monitoring personnel must explain use of trigger / actionlevels for determining the need for decontamination. They must also explain the procedures for referringany evacuees who cannot be adequately decontaminated for assessment and follow-up in accordancewith the ORO's plans / procedures. Contamination of the evacuee(s) will be determined by controllerinject and not simulated with any low-level radiation source. All activities must be based on the plans /procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwisespecified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Decontamination of evacuees may be simulated and conducted by interview. Provisions for separateshowering and same-sex monitoring must be demonstrated or explained. The staff must demonstrateprovisions for limiting the spread of contamination. Provisions could include floor coverings, signs, andappropriate means (e.g., partitions, roped-off areas) to separate uncontaminated from potentiallycontaminated areas. Provisions must also exist to separate contaminated and uncontaminated evacuees,provide changes of clothing for those with contaminated clothing; and store contaminated clothing andpersonal belongings to prevent further contamili46n of evacuees or facilities. In addition, for anyevacuee found to be contaminated, procedures must be discussed concerning handling of potentialcontamination of vehicles and personal belongings. Waste water from decontamination operations doesnot need to be collected. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationIndividuals who have completed monitoring (and decontamination, if needed) must have means (e.g.,hand stamp, sticker, bracelet, form, etc) indicating that they, and their service animals and vehicles,where applicable, have been monitored, cleared, and found to have no contamination or contaminationbelow the trigger / action level.In accordance with plans / procedures, individuals found to be clean after monitoring do not need tohave their vehicle monitored. These individuals do not require confirmation that their vehicle is freefrom contamination prior to entering the congregate care areas.However, those individuals who are found to be contaminated and are then decontaminated will havetheir vehicles impounded or monitored and decontaminated (if applicable) and do require confirmationthat their vehicle is impounded or free from contamination prior to entering the congregate care areas.New Hampshire Extent of PlayNote: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates this sub-element unsatisfactorily, theFEMA Evaluator will inform the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or local organization, the FEMA Evaluator will provide the participantanother opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day.Sub-element 6.b -Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Worker EquipmentIntentThis Sub-element is derived fiom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to implement radiological monitoring and decontamination of emergency workersand their equipment, inclusive of vehicles.Criterion 6.b.1: The facility/ORO has adequate procedures and resources toaccomplish monitoring and decontamination of emergency workers and theirequipment and vehicles. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, K.5.a, b)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a full-scale orfinctional exercise, drills, or SA VThe monitoring staff must demonstrate the capability to monitor emergency worker personnel and theirequipment and vehicles for contamination in accordance with the ORO's plans / procedures.247Specific attention must be given to equipment, including any vehicles that were in contact withcontamination. The monitoring staff must demonstrate the capability to make decisions on the need fordecontamination of personnel, equipment, and vehicles based on trigger/action levels and procedures UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/improvement Plan Seabrook Stationstated in the ORO plans / procedures. Monitoring of emergency workers does not have to meet the 12-hour requirement. However, appropriate monitoring procedures must be demonstrated for a minimumof two emergency workers and their equipment and vehicles. Before using monitoring instrument(s), themonitor(s) must demonstrate the process of checking the instrument(s) for proper operation.The area to be used for monitoring and decontamination must be set up as it would be in an actualemergency, with all route markings, instrumentation, record keeping, and contamination controlmeasures in place. Monitoring procedures must be demonstrated for a minimum of one vehicle. It isgenerally not necessary to monitor the entire surface of vehicles. However, the capability to monitorareas such as radiator grills, bumpers, wheel wells, tires, and door handles must be demonstrated.Interior surfaces of vehicles that were in contact with contaminated individuals must also be checked.Decontam-ination of emergency workers may be simulated and conducted via interview. Provisions forseparate showering and same-sex monitoring must be demonstrated or explained. The staff mustdemonstrate provisions for limiting the spread of contamination. Provisions could include floorcoverings, signs, and appropriate means (e.g., partitions, roped-off areas) to separate uncontaminatedfrom potentially contaminated areas. Provisions must also exist to separate contaminated anduncontaminated individuals where applicable; provide changes of clothing for those with contaminatedclothing; and store contaminated clothing and personal belongings to prevent further contamination ofemergency workers or facilities.Monitoring activities shall not be simulated. Monitoring personnel must explain use of trigger/actionlevels for determining the need for decontamination. They must also explain the procedures for referringany emergency workers who cannot be adequately decontaminated for assessment and follow-up inaccordance with the ORO's plans / procedures. Contamination of the individual(s) will be determinedby controller inject and not simulated with any low-level radiation source.Decontamination capabilities and provisions for vehicles and equipment that cannot be successfullydecontaminated may be simulated and conducted by interview. Waste water from decontaminationoperations does not need to be collected.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of PlayNote: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates this sub-element unsatisfactorily, theFEMA Evaluator will inform the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or local organization, the FIrJjA Evaluator will provide the participantanother opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day. UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationSub-element 6.c -Temporary Care of EvacueesIntentThis Sub-element is derivedfromn NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-], which requires OROs to have thecapability to establish relocation centers in host / support jurisdictions. The American RedCross normally provides congregate care in support of OROs under existing letters ofagreement.Criterion 6. c. 1: Managers of congregate care facilities demonstrate that the centershave resources to provide services and accommodations consistent with American RedCross planning guidelines. Managers demonstrate the procedures to assure thatevacuees have been monitored for contamination and have been decontaminated asappropriate prior to entering congregate care facilities. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1,J.1O.h, J12)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion mnay be accomplished during a fidl-scale orfinctional exercise, drills, or SA V.The evaluator must conduct a walk-through of the center to determine, through observation andinquiries, that the services and accommodations are consistent with applicable guidance.For planning purposes, OROs must plan for a sufficient number of congregate care centers in host /support jurisdictions to acconunodate a minimum of 20 percent of the EPZ population. In thissimulation, it is not necessary to set up operations as they would be in an actual emergency.Alternatively, capabilities may be demonstrated by setting up stations for various services and providingthose services to simulated evacuees. Given the substantial differences between demonstration andsimulation of this criterion, exercise demonstration expectations must be clearly specified in Extent-of-Play Agreements.Congregate care staff must also demonstrate the capability to ensure that evacuees, service animals, andvehicles have been monitored for contamination, decontaminated as appropriate, and registered beforeentering the facility.Individuals arriving at congregate care facilities must have means (e.g., hand stamp, sticker, bracelet,form, etc.) indicating that they, and their service animals and vehicles, where applicable, have beenmonitored, cleared, and found to have no contamination or contamination below the trigger / actionlevel.In accordance with plans / procedures, individuals found to be clean after monitoring do not need tohave their vehicle monitored. These individuals do not need confirmation that their vehicle is free fromcontamination prior to entering the congregate care areas.However, those individuals who are found to be contaminated and are then decontaminated will havetheir vehicles monitored and decontaminated (if applicable) and does need confirmation that their vehicleis free from contamination prior to entering the congregate care areas. This capability may be determinedthrough an interview process. 249If operations at the center are demonstrated, material that would be difficult or expensive to transport(e.g., cots, blankets, sundries, and large-scale food supplies) need not be physically available at the UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/lmprovemnent Plan Seabrook Stationfacility(ies). However, availability of such items must be verified by providing the evaluator a list ofsources with locations and estimates of quantities.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of PlaySub-element 6.d -Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured IndividualsIntentThis Sub-element is derived fiom NUREG-0654/FEMA -REP-i which requires that OROs havethe capabilit, to transport contaminated injured individuals to medical facilities with thecapability to provide medical semvices.Criterion 6.d.l: The facilit./ORO has the appropriate space, adequate resources, andtrained personnel to provide transport, monitoring, decontamination, and medicalservices to contaminated injured individuals. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, F.2;H.10; K.S.a, b; L.1, 4)Extent of PlayAssessnitent of this Demnoustration Criterion mtay be accomtplished during a full-scale or functional exercise, ordrills.Monitoring, decontamination, and contamination control efforts must not delay urgent medical care forthe victim. OROs must demonstrate the capability to transport contaminated injured individuals tomedical facilities.An ambulance must be used for response to the victim. However, to avoid taking an ambulance out ofservice for an extended time, OROs may use any vehicle (e.g., car, truck, or van) to transport the victim tothe medical facility. Normal communications between the ambulance/dispatcher and the receivingmedical facility must be demonstrated. If a substitute vehicle is used for transport to the medical facility,this conununication must occur before releasing the ambulance from the drill. This communicationwould include reporting radiation monitoring results, if available. In addition, the ambulance crew mustdemonstrate, by interview, knowledge of where the ambulance and crew would be monitored anddecontaminated, if required, or whom to contact for such information.Monitoring of the victim may be performed before transport or en route, or may be deferred to themedical facility. Before using monitoring instruments, the monitor(s) must demonstrate the process ofchecking the instrument(s) for proper operation. All monitoring activities must be completed as theywould be in an actual emergency. Appropriate contamination control measures must be demonstratedbefore and during transport and at the receiving medical facility.The medical facility must demonstrate the capability to activate and set up a radiological emergency areafor treatment. Equipment and supplies must 0Advailable for treatment of contaminated injuredindividuals.The medical facility must demonstrate the capability to make decisions on the need for decontaminationof the individual, follow appropriate decontamination procedures, and maintain records of all survey UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationmeasurements and samples taken. All procedures for collection and analysis of samples anddecontamination of the individual must be demonstrated or described to the evaluator. Waste waterfrom decontamination operations must be handled according to facility plans / procedures.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.New Hampshire Extent of Play251 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook Station252 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationMASSACHUSETTSEVALUATION AREAS AND EXTENT OF PLAYSEABROOK NUCLEAR POWER STATION HOSTILE ACTION BASED EXERCISENovember 5, 2014OverviewThe following organizations/locations will demonstrate in 2014:State Emer2ency Operations CenterMassachusetts Emergency Management AgencyMassachusetts Department of Public HealthMassachusetts State PoliceMassachusetts Department of TransportationMassachusetts National GuardMassachusetts Department of Mental HealthMass 2-1-1 Call CenterAmerican Red CrossFederal Emergency Management Agency Region INextEra Energy Seabrook Station LiaisonRe2ion I Emergency Operations CenterMassachusetts Emergency Management Agency -Region IMassachusetts State Police -Troop AMassDOTMassachusetts Department of Mental HealthAmerican Red CrossCentral Medical Emergency Direction (C-Med)Region I EOC Volunteer StaffRACES Volunteer StaffEmerg~ency Operations FacilityMassachusetts Emergency Management AgencyMassachusetts Department of Public Health/Radiation Control ProgramNextEra Energy Seabrook StationRadiolo2ical Field Monitoring and Samplin2 TeamsMassachusetts Department of Public Health/Radiation Control ProgramNextEra Energy Seabrook StationJoint Information CenterMassachusetts Emergency Management AgencyNextEra Energy Seabrook StationEAS Radio StationWBZ 1030 AM253OVA DDnnfl Cr A ink; Ui AD 1A I A CVTCTT flC ft A Vn___ I -CAIIA1 A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station.,' " .".... .` ...C Risk JurisdictionsAmesbury EOCMerrimac EOCNewbury EOCNewburyport EOCSalisbury EOCWest Newbury EOCSupport JurisdictionsThe following demonstrations will be conducted out of sequence during TBDState Police Troop A, Danvers: TBDThe following organizations/locations will NOT demonstrate in 2014:MassDOT, Scotland Rd, Newbury -demonstrated November 2008State Transportation Staging Area -demonstrated June 2010Local Transportation Staging Areas -demonstrated June 2010Masconomet Reception Center -demonstrated June 2008NOTE: There is standing FEMA umbrella approval for "On the Spot"Note: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates sub-element 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1,3.d.1, 3.d.2, 4.a.3, 4.b.1 or 5.b.1, 6.a.1 and 6.b.1 unsatisfactorily, the FEMA Evaluator willinform the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or localorganization, the FEMA Evaluator will provide the participant another opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day.254CC A Dnnný Cý A ý AD -I A --- -nT A ý.--- I _ý A I UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/improvement Plan Seabrook StationEVALUATION AREA 1: Einergency Operations ManagemnentSub-element L.a -MobilizationIntentThis Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to alert, notify, and mobilize emergency personnel, and activate and staffemergency facilities.Criterion L.a.1: OROs use effective procedures to alert, notify, and mobilize emergencypersonnel and activate facilities in a timely manner. