ML20091C882

From kanterella
Revision as of 12:39, 13 December 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests NRC Institute Proceeding Pursuant to 10CFR2.202 to Suspend or Revoke Operating License of Facility
ML20091C882
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River 
Issue date: 06/25/1991
From: Putney L
PUTNEY, L.D.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
Shared Package
ML20091C862 List:
References
NUDOCS 9108070293
Download: ML20091C882 (3)


Text

__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _

L o

Louis D. PuTNey W9 at L AwALA r' t 64 lda..t) 8 d /I

  • f A a

8J HY ND WRONO L DLA H h ILLE. ENTATES AND ESTATE PLANvlNO June-25', 1991 CERTIFIED MAIL - P 397 879 423 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Executive Director for Operations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 RE:

Suspension or revocation of the nuclear

. operating license for Florida-Power's Crystal River Nuclear Plant (CR3)

Dear Sir:

I am writing on behalf of my client, Edward S. Wo11esen, pursuant to 10 CFR Part-2, Appendix C, S V.B.7, and 10 CFR S 2.206, to request that the NRC institute-a proceeding pursuant to 10 CFR S 2.202, to suspend or revoke the operating license of Florida Power's Crystal River nuclear plant, or for such other action as may be proper.

6 The specific grounds for this request are observations of my client during his employment as a Senior Quality Assurance Auditor for Florida Power-Corporation at its Crystal-River nuclear power plant (CR3) until his termination on May-10, 1991.

These i

observations-include the following:

1 1.

1,500 to;3,000 instruments insthe nuclear plant, most of which are identified-to be safety related or important to safety, are not being controlled as required by the regulations of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, that 1

is, they are not properly identified and are not in a proper calibration program.

Therefore, the operability of these instruments,-which are relied upon by the nuclear operators, L

-is questionable. - This is obviously a very serious = nuclear safety concern.. In more technical terms,1these~ instruments-are not in Florida Power's Configuration Management l

Information: System (CMIS), therefore there are.no controlled L

calibration data sheets relating to these instruments.

As a result, it is impossible for Florida-Power to determine that 9108070293 910731 ADO --- 006698 ADOCK 0500 j2 9 f,6 3 ( j v. p,_ o z_

-gDR

s.

Executive Director for Operations June 25, 1991 Page the instruments meet or remain within their engineering design standards as required by the NRC.

Further, the engineering diagrams of the nuclear plant do not include these instruments, and the diagrams are not representative of the actual configuration of the plant, as required by the NRC.

2.

Florida Power stated in recent Quality Audit Reports (which are required by the NRC under Florida Power's license commitments) that various audited programs, including Security and Fire Protection, complied with NRC requirements.

The reports also stated that the programs needed to be defined.

In fact, the audited programs are not sufficiently defined so as to be auditable as required by the NRC.

These unaudited safety related programs give cause for great concern for the safety of the nuclear plant.

3.

Florida Power's license requirements with the NRC require it to meet the Technical Specifications (TS) for the nuclear plant.

Florida Power has not adequately defined and does not know the exact requirements of the Technical Specifications for the nuclear plant, therefore, Florida Power cannot accurately report that it in complying with the TS, and it is impossible to audit the TS program.

This is a serious nuclear safety concern.

4.

The NRC requires that Florida Power not include mandatory instructions in uncontrolled manuals used by nuclear operations (ANSI Standard N45.2.10-1973).

This is because uncontrolled manuals may be outdated, causing personnel to implement the wrong procedure.

Florida Power's Plant Review Committee Guidelines Manual, an uncontrolled manual, includes mandatory instructions for nuclear operations.

This is a serious nuclear safety concern.

5.

The January 1991 OPS Audit identified problems with instrument calibration at the nuclear plant.

Florida Power had recently adopted a program to remove the instrument calibration stickers from the plants instruments.

The stickers were the only place to obtain current information on the instruments.

In implementing this program, no verification of calibration was performed, therefore, there is no assurance these safety related instruments are in calibration as required by the NRC, When this problem was identified, audit management and the nuclear plant management told the audit team to forget the issue.

This is a serious nuclear safety concern.

w.

Executive Director for Operations June 25, 1991 Page Mr. Wo11esen maintains that these safety concerns can be substantiated through plant records, interviews with audit team members on cite, and through interviewr, with specific personnel familiar with these topics.

In fact, the NRC hac recognized some of these deficiencies for years, but has failed to act to correct them.

These deficiencies at the nucicar plant render the Quality Assurance Program, Fire Protection Program, and other progenma critical to nuclear safety ineffective resulting in a potentially catast rophic situation.

The NRC's failure to date to take effective action to correct this dangerous situation is iner.cu s able.

Specifically, in the cource of the NRC's proceedings pursuant to 10 CPR S 2.202, it is regeested that the NRC thoroughly investigate my client's allegations and, upon a determination that the allegations are founded, suspend or revoke Florida Power's operating license until such time as these serious safety deficiencies are corrected.

The NRC 10 requested to act quickly and decisively to protect public safety and the environment as a whole in accordance with it's Congressional mandate.

Sinceiely,

/T

/f

~

yJWW./g/ /

Louis D. Putney y

9 IDP/sj Enclosure (s) cc:

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Inspection and Enforcement The Honorable D. Robert Graham The Honorable Connie Mack The Honorable Michael B111rakis The Honorable Sam M. Gibbons The Honorable Clifford B. Stearns The Honorable C. W.

Bill Young The Honorable Lawton Chiles The Honorable David J. Fischer The Honorable Sandra W. Freedman The Honorable Curtis A. Rich, Sr.

Nuclear Information & Resource Service Public Citizen Union of Concerned Scientists Board of Directors, Florida Progress Corporation