(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
---|
Category:Legal-Motion
MONTHYEARML24046A1402024-02-15015 February 2024 Beyond Nuclear V NRC (20-1187) - Joint Motion Re Oral Argument ML23229A6022023-08-15015 August 2023 8-15-23 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply (5th Cir.)(Case 23-60377) ML23161A0002023-06-0505 June 2023 6-5-23 Joint Motion to Govern Future Proceedings (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1187) ML21021A3832021-01-21021 January 2021 Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd.'S and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners' Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadlines ML20342A3952020-12-0707 December 2020 Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd.'S and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners' Combined Reply to NRC Staff'S and Holtec International'S Oppositions to Motion for Leave to File New Contention No. 3 and Motion to Reopen the Record ML20310A4462020-11-0505 November 2020 Exhibit 1 to Fasken and Pblro Motion for Leave to File New Contention 3 ML20310A4472020-11-0505 November 2020 Exhibit 2 to Fasken and Pblro Motion for Leave to File New Contention 3 ML20310A4492020-11-0505 November 2020 Exhibit 4 to Fasken and Pblro Motion for Leave to File New Contention 3 ML20310A4482020-11-0505 November 2020 Exhibit 3 to Fasken and Pblro Motion for Leave to File New Contention 3 ML20310A4422020-11-0505 November 2020 Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd.'S and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners Motion to Reopen the Record ML20310A4452020-11-0505 November 2020 Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd.'S and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners Motion for Leave to File New Contention No. 3 ML20307A8822020-11-0202 November 2020 Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd.'S and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners' Combined Reply to Oppositions to Their Notice of Appeal and Petition for Review of Atomic Safety Licensing Board'S Denial of Motion for Leave to File Amended Conten ML20273A0012020-09-28028 September 2020 Petitioners' Combined Notice of Appeal and Petition for Review of Aslb'S Denial of Motion for Leave to File Amended Contention and Motion to Reopen the Record ML20273A0042020-08-12012 August 2020 Exhibit 3 to Fasken and Pblros Combined Notice of Appeal and Petition for Review of Atomic Safety Licensing Boards Denial of Motion for Leave to File Amended Contention and Motion to Reopen the Record ML20273A0022020-08-0505 August 2020 Exhibit 1 to Fasken and Pblros Combined Notice of Appeal and Petition for Review of Atomic Safety Licensing Boards Denial of Motion for Leave to File Amended Contention and Motion to Reopen the Record ML20199M1482020-07-16016 July 2020 Response to Motion for Abeyance (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1187)(Consolidated with 20-1225) ML20199M1462020-07-16016 July 2020 Petitioners Response to Motion for Abeyance (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1187)(Consolidated with 20-1225) ML20206K8572020-07-16016 July 2020 Reply in Further Support of Motion for Abeyance (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1187)(Consolidated with 20-1225) ML20189A0262020-07-0606 July 2020 7-6-20 Motion for Abeyance (DC Cir.) (Case No. 20-1187) (Consolidated with 20-1225) ML20189A0182020-07-0202 July 2020 7-2-20 Sierra Club Motion to Intervene (DC Cir.) (Case No. 20-1187 (Consolidated with 20-1225) ML20132E7242020-05-11011 May 2020 Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd, and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners Motion to Reopen the Record ML20132F0472020-05-11011 May 2020 Exhibit 4 to Fasken Motion for Leave to File Amended Contention 2 - Amended Declaration of Stonnie Pollock ML20132F0332020-05-11011 May 2020 Exhibit 2 to Fasken Motion for Leave to File Amended Contention 2 - Facts Petitioners Intend to Rely on to Support New and Amended Contentions ML20132F0262020-05-11011 May 2020 Exhibit 1 to Fasken Motion for Leave to File Amended Contention 2 - Declaration of Tommy Taylor ML20132F0192020-05-11011 May 2020 Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd, and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners Motion for Leave to File Amended Contention No. 2 ML20125A0962020-05-0404 May 2020 Sierra Club'S Motion to Reopen the Record ML20093K5652020-04-0202 April 2020 Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd.'S and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners' Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadlines Pending the COVID-19 National Emergency ML20132F0402019-07-0202 July 2019 Exhibit 3 to Fasken Motion for Leave to File Amended Contention 2 - Letter from Stephanie Richard, New Mexico Public Lands Commissioner, to Krishna Singh, President of Holtec International ML19094B3972019-04-0101 April 2019 Federal Respondents' Motion to Dismiss, with Addendum and Exhibits (DC Cir.)(Case No. 18-1340)- 4/01/19 ML20273A0032019-01-24024 January 2019 Exhibit 2 to Fasken and Pblros Combined Notice of Appeal and Petition for Review of Atomic Safety Licensing Boards Denial of Motion for Leave to File Amended Contention and Motion to Reopen the Record 2024-02-15
[Table view] |
Text
Exhibit 3 August 12, 2020 Kristine L. Svinicki Chairwoman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738
Subject:
August 5, 2020 Oral Argument on Docket No. 72-1051-ISFSI (ML20177A577) before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ALSB)
Dear Chairwoman,
I am writing to register my strongest protest in regard to the manner in which the subject hearing was conducted.
On August 5th, 2020, Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd. and Permian Basin Coalition of Land and Royalty Owners and Operators (Petitioners) were prepared to present information to Judges Ryerson, Trikouros, and Arnold in the matter of ASLBP No.
18-958-01-ISFSI-BD01 and supportive of our two motions before the Board.
As set out by the July 25th ALSB subject Order, Petitioners were ... prepared to respond to the Boards questions on any aspect of the pleadings. We had been informed that we would be allowed to discuss and present information supporting our position. We were asked to introduce the persons making appearances at the outset of the call and did so, identifying both our counsel and our technical experts.
When the time came for our planned presentations to be made, we were not allowed to present the information. Judge Ryerson revoked our ability to have our experts heard and confined comments only to counsel, not the enumerated persons who had notified the ALSB at the outset that they were planning and prepared to comment on the matters before the Board.
If we had been notified in advance that only counsel would have been able to address the Board, we would have altered our presentation to present those facts. As it stands now, we were denied the ability to effectively defend the merits of our motions and several questions from the judges went unanswered as a result. From the meeting audio, you clearly hear multiple attempts to bring on the persons with the expertise to answer the questions while being denied the right to address those questions by the Chairman.
Petitioners have every right to fully and openly address the ALSB in regard to our motions and in a manner that speaks to the appropriate protections of our substantial assets, including our combined several hundred thousand acres of land, as well as significant mineral reserves that provide the United States with much needed energy security and independence.
We are very disappointed with the treatment we received by the ALSB Chairman that severely curtailed our ability to present the prepared defense of our motions. It is our sincere hope that both you and the Commission take appropriate measures to address this violation of our right to a fair hearing and to ensure such violations are not repeated in the future.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
/electronically signed by Monica Perales Monica Renee Perales, Esq.
6101 Holiday Hill Road Midland, TX 79707 Phone (432)687-1777 Attorney for Petitioners Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd. and Permian Basin Coalition of Land and Royalty Owners and Operators