(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML20275A3342020-09-30030 September 2020 Comment (4675) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20275A3242020-09-29029 September 2020 Comment (4674) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20272A0432020-09-25025 September 2020 Comment (4672) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20272A0422020-09-24024 September 2020 Comment (4671) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20272A0412020-09-24024 September 2020 Comment (4670) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4642020-09-24024 September 2020 Comment (4669) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4632020-09-24024 September 2020 Comment (4668) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4612020-09-24024 September 2020 Comment (4667) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4552020-09-24024 September 2020 Comment (4666) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4532020-09-24024 September 2020 Comment (4664) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4542020-09-24024 September 2020 Comment (4665) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4432020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4657) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20267A1752020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (105) from Lonnie Clark on Holtec International HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Project ML20269A3742020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4632) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20267A1902020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (111) from Pia Salazar on Holtec International HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Project ML20267A2042020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (113) from Zoilo Dominguez on Holtec International HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Project ML20269A3982020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4642) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4142020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4646) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4152020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4647) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A3892020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4637) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4522020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4663) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4512020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4662) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4492020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4660) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4452020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4659) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4442020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4658) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A3632020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4628) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4032020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4644) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4022020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4643) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A3942020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4640) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A3912020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4638) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A3882020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4636) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A3862020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4635) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A3762020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4634) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A3752020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4633) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4122020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4645) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A3652020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4630) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A3642020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4629) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4222020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4651) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4422020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4656) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4332020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4655) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4322020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4654) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4312020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4653) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20269A4242020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4652) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS ML20267A1792020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (108) from Erica Gray on Holtec International HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Project ML20269A3362020-09-23023 September 2020 Comment (4623) E-mail Regarding Holtec-CISF Draft EIS 2020-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
Page 1 of 1 SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM-013 E-RIDS=ADM-03 ADD: Jill Caverly As of: 8/20/20 7:19 AM COMMENT (74) Received: August 19, 2020 Status: Pending_Post PUBLIC SUBMISSION PUBLICATION DATE:
3/20/2020 CITATION 85 FR 16150 Tracking No. 1k4-9ih7-3buw Comments Due: September 22, 2020 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2018-0052 Holtec International HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Project Comment On: NRC-2018-0052-0376 Holtec International HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Project Document: NRC-2018-0052-DRAFT-0383 Comment on FR Doc # 2020-17536 Submitter Information Name: Gloria L Hacker General Comment Though you are now hosting public webinars for folks to review the Environmental Impact statement for the proposed Holtec interim storage facility, I feel that the general public, and most importantly, the residents of New Mexico are not cognizant to this project. There is little reporting about the Holtec Storage facility, with the news filled with Covid-19 stories, the upcoming election and the current economic turmoil. Unfortunately this means that the sentiment of most folks on the matter of storing high level nuclear waste stored in a facility in our state and the matter of its transport path across many communities across the country will be unheard. It feels that this is to be a rushed deal and that there may be unforeseen outcomes that can impact our communities in a negative way several years hence. We are a state that has water challenges and it is a fact that an underground aquifer exists in the region chosen for this facility. There may not be the expertise on the ground in Lea county to deal with any leakage problem, a possible contamination of the precious water. As well, there are many oil and gas drill sites in the region and having the nuclear storage facility nearby can pose a risk. There is the potential for an accident along the transport route and once this material is strewn across a landscape, the radioactive danger is hard to contain. I feel that this entire storage project poses too great a risk to the public. It would be wiser to have a long term mindset and work on finding a more suitable, geologically stable site that could be developed for long term, no interim storage. Meanwhile these products of the nuclear industry are best stored on site, where they can be monitored and not carried across miles of country, to a facility that is supposedly only interim.
https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=09000064848125fe&format=xml&showorig=false 08/20/2020