ML20136D767

Order Requesting Name of Person Presenting Argument at 851219 Hearing Re Intervenors Appeal from ASLB 850903 Concluding Partial Initial Decision (LBP-85-35) by 851206. Served on 851120

ML20136D767
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	11/20/1985
From:	Shoemaker C NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
To:	CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO., NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD), OHIO CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY
References
CON-#485-254 LBP-85-35, OL, NUDOCS 8511210364
Download: ML20136D767 (2)

Text

_ -- - _ , _ _ - ..

,. ~rme h(b UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

• 20 P3:45 h 0F 3 . ;

ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD W Administrative Judges:

Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman November 20, 1985 Dr. W. Reed Johnson Howard A. Wilber g n o N o n 0 W.

)

In.the Matter of )

)

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING ) Docket Nos. 50-440 OL COMPANY, ET AL. ) 50-441 OL

)

(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, )

Units 1 and 2) )

)

ORDER Oral argument on the pending appeals of intervenors Ohio Citizens for Responsible Energy and Sunflower Alliance from the Licensing Board's September 3, 1985 Concluding Partial Initial Decision on Emergency Planning, Hydrogen r

1 Control and Diesel Generators will be heard at 9:30 a.m. on l l

Thursday, December 19, 1985, in the NRC Public Hearing Room, j Fifth Floor, East-West Towers Building, 4350 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland. Each of the appellants will have a total of 45 minutes for the presentation of its argument, a reasonable portion of which may be reserved for rebuttal. The appellees (the applicants and the NRC staf f)

I LBP-85-35, 22 NRC . The appeals also challenge certain earlier issued interlocutory orders.

8511210364 851120 PDR ADOCK 05000440 0 PDR

n Sh i

2 will collectively have a total of 90 minutes, to be divided equally between them unless some other agreement is reached.

In preparing for argument, the parties may assume that the members of this Board will be generally familiar with the findings and rulings of the Licensing Board under attack, the relevant portions of the underlying evidentiary record, and the appellate positions of the respective parties as developed in their briefs. For this reason, there will be no necessity for any party to devote a part of its argument to a recitation of the background of the proceeding.

Each party shall advise the Secretary to this Board, by letter mailed no later than December 6, 1985, of the name of the person who will present argument on its behalf.

It is so ORDERED.

FOR THE APPEAL BOARD

0. 0 dYr = + A=

C.-J(an SKoemaker Secretary to the Appeal Board i

{

l L.