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1,A.L.a, A.1.e, A.3, A.4; C.1, C.4, C.6; D.3, D.4; E.1, E.2; H.3, H.4)Extent of PlayResponsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to receive notification of an incident from thelicensee; verify the notification; and contact, alert, and mobilize key emergency personnel in a timelymanner and demonstrate the ability to maintain and staff 24-hour operations. Twenty-four-houroperations can be demonstrated during the exercise via rosters or shift changes or otherwise in an actualactivation. Local responders must demonstrate the ability to receive and/or initiate notification to thelicensees or other respective emergency management organizations of an incident in a tinely manner,when they receive information fr0om the licensee or alternate sources. Responsible OROs mustdemonstrate the activation offacilities for immediate use by mobilized personnel upon their arrival.Activation Offacilities and staff, including those associated with the Incident Command System, must becompleted in accordance with ORO plans/procedures. The location and contact infbrmnation for facilitiesincluded in the incident command must be available to all appropriate responding agencies and the NPPafter these.facilities have been activated.Pre-staging of emergency personnel is appropriate, in accordance with the Extent-of-Play Agreement,at those facilities located beyond a normal conunuting distance fiom the individual's duty location orresidence. This could include the staggered release of resources from an assembly area. Additionally,pre-staging ofstafffor out-of-sequence demonstrations may be used in accordance with the Extent-of-Play Agreement.The REP program does not evaluate Incident Commnand Post tactical operations (e.g., Law Enforcementhostile action suppression techniques), only coordination among the incident command, the utility, andall appropriate OROs, pursuant to plans/procedures.Initial law enforcement, fire service, HAZMA T, and emergency medical response to the NPP site mayimpact the ability to staff REP fiuctions. The ability to identifi, and request additional resources oridentify compensatomy measures must be demonstrated. Exercises must also address the role of mnutualaid in the incident, as appropriate. An integral part of the response to an HAB scenario at an NPP mayalso be within the auspices of the Federal Government (e.g., FBI, NRC, or DHS). Protocols forrequesting Federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement support must be demonstrated asappropriate. Any resources must be on the ORO's mobilization list so they can be contacted during anincident, if needed.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actualemergency, unless noted above or otherwise specijk&5n the Extent-of-Play Agreement.CC ý ..nnI 01-n- -A. 'A I ý C11C.11 n. .1 A -.--- I -r-I., ý UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationMassachusetts Extent of PlayThe notification process for state and local responders will be completed, and call down rosterskwill be shown to the FEMA Evaluator.State.EOC: -Massachusetts Emergency Management (MEMA) SEOC emergency staff,.including the Massachusetts Emergency Support Functions Team staff (MassachusettsýDepartment of Public Health (MDPH), Massachusetts Department of Transportation,,(MassDOT), Massachusetts Department of Mental Health (MDMH), Massachusetts State Police.(MSP), Massachusetts Army National Guard (MANG), and American Red Cross (ARC), theiState Public Information Line staff, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and:the Seabrook Nuclear Power Station Liaison...KThe MASS 211 Call Center will be activated for an event at Seabrook Station..Region I EOC-MEMA Region I EOC( Laffand emergency volunteer staff.Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) -Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency(MEMA) and Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH).Joint Information Center (JIC) -The JIC may be pre-staged. Although it is possible that a"Virtual JIC" may be opened at MEMA's SEOC for a HAB incident.NIAT Field Monitoring Team Personnel: Field Team personnel will be in the area awaitingnotification.,bOnce notified to report, they will use a compressed time: 10 minutes/hour ofnormal travel response time.Community EOCs: Due to time constrainht Municipalities may .pre-stage their.. personnel foriIHABI exercisesý Evaluator will conductan interview of how tae miunicipality would activate.Transportation Providers -Calls will be made to five transportation providers to verify thecontact information and resources (drivers and vehicles) under the LOA. A Controller messageZ*will provide the number of vehicles and drivers available for exercise play. No vehicles orpersonnel will be m obilized. ............... .... ..Sub-elente Facilit'ies. .IntentThis sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which provides that OffsiteResponse Organizations (ORO) have facilities to support the emergency response.Criterion 1.b.1: Facilities are sufficient to support the emnergency response. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, H.3; G.3.a; J.1O.h; J.12; K.S.b)Extent of Play256Responsible OROs must demonstrate, no less than once evejy eight years, the availability offacilities tosupport accomplishment of emergency operations (this includes all alternate and backup facilities).Evaluations are typically pem formed for EOCs and JICs, as well as other facilities such as-~lflll CATfK U A. 1.l1 Cý n~ flC .ly A'-- A _C -' UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationreception/relocation centers. Some of the areas evaluated within the facilities are adequate space,furnishings, lighting, restrooms, ventilation, access to backup power, and/or alternate facility, if requiredto supportoperations. Radio stations, laboratories, initial warning points and hospitals are not evaluated under1.b.1.In addition, facilities will be evaluated for this criterion during the first biennial exercise after any new orsubstantial changes in structure, equipment, or mission that affect key capabilities, as outlined inrespective emergency plans/procediures. A substantial change is one that has a direct effect or impact onemergency response operations performed in those facilities. Examples of substantial changes include.-mnodiýf..ing the size or configuration of an emergency operations center, adding more function to a center,or changing the equipment available for use in a center.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actualemergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-qf-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayCommunities will demonstrate this criteria during federal evaluation (generally once per 8 year.cycle) unless new or substantial improvements occur. All EPZ EOCs, as well as MEMA'sRegion I EOC will be evaluated during this exercise. MEMA's State EOC has been evaluated,during the Pilgrim Exercise on April 30, 20.14.The Incident Command Post will not be evaluated with this criteria during this Hostile Action:Based Exer cise. .ISub-element 1.c -Direction and ControlIntentThis sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-J, which provides that OffsiteResponse Organizations (ORO) have the capability to control their overall response to anemergency.Criterion 1.c.l: Key personnel with leadership roles for the ORO provide direction andcontrol to that part of the overall response effort for which they are responsible.(NUREG-0654, A.l.d; A.2.a, b; A.3; C.4, 6)Extent of PlayLeadership personnel must demonstrate the ability to cart)' out the essential management functions of theresponse effort (e.g., keeping staff informed through periodic briefings and/or other means, coordinatingwith other OROs, and ensuring comnpletion of requirements and requests.) Leadership must demonstratethe ability to prioritize resource tasking and replace/supplement resources (e.g., through MOUs or otheragreements) when faced with competing demands for finite resources. Any resources identified throughLOA/MOUs must be on the ORO's mobilization list so they) may be contacted during an incident, ifneeded.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actualemergency, unless noted above or otherwise specifq.-p7 the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayCC ý ..nnl C- -n- -ý In I I n. -A -In, A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationIf a comrmunity is directed to evyacuate, EOC personinel Will demonstrate continuity of governilent.through a discussioni oflogjstics withthe FEMI AEvaluator. Closing of the local EOC and relocation will*be simulated..........FSub-element Ld Communications EquimentIntentThis Sub-elemnent is derived firom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs establish andoperate reliable primat3, and backup communication systems to ensure communications with keyemergency personnel at locations such as contiguous governments within the EPZ, Federal emergencyresponse organizations, the licensee and its facilities, EOCs, Incident Command Posts., and FMTs.Criterion 1.d.1: At least two communication systems are available, at least one operatesproperly, and communication links are established and maintained with appropriatelocations. Communications capabilities are managed in support of emergencyoperations. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, F.1, 2)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion is accomplished initially in a baseline evaluation andsubsequently in periodic testing and drills. System familiarity and use must be demonstrated as applicablein biennial or tabletop exercise, or if their use would be required, during an actual eventOROs must de/nonstrate that a pri/na/y system, and at least one backup system for fixed facilities, is fullyfuictional at all ti/nes. Comm/nun ications syste/ns are maintained and tested on a recurring basisthroughout the assess//ent period and svste/i status is available to all operators. Periodic test results andcorrective actions are maintained on a real ti/ne basis. If a communications syste/n or syste/ns are notfinctional, but exercise pe/formance is not affected, no exercise issue will be assessed.Co/i/nunications equipment and procedures for facilities and field units are used as needed fortrans/nission and receipt of exercise /nessages. Allfacilities, FMTs, and incident co/n/nand /nust have thecapability to access at least one co/n/nu/ication system that is independent of the commercial telephonesystem. Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to manage the commnunication systems andensure that all message traffic is handled without delays that /night disrupt emergency operations. OROsmust ensure that a coordinated communication link for fixed and mobile medical support facilities exists.Exercise scenarios mai' require the failure of a communication system and use of an alternate system, asnegotiated in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.A ll activities /nust be based 0/i the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actualemergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-o f-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of Play.Contact with locations not playing will be simulated. See Extent of Play Overview for the listingof facilities that will be playing during the exercise (pages 173).258NOTE: "On the Spot" corrections approved tor the fore mentioned sub-element. That portionof the evaluation element relating to both the proper functionality of comnmunications systems-IZ Dý~l -CT -rf--1 -I ID II A -~Tl~ .lC At -ýn I A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationand the proper use of those systems. This portion of the criterion that deals with performanceNote: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates this sub-element unsatisfactorily, theFEMA Evaluator will inform the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or local organization, the FEMA Evaluator will provide the participantanother opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day.Sub-element Le -Equipment and Supplies to Support OperationsIntentThis sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which provides that Offsite ResponseOrganizations (ORO) have emergency equipment and supplies adequate to support the emergencyresponse.Criterion I.e.1: Equipment, maps, displays, dosimetty, potassium iodide (K[), and othersupplies are sufficient to support emergency operations. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, H. 7,10; I. 7, 8, 9; J.O.a, b, e; J.11, 12; K.3.a; K.5.b)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion is accomplished primarily through a baseline evaluation andsubsequent periodic inspections.A particular facility's equipment and supplies must be sufficient and consistent with that facility'sassigned role in the ORO's emergency operations plans. Use of maps and other displays is encouraged.For non-facility-based operations, the equipment and supplies must be sufficient and consistent with theassigned operational role. At locations where traffic and access control personnel are deployed,appropriate equipment (e.g., vehicles, barriers, traffic cones, and signs) must be available, or theiravailability described.Specific equipment and supplies that must be demonstrated under this criterion include KI inventories,dosimetry, and monitoring equipment, as follows:KI: Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to maintain inventories of KI sufficient for useby: (1) emergency workers; (2) institutionalized individuals, as indicated in capacity lists for facilities;and (3) where stipulated by the plans / procedures, members of the general public (including transients)within the plume pathway EPZ. In addition, OROs must demonstrate provisions to make KI available tospecialized response teams (e.g., civil support team, Special Weapons and Tactics Teams, urban searchand rescue, bomb squads, HAZMAT, or other ancillary groups) as identified in plans / procedures). Theplans / procedures must include the forms to be used for documenting emergency worker ingestion of KI,as well as a mechanism for identifying emergency workers that have declined KI in advance. Considercarefully the placement of emergency workers that have declined KI in advance.ORO quantities of dosimetry and KI available and storage locations(s) will be confirmed by physicalinspection at the storage location(s) or through documentation of current inventory submitted during theexercise, provided in the ALC submission, and/or Z-o~i~ed during an SAV. Available supplies of KI mustbe within the expiration date indicated on KI bottles or blister packs. As an alternative, the ORO mayproduce a letter from a certified private or state laboratory indicating that the KI supply remains potent, inaccordance with U.S. Pharmacopoeia standards.VU ADDflCAV QCTA TnXT Ui AD Sn I A UCVTUITý fV DT A Un--- ý -CAIIAI A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationDosimetry: Sufficient quantities of appropriate direct-reading and permanent record dosimetry anddosimeter chargers must be available for issuance to all emergency workers who will be dispatched toperform an ORO mission. In addition, OROs must demonstrate provisions to make dosimetry availableto specialized response teams (e.g., civil support team, Special Weapons and Tactics Teams, urban searchand rescue, bomb squads, HAZMAT, or other ancillary groups) as identified in plans / procedures).Appropriate direct-reading dosimetry must allow an individual(s) to read the administrative reportinglimits and maximum exposure limits contained in the ORO's plans / procedures.Direct-reading dosimeters must be zeroed or operationally checked prior to issuance. The dosimetersmust be inspected for. electrical leakage at least annually and replaced when necessary. Civil DefenseVictoreen Model 138s (CD V-138s) (0-200 mR), due to their documented history of electrical leakageproblems, must be inspected for electrical leakage at least quarterly and replaced when necessary. Thisleakage testing will be verified during the exercise, through documentation submitted in the ALC and/orthrough an SAV.Operational checks and testing of electronic dosimeters must be in accordance with the manufacturer'sinstructions and be verified during the exercise, through documentation submitted in the ALC and/orthrough an SAV.Monitoring Instruments: All instruments must be inspected, inventoried, and operationally checkedbefore each use. Instruments must be calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.Unmodified CDV-700 series instruments and other instruments without a manufacturer'srecommendation must be calibrated annually. Modified CDV-700 instruments must be calibrated inaccordance with the recommendation of the modification manufacturer. A label indicating suchcalibration must be on each instrument or calibrated frequency can be verified by other means. Inaddition, instruments being used to measure activity must have a sticker-affixed to their sides indicatingthe effective range of the readings. The range of readings documentation specifies the acceptable rangeof readings that the meter should indicate when it is response-checked using a standard test source.For FMTs, the instruments must be capable of measuring gamma exposure rates and detecting betaradiation. These instruments must be capable of measuring a range of activity and exposure, includingradiological protection/exposure control of team members and detection of activity on air samplecollection media, consistent with the intended use of the instrument and the ORO's plans / procedures.An appropriate radioactive check source must be used to verify proper operational response for each low-range radiation measurement instrument (less than tR/hr) and for high-range instruments when available.If a source is not available for a high-range instrument, a procedure must exist to operationally testthe instrument before entering an area where only a high-range instrument can make useful readings.In areas where portal monitors are used, the OROs must set up and operationally check the monitor(s).The monitor(s) must conform to the standards set forth in the Contamination Monitoring Standard for aPortal Monitor Used for Emergency Response, FEMA-REP-21 (March 1995) or in accordance with themanufacturer's recommendations.