|
---|
Category:NUREG
MONTHYEARNUREG-1437, Dfc, Supplement 62, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 62, Regarding License Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 22024-10-31031 October 2024 NUREG-1437 Dfc, Supplement 62, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 62, Regarding License Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 NUREG-1437 Volume 1, Revision 2, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Final Report2024-08-31031 August 2024 NUREG-1437, Volume 1, Revision 2, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Final Report NUREG-1437 Volume 2, Revision 2, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Final Report2024-08-31031 August 2024 NUREG-1437, Volume 2, Revision 2, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Final Report NUREG-1437 Volume 3, Revision 2, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Final Report2024-08-31031 August 2024 NUREG-1437, Volume 3, Revision 2, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Final Report NUREG-2266, Environmental Evaluation of Accident Tolerant Fuels with Increased Enrichment and Higher Burnup Levels Final Report2024-07-31031 July 2024 NUREG-2266, Environmental Evaluation of Accident Tolerant Fuels with Increased Enrichment and Higher Burnup Levels Final Report NUREG-1556 Volume 2, Rev. 1, Suppl. 1, Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses - Program-Specific Guidance About Industrial Radiography Licenses Final Report2024-05-31031 May 2024 NUREG-1556, Vol. 2, Rev. 1, Suppl. 1, Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses - Program-Specific Guidance About Industrial Radiography Licenses Final Report ML23355A1432024-01-17017 January 2024 January 17, 2024 Public Meeting Handout - Fusion Systems Rulemaking ML23303A2212023-10-31031 October 2023 NUREG/BR-0096, Revision. 2, Instructions and Guidance for Completing Physical Inventory Summary Reports - NRC Form 327 Final Report ML23123A3322023-06-0606 June 2023 SGI Pamphlet NUREG-1555, Dfc, Supp 1, Rev 2, Standard Review Plans for Environmental Reviews for Nuclear Power Plants, Supplement 1: Operating License Renewal2023-02-28028 February 2023 NUREG-1555 Dfc, Supp 1, Rev 2, Standard Review Plans for Environmental Reviews for Nuclear Power Plants, Supplement 1: Operating License Renewal NUREG-2243, Environmental Impact Statement for the Disposal of Mine Waste at the United Nuclear Corporation Mill Site in Mckinley County, New Mexico2023-01-31031 January 2023 NUREG-2243, Environmental Impact Statement for the Disposal of Mine Waste at the United Nuclear Corporation Mill Site in Mckinley County, New Mexico NUREG-2183, Supplement 1, Environmental Impact Statement Related to the Operating License for the Shine Medical Isotope Production Facility Final Report2023-01-31031 January 2023 NUREG-2183, Supplement 1, Environmental Impact Statement Related to the Operating License for the Shine Medical Isotope Production Facility Final Report ML22299A2382022-10-31031 October 2022 NUREG-2237, Supplement 1, Environmental Impact Statements for Holtec Internationals License Application for a Consolidated Interim Storage Facility for Spent Nuclear Fuel in Lea County, New Mexico NUREG-2248, Environmental Impact Statement for the License Renewal of the Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility in Richland County, South Carolina. Final Report2022-07-31031 July 2022 NUREG-2248, Environmental Impact Statement for the License Renewal of the Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility in Richland County, South Carolina. Final Report ML22181B0942022-07-31031 July 2022 NUREG-2237, Environmental Impact Statement for the Holtec International'S License Application for a Consolidated Interim Storage Facility for Spent Nuclear Fuel in Lea County, New Mexico Final Report NUREG-2159, Revision 1, Final, Acceptable Standard Format and Content for the Fundamental Nuclear Material Control Plan Required for Special Nuclear Material of Moderate Strategic Significance2022-07-29029 July 2022 NUREG-2159, Revision 1, Final, Acceptable Standard Format and Content for the Fundamental Nuclear Material Control Plan Required for Special Nuclear Material of Moderate Strategic Significance ML22175A2022022-06-30030 June 2022 NUREG/BR-0058, Rev. 5, Appendix K Monetary Valuation of Nonfatal Cancer Risk for Use in Cost-Benefit Analysis Dfc ML22175A2032022-06-30030 June 2022 NUREG/BR-0058 Dfc, Rev. 5, Appendix L Replacement Energy Costs NUREG-2155, Rev 2, Implementation Guidance for 10 CFR Part 37, Physical Protection of Category 1 