ML20206H537

From kanterella
Revision as of 09:14, 6 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses 990428 Telcon with a Frye of Redlands,Ca in Response to of Concern on Siting Oflinear Accelerator in Residential Area in El Dorado,Ks
ML20206H537
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/28/1999
From: Bolling L
NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP)
References
NUDOCS 9905110240
Download: ML20206H537 (2)


Text

- -- -

f$4/ .

[ $ . UNITED STATES j

j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 2008H001

% g# April 28, 1999 MEMORANDUM TO: KANSAS FILE FROM: Lloyd Bolling ,

4 Health Physicist Office of State Progr s{'

SUBJECT:

ALLEGATION REGARDING LINEAR ACCELERATOR- KANSAS

- On Wednesday April 28,1999, I telephoned Ms. Amanda Frye of Redlands, California in y response to her April 6,1999 letter of concern on the siting of a Linear Accelerator in a residential area in El Dorado, Kansas. Ms. Frye stated that her parents live next door to the proposed clinic. I explained to Ms. Frye that the NRC does not by law regulate these devices, and since they are regulated by the State of Kansas, her letter would be referred to the State. I asked whether she wanted her name withheld from the referral letter to Kansas and she replied, no.

Ms. Frye asked me which Federal agency " supervised" the use of Linear Accelerators in Kansas and if the Kansas regulations on Linear Accelerators are reviewed annually. I replied that I did not know. Ms. Frye stated that she had reviewed a copy of the Kansas radiation control regulations and that she felt they did not specifically address Linear' Accelerators. She further stated that a Zoning Board Meeting was scheduled to rule on this issue and that she was informed that this was "just a formality."

' I informed Ms. Frye that she would be provided with a copy of our referral letter to the State of Kansas.

cc: Vick Cooper, KS 9905110240 990428 PDR STPRO ESOKS PDR ,

x <

APR 2 81sts

. MEMORANDUM TO: KANSAS FILE

~ FROM: Lloyd Bolling Odeinal cicned by:

Health Physicist L'A Bollins v' i Office of State Programs

SUBJECT:

ALLEGATION REGARDING LINEAR ACCELERATOR- KANSAS On Wednesday April 28,1999, I telephoned Ms. Amanda Frye of Redlands, California in response to her April 6,1999 letter of concern on the siting of a Linear Accelerator in a residential area iri El Dorado, Kansas. Ms. Frye stated that her parents live next door to the -

proposed clinic. I explained to Ms. Frye that the NRC does not by law regulate these devices, and since they are regulated by the State of Kansas, her letter would be referred to the State. I asked whether she wanted her name withheld from the referral letter to Kansas and she replied, no.

Ms. Frye asked me which Federal agency " supervised" the use of Linear Accelerators in Kansas and if the Kansas regulations on Linear Accelerators are reviewed annually. I replied that I did not know. Ms. Frye stated that she had reviewed a copy of the Kansas radiation control regulations and that she felt they did not specifically address Linear Accelerators. She further stated that a Zoning Board Meeting was scheduled to rule on this issue and that she

. was informed that this was "just a formality."

I informed Ms. Frye that she would be provided with a copy of our referral letter to the State of Kansas.

cc: Vick Cooper, KS F

f Distribution:

DIR RF (9-71) .. . DCDiSP08)1 g SDroggitis PDR (YES.f_ NO )

MLMclean, RIV O

' MShaffer, RIV -

l Kansas File DOCUMENT NAME: G:\ LAB \Amanda.WPD TM receive e cop r of this tiocuenent, trulicate in the box: "C' = C attachment / enclosure 'E' = Copy with attachment! enclosure "N" No copy OFFICE OSP-/)) - l OSF .Wsl '

l l l NAME~ LBolling:kyh[fJ- PHLohaus DATE 04/Y9/96 - 04/22/99

, ggS OSP FILE CODE: SP-AG-10 ~'

lY Q W$

. _ .