ML20236F970
| ML20236F970 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 07/29/1987 |
| From: | Crocker L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | James O'Reilly GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236F972 | List: |
| References | |
| GL-83-28, TAC-52925, TAC-52926, TAC-53761, TAC-53762, NUDOCS 8708040079 | |
| Download: ML20236F970 (2) | |
Text
F .
am ato
- 'o g UNITED STATES 8 g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION .
g e t WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 s E
. , , , , *# JUL 2 9 1987
~
Docket Nos.: 50-321 and 50-366 Mr. James P. O'Reilly Senior Vice President - Nuclear Operation Georgia Power Company P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, Georgia 30302
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
Subject:
Safety Evaluation for Generic Letter 83-28 Items 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 (TACS 52925/52926/53761/53762)
Re: Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 By letters dated November 7,1983 and February 29, 1984, Georgia Pcwer Company provided infomation regarding its response to Items 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 of Gereric Letter 83-28. Our initial review of these responses found them to be incomplete and a Request for Additional Infomation was forwarded to GPC by NRC letter dated December 23, 1985.
By letter dated August 21,1986 (SL-1105), you supplemented your earlier-letters. You indicated that your response to Items 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 of Generic Letter 83-28 still was not complete, due to your identified need to incorporate vendor and engineering recommendations and post-maintenance testing into all plant procedures, not just safety-related procedures. You !
stated that approximately 5,000 procedures were involved and you estimated ,
i that your programs would not be complete for the mechanical and electrical i procedures until late 1986, and that it would be late 1987 before you would !
complete the remaining procedures.
In response to several telephone conversations with Region II during June 1987, you submitted an additional supplemental res four GL 83-28 items by letter dated July 1,1987 (ponse regarding SL-2709). these of Our review this letter indicated that your program regarding these items still was not complete. During an additional telephone conversation with your repre-sentative on July 7,1987, we learned that the program had slipped such ,
that the estimated date for completion of surveillance procedures is now December 1987, and for all other procedures, December 1988.
l l
We discussed the status of the review and your procedure upgrade program. l Based upon the information submitted in your letters and the discussions j during our telephone conversation, we find that your current actions re- a garding procedure roview and upgrade are acceptable. Further, in view of 1 the large number of procedures involved, we find the completion dates of ,
December 1987 and December 1988 acceptable. However, should there be l
Se M S A 8cl N !!P l e .
1-Mr. J. P. O'Reilly JUL 2 9 7987 -
further slippage in your procedure upgrade program, you should provide adequate justification for any extension of time requested.- Details re-garding our evaluation are presented in the enclosed Safety Evaluation.
We shall continue to monitor the progress of your procedure upgrade program.
However, a'; noted in the enclosed Safety Evaluation, we have concluded that your responses relating to Items 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 meet the intent of Generic Letter 83-28 and are acceptable. We therefore consider these items to be closed.
Sincerely, ,
l6k Lawrence P. Crocker, Project Manager-Project Directorate II-3 Division of Reactor Projects-I/II
Enclosure:
As stated cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION:
Docket File {
NRC PDR Local PDR PRC System PD#23 Reading MDuncan LCrocker l OGC-Bethesda ;
ACRS (10)
EJordan JPartlow Glainas SVarga MSinkule. RII TConlon, RII AHerdt, RII 1 NMerriweather, RII T!4acArthur, RII I
j '
PD#II-3/DRP-1/II PD#1J -// I/II LCrocker/mac MDun'c}'anPD#j p/DRP-I/II BJYo ood 07/A9/87 07/f//87 07 -
l
- - - _ - - - _ - - _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ -