ML20100H631

From kanterella
Revision as of 19:21, 29 April 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to Procedure 6575-ADM-4500.07, Snec Procedure Development,Change Requests & Safety Reviews
ML20100H631
Person / Time
Site: Saxton File:GPU Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/09/1995
From: Curry E
GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20100H615 List:
References
6575-ADM-4500.0, NUDOCS 9602270390
Download: ML20100H631 (30)
v • d • e


Text

- -- - - - -

.:.m -

Number S*** """ '"r ExpennwnW Corporation 6575 ADM-4500.07 SAXTON NUCLEAR Policy and PreMure Manual mm.en No.

rm.

SNEC Procedure Development, Change Requests and '

0 Safety Reviews mw.a. omo. en.cw. om.

S phe m ny/ scop.

6575 11/14/95 All Saxton actMties X Yes No This document is within QA plan scope X Yes No Safety Reviews Required Ust of Effective Pages a

P_aSe,g Revision Paoe Revisson Pggg Revision Egge Revision E51 0 E1 1 0 1.0 0 E61 0 E21 0 2.0 0 E7-1 0 E2 2 0 3.0 0 EF1 0 EF1 0 4.0 0 E3 2 0 5.0 0 ES3 0 0, " ' '

60 0 E3-4 0 7.0 0 E41 0 ,

8.0 0 E42 0 j 9.0 0 I E4 3 0 g 10.0 0 0 E4-4 0 g

_ gc(

11.0 0 0 E4-5 12.0 0 0 E4 6 13.0 ...

' w. ..

b g 3

' f _' Y v

' -$ lb ^ ij sj; -

Originator gjf, d //_7,75 Technical Review (RTR) h ww j[/)M jf[y 97 Saxton Site Supervisor /S/ Perry G. Carmel 11/09/95 jj/'y/{

Manager, Decommissioning Projects f]

Saxton Radiation Safety Officer g y u a v)

Nuclear Safety Assessment Manage % 4, U T Q&

//tWy Marv lw, Environmental Controls P,og,a,n o,,ecte,. Suec

~

7 gp pyg i

I

. mu 1.0 9602270390 960216 I PDR g

ADOCK 05000146 PDR

Number Sea n Nu imr Expennental Capanon SAXTON NUCLEAR Policy and Procedure Manual 6575-ADM-4500.07 Tee Arvision No.

SNEC Procedure Development, Change Requests and 0

Safety Reviews l

TA81.E OF CONTENTS P_gggt Section 1.0 PURPOSE 3.0 2.0 3.0 APPUCA81LITY/ SCOPE 3.0 3.0 DEFINITIONS 5.0 4.0 PROCEDURE Originating New Procedures 5.0 4.1 Safety and Environmental Reviews 7.0 4.2 Technical Reviewer Duties 8.0 4.3 Safety Reviewer Duties 8.0 4.4 Procedure Change Requests (PCR) 9.0 4.5 Temporary Change Notices (TCN) 10.0 4.6 11.0 4.7 Implementing Approval Existing GPUN Procedures 11.0 4.8 11.0 5.0 RESPONSIBluTIES 12.0

6.0 REFERENCES

EXHISITS 12.0 7.0 4

9 N 2.0 mu

1 l

l

- 1 i

NumDw 8'*'"""d*****""""' "'***'"

'SAXTON NUCLEAR Pdicy and Procedure Manual 6575-ADM-4500.07 hn No.  ;

rin.

l SNEC Procedure Development, Change Requests and 0 l Safety Reviews -

l 1.0 PURPOSE To establish a procedure to implement the SNEC Document Preparation, Review and Approval Process by identifying the actions necessary for the preparation, e rev' w and approval of procedures and other types of documents. Existing approved GPUN Corporate /DMsion level procedures, plans, policies and documents are authorized for use at Saxton or in conjunction with Saxton actMties.

2.0 APPUCA81UTY/ SCOPE This procedure applies to all personnel who prepare, review or approve documents that pertain to SNEC actMties.

3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 Environmental DeWiTA 3on A determination of whether the actMty as outlined by a document:

3.1.1 Meets the minimum requirements of Technical Specifications or documents that govem SNEC actMties and/or 3.1.2 Involves any Potential Environmental Impact, as described in Section 3.2.

3.2 Potential Environmental Impact A possible effect or influence on the environment resulting from a proposed actMty, change, facility or process modification, production increase, test or experiment. The following are examples of potential environmental impacts:

3.2.1 A release or potential release to the environment. ,

3.2.2 A change in any systems, components or actions which affect the control of monitoring of actual or potential releases of radioactive or nonradioactive materials to the environment.

3.2.3 A physical or chemical change in the characteristics of plant effluents, withdrawafs or other plant interfaces with the environment. j 3.2.4 Disposal or storage for disposal of radioactive or non-radioactive waste material.

3.2.5 Endangering the health and safety of the public or workers. l 3.2.6 Ethangering the health of plants and animals.

3.2.7 Erosion of the soil or sediment on or surrounding the SNEC site.

I 3.3 Environmental Evaluation A written assessment of an actMty which provides the basis for determining if the activity can be i l

implemented without an environmental impact.

- 3.0 mu

Number S**"""'""***"**" "P"'" "

SAXTON NUCLEAR Policy and Procedure Manual 6575-ADM-4500.07 im. .

n.m.on No.

SNEC Procedure Development, Change Requests and O

Safety Reviews 3.4 Safety Determination i

A determination of whether an actMty as implemented by a particular document involves:

3.4.1 Any potential adverse impact on nuclear safety or safe plant operations, or 3.4.2 A change to any of the following:

e The Technical Specifications / License e The system / component desc-iption in the Safety Analysis Report (SAR),

. e The procedural / operating description in the SAR.

