ML20125A205

From kanterella
Revision as of 22:07, 22 September 2022 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
9 to the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Chapter 2, Geography and Demography - Part 3 of 3
ML20125A205
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/28/2020
From:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20125A201 List:
References
NL-20-0442
Download: ML20125A205 (143)


Text

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-1 (SHEET 1 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-1 (SHEET 2 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-1 (SHEET 3 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-2 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-2 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [COMPACTED STATIC SOIL STRENGTH PROPERTIES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-3 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [COMPACTED STATIC SOIL STRENGTH PROPERTIES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-3 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [STATIC SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH PROPERTIES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-4 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [STATIC SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH PROPERTIES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-4 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [STATIC SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH PROPERTIES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-5 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [STATIC SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH PROPERTIES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-5 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [STATIC ROCK PROPERTIES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-6 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [STATIC ROCK PROPERTIES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-6 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [DYNAMIC SOIL AND ROCK PROPERTIES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-7 (SHEET 1 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [DYNAMIC SOIL AND ROCK PROPERTIES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-7 (SHEET 2 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [DYNAMIC SOIL AND ROCK PROPERTIES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-7 (SHEET 3 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOIL C-1 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-8 (SHEET 1 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOIL C-1 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-8 (SHEET 2 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOIL C-1 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-8 (SHEET 3 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-1 AND C-2 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-9 (SHEET 1 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-1 AND C-2 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-9 (SHEET 2 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-1 AND C-2 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-9 (SHEET 3 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-2 AND C-3 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-10 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-2 AND C-3 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-10 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT COMPACTED SOILS R-24, R-31 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-10A (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT COMPACTED SOILS R-24, R-31 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-10A (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOIL I UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-11 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOIL I UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-11 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOILS I AND II UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-12 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOILS I AND II UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-12 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOILS II AND III UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-13 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOILS II AND III UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-13 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT MATERIALS - - PLANT AREA AND SPILLWAY STRUCTURE UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-14 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT MATERIALS - - PLANT AREA AND SPILLWAY STRUCTURE UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-14 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT MATERIALS - - RIVER WATER SUPPLY LINE UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-15 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT MATERIALS - - RIVER WATER SUPPLY LINE UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-15 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR JOSEPH M. FARLEY FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - RIVER INTAKE STRUCTURE NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 AND STORAGE POND INTAKE STRUCTURE FIGURE 2B5B-16 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR JOSEPH M. FARLEY FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - RIVER INTAKE STRUCTURE NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 AND STORAGE POND INTAKE STRUCTURE FIGURE 2B5B-16 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT MATERIALS - - STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-17 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT MATERIALS - - STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-17 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT MATERIALS - - STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-18 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT MATERIALS - - STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-18 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS 1A, 1B, 2B, 2C, 3 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-19 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS 1A, 1B, 2B, 2C, 3 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-19 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT JOSEPH M. FARLEY MATERIALS, BORROW AREA NO. 1 NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 COMPACTED SOILS C-1, C-2, C-3 FIGURE 2B5B-20 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT JOSEPH M. FARLEY MATERIALS, BORROW AREA NO. 1 NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 COMPACTED SOILS C-1, C-2, C-3 FIGURE 2B5B-20 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT JOSEPH M. FARLEY MATERIALS, BORROW AREA NO. 1 NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 COMPACTED SOILS C-2, C-3 FIGURE 2B5B-21]

REV 21 5/08

[LABORATORY CYCLIC TEST RESULTS UNDISTURBED JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT SAMPLES UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-1 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[LABORATORY CYCLIC TEST RESULTS UNDISTURBED JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT SAMPLES UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-1 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM & DIKES RECORD OF A JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT TYPICAL STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-1A]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [CASE 1 - SWITCHYARD NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-2]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [CASE II - PLANT AREA NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-3]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [CASE III - SLOPES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-4]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [CASE III SLOPES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-5]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [CASE IV - COOLING TOWER AREA NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-6]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [CASE V - RIVER INTAKE AREA NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-7]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [CASE VI - STORAGE POND INTAKE AREA NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-8]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT DIKES MAXIMUM DAM SECTION UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-9]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT DIKES TYPICAL DIKE SECTION UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-10]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES JOSEPH M. FARLEY ACCELEROGRAM REPRESENTING THE POSTULATED NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 SAFE SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE FIGURE 2B6-11]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND JOSEPH M. FARLEY DIKES SAFE SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 SPECTRA FOR 5% SPECTRAL DRAWING FIGURE 2B6-12]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES COMPARISON OF INDUCED SHEAR STRESSED WITH STRESSES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN ALONG A TYPICAL UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 PLANE - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION AVERAGE PROPERTIES FIGURE 2B6-13]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5%