and Category 2 Quantities of Radioactive Material2022-03-31031 March 2022 NUREG-2155, Rev 2, Implementation Guidance for 10 CFR Part 37, Physical Protection of Category 1 and Category 2 Quantities of Radioactive Material ML22042A1162022-02-0909 February 2022 Document to Support ACRS Subcommittee Meeting Draft NUREG 1021, Rev 13, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors ML21209A9552021-07-31031 July 2021 NUREG-2239, Environmental Impact Statement for Interim Storage Partners Llc'S License Application for a Consolidated Interim Storage Facility for Spent Nuclear Fuel in Andrews County, Texas Final Report ML21096A2922021-04-30030 April 2021 NUREG/BR-0058, Rev. 5, Appendix F Data Sources - Dfc ML21096A2932021-04-30030 April 2021 NUREG/BR-0058, Rev. 5, Appendix G Regulatory Analysis Methods and Data for Nuclear Facilities Other than Power Reactors - Dfc ML21096A2942021-04-30030 April 2021 NUREG/BR-0058, Rev. 5, Appendix H Severe Accident Risk Analysis - Dfc ML21096A2952021-04-30030 April 2021 NUREG/BR-0058, Rev. 5, Appendix I National Environmental Policy Act Cost-Benefit Analysis - Dfc ML21005A1532020-12-31031 December 2020 NUREG/BR-0520, State Programs at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NUREG-2242, Replacement Energy Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Plants: 2020-2030 - Draft for Comment2020-12-31031 December 2020 NUREG-2242, Replacement Energy Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Plants: 2020-2030 - Draft for Comment NUREG-1556 Volume 20, Rev. 1, Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses: Guidance About Administrative Licensing Procedures Final Report2020-11-30030 November 2020 NUREG-1556, Vol. 20, Rev. 1, Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses: Guidance About Administrative Licensing Procedures Final Report NUREG-2224, Dry Storage and Transportation of High Burnup Spent Fuel2020-11-30030 November 2020 NUREG-2224, Dry Storage and Transportation of High Burnup Spent Fuel NUREG-2216, Review Plan for Transportation Packages for Spent Fuel and Radioactive Material2020-08-31031 August 2020 NUREG-2216 Review Plan for Transportation Packages for Spent Fuel and Radioactive Material NUREG-1507, Rev. 1, Minimum Detectable Concentrations with Typical Survey Instruments for Various Contaminants and Field Conditions2020-08-31031 August 2020 NUREG-1507, Rev. 1, Minimum Detectable Concentrations with Typical Survey Instruments for Various Contaminants and Field Conditions ML20178A4332020-06-30030 June 2020 NUREG-BR-0204,Revision 3, Instructions for Completing the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission'S Uniform Low-Level Radioactive Waste Manifest - Final Report ML20122A2202020-05-31031 May 2020 NUREG-2239 Dfc, Environmental Impact Statement for Interim Storage Partners Llc'S License Application for a Consolidated Interim Storage Facility for Spent Nuclear Fuel in Andrews County, Texas ML20321A0972020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 3 - Principal Design Criteria Evaluation NUREG-2215, Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities. Title, Table of Contents, Introduction2020-04-30030 April 2020 NUREG-2215, Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities. Title, Table of Contents, Introduction ML20321A0982020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 4 - Structural Evaluation ML20321A0992020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 5 - Thermal Evaluation ML20321A1002020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 6 - Shielding Evaluation ML20321A1012020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 7 - Criticality Evaluation ML20321A1022020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 8 - Materials Evaluation ML20321A1122020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 17 - Technical Specifications Evaluation ML20321A1112020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 16 - Accident Analysis Evaluation ML20321A1102020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 15 - Quality Assurance Evaluation ML20321A1092020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 14 - Decommissioning Evaluation (SL) ML20321A1082020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 13 - Waste Management Evaluation (SL) ML20321A1072020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 12 - Conduct of Operations Evaluation ML20321A1062020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 11 - Operation Procedures and Systems Evaluation ML20321A1052020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 10B - Radiation Protection Evaluation for Dry Storage Systems (CoC) ML20321A1042020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 10A - Radiation Protection Evaluation for Dry Storage Facilities (SL) ML20321A0962020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 2 - Site Characteristics Evaluation for Dry Storage Facilities (SL) 2024-08-31
[Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". Category:Standard Review Plan
MONTHYEARML22041A3752022-02-0909 February 2022 Document to Support ACRS Subcommitee Meeting - Redline Standard Review Plan 1.0 Introduction and Interfaces ML22041A4442022-02-0909 February 2022 Document to Support ACRS Subcommittee Meeting - Redline Standard Review Plan 13.3 Emergency Planning ML22041A4462022-02-0909 February 2022 Document to Support ACRS Subcommittee Meeting - Redline Standard Review Plan 13.6.1 Physical Security-Combined License and Operating Reactors ML22041A4562022-02-0909 February 2022 Document to Support ACRS Subcommittee Meeting - Redline Standard Review Plan 13.6.4 Access Authorization - Operational Program ML22041A5272022-02-0909 February 2022 Document to Support ACRS Subcommittee Meeting Redline Standard Review Plan 19.0 Probablistic Risk Assessment and Accident Evaluation for New Reactors ML22041A5322022-02-0909 February 2022 Document to Support ACRS Subcommittee Meeting Redline Standard Review Plan 19.1 Determining the Technical Adequacy of Probablistic Risk Assessment for Risk-Informed License Amendment Requests After Initial Fuel Load ML20321A0932020-04-30030 April 2020 Appendix 8B - Fuel Cladding Creep ML20321A0912020-04-30030 April 2020 Appendix 7A - Technical Recommendations for the Criticality Safety Review of PWR Transportation Packages and Storage Casks ML20321A0952020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 1 - General Information for Evaluation ML20321A0962020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 2 - Site Characteristics Evaluation for Dry Storage Facilities (SL) ML20321A0972020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 3 - Principal Design Criteria Evaluation ML20321A0982020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 4 - Structural Evaluation ML20321A0992020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 5 - Thermal Evaluation ML20321A1002020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 6 - Shielding Evaluation ML20321A1012020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 7 - Criticality Evaluation ML20321A1022020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 8 - Materials Evaluation ML20321A1042020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 10A - Radiation Protection Evaluation for Dry Storage Facilities (SL) ML20321A1052020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 10B - Radiation Protection Evaluation for Dry Storage Systems (CoC) ML20321A1062020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 11 - Operation Procedures and Systems Evaluation ML20321A1072020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 12 - Conduct of Operations Evaluation ML20321A1082020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 13 - Waste Management Evaluation (SL) ML20321A1092020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 14 - Decommissioning Evaluation (SL) ML20321A1102020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 15 - Quality Assurance Evaluation ML20321A1112020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 16 - Accident Analysis Evaluation ML20321A1122020-04-30030 April 2020 Chapter 17 - Technical Specifications Evaluation ML20321A0882020-04-30030 April 2020 Appendix a - Interim Staff Guidance (ISG) Incorporated Into NUREG-2215 ML20321A0892020-04-30030 April 2020 Appendix 4A - Computational Modeling Software Technical Review Guidance ML20321A0902020-04-30030 April 2020 Appendix 4B - Pool and Pool Confinement Facilities ML20321A0922020-04-30030 April 2020 Appendix 8A - Clarifications, Guidance, and Expectations to ASTM Standard Practice C1671-15 ML20321A0942020-04-30030 April 2020 Appendix 8C - Fuel Oxidation and Cladding Splitting ML20321A1032020-04-0101 April 2020 Chapter 9 - Confinement Evaluation 2022-02-09
[Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". |
Text
APPENDIX 8C FUEL OXIDATION AND CLADDING SPLITTING Irradiated uranium dioxide (UO2) exposed to an oxidizing atmosphere will eventually oxidize to triuranium octoxide (U3O8). The time it takes to oxidize is a function of burnup and temperature.
At temperatures during dry storage system (DSS) fuel loading operations, this reaction can occur within a matter of hours.