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in an actualemergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayParticipating facilities will demonstrate that eq2Wnent, maps, displays, dosimetry, KI and other'supplies are adequate and sufficient to support the emergency response.CU A DDnnCV Cý A -~fn- U AD 1A I A CVTCJTý flU M A VýAl 4 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationDocumentation of dosimetry inspection, dosimetry inventory and KI invent6ry will be availablefor review at the Region I office.Note: FEMA will provide copies of the Annual Letter of Certification to evaluators, as ;appropriate..... .. .......... .. ...... ... ... ..... .. .... .... ... :.. .L : .: ... ... ... ..." NOTE: "On the Spot" corrections approved for the fore mentioned sub-element. Thatportion of the evaluation element where players are initially unable to show properequipment, supplies or documentation. This portion of the criterion that deal withperformance only.Note: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates this sub-element unsatisfactorily, theFEMA Evaluator will inform the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or local organization, the FEMA Evaluator will provide the participantanother opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day.EVALUATIONAREA 2: Protective Action Decision-Makin'Sub-element 2.a -Emergehcy Worker Exposure Control ". .IntentThis Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROshave the capability to assess and control the radiation exposure received by emergencyworkers and have a decision chain in place, as specified in the ORO's plans/procedures, toauthorize emergency worker exposure limits to be exceededfor specific missions.Radiation exposure limits for emergency workers are the recommended accumulated doselimits or exposure rates that emergency workers may be permitted to incur during anemergency. These limits include any pre-established administrative reporting limits (that takeinto consideration TEDE or organ- specific limits) identified in the ORO 'splans/procedures.Criterion 2.a.1: OROs use a decision-making process, considering relevant factors andappropriate coordination, to ensure that an exposure control system, including the useof K1, is in place for emergency workers including provisions to authorize radiationexposure ii excess of administrative limits or protective action guides. ('NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, C.6; J.lO. e, fi K.3.a;k.4)Extent of PlayOROs authorized to send emergency workers into the plume exposure pathway EPZ shoulddemonstrate a capability to meet the criterion based on their emergency plans and procedures.Responsible OROs should demonstrate the cap26i4ity to make decisions concerning theauthorization of exposure levels in excess of pre-authorized levels and to the number ofemergency workers receiving radiation dose above pre-authorized levels.Q. A ..nnl CIA 1-1 U AD -I 1 1 nU .1 A --_ ._rAl1-UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationAs appropriate, OROs should demonstrate the capability to make decisions on the distribution andadministration of KI as a protective measure, based on the ORO's plan and/or procedures orprojected thyroid dose compared with the established Protective Action Guides (PAGs) for KIadministration.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans and procedures and completed, as they would bein an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise indicated in the extent of playagreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayProtective action decisions are demonstrated at the Massachusetts State EOC by MEMA andMDPH, with input from Incident Commander (if HAB event) based upon information providedfrom the EOF and until the adversaries are confinred to be neutralized from the IncidentCommand Post.Radiation Control Program EOF staff will analyze utility, field team and meteorological dataprovided at the EOF to make a recommendation to the State EOC for their consideration inmaking protective action decisions.Radiological briefings will: be provided to address exposure limits, procedures to replace thoepersonnel. approaching exposure limits and how permission to., exceed limits is Obtained.Em~~e~rgency workers will also be briefed on when to take KI. Distribution of KI to:emergenworkers will be simulated. MDPH will authorize use of KI when .radiological conditions warrant:Iuse.. If thescnrio hasno o paotntial. for a radiological release, the decision oni the distribution.and of KI as "a protective iimeaesuire for einiergency workers 9 .tled authorizationprocess. for emergency 'workers to exceed pre-authorized, levels can be addressed through an,interview ..... " .... ...Sub-element 2.b. -RadiologicalAssessmnent and Protective Action Recommnedations andDecisions for the Plume Phase of the EmergeniVc-: .IntentThis Sub-element is derivedfirom NUREG-0654/FEMA4-REP-1, which requires that OROs have thecapabilitY to independentlyproject integrated dose from projected or actual dose rates and comparethese estimates to the PAGs.OROs must have the capability to choose, among a range ofprotective actions, those most appropriatein a given emergency. OROs base these choices on PAGs fiom their plans/procedures or EPA 's Manualof Protective Action Guides and Protective Actions for Nuclear Incidents and other criteria, such asplant conditions, licensee PARs, coordination ofPADs with other politicaljurisdictions (e.g., otheraffected OROs and incident command), availability of in-place shelter, weather conditions, andsituations, to include HAB incidents, the threat posed by the specific hostile action, the affiliatedresponse, and the effect of an evacuation on the threat response effort, that create higher than normalrisk from general population evacuation.262Criterion 2.b.1: Appropriate protective action recommendations are based on availableinformation on plant conditions, field monitoring data, and licensee and ORO doseC- A flfllfl C-! A -AT U AD -I!l A --TIk- nO 11T A V AC'.___ I ý -CAI-A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station..::"'"/ .,. .2"9. .9' ."'" S"'. ."projections, as well as knowledge of onsite and offsite environmental conditions.(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, 1.10 and Supplement 3)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion must be accomplished concurrently with a licensee exerciseand may be demonstrated in a biennial or tabletop exercise.During the initial stage of the emergency response, following notification of plant conditions that maywarrant offsite protective actions, the ORO must demonstrate the capability to use appropriate means,described in the plans/procedures, to develop PARs for decision-makers based on available informationand recormnendations provided by the licensee as well as field monitoring data, if available. The OROmust also consider any release and meteorological data provided by the licensee.The ORO must demonstrate a reliable capability to independently validate dose projections. The types ofcalculations to be demonstrated depend on the data available and the need for assessments to support thePARs must be appropriate to the scenario. In all cases, calculation of projected dose must bedemonstrated. Projected doses must be related to quantities and units of the PAG to which they will becompared. PARs must be promptly transmitted to decision-makers in a pre-arranged format.When the licensee and ORO projected doses differ by more than a factor of 10, the ORO and licenseemust determine the source of the difference by discussing input data and assumptions, using differentmodels, or exploring possible reasons. Resolution of these differences must be incorporated into thePARs if timely and appropriate. The ORO must demonstrate the capability to use any additional data torefine projected doses and exposure rates and revise the associated PARs.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actualemergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayThis evaluation area will be demonstrated in accordance with the NIAT Handbook in the context ofthe exercise scenario.The State EOC decision making team will evaluate the protective action reconimendations of theNIAT accident assessment team and develop appropriate protective action decisions.Protective action decisions are demonstrated at the Massachusetts State EOC by MEMA andMDPH, in concert with the Incident Commander (if HAB event) based upon informationprovided from the EOF and until the adversaries are confirmed to be neutralized from the:Incident Command Post..Protective action recomniendations will b.emade in accordance with the MARERP and NIAT'.Handbook. MDPH will validate plant dose projections and coordinate resolution. .,:,:~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ .......... ....... .... .......... .......... ........ ........ ............ ....1Criterion 2.b.2: A decision-making process involving consideration of appropriatefactors and necessaiy coordination is used to make protective action decisions (PAD)for the general public (including the recommendation for the use of KI, if ORO policy).(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, A.3; Q&36; D.4; J.9; J.10.f, m)Extent of Play--*O fll T rn- -i 1A If A c ýrn C -l Al *.--- I 1 -1 .1-A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion must be accomplished concurrently with a licenseeexercise and may be demonstrated in a biennial or tabletop exercise.OROs must have the capability to make both initial and subsequent PADs. OROs must demonstrate thecapability to make initial PADs in a timely manner appropriate to the incident, based on informationfrom the licensee, assessment of plant status and potential or actual releases, other available informationrelated to the incident, input from appropriate ORO authorities (e.g., incident command), and PARsfrom the utility and ORO staff. In addition, a subsequent or alternate PAD may be appropriate if variousconditions (e.g., an HAB incident, weather, release timing and magnitude) pose undue risk to anevacuation, or if evacuation may disrupt the efforts to respond to a hostile action.OROs must demonstrate the ability to obtain supplemental resources (e.g., mutual aid) necessary toimplement a PAD if local law enforcement, fire service, HAZMAT, and emergency medical resourcesare used to augment response to the NPP site or other key infrastructure.Dose assessment personnel may provide additional PARs based on the subsequent dose projections,field monitoring data, or information on plant conditions. In addition, incident cormmand must provideinput regarding considerations for subsequent PARs based on the magnitude of the ongoing threat, theresponse, and/or site conditions. The decision-makers must demonstrate the capability to changeprotective actions based on the combination of all these factors.If the ORO has determined that KI will be used as a protective measure for the general public underoffsite plans/procedures, then it must demonstrate the capability to make decisions on the distributionand administration of KI to supplement sheltering and evacuation. This decision must be based on theORO's plans/procedures or projected thyroid dose compared with the established PAG for KIadministration. The KI decision-making process must involve close coordination with appropriateassessment and decision- making staff.If more than one ORO is involved in decision making, all appropriate OROs must communicate andcoordinate PADs with each other. In addition, decisions must be coordinated/communicated withincident commnand. OROs must demonstrate the capability to communicate the results of decisions to allthe affected locations.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayProtective action decisions are demonstrated at the Massachusetts State EOC. uipon,information provided by the EOF. MIEMA sand MDPH: Radiation Control Program staff willanalyze utility, field team and meteorological data provided at the EOF to nmake recommendation:to the State EOC'for~their6considerafion in making protective action decisions. H. -1HAB exercise.Incident Command wil be onulted as part of the decision. making processý :ttil the adversaries.are confirmed to be neutralized........ .. ...... .. .... ........... ...... ..... ....: ... :. ....... .. ..... .,C ....., ..:Sub-element 2.c -Protective Action Decisions Consideration for the Protection of Personswith Disabilities an Access/Functional Needs,.Intent 264This Sub-element is derived fiom NUREG-0654/FEMA -REP-], which requires that OROs have thecapability to determine PADs, including evacuation, sheltering, and use of KI, if applicable, for groupsVUA DDnnV C- -nXT U A ý ýnl A -U- nV -A M.--- 11 _rAlIn, UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationof persons with disabilities and access/functional needs (e.g., hospitals, nursing homes, correctionalfacilities, schools, licensed daycare centers, mobility-impaired individuals, and transportation-dependentindividuals). The focus is on those groups ofpersons with disabilities and access/fiuctional needs thatare, orpotentially will be, affected by a radiological release from an NPP.Criterion 2. c. 1: Protective action decisions are made, as appropriate, for groups ofpersonswith disabilities and access/functional needs. (NUREG-0654/FEMA -REP-1,D.4; £9;J.1O.d, e)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion must be accomplished concurrently with a licensee exerciseand may be demonstrated in a biennial or tabletop exercise that would include the use ofplantconditions transmitted from the licensee.Usually it is appropriate to implement evacuation in areas where doses are projected to exceed thelower end of the range of PAGs, except for incidents where there is a high-risk enviromnentalcondition or where high-risk groups (e.g., the inmmobile or infirm) are involved. In these cases, factorsthat must be considered include weather conditions, shelter availability, availability of transportationassets, risk of evacuation versus risk from the avoided dose, and precautionary school evacuations. Inaddition, decisions must be coordinated/communicated with the incident command. In situationswhere an institutionalized population cannot be evacuated, the ORO must consider use of KI.Applicable OROs must demonstrate the capability to alert and notify all public school systems/districtsof emergency conditions that are expected to or may necessitate protective actions for students.Demonstration requires that the OROs actually contact public school systems/districts during theexercise.In accordance with plans/procedures, OROs and/or officials of public school systems/districts mustdemonstrate the capability to make prompt decisions on protective actions for students. The decision-making process, including any preplanned strategies for protective actions for that ECL, must considerthe location of students at the time (e.g., whether the students are still at home, en route to school, or atschool).Since other agencies place requirements on hospitals to prepare for contaminated patients, the REPProgram has no need to evaluate these facilities, nor does the ORO have the responsibility to providetraining or dosimetry.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in anactual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayProtective action decisions, including those for individuals with disabilities and access/functional:needs population groups, are demonstrated at the Massachusetts State EOC based upon informationprovided b y MEMA and MDPH Radiation Control Program staff at the EOF. MIEMA and MDPHRadiation Control Program staff will analyze utility, field team and meteorological data provided atthe EOF to make a recommendation to the State EOC for their consideration in making protectiveaction decisions.In'a exercise Incident- Command will be2 &sulted 'as part of the decision making processthe adver.rsaries are confirmed to be neutralized.:.CCflCU l .r ri~ --X --. lI A. ~ ~ 1.1 .T n X..A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationSSub-element 2.d. -Radiological Assessmient Jad Decisiohi-M ,kinfg for the Ingestion Exposure:-IntentThis Sub-element is derived firom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-], which requires that OROs have themeans to assess the radiological consequences for the ingestion exposure pathway, relate them tothe appropriate PA Gs, and make timnelv, appropriate PADs to mitigate exposure fiom the pathway.During an incident at an NPP, a release of radioactive material may contaminate water supplies andagricultural products in the surrounding areas. An' such contamination would likely occur duringthe plume phase of the incident and, depending on the nature of the release, could impact theingestion pathway for weeks or Years.Criterion 2. d. 1: Radiological consequences for the ingestion pathway are assessedand appropriate protective action decisions are made based on the ORO's planningcriteria. