ML20004E678
| ML20004E678 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/31/1980 |
| From: | Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Berghis F INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING WORKS |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20004E679 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900724 NUDOCS 8106150031 | |
| Download: ML20004E678 (2) | |
Text
'
m,.
.[.5 *E'I UNITE 3 STATES o
~[*
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
, s' q q..j REGloN IV
(
f 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE. SulTE 1000 ARUNGToN. TEXAS 76011 Decemoer 31, 1980 Docket No. 99900724/30-01 5
N(&
Er, e
d.[ A i b rz Industrial Engineering Works b
JUN 01 E915 1 Attn: Mr. F. C. Berghis Vice President D "m"b'%"'*" )
Ward Avenue Ext., P. O. Box 8008 k
Trenton, New Jersey 08650 W
v
' cv Gentlemen:
This refers to the QA Program inspection conducted by Mr. Wm. D. Kelley of this office on October 20-21, 1980, of your facility at Trenton, New Jersey, associ-ated with the fabrication of structural ccmponents and to the discussion of our findings with you and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
This special inspection was made to confirm whether (1) the Tennessee Valley Authority reported deficiencies of rejectable voids and slag inclusions in the reactor vessel shield wall fabrication supplied by you for their Hartsville Nuclear Plant, Units A-1 and A-2, and (2) the Louisiana Power and Light Ccmpany reported deficiency of improper ultrasonic testing of reactor coolant pump supports, reactor coolant system pipe stops, pipe whip restraints, pressurizer supports, safety injection tank supports and other steel structures inside containment supplied by you for their Waterford SES, Unit No. 3, were properly processed and, evaluated to detennine the cause, corrective action, and report-ability, in a manner consistent with NRC requirements. As you know, the NRC requires each defect and/or deficiency of specific products, components or services to be evaluated to determine its cause, safety significance, generic impact, and reportability, in conformance with 10 CFR Part 21.
Areas examined during the inspection and our findings are oiscussed in the enclosed report. Within' these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
During this inspection, it was found that you failed to meet certain NRC require-monts as identified by your customer. The specific findings and references to the pertinent reouirements and corrective action taken in your plant and at the nuclear plant are identified in the enclosure to this letter.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the Comission's " Rules of Practice,"
Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter together with the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the Ccmission's Public Occument Room.
If this report contains any information tnat you believe to be procrietary, it is necessary that you make a written aoplication within thirty (30) days to this office to withhoid such information frcm puolic disclosure.
D106150CM
a Industrial Engineering Works 2
,, c x
.4a.
w.
Any such application must include a full statement of the reasons on the basis of which it is claimed that the information is propriet'ary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identified in the application is contained in a separate part of the document.
If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified period, the report will be pl. aced in the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
~3 i
N, I
Uldis Potapovs, Chief (Q Vendor Inspection Branch
Enclosures:
1.
Inspection Report No. 99900724/80-01 2.
Notice of Deviation 4
l
..,