ML20351A267
| ML20351A267 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/04/2021 |
| From: | Eugene Dacus Office of Congressional Affairs, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research |
| To: | |
| Roche-Rivera R | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20294A488 | List: |
| References | |
| RG-1.239 | |
| Download: ML20351A267 (2) | |
Text
Submission of Federal Rules Under the Congressional Review Act President of the Senate Speaker of the House of Representatives GAO Please fill the circles electronically or with black pen or #2 pencil.
- 1. Name of Department or Agency 2. Subdivision or Office U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
- 3. Rule Title Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.239 "Licensee Actions to Address Nonconservative Technical Specifications"
- 4. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) or Other Unique Identifier (if applicable)
- 5. Major Rule Non-major Rule
- 6. Final Rule Other Issuance of Regulatory Guide
- 7. With respect to this rule, did your agency solict public comments? Yes No N/A
- 8. Priority of Regulation (fill in one)
Economically Significant; or Routine and Frequent or Significant; or Informational/Administrative/Other Substantive, Nonsignificant (Do not complete the other side of this form if filled in above.)
- 9. Effective Date (if applicable)
- 10. Concise Summary of Rule (fill in one or both) attached stated in rule Submitted by: _____________________________ (signature)
Eugene Dacus Name: ____________________________________________________________________________________
Director, Office of Congressional Affairs
Title:
For Congressional Use Only:
Date Received: ________________
Committee of Jurisdiction: ____________________________
3/23/99
Yes No N/A A. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an analysis of costs and benefits?
B. With respect to this rule, by the final rulemaking stage, did your agency
- 1. certify that the rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under 5 U.S.C. § 605(b)?
- 2. prepare a final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)?
C. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare a written statement under
§ 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995?
D. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?
E. Does this rule contain a collection of information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?
F. Did you discuss any of the following in the preamble to the rule?
E.O. 12612, Federalism E.O. 12630, Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review E.O. 12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks Other statutes or executive orders discussed in the preamble concerning the rulemaking process (please specify) 3/23/99