ML20351A267
| ML20351A267 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/04/2021 |
| From: | Eugene Dacus Office of Congressional Affairs, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research |
| To: | |
| Roche-Rivera R | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20294A488 | List: |
| References | |
| RG-1.239 | |
| Download: ML20351A267 (2) | |
Text
Submission of Federal Rules Under the Congressional Review Act Please fill the circles electronically or with black pen or #2 pencil.
- 1. Name of Department or Agency
- 2. Subdivision or Office
- 3. Rule Title
- 4. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) or Other Unique Identifier (if applicable)
- 7. With respect to this rule, did your agency solict public comments?
- 8. Priority of Regulation (fill in one)
Economically Significant; or Significant; or Substantive, Nonsignificant Routine and Frequent or Informational/Administrative/Other (Do not complete the other side of this form if filled in above.)
- 9. Effective Date (if applicable)
- 10. Concise Summary of Rule (fill in one or both)
Submitted by: _____________________________ (signature)
Name: ____________________________________________________________________________________
Title:
For Congressional Use Only:
Date Received: ________________
Committee of Jurisdiction: ____________________________
3/23/99 5.
Major Rule Non-major Rule attached stated in rule Yes No N/A 6.
Final Rule Other President of the Senate GAO Speaker of the House of Representatives U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.239 "Licensee Actions to Address Nonconservative Technical Specifications" G
G Issuance of Regulatory Guide G
G G
Eugene Dacus Director, Office of Congressional Affairs
A.
With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an analysis of costs and benefits?
B.
With respect to this rule, by the final rulemaking stage, did your agency
- 1. certify that the rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under 5 U.S.C. § 605(b)?
- 2. prepare a final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)?
C.
With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare a written statement under
§ 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995?
D.
With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?
E.
Does this rule contain a collection of information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?
F.
Did you discuss any of the following in the preamble to the rule?
Yes No N/A G E.O. 12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership G E.O. 12630, Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights G E.O. 12612, Federalism G E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review G E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks G E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform G Other statutes or executive orders discussed in the preamble concerning the rulemaking process (please specify) 3/23/99 G
G G
G G
G G
G G
G G
G G