ML20128Q237

From kanterella
Revision as of 07:50, 7 July 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs Commission of Results of Reactor Operator & Senior Reactor Operator Licensing & Requalification Exams for Second Quarter FY84
ML20128Q237
Person / Time
Issue date: 05/23/1984
From: Dircks W
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To:
Shared Package
ML20128Q169 List:
References
FOIA-85-150, TASK-IR, TASK-SE SECY-84-081A, SECY-84-81A, NUDOCS 8507130396
Download: ML20128Q237 (25)


Text

4 INFORMATION REPORT Mav 23, 1984 SECY-84-814 For: The Comissioners From: William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations

Subject:

RESULTS OF OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATIONS AND REQUALIFICATION EXAMINATIONS FOR SECOND QUARTER FY 1984

Purpose:

To infom the Comissioners of examination and licensing activities for Reactor Operators and Senior Reactor Operators, including requalification examination results.

Discussion: The enclosed tables report licensing action results, including issuances, denials or withdrawals and pass / fail rate for each NRC licensing examination component. The results are presented as a combined total and broken down by region. We have also included a graph summarizing the examination results by region for this quarter. It shows the percentage pass rate by license and exam type and the total number of exams given broken down by region. We continue to see variations in the percentages in

. the individual categories of the Regions; however, these variations reflect the impact on small sample sizes when one test administration results in a large failure rate. We are continuing to track trends in examination results by region l and have not identified statistically significant trends that i

are not explained.

I Also included are tables showing the results of the I requalification examinations given for the second quarter FY 1984. All completed requalification examinations were evaluated as satisfactory with the exception of Ginna (RI) and Trojan (RV). Regions I and V are completing follow-up I audits and actions prior to final program evaluations. As noted l

Contact:

Don H. Beckham, NRR X24868 0507130396 850528 l PDR FOIA HUDGINS85-150 PDR 3

The Commissioners in the last quarterly report, Region III continues to evaluate the Prairie Island requalification program. When the final audit reports are completed, they will be sunnarized in a future quarterly report. e William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations

Enclosures:

1. Operator Licensing Tracking System Quarterly StatusReport(ExaminationResultsand Licensing Actions) - Total (All Regions) 4 for Second Quarter FY 1984.
2. Operator Licensing Tracking System Quarterly Status Report (Examination Results and Licensing Actions) for Regions I through Y i for Second Quarter FY 1984. '
3. Graph of Exam Results - Percentage Pass vs.

Exam Type - Second Quarter FY 1984.

4. Requalification Examination Results for Regions I through Region V for Second Quarter FY 1984.

t I

... - - -_ __ _ . - - - _ _ = -. ,-- . . - .

a __ _,m .._ - _ _ _. u _m*,m..,.-. m Am_. _ _ sum-, A a ,_ _ . , . .__

D e. g , gg ' e 46 e e t 6 e

4 9

e b

ENCIDSURE 1 O

G s

1 - -

.......c .

10BL i

Q-1236315 OPERAIOR LICEZ5tMG IRACKING SYSIErt (AIJ. EIG6)

DATE 95/02/84 ACTIVITY STA1US REPORT 2ml Qtr IY 84 ,

01/98/84 THROUGH 93/31/84 i

EXAMINATION RLSULTS

~~

GRAL SIrtut ATOR TOTAL WRITIEN BFA55 9 FAIL OFA55 9 FAIL OPA53 8 FAIL LAKE 3 79 / 18 23 / l 93 IMITIAL - RO 77 / 15 4.2%

83.7X / 16.3% 88.83 / II.2X 95.8% /

67 / 7 23 / 4 76 SRO 65 / 8 89.9% / 18.0% 90.5% / 9.5x 85.22 / 14.8%

9 / I I / 3 23 CEArrLICATIONS - RS 17 / 2 8.8%

89.54 / 10.5% 99.8% / 10.0% 108.0% /

ft / 2 2 / 8 28

  • SRO 14 / 0 4.0%

199.9% / 3.9% 83.34 / 16.7X 103.0% /

28 / 3 5 / 9 36 UFGRADE - SRO 25 / ff 8.9%

69.4X / 30.6% ,

99.3% / 9.72 100.0% /

Sag. / ti 24 / I 116 TOTAL - RO 94 / 17 96.9% / 4.9%

84.7% / 15.3% 8$.9X / 11.12 38 / 4 f33

SRO 104 / 19 195 / 12 84.42 / 15.4% 89.7X / It.3X 88.2% / 88.8%

I

! 4

+

1 i

i t l .