3.4.3 A change which involves a test or experiment not described in the SAR, or 3.4.4 The possibuty of an Unreviewed Safety Question l

3.5 Safety Evaluation A wrtten assessmerit of a document which provides the basis for determining whether the actMty can be implemented without adversely affecting nuclear safety.

J 3.6 Independent Safety Reviewer (ISR)

The certified individual who is responsible for the performance of a Safety Review independent of the originator and Respons24e Technical Reviewer (RTR). Certification shall be based on meeting the 3

qualifications and training requirements of 1000-ADM 1291.01 (Safety Review Process). If the independent Safety Review is accomplished by more than one person, the ISR is the individual j whose signature attests that the review has been adequately performed (Reference 6.3).

3.7 Responsible Technical Reviewer (RTR)

The certified individual who is responsible for the performance of a Technical Review independent of l the originator. Certification shaR be based on meeting the quellfications and training requirements of 1000-ADM-1291.01 (Safety Review Process). If the Technical Review is accomplished by more than one person, the RTR is the individual whose signature attests that the review has been adequately performed (Reference 6.3).

NOTE A list of current certified Independent Safety Reviewers (ISRs) and Responsible Technical Reviewers (RTRs) and their area of cognizance may be found in the SNEC Document Evaluation Book (DEB).

4.0 neu 4

Number )

8** " "" '"r Experimental Cwpwation SAXTON NUCLEAR Policy and Procedure Manual 6575 ADM-4500.07 Fevieson No.

Tatie SNEC Procedure Development, Change Requests and 0

Safety Reviews 3.8 Within the Scope of QA Reference 6.1 describes the actMties and procedures designated wthin the scope of the SNEC QA program. Reference 6.2 further delineates the QA plan requirements and actMties wthin the QA plant scope.

3.9 Non-Substantive Changes Revisions which dg ngt affect the activties associated with the document or the document's j meaning or intent. Examples follow: l 3.9.1 Correction to spelling.

3.9.2 Adding but not deleting sign-off spaces.

3.9.3 Blocking in notes, cautions, etc.

3.9.4 Changes in corporate or personal titles which do not reassign responsibalties and which are

~. not referred to in the Technical Specifications.

3.9.5 Changes to ricir,er,cisture or editorial changes which clearfy do not change function, meaning or intent.

3.10 Procedure Numbering Unti such time as aR SNEC Procedures have been renumbered and reference sections changed, procedure numbers starting with 9400, 6675- and 6575- shall be considered the same (i.e.,9400-ADM-4500.22,6675-ADM-4500.22 referenced in any procedure wBI be referring to 6575-ADM-4500.22).

4.0 PROCEDURE 4.1 Originating New Procedures 4.1.1 The originator shan obtain a document number from the Procedure Coordinator and complete Exhibit 2 or 2a.

4.1.2 SNEC procedures shall be formatted as follows:

4.1.2.1 The cover page shall be in accordance with Exhibit 8/

4.1$2.2 Section 1.0 shan cover the Purpose of the document.

4 4.1.2.3 Section 2.0 shall cover Acolicabaltv/Scooe.

4.1.2.4 Section 3.0 shall cover Definitions,if necessary.

1 4.1.2.5 Section 4.0 shah be the Procedure text itself.

4.1.2.6 Section 5.0 shah cover Responsibuities.

5.0 w.

hmber Samn Nucim Expe*nental Capwadon SAXTON NUCLEAR Policy and Procedure Manual 657WM-4500.07 noe neveen No.

SNEC Procedure Development, Change Requests and Safety Reviews 0 4.1.2.7 Section 6.0 shall list any References.

4.1.2.8 Section 7.0 shall contain any Exhbits.

4.1.3 Drafting Procedures 4.1.3.1 In order to complete the cover page of the document, decide if the document is, "witNn the scope of QA (Reference 3.8).

4.1.3.2 Write the procedure in single, short steps if possible.

4.1.3.3 Obtain cross <fisciplinary input as deemed necessary.

4.1.3.4 Provide enough guidance to permit implementation by the target group.

4.1.3.5 Assure procedure does not conflict with existiry approved procedures / programs.

4.1.3.6 Assure procedure complies with the appropr;.te regtdations (e.g., Tech Specs or Federal or State permits / licenses).

4.1.3.7 Provide Sexibility in areas where possible while maintaining the intent of the procedure.

4.1.3.8 The Originator may also send drafts for inhouse technical review.

4.1.4 Perform a Safety / Environmental Determmation, (and EvaluaLans if required) per Section 4.2 using Exhibit 3.

4.1.5 Select a Responsible Technical Reviewer according to the Matrix of Exhibit 4 and submit the package for technical review, 4.1.6 If a Safety Evaluation is done, submit the package for a Safety Review. Select a Safety Reviewer according to the Matrix of Exhibit 4.

NOTE SNEC Safety Reviews are required for documents / changes if a Safety Evaluation has been performed A Safety Review is not required if only an Environmental Evaluation has been done.

4.1.7 Det&mine individuals / groups that must concur. As a minimum organizations assigned responsibilities in the procedure must concur. Individuals / groups that must sign for concurrence shed be given a draft copy for review so that their comments may be considered for ircvipwi.hi into the final draft. Extemal review groups should be given a Document Review Sheet Exhibit 7.

~ 6.0 mu

b i

Numbw S"' " "" '*" Expwinwrtal Capwedon SAXTON NUCLEAR Policy and Procedure Manusi 6575-ADM-4500.07 nn. Ammon No. J SNEC Procedure Development, Change Requests and Safety Reviews 0

. 4.1.8 . The originator shall attempt to resolve the cornrnents rnade during the review process.

