ML20133F942

From kanterella
Revision as of 08:22, 12 December 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-327/85-38 & 50-328/85-38.Response Discussed W/Util & Task Force Members on 850625.Review of Mods Identified Eight Items of Concern
ML20133F942
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 06/27/1985
From: Walker R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Parris H
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
References
NUDOCS 8508080496
Download: ML20133F942 (2)


See also: IR 05000327/1985038

Text

'

Wic ]e L

.~

JUN 2 71985

Tennessee Valley Authority

ATTN:

Mr. H. G. Parris

Manager of Power and Engineering

500A Chestnut Street Tower II

Chattanooga, TN 37401

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

REPORT NOS. 50-327/84-38 AND 50-328/84-38

,

Thank you for your supplementary response of May 31, 1985, to our Notice of

Violation issued on February 13, 1985, concerning activities conducted at your

Sequoyah facility.

We have evaluated your response and found that it meets

the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201.

We will examine the implementation of your

-corrective actions during future inspections.

This response was further discussed on June 25, 1985, with the Sequoyah

Compliance Supervisor and several members of the task force who participated in

!

the review of facility modification packages requiring post-modification testing

and furictional testing.

It is our understanding that the task force screened a

total of 473 modification packages for selection of further review which appeared

to be safety related modifications and requiring functional or post-modification

testing.

In the initial survey, 25 modifications received in-depth review;

however, af ter identification of several items of concern, the scope of the

review was expanded.

As a result, a total of 124 modifications were reviewed and

eight items of concern were subsequently identified.

Furthermore, it is our

undert,tanding that the recommendations made to strengthen programmatic areas of

Sequoyah's testing program . outlined in your response are in fact commitments.

Should you have any questions regarding this understanding, we will be pleased to

discuss them.

We appreciate your cooperation in this matter.

Sincerely,

Original Signed by

Roger D. Walker

Roger D. Walker, Director

Division of Reactor Projects

l

j

cc:

H. L. Abercrombie, Sequoyah Nuclear

i

Plant Site Director

j

P. R. Wallace, Plant Manager

cc:

(continued on page 2)

'

,

,

A

J27

sf ol i o

l

o

,

a

<

-

-

..

6-

Tennessee Valley Authority

2

JUN 2 71985

cc:

J. W. Anderson, Manager

Office of Quality Assurance

K. W. Whitt, Chief, Nuclear Safety Staff

D. L. Williams, Jr. , Supervisor

Licensing Section

J. E. Wills, Project Engineer

bec: Document Control Desk

State of Tennessee

NRC Resident Inspector

RII

RII

RII

d0 /

50c$

W

!

Algnatehls:es

SWeise

DVerrelli

l

6/jt/85

6/JU85

6/ (c/85

1

!

. . .

-

- -

-

-

-

-