I b

- TUTAL OrERATOR LICEMSIMG TRACKING SYST[M (ALL REGIONS)

R-1236315 II A T E : 95/02/34 ACTIVIIY STAI55 RErdRI L3] Qtr I;Y 84 09/98/84 iMROUGil 93/31/84 LICENSING ACTIONS OISSUED ODENIED 9WI T HDR AWN IMITIAL - RO - 122 42 14 -

SRO - 199 17 18 INST CERI - 39 12 6 LTD SRO - 9 9 e REAPPLICATIONS - RO - 15 7 I SRO - 26 2 2 INST CERI - 3 2 9 LID SRO - 9 8 e

, UPGRADE - SRO - 32 8 3 TOTAL - -

RO - 837 g. 49 15 j SRO - 167 27 16 INST CERI - 42 14 6 LTD SRO - t 0 0 REMEWAL - RO - 134 I O SRO - 286 9 I 9

IMST CERI - 0 0 8 LTD SRO - 0 0 0 f

1 G

  • q 9

ee e

6 4

e 9

i 9

ENCIDSURE 2

. S 6

s o

I i

l i

t I e I

l l

t e

I I

i L

Enclosura 2 Region 1 R-1236315 OPERATOR LICENSIMO TRACKING SYsitet DATE 05/02/84 ACTIVIIY STAIUS REPORI DI N I N 9t/S1/84 IHROUGH 03/3t/84 EXM11 NATION RESULTS I

SIrtULAIOR TOTAL l

WRITIEN ORAL IFAIL IPA 55 OFAIL TAKEH BPASS 9 FAIL SPASS j

4 8 / 9 35 29 / 5 28 /

! - INITIAL - RO 87.5% / 12.5% 0.8% / e.ex

' 85.3% / 14.7% 9 / 2 9 / I .f2 SRO 19 / 2 S.0X /f88.8%

83.3% / 16.7X St.8% / 18.24

, 1 I / 9 1 / 8 9 / 9 l REAPPLICATIONS - RO 100.02 / 8.9% 0.9% / 3.9%

190.9% / 9.94 9 9'/ 9 1 O / 9 8 /

  • SRO ISS.tX / 0.9% 0.0% / S.8%

. 8.0X / 9.0X 3 / 8 9 6 / 3 5 / 1 i UrGRADE - SRO -

43.3% / 16.7X 109.8% / O.0%

i 64.72 / 33.3X 8 / 9 36 TOTAL - RO 30 / 5 2W / 4 3.8%

i 87.1% / 12.1% 0.0% /

85.7% / 14.3% 3 / 8 22 96 / 5 15 / 3 SRO 76.2X / 23.82 83.3% / 16.7% 75.9% / 25.8%

l l

i i

i 4

i I

DFECATOR LICEMSIMO ICACKING SYSTEM Region !

R-1236315 DATES 95/02/a4 ACTIVI1Y STAIUS REPORT et/es/a5 inRousn e3/3t/ag 2nd Qtr FY 84 LICINSING MT, IONS SISSUED ODENIED SWITMDR AWN RO - 51 11- 6 IMITIAL -

SRO - 21 4 1 4 2 8 IMST CERT - 0 LIC SRO - 0 0 RO - 9 1 9 REAPPLICATIDMS - 8 8 SRO - 1 INST CERT - 0 0 0 LTD 3R0 - 0 9 8 SRO - 9 5 8 UFORADE -

RO - 58 12 6 TOTAL -

SRO - 38 g. 9 I INST CERI - 4, 2 9 9 8 LTD SRO - 9 RO - 35 1 0 I REMEWAL -

  • f 2

SRO - 69 O S

i INST CERI - G S 8

LTD SRO - O 8 e

~

i e ,.

w e

be C e.e O Cf wE FQ E N Ew WW N e N =

o e e N M N N 04 s= >

)

l l

)

I e4 MM MM M MM

==

ar e *= M. N e. e m. m e. e e.