The grain boundaries of irradiated fuel are highly populated with voids and gas bubbles. Initially, the grain boundaries are oxidized to U4O9, resulting in a slight matrix shrinkage and further opening of the pellet structure. Oxidation then proceeds into the grain until there is complete transformation of the grains to U4O9 (Einziger et al. 1992). The grains remain in this phase for a temperature-dependent duration until the fuel resumes oxidizing to the U3O8 state. The transformation to U3O8 occurs with about 33-percent lattice expansion that breaks the ceramic fragment structure into grain-sized particles. At higher temperatures, these two transformations occur so rapidly that they are difficult to distinguish. The mechanism of oxidation in irradiated fuel appears to be different than in unirradiated fuel where U3O7 is formed and oxidation proceeds from the fragment surface and not down the grain boundaries. This mechanistic change occurs between about 10 and 30 gigawatt days per metric ton of uranium (GWd/MTU).
When the UO2 is in the form of a fuel rod, the expansion of the fuel when it transforms to U3O8 induces a circumferential stress in the cladding. Because of the swelling of the fuel, the process is usually initially localized to the original cladding crack site. The cladding strains because of this stress range from 2 to 6 percent before the initial crack starts to propagate along the rod. The incubation time to initiate the propagation and the rate of propagation have an Arrhenius temperature dependence. Axial propagation, spiral propagation, and a combination of the modes that result in splitting have been observed in pressurized-water reactor (PWR) rods (Einziger and Strain 1986).
The database for oxidation was developed mostly in the 1980s in the United States, Canada, England, and Germany. The data usually appear in four forms: (1) O/M ratio (ratio of oxygen to metal content of the oxide) versus time, (2) time to the UO2.4 plateau versus time, (3) cladding splitting incubation versus time, and (4) cladding splitting rate versus time. Japanese researchers performed some later work on the effects of oxygen depletion (Nakamura 1995). French researchers are also working on similar questions (Ferry et al. 2005). Work on cladding splitting was done in the early 1980s by researchers in the United States (Einziger and Cook 1984; Einziger and Strain 1986; Johnson et al. 1984) and Canada (Novak and Hastings 1984; Boase and Vandergraaf 1977) and is limited. The Department of Energy (DOE) (Bechtel 2005) has issued an analysis of the oxidation issue in relationship to the handling of potentially breached fuel in a proposed handling facility at a repository. This analysis depends on variables such as the gap between the fuel and the cladding, and burnup in a manner that is currently under technical review. In total, this research has shown that there are a number of variables that can affect the rates at which the fuel oxidizes and the cladding splits: burnup, moisture content of the air, cladding material, and type of initial defect.
The DOE developed a model for fuel oxidation and cladding splitting (Bechtel 2005) for use during long durations at a disposal facility that tries to account for the fuel-to-cladding gap and burnup of the fuel. The gap is the as-measured cold gap and does not account for the closing of the gap as a result of differential thermal expansion of the cladding and fuel material, which could be calculated. There are inadequate data to verify the correctness of the DOE model. Plots in Einziger and Strain (1986) present actual data and comparisons with the data taken by other 8C-1
researchers at 30 GWd/MTU. The measurements of splitting implicitly account for the gap closure. However, no burnup effects can be inferred from these data.
No oxidation or cladding splitting studies have been conducted on fuel with burnup greater than 45 GWd/MTU. Data between 30 and 45 GWd/MTU show a decrease in the oxidation rate as a result of the presence of certain actinides and fission products that are burned into the fuel. There is no reason that this should not continue at higher burnups, but the strength of the effect may change with burnup. Higher burnup fuel (greater than 55 GWd/MTU) forms an external rim on the pellets that consists of very fine grains (1 micron). As indicated earlier, the oxidation process is a grain boundary effect. The fuel pellet should be divided into two regions for the purpose of oxidation analysis: the center of the pellet where the grains have grown slightly, and the rim.
While the rate of the oxidation may decrease with burnup, the total amount of fuel that is oxidized may increase because of a much greater intergranular surface area in the rim region. The DOE model (Bechtel 2005) uses a linear decrease in oxidation with burnup, but this has not been substantiated as of yet. A burnup effect is supported by Hansons analysis (Hanson 1998) of Einziger and Cooks data (1984) from the NRC whole-rod tests, in which defect propagation was observed to occur earlier at the defects at the lower end of the rod where the burnup was lower.
Studies using a low partial pressure of water vapor in air have not shown any dependence of the oxidation rate on the moisture content of the air (Ferry et al. 2005). On the other hand, some studies have shown a large increase in the oxidation rate when the moisture content is above 50 percent of the dew point. Oxidation in a 100-percent steam atmosphere is a different process.