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES -

UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 MAXIMUM DAM SECTION, AVERAGE PROPERTIES FIGURE 2B6-14]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5%

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES -

UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 MAXIMUM DAM SECTION, UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES FIGURE 2B6-15]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5%

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - DIKE UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 SECTION, AVERAGE PROPERTIES FIGURE 2B6-16]

REV 21 5/08

[LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO JOSEPH M. FARLEY DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG CENTERLINE OF NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 DIKE, AVERAGE PROPERTIES FIGURE 2B6-17]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT SHEAR MODULUS VS EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-1]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY SHEAR MODULI AT EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 1000 LB/FT2 FIGURE 2B6A-2]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY SHEAR MODULI AT EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 1000 LB/FT2 FIGURE 2B6A-3]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY SHEAR MODULI AT EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 1000 LB/FT2 FIGURE 2B6A-4]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-5]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-6]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-7]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES EMBANKMENT JOSEPH M. FARLEY MATERIAL, STRAIN-COMPATIBLE SOIL PROPERTIES USED NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 IN ANALYSIS FIGURE 2B6A-8]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 TESTS (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)

FIGURE 2B6A-9]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 TESTS (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)

FIGURE 2B6A-10]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 TESTS (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)

FIGURE 2B6A-11]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 TESTS (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)

FIGURE 2B6A-12]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 TESTS (KC = 2.0, 5% STRAIN)

FIGURE 2B6A-13]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 TESTS (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)

FIGURE 2B6A-14]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 TESTS (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)

FIGURE 2B6A-15]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES PROCEDURE FOR INTERPRETING STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT TRIAXIAL TEST DATA FOR ANISOTROPICALLY UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 CONSOLIDATED (KC > 1.0) SPECIMENS FIGURE 2B6A-16]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 IN 10 CYCLES FIGURE 2B6A-17]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 IN 10 CYCLES FIGURE 2B6A-18]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 IN 10 CYCLES FIGURE 2B6A-19]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES FOUNDATION JOSEPH M. FARLEY SOILS - CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5%

NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES FIGURE 2B6A-20]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT COMPACTION TEST RESULTS UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-21]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT COMPACTION TEST RESULTS UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-22]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT COMPACTION TEST RESULTS UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-23]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-24]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-25]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-26]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [STORAGE POND DOWNSTREAM FILL CROSS-SECTIONS NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-14]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [STORAGE POND DOWNSTREAM FILL CROSS-SECTIONS NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-15]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [STORAGE POND UPSTREAM BLANKET CROSS-SECTIONS NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-16 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [STORAGE POND UPSTREAM BLANKET CROSS-SECTIONS NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-16 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT COMPACTION DATA UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 1 OF 5)]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT COMPACTION DATA UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 2 OF 5)]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT COMPACTION DATA UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 3 OF 5)]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT COMPACTION DATA UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 4 OF 5)]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT COMPACTION DATA UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 5 OF 5)]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE SLOPE STABILITY JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT ANALYSIS UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-18 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE SLOPE STABILITY JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT ANALYSIS UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-18 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS SITE SLOPES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-19 (SHEET 1 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS SITE SLOPES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-19 (SHEET 2 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS SITE SLOPES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-19 (SHEET 3 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT COMPACTION DATA UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 4 OF 5)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS SITE SLOPES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-20]

REV 21 5/08

[BORROW MATERIAL PROPERTIES FOR REDESIGN OF DAM JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT AND DIKE 95% ASTM D-698 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-21 (SHEET 1 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08

[BORROW MATERIAL PROPERTIES FOR REDESIGN OF DAM JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT AND DIKE 95% ASTM D-698 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-21 (SHEET 2 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08

[BORROW MATERIAL PROPERTIES FOR REDESIGN OF DAM JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT AND DIKE 95% ASTM D-698 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-21 (SHEET 3 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08