Disagreements that cannot be resolved by the originator shen be referred to successively higher levels of authorty if agreement cannot be reached, final resolution shall be determined by the party designated to approve in the Review and Approval Matrix. Exhibit 4.

4.1.9 Submit the final draft of the document and the complete package to the Procedure Coordinator. The Procedure Cw&Va shah:

e Transmit the package for typing e Obtain the final signatures e Forward the document to Document Controis for distribution NOTE Ensure a copy of the entire package has been maintained for departmental procedure records.

4.2 Safety and Environmental Reviews 4.2.1 Guidance for completing Exhibits 3,3a and 3b.

4.2.1.1 The Origmator/ Preparer shen complete the Safety and Environmental Determination Form, (Exhibit 3), for aN new documents and for substantive changes to existing documents, according to Sections 4.2.2 and 4.2.3.

4.2.1.2 The determinations are to show the reviewers and approvers that potential safety issues and environmental concoms have been recognized by considering:

e The effect of actions that are outlined in the procedure / document as they pertain to safety or environmental concems.

O Compliance with Technical Specifications.

4.2.1.3 If any question on Exhibit 3 or 3a is answered *yes", the originator shen prepare and attach the appropnate written evaluations to Exhibit 3 per Sections 4.2.4 and/or 4.2.5.

4.2.1.4 ff the Evaluation does not prove elimmation or minimization of the concom, the document / document change cannot be implemented.

4.2.2 Environmental Determinsbon Ousebon 1 penains to the Environmental Determmation as defined in Section 3.1. Any 'yes" answer on the Environmental Determination requires an Environmental Evaluation per Section 4.2.5. Consult Environmental Affairs /Ucensing for assistance in the Environmental

. Evaluation.

4-s 7.0 m

SAXTON NUCLEAR 8'*'""""'****"*"' ** 6575-ADM-4500.07 Policy and Procedure Manuel Tme Revisen No.

SNEC Procedure Development, Change Requests and Safety Reviews ,

0 4.2.3 Safety Determination Questions 4,5,6 and 7 of Exhibit 3 pertain to the Safety Determination as dehned in Section 3.4. If any of the answers to Questions 4,5,6 or 7 are "yes",' complete the Safety Evaluation on Exhibit 3b which includes 50.59 consderations and determination of an unreviewed safety question.

4.2.4 Safety Evaluation The Safety Evaluation (Exhibit 3b) is a written explanation of all "yes" answers, an explanation of how the actMty wW be implemented without adversely affecting nuclear safety and any calculations or other documents used to support the evaluation. Attach to Exhibit 3b.

4.2.5 Environmental Evaluations The Environmental Evaluation shall be a written explanation of all *yes" answers on the Environmental Determination Form, and evaluation of how the activity WW be implemented without adversely impacting the environment and any calculations or other documents used to support the evaluation. Consider both radiological and non-radiological releases. Attach the evaluation to Exhibit 3b.

4.3 Responsible Technical Reviewer

, 4.3.1 Review the entire document package including the procedure text, the completed Exhibit 3 and any attached written evaluations.

4.3.2 Sign the attached documents where requirid. The signature of the Responsible Technical Reviewer signifies concurrence that technical, safety and environmental considerations have been properfy addressed, and that all determinations and evaluations are complete and accurate. The signature also indicates that the RTR was independent of the Originator and releases the document for further pE-:- "i.

4.4 Independent Safety Reviewer 4.4.1 Review the package to confirm that nuclear safety aspects of the document have been property addressed and the Safety Evaluation is complete and accurate.

4.4.2 Obtain cross disciplinary inputs and specialist assistance as needed to perform the Safety Review.

~

4.4.3 Sign the attached documents where required. The signature also attests that the ISR was independent of the Originator and the RTR.

e 8.0 neu

I S**'"""'**'*"*"' '"""

SAXT0lli NUCLEAR Policy and Procedure Manual 6575-ADM-4500.07 r= w wo.

SNEC Procedure Development, Change Requests and safety Reviews 0 4.5 Procedure Change Requests A Procedure Change Request (PCR) is used when the change is not required immediately and the change is permanent in nature. Document changes and/or general revisions shall be initiated by use of Exhibit 2, " Procedure Change Request Form".

4.5.1 The Originator of the change shall obtain a PCR number from the Procedure Coordinator.

'4.5.2 The Procedure Coordinator shall complete the PCR log. Exhibit 5.

4.5.3 The Originator shall complete ExNbit 2.

4.5.3.1 If the answer to question 1 is 'no" make the. revision and submit the draft package for review and approval.

NOTE Verify that the document has been property classified j 4.5.3.2 If the answer to question 1 is "yes", complete Exhibit 3 in accordance with Section 4.2. l l

4.5.3.3 Submit all PCR documents for the required revows in accordance with Sections 4.1.5 through 4.1.8.

4.5.3.4 Submit the package to the Procedure Coordinator for the completion of duties as outlined in Section 4.1.g.

NOTE Ensure a copy of the entire package has been maintained for departmental procedure records.

NOTE Nonsubstantive revisions only require Originator and Approver signatures. However, the cover page needs to maintain the concurring organizational element status. Therefore, the concurring signature titles shall be ialt intact from the old revision. The signature blocks shall be marffed as "N/A". The date of the previous review signature shaN be filled in on the date line for each concurring title marked as "N/A*.