  • M. N e.

On as e e e e og e

== e e 4

ed  %%%% %%%% %% %%%%

me an MM MM M MM en e =.

. N. M e. s e. e m. m e. w e=. M e.

=

4 = e e e e == e 4 e e e e i e

w em e

en e ES O a- g M MM E at ** MM MM e=e O M M t e. Ne== e s. e e. m e. f e.N . an.

he b % m m e e D P UWM .H

=2

= se

due ad M

>ME 4 eg

%%%% %%%% %% *%%%% = ,

30 MM MM M ** M Y Ow3 O E40 2 g

em en m o.d a= . e. s o. m e. M e. >= e..m. an.

e-s=m=g as s= m e e e " en e en en =. me e e

  • E s= b e e =

W )= eg u e= e s=e me se .

I w>%

sw ==

at n= e Ou%

e- 4 ==

4 e at .

W b

O MM MM M MM e N. = e. G e. e s. N e. e N. M e.

e an e e e e M en g m a=

W

>=  %%%% %%%% %% %%%%

a=

ese MM MM M MM w e n eem a= N e. m e. m e. N o. e nem em k e.

3 =

  • e e e = e

. m @ m e e e

OO OO O O O at og as er at K ag en en en e i l i I e .a en W f e 4 3 O 4 we 4 >

N t= O.e e

t==

W 9

D

>=

e me en \ E 4 b *

== en em u 3

  • Me eo e .a sn b NW b ag e= s=

I4 W e aC EO . .


,-e s w-a ---, ,

_ _ -4 . - - , , ,- - - -

OPE ATOR LICENSING 12ACKING SYSIErs Region II R-1236315 ACTIVITY STAIUS CEPORI DAIE8 95/92/34

~

91/05/84 1HROUGH 93/31/34 N IT N I LICINSING ACTIONS

)

DISSUED #DEMIED LWITHDRAWM

~~

  1. ~ ~

i IMITIAL - RS - 27 2 2 t

SRO - 21 3 1 INST CERT - 12 0 1 LTD SRO - 0 O 8 i REAPPLICATIONS - RO - 3 0 0 SRO - 0 0 0 1MST CERT - 0 0 9 '

LTD SRO - O e e i

UFORADE - SRO - 9 1 1 1 10TAL - "

RO - 39 2 2 SRO - 30 4 2 INST CERI - 12 O 1 i LTD SRS - 8 8 9

)

. g.

s REMENAL . RS - 32 0 e i SRS - 100 0 0 INST CERT - O O 8 LTD SRS - 8 ,

e e 1

i l

I i .

I I

t a

e , e

a 1

on !!!

'R-1236315 OPE AIOR LICENSING IRACKING SYS1[ft DATES 95/02/84 ACTIVITY STATUS REPORT 2ml Qtr IT 84 01/0t/84 1HROUGH 93/3t/84 i

j IDUNIMTION RESUL13 l

l I -

ORAL $IrtUL A TOR 10TAL WRITTEN eFAIL TAKEN OFAIL GPA55 OFAIL BPASS 9 PASS ,

! 8 / 9 19 IS / 3 17 / 2 INITIAL - RO 89.5X / 10.5% 190.0% / 8.8%

94.7X / 5.3% 2e / I 32 SRO 29 / 3 31 / 1 96.9% / 3.1% 15.2% / 4.8%

99.6% / 9.4X .