Studies also indicate that the oxidation rate will decrease if the oxygen content in the atmosphere drops into the range of a few torr or less (Nakamura 1995). It does not appear that there is an effect of oxygen content at higher oxygen levels, but the data are sparse.
With few exceptions, oxidation studies on fuel have been conducted on light-water reactor fuel (Einziger and Strain 1986; Johnson et al. 1984). However, the UO2 matrix is essentially the same in both PWR and boiling-water reactor (BWR) fuel. At the higher burnups, oxidation behavior may vary slightly as the actinide and fission product burn-in varies. The effect of the process on the splitting of the cladding may vary considerably because of the difference in gap size between the cladding types, and the thicker cladding in BWR rods.
Limited cladding splitting studies have been conducted on Zircaloy-clad PWR (Einziger and Cook 1984; Einziger and Strain 1986; Johnson et al. 1984) and Canada Deuterium Uranium (CANDU) fuel. Defects were put in the fuel either by a stress-corrosion cracking process producing small, sharp holes, more typical of those found in reactor-initiated stress-corrosion cracking, and by drilling, which produced a larger, duller hole. Most of the defects used in the studies were of the latter type. No measurements were made in cladding above 30 GWd/MTU.
Very few data points were measured to determine the splitting rate; therefore, the time to start splitting has to be determined by interpolation. As a result, there is large uncertainty in both measurements. Further, the splitting of other alloy types (e.g., ZIRLO', M5) or at higher burnups should be assessed per the design-bases fuel contents. Fuel oxidation would introduce uncertainties for fuel performance and fuel retrievability.
8C-2
References Bechtel, Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel Handling in Air Study, 000-30R-MGR0-00700-000000, March 2005.
Boase, D.G. and T.T. Vandergraaf, The Canadian Spent Fuel Storage Canister: Some Materials Aspects, Nuclear Technology, Vol. 32, pp. 60-71, 1977.
Einziger, R.E., and J.A. Cook, LWR Spent Fuel Dry Storage Behavior at 229 °C, HEDLTME 84-17, NUREG/CR-3708, Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory, August 1984.
Einziger, R.E., and R.V. Strain, Oxidation of Spent Fuel at Between 250° and 360°C, Electric Power Research Institute Report NP-4524, 1986.
Einziger, R.E., L.E. Thomas, H.V. Buchanan, and R.B. Stout, Oxidation of Spent Fuel in Air at 175 to 195 °C, J. Nucl. Mater., Vol. 190, p. 53, 1992.
Einziger, R.E., S. D. Atkin, D. E. Stellbrecht, and V. Pasupathi, High Temperature Postirradiation Materials Performance of Spent Pressurized Water Reactor Fuel Rods Under Dry Storage Conditions. Nuclear Technology, Vol. 57, p. 65. 1982.
Ferry, C, C. Poinssot, P. Lovera, A. Poulesquen, V. Broudic, C. Cappelaere, L. Desgranges, P. Garcia, C. Jegou, D. Roudil, P. Marimbeau, J. Gras, and P. Bouffioux, Synthesis on the Spent Fuel Long Term Evolution, Rapport CEA-R6084, 2005.
Hanson, B.D., The Burnup Dependence of Light Water Reactor Spent Fuel Oxidation, PNNL-11929, Richland, Washington, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, TIC: 238459, 1998.
Johnson, A.B., E.R. Gilbert, D. Stahl, V. Pasupathi, and R. Kohli, Exposure of Breached BWR Fuel Rods at 325 °C to Air and Argon, Proc. NRC Workshop on Spent Fuel/Cladding Reaction During Dry Storage, Gaithersburg, Maryland, August 1983, NUREG/CR-0049, D.
Reisenweaver, Ed., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1984.
Nakamura, J., T. Otomo, T. Kikuchi, and S. Kawasaki, Oxidation of Fuel Rods under Dry Storage Condition, J Nuc. Sci. Tech., Vol. 32, No. 4, p. 321, April 1995.
Novak, J., and I.J. Hastings, Post-Irradiation Behavior of Defected UO2 in Air at 220-250 °C, Proc. NRC Workshop on Spent Fuel/Cladding Reaction During Dry Storage, Gaithersburg, Maryland, August 1983, NUREG/CR-0049, D. Reisenweaver, Ed., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1984 8C-3