ML19289D963

From kanterella
Revision as of 10:44, 2 January 2025 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards QA Program Insp Rept 9990296/78-01 on 781127-30 & Notice of Violation
ML19289D963
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/08/1978
From: Potapovs U
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
AMERACE CORP.
Shared Package
ML19289D960 List:
References
REF-QA-99900296 NUDOCS 7903210146
Download: ML19289D963 (2)


Text

.

    • N Gu UNITED STATES f

q'c NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMM!SSION q

[f3,yt REClONIV

im i sii nvAN ptAz A onive. suite 1000

( yyg/ f AR LINGTON, TEXAS 76011 "Aj

    • o*

December 8, 1978 Docket iio. 99900296/78-01 Amerace Corporation Control Products Division ATTN:

Mr. B. Newman Vice President - Marketing 2330 Vauxhall Road Union, New Jersey 07033 Gentlemen:

This refers to the QA Program inspection conducted by Mr. W. E. Foster of this office on November 27-30, 1978, of your facility at Graf ton, Wisconsin associated with the fabrication of relays and t, the discus-sions of our findings with Mr. R. J. Bertling and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

This inspection was made to confirm that, in the areas inspected, your QA Program is being effectively implemented. The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a customer are being implemented; nor to assure that a specific product, component or service provided by you to your customers, is of acceptable quality.

As you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibility for the quality of specific products, components or services procured from others.

You should therefore not conclude that the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licensee or his agents r.or from taking effective corrective action in response to their findings.

Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report.

Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.

During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA Program failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and references to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.

Please provide us within thirty (30) days of your receipt of this report a written statement containing, (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items, (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence, and (3) the date your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed.

q 9 0 3 o 10 \\kC

~

Amerace Corporation December 8, 1978 In accordance with Section 2.793 of the Commission's " Rules of Practice,"

Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter with enclosure and your reply, together with the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the Commission's Public Document Room.

If this report contains any information that you believe to be proprietary, it is necessary that you make a written application within thirty (33) days to this office to withhold such information from public disclosure.

Any such application must include a full statement of the reasons on the basis of which it is claimed that the information is proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identifi d in the application is e

contained in a separate part of the document.

If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, _ _

r

(. '.

V Qu.,

._ O -1: [i.

Uldis Potapov's, Chi}f Vendor Inspection Branch

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Deviation 2.

Inspection Report No. 99900296/78-01