9 s 9.0 mu

i Number Saxt n Nudw Expe&nental Capwation SAXTON NUCLEAR Policy and Procedure Manual 6575-ADM-4500.07 True Asvmon No. i SNEC Procedure Development, Change Requests and )

0 Safety Reviews 4

4.6 Temporary Change Notices 4.6.1 Temporary Changa Notices (TCN's) provide the abilty to make changes to a procedure in a short amount of time. The use of TCN's shall be limited to the following cases:

4.6.1.1 When the change is of a temporary nature and should not result in a permanent revision, or i

4.6.1.2 When time or program condtions do not permit the use of a PCR. However, if the change is permaner.t a PCR shall be submkted, by the Originator of the TCN, and approved within 90 di, 4.6.2 Preparation of TCN's 4.6.2.1' The Originator shall obtain a TCN number from the Procedure Coordinator.

4.6.2.2 The Procedu;e Coordinator shall complete the TCN Log, Exhibit 6.

'. 4.6.2.3 The Originator shall complete Part (a) of Exhibit 2a.

4.6.2.4 If the uswer to question 1 is "no" make the revision and submk the draft package for review and approval. If the answer to question 1 is "yes", complete Exhibit 3 in l accorG4nce wkh Section 4.2. J 4 6.2.5 in Exhibit 2a, provide a general dek,.;piksi of the change (s). Reference affected pages and section numbers 4.6.2.6 Attach an edkod copy of the affected pages of the pmcedure to Exhibit 2a.

4.6.2.7 The review requirements for TCN's are % same as those outlined in Sections 4.1.4 through 4.1.6.

4.6.2.8 The Originator is responsible for obtaining all review and approval signatures.

4.6.2.9 The TCN shall become effective wkh the implementing approval signature. The Originator shall then make a working copy of the TCN package for use by the target group.

4.6.2.10 The original TCN packet shall be forwarded to the Procedure CCordinator. A copy shall be transmitted to Document Control for distribution 4.6.3 Cancellation of TCN's 4.6.3.1 A TCN is good for a maximum of 90 days and can be cancelled by one of the following:

O incorporation into an implemented procedure change request (PCR)

O Expiration date b

10.0 2m.

(

Number Staton Nuclear Expenmental Corporation SAXTDg gUCg g Policy and Procedure Manual 6575 ADM-4500.07 new.on No.

im.

SNEC Procedure Development, Change Requests and 0

Safety Reviews 1

9 Early cancellation by the Originator  !

l 4 6.3.2 The Originator is responsible for the cancellation of TCN's. ]

I 4.6.3.3 The Originator is responsible for tracking his/her TCN expiration date.

4.6.3.4 To cancel a TCN, obtain the original package from the Procedure Coordinator and complete Part (b), Exhibit Ra.

l 4.6.3.5 Forward the cancelled TCN package to the Procedure Coordinator for tra'nsmittal to Document Control.

4.6.3.6 When a PCR which incorporates a TCN is aooroved, cancel the TCN and submit both packages to the Procedure Coordinator for transmittal to Document Control.

NOTE Use the effective date of the new procedure as the cancellation date of the TCN.

4.7 Implementing Approval~

1 4.7.1 The implementing Approver will be as described in Exhibit 4.

4.7.2 The Implementing Approver, along with the Originator, will establish the effective date of the l document at the time of firal signature.

NOTE When choosing an effectivo date consider the time necessary for final distribution.

4.8 Existing GPUN Procedures

4.8.1 GPUN depsutir.rd l level and specialtzed procedures, plans, policies 2nd documents may be utilized as deemed appropnate for use at or for Saxton activities with the approval of the Program Director, SNEC (or designee) and concurrence of a Responsible Technical Reviewer. A listing of approved documents will be maintained in the SNEC Document Evaluations Book (DEB) which is controlled and distributed by the SNEC procedure coosdinator. Once on the approved list, revisions will not affect the status of usage for Saxton activities.

i 5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 The Originator is responsible for:

5.1.1 Preparing a technically adequate document.

5.1.2 Obtaining applicable technical, safety and cross 4isciplinary reviews as required.

N 11.0 mu 4

Number Saxt n Nu lear Experinwntal Cop SAXTON NUCLEAR Policy and Procedure Manual 6575-ADM-4M.07 True Revisron No.

SNEC Procedure Development, Change Requests and Safety Reviews 0 5.1.3 ResoMng any comments made during the review process.

5.1.4 Completing the Safety /Erwironmental dete mination and any required evaluations.

5.2 The Responsible Technical Reviewer is responsible for ensuring that:

5.2.1 The activities performed in accordance with the document being reviewed are techrucally correct and concordant with safe plant operations.

5.2.2 The actMtles performed in accordanco with the document being reviewed meet legally mandated monitoring requirements.

5.3 The Independent Safety Reviewer is responsible for ensuring that nuclear safety considerations have been adequately evaluated and are property addressed in the Safety Evaluation.

5.4 The implementing Approver is responsible for:

5.4.1 Ensuring that the administrative requirements of this procedure have been satisfied.

5.4.2 Releasing the document for implementation.

5.5 The Procedure Coordinator is responsible for:

5.5.1 Maintaining document logs.

5.5.2 Maintaining procedure records.

5.5.3 Complying with record retention and reporting requirements.

5.5.4 Forwarding documents to Document Control for processing.

6.0 REFERENCES

6.1 SNEC Technical Specifications 6.2 6575-QAP 7200.01, SNEC Quality Assurance Program 6.3 1000-ADM-1291.01 Safety Review Process 7.0 EXHIBITS

~

7.1 Exhibit 1, " Flow Chart for Safety Review and Approva! Process' 7.2 Exhibit 2, " Procedure Change Request Form" Exhibit ia, " Temporary Change Notice Form"

~

' 2.0 1 neu

l

~~

SAXTON NUCLEAR S**"""'"*"'" "P '*" a '

PoPcy and Procedure Manual 6575-ADM-4500.07 im. neaman m.  ;

SNEC Procedure Development, Change Requests and Safety Reviews ,

O l

7.3 Exhibit 3. ' Safety / Environmental Determination Form" l Exhibit 3a, " Environmental Determination" l

Exhibit 3b, " Safety Evaluation' 7.4 Exhibit 4, "SNEC Review and Approval Matrix" 7.5 Exhibit 5, " Procedure Change Request Log

  • 1 7.6 Exhibit 6, " Temporary Change Notice Log"  !