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, A.3; C.1, 4; D.4; J9, 11)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion must be accomplished concurrently with a licensee exerciseand may be demonstrated in a biennial or tabletop exercise that would include the use of plant conditionstransmitted from the licensee.OROs are expected to take precautionary actions to protect food and water supplies, or to minimizeexposure to potentially contaminated water and food, in accordance with their respectiveplans/procedures. Often OROs initiate such actions based on criteria related to the facility's ECLs. Suchactions may include recommendations to place milk animals on stored feed and use protected watersupplies.The ORO must use its procedures to assess the radiological consequences of a release on the food andwater supplies, such as the development of a sampling plan. The ORO's assessment must includeevaluation of the radiological analyses of representative samples of water, food, and other ingestiblesubstances of local interest from potentially impacted areas; characterization of the releases from thefacility; and the extent of areas potentially impacted by the release. During this assessment, OROs mustconsider use of agricultural and watershed data within the 50-mile EPZ. The radiological impacts on thefood and water must then be compared to the appropriate ingestion PAGs contained in the ORO'splans/procedures. The plans/procedures contain PAGs based on specific dose commitment criteria or oncriteria as recommended by current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance. Timely andappropriate recommendations must be provided to the ORO decision-makers group for implementationdecisions. OROs may also include a comparison of taking or not taking a given action on the resultantingestion pathway dose coimmitments.The ORO must demonstrate timely decisions to minimize radiological impacts from the ingestionpathway, based on the given assessments and other information. Any such decisions must becommunicated and, to the extent practical, coordinated with neighboring OROs. These decisions includetracking agricultural products entering and leaving the EPZ. Demonstration of plans and procedureswhich use traffic access control points to track agricultural products entering and leaving the EPZ may beconducted through interview.266OROs will use Federal resources, as identified in the Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex of the NRF andother resources (e.g., compacts or nuclear insurers), as necessary. Evaluation of this criterion will take intoconsideration the level of Federal and other participating resources.C. ý ..nný C I A 11n11 .ý .'A I ý ýý .1 A -I ý -1 A I1.1 A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationAll activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and cotrpleted as they would be in an actualemergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayThis sub-element will not be evaluated during this exercise.Sub-element 2 e. -Radiological Assessment and Decision-Making Concerning Relocation,Re-entry, and ReturnIntentThis Sub-element is derivedfrom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROshave the capability to make decisions on post-plume phase relocation, reently, and return ofthe general public. These decisions are essentialfor protection of the public fiom direct long-term exposure to deposited radioactive materials fiom a severe incident at an NPP.Criterion 2.e.1: Timely relocation, re-entry, and return decisions are Blade andcoordinated as appropriate, based on assessments of the radiological conditions andcriteria in the ORO's plan and/or procedures. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, LIO;J.9; K.3.a; M.)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion must be accomplished concurrently with a licenseeexercise and may be demonstrated in a full-scale, functional or tabletop exercise that wouldinclude the use of plant conditions transmitted from the licensee.Relocation: OROs must demonstrate the capability to estimate integrated dose in contaminatedareas and compare these estimates with PAGs; apply decision criteria for relocation of thoseindividuals in the general public who have not been evacuated, but where actual or projecteddoses are in excess of relocation PAGs; and control access to evacuated and restricted areas.OROs will make decisions for relocating members of the evacuated public who lived in areasthat now have residual radiation levels in excess of the PAGs. Determination of areas to berestricted must be based on factors such as the mix of radionuclides in deposited materials,calculated exposure rates versus the PAGs, and analyses of vegetation and soil field samples.Reentry: Decisions must be made on location of control points and policies regarding accessand exposure control for emergency workers and members of the general public who need totemporarily enter the evacuated area to perform specific tasks or missions.Examples of control procedures are the assignment of, or checking for, direct-reading andpermanent record dosimetry for emergency workers; questions regarding an individual'sobjectives, locations expected to be visited, and associated timeframes; availability of maps andplots of radiation exposure rates; and advice o,&eas to avoid. Control procedures also includemonitoring of individuals, vehicles, and equipment; the implementation of decision criteriaregarding decontamination; and proper disposition of emergency worker dosimetry andmaintenance of emergency worker radiation exposure records.CC A DflflfV Qr A --lX UA AD jOT A UVTCXT.ý flC DI A V.--- I ý _rAI1. 1 A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationResponsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to develop a strategy for authorized reentryof individuals into the restricted zone(s), based on established decision criteria. OROs mustdemonstrate the capability to modify those policies for security purposes (e.g., police patrols),maintenance of essential services (e.g., fire protection and utilities), and other critical functions.They must demonstrate the capability to use decision-making criteria in allowing access to therestricted zone by the public for various reasons, such as to maintain property (e.g., to care forfarm animals or secure machinery for storage) or retrieve important possessions. Coordinatedpolicies for access and exposure control must be developed among all agencies with roles toperform in the restricted zone(s). OROs must demonstrate the capability to establish policies forprovision of dosimetry to all individuals allowed to reenter the restricted zone(s). The extent towhich OROs need to develop policies on reentry will be determined by scenario events.Return: OROs must demonstrate the capability to implement policies concerning return ofmembers of the public to areas that were evacuated during the plume phase (i.e., permittingpopulations that were previously evacuated to reoccupy their homes and businesses on anunrestricted basis). OROs must base decisions on environmental data and political boundaries orphysical/ geological features, which allow identification of the boundaries of areas to whichmembers of the general public may return. Return is permitted to the boundary of the restrictedarea(s) that is based on the relocation PAG.Other factors that the ORO must consider in decision-making include conditions that permitcancellation of the ECL and relaxation of associated restrictive measures. OROs must basereturn recommendations on measurements of radiation from ground deposition. OROs musthave the capability to identify services and facilities that require restoration within a few daysand to identify the procedures and resources for their restoration. Examples of these services andfacilities are medical and social services, utilities, roads, schools, and internmediate-term housingfor relocated persons.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayThis sub-element will not be evaluated during this exercise.EVALUATION AREA 3: Protective Action ImplementationSub-element 3.a-Implementation of Emergencvl Woitrker Exposure ControlIntentThis Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA4-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to provide for the following: distribuition, use, collection, and processing ofdirect-reading dosimetry and permanent record dosimetny; reading of direct-reading dosimetryby emergency workers at appropriate fiequencies;, maintaining a radiation dose record for eachemergency worker, establishing a decision 6Bn or authorization procedure for emergencyworkers to incur radiation exposures in excess of the PA Gs, and the capability to provide Kiforemergency workers, always applying the as low as is reasonably achievable principle asappropriate.QUA DDflfV -T A -n-lX U AD 1A I A U-'CkTT flU DI AM V _V Al 1A1 A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCriterion 3.a.1: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry and procedures, and manageradiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans andprocedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read theirdosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart.(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, J.1O.e; K.3.a, b; K.4)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a full-scale, functionalor tabletop exercise. Other means may include drills, seminars or training activities that wouldfidly demonstrate technical proficiencv.OROs must demonstrate the capability to provide emergency workers (including supplementalresources) with the appropriate direct-reading and permanent record dosimetry, dosimeterchargers, KI, and instructions on the use of these items. For evaluation purposes, appropriatedirect-reading dosimetry is defined as dosimetry that allows an individual(s) to read theadministrative reporting limits that are pre-established at a level low enough to considersubsequent calculation of TEDE and maximum exposure limits, for those emergency workersinvolved in lifesaving activities, contained in the ORO's plans / procedures.Each emergency worker must have basic knowledge of radiation exposure limits as specified inthe ORO's plans / procedures. If supplemental resources are used, they must be provided withjust-in-time training to ensure basic knowledge of radiation exposure control. Emergencyworkers must demonstrate procedures to monitor and record dosimeter readings and manageradiological exposure control.During a plume phase exercise, emergency workers must demonstrate the procedures to befollowed when administrative exposure limits and turn-back values are reached. The emergencyworker must report accumulated exposures during the exercise as indicated in theplans / procedures. OROs must demonstrate the actions described in the plans / procedures bydetermining whether to replace the worker, authorize the worker to incur additional exposures, ortake other actions. If exercise play does not require emergency workers to seek authorizationsfor additional exposure, evaluators must interview at least two workers to determine theirknowledge of whom to contact in case authorization is needed, and at what exposure levels.Workers may use any available resources (e.g., written procedures and/or coworkers) inproviding responses.Although it is desirable for all emergency workers to each have a direct-reading dosimeter, theremay be situations where team members will be in close proximity to each other during the entiremission. In such cases, adequate control of exposure can be achieved for all team membersusing one direct-reading dosimeter worn by the team leader. Emergency workers assigned tolow-exposure rate fixed facilities (e.g., EOCs and communications center within the EPZ,reception centers, and counting laboratories) may have individual direct-reading dosimeters orthey may be monitored using group dosimetry (i.e., direct-reading dosimeters strategically placedin the work area). Each team member must still have his or her own permanent recorddosimetry. Individuals authorized by the OR96V reenter an evacuated area during the plume(emergency) phase, must be limited to the l'owest radiological exposure commensurate withcompleting their missions.CC A -ýný Qý A -- ý A ý -I A C-C- -nT A ý UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationOROs may have administrative limits lower than EPA-400-R-92-001 dose limits for emergencyworkers performing various services (e.g., life-saving, protection of valuable property, allactivities). OROs must ensure that the process used to seek authorization for exceeding doselimits does not negatively impact the capability to respond to an incident where life-savingand/or protection of valuable property may require an urgent response.OROs must demonstrate the capability to accomplish distribution of KI to emergency workersconsistent with decisions made. OROs must have the capability to develop and maintain lists ofemergency workers who have ingested KI, including documentation of the date(s) and time(s)they did so. Ingestion of KI recommended by the designated ORO health official is voluntary.For evaluation purposes, the actual ingestion of KI shall not be performed. OROs mustdemonstrate the capability to formulate and disseminate instructions on using KI for thoseadvised to take it. Emergency workers must demonstrate basic knowledge of procedures forusing KI whether or not the scenario drives the implementation of KI use. This can beaccomplished by an interview with the evaluator.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayEPZ/RC EOCs: Dosimetry packets will be issued to a minimum of two individuals who will beworking inside each EPZ EOC. Actual distribution and ingestion of KI will not occur.Knowledge of, the use of dosimetry and Massachusetts policies on dosimetry will bedemonstrateditlirough an interview with the. FEMA Evaluator and only with individuals dosimet*..._ _NOTE: "On the Spot" corrections approved for the fore mentioned sub-element. Thatportion of the evaluation element dealing with issuing of doshnetry and briefihms. Alsoto be included is the demonstration by emnereency worker knowledge of radiationcontrol.Note: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates this sub-element unsatisfactorily, theFEMA Evaluator will inform the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or local organization, the FEMA Evaluator will provide the participantanother opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day.Sub-element 3.b -Implementation ofKI Decision'IntentThis Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to provide Kl for institutionalized individuals, and, if in the plans /procedures, tothe general public for whom immediate evacuation may not be feasible, very difficult, orsignificantly delayed. While it is necessary fA27(OROs to have the capability to provide K! toinstitutionalized individuals, providing K1 to the general public is an ORO option and must bereflected as such in ORO plans / procedures. Provisions must include the availability ofadequate quantities, storage, and means of distributing KI.CCA DffV C A TI N~I A. 1f1A I ~ cr fl flY. A V -- IC o~ _c 'A A n UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCriterion 3. b. 1: KI and appropriate instructions are available should a decision torecommend use of Kl be made. Appropriate record keeping of the administrationof Kl for emergency workers and institutionalized individuals is maintained.(NUREG-O654/FEMA-REP-1, J. 1O.ej)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a fidl-scale, functionalor tabletop exercise. Other means may include drills, seminars or training activities that wouldfidly demonstrate technical proficiency.OROs must demonstrate the capability to make KI available to institutionalized individuals, and,where provided for in their plans / procedures, to members of the general public. OROs mustdemonstrate the capability to accomplish distribution of KI consistent with decisions made.OROs must have the capability to develop and maintain lists of institutionalized individuals whohave ingested KI, including documentation of the date(s) and time(s) they were instructed toingest KI. Ingestion of KI recommended by the designated ORO health official is voluntary. Forevaluation purposes, the actual ingestion of KI shall not be performed. OROs must demonstratethe capability to formulate and disseminate instructions on using KI for those advised to take it.If a recommendation is made for the general public to take KI, appropriate information must beprovided to the public by the means of notification specified in the ORO's plans / procedures.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of Play.... , " .. .... ... ............. i -r : ' : .. ....* , " ..... .. .... ............ ... .'Actual distribution and ingestion of KI will not occur. Empty KI tablet containers (Small zip-,lock baigs) will be included in the dosimetry packets for emergency workers.NOTE: "On the Spot" corrections approved for the fore mentioned sub-element.Note: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates this sub-element unsatisfactorily, theFEMA Evaluator will inform the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or local organization, the FEMA Evaluator will provide the participantanother opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day.Sub2-element 3.c -Implementation of Actions for Persons with Disabilities andAccess/Functional NeedsIntentThis Sub-element is derived fiom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to implement PADs, including o7iFcuation and/or sheltering, for all persons withdisabilities and access /fiunctional needs. The focus is on those persons with disabilities andaccess/functional needs that are (or potentially will be) affected by a radiological release ftomnan NPP.V. ý -11n- A. In I I ný -A -.--- I n -1 ý I UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station..... .....,Criterion 3.c.1: Protective action decisions are implemented for persons withdisabilities and access/functional needs other than schools within areas subject toprotective actions. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, J.10.c, d, e, g)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a fidl-scale orfunctional exercise, an actual event, or by means of drills conducted at any time.Applicable OROs must demonstrate the capability to alert and notify (i.e., provide PARs andemergency information and instructions to) persons with disabilities and access/functional needs,including hospitals / medical facilities, nursing homes, correctional facilities, andmobility-impaired and transportation-dependent individuals. OROs must demonstrate thecapability to provide for persons with disabilities and access / functional needs in accordancewith plans / procedures.Contact with persons with disabilities and access / functional needs and reception facilities maybe actual or simulated, as agreed to in the extent of play. Some contacts with transportationproviders must be actual, as negotiated in the extent of play. All actual and simulated contactsmust be logged.Since the other agencies place requirements on hospitals to prepare for contaminated patients, theREP Program has no need to evaluate these facilities, nor does the ORO have the responsibilityto provide training or dosimetry.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayAll actual and simulated contacts must be logged.Region I: Initial callsto Transportation Providers will be made to verify telephone number and contactperson. Defa'ult numbers from the Resource Manual will be Used to detennine transportation:'requirements. No vehicles or personnel will be mobilized: A list of the Transportation Providers fromthe ResourceCManual will be provided to the FEMA Evaluator.Region I Special Needs Coordinator and staff will demonstrate5all appropriate communicatons with EPZcommunity EOC staff and~coordination of bed space assigninent for evacuating nursing hometý patients,and hospital patients, although actual evacuation of special facihtltes will not occur. Default numbers:,from the Resource Manual will be used. ..EPZ EOCs: All special facilities willlreceive initial contact only to verify attendance (to be logged forcomparisonmto default number). Defaqultnumbers will be used from the Resource Manual for exerciseplay. Follow-up calts will be simulated and logged. Participating special:facilities will be interviewedlout of sequence by a FEMA Evalator. .Local Transportation Coordinators will report to R?gnI I thi number of additional beds needed .toaccommodate patients frofrn each participating facility that may be directed to evacuate; however, nopatients will actually be moved or be:lmpacted in any way. Default numbers from the: Resource Manual.will be used to determine number of bedýs needed.C. A Dff VCIA Iflnd L A. 1.1 .C -, f11- -iC -r*' l..~ A) 1.l A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station>Thelist ofaccess and functional needs dtsIII1e sIiown tothe FEMA evaluator; however, information is confidenta:l and copies will not be prjo)idd tothe evaluator. All calls will be simulatedA.and l6gged. There areiio access and functional iv ls requiring the use of TTY in theEPZ. therefore TTY wiI ot. be demonstrated.Criterion 3.c.2: OROs/School officials implement protective actions for schools.(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, J.10.c, d, e, g)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a full-scale, finctional,or tabletop exercise, an actual event, or by means of drills conducted at any thne.Public school systems / districts must demonstrate the ability to implement PADs for students.The demonstration must be made as follows: each school system / district within the 10 mileEPZ must demonstrate implementation of protective actions. At least one school per affectedsystem / district must participate in the demonstration. Canceling the school day, dismissingearly, or sheltering in place must be simulated by describing to evaluators the procedures thatwould be followed. If evacuation is the implemented protective action, all activities tocoordinate and complete the evacuation of students to reception centers, congregate care centers,or host schools may actually be demonstrated or accomplished through an interview process.If accomplished through an interview, appropriate school personnel including decision-makingofficials (e.g., schools' superintendent/principals and transportation director/bus dispatchers),and at least one bus driver (and the bus driver's escort, if applicable) must be available todemonstrate knowledge of their role(s) in the evacuation of school children. Communicationscapabilities between school officials and the buses, if required by the plans / procedures, must beverified.Officials of the school system(s) must demonstrate the capability to develop and provide timelyinformation to OROs for use in messages to parents, the general public, and the media on thestatus of protective actions for schools.If a school facility has emergency plans as a condition of licensing, those plans may be submittedto FEMA review in place of demonstration or interview pursuant to the ORO's plans/proceduresas negotiated in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Since the other agencies place requirements on hospitals to prepare for contaminated patients, theREP Program has no need to evaluate these facilities, nor does the ORO have the responsibilityto provide training or dosimetry.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of Play'Regi!" IEOC. The MEIA Region.%l S cial 'o N ordinator, in an interview 1. with the FEMAEvaluator;:will- provide a ist of sc hools located the EPZ with students who::reside within the EPZ.(C.all0to schools outside the EPZ will be simulated and logged.. .Cý A -nný Cý A -n- ý A ý 1A I A VVýCXIý nV DT A ý-CAIýAl A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationrEP.ZEOCs: Initial notificatio \will be made to ill school superintendents who will conta'ct each* school;.and day care per procedure to obtain attendance (informationk 6 togged for comparison.jto1d>1 f0ultl .numbers). Default numbers for the Resour&\MaLiiua1 will b.eusedfor exercise playFo. llow-up.calls wllatnd logged:SchoolSuperintendents: : ." ""Amesbury School Superintenh:: ...Newburyport School Supierintendent:entucket School SuperintendentTriton School SSuperintendent ..Sub-element 3.d. -Implementation of Trafficand Access ControIntentThis Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA -REP-], which requires that OROs havethe capability to implement protective action plans / procedures, including relocation andrestriction of access to evacuated/sheltered areas. This Sub-element focuses on selecting,establishing, and stqffing of traffic and access control points, and removal of impediments to theflow of evacuation traffic.Criterion 3.d.1: Appropriate traffic and access control is established. Accurateinstructions are provided to traffic and access control personnel.(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, A.3; C.1, 4; J.10.g, j)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a full-scale orfinctional exercise, an actual event, or bjy' means of drills conducted at any time.OROs must demonstrate the capability to select, establish, and staff appropriate traffic andaccess control points consistent with current conditions and PADs (e.g., evacuating, sheltering,and relocation) in a timely manner. OROs must demonstrate the capability to provideinstructions to traffic and access control staff on actions to take when modifications in protectiveaction strategies necessitate changes in evacuation patterns or in the area(s) where access iscontrolled.Traffic and access control staff must demonstrate accurate knowledge of their roles andresponsibilities, including verifying emergency worker identification and access authorization tothe affected areas, as per the Extent-of-Play Agreement. These capabilities may be demonstratedby actual deployment or by interview, in accordance with the Extent-of-Play Agreement.In instances where OROs lack authority necessary to control access by certain types of traffic(e.g., rail, water, and air traffic), they must demonstrate the capability to contact the state orFederal agencies that have the needed authority, as agreed upon in the Extent-of-PlayAgreement. 274All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.C- -DflflflV r A r~i -,.L1AD I 2A1 CVTUAlr -VU n' A -J fl--- 11 .. l 4- jA UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationMassachusetts Extent of Play.EPZ EOCs and/or ICP: EPZ EOCs will demonstrate the ability to direct and monitor traffic.control operations within their jurisdictions through discussions and communications with theievaluator. At the EOCs, local highway representative and the Loc al Police representative will.participate in a discussion.'6f procedures andiesources available for traffic control. No personnelor equipment will be deployed to field.locations............. ..... ,..' ......... ...... ............ ..........NOTE: "On the Spot" corrections approved for the fore mentioned sub-element. Appropriatetraffic and access control established. Accurate instructions are provided to traffic andaccess control point personnelNote: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates this sub-element unsatisfactorily, theFEMA Evaluator will inform the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or local organization, the FEMA Evaluator will provide the participantanother opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day.Criterion 3.d.2: Impediments to evacuation are identified and resolved.(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, J.10.k)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a full-scale orfunctional exercise, an actual event, or by means of drills conducted at any time.OROs must demonstrate the capability, as required by the scenario, to identify and takeappropriate actions concerning impediments to evacuation. Actual dispatch of resources to dealwith impediments, such as wreckers, need not be demonstrated; however, all contacts, actual orsimulated, must be logged. The impediment must remain in place during the evacuation, does notnecessarily need to occur on an evacuation route, and should be such that re-routing of traffic isrequired. The impediment should result in, and must remain in place long enough, fordemonstration of the decision-making and coordination with the JIC to communicate thealternate route to evacuees leaving the area.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayEach EPZ Local EOC will demonstrate decision-making regarding rerouting of traffic following[a traffic impediment by a controller inject or through an interview with the FEMA Evaluator.No personnel or equipment will be dispatched to the simulated accident scene.If the scenario does not lead to evacuation the y, sria shall be deemed complete if the ORO candescribe to the evaluator the actions they would take to overcome a major traffic impedimentduring an evacuation and how such actions would be communicated to the public and affectedOROs. .A. 1.1 ý -.1 A -.--- 11 _1A1'Al A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationINOTE: "On the Spot" corrections approved for the fore mentioned sub-element. Impedimentsto evacuation are identifted and resolved.Note: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates this sub-element unsatisfactorily, theFEMA Evaluator will inform the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or local organization, the FEMA Evaluator will provide the participantanother opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day.Siub-elemnenht3. e- IImplementation of Ingestion PathwaV DecisionsIntentThis Sub-element is derived fiom NUREG-0654/FEMA -REP-IL which requires that OROs havethe capability to implement protective actions, based on criteria recommended by current FDAguidance, for the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ (i.e., the area within an approximate 50-mileradius of the NPP). This Sub-element focuses on those actions required for implementation ofprotective actions.Criterion 3.e.l: The ORO demonstrates the availability and appropriate use ofadequate information regarding water, food supplies, milk, and agriculturalproduction within the ingestion exposure pathway emergency planning zone forimplementation of protective actions. NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, A.3; C.1, 4;J.11)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a full-scale orfinctional exercise, an actual event, or by means of drills conducted at any time.Applicable OROs must demonstrate the capability to secure and use current information on thelocations of dairy farms, meat and poultry producers, fisheries, fruit growers, vegetable growers,grain producers, food processing plants, and water supply intake points to implement protectiveactions within the EPZ. OROs use Federal resources as identified in the NRFNuclear / Radiological Incident Aimex, and other resources (e.g., compacts, nuclear insurers), ifavailable. Evaluation of this criterion will take into consideration the level of Federal and otherresources participating in the exercise.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of Play.T h is su b -e le m e n t ' : ~~~~.... .... .... .... .. .. ........... ...... .".... ...... ............. ...This sub-element will not be evaluated during this exercise. ... ................... ...276Criterion 3.e.2: Appropriate measures, strategies, and pre-printed instructionalmaterial are developed for implementing protective action decisions for contaminatedCUA --llll -T A I.-~h U A .1.1 1 rSrrlr .lCf All_rAlI-A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationwater, food products, milk, and agricultural production. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1,G.1,J.9,11)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a full-scale orfinctional exercise, an actual event, or by means of drills conducted at any time.OROs must demonstrate the development of measures and strategies for implementation ofingestion exposure pathway EPZ protective actions by formulating protective action informationfor the general public and food producers and processors. Demonstration of this criterionincludes either pre-distributed public information material in the ingestion exposure pathwayEPZ or the capability for rapid reproduction and distribution of appropriate reproduction-readyinformation and instructions to pre-determined individuals and businesses.OROs must also demonstrate the capability to control, restrict, or prevent distribution ofcontaminated food by commercial sectors. Exercise play must include demonstration ofcommunications and coordination among organizations to implement protective actions. Fieldplay of implementation activities may be simulated. For example, communications andcoordination with agencies responsible for enforcing food controls within the ingestion exposurepathway EPZ must be demonstrated, but actual communications with food producers andprocessors may be simulated.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayThis sub-element will not be evaluated during this exercise. ..Sub-element 3.f- Inplementation of Relocation, Re-entry, and Return DecisionsIntentThis Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEM4 -REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to implement plans, procedures, and decisions for post-plune phase relocation,reentry, and return. Implementation of these decisions is essential for protecting the public firomdirect long-term exposure to deposited radioactive materials from a severe incident at acommercial NPP.Criterion 3.fl1: Decisions regarding controlled reentry, relocation, and return ofindividuals during the post-plume phase are coordinated with appropriateorganizations and implemented. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, E. 7; J.10.j; J.12;K.S.b; M.1, 3)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion mi'7Je accomplished during a fill-scale, functional,or tabletop exercise, an actual event, or by means of drills conducted at an)' time.C. A ..nný CIA 11n1l .A .1A I I -T A -.