t / 8 8 7 / 9 4 / 0 CEAPPLICATISMS - RO 5.0% 100.0% / 9.0% 100.0% / 9.9% ~

100.04 / 2 / 9 19 SRO 7 / 9 6 / 1 S.04 85.7X / 14.3% 100.0% / 8.0%

190.0X /

2 / 9 6 UFORADE - SRO 4 / 2 5 / 9 O.8% 108.02 / 3.8%

66.7X / 33.3% 109. 0{. /

'21' / 2 9 / 9 27 TOTAL - RO 25 / 1 109.8% / 8.84 96.2X / 3.8% 91.3% / S.7% I 48 40 / 5 42 / 2 24 /

SRO 96.8% / 4.8%

88.92 / 11.1X 95.52 / 4.52 f

l I

E 1

e p e

t R-1236315 DPE!ATOR LICECSING IRECKING SYS1[t1

-DAIEs 95/02/84 AC1IVIlY SIAIUS REPORT 2sul Qtr IT 8l

91/91/84 IIIR0tfGH 93/3 8/84 LICINSING ACTIONS SISSUED ODENIED eWITHDRAlgt INITIAL - R9 - 27 18 1 SRO - 44 19 2 INSI CERI - 14 S 4 LID SRG - 9 9 9 REAPPLICATIONS - Re - 19 5 1 SRO - 29 2 2 INST CERI - 3 2 9 LTD SRS - 9 9 9 UPGRADE - SRS - 12 1 2 TOTAL - Re - 37 23 2 SRO - 76 13 6 INST CERT - 17 7 4 w LTD SRS - 9, 9 0 n'

s REMEMAL - RS - 48 9 9 SRS - $3 0 0 INSI CERT - 9 9 9 LTD SR9 - 9 ,

9 9 3

~

i t

i I

  • a

,9 g, - .

. 1 .

I g / s we CC i ,,

- .\.s s

+

p .

}' ' iq g s

6 i

i t i

g C e Cr , -\' ,

\- ..

.o@ d

~

.  ; U-y, 4W m e m an e e ao sh CJ =

,* 'w l = ==

  • N N M '

Q: N _A,,

. 'j ,

  • o .a,ic -

s

. q ,

j w m ..

4 h - a 3  % .#

s, y .- ,

t ,

a t

'I .\

s

.) i

.(

t s ,t g '. -

. g Q- ..

MM J M N M MM A 4y . Eg

== c. o. s e ., ,,es a. rs e. o e. e m. e o.

I 6 ,9 Mi ~e o e e e

, .C e. '

g i ,

g ,

=J NN%.\' N\\\ \\ \ 'O \ \

' "rJ " , .

me M M N x M pe M M- M e

'q s.e e. e e. e e. g= e. e e.

are

, , ,4 e e, e a n- e, e e

i \ e s

  • 5 L '* s ,

s I

l E

l w w_ .

ese gn ,gs ..

+

an 1

, 43 ,s

$ '[, ) '

  • dM ~. a Me. MM M MM M m,,

m .e .

- e .e.m.

m e. N ..

  • N.

vggW M, '

s

. '. yM N ** ** =

g eA -

.pg= 4 \\\\ \\\\ +\\ \\\\ .

E 30

  • O 4

MM MM 35. - M M o ,. 3 G ECO # '==# ". " *.. **"* . == "* . e 8. "N#.

,,g =

g M e e e en e **

g ~. # e e* e PW g ,. H h

,Ww , s.

i hp >= f e.e M @ + ~

\

  • .J 3..5, a , s. ,

'.T gwe ( \ '

Ous5 p ag e A 4 e M ~

W ,

C,. $

-4 O

d- MM MM MM an e.e e= m.

== e. ep e. e. M 7; ,g ,

e= s\ f N. e m. e.

e N c e en e rh

-E N We == M N m

& W

  • =

\\\\ \\\\ \\ \\\\

4 M MM MM M MM M en

+ $

s. *H

= = .m m. m e. N o. M

== e. s e.

N N e N.