7.7 Exhibit 7, ' Document Review Sheet" 7.8 Exhibit 8, ' Document Cover Page" ,

i l

l l

l j

' i 13.0 no. 1

. EXHIBIT 1 8575-ADM-4500.07 Revision 0 Flow Chart for Safety Review and Approval Process

, I I

Prep. Doc.

New Decoment or No Substantive Change

,J Yes i

y y g Safety Determination, . No Env. Determination, Potential Env. Impac t?

lisolear Safety Related?

Y y Yes 3r Yes 9P l Safety Eval. Env. Eval.

V V Tech T' h Tech Tech Review .

Revleu Review Review Safety <

V Review N -

i t Approval and implementation

- E1-1 mu

Number 8'**"""'**'"**"**"C"P"*""

SAXTON NUCLEAR Policy and Procedure Manual 6575-ADM-4500.07 im.  % on re.

SNEC Procedure Development, Cha'nge Requests :nd Safety Reviews 0 l l

l EXHIBIT 2 l Procedure Change Request Form Section 1 Date j PCR #

Procedure No. Rev.

Document

Title:

l Circle the appropriate "yes" or 'no" answer

1) is this a new procedure or a substantive YES NO revision to the document? See Section 3.9 for examples of nonsubstanth/e changes.

~

If the answer is "yes', complete Exhibit 3.

If "no*, forward the document for implementing l approval.

2) Does this PCR incorporate a TCN7 YES NO If the answer is "yes", what is the TCN
  • Description of Change:

l 1

Originator Date

~

Technical Review (RTR) Date Safety Review (ISR) Date .

(Other) Date implementing Approval Date i 4

O E2-1 ac ,,

l Number S**' " ""d**' 5**""*" C"Poration SAXTON NUCLEAR Policy and Procedure Manual 6575-ADM-4500.07 Aswieson No.

True ONEC Procedure Development, Change Requests and 0

safety Reviews

+ EXHistT 2a Temporary Change Notice Form Part (a)

TCN# Effective Date Procedure No, Rev.

Document

Title:

Reason for Change:

1) is this a substantive revision to the document? YES. NO See Section 3.9 for exaraples of non-substantive changes.

If the answer is "yes", complete Exhibit 3.

If "no", forward the document for iraplementing approval I

Expiration Date (not to exceed 90 days)

Part (b) ,

l TCN Cancelled By Signature /Date Reason for Cancellation PCR Originator Expired (check one) ,

Description of change:

1 I

Originator - Date ,

1 Technical Review (RTR) Date Safety Review (ISR) Date (Other) Date

, implementing Approval Date E2-2 ma

  • =

EXHiefT 3 6575-ADM-4500.07 Revision 0 Safety / Environmental Detemunation and 50.59 Review SNEC Page 1 of Document / Activity T'rtie Document No. iif applicans.) Doc.Rev.No.

Type of Activity imodification. procedwe. seet. expenment. or doewnenth

1. Does tNs document involve any potential non-nuclear environmental O Yes O no concerns?

To answer tNs question, complete the Environmental Determination (ED) form, ExNbit 3a. Any YES answer on the ED from requires an Environmental impact Assessment by Environmental Controls.

If in doubt, consult Environmental Contrais or Environmental Ucensing for assistance if all answers are NO, further environmental review is not required in any event, continue with Question 2, below.

2. Is this activity /documerr. listed in Exhibit 1 of 6575-QAP-7200.01, O Yes O No SNEC Quality Assurance Program?

If the answer to question 1 is NO, stop here. TNs procedure is not applicable and no documentation is required. (if tNs activity / document is listed in Exh.1 of 6575-OAP-7200.01 review on a case-by-case beeis to determine applicability). If the answer is YES, proceed to question 3.

3. is this a new activity / document or a substantive revision to an O Yes O No activity / document?

(See Section 3.9 of this promdure for examples of non-substantive changes).

If the answer to question 3 is NO, stop here and complete the approval section below. TNs procedure is not applicable and no documentation is required. If the answer is YES, proceed to answer all remaining questions. These answers become the Safety / Environmental Determination and 50.59 Review.

4. Does this activity / document have the potential to adversely affect nuclear O Yes O No  ;

safety or safe plant operations?

5. Does this activity / document require revision of the system / component Yes O No description of the Techtscal Specifications or any other part of the SAR7
6. Does the activity / document require revision of any procedural or operating O Yes No

' description of the Technical Specifications or any othn part of the SAR?

7. Are tests or experiments conducted wNch are not described, the Yes O No

' Technical Specifications or any part of the SAR?

IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS 4,5,6, OR 7 ARE YES, PREPARE A WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATION FORM.

If the answers to 4,5,6, and 7 are NO, this produdes the occurrence of an Unreviewed Safety Question or Technical Specifications change. Provide a written statement in the space provided below (use back of

' sheet if necessary) to support the determination, and list the documents you checked.

