ML20141F891

From kanterella
Revision as of 15:16, 26 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notation Vote Response Sheet Approving W/Comments, SECY-97-124, Proposed Federal Policy Re Use of Potassium Iodide After Severe Accident at Npp
ML20141F891
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/23/1997
From: Dicus G
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Hoyle J
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
Shared Package
ML20141F826 List:
References
SECY-97-124-C, NUDOCS 9707030208
Download: ML20141F891 (2)


Text

._ . . _. _ _ _ _ _ __ _ .. . ._ _ _ . . _. . . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . .. _ . _ ..__ ..

e N OT ATIO N VOTE 3

I RESPONSE SHEET l

I TO: John C. Hoyle, Sacretary 1 i FROM: COMMISSIONER DICUS

}

4

SUBJECT:

SECY-97-124 - PROPOSED FEDERAL POLICY REGARDING USE OF POTASSIUM IODIDE AFTER A SEVERE ACCIDENT

) AT A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT i

Approved w/cmts Disapproved , Abstain

< l

Not Participating Request Discussion )

i COMMENTS: (See attached) tlk. O ou iee

'S@NATQRf J Release Vote / / A+v 23 /977 DAT(j '

Withhold Vote / /

Entered on "AS" Yes x No 9707"NO208 970630

< RESPOND PDR

?. . ,

Commissioner Dicus' comments on SECY-97-124.

L I approve option 2. This option continues the present KI policy of stockpiling KI for emergency workers and institutionalized ,

persons but also recognizes that the State or local governments are ultimately responsibie for-the protection of its citizens.

Therefore, the decisions for stockpiling and use of KI.should be left to the discretion of these governments. Under this option,  !

the Federal government would establish funding for the purchase ,

of KI. The State and local governments would be responsible for )

maintenance, distribution and subsequent costs. Under this option, the Federal KI policy would remain unchanged but the

. Federal funding allows State and local' governments that choose to stockpile KI as an additional protective measure for the general public, (which is properly a State or local, not Federal, decision) to do.so with Federal support for purchase of the KI.

Thus, this option facilitates State and local decision making on o the matter while leaving the.present policy in place. Of the two l options recommended by staff, it is preferred because It leaves l the decision wholly within the State.and local governments and free of Federal influence.

For these same reasons, NRC should not effect a rule that requires KI as a protective measure for the public. I believe, however, that NRC licensees should be required, as part of the emergency response planning, to discuss this matter with State  !

and local governments who.make. decisions on protective measures  ;

as part of their planning for responses to emergencies.

Finally, KI stockpiles should be maintained for NRC employees who are expected to perform first responder responsibilities.

l-l.

I

(

o f .

l

l. _ _ _ , . . . ._ _

_ - , _ -