N e e en e e

1. 't e T' 3 en 4 De em ed e a w. ec , e

==

  • . . )

. s .s 1

1

  • s .

k Y

>\ .

3

\

s s . ,^

5 , O O O O O O O

' ~ K E E w M DC E W @ en m f -/* J B

.a en W .,a

  • +s. (

e o ~ eC E G et g O 4 >

g gg

    • y '

M

  • .M St 4 O s ,- M > c' >=

E 4 L p

e. ,n

- M w = .

eid g C.

n ..%, %' b NW e

.. < W NO l, e -

,c .

i .

v Region IV iR-1236315 DPERATOR LICENSIMO TRACKlHG SYSTEM

  • DAT E8 95/02/84 Aci!VITY STATUS GEPORI 2nd Qtr FY 84 91/01/84 illROUGil 03/31/84 LICENSING ACTIONS i

I s BISSUED ODEMIED OWITHDRAWN IMITIAL - RO - 5 0 5 SRO - 7- 0 3 INST CERT - 2 1 0 i

' LTD SRO - 0 0 0 REAPPLICATIONS - RO - 2 8 9 SRO - 4 0 0 INST CERT - 0 0 8 LTD SRO - 0 0 0 UPGRADE - SRO - 9 1 0 TOTAL - RO - 7 1 5 SRO - 11 1 3 INST CERT - 2 I O LTD SRO - O 9 0 g.

i 8 i REMENAL - RO - 7 0 0 SRO - 29 9 0 INST CERI - 9 8 8 LTD SRO - 0 0 0 .

l.

l t

I. .

O g $

- . I

_ \

l 9 1 co W

~

6 C a

=

O Cf aE g] 4W e e

  • m o m
  • Nw CE N 04 p= s-MM MM M MM se g . e m. m e. m e. s e. . e s. s e.

O e e e e e .e e

' ese 4

w \\\% \\\\ \\ %\\%

D E MM MM M MM mean arm e e m. m e. s e. e m. m e. e m. m e.

4 e e e e e e e L e e e =. e E

W s=

en an e a0 c e= %

E at

  • MM MM M MM

==e m m en hC L % p s o. m e. m o.m e. m e. m e. == e. - -

uwm a e e e e e e e d eC e e N 2C .ma =

    • 4e E .* 4 \\\\ \\\\ \\ = \\\\

30 C *= D et D MM MM W* M M ECO me >= g g e s. t e. e m. m e. m e. f e.c e.

en an E _ e e e e e e e E >= m. e e 80 W> . e= s=

U >= e ese one e

=J > %

a=o ==

ate = m OU% '

>= 4 ==

4 e g

W .

b O

MM MM M MM

  • M e. e s.
  • e. m e. m e. f e. e m.

an e e e e e e E P. O e W ==

> \\\\ \\\\ \\ \\\\ =

a=e MM MM M MM et 3

  • e. c e. m e. an s. m e. == e. m e.

an e e e e e e

. N O e N e e= a= ==

O O O O O O O et et et et at et et en en M en i I I I e .,o e W -e

  1. 4 E O 4

% e=e O 4 >

N > me et O e ese e- O >

an % E 4 b -

a= an s=e U 3 en e s=e to d M b NW b

  • = s= 4 14 W =

OC O E

2 I1 t-1236315 OPERATOR LICENSING 1RACKIllG SYSTEN Region V 1 ATE: 05/02/84 ACTIVI M STATUS REPORI  ;

, 91/01/84 THROUGil 03/31/84 2 xl Qtr IY 84 LICINSING ACr10NS GISSUED SDEMIED BWITHDRAWlj INITIAL - RO - 12 II O ,.