IJO. because: ,

Documents etwcked:

I r

APPROVALS fannt narne and aioni Originator Date Responsible Technical Reviewer Date

, independent Safety Reviewer Date Other Reviewer (s) Date

' E3-1 nm

Number Saxt n Nu lear Expedmental Corporadon

~SAXTON NUCLEAR Policy and Procedure Manual 6575-ADM-4500.07 Tme Rev*on M.

SNEC Procedure Development, Change Requests and l Safety Reviews .

O EXHIBIT 3a l 1

Environmental Determination New Procedure SNEC ,_, _,_ - TCN STCN _,,,, __, - l Y R No. Y R No. i PCR SNEC- --

i Y R No.

Document No. Rev.No.

1. Will Document implementation result in an increased potential to release Yes No hazardous chemicals (gas, liquid, sclid or semi-solid) to the environment?
2. Will Document implementation compromise existing capablity to control, Yes No treat, or monitor releases to the environment?
3. Will Document implementation cause a physical or chermcal change in the Yes No characteristics of faculty discharges, effluents, or withdrawals?
4. Will Document implementation result in the permanent of temporary storage Yes No (for use, disposal, or transfer) or any hazardous or other regulated waste, or hazardous chemical (s), outside of wtablished handling facElties or procedures where the margin of control or cortainment wil increase the potential of a release to the environment?
5. Will the implementation of the Document resdt in an increase in the amount Yes No 3

or a change in the type of hazardous wasto(s) typically generated, and/or  ;

previously evaluated for the type of activ'g?

6. Does Document implementation result in larw. disturbance (e.g., excavation Yes No _

work, grading), or modification or alteration of storm water drainage systems that would change site storm water runoff or increase sediment loading of  ;

4 storm water runoff? ,

i 7. Will Document implementation result in a physical afteration to a waste water Yes No treatment faelity or other faclity system (s) or component regulated.by environmental permit-(e.g., discharge to groundwater permit, discharge to surface water permit, etc.)?

Prepared By:

  • Date:

E3 2 w.

i

- m,n , l

~

S**'""****""*"'C+"

SAXTON NUCLEAR Policy and Procedure Manual 6575-ADM-4500.07 '~~

i 1._:. No. f

, - Tine SNEC Procedure Development, Change Requests and j 0

Safety Reviews l

1 EXHIBIT 3b l

Safety Evolustion PAGE 2 OF ACTIVITY / DOCUMENT TITLE DOCUMENT NO. (if applicable) Rev.No. j l

(Modification, procedure, test, experiment, or document)

This Safety Evaluation provides the basis for d2Mrdrg whether this actMty/ document involves i I

an Unroviewed Safety Question or impacts on nuclear safety.

Answer the following questions and provide reason (s) for each answer. A simple statement of conclusion in itself is not sufficient. The scope and depth of each reason should be commensurate with the safety significance and cu,T@ay of the proposed change.

1. WM implementation of the actMty/ document adversely affect nuclear Yes No safety or safe plant operations?

The following questions comprise the 50.59 considerations and evaluation to determine if an Unreviewed Safety Question exists:

2. Is the probabilty of occurrence of the consequences of an accident or ,

malfunction of equipment important to safety previously evaluated in the Safety Analysis Report increased? O Yes No

3. Is the possibilty for an arcident or malfunction of a different type than any evaluated previously in the Safety Analysis Report created? O Yes O No
4. Is the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification reduced? O Yes No if any answer above is "yes" an impact on nucieer safety or an Unreviewed Safety Question exists. If an adverse impact on nuclear safety exists revise or redesign. If an unroviewed safety questions with no adverse impact on nuclear safety exists forward to Licensing with any additional documentation to support a request for NRC approval prior to implementing approval APPROVALS pintnameenesien) ' Date Originator Responsible Technical Reviewer indeoendent Safety Reviewer Other Reviewer (s)

E3-3 mu <

~ 1 S*" " ""d**' **i""" C""** ~*"

SAXTON NUCLEAR Policy and Procedure Manual 6575-ADM-4500.07 Trn. a.v on m.

SNEC Procedure Development, Change Requests and O

Safety Reviews EXHIBIT 3b (Cont'd) l SAFETY EVALUATION Page of (Continuation Sheet) l l

l 1

i O

i l

(

i 1

4 9

1 a

  • e E3 4 non

. ._ - - .. . - - . _ ~ . .. . . . . _ . . _- . .. ..

1 ,

\

EXHIBIT 4 887MDM-4600.07 Revision 0 l- ,

SNEC Review and Approval Metrix PREPARATION / INDEPENDENT IMPLEMENTING t SUBJECT TECHNICAL REVIEW SAFETY REVIEW APPROVAL

t. PLANS / PROCEDURES '#I/ REVISIONS A. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS ~

PROGRAM DIRECTOR,

) SNEC

1. Procedure Review and APPUCABLE APPUCABLE Approval DMSION/ DEPT. DMSION/ DEPT. (or DESIGNEE)

PROGRAM DIRECTOR,-

2. Tempcrary Change APPUCABLE APPUCABLE SNEC Method DMSiON/ DEPT. DMSION/ DEPT. (or DESIGNEE) j PROGRAM DIRECTOR.
3. Equipment Control (Lock - APPUCABLE APPUCABLE SNEC DMSION/ DEPT. (or CES;GNEE)

& Tag) DMSiON/ DEPT.