--- 14 -1 ý I'A' A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationRelocation: OROs must demonstrate the capability to coordinate and implement decisionsconcerning relocation of individuals located in radiologically contaminated areas who were notpreviously evacuated. Such individuals must be relocated to an area(s) where radiologicalcontamination will not expose the general public to doses that exceed the relocation PAGs.OROs must also demonstrate the capability to provide for short- or long-term relocation ofevacuees who lived in an area(s) that has residual radiation levels above the (first-, second-, and50-year) PAGs.Areas of consideration must include the capability of OROs to communicate with other OROsregarding timing of actions, notification of the population of procedures for relocation, andnotification of, and advice for, evacuated individuals who will be converted to relocation statusin situations where they will not be able to return to their homes due to high levels ofcontamination. OROs must also demonstrate the capability to communicate instructions to thepublic regarding relocation decisions and intermediate-term housing for relocated persons.Reentry: OROs must demonstrate the capability to control reentry and exit of individuals whoare authorized by the ORO to temporarily reenter the restricted area during the post-plume(i.e., intermediate or late) phase to protect them from unnecessary radiation exposure. OROsmust also demonstrate the capability to control exit of vehicles and other equipment to controlthe spread of contamination outside the restricted area(s). Individuals without specificradiological response missions, such as farmers for animal care, essential utility servicepersonnel, or other members of the public who must reenter an evacuated area during thepost-emergency phase must be limited to the lowest radiological exposure commensurate withcompleting their missions. Monitoring and decontamination facilities will be established asappropriate.Examples of control procedures are: (1) assignment of, or checking for, direct-reading andpermanent record dosimetry for emergency workers; (2) questions regarding the individuals'objective(s), location(s) expected to be visited, and associated timeframes; (3) maps and plots ofradiation exposure rates; (4) advice on areas to avoid; (5) procedures for exit, includingmonitoring of individuals, vehicles, and equipment; (6) decision criteria regardingcontamination; (7) proper disposition of emergency worker dosimetry, and (8) maintenance ofemergency worker radiation exposure records.Return: OROs must demonstrate the capability to implement policies concerning return ofmembers of the public to areas that were evacuated during the plume phase. OROs mustdemonstrate the capability to identify and prioritize services and facilities that require restorationwithin a few days, and to identify procedures and resources for their restoration. Examples ofthese services and facilities are medical and social services, utilities, roads, and schools.Communication among OROs for relocation, reentry, and return may be simulated. Allsimulated or actual contacts must be documented. These discussions may be accomplished in agroup setting.OROs must use Federal resources as identified in the NRF Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex,and other resources (e.g., compacts or nuclear insurers), if available. Evaluation of this criterionwill take into consideration the level of Federa and other resources participating in the exercise.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.CC A flfflfV Cm

• TI ýM U AD -flI A ---~T flU DT A 'V-- 11 -1 A I UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationMassachusetts Extent of PlayTýis suhJýbement will not be evaluated dUlji this -xe""ise'EVALUATION AREA 4: Field Measurement And AnalysisSab-elinenU.a.- Plume Phase FiektA11easurements andg lnalyses...IntentThis Sub-element is derived fiom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to deploy FMTs with the equipment, methods, and expertise necessary todetermine the location of airborne radiation and particulate deposition on the ground.from anairborne plume. In addition, NUREG-0654/FEMA -REP-I indicates that OROs must have thecapability to use FMTs within the plume exposure pathway EPZ to detect airborne radioiodinein the presence of noble gases and radioactive particulate material in the airborne plume. In anincident at an NPP, the possible release of radioactive material may pose a risk to the nearbypopulation and envirolnent. Although incident assessment methods are available to project theextent and magnitude of a release, these methods are subject to large uncertainties. During anincident, it is important to collect field radiological data to help characterize any radiologicalrelease. Adequate equipment and procedures are essential to such field measurement efforts.Criterion 4.a.l: [RESERVED]Criterion 4.a.2: Field teams (2 or more) are managed to obtain sufficientinformation to help characterize the release and to control radiation exposure.(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, C.1; H.12; 1.7, 8, 11; J.10.a)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a fidl-scale, functional,or tabletop exercise. Other means may include drills, seminars or training activities that wouldfully demonstrate technical proficiency.Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to brief FMTs on predicted plume locationand direction, plume travel speed, and exposure control procedures before deployment. Duringan HAB incident, the Field Team management must keep the incident command informed offield monitoring teams' activities and location. Coordination with FMTs and field monitoringmay be demonstrated as out-of-sequence demonstrations, as negotiated in the Extent-of-PlayAgreement.Field measurements are needed to help characterize the release and support the adequacy ofimplemented protective actions, or to be a factor in modifying protective actions. Teams must bedirected to take measurements at such locations and times as necessary to provide sufficientinformation to characterize the plume and its inmacts.279If the responsibility for obtaining peak measurements in the plume has been accepted by licenseefield monitoring teams, with concurrence from OROs, there is no requirement for theseCC A DDnnV Cý A "nM ý AD IA1 A ýý DT A ý-__ 11 -CAIInI A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvenent Plan Seabrook Stationý'44measurements to be repeated by ORO monitoring teams. If the licensee FMTs do not obtainpeak measurements in the plume, it is the ORO's decision as to whether peak measurements arenecessary to sufficiently characterize the plume. The sharing and coordination of plumemeasurement information among all FMTs (licensee, Federal, and ORO) is essential.OROs must use Federal resources as identified in the NRF Nuclear/Radiological Incident Anmexand other resources (e.g., compacts or the licensee). Evaluation of this criterion will take intoconsideration the level of Federal and other resources participating in the exercise.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayThis criterion v/as demonstrated during the Pilgrin .2014 the team will deploy fortraining pirposes only. ..NIAT FieLd Teams are managed44bTy thi": IcTea'm Coordinator who is located .at. the:utilityOF. Hle will brief and dispamch sampling location.s 1inaccordance Nwith the NIAT'Section T).4 dictated by scenarioPlay The Field 'Teamcst i\l collect one completesam p le .* ........ .......... .... ....~. ......... ..... ... .... :.NIAT Field.Teamnpersonnel will prepare sample mnedia, uey fonrs, and chain of c6ustoly,documentsiasif they were being transferred to thelab hor anaiysis. Actual transporL6f. ampleswilblbe simulated. Fbr scen'arifs involving. Hostile A\ctioin se inkýidnts the Field Te" '"oordinator ci:cqdinia.e atctivities with the Command Post and .or operate beyonid.,an establishecFI'Security Perimeter. <4 4Controller injects will be specifically prepared to.. allm\ " >Ie" Teaný to e.. evaluated but the'seinject, .will not-be part of the HAB scenario afid .theirce1or ill be separate: fromnthe I AB:scenano. .. .Criterion 4.a.3: Ambient radiation measurements are made and recorded atappropriate locations, and radioiodine and particulate samples are collected. Teamswill move to an appropriate low background location to determine whether anysignificant (as specified in the plan and/or procedures) amount of radioactivity hasbeen collected on the sampling media. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, C.1; H.12: 1.8,9; J.10.a)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a full-scale, finctional,or tabletop exercise. Other means may include drills, seminars or training activities that wouldfidly demonstrate technical proficiency.280Two or more FMTs must demonstrate the capability to make and report measurements ofambient radiation to the field team coordinator, dose assessment team, or other appropriateauthority. FMTs must also demonstrate the capability to obtain an air sample for measurementQU A ODC\CV CT A --fl TT AA l -flI A U --C~'1 -l -l A 'J1A1 A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationof airborne radioiodine and particulates, and to provide the appropriate authority with field datapertaining to measurement. If samples have radioactivity significantly above background, theauthority must consider the need for expedited laboratory analyses of these samples.Coordination concerning transfer of samples, including a chain-of-custody form(s), to aradiological laboratory(ies) must be demonstrated.OROs must share data in a timely manner with all other appropriate OROs. All methodology,including contamination control, instrumentation, preparation of samples, and a chain-of-custodyform(s) for transfer to a laboratory(ies), will be in accordance with the ORO's plans / procedures.OROs must use Federal resources as identified in the NRF Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annexand other resources (e.g., compacts or the licensee). Evaluation of this criterion will take intoconsideration the level of Federal and other resources participating in the exercise.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of Play.This criterion was demonstrated during the Pilgrim 2014 the team will deploy fortraining purposes only...Two MA NIAT Field Teams willbe dispatched from theEOF in. accordance iththeNMAT"Handbook. Once, dispatched, only disposable gloves will be used for actual exeicise play:Charcoal cartridges will be usedinstead of silver zeolite.TheN!AT FieldTeams x llcollect one 'complete sminple (moitoring and air sample) as> :specified by the proceduresin .Section D.4of the.NAT Handbook. .For scenarios involving Hostile .Action based'iiicidents the FielId Team Controlwill coordinate,'activities with the Incident Cofmmand Post 'aAd/ or operate beyond an established Security,NOTE: "On the Spot" corrections approved for the fore mentioned sub-element. Thatportion of the evaluation element that demonstrates one complete sample.Note: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates this sub-element unsatisfactorily, theFEMA Evaluator will inform the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or local organization, the FEMA Evaluator will provide the participantanother opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day.Sub-element 4.b -Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Saný ling .Intent 281This Sub-element is derived firom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to assess the actual or potential magnitude and locations of radiological hazards-A DD -fl -T A --*X TI A D ýA I A l~lI --- -fDT A '. f.--- .I ~ _A1 1.l '1 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationto determine the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ and to support relocation, reenty, and returndecisions. This Sub-element focuses on collecting environmental samples for laboratotyanalyses that are essential for decisions on protecting the public from contaminated food andwater and direct radiation firom deposited materials.Criterion 4.b.l: The field teams (2 or more) demonstrate the capability to makeappropriate measurements and to collect appropriate samples (e.g., food crops,milk, water, vegetation, and soil) to support adequate assessments and protectiveaction decision making. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, C.1; 1.8; J.11)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a fill-scale, finctional,or tabletop exercise. Other means may include drills, seminars or training activities that wouldfidly demonstrate technical proficiency.The ORO's FMTs must demonstrate the capability to take measurements and samples, at suchtimes and locations as directed, to enable an adequate assessment of the ingestion pathway and tosupport reentry, relocation, and return decisions. When resources are available, use of aerialsurveys and in-situ gamma measurement is appropriate. All methodology, includingcontamination control, instrumentation, preparation of samples, and chain-of-custody form(s) fortransfer to a laboratory(ies), will be in accordance with the ORO's plans / procedures.The FMTs and/or other sampling personnel must secure ingestion pathway samples fromagricultural products and water. Samples in support of relocation and return must be securedfrom soil, vegetation, and other surfaces in areas that received radioactive ground deposition.OROs must use Federal resources as identified in the NRF Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annexand other resources (e.g., compacts, the licensee, or nuclear insurers). Evaluation of thiscriterion will take into consideration the level of Federal and other resources participating in theexercise.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayThis sub-element wi 11 be not demonstrated during this exercise.Sub-element 4.c -Laborator' Op:eratio..nsIntentThis Sub-element is derived fiom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to peform laboratory analyses of radioactivity in air, liquid, and environmentalsamples to support protective action decision making.282Criterion 4.c.1: The laboratory is capable of performing required radiologicalanalyses to support protective action decisions. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, C.1,3; J.11)CC .--Dlfl -T A r1-l 1 -AD .fl -I ~ ~ fV .lY A I-_ 'A _ý111'A,1%1, UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationExtent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a fidl-scale, finctional,or tabletop exercise. Other means may include drills, seminars or training activities that wouldfidly demonstrate technical proficiency.The laboratory staff must demonstrate the capability to follow appropriate procedures forreceiving samples, including logging infornation, preventing contamination of thelaboratory(ies), preventing buildup of background radiation due to stored samples, preventingcross contamination of samples, preserving samples that may spoil (e.g., milk), and keeping trackof sample identity. In addition, the laboratory staff must demonstrate the capability to preparesamples for conducting measurements.The laboratory(ies) must be appropriately equipped to provide, upon request, timely analyses ofmedia of sufficient quality and sensitivity to support assessments and decisions anticipated in theORO's plans / procedures. The laboratory instrument calibrations must be traceable to standardsprovided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Laboratory methods used toanalyze typical radionuclides released in a reactor incident must be as described in theplans / procedures. New or revised methods may be used to analyze atypical radionuclidereleases (e.g., transuranics or as a result of a terrorist incident) or if warranted by incidentcircumstances. Analysis may require resources beyond those of the ORO.The laboratory staff must be qualified in radio-analytical techniques and contamination controlprocedures.OROs must use Federal resources as identified in the NRF Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annexand other resources (e.g., compacts, the licensee, or nuclear insurers). Evaluation of thiscriterion will take into consideration the level of Federal and other resources participating in theexercise.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of Playwill býn:iiot demonstrated duringl this exercise.EVALUATION AREA 5: Emergency Notification and Public InformationSub-element S.a -Activation of thePrompt Alert and Notification Sistem.IntentThis Sub-element is derived fiom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to provide prompt instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathwayEPZ. Specific provisions addressed in this 18&-element are derived firom the Guide for theEvaluation of Alert and Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, FEMIA-REP-JO(November 1985)..--- I 1 -1 ý I-I A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCriterion 5.a.1: Activities associated with primaiy alerting and notification of thepublic are completed in a timely manner following the initial decision by authorizedoffsite emergency officials to notify the public of an emergency situation. The initialinstructional message to the public must include as a mininium the elements requiredby current REP guidance. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, E. 5, 6, 7)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a fidl-scale orfinctional exercise, drills, or operational testing of equipment that would fidly demonstratecapability.Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to sequentially provide an alert signalfollowed by an initial instructional message to populated areas (permanent resident and transient)throughout the 10-mile plume EPZ. Following the decision to activate the alert and notificationsystem, OROs must complete system activation for primary alert / notification and disseminatethe information / instructions in a timely manner. For exercise purposes, timely is defined aswith a sense of urgency and without undue delay. If message dissemination is identified as nothaving been accomplished in a timely maimer, the evaluator(s) will document a specific delay orcause as to why a message was not considered timely.Procedures to broadcast the message must be fully demonstrated as they would in an actualemergency up to the point of transmission. Broadcast of the message(s) or test message(s) is notrequired. The procedures must be demonstrated up to the point of actual activation. The alertsignal activation should be simulated, not performed. Evaluations of EAS broadcast stationsmay also be accomplished through SAVs.The capability of the primary notification system to broadcast an instructional message on a24-hour basis must be verified during an interview with appropriate personnel from the primarynotification system, including verification of provisions for backup power or an alternate station.The initial message must include at a minimum the following elements:* Identification of the ORO responsible and the official with authority for providing thealert signal and instructional message;* Identification of the commercial NPP and a statement that an emergency exists there;* Reference to REP-specific emergency information (e.g., brochures, calendars, and/orinformation in telephone books) for use by the general public during an emergency;* A closing statement asking that the affected and potentially affected population staytuned for additional information, or that the population tune to another station foradditional information.If route alerting is demonstrated as a primary method of alert and notification, it must be done inaccordance with the ORO's plans / procedures and the Extent-of-Play Agreement. OROs mustdemonstrate the capability to accomplish the primary route alerting in a timely manner (notsubject to specific time requirements). At least one route needs to be demonstrated andevaluated. The selected route(s) must vary2tlmn exercise to exercise. However, the mostdifficult route(s) must be demonstrated no less than once every 8 years. All alert and notificationactivities along the route(s) must be simulated (that is, the message that would actually be used isCC A oDr-W -r A --7K U4* AD f -I I vrC- nC DT A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationread for the evaluator, but not actually broadcast) as negotiated in the extent of play. Actualtesting of the mobile public address system will be conducted at an agreed-upon location.OROs may demonstrate any means of primary alert and notification included in theirplans / procedures as negotiated in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayMEMA SEOC: Actions to demonstrate performance of initial notification of the public will beperformed up to the point of actual..,transmission of the Emergency Alert Systeiii.(EAS) message.The EAS message will be prepared / elq6ded by MEMA.`The State Primary EAS Station ofWBZ will be contacted only once and notified that activations of the EAS System will behandled out of the SEOC. Actual activation of the Emergency Alert System will be simulated by!SEOC staff.:The MA SEOC in coordination with New Hampshire will demonstrate the actions necessary to:perform the siren activation up to the point of actually sounding the sirens. Sir6ii sounding willWffbe sirmulated.Criterion 5. a.2: [RESERVED]Criterion 5.a.3: Backup alert and notification of the public is completed within areasonable time following the detection by the ORO of a failure of the primary alertand notification system. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, E.6, Appendix 3.B.2.c)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a fidl-scale orfinctional exercise, drills, or operational testing of equipment that would filly demonstratecapability.If the exercise scenario calls for failure of any portion of the primary system(s) or if any portionof the primary system(s) actually fails to function during the exercise, OROs must demonstratebackup means of alert and notification. Backup means of alert and notification will differ fromfacility to facility.Backup alert and notification procedures that would be implemented in multiple stages must bestructured such that the population closest to the plant (e.g., within 2 miles) is alerted andnotified first. The populations farther away and downwind of any potential radiological releasewould be covered sequentially (e.g., 2 to 5 miles, followed by downwind 5 to 10 miles, andfinally the remaining population as directed by authorities). Topography, population density,existing ORO resources, and timing will be considered in judging the acceptability of backupmeans of alert and notification. 285Although circumstances may not allow this for all situations, FEMA and the NRC recommendthat OROs and operators attempt to establish backup means that will reach those in the plumeCýA ..n T^ 0- 11n1 D .n 1A I VT T n'E .1K AV-UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationexposure EPZ within a reasonable time of failure of the primary alert and notification system,with a recomnmended goal of 45 minutes. The backup alert message must, at a minimum, include(1) a statement that an emergency exists at the plant and (2) instructions regarding where toobtain additional information.If backup route alerting is demonstrated, only one route needs to be selected and demonstrated.All alert and notification activities along the route(s) must be simulated (that is, the message thatwould actually be used is read for the evaluator, but not actually broadcast), as negotiated in theextent of play. Actual testing of the mobile public address system will be conducted at anagreed-upon location.OROs may demonstrate any means of backup alert and notification included in theirplans / procedures as negotiated in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of Playm.' ..... ............. Vý 1 ...... ........ ......... .. .... .. ......This sub-element will not be demonstrated in this Criterion 5.a.4: Activities associated with FEMA-approved exception areas (whereapplicable) are completed in a timely manner following the initial decision byauthorized offsite emergency officials to notify the public of an emergency situation.(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, E.6; Appendix 3.B.2.c)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a full-scale orfunctional exercise, drills, or operational testing of equipment that would fully demonstratecapability.OROs with FEMA-approved exception areas (identified in the approved Alert and NotificationSystem Design Report), 5 to 10 miles from the NPP, must demonstrate the capability toaccomplish primary alerting and notification of the exception area(s). FEMA and the NRCrecommend that OROs and operators establish means that will reach those in approved exceptionareas in a timely manner, with a recommended goal of 45 minutes, once the initial decision ismade by authorized offsite emergency officials to notify the public of an incident. The exceptionarea alert message must, at a minimum, include (1) a statement that an emergency exists at theplant and (2) instructions regarding where to obtain additional information.For exception area alerting, at least one route must be demonstrated and evaluated. The selectedroute(s) must vary from exercise to exercise. However, the most difficult route(s) must bedemonstrated no less than once every 8 years. All alert and notification activities along theroute(s) must be simulated (that is, the message that would actually be used is read for theevaluator, but not actually broadcasted) as negotiated in the extent of play. Actual testing of themobile public address system will be an agreed-upon location. For exception areasalerted by aircraft, actual flights will be negotiated in the extent of play, but must bedemonstrated no less than once every 8 years.-A -n- -A -n- ý A ý ýA I A -C- nC DT A ý.--- I A _P A IIn, ý UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationAll activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of Play.This sub-element will not be demonstrated in this exercise.Sub-element 5. b -Emereency In forlation and Instructionsfor."the Public and tlhe Mdi.i(...,IntentThis Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to disseminate appropriate emergency information and instructions, including any'recommended protective actions, to the public, hI addition, NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1requires OROs to ensure that the capability exists for providing information to the media. Thisincludes the availability of a physical location for use by the media during an emergency.NUREG-0654/FEM44-REP-1 also provides that a system must be available for dealing withrumors. This system will hereafter be known as the "public inquiry hotline. "Criterion 5.b.l: OROs provide accurate subsequent emergency information andinstructions to the public and the news media in a timely manner.(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, E.5, 7; G.3.a, G.4.a, c)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a fidl-scale orfunctional exercise, or drills.The responsible ORO personnel / representatives must demonstrate actions to provideemergency information and instructions to the public and media in a timely manner following theinitial alert and notification (not subject to specific time requirements). For exercise purposes,timely is defined as with a sense of urgency and without undue delay. If message disseminationis identified as not having been accomplished in a timely manner, the evaluator(s) will documenta specific delay or cause as to why a message was not considered timely.Message elements: The ORO must ensure that emergency information and instructions areconsistent with PADs made by appropriate officials. The emergency information must containall necessary and applicable instructions (e.g., evacuation instructions, evacuation routes,reception center locations, what to take when evacuating, shelter-in-place instructions,information concerning protective actions for schools and persons with disabilities andaccess / functional needs, and public inquiry hotline telephone number) to assist the public incarrying out the PADs provided. The ORO must also be prepared to disclose and explain theECL of the incident. At a minimum, this information must be included in media briefings and/ormedia releases. OROs must demonstrate the capability to use language that is clear andunderstandable to the public within both the plume and ingestion exposure pathway EPZs. Thisincludes demonstration of the capability to u28fmiliar landmarks and boundaries to describeprotective action areas.-A .. -TAT -"1K1. An I*1' I" A 1- -T AV-D- -. -c IC -A'Al UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationThe emergency information must be all-inclusive by including the four items specified underexercise Demonstration Criterion 5.a.1 and previously identified protective action areas that arestill valid, as well as new areas. The OROs must demonstrate the capability to ensure thatemergency information that is no longer valid is rescinded and not repeated by broadcast media.In addition, the OROs must demonstrate the capability to ensure that current emergencyinformation is repeated at pre-established intervals in accordance with the plans / procedures.OROs must demonstrate the capability to develop emergency information in a non-Englishlanguage when required by the plans / procedures.If ingestion pathway measures are exercised, OROs must demonstrate that a system exists forrapid dissemination of ingestion pathway information to pre-determined individuals andbusinesses in accordance with the ORO's plans / procedures.Media information: OROs must demonstrate the capability to provide timely, accurate,concise, and coordinated information to the news media for subsequent dissemination to thepublic. This would include demonstration of the capability to conduct timely and pertinent mediabriefings and distribute media releases as the incident warrants. The OROs must demonstrate thecapability to respond appropriately to inquiries from the news media. All information presentedin media briefings and releases must be consistent with PADs and other emergency informationprovided to the public. Copies of pertinent emergency information (e.g., EAS messages andmedia releases) and media information kits must be available for dissemination to the media.Public inquiry: OROs must demonstrate that an effective system is in place for dealing withcalls received via the public inquiry hotline. Hotline staff must demonstrate the capability toprovide or obtain accurate information for callers or refer them to appropriate informationsource. Information from the hotline staff, including information that corrects false or inaccurateinformation when trends are noted, must be included, as appropriate, in emergency informationprovided to the public, media briefings, and/or media releases.HAB considerations: The dissemination of information dealing with specific aspects of NPPsecurity capabilities, actual or perceived adversarial (terrorist) force or threat, and tactical lawenforcement response must be coordinated / communicated with appropriate security authorities,e.g., law enforcement and NPP security agencies, in accordance with ORO plans / procedures.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of Play:Subsequent emergency ation and instrructions should be provided to the public and the.,media in a timely.manner.Joint Information Center: Rumor trends generated as a result of public inquiry calls to the Mass-.211 Public Infonnation Line will be included in news briefings by the MEMA PIO. (Incompliance with NIMS terminology, Rumor Control is now considered to be "Public Inquiry").It is possible during a HAB incident, that a "vin '" JIC will be opened at MEMA's SEOC."virtual" JIC will be connected to and d recty communicate with the NPP's JIC throughSelectronic means.CU-Afllffl CIAn rIlnt A D IflI A UVCCNII -VC -T *1.1 A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Station.. *.... , 9.. 99 " "":State EOC: Simulation Cell personnel will make calls simulating members of the public to the111Mass-21 1 Public Information Line. This process will commence&after the initial:siren activation.Information on rumor trend..s re.ognized at the Mass-211 Public Information Line will be ,. ,'forwarded to the Public: Affairs O'fficc at the SEOC. .... ..Mass-2 11 Operations Center: Staff from Mass-2 11 will demonstrate the ability to handle inquirycalls. Handling at least two rumor trends will be demonstrated..EPZ Towns: Simulation Cell personnel at the SEOC will make calls to the local EOCssimulating members of the public with inquiries. Each local EO'C will demonstrate the ability to:properly handle these inquiries..-HAB exercises will demonstratie iat public information relating to security matters should.receive approval of the Unified Command before release. Each ORO should only be reporting:ion their operation and not on others sucli as the law enforcement aspects.-L :.. ....... .. .......... .......... .... ... .. ......... ... ... ....... .. .......... ..... .................. ........ ........NOTE: "On the Spot" corrections approved for the fore mentioned sub-elements. Thatportion of the evaluation element dealing with "tinely manner" and emergencvinformation being all-inclusive. Players should have the opportunity to re-demonstratethis criterion in subsequent messages.Note: If during the exercise, a participant demonstrates this sub-element unsatisfactorily, theFEMA Evaluator will inform the participant and the Controller. After an "on the spot" re-training by the state or local organization, the FEMA Evaluator will provide the participantanother opportunity to re-demonstrate the activity that same day.EVALUATION AREA 6: Support Operation/Facilitiesj'ub-"element 6.a -Monitoring, Decontantitonand Regtstratton of EvacueesIntentThis Sub-element is derived firom NUREG-0654/FEMA'-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to implement radiological monitoring and decontamination of evacuees, whileminimizing contamination of the facilit,. OROs must also have the capability to identify andregister evacuees at reception centers.Criterion 6.a.l: The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequateresources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, andregistration of evacuees. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, A.3; C.4; J.10.h; J.12)Extent of Play 289Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a fidl-scale orfinctional exercise, drills, or SA V.