ML15337A282

Official Exhibit - NYS000566-00-BD01 - Figure 1 for Supplemental Reply Testimony of Dr. Richard T. Lahey

ML15337A282
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	09/09/2015
From:	State of NY, Office of the Attorney General
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
RAS 28270, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR
Download: ML15337A282 (1)

Text

FIGURE 1

Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BEe) and without embrittlement (BEne). Note: (1) BEne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL). (2) BEe predicts failure (CUFen = 1.0) before end of life. (3) BEe predicts possible failure well before end of life. BEne 1017 FLUENCE (n/cm2) CUFen Limit Line (LL) Best Estimate (BE) (3) BEe 1.0 (2) (1) - EOL (PEO) TIME FIGURE 1

Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BEe) and without embrittlement (BEne). Note: (1) BEne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL). (2) BEe predicts failure (CUFen = 1.0) before end of life. (3) BEe predicts possible failure well before end of life. BEne 1017 FLUENCE (n/cm2) CUFen Limit Line (LL) Best Estimate (BE) (3) BEe 1.0 (2) (1) - EOL (PEO) TIME