PROGRAM DIRECTOR,

4. Log Entries, Recud APPUCABLE APPUCABLE SNEC Retention & Rev. Proc. DMSlON/ DEPT. DMSION/ DEPT. (or DESIGNEE)

PROGRAM DIRECTOR, APPUCABLE APPUCABLE SNEC

5. Access to Containment DMSION/ DEPT. DMSION/ DEPT. (or DESIGNEE)
6. Plant Administrative Procedures that alther G M DmE N ,

Assign Responsiblities to APPUCABLE APPUCABLE I I *"

DMSION/ DEPT.' DMSiON/ DEPT.

g (or DES GNEE)

Requirements of Work Pedormance e

E41 m r.

- - - - - . _ ~ - - _ - - - _ - . . _ _ . . . _ __ .-

EXHIBIT 4 (Cont'd) 8575-ADM-4600.07 Revision 0 sNEC Review end Approval Matrix PREPARATION / INDEPENDENT IMPLEMENTING TECHNICAL REVIEW SAFETY REVIEW APPROVAL ,

SUBJECT

8. GENERAL PLANTN SITE SUPERVISOR, RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS' SNEC
1. System Operating OR TECH FUNCTIONS OR TECH FUNCTIONS (or DESIGNEE)

SITE SUPERVISOR, j RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS SNEC RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS

2. Alarm Responses OR TECH FUNCTIONS OR TECH FUNCTIONS (or DESIGNEE)  ;

SITE SUPERVISOR, RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS SNEC

3. Work Instructions OR TECH FUNCTIONS OR TECH FUNCTIONS (or DESIGNEE)

SITE SUPERVISOR, RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS SNEC

4. Chemistry OR TECH FUNCTIONS OR TECH FUNCTIONS (or DESIGNEE)

SITE SUPERVISOR, i RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS SNEC

5. Fire Protection OR TECH FUNCTIONS OR TECH FUNCTIONS (or DESIGNEE)

C. MAINTENANCE SITE SUPERVISOR, RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS SNEC RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS

1. Calibration OR TECH FUNCTIONS OR TECH FUNCTIONS (or DESIGNEE)

SITE SUPERVISOR,

2. Control of Measuring & Test RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS SNEC E?*wnent OR TECH FUNCTIONS OR TECH FUNCTIONS (or DESIGNEE)

SITE SUPERVISOR, )

3. Preventive RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS SNEC l Maintenance OR TECH FUNCTIONS OR TECH FUNCTIONS (or DESIGNEE)

SITE SUPERVISOR,

4. Corrective RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS SNEC l l l Maintenance OR TECH FUNCTIONS OR TECH FUNCTIONS (or DESIGNEE)

O. SURVEILLANCE

' SITE SUPERVISOR, SNEC

-l 1. Surveillance RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLSA RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS (or DESIGNEE)

! SITE SUPERVISOR,

! 2. In Service SNEC Inspections . RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS RAD /ENVIR. CONTROLS (or DESIGNEE) i 4

i E'4-2 mu l-i

- ~ - - . . . . - - . . . . - - - . . . - . . - - . ~ -

EXHIBIT 4 (Cont'd) e575 ADM-4500.07 Revision 0 SNEC Review and Approval Metrix PREPARATION / INDEPENDENT IMPLEMENTING SUBJECT TECHNICAL REVIEW' SAFETY REVIEW APPROVAL-E. RADIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS PROCEDURES PROGRAM DIRECTOR,

1. Radiological Controls RAD CON RAD CON SNEC PROGRAM DIRECTOR,
2. Effluent Monitoring RAD CON RAD CON SNEC
3. Erthonmental Monitoring ENV. CON. ENV CON.

Erwiron. Programs ENV. CON. ENV. CON. MGR. ENV. CON.

a.

ENV. CON./ENV. LAB ENV. LAB MGR. ENV. CON.

b. Erwiron. Lab 4

A F. PLANS /RELATED PROCEDURES

1. Flood Protection Program TECH FUNCTIONS TECH APPUCABLE DIVISION FUNCTIONS DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE
a. Flood Protection TECH FUNCTIONS TECH APPUCABLE DIVISION Program implementing FUNCTIONS DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE Procedures RAD CON PROGRAM DIRECTOR,
2. Radioactive Effluent Controis RAD CON SNEC Program RAD CON PROGRAM DIRECTOR,
a. Radioactive Efiluent RAD CON Controls Program SNEC Implementing

' Procedures PROGRAM DIRECTOR, Efiluent Monitoring RAD CON RAD CON SNEC b.

ENV. CON. ENV. CON. MANAGER, ENV. CON.

3. Radiological Environment Monitoring Program ENV. CON. ENV. CON. MANAGER, ENV. CON.
a. Radiological Environment Monitoring Program j implementing Procedures l MANAGER, ENV. CON.
b. Environmental Monitoring ENV. CON. ENV. CON.

l

4. Fire Protection Program TMI OR TECH TMI OR TECH APPUCABLE DIVISION FUNCTIONS FUNCTIONS DIRECTOR OF DESIGNEE j a. Fire Protodion Program implementing TMI OR TECH TMI OR TECH APPUCABLE DIVISION Documents FUNCTIONS FUNCTIONS DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE
5. SNEC OA Program NUCLEAR SAFETY NUCLEAR SAFETY DIVISION DIRECTOR AND l

4 ASSESSMENT- ASSESSMENT DIRECTOR NSA CONCUR J

I  !

r ,

' E4-3 m

  • j

l l

EXHIBIT 4 (Cont'd) 6575-ADM-4500.07 Revision 0 SNEC Review and Approval Matrk PREPARATION / INDEPENDENT IMPLEMENTING SUBJECT TECHNICAL REVIEW SAFETY REVIEW APPROVAL F. PLANS /RELATED PROCEDURES A (Cont'd) l

6. Radiation Protection Program RAD CON RAD CON APPLICABLE DIVISION  ;

DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE  :

7. Offsite Dose Calculation RAD CON RAD CON PROGRAM DIRECTOR. l Manual (ODCM) OR ENV. CON. OR ENV. CON. SNEC
a. ODCM implementing RAD CON RAD CON OR PROGRAM DIRECTOR.