-A D13- -A -- ý AD -I A --- --A ý.--- I I -CAI-A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationRadiological monitoring, decontamination, and registration facilities for evacuees must be set upand demonstrated as they would be in an actual emergency or as indicated in the Extent-of-PlayAgreement. OROs conducting this demonstration must have one-third of the resources(e.g., monitoring teams / instrumentation / portal monitors) available at the facility(ies) asnecessary to monitor 20 percent of the population within a 12-hour period. This would includeadequate space for evacuees' vehicles. Availability of resources can be demonstrated with validdocumentation (e.g., MOU/LOA, etc.) reflecting how necessary equipment would be procuredfor the location. Plans / procedures must indicate provisions for service animals.Before using monitoring instrument(s), the monitor(s) must demonstrate the process of checkingthe instrument(s) for proper operation. Staff responsible for the radiological monitoring ofevacuees must demonstrate the capability to attain and sustain, within about 12 hours, amonitoring productivity rate per hour needed to monitor the 20 percent EPZ population planningbase. The monitoring productivity rate per hour is the number of evacuees that can bemonitored, per hour, by the total complement of monitors using an appropriate procedure. Fordemonstration of monitoring, decontamination, and registration capabilities, a minimum of sixevacuees must be monitored per station using equipment and procedures specified in theplans / procedures. The monitoring sequences for the first six simulated evacuees per monitoringteam will be timed by the evaluators to determine whether the 12-hour requirement can be met.OROs must demonstrate the capability to register evacuees upon completion of the monitoringand decontamination activities. The activities for recording radiological monitoring and, ifnecessary, decontamination must include establishing a registration record consisting of theevacuee's name, address, results of monitoring, and time of decontamination (if any), or asotherwise designated in the plan and/or procedures. Audio recorders, camcorders, or writtenrecords are all acceptable means for registration.Monitoring activities shall not be simulated. Monitoring personnel must explain use oftrigger / action levels for determining the need for decontamination. They must also explain theprocedures for referring any evacuees who cannot be adequately decontaminated for assessmentand follow-up in accordance with the ORO's plans / procedures. All activities must be based onthe ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unlessnoted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Decontamination of evacuees may be simulated and conducted by interview. Provisions forseparate showering and same-sex monitoring must be demonstrated or explained. The staff mustdemonstrate provisions for limiting the spread of contamination. Provisions could include floorcoverings, signs, and appropriate means (e.g., partitions, roped-off areas) to separateuncontaminated from potentially contaminated areas. Provisions must also exist to separatecontaminated and uncontaminated evacuees, provide changes of clothing for those withcontaminated clothing; and store contaminated clothing and personal belongings to preventfurther contamination of evacuees or facilities. In addition, for any evacuee found to becontaminated, procedures must be discussed concerning handling of potential contamination ofvehicles and personal belongings. Waste water from decontamination operations does not needto be collected.209Individuals who have completed monitoring (aM -lecontamination, if needed) must have means(e.g., hand stamp, sticker, bracelet, form, etc) indicating that they, and their service animals andvehicles, where applicable, have been monitored, cleared, and found to have no contamination orCC
• DDC\C* QCT 1 U. -i' iA IA 1 .1~lT l l A In___ -_1A1 UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationcontamination below the trigger / action level, or have been placed in a secure area until they can bemonitored and decontaminated, if necessary.In accordance with plans / procedures, individuals found to be clean after monitoring do not needto have their vehicle monitored. These individuals do not require confirmation that their vehicleis free from contamination prior to entering the congregate care areas.However, those individuals who are found to be contaminated and are then decontaminated willhave their vehicles held in a secure area or monitored and decontaminated (if applicable) and dorequire confirmation that their vehicle is being held in a secure area or free from contaminationprior to entering the congregate care areas.Massachusetts Extent of Play.... ... ........... ... ... ........ ....... ..... ...... ..... ........ ... .. ..... .. ..... ......... .......... .This sub-element will.not be.demonstrated during this exercise..Sub-element 6.b -Monitoring and Decontamin .ation of Emermency Worker EquipmentIntentThis Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA4-REP-1, which requires that OROs havethe capability to implement radiological monitoring and decontamination of emergency workersand their equipment, inchlsive of vehicles.Criterion 6.b.l: The facility/ORO has adequate procedures and resources toaccomplish monitoring and decontamination of emergency workers and theirequipment and vehicles. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, K.5.a, b)Extent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a fill-scale orfinctional exercise, drills, or SA V.The monitoring staff must demonstrate the capability to monitor emergency worker personneland their equipment and vehicles for contamination in accordance with the ORO'splans / procedures.Specific attention must be given to equipment, including any vehicles that were in contact withcontamination. The monitoring staff must demonstrate the capability to make decisions on theneed for decontamination of personnel, equipment, and vehicles based on trigger/action levelsand procedures stated in the ORO plans / procedures. Monitoring of emergency workers doesnot have to meet the 12-hour requirement. However, appropriate monitoring procedures must bedemonstrated for a minimum of two emergency workers and their equipment and vehicles.Before using monitoring instrument(s), the monitor(s) must demonstrate the process of checkingthe instrument(s) for proper operation.The area to be used for monitoring and decoa4nination must be set up as it would be in anactual emergency, with all route markings, instrumentation, record keeping, and contaminationcontrol measures in place. Monitoring procedures must be demonstrated for a minimum of onevehicle. It is generally not necessary to monitor the entire surface of vehicles. However, theCý A DDý Qý A -ý- U AD -I A --- -nT A ý.--- 1. -1 11-A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationcapability to monitor areas such as radiator grills, bumpers, wheel wells, tires, and door handlesmust be demonstrated. Interior surfaces of vehicles that were in contact with contaminatedindividuals must also be checked.Decontamination of emergency workers may be simulated and conducted via interview.Provisions for separate showering and same-sex monitoring must be demonstrated or explained.The staff must demonstrate provisions for limiting the spread of contamination. Provisions couldinclude floor coverings, signs, and appropriate means (e.g., partitions, roped-off areas) toseparate uncontaminated from potentially contaminated areas. Provisions must also exist toseparate contaminated and uncontaminated individuals where applicable; provide changes ofclothing for those with contaminated clothing; and store contaminated clothing and personalbelongings to prevent further contamination of emergency workers or facilities.Monitoring activities shall not be simulated. Monitoring personnel must explain use oftrigger/action levels for determining the need for decontamination. They must also explain theprocedures for referring any emergency workers who cannot be adequately decontaminated forassessment and follow-up in accordance with the ORO's plans / procedures.Decontamination capabilities and provisions for vehicles and equipment that cannot besuccessfully decontaminated may be simulated and conducted by interview. Waste water fromdecontamination operations does not need to be collected.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayThis sub-element will not be demonstrated during this exercise"Sfibeleimiiient 6 Tern ivCare "f ...cuees: ..IntentThis Sub-element is derived friom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-], which requires OROs to have thecapability to establish relocation centers in host / support jurisdictions. The American RedCross normally provides congregate care in support of OROs under existing letters ofagreement.Criterion 6.c.1: Managers of congregate care facilities demonstrate that the centershave resources to provide services and accommodations consistent with AmericanRed Cross planning guidelines. Managers demonstrate the procedures to assurethat evacuees have been monitored for contamination and have beendecontaminated as appropriate prior to entering congregate care facilities.(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, J.10.h, J.12)Extent of Play292Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion mnay be accomplished during a full-scale orfunctional exercise, drills, or SA V.-A -ýýW Cý A -ý- ý An 1A I A --Tý nC nf AV.--- 1. -1 A I-A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationThe evaluator must conduct a walk-through of the center to determine, through observation andinquiries, that the services and accommodations are consistent with applicable guidance.For planming purposes, OROs must plan for a sufficient number of congregate care centers in host/supportjurisdictions based on their all-hazard sheltering experience and what is historically relevant for thatparticular area. In this simulation, it is not necessary to set up operations as they would be in an actualemergency. Alternatively, capabilities may be demonstrated by setting up stations for various services andproviding those services to simulated evacuees. Given the substantial differences between demonstrationand simulation of this criterion, exercise demonstration expectations must be clearly specified inExtentof-Play Agreements.Congregate care staff must also demonstrate the capability to ensure that evacuees, serviceanimals, and vehicles have been monitored for contamination, decontaminated as appropriate,and registered before entering the facility.Individuals arriving at congregate care facilities must have means (e.g., hand stamp, sticker,bracelet, form, etc.) indicating that they, and their service animals and vehicles, whereapplicable, have been placed in a secured area or monitored, cleared, and found to have nocontamination or contamination below the trigger/action level.In accordance with plans / procedures, individuals found to be clean after monitoring do not needto have their vehicle monitored. These individuals do not need confirmation that their vehicle isfree from contamination prior to entering the congregate care areas.However, those individuals who are found to be contaminated and are then decontaminated willhave their vehicles held in a secure area until they can be monitored and decontaminated (ifapplicable) and do need confirmation that their vehicle is being held in a secure area or free fromcontamination prior to entering the congregate care areas. This capability may be determinedthrough an interview process.If operations at the center are demonstrated, material that would be difficult or expensive totransport (e.g., cots, blankets, sundries, and large-scale food supplies) need not be physicallyavailable at the facility(ies). However, availability of such items must be verified by providingthe evaluator a list of sources with locations and estimates of quantities.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayThis will not be demonstrated during this exercise.[ S li-lem nt6d -" " " ......... "'... .. ...... .]Sbelement 6 .d -Traisportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals ..IntentThis Sub-element is derived from NUREG-O64i#rEMA-REP-J, which requires that OROs havethe capability to transport contaminated injured individuals to medical facilities with thecapability to provide medical se-vices.CC A CDý- -A -- U A ý -A C-Q- -D1 A ý.___ 41 -1111InIA UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook StationCriterion 6.d.1: The facility/ORO has the appropriate space, adequate resources,and trained personnel to provide transport, monitoring, decontamination, andmedical services to contaminated injured individuals. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, F.2; H.10; K.5.a, b; L.1, 4)Ex-tent of PlayAssessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial exercise, an actualevenit, or drills.FEMA has determined that these capabilities have been enhanced and consistently demonstrated asadequate; therefore, offsite medical services drills need only be evaluated biennially. FEMA will, at therequest of the involved ORO, continue to evaluate the drills on an annual basis. If more than two medicalfacilities and transportation providers are designated as primary or backup, they are also evaluatedbiennially.Monitoring, decontamination, and contamination control efforts must not delay urgent medical care forthe victim.OROs must demonstrate the capability to transport contaminated injured individuals to medical facilities.An ambulance must be used for response to the victim. However, to avoid taking an ambulanceout of service for an extended time, OROs may use any vehicle (e.g., car, truck, or van) totransport the victim to the medical facility. It is allowable for an ambulance to demonstrate up tothe point of departure for the medical facility and then have a non-specialized vehicle transportthe "victim(s)" to the medical facility. This option is used in areas where removing an ambulancefrom service to drive a great distance (over an hour) for a drill would not be in the best interestsof the community.Normal communications between the ambulance/dispatcher and the receiving medical facilitymust be demonstrated. If a substitute vehicle is used for transport to the medical facility, thiscommunication must occur before releasing the ambulance from the drill. This communicationwould include reporting radiation monitoring results, if available. In addition, the ambulancecrew must demonstrate, by interview, knowledge of where the ambulance and crew would bemonitored and decontaminated, if required, or whom to contact for such information.Monitoring of the victim may be performed before transport or en route, or may be deferred tothe medical facility. Contaminated injured individuals transported to medical facilities aremonitored as soon as possible to assure that everyone (ambulance and medical facility) is awareof the medical and radiological status of the individual(s). However, if an ambulance defersmonitoring to the medical facility, then the ambulance crew presumes that the patient(s) iscontaminated and demonstrate appropriate contamination controls until the patient(s) ismonitored. Before using monitoring instruments, the monitor(s) must demonstrate the process ofchecking the instrument(s) for proper operation. All monitoring activities must be completed asthey would be in an actual emergency. Appropriate contamination control measures must bedemonstrated before and during transport and at the receiving medical facility.The medical facility must demonstrate the c bility to activate and set up a radiologicalemergency area for treatment. Medical faciftWs are expected to have at least one trainedphysician and one trained nurse to perform and supervise treatment of contaminated injuredý ý A DDnný -A -n- ý AD ýA I A --CN- ýý DI A ý.--- -_rA1I-UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (PEP)After Action Report/Improvement Plan Seabrook Stationindividuals. Equipment and supplies must be available for treatment of contaminated injuredindividuals.The medical facility must demonstrate the capability to make decisions on the need fordecontamination of the individual, follow appropriate decontamination procedures, and maintainrecords of all survey measurements and samples taken. All procedures for collection andanalysis of samples and decontamination of the individual must be demonstrated or described tothe evaluator. Waste water from decontamination operations must be handled according tofacility plans / procedures.All activities must be based on the ORO's plans / procedures and completed as they would be inan actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.Massachusetts Extent of PlayýThis sub-element will not be demonstrated during this exercise.2950. A ..nnlfl C rrx A. * .fl Ufl C'Cnr CC .lY A Vn--- Al -ýýqI-A UnclassifiedRadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)After Action Report/Improvement PlanSeabrook StationThis page is intentionally blank.296}}