[BORROW MATERIAL PROPERTIES FOR REDESIGN OF DAM JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT AND DIKE 95% ASTM D-698 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-21 (SHEET 4 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08

[GRAIN SIZED - - COMPACTED BLANKET AND JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNDERLYING SOIL UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-22]

REV 21 5/08

[COMPARISON OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES BORROW AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT NO. 1 AND BORROW AREA NO. 2 95 PERCENT ASTM D-1557 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-23 (SHEET 1 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08

[COMPARISON OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES BORROW AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT NO. 1 AND BORROW AREA NO. 2 95 PERCENT ASTM D-1557 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-23 (SHEET 2 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08

[COMPARISON OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES BORROW AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT NO. 1 AND BORROW AREA NO. 2 95 PERCENT ASTM D-1557 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-23 (SHEET 3 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08

[COMPARISON OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES BORROW AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT NO. 1 AND BORROW AREA NO. 2 95 PERCENT ASTM D-1557 UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-23 (SHEET 4 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [MATERIAL C-5 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-24]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [MATERIAL C-5 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-25]

REV 21 5/08

[MATERIAL C 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION SHEAR JOSEPH M. FARLEY MODULI NORMALIZED TO AN EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT2 FIGURE 2B7-26]

REV 21 5/08

[MATERIAL C 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION DAMPING JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-27]

REV 21 5/08

[MATERIAL C 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)

FIGURE 2B7-28]

REV 21 5/08

[MATERIAL C 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)

FIGURE 2B7-29]

REV 21 5/08

[MATERIAL C 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION CYCLIC JOSEPH M. FARLEY SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 CYCLES FIGURE 2B7-30]

REV 21 5/08

[MATERIAL C 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)

FIGURE 2B7-31]

REV 21 5/08

[MATERIAL C 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)

FIGURE 2B7-32]

REV 21 5/08

[MATERIAL C 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION CYCLIC JOSEPH M. FARLEY SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 10 CYCLES FIGURE 2B7-33]

REV 21 5/08

[LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED JOSEPH M. FARLEY HORIZONTAL PLANES - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION - UPPER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 BOUND PROPERTIES - CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION FIGURE 2B7-34]

REV 21 5/08

[LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG CENTERLINE OF JOSEPH M. FARLEY MAXIMUM DAM SECTION - UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION FIGURE 2B7-35]

REV 21 5/08

[LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED JOSEPH M. FARLEY HORIZONTAL PLANES - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION UPPER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 BOUND PROPERTIES - CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 AT 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION FIGURE 2B7-36]

REV 21 5/08

[LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG CENTERLINE OF JOSEPH M. FARLEY MAXIMUM DAM SECTION - UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES -

NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 AT 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION FIGURE 2B7-37]

REV 21 5/08

[COMPARISON OF STRESSES AT DAM COMPUTED BY THE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT FINITE ELEMENT AND THE SHEAR SLICE PROCEDURE UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-38 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08

[COMPARISON OF STRESSES AT DAM COMPUTED BY THE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT FINITE ELEMENT AND THE SHEAR SLICE PROCEDURE UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-38 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 JOSEPH M. FARLEY [DAM EXCAVATION PLAN AND GEOLOGIC MAPS NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-39A]

REV 21 5/08

[DAM FOUNDATION GEOLOGIC MAP NORTH AND SOUTH JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT ELEVATIONS UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-39B]

REV 21 5/08

[DAM FOUNDATION GEOLOGIC MAP EAST AND WEST JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT ELEVATIONS UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-39C]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE COMPACTED FILL JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT RECORD TESTS UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-40 (SHEET 1 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE COMPACTED FILL JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT RECORD TESTS UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-40 (SHEET 2 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE COMPACTED FILL JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT RECORD TESTS UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-40 (SHEET 3 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE INSTRUMENTATION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT LOCATIONS UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-41

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE CENTERLINE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT SUBSURFACE PROFILES AND GROUNDWATER LEVELS UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-42]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE OBSERVATION WELLS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT AND DRAIN DISCHARGE RATES UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-43]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE GRAVITY RELIEF WELLS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT AND DISCHARGE RATES UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-44]