ML20215A328
| ML20215A328 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 06/09/1987 |
| From: | Zwolinski J NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS |
| To: | White S TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| References | |
| GL-87-02, GL-87-2, NUDOCS 8706160617 | |
| Download: ML20215A328 (2) | |
Text
-
t June 9, 1987 Docket Nos. 50-327/328 DISTRIBUTION e0esteet>H ie. ACRS(10)
NRC PDR JPartlow Local PDR EJordan JAxelrad FMiraglia Mr. S. A. White SEbneter OGC-BETH Manager of Nuclear Pcwer SRichardson Projects Rdg.
Tennessee Valley Authority JZwolinski Sequoyah Rdg.
6N 38A Lookout Place BDLiaw TVA-BETH 1101 Market Street GZech, RII JDonohew Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801 SConnelly, OIA TRotella JHolonich
Dear Mr. White:
CJamerson JKelly
SUBJECT:
RELIEF FROM 60 DAY REPORTING REQUIREMENT OF GENERIC LETTER 87-02 Re: Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 By letter dated April 10, 1987, Mr. Neil P. Smith, Chairman of the Seismic Qualification Utility Group (SQUG), requested clarification of the 60-day reporting provision of Generic Letter (GL) 87-02. The NRC response to this request is enclosed. Please note that the extension of the reporting for GL 87-02 in the enclosed letter to Mr. Smith will affect the required response date for the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant.
The current schedule for the Sequoyah plant submittal in response to GL 87-02 is no later than December 1, 1987. If you should have questions regarding this change or the enclosed letter, please contact Thomas S. Rotella, Project Manager at(301)492-8199.
Sincerely, Original signed by:
John A. Zwolinski, Assistant Director for Projects TVA Projects Division
Enclosure:
As stated cc: See next page NfYCh P
7 OSP:DTVA OSP:DTVA OSh DTVA:AD/P CJamerson i TRotella:jg JDj JZwolinski b/9 /87 i
(,/i/87 /87 f /p /87 i
Mr. S. A. White Tennessee Valley Authority Sequoyah Nuclear Plant l
cc:
General Counsel Regioni1 Administrator, Region II Tennessee Valley Authority U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 400 West Sumit Hill Drive 101 Marietta Street, N.W.
E11 B33 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 Resident Inspector /Sequoyah NP Mr. R. L. Gridley c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Tennessee Valley Authority 2600 Igou Ferry Road SN 157B Lookout Place Soddy Daisy, Tennessee 37379 Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801 Mr. Richard King Mr. H. L. Abercrombie e/o U.S. GA0 Tennessee Valley Authority 1111 North Shore Drive Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Suite 225, Box 194 P.O. Box 2000 Knoxville, Tennessee 37919 Soddy Daisy, Tennessee 37379 Tennessee Department of Mr. M. R. Harding Public Health Tennessee Valley Authority ATTN: Director, Bureau of Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Environmental Health Services P.O. Box 2000 Cordell Hull Building Soddy Daisy, Tennessee 37379 Nashville, Tennessee 37219 Mr. D. L. Williams Mr. Michael H. Mobley, Director Tennessee Valley Authority Division of Radiological Health 400 West Sumit Hill Drive T.E.R.R.A. Building W10 B85 150 9th Avenue North Knoxvil'e, Tennessee 37902 Nashville, Tennessee 37203 County vudge Hamilton County Courthouse Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402 l
l l
l l
1
- ENCLOSURE :
- - UNITED STATES
,/ g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION om.o.c.mes j ;;
} .
- \,o..../ APR 2 81987 Mr. Neil P. Smith Chairman
. Seismic Qualification Utility Group 801 18th Street, N.W.
Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20006,
Dear Mr. Smith:
I have received your letter dated April 10, 1987 requesting clarification of the 60-day reporting provisions of Generic Letter 87-02. In Generic Letter
~
87-02, the staff requested that each licensee subject to the USI A-46 equipment seismic adequacy verification requirements provide a schedule for implementation of the seismic verification within 60 days of receipt of the .
Generic Letter.
In your letter you stated that licensees who belong to the Seismic Qualification Utility Group (SQUG) will be unable to provide a schedule for implementation at this time because the generic implementation procedures are
-still under development by the SQUG and will. not be finalized until the completion of s.eyeral trial plant reviews.