Rad Con Procedures ENV. CON. SNEC

b. ODCM Implementing ENV. CON. RAD CON OR PROGRAM DIRECTOR, Env. Con. Procedures ENV. CON. SNEC l

)

1 i

e E4-4 ,

3m,

EXHIBIT 4 (Cont'd) 6575-ADM-4500.07 Revision 0 SNEC Review and Approwel Matrix p'

i PREPARATION / INDEPENDENT IMPLEMENTING SUBJECT TECHNICAL REVIEW SAFETY REVIEW APPROVAL

11. CHANGES TO THE FACluTY A. DESIGN CHANGES & MODIFICATIONS TO UNIT SYSTEMS & EQUIPMENT TECH FUNCTIONS UCENSING MANAGER,
1. Design changes and modification to Unit Systems OR RAD /ENV. CON. DECOMMISSIONING and Equipment as described PROJECTS in SAR.

TECH FUNCTIONS TECH FUNCTIONS MANAGER,  ;

2. Installation Procedures for l changes and modifications to OR RAD /ENV. CON. DECOMMISSIONING Unit Systems and Equipment PROJECTS ]

as described in SAR. J TECH FUNCTIONS TECH FUNCTIONS MANAGER, i

3. Work Procedures and Job DECOMMISSIONING l Orders OR RAD /ENV. CON.

PROJECTS B. Temporary Change to Faculty MANAGER,

1. Applicable Procedures and DECOMMISSIONING l

' Documentation ANY DIVISION NO ANY DIVISION N PROJECTS l Ill. UCENSING DOCUMENTS PROG RECTOR, A. UCENSEE EVENT REPORT RAD /ENV. CON.

UCENSING g RAD /ENV. CON OR R%M DIRECOR, B. TECH SPECS /UCENSEE UCENSING CHANGE REQUEST TECH FUNCTIONS SNEC 9

E4-5 my

. - ~ . . - - . - .- . . - . _ _ - .. . . ~ . . . . - - . . -.

6875-ADM-4500.07 EXHitslT 4 (Cont'd)

Revision 0 SNEC Review and Approval Metrir REVIEW COORDINATOR H REVIEWER M REQUIREMENT SOURCE

- SUBJECT W

f IV. REVIEWS AND EVALUATIONS A. Violations, deviations. and DIVISION ISR M SNEC TECHNICAL RESPONSIBLE SPECIFICATIONS l reportable events which require reporting to the NRC in writing DIVISION RTR SNEC TECHNICAL

! 8. Irwestigation Reports of all l RESPONSIBLE FOR SPECIFICATIONS vloistions of Technical ' ,

Specifications VIOLATION 1 l '

3 INDEPENDENT AS ASSIGNED BY SNEC TECHNICAL C. Other reviews deemed necessary SAFETY REVIEWER INDEPENDENT SPECIFICATIONS i by an independent Safety  ;

I (ISR) SAFETY REVIEWER Reviewer  !

NUCLEAR SAFETY AS ASSIGNED BY SNEC TECHNICAL

! D. Written Summaries of Audit ASSESSMENT NSA (ISR) SPECIFICATIONS l Reports

, j NOTES

  • (A) See Procedure 1000-ADM 1218.01 for review, concurrence and

. approval requirements.

(8) As defined in Division procedures, Tech. Functions will provide an j independent review of new procedures and major revisions of

existing procedures or upon request I

(C) As defined in Division procedures.

(D) Only those procedures specifically identified on the matrix.

(E) In accord with approved Division procedures.

}

(F) Any configuration change to the plant must be communicated to l

Technical Functions Division. ,

(G) Licensing wel assign an ISR to the appropriate department.

1 (H) Review Coordinator - is responsible to initiate or identify issues of potential safety signihcance and forward aporopriate data to the

)

assigned review organization and ensure that the resulting review is documented, retumed and filed.

(I) . Reviewer is responshie for the Technical Review or independent Safety Review of assigned revows j l

(J) ISR to be documented in the form in Exhibit 9 of 1000 ADM-1291.01.

i O

E4-6 um 9

-am - a __ 4 a m . m-.-, _ s --.w 0

4 k

w r

O f

li I

h s g I l

:3 I

.i 4l $

5 1 .

l.

8

m. .

w y

o b

{

i

l 5 .

g5 98 -

b 4  !

li '

. 8 h

i- -

1 e is 3

- o  ;

t, m

2 g  :

. e k *

=

8 e

5 W

I e

. G B

  • .5 3

a a

I I 1]

i i! s

]1 1 1

a lI E

b ja' .

6

}

gj 1 -

l -

, a 6575-ADM-4500.07 t Revision 0 EXHIBIT 8 1

i N. amber

  • SAXTON NUCLEAR S**a ""**' **"*"* C 'P t'oa Policy and Procedure Manual 6575-ADM-4500.07 Titi.

4 Rensson No.

d Spac.netwsmp. s pon die omo.

f en.cov. o.i.

6575 This document is within QA plan scope X Yea No

, Safety Reviews Required X Yes No

} Ust of Effective Pages fagg Revision 'fggg Revision fagg Revision Pg2R Revision i

e l

5 i

a hs Nhh IkY hbhs$ JW N%

2 .

? I l

l l

)

4 1

l 1

I 1

I l

l l

l 1

E8-1 1 m I l

1

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20100H631&oldid=2777497"