1 5RO - 16 8 4 IHST CERT - 3 9 1 LTD SRO - 9 O 8 REAPPLICATIONS - RO - t 9 0 9 i SRO.- 1 0 i INST CERT - O O 9 LTD SRO - 0 0 0 j UPGRADE - SRO - t 0 0 TOTAL - RO - 12 11 0 SRO - 18 8 4 INST CERT - 3 8 1 i LTD SRO - S, 8 8 l

i n' I

, REMEWAL - RO - 19 0 9 i SRO - 44 9 8 1 INST CERT - O 9 0 LID SRO - 0 8 8 l .

i i

i j .

i 1 -

?

i I

i

' I

m g, me -=- * +- .m.e %, m .- w =.

9

=9 9

e 6

8 e ENCIOSURE 3 .

1 i

i a

i I

l l

i l

1 1

t I

e 1

  • ^

i 8

5 _ si m 1555555555555 5 $ _ ~

3[

h 111111111111111111111111111111111 5g lg ,5$

i a ea .

E E b! g El E555555555555 5 E tv 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 Ewg ji

~ s 5 .- es ,

8 8 8 3 2 l

N'E g 1555555555555 5 55555555555 G_m8 g

111llllllllllll1lll11llllllllllllll j*_ lllllllllll[jjjgglj;j;;;;;;;;gg;jgggggll g y"c.

mi e

- EE -

N E g

Emi 155555555551 ga 55555555555551 E E2s lllllllij E ,

O gg lillllllllllllllllllllllllllllll' S ,

se s 2 8 8 8 2

.. g" g a 3 .  !

z e 15E5555555E1 3g 5555555555E Es 11111ll111111111111111111111 E"- lllllllllllllllillllllll I -

E

~

s g S S h 8 8 155555555555 5 EEEEEEEEEEEEi g 11111111111111111111111111111111115 11111111111111111111111111 2 g E S 3 2 8 s S 3 -

N m '\

'~**===*me -e, .

y ,,--6 7------%-. .-__.-,-,,yp . - - - . - -

@M & .We e- m @ w 4 & Qee m . F ,

d D

9 4

4

)

ENCIDSURE 4 O

e W

O

>h

_ .. _ . ~ . .. .

ENCLOSURE 4 REQUALIFICATION EXAMINATIONS Second Quarter FY 1984 Region I Facility Results Ginna Unsatisfactory. Utility has implemented a program to upgrade their requalification program. Region I is following this closely and will report the results when the requalification program is completed.

TMI-1 Satisfactory. This was an operational readiness e. valuation conducted by Region I.

I ma-

REQUALIFICATION EXAMINATIONS Second Quarter FY 1984 Region II Facility Results Browns Ferry Satisfactory. Gave total of fifteen R0 and SR0 NRC written examinations.

Eleven passed. Also gave in-plant oral exams to six additional people. All six passed. -

Summer Satisfactory. Substituted two categories on written exam for seventeen SR0's and five R0's. All but three SR0s passed. Gave oral exams to nine of those people and all passed.

The three NRC failures were also identified as failures by facility grading. ,

Turkey Point Satisfactory. This was an audit of utility grading.

4 l

2

REQUALIFICATION EXAMINATIONS Second Quarter FY 1984 Region III Facility Results Big Rock Still in progress. Results will be reported next quarter.

Dresden Still in progress. Results will be reported next quarter.

kewaunee Satisfactory. Completed audit of utility graded exam. Region III will participate in requalification written exam in May. These results will be reported next quarter.

Prairie Island Still in progress. Due to the marginal results of the requalification programs last quarter, Region III will participate in next requalification examination.

L .

4 9

A i

f e

1 i

REQUALIFICATION EXAMINATIONS Second Quarter FY 1984 Region IV Facility Results No exams given.

9 6 e

O e

l l

l .

REQUALIFICATION EXAMINATIONS Second Quarter FY 1984 Region V Facility Results Trojan. Marginal. Utility is submitting corrective action program to Region V for their review. Results of this review will be reported next quarter.

S 6

e e

6 m o

a ewessem -he h -@ @ @@m

. e 4

O O

DO NOT REMOVE THIS PAGE!!!!!

DW/RESULTS OF EXAMS /0L's l

I i

l i

i i

i i

i I

.w e

  • o.