The staff hat / reviewed your request and concluded that it is appropriate to j
extend the 60-day reporting provisions of Generic Letter 87-02 for SQUG
- licensees until the generic implementation procedures are better defined and the trial plant reviews are completed. It is my understanding that the
{
SQUG generic implementation procedures should be essentially complete before
- October 1,1987. By that date at least two trial plant reviews will have been completed and the generic implementation procedures sufficiently defined and l reviewed by NRC staff so that licensees can plan and schedule their plant I
specific reviews.
l All licensees participating in the USI A-46 SQUG implementation program should provide the schedule for plant specific implementation no later than December 1, 1987. The NRC staff will review and evaluate the generic procedures by October 1 to allow each utility 60 days to prepare their replies to the generic letter.
Sincerely, l
Thomas E. Murley, hwr Office. of Nuclear Reactor Regulation g ib5b E d. -
.' ENCLOSURE SOUG Plants To Be Reviewed To USI A-46 Requirement This plant list was developed by determining from plant Safety Evaluation Reports whether or not a seismic qualification review has been pe'rformed using IEEE Standard 344-1975. Plants not documented as meeting the provision of IEEE Standard 344-1975 are included on the list.
- 1. Browns Ferry, Unit 1
- 2. Browns Ferry, Unit 2
- 3. Browns Ferry, Unit 3
- 4. J::;;F. ". F:ri:3, Uni's-k Arkansas .
- 5. Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1
- 6. Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 California
$7. San Onofre, Unit 1.
- 8. Rancho Seco, Unit 2 Colorado
$9. Fort St. Vrain Connecticut
- 10. Haddam Neck
- 11. Millstone, Unit 1
- 12. Millstone, Unit 2 Florida
- 13. Turkey P:i.t, Unit 3
- 14. T rkey ."eint, Unit 4
- 15. Crystal River, Unit 3
- 10. St. La-i;, Unit i Georgia
- 17. Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 1
- 18. Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2
- Plant of utility which is a member of SQUG.
1
' ' ^
- 19. Dresden, Unit 2
- 20. Dresden, Unit 3
- 21. Zion, Unit 1
- 22. Zion, Unit 2
- 23. Quad-City, Unit 1 .
- 24. Quad-City, Unit 2 Iowa
- 25. Duane Arnold, Unit 1 Maine
- 27. Calvert Cliffs, Unit 1
- 28. Calvert Cliffs, Unit 2 Massachusetts ,
- 29. Yankee Rowe
- 30. Pilgrim, Unit 1 Michigan
- 31. Big Rock Point
- 32. Palisades
- 33. Donald C. Cook, Unit 1
- 34. Donald C. Cook, Unit 2 Minnesota
- 35. Monticello
- 36. Prairie Island, Unit 1
$37. Prairie Island, Unit 2 Nebraska
- 38. Fort Calhoun, Unit 1
- 39. Cooper New Jersey
- 40. Oyster Creek, Unit 1
- 41. Salem, Unit 1
- 42. Salem, Unit 2 2
Q
a New York
- 43. Indian Point, Unit 2
- 44. Indian Point, Unit 3
- 45. Nine Mile Point, Unit 1
- 46. R. E. Ginna, Unit 1
- 47. James A. Fitzpatrick .
- 48. Brunswick, Unit 1
- 49. Brunswick, Unit 2 Ohio
$50. Davis-Besse, Unit 1 Oregon
- 51. Tr;j;n, Unit 1 Pennsylvania
- 52. Peach Bottom, Unit 2 853. Peach Bottom, Unit 3
- 4. 0;;.;c '.';11
- 3, Urit i
- 55. Three Mile Island, Unit 1 South Carolina
- 56. H. B. Robinson, Unit 2
- 57. Oconee, Unit 1
- 58. Oconee, Unit 2
- 59. Oconee, Unit 3 Tennessee i
. *60. Sequoyah, Unit 1
- 61. Sequoyah, Unit 2 l
l Vermont l *62. Vermont Yankee l
l Virginia
- 63. Surry, Unit 1
- 64. Surry, Unit 2
- *65. North Anna, Unit 1
! *66. North Anna, Unit 2 l
e i
l
.4
a o .
- 57. L;C.;;;;
- 68. Point Beach, Unit 1
- 69. Point Beach, Unit 2
- 70. Kewanee O
e t
I f
1 l
i I
